August 21, 2015 Project No. EH130228A. Concrete Nor West P.O. Box 280 Mount Vernon, Washington Attention: Mr. Dan Cox

Similar documents
Betsy Stevenson and Allison Mohrs (Skagit County Planning and Development Services) Jenny Baker, The Nature Conservancy

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

,Baynes Lake. TO...?&.?...A 2...KO.?'!!&... Sr. *logical Engineer

How & Where does infiltration work? Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

Groundwater Hydrology

Geology and Soils. Technical Memorandum

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Our File: 92 F/1, 92 F/8. Numerous licenced springs occur north of the B.C. Hydro right-of-way on. Water Management Branch

Appendix G. Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions and Historical Mining Northwest of the Centro Subarea in the Randsburg, Red Mountain, and Atolia Area

Appendix F4.11 Geologic Unit Summaries, Hazard Areas, and Boring Locations

April

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

11/22/2010. Groundwater in Unconsolidated Deposits. Alluvial (fluvial) deposits. - consist of gravel, sand, silt and clay

AWRA PMAS Engineers Club of Philadelphia. A Geologic Perspective on Stormwater

Evolution of the conceptual hydrogeologic and ground-water flow model for Las Vegas Valley, Clark County, Nevada

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

Seismic Reflection Imaging across the Johnson Ranch, Valley County, Idaho


Laboratory Exercise #4 Geologic Surface Processes in Dry Lands

16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN

THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND ENERGY INDUSTRIES MINERALS DIVISION MINE DESIGN TEMPLATE OPERATOR NAME: OPERATOR ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FACSIMILE:

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

The Geology of Sebago Lake State Park

Appendix D. Sediment Texture and Other Soil Data

Michigan s Geology and Groundwater

Evaluation of Subsurface Formation of Pabna District, Bangladesh

Soils, Hydrogeology, and Aquifer Properties. Philip B. Bedient 2006 Rice University

GEOLOGY AND SOILS. This chapter summarizes geologic and geotechnical aspects of the site as they relate to the Project.

Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin, Sutter Subbasin

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Enhanced Characterization of the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer Using Surface Geophysical Methods

APPENDICES. Appendix A City Standard Details Appendix B Engineering Geology Report

GEOL.3250 Geology for Engineers Glacial Geology

Proposed Cemetery Thornhill Road. Tier One Hydrogeological Risk Assessment. Peter Mitchell Associates

Wisconsin s Hydrogeology: an overview

Groundwater Investigation SOUTHGATE GRAVEL PIT Part of Lot 15, Concession 15 (formerly Township of Proton), Township of Southgate.

REPORT OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

.. :2. Our File: 82 G/3 #2. T 8 A.P. Kohut Senior Geological Engineer Groundwater Sect ion Water Management Branch. Date: August 30, 1985.

Soils of Rhode Island

General Geologic Setting and Seismicity of the FHWA Project Site in the New Madrid Seismic Zone

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

Geology and New England Landscapes

MEMORANDUM. REVISED Options for Landslide Regulations: Setbacks and Slope Height

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

Impact of the Danube River on the groundwater dynamics in the Kozloduy Lowland

Subsurface Geology of the Kennebec River

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

Landslides and Ground Water Permeability with Respect to the. Contact Point of Glacial Lake Vermont and the Champlain Sea

THURSTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE

Name: Mid-Year Review #2 SAR

Lower Mainland Surficial Geology From Wisconsin Ice Age to Protocol 21

Surficial Geology of Dunlap Quadrangle

' International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement. 2 Groundwater Investigations. N.A. de Ridder'? 2.1 Introduction. 2.

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Las Vegas Valley is a fault-bounded basin containing hundreds of metres of Tertiary and Quaternary sediments derived from lacustrine, paludal, and

Setting MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS I AND J INITIAL STUDY 5. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Issue

Waterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland

Surface Processes Focus on Mass Wasting (Chapter 10)

A surficial. P^HiHI waste disposal site, Bureau County, Illinois. east of the Sheffield low-level radioactive. electrical resistivity survey

Soil Sampling Results Former Truck Maintenance Garage

June 13, 2018 Project No E001. Issaquah School District 565 Northwest Holly Street Issaquah, Washington 98027

MEMORANDUM. wa.tsr..-z.n~.e.s-t.i~at.i.o.ns... Branch... Mr. Webster contends that prior to excavation of the gravel

SD-100 SD-200 SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN SODO SEGMENT. FIG. 3 Sheet 4 of 9. Seattle Monorail Project Seattle, Washington Scale in Feet

