A substructuring FE model for reduction of structural acoustic problems with dissipative interfaces

Similar documents
A 3 D finite element model for sound transmission through a double plate system with isotropic elastic porous materials

Mecanum. Acoustic Materials: Characterization. We build silence. Mecanum Inc.

1817. Research of sound absorption characteristics for the periodically porous structure and its application in automobile

Analytical and experimental study of single frame double wall

Vibration Transmission in Complex Vehicle Structures

Efficient Reduced Order Modeling of Low- to Mid-Frequency Vibration and Power Flow in Complex Structures

COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENT, FINITE ELEMENT AND WAVE BASED MODELS FOR MASS INCLUSIONS IN PORO-ELASTIC LAYERS

Numerical Simulation of Vibroacoustic Problems. by the Modal Synthesis

Validity of the limp model for porous materials: A criterion based on the Biot theory

Analogy Electromagnetism - Acoustics: Validation and Application to Local Impedance Active Control for Sound Absorption

Simulation of acoustic and vibroacoustic problems in LS-DYNA using boundary element method ABSTRACT:

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

TRANSMISSION LOSS OF EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM PANELS WITH ORTHOTROPIC CORES

ACTRAN Modules. Products overview. Copyright Free Field Technologies

Acoustics Analysis of Speaker ANSYS, Inc. November 28, 2014

Transmission loss of rectangular silencers using meso-porous and micro-perforated linings

Simulation of Acoustic and Vibro-Acoustic Problems in LS-DYNA using Boundary Element Method

IMPROVING THE ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE OF EXPANSION CHAMBERS BY USING MICROPERFORATED PANEL ABSORBERS

Automated Multi-Level Substructuring CHAPTER 4 : AMLS METHOD. Condensation. Exact condensation

A SIMPLIFIED NUMERICAL MODEL FOR A PLATE BACKED BY A THIN FOAM LAYER IN THE LOW FREQUENCY RANGE

Improved Method of the Four-Pole Parameters for Calculating Transmission Loss on Acoustics Silence

Porous layer impedance applied to a moving wall: application to the radiation

Hierarchical finite element modelling of Biot s equations for vibro-acoustic modelling of layered poroelastic media

Point Excitation of a Coupled Structural-Acoustical Tire Model with Experimental Verification

Side branch resonators modelling with Green s function methods

Improved near-wall accuracy for solutions of the Helmholtz equation using the boundary element method

An explicit time-domain finite-element method for room acoustics simulation

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Verification of Sound Absorption Characteristics Constituted Porous Structure

Effects of mass distribution and buoyancy on the sound radiation of a fluid loaded cylinder

BEM Methods for Acoustic and Vibroacoustic Problems in LS-DYNA

A numerical model for ground-borne vibrations from underground railway traffic based on a periodic FE-BE formulation

An indirect Trefftz method for the steady state dynamic analysis of coupled vibro acoustic systems

Transmission Loss of a Dissipative Muffler with Perforated Central Pipe

Partitioned Formulation with Localized Lagrange Multipliers And its Applications **

THE DEPENDENCE OF SOUND ABSORPTION BY AN ISOLATED ACOUSTIC RESONATOR ON THE RESONATOR S VOLUME

On measurement of mechanical properties of sound absorbing materials

Mechanical Vibrations Chapter 6 Solution Methods for the Eigenvalue Problem

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007

The measurement of complex acoustical properties of homogeneous materials by means of impulse response in a plane wave tube

A reciprocity relationship for random diffuse fields in acoustics and structures with application to the analysis of uncertain systems.

