PO Box 680 Monument, Co / appliedweatherassociates.com. Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP)

Similar documents
MIDWEST PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION STUDIES

Updating Probable Maximum Precipitation for the Tennessee Valley Authority

Probable Maximum Precipitation Study

Presented by Jerry A. Gomez, P.E. National Hydropower Association Northeast Regional Meeting - September 17, 2009

Dam Safety: Revisiting PMPs

Arizona Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP), Improving HMR 49

Using PRISM Climate Grids and GIS for Extreme Precipitation Mapping

Updating PMP to Provide Better Dam and Spillway Design

Bill Kappel. Doug Hultstrand. Applied Weather Associates

Site-Specific and Regional PMP Studies

The general procedure for estimating 24-hour PMP includes the following steps:

The NEXRAD Revolution: Scientific Basis for Updating the HMR-49 Statistical Storm Intensities and PMPs

Study 16.5 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)

TEMPORAL DISTIRUBTION OF PMP RAINFALL AS A FUNCTION OF AREA SIZE. Introduction

Needs to Update Probable Maximum Precipitation for Determining Hydrologic Loading on Dams

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY AEA REP Appendix A. Probable Maximum Precipitation Study REP. Applied Weather Associates

This page left intentionally blank

Study 16.5 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)

Comparison of physical and statistical methods for estimating probable maximum precipitation in southwestern basins of Iran

3B.3: Climate Controls on the Extreme Rainstorms in the Contiguous US:

NRC Workshop Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment (PFHA) Jan 29-31, Mel Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. MGS Engineering Consultants, Inc.

Changes to Extreme Precipitation Events: What the Historical Record Shows and What It Means for Engineers

Speakers: NWS Buffalo Dan Kelly and Sarah Jamison, NERFC Jeane Wallace. NWS Flood Services for the Black River Basin

Estimating Probable Maximum Precipitation for Linau River Basin in Sarawak

Estimation of the probable maximum precipitation in Barcelona (Spain)

The Hydrologic Cycle: How Do River Forecast Centers Measure the Parts?

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update

Upper Missouri River Basin December 2017 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast December 5, 2017

Talk Overview. Concepts. Climatology. Monitoring. Applications

Operational Hydrologic Ensemble Forecasting. Rob Hartman Hydrologist in Charge NWS / California-Nevada River Forecast Center

APPENDIX B HYDROLOGY

sea levels 100 year/ payments. FIGURE 1

Ed Tomlinson, PhD Bill Kappel Applied Weather Associates LLC. Tye Parzybok Metstat Inc. Bryan Rappolt Genesis Weather Solutions LLC

An Overview of Operations at the West Gulf River Forecast Center Gregory Waller Service Coordination Hydrologist NWS - West Gulf River Forecast Center

Areal Reduction Factors for the Colorado Front Range and Analysis of the September 2013 Colorado Storm

The Stochastic Event Flood Model Applied to Minidoka Dam on the Snake River, Idaho

Colorado September Rainfall Analysis: Comparisons to the Calgary 2013 Rainfall and PMP Along the Rocky Mountain Front Range

Module 11: Meteorology Topic 5 Content: Weather Maps Notes

National Wildland Significant Fire Potential Outlook

Hydrologic Research Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Davis

A 21st century HRRR-based approach to estimating probable maximum precipitation to enhance dam safety and community resilience

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Tutorial 10 - PMP Estimation

Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105th Meridian

Upper Missouri River Basin February 2018 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast February 6, 2018

Operational Perspectives on Hydrologic Model Data Assimilation

Another 100-Year Storm. October 26, 2016 Mark Dennis, PE, CFM

Areal Reduction Factors for the Colorado Front Range and Analysis of the September 2013 Colorado Storm

2003 Moisture Outlook

Bill Kappel

Design Storms for Hydrologic Analysis

FEMA Hazards Loss Modeling Task Force (MOTF) Situation Report #14. Colorado Spring Flood Risk ***FINAL REPORT***

Detailed Storm Rainfall Analysis for Hurricane Ivan Flooding in Georgia Using the Storm Precipitation Analysis System (SPAS) and NEXRAD Weather Radar

David R. Vallee Hydrologist-in-Charge NOAA/NWS Northeast River Forecast Center

Results of Intensity-Duration- Frequency Analysis for Precipitation and Runoff under Changing Climate

NRC Workshop - Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment Jan 2013

GENERALISED LONG DURATION PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION (PMP) ISOHYETAL MAP FOR PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

WWA Summer Tour. Tuesday, June 20, Lander, Wyoming. Contents. Final Water Forum for Snowcover & Stream flow Generation

Recent Updates to NOAA/NWS Precipitation Frequency Estimates

THE NEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL SPILLWAY AT THE SANFORD DAM BOILING SPRING LAKES, NC. Presentation for The Brunswick County Commissioners April 20, 2015

Wyoming Pre-Workshop Survey Results August 27, 2015 Lander Wyoming

National Wildland Significant Fire Potential Outlook

Solution: The ratio of normal rainfall at station A to normal rainfall at station i or NR A /NR i has been calculated and is given in table below.