Land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal in Hanoi, Vietnam

RIVERS, GROUNDWATER, AND GLACIERS

WATER ON AND UNDER GROUND. Objectives. The Hydrologic Cycle

Clyde River Landslide

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

Mark S. Nordberg Geology and Groundwater Investigations Section North Central Region Office California Department of Water Resources

On-Site Soils Investigation. Buttermilk Way Storm water Treatment Project Buzzards Bay. MA. February 28 th, 2012

For Sale at $437,500.00

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Moosehead Lake and the Tale of Two Rivers

Surficial Geology of Antioch Quadrangle

APPENDIX C. Supplemental Information on Aquifer Properties

C) D) 3. Which graph best represents the relationship between soil particle size and the rate at which water infiltrates permeable soil?

4. The map below shows a meandering stream. Points A, B, C, and D represent locations along the stream bottom.

Senior Thesis. BY Calliope A. Voiklis 2000

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Connecticut's Aquifers

For Sale - 56 Acre Sandstone Quarry State Route 511, Oberlin/Kipton, OH 44075

SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California

Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Cedar River Alluvial Aquifer Flow System, Cedar Rapids, Iowa

NOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Hydrogeology of Karst NE Wisconsin. Dr. Maureen A. Muldoon UW-Oshkosh Geology Department

Geophysical Exploration in Water Resources Assessment. John Mundell, P.E., L.P.G., P.G. Ryan Brumbaugh, L.P.G. Mundell & Associates, Inc.

Geologic Considerations of Shallow SAGD Caprock; Seal Capacity, Seal Geometry and Seal Integrity, Athabasca Oilsands, Alberta Canada

The Soils and Land Capability for Agriculture. Land North of Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Jim Turenne. Soils on Social Media

FORM A GEOGRAPHY 1114 LABORATORY FINAL EXAM Teaching Assistant SAMPLE Lab Meeting. Place all answers on the answer sheet; 2 points per question

Page 1. Name:

Transcription:

August 21, 2015 Project No. EH130228A Concrete Nor West P.O. Box 280 Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 Attention: Mr. Dan Cox Subject: Hydrogeologic Site Assessment Concrete Nor West Grip Road Mine Skagit County, Washington Dear Mr. Cox: PURPOSE The purpose of this letter report is to provide a hydrogeologic site assessment for the proposed Concrete Nor West Grip Road Mine (Site) in Skagit County, Washington. The Grip Road Mine is located within a portion of the north ½ of the southeast ¼ of Section 27, Township 36 north, Range 4 east. The location of the mine and vicinity is shown of the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. BACKGROUND Concrete Nor West is currently applying for a mining special use permit from Skagit County for the development of the Site as a surface mine for aggregate resources. The Site will be dry mined using standard surface mining equipment such as front end loaders and excavators. The mined resource will be loaded into trucks and transported to market. The maximum depth of the mine is proposed to be a minimum of 10 feet above the seasonal high ground water elevation beneath the site. It is possible that water right exempt quantities of ground water may be used at the site for industrial and/or domestic (i.e. drinking water) during the operation of the mine. The proposed mine will be accessed via an existing gated private forest road from Grip Road located approximately 0.7 miles east of the intersection of Grip Road and Prairie Road (Figure 1). Upon initial review of Concrete Nor West s application for a mining special use permit, Skagit County determined that the Site is located within an aquifer recharge zone and a hydrogeologic site assessment was required under Skagit County Code (SCC) 14.24.330 and 14.16.330 (8).