Structural Optimization. for Acoustic Disciplines

SDLV302 Modal analysis by under-structuring: bi-- supported beam

Sound radiation and sound insulation

PREDICTION OF ACOUSTIC NATURAL FREQUENCIES FOR TWO DIMENSIONAL SIMPLIFIED AIRCRAFT CABIN BY IMPEDANCE MOBILITY COMPACT MATRIX (IMCM) APPROACH

Perturbation of periodic equilibrium

Broadband Vibration Response Reduction Using FEA and Optimization Techniques

OPAC102. The Acoustic Wave Equation

This appendix gives you a working knowledge of the theory used to implement flexible bodies in ADAMS. The topics covered include

A Modal Approach to Lightweight Partitions with Internal Resonators

Virtual SEA for importing FEM information in SEA models

Prediction of High-frequency Vibro-acoustic Coupling in Anechoic Chamber Using Energy Finite Element Method and Energy Boundary Element Method

PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE

Noise in enclosed spaces. Phil Joseph

The Corrected Expressions for the Four-Pole Transmission Matrix for a Duct with a Linear Temperature Gradient and an Exponential Temperature Profile

EFFECTS OF PERMEABILITY ON SOUND ABSORPTION AND SOUND INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF ACOUSTIC CEILING PANELS

Time domain analysis of viscoelastic models

Muffler Transmission Loss Simple Expansion Chamber

Dynamic Response of Structures With Frequency Dependent Damping

Prediction of the radiated sound power from a fluid-loaded finite cylinder using the surface contribution method

New Developments of Frequency Domain Acoustic Methods in LS-DYNA

Acoustic radiation by means of an acoustic dynamic stiffness matrix in spherical coordinates

Experimental Verification of Various Modelling Techniques for Piezoelectric Actuated Panels

A methodology for a robust inverse identification of model parameters for porous sound absorbing materials

Porous Materials for Sound Absorption and Transmission Control

IMPROVED STRUCTURE-ACOUSTIC INTERACTION MODELS, PART II: MODEL EVALUATION Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon Republic of Korea

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Numerical Model of the Insertion Loss Promoted by the Enclosure of a Sound Source

Sound Pressure Generated by a Bubble

Efficient outdoor sound propagation modelling in time-domain

Acoustic contributions of a sound absorbing blanket placed in a double panel structure: Absorption versus transmission

The frequency and angular dependence of the absorption coefficient of common types of living plants

NUMERICAL IMPEDANCE MATRIX : APPLICATION TO THE HERSCHEL-QUINCKE TUBE CONCEPT

Sound Propagation in the Nocturnal Boundary Layer. Roger Waxler Carrick Talmadge Xiao Di Kenneth Gilbert

Finite-element modelling of fully-coupled active systems involving poroelasticity, piezoelectricity, elasticity, and acoustics

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE ACOUSTIC WAVES PROPAGATION IN A STANDING WAVE TUBE

The acoustic characterization of porous media and its standards

Transmission Matrix Model of a Quarter-Wave-Tube with Gas Temperature Gradients

Instabilities and Dynamic Rupture in a Frictional Interface

Sierra/SD: A Massively Parallel Finite Element Code for Structural Dynamics and Acoustics Analysis

Numerical analysis of sound insulation performance of double-layer wall with vibration absorbers using FDTD method

Identification of Noise Sources by Means of Inverse Finite Element Method

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF RUBBER VIBRATION ISOLATORS

Experimental investigation of perforations interactions effects under high sound pressure levels

FastBEM Acoustics. Verification Manual , Advanced CAE Research, LLC (ACR) Cincinnati, Ohio, USA All Rights Reserved

On the use of a loudspeaker for measuring the viscoelastic properties of sound absorbing materials

AN SEA-LIKE MODEL FOR DOUBLE WALLS FILLED WITH ABSORBING MATERIALS

IMPROVEMENT OF A STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION METHOD

Identification of the characteristic parameters of porous media using active control

Development of an analytical solution of modified Biot s equations for the optimization of lightweight acoustic protection

Investigation of Passive Control Devices for Potential Application to a Launch Vehicle Structure to Reduce the Interior Noise Levels During Launch

Shock factor investigation in a 3-D finite element model under shock loading

PIANO SOUNDBOARD UNDER PRESTRESS: A NUMERICAL APPROACH

Prediction of Light Rail Vehicle Noise in Running Condition using SEA

Transmission Matrix Model of a Quarter-Wave-Tube with Gas Temperature Gradients

Zonal modelling approach in aerodynamic simulation

FORMULAS OF ACOUSTICS

Improvement of Low Frequency Sound Absorption of Acoustical Materials

Acoustic design of lightweight cabin walls for cruise ships

A Novel Computational Model for Tilting Pad Journal Bearings with Soft Pivot Stiffness