Doug Kluck NOAA Kansas City, MO National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI) National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS)

JEFF JOHNSON S Winter Weather Outlook

Maximization of Historical Severe Precipitation Events over American, Yuba and Feather River Basins

Radar Analysis for Design Storm Application

Storm Precipitation Analysis System (SPAS) Description. Introduction

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

Arizona Climate Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF A LARGE-SCALE HYDROLOGIC PREDICTION SYSTEM

Model Output Statistics (MOS)

Flooding in Western North Carolina: Some Spatial, Hydrologic, and Seasonal Characteristics CAUTION!! Outline. Basic Flood Facts.

Benjamin J. Moore. Education. Professional experience

MJO Discussion. Eric Maloney Colorado State University. Thanks: Matthew Wheeler, Adrian Matthews, WGNE MJOTF

NWS SERFC Hydrologic Vulnerability Assessment. Monday, March 9 th, 2015 NOAA, National Weather Service Southeast River Forecast Center

Robert Shedd Northeast River Forecast Center National Weather Service Taunton, Massachusetts, USA

Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL September 9, 2014

Surface Processes Focus on Mass Wasting (Chapter 10)

PRMS WHITE PAPER 2014 NORTH ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON OUTLOOK. June RMS Event Response

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 3.1 Synoptic Patterns Precipitation and Topography Precipitation Regionalization... 11

Trends in the Character of Hurricanes and their Impact on Heavy Rainfall across the Carolinas

Issue 44: Phase II & III H&H Issues Date: 07/03/2006 Page 1

Area-Depth Studies for Thunderstorm Rainfall in Illinois

Stochastic Modeling of Extreme Floods on the American River at Folsom Dam

How Will the Colorado Run? The Colorado River in a Warmer World

JP 2.8 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF TROPICAL CYCLONE INDUCED PRECIPITATION AND OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA

National Weather Service. Harold H. Opitz Hydrologist in Charge

Tropical Update. 5 AM EDT Tuesday, September 12, 2017 Post-Tropical Cyclone Irma, Hurricane Jose, & Tropical Wave (10%)

C o p e r n i c u s E m e r g e n c y M a n a g e m e n t S e r v i c e f o r e c a s t i n g f l o o d s

USSD Conference, Denver 2016

Ground Water Protection Council 2017 Annual Forum Boston, Massachusetts. Ben Binder (303)

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

Combining Deterministic and Probabilistic Methods to Produce Gridded Climatologies

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System December 11, 2018

Operational water balance model for Siilinjärvi mine

David R. Vallee Hydrologist in Charge NWS/Northeast River Forecast Center

Arizona Drought Monitoring Sensitivity and Verification Analyses

Arizona Cloud Seeding Efforts: A Salt River Project Perspective. James Walter SRP Surface Water Resources CPWAC/CPWP Joint Meeting March 30, 2018

Transcription:

PO Box 680 Monument, Co 80132 719/488-9117 appliedweatherassociates.com Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP)

Probable Maximum Precipitation Introduction Concept of Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Definition i. Theoretical values ii. Maximum depth of precipitation iii. Physically possible iv. Geographic region v. Certain time of year History of Hydrometeorological Reports (HMRs) Concept of Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Concept of an upper limit to precipitation potential Corps of Engineers requested charts of Maximum Possible Precipitation, MPP (1946) HMR 23 (1947) provided subjectively derived estimates Derived from the most effective combination of factors controlling rainfall intensity MPP changed to Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Better reflects the uncertainty of estimating maximum precipitation PMP values are generally considered estimates of the upper limit of precipitation production

Probable Maximum Precipitation Definition: The theoretically greatest depth of precipitation for a given duration that is physically possible over a given storm area at a particular geographic location at a certain time of year (HMR 59, 1999) Probable Maximum Precipitation Definition: The theoretically greatest depth of precipitation for a given duration that is physically possible over a given storm area at a particular geographic location at a certain time of year (HMR 59, 1999)