SITE CONDITIONS The Site is located on a relatively flat terrace that slopes gently from a ground surface elevation slightly less than 250 feet (relative to mean-sea level [msl]) in the southeast portion of the Site to approximately 200 feet msl along the northern mine boundary (Figure 1). The terrace is approximately 50 to 75 feet above the Samish River valley floor in the eastern portion of the Site. Mean annual precipitation at the Site is approximately 45 inches per year (in/yr) based on the 30-year period of 1981-2010 in the Parameter-Elevation Relationships on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM, Daly and others, 1994). Precipitation values from PRISM are consistent with those in the Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) for the Site location. Evapotranspiration for the existing forested condition at the Site was estimated at approximately 21 in/yr using WWHM. Soils Soils in Skagit County were mapped by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) in the 1980s (NRCS, 1989). Site soils are mapped as predominately Skipopa silt loam, a somewhat poorly drained soil on terraces. Although the permeability of this soil is generally low, runoff is slow and the hazard of water erosion is slight due to the relatively flat slope (NRCS, 1989). Geology Detailed descriptions of the surficial and subsurface geology of the Site and vicinity are presented in a technical report (Open File Reports 98-5) completed by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR, 1998). Site geology was also evaluated as part of a resource evaluations conducted by Concrete Nor West (CNW, 2003) and AESI (AESI, 2011). The surficial geology of the Site and vicinity is presented on the Site and Geology Map, Figure 2; Geologic Cross Section A-A, Figure 3; and Geologic Cross Section B-B, Figure 4. The geology of the Site and vicinity consists predominantly of Sumas-age recessional glacial outwash sand and gravel (Qgos), Everson age glaciomarine drift (silt and clay, Qgdme), Vashonage glacial till (Qgtv), Vashon-age advance outwash (Qgav), and Quaternary river valley alluvium and alluvial fan deposits (Qa(s) and Qaf). The Qgos is the predominant geologic unit present at the ground surface at the Site (Figure 3). Qgtv is exposed at the ground surface on the slope faces located north and east of the proposed mine boundary, as well as to the south. Qgdme is exposed at the ground surface north, south and west of the proposed mine boundary. The Qgos unit is comprised of glacial fluvial sediments deposited by glacial meltwater during the Sumas Stade of glaciation approximately 10,000-12,000 years before present. The Qgos is described by DNR (1998) as a loose, brown to gray, moderately to well-sorted sandy cobbly gravel that can consist locally of gravelly medium to coarse sand, silty sand, sandy silt and silt. Stratigraphically, the Qgos is typically deposited on top of the Qgdme, which overly the Qgtv and Qgav. Explorations completed at the Site (CNW, 2003) indicate that most, if not all, of the Qgdme, and Qgtv that typically separates the Qgos from the Qgav was removed by erosion prior to and/or during the deposition of the Qgos (Figures 3 and 4). Thus, the stratigraphy beneath

the Site consists of coarse grained sand and gravel of the Qgos lying unconformably on top of the course grained sand and gravel of the Qgav (Figures 3 and 4). The maximum thickness of the Qgos beneath the Site appears to be approximately 70 feet, (CNW, 2003; Figure 4) and pinches out near southern mine boundary. The maximum thickness of the Qgav deposits beneath the Site is unknown as none of the explorations by Concrete Nor West (CNW, 2003) penetrated the Qgav into the pre-vashon nonglacial deposits that presumably underlie the Qgav. The maximum thickness of the Qgav in the area is thought to be approximately 175 feet (DNR, 1998). Hydrogeology The ground water table beneath the Site was measured during exploration drilling completed by Concrete Nor West in October, 2003. Ground water is present in unconsolidated sands and gravels in the lower portions of the Qgos and Qgav. The average depth to ground water was approximately 70 feet below the ground surface at elevations that range from approximately 145 to 155 feet (Figures 3 and 4). Approximate ground water elevation contours in the vicinity of the Site are presented on the Ground Water Contour Map, Figure 5. Ground Water Flow The ground water levels information and site topography indicate that ground water beneath the Site predominantly flows from south to north, although there is likely an easterly component of ground water flow near the eastern boundary of the proposed mine. Ground water within the Qgos/Qgav aquifer likely discharges to the alluvial sediments located in the Samish River Valley (Figure 5). Ground water within the alluvial sediments is presumably in hydraulic conductivity with the Samish River, meaning ground water would discharge as baseflow to the river when ground water elevations are higher than water levels in the river. There are no known springs or water supply wells located within 1,000 feet of the proposed mine boundary. An approximately 6,500 reach of the Samish River is located within 1,000 feet of the proposed mine boundary (Figures 1 and 3). Ground water beneath the Site likely discharges to the Samish River within that reach. Approximate locations of individual domestic and public water system wells located within 1-mile of the proposed mine boundary are presented on the Location of Water Supply Wells, Figure 6. There are no wells located within 1,000 feet of the Site or hydraulically down gradient between the proposed mine boundary and the presumed ground water discharge location of the Samish River. Aquifer Properties Regional studies (USGS, 2009; USGS 2011) suggest hydraulic conductivities in alluvial and glacial outwash aquifers in the vicinity of the site are likely around 50 feet per day (ft/d) (transmissivity of 5,000 ft 2 /d for a 100-ft thick aquifer) but may range locally from approximately 1 to 1,000 ft/d. Specific storage in the aquifer is likely on the order of 0.15 ft/ft. The porosity of a wellgraded mixture of sand and gravel like has been observed in the aquifer materials beneath the site is approximately 30% (Fetter, 1994). Our analysis of grain-size data collected by Concrete