Transcription:

A substructuring FE model for reduction of structural acoustic problems with dissipative interfaces PhD started October 2008 Romain RUMPLER Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers - Cnam Future ESR Fellow at KTH (July 2010) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 1 / 28

Motivations Noise reduction in the context of structural acoustic applications Continue W. Larbi s work at LMSSC on dissipative interfaces modelisation Extend to applications including 3D modelisation (porous media) Develop computation-efficient methods to treat large structural acoustic problems (reduction methods) Implement models into efficient / open source FE software: FEAP (R.L. Taylor), Fortran Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 2 / 28

Outline Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 3 / 28

(Us p F ) coupling element Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 4 / 28

(Us p F ) coupling element Elasto acoustic coupling: [U s,p F ] Problem equations:»» Kss K sθ ω 2 Mss K θs K θθ `ˆKF M θs M sθ M θθ Us θ s ω 2 ˆM F ˆpF Coupling on Γ sf through Neumann BC: f bs = f Fs = C sf p F f bθ = f Fθ = 0 f bf = f sf = ω 2 ρ 0 c 2 0 CT sf Us with: C sf = R Γ sf (N s) T nn F ds =» fbs f bθ = ˆf bf 1 2 3 1 2 3 Implementation - Frequency domain: 02 3 2 31 2 K ss K sθ C sf M ss M sθ 0 @ 4K θs K θθ 0 5 ω 2 4 5A 4 0 0 K F M θs M θθ 0 CsF T 0 K F U s θ s p F 3 2 5 = 4 f bs f bθ f bf 3 5 Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 5 / 28

(Us p F ) coupling element Elasto acoustic coupling: [U s,p F ] Problem equations:»» Kss K sθ ω 2 Mss K θs K θθ `ˆKF M θs M sθ M θθ Us θ s ω 2 ˆM F ˆpF Coupling on Γ sf through Neumann BC: f bs = f Fs = C sf p F f bθ = f Fθ = 0 f bf = f sf = ω 2 ρ 0 c 2 0 CT sf Us with: C sf = R Γ sf (N s) T nn F ds =» fbs f bθ = ˆf bf 1 2 3 1 2 3 Implementation - Frequency domain: 02 3 2 31 2 3 2 3 0 0 C sf 0 0 0 U s 0 @ 40 0 0 5 ω 2 4 0 0 05A 4θ s 5 = 405 0 0 0 CsF T 0 0 p F 0 Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 5 / 28

(Us p F ) coupling element Frequency response of a cavity coupled with a plate Elasto-acoustic coupled cavity: (1m 1m 1m) cavity (10 10 10) acoustic elements (1m 1m) plate on one face (10 10) shell elements (10 10) quad coupling elts Normal unit excitation force Coupled cavity mesh: F 1 2 3 Mean quadratic velocity of plate (db) Mean quadratic velocity of plate coupled with cavity (Panneton) 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 0 100 200 300 400 500 Frequency (Hz) [R. Panneton, Modélisation numérique tridimensionnelle par éléments finis des milieux poroélastiques, Ph.D Thesis, 1996] Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 6 / 28

(us u f ) porous element Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 7 / 28

(us u f ) porous element Us-Uf porous element implementation with: Implementation - Frequency domain:»» Kss K sf ω 2 Mss M sf us = K fs K ff M ss = ρ ss RΩ P N T s NsdV M ff = ρ ff RΩ P N T f N f dv M sf = ρ sf R Ω P N T s N f dv = M T fs K ss = R Ω P ( N s) T D s N sdv K ff = R Ω P ( N f ) T D f N f dv M fs M ff u f» fbs f bf Material parameters: In vacuo frame: Es, ν, ρ s Fluid: ρ 0, γ, Pr, η, P 0 Biot porous: α, φ, σ, Λ, Λ K sf = R Ω P ( N s) T Q N f dv = K T sf f bs Neumann BC on frame f bf Neumann BC on fluid phase [J.- F. Allard, Propagation of Sound in Porous Media: Modelling Sound Absorbing Materials, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, London, 1993] Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 8 / 28