Probable Maximum Precipitation Theoretically - No technology exists to compute theoretical maximum precipitation values - Historic storms are used as the basis for computing maximum rainfall values - Procedures are used to adjust the observed rainfall from historic large rainfall events to determine the theoretical maximum rainfall - Meteorological computer models are providing useful tools for evaluating orographic effects = Spatial distribution are provided = Not useful for determing upper limit magnitudes Probable Maximum Precipitation Definition: The theoretically greatest depth of precipitation for a given duration that is physically possible over a given storm area at a particular geographic location at a certain time of year (HMR 59, 1999)

Probable Maximum Precipitation greatest depth of precipitation -Greatest depth for various area sizes and various durations = Area sizes: 1 to 20,000 square miles* = Durations: 1 to 72 hours* -Can be for all seasons (all season PMP) or for times of the year when there may be snow cover or frozen ground (cool season PMP) -Can vary by storm type = Local Storm = General Storm * PMP studies are not limited to 20,000 sq mi and/or 72-hour duration Probable Maximum Precipitation Definition: The theoretically greatest depth of precipitation for a given duration that is physically possible over a given storm area at a particular geographic location at a certain time of year (HMR 59, 1999)

Probable Maximum Precipitation physically possible - The PMP design storm must have characteristics that can combine naturally to produce an extreme rainfall storm - Many worst case storm characteristics cannot co-occur within an extreme rainfall storm - Some historic PMP analyses have inappropriately combined worst case storm characteristics Probable Maximum Precipitation Definition: The theoretically greatest depth of precipitation for a given duration that is physically possible over a given storm area at a particular geographic location at a certain time of year (HMR 59, 1999)

Probable Maximum Precipitation geographic location The PMP design storm type varies depending on the geographic location The PMP design storm type depends on basin characteristics In general small rapid response basins have the convective storm type as the PMP storm In general large basins with large lag times have the general storm type as the PMP storm Gradients of PMP values are not homogeneous for various geographic locations Probable Maximum Precipitation HMR 51

Probable Maximum Precipitation HMR 59 Probable Maximum Precipitation Break #1 Questions

Probable Maximum Precipitation

Probable Maximum Precipitation HMR 51

Method for Computing PMP Values No physically based theoretical method (yet) Observed extreme rainfall events are used Standard procedures are applied to the storm rainfall Primary steps Storm Search Identification of most significant storms Maximization procedures are applied Transpositioning procedures are applied Enveloping procedures are applied

Probable Maximum Precipitation Storm search Short list of significant storms Storm rainfall analyses (Depth-Area-Duration) Rainfall timing (mass curves) Storm in-place maximization Storm transposition Moisture transposition Elevation moisture adjustment Orographic transposition Depth-Area envelopment Depth-Duration envelopment Key Tasks for Site-Specific PMP Studies Identify extreme storms for the region Identify recent extreme storms Add 40 years of storms for HMR 51 region Review older rainfall data records HMRs may not have included all significant storms

Updated Storm Search Locations New Storms Analyzed for PMP Development

New Storms Analyzed for PMP Development New Storms Analyzed for PMP Development

Key Tasks for Site-Specific PMP Studies Identify extreme storm types Evaluate the use of HMR procedures for each storm type Identify unique topography Moisture depletion by upwind barriers Precipitation enhancement/decrease Effects on storm center location Review HMR procedures used for the basin location Identify inconsistent assumptions Probable Maximum Precipitation Break #2 Questions

Method for Computing PMP Values Maximization Storm rainfall production depends on Storm rainfall production efficiency Available atmospheric moisture Assumptions For a sufficiently long period of record, storms will be identified that have approached maximum rainfall production efficiencies The storm rainfall could have been greater is more atmospheric moisture had been available Procedure Determine the amount of atmospheric moisture that was available to the storm Determine the maximum amount of moisture that could have been available to the storm Increase the rainfall by a ratio of maximum moisture to actual moisture Called the storm maximization factor Use of a trajectory model

Updated Maximum Dew Point Climatology Updated Maximum Dew Point Climatology Map

Updated 2 Sigma SST Map Method for Computing PMP Values Transpositioning The largest storms over a region are identified The transposition region contains storm that are similar Meteorologically Climatologically Topographically The rainfall from each storm is adjusted to other parts of the region The adjustment is the transpositioning factor