Nor West (CNW, 2003) indicate vertical infiltration rates in the unsaturated Qgos/Qgav sediments are likely in the range of 2 to 20 inches per hour. Ground Water Quantity The potential for adverse impacts to ground water quantity beneath the site under the proposal is very low. There are no new water supply wells currently proposed for the mining operation, although it is possible that water right exempt quantities of ground water may be used at the site for industrial and/or domestic (i.e. drinking water) in the future. Ground water recharge for the existing site conditions is estimated at approximately 24 to 28 inches per year based on output from the WWHM and regression equations in Vacarro, et. al, (1998). The proposal will create a closed depression and all stormwater generated on site will be captured within the mine boundary and infiltrated. This would likely result in a slight increase ground water recharge at the site and, consequently, a slight increase in ground water levels and ground water contributions to the Samish River. Ground Water Quality The potential risk to ground water quality under the proposal is very low. The proposed mine will maintain a 10 feet buffer of natural material between the base of mine and typical seasonal high ground water levels at all times. The proposal is for a surface mining operation with on-site processing limited to stock piles and dry screening. Standard surface mining equipment such as front end loaders and excavators will be used to extract the material and load it on to trucks. The proposal will create a closed topographic depression. All stormwater generated on site will be captured within the mine boundary and infiltrated. Stormwater management will be conducted in accordance with Ecology s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Sand and Gravel General Permit. Fueling and maintenance of all on-site equipment will be conducted using mobile services under an approved Spill Control Plan. No permanent fueling or maintenance facilities are proposed for the Site. CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this hydrogeologic assessment was to address requirements for a mining special use permit under Skagit County Code (SCC) 14.24.330 and 14.16.330 (8). Ground water is present beneath the site at a depth of approximately 70 feet, at an elevation of approximately 145 to 155 feet (msl). Ground water beneath the site generally flows to the north and/or northeast and presumably discharges to Samish River, located a minimum of 200 feet from the proposed mine boundary. There are no water supply wells located down gradient of the proposed mine, between the mine boundary and the Samish River. The proposal is for a dry, surface mining operation, with limited on-site processing. The potential for a negative impact to ground water quantity and/or quality from the proposed mining activities is low.

REFERENCES AESI, 2011, Draft Technical Memorandum, Summary of Grip Road Mine Geology and Aggregate Quantity/Quality, From Charles, S. Lindsay L.G., L.Hg, to Brad Barton Concrete Nor West, October 21, 2011. CNW, 3003, Resource Analysis for Trillium Grip Road Property, Skagit County T36N R4E, Sec 28, Concrete Nor West Memo from Ken Coats to Walt Miles, Frank Miles, Brad Barton, and Mike Crawford, October 30, 2003. Daly, C., Neilson, R.P., and Philips, D.L., 1994, A Statistical-topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain, Journal of Applied Meteorology, v. 33, pp 140-158. DNR, 1998, Geologic Map and Interpreted Geologic History of the Bow and Alger 7.5-minute Quadrangles, Western Skagit County, Washington, prepared by Dragovich, J.D., Norman, D.K., Grisamer, C.L., Logan, R.L., and Anderson, G., Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Open File Report 98-5, September 1998. Fetter, 1994, Applied Hydrogeology, 3 rd ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1994. NRCS, 1989, Soil Survey of Skagit County Area, Washington, U.S, Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Issued September 1989. USGS, 2011, Numerical Simulation of the Groundwater-Flow System in Tributary Subbasins and Vicinity, Lower Skagit River Basin, Skagit and Snohomish Counties, Washington, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5184, Version 1.1, March 2011. USGS, 2009, Hydrogeologic Framework, Groundwater Movement, and Water Budget in Tributary Subbasins and Vicinity, Lower Skagit River Basin, Skagit and Snohomish Counties, Washington, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5270.