(us u f ) porous element Us-Uf porous element implementation with: Implementation - Frequency domain:»» Kss K sf ω 2 Mss M sf us = K fs K ff M ss = ρ ss RΩ P N T s NsdV M ff = ρ ff RΩ P N T f N f dv M sf = ρ sf R Ω P N T s N f dv = M T fs K ss = R Ω P ( N s) T D s N sdv K ff = R Ω P ( N f ) T D f N f dv K sf = R Ω P ( N s) T Q N f dv = K T sf f bs Neumann BC on frame f bf Neumann BC on fluid phase M fs M ff u f» fbs f bf Material parameters: In vacuo frame: Es, ν, ρ s Fluid: ρ 0, γ, Pr, η, P 0 Biot porous: α, φ, σ, Λ, Λ Detailed expressions: ρ ss = ρ s + ρ a iσφ 2 G(ω) ω ρ ff = φρ 0 + ρ a iσφ 2 G(ω) ω ρ sf = ρ a + iσφ 2 G(ω) ω with: ρ a = φρ 0 (α 1)» 1 G (ω) = 1 + 4iα2 ηρ 2 0ω σ 2 Λ 2 φ 2 Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 8 / 28

(us u f ) porous element Us-Uf porous element implementation with: Implementation - Frequency domain:»» Kss K sf ω 2 Mss M sf us = K fs K ff M ss = ρ ss RΩ P N T s NsdV M ff = ρ ff RΩ P N T f N f dv M sf = ρ sf R Ω P N T s N f dv = M T fs K ss = R Ω P ( N s) T D s N sdv K ff = R Ω P ( N f ) T D f N f dv M fs M ff u f» fbs f bf Material parameters: In vacuo frame: Es, ν, ρ s Fluid: ρ 0, γ, Pr, η, P 0 Biot porous: α, φ, σ, Λ, Λ Detailed expressions: σ s = D sε s + Qε f K sf = R Ω P ( N s) T Q N f dv = K T sf f bs Neumann BC on frame f bf Neumann BC on fluid phase σ f = Q T ε s + D f ε f with: D s (Es, ν, φ, γ, P 0,Λ, Λ, σ, α, η, ρ 0, ω,pr) D f (φ, γ, P 0,Λ,Λ, σ, α, η, ρ 0, ω, Pr) Q (φ, γ, P 0, Λ,Λ, σ, α, η, ρ 0, ω, Pr) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 8 / 28

(us u f ) porous element Normal incidence impedance of porous covered wall Poroelastic layer on rigid wall: Material properties: Infinite lateral dimensions Unit plane wave excitation / Normal incidence 7.62cm thick porous layer Problem illustration: Wall acoustic impedance (Pa.s/m) Frame Fluid Porous Es = 800.8kPa c 0 = 343m/s φ = 0.9 ν s = 0.4 γ = 1.4 σ = 25kNs/m 4 ρ s = 30kg/m 3 Pr = 0.71 α = 7.8 ρ 0 = 1.21kg/m 3 Λ = 226µm η = 1.84 10 5 Ns/m 2 Λ = 226µm 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0-1000 Wall acoustic normal incidence impedance Re(Z) Computed - 10 elmt Im(Z) Computed - 10 elmt Re(Z) Computed - 1 elmt Im(Z) Computed - 1 elmt Re(Z) Exact Im(Z) Exact 100 1000 Frequency (Hz) [J.-F. Deü, W. Larbi, R. Ohayon, Vibration and transient response of structural-acoustic interior coupled systems with dissipative interface, CMAME, 2008] Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 9 / 28

(us u f ) p F coupling element Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 10 / 28