Method for Computing PMP Values Enveloping For any location in a region The maximized and transpositioned Depth-Area (D-A) rainfall is plotted for each storm for each duration For each duration, an envelop curve is constructed that envelopes the rainfall values at each area size The D-A envelop curve procedure insures continuity in space i.e. The rainfall at each area size has continuity with smaller and larger area sizes The same procedure is followed for the Depth-Duration (D-D) rainfall plots The D-D envelop curve procedure insures continuity in time i.e. The rainfall at each duration has continuity with shorter and longer durations Area Enveloping

Duration Enveloping Probable Maximum Precipitation Break #3 Questions

Probable Maximum Precipitation Generalized PMP values (HMRs) Site-Specific PMP values Regional Statewide Individual basins Examples of Site-Specific PMP Study Findings Storm Maximization Storm representative dew point (SST) Historic analyses have selected dew points (SST) Hundreds of miles away Occurred during or after the rainfall event Time period of observations were not consistent with the rainfall duration Maximum dew point (SST) climatology used was unreliable Maximization ratios of 2.0 or greater were used

Examples of Site-Specific PMP Study Findings Storm Maximization, Dew point Analyses 12-hour vs 6-hour persisting dew points 12-hour persisting vs 6-hour average Observed dew point values Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Td 68 67 69 69 72 75 75 74 75 73 70 69 68 65 66 65 65 65 67 66! Rainfall Event! 12-hour persisting: 65 6-hour persisting: 72 6-hour average: 74 Examples of Site-Specific PMP Study Findings Maximum Dew point Climatology Published NOAA Climatology Combination of several analyses Not well documented Represented maximum observed values New climatology can be produced Long period of record of quality controlled data Return frequencies can be computed Climatologies of persisting and average values can be provided

Updated Dew Point Climatologies Examples of Site-Specific PMP Study Findings Homogeneous Climate Regions Select storms for each region Transposition Maximize Envelop

Probable Maximum Precipitation HMR 51 Recalculation of the Distance from the Coast curve in HMR 51

Statewide PMP Study Results vshmr 51 Statewide PMP Study Results vs HMR 51

Statewide PMP Study Results vs HMR 51 Statewide PMP Study Results vs HMR 51

Probable Maximum Precipitation Types of PMP studies: Generalized (Hydrometeorological Reports) Regional (EPRI Michigan/Wisconsin 1993) Statewide (Nebraska 2008, Arizona, Ohio, Wyoming) Site-Specific Results from Selected Site-Specific PMP Studies Wisconsin/Michigan Accepted by FERC Great Miami River, Ohio Accepted by Ohio State Engineer Catawba-Wateree Rivers, Carolinas Not accepted by FERC Williams Fork River, Colorado Accepted by FERC & Colorado State Engineer

Results from Selected Site-Specific PMP Studies Muddy Creek, Colorado Accepted by Colorado State Engineer Elkhead Creek, Colorado Accepted by Colorado State Engineer Broomfield Reservoir, Colorado Accepted by Colorado State Engineer Chelan Reservoir, Washington Study suspended Results from Selected Site-Specific PMP Studies Nebraska Statewide Accepted by Nebraska Dam Safety office FERC acceptance pending Brassua Dam drainage basin, Maine Accepted by the FERC Bleinheim-Gilboa Reservoir, New York Accepted by the FERC Lewis River drainage basin, Washington Accepted by the FERC

Recently Completed PMP Studies Do Regional/Statewide/Site-Specific PMP Studies Provide Improved PMP Values? Attributes: More storms considered New technologies used Recognized problems in the HMRs corrected Topographic features addressed

Do Regional/Statewide/Site-Specific PMP Studies Provide Improved PMP Values? Primary Question: Do the PMP values resulting from a sitespecific/statewide PMP study better represent the upper physical limit of extreme rainfall as required by the definition of PMP? Should a Particular Regional/Statewide/Site- Specific PMP Study be Accepted by a Regulator? Problem: Most regulators do not have access to a staff hydrometeorologist Potential Solution: Review by a government hydrometeorology office Review by a peer reviewer Review by an independent Board of Consultants (BOC) FERC BOC Meteorologist Hydrologist Civil Engineer

ASDSO Webinar Probable Maximum Precipitation Questions Comments 719/488-9117 awaadmin@comcast.net PO Box 680 Monument, Co 80132 http://appliedweatherassociates.com/ Post Event Evaluation & Quiz Please click the following link to take the Seminar Evaluation and Quiz: http://eo2.commpartners.com/users/asdso/posttest.ph p?id=8097 You must complete the Seminar Evaluation and Quiz to receive PDH credit hours