5 SITE Document Path: H:\GIS_Projects\aYear2013\130228 Concrete Norwest Grip\mxd\130228 Fig1 ProjectVicinity.mxd REFERENCE: USGS, SKAGIT CO NOTE: BLACK AND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO INCORRECT INTERPRETATION. Copyright: 2013 National Geographic Society, FEET i-cubed VICINITY MAP CONCRETE NOR'WEST - GRIP ROAD MINE SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON ± 0 2000 4000 FIGURE 1 DATE 8/15 PROJ. NO. KE130228A

140 Qa(s) 140 Qaf LEGEND BORING 2003, GROUND WATER ELEVATION 160 CROSS SECTION 160 PROPOSED MINE BOUNDARY 160 180 PARCEL BOUNDARY 20 FT CONTOUR SIT E 200 5 FT CONTOUR A' Qa(s) - ALLUVIUM Qaf - ALLUVIUM - FAN DEPOSITS B B-4 B-6 220 B-5 Qa(s) Qgo(s) - FLUVIAL OUTWASH Qgdm(e) - GLACIOMARINE DRIFT Qgom(e) - GLACIOMARINE OUTWASH Qgt(v) - TILL Qga(v) - ADVANCE OUTWASH 220 Qgo(s) B-1 240 B-2 SAM I SH R IV ER NOTE: The LiDAR DEM grid cell size is 6'.The elevation units are in feet. The data is in WA State Plane North Coordinate System FIPS 4601, in the NAD83(HARN)/NAVD88 datum. B' Qa(s) Document Path: H:\GIS_Projects\aYear2013\130228 Concrete Norwest Grip\mxd\Grip_Geologyr0815.mxd Qgdm(e) A REFERENCE: PSLC, WADNR OFR 98-5, SKAGIT CO., CONCRETE NOR'WEST (SEMRAU ENGINEERING) B-7 260 300 340 280 320 240 B-3 NOTE: BLACK AND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO INCORRECT INTERPRETATION. 300 SITE AND GEOLOGY MAP CONCRETE NOR'WEST - GRIP ROAD MINE SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON Qgt(v) 260 280 Qga(v) ± 0 150 300 FEET FIGURE 2 DATE 8/15 PROJ. NO. EH130228A

Qa(s) LEGEND 140 140 Qaf 160 BORING 2003, GROUND WATER ELEVATION @ AT TIME OF EXPLORATION GROUND WATER FLOW DIRECTION INFERRED GROUND WATER CONTOUR 160 @ 160 180 CROSS SECTION PROPOSED MINE BOUNDARY SIT E 200 PARCEL BOUNDARY A' 20 FT CONTOUR 5 FT CONTOUR B B-4 145' B-6 146' 220 B-5 Qa(s) Qa(s) - ALLUVIUM Qaf - ALLUVIUM - FAN DEPOSITS Qgo(s) - FLUVIAL OUTWASH Qgdm(e) - GLACIOMARINE DRIFT Qgdm(e) A B-7 153' @ 240 Qgom(e) - GLACIOMARINE OUTWASH Document Path: H:\GIS_Projects\aYear2013\130228 Concrete Norwest Grip\mxd\Grip_GWcontour0815.mxd 220 260 300 Qgo(s) REFERENCE: PSLC, WADNR OFR 98-5, SKAGIT CO., CONCRETE NOR'WEST (SEMRAU ENGINEERING) 340 B-1 147' @ 280 320 240 B-3 148' 150' B-2 145' NOTE: BLACK AND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO INCORRECT INTERPRETATION. GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP CONCRETE NOR'WEST - GRIP ROAD MINE SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON B' Qgt(v) SAM I SH R IV ER 260 280 Qa(s) Qga(v) Qgt(v) - TILL Qga(v) - ADVANCE OUTWASH NOTE: The LiDAR DEM grid cell size is 6'.The elevation units are in feet. The data is in WA State Plane North Coordinate System FIPS 4601, in the NAD83(HARN)/NAVD88 datum. ± 0 150 300 FEET FIGURE 5 DATE 8/15 PROJ. NO. EH130228A

LEGEND #* WATER SUPPLY WELL PLOTTED TO CENTER OF PARCEL 1 MILE FROM PROPOSED MINE BOUNDARY 1000' FROM PROPOSED MINE BOUNDARY PROPOSED MINE BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY Document Path: H:\GIS_Projects\aYear2013\130228 Concrete Norwest Grip\mxd\Grip_WaterSupplyWells0815.mxd REFERENCE: BING 2011, SKAGIT CO., CONCRETE NOR'WEST (SEMRAU ENGINEERING) SIT E NOTE: BLACK AND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO INCORRECT INTERPRETATION. LOCATION OF WATER SUPPLY WELLS CONCRETE NOR'WEST - GRIP ROAD MINE SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON SAM I SH R IV ER Qas ± 0 500 1000 FEET FIGURE 6 DATE 8/15 PROJ. NO. EH130228A