(us u f ) p F coupling element Poro acoustic coupling: [(u s,u f ),p F ] Problem equations:»» Kss K sf ω 2 Mss K fs K ff `ˆKF M fs M sf M ff us u f ω 2 ˆM F ˆpF =» fbs f bf = ˆf bf Coupling on Γ PF through Neumann BC: f bs = f Fs = (1 φ)c sf p F f bf = f Ff = φc ff p F f bf = f PF = ω 2 ρ 0 c0 2 ``1 φ CT sf u s + φcff T u f with: C sf = R Γ (N PF s) T nn F ds C ff = R (N Γ f ) T nn F ds PF 1 2 3 1 2 3 Implementation - Frequency domain: 02 K ss K sf `1 3 2 31 2 3 2 3 φ C sf M ss M sf 0 u s f bs @ 4K fs K ff φc ff 5 ω 2 4 M fs M ff 0 5A 4u f 5 = 4f bf 5 0 0 K F (1 φ)csf T φcff T K F p F f bf Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 11 / 28

(us u f ) p F coupling element Poro acoustic coupling: [(u s,u f ),p F ] Problem equations:»» Kss K sf ω 2 Mss K fs K ff `ˆKF M fs M sf M ff us u f ω 2 ˆM F ˆpF =» fbs f bf = ˆf bf Coupling on Γ PF through Neumann BC: f bs = f Fs = (1 φ)c sf p F f bf = f Ff = φc ff p F f bf = f PF = ω 2 ρ 0 c0 2 ``1 φ CT sf u s + φcff T u f with: C sf = R Γ (N PF s) T nn F ds C ff = R (N Γ f ) T nn F ds PF 1 2 3 1 2 3 Implementation - Frequency domain: 02 0 0 `1 3 2 31 2 3 2 3 φ C sf 0 0 0 u s 0 @ 40 0 φc ff 5 ω 2 4 0 0 05A 4u f 5 = 405 0 0 0 (1 φ)csf T φcff T 0 p F 0 Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 11 / 28

(us u f ) p F coupling element Frequency response of partly treated rigid acoustic cavity Rigid cavity - partly covered: (0.4m 0.6m 0.75m) cavity (8 12 15) acoustic elements (0.4m 0.6m 0.05m) porous layer on one wall (8 12 4) u s u f porous elts (8 12 4) quad coupling elts Corner harmonic excitation Frame Fluid Porous Es = 4.4MPa c 0 = 343m/s φ = 0.94 ν s = 0 γ = 1.4 σ = 40kNs/m 4 ρ s = 130kg/m 3 Pr = 0.71 α = 1.06 ρ 0 = 1.21kg/m 3 Λ = 56µm η = 1.84 10 5 Ns/m 2 Λ = 110µm Mean quadratic pressure in cavity: Acoustic cavity (Davidsson) - Rigid partly covered with porous Poro-acoustic coupled cavity mesh: 1 2 3 Mean quadratic pressure in cavity (db) 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 Rigid cavity 130 Brennan eq. fluid UsUf porous formulation 120 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Frequency (Hz) [P. Davidsson, Structure-acoustic analysis: Finite element modelling and reduction methods, Ph.D Thesis, 2004] Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 12 / 28

Complete concrete car coupled problem Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 13 / 28

Complete concrete car coupled problem Frequency response in the EC and PC of the concrete car Elasto-poro-acoustic problem: Porous layer 2 acoustic cavities: EC and PC A wireframe in between cavities A porous layer on a wall of the PC Corner harmonic excitation in EC 28500 DOFs Wireframe Complete concrete car - With and without porous 200 Mean quadratic pressure (db) 180 160 140 120 100 80 Engine cavity Passenger cavity Passenger cavity - porous layer Acoustic cavities 100 200 300 400 500 600 Frequency (Hz) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 14 / 28

Objectives of the reduction method Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 15 / 28

Objectives of the reduction method Objectives of the applied reduction method Complete model: 28500 DOFs First objective: reduction of the non dissipative part Reduction to interfaces Reduced model: 10600 DOFs (8700 for porous) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 16 / 28

Objectives of the reduction method Objectives of the applied reduction method Complete model: 28500 DOFs First objective: reduction of the non dissipative part Reduction to interfaces Reduced model: 10600 DOFs (8700 for porous) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 16 / 28

Objectives of the reduction method Objectives of the applied reduction method Complete model: 28500 DOFs First objective: reduction of the non dissipative part Reduction to interfaces Reduced model: 10600 DOFs (8700 for porous) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 16 / 28

CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 17 / 28

CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Craig and Bampton reduction method: Outline C & B subdomain partitioning: 02 3 2 31 @ 4 Kii KT 1i K2i T K 1i K 11 0 5 ω 2 4 Mii MT 1i M2i T M 1i M 11 0 5A K 2i 0 K 22 M 2i 0 M 22 2 4 u i 3 u 1 5 = u 2 2 4 f i 3 05 0 C & B transformation: 2 3 2 3 2 3 u i I ii 0 0 u i 4u 1 5 = 4Ψ 1 Φ 1 0 5 4α 1 5 u 2 Ψ 2 0 Φ 2 α 2 with for s=1..2: Ψ s = K 1 ii K is: Static modes Φ s: First normal modes of fixed interface eigenvalue problem K ssφ s = ω 2 sm ssφ s α s: Modal coordinates (<<nb nodal coordinates) Fi 1 Interface: i 2 [R. Craig, M. Bampton, Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis, AIAA, 1968] Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 18 / 28

CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Craig and Bampton reduction method: Outline Resulting system for n substructures: 02 3 2 K iiα 0... 0 M iiα M 0 ω1 2 1i T α... M T 31 2 3 2 3 ni α u i f i 0 0 B6 @ 4.. 0... 7.. 5 M 1iα I 1 0 0 α 1 ω2 6 4.. 0... 7C 6.. 7 5A 4. 5 = 0 6 7 4. 5 0 0... ωn 2 M niα 0... I n α n 0 With: K iiα = K ii + P n s=1 KT si Ψ s M iiα = M ii + P n s=1 ˆMT si Ψ s + Ψ T s M siα = ˆΦ T s `Msi + M ssψ s `Msi + M ssψ s Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 19 / 28

CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method C & B implementation in FEAP Resulting system for subdomain n with its boundary interface: 02 «3 2» Kiin + M T @ 6 Kni T 0 4 Ψn 7 5 M iin + ni Ψn+» «T 31 ω2 6 Ψ T Φ n `Mni + M nnψ n T Mni+ n M nnψ n 7A 4 5 0 ω 2 n ˆΦT n `Mni + M nnψ n I n " pin α n # = " fin 0 # (1) (2) Computation steps: (2) α n = ω 2 `ωn 2 ω2 I n 1 ˆΦT n `Mni + M nnψ n pin " `Kiin + K T Ψn ni ω 2 ˆM iin + M T ni (1) Ψn + # ΨT n `Mni + M nnψ n ω 2 hˆφt n `Mni + M nnψ n T ω 2 `ω 2 n p in = f in ω2 I n 1 ˆΦT n `Mni + M nnψ n i n Interface: i Solving steps: Solve (1) p in Compute p n = hφ nω 2 `ω 2 n ω2 I n 1 ˆΦT n `Mni + M nnψ n + Ψn i p in Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 20 / 28

CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method C & B implementation in FEAP Problem equations: " `Kiin + K TΨn ni ω 2 ˆM iin + Mni T Solve Ψn + # ΨT n `Mni + M nnψ n ω hˆφt 2 n `Mni + M nnψ n T ω 2 `ωn 2 p in = f in ω2 I n 1 ˆΦT n `Mni + M nnψ n i Compute p n = hφ nω 2 `ω i n 2 ω 2 I n 1 ˆΦT n `Mni + M nnψ n + Ψn p in Steps of algorithm: 1. Loop on subdomains n: - Compute K nn & M nn - Eigenvalue problem: ω 2 n, Φ n - Loop on interface dofs K ni Ψ n = Knn 1 K ni M ni A n = M ni + M nnψ n - Compute B n = Φ T n An - Update: K iiα = K iiα + K T ni Ψn M iiα = M iiα +M T ni Ψn +ΨT n An 2. Interface sized problem: - Compute K ii & M ii - Update: K iiα = K iiα + K ii M iiα = M iiα + M ii 3. Loop on ω: - K FRF (ω) = K iiα ω 2 M iiα ω 4 P h i n Bn T `ω2 n ω 2 I n 1 Bn - Solve K FRF (ω) p i = f i p i - p n = hφ nω 2 `ω i n 2 ω2 I n 1 Bn + Ψ n p in Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 21 / 28

CMS: Academic applications Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 22 / 28

CMS: Academic applications C & B reduction applied to enclosed cavity Rigid cavity: (0.4m 0.6m 0.75m) cavity (8 12 15) acoustic elements Decomposed in 2 subdomains Comparison 20/50 normal modes Corner harmonic excitation Cavity mesh: 1 2 3 Mean quadratic pressure (db) Mean quadratic pressure in cavity: 200 180 160 140 Mean quadratic pressure in rigid cavity - 2 subdomains 120 Complete problem CB Reduction - 20 modes CB Reduction - 50 modes 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Frequency (Hz) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 23 / 28

CMS: Academic applications Reduction of acoustic part of porous treated cavity Porous treated cavity: (0.4m 0.6m 0.75m) cavity (8 12 15) acoustic elements (0.4m 0.6m 0.05m) porous layer on one wall (8 12 4) hexahedric elements for porous Acoustic part reduced only Comparison 10/20/50 normal modes Corner harmonic excitation 1 2 3 Mean quadratic pressure (db) Mean quadratic pressure in cavity: 165 160 155 150 145 140 135 Reduced acoustic part of porous treated cavity Complete problem CB Reduction - 10 modes CB Reduction - 20 modes CB Reduction - 50 modes 200 300 400 500 600 700 Frequency (Hz) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 24 / 28

CMS: Academic applications Reduction of acoustic part of porous treated cavity Porous treated cavity: Same cavity covered with porous layer 2 acoustic subdomains for reduction of acoustic part Comparison 50 normal modes Corner harmonic excitation Cavity and porous layer mesh: 1 2 3 Mean quadratic pressure (db) Mean quadratic pressure in cavity: 165 160 155 150 145 140 135 Reduced acoustic part (2 subdomains) of porous treated cavity Complete problem CB Reduction - 50 modes CB Reduction - 2 subdomains - 50 modes 200 300 400 500 600 700 Frequency (Hz) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 25 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Elements implementation (U s p F ) coupling element (u s u f ) porous element (u s u f ) p F coupling element Complete concrete car coupled problem Implementation of reduction method Objectives of the reduction method CMS: Craig and Bampton reduction method Applications CMS: Academic applications CMS: Application to the concrete car Conclusion - Pespectives Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 26 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz Cavity mesh: Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz EC: 50 modes 740 Hz PC: 75 modes 640 Hz Cavity mesh: Mean quadratic pressure (db) Mean quadratic pressure in EC and PC: Mean quadratic pressure in EC / PC+poro - 4 acoustic components 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 Passenger cavity Engine cavity Passenger cavity - reduction Engine cavity - reduction 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Frequency (Hz) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz EC: 50 modes 740 Hz PC: 75 modes 640 Hz Cavity mesh: Relative error (%) Error on mean quadratic pressure: 30 25 20 15 10 5 Relative error of 75 modes reduction Passenger cavity - smoothed Passenger cavity Engine cavity - smoothed Engine cavity 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Frequency (Hz.) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz EC: 50 modes 740 Hz PC: 75 modes 640 Hz Cavity mesh: CPU time (min) CPU computation time: 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 Time with/without reduction on complete CC - 4ss - porous 500 CPU time - no reduction CPU time - 75 modes/ss 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Number frequency increments Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz EC: 150 modes 1200 Hz PC: 250 modes 1000 Hz Cavity mesh: Mean quadratic pressure (db) Mean quadratic pressure in EC and PC: Mean quadratic pressure in EC / PC+poro - 4 acoustic components 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 Passenger cavity Engine cavity Passenger cavity - reduction Engine cavity - reduction 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Frequency (Hz) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz EC: 150 modes 1200 Hz PC: 250 modes 1000 Hz Cavity mesh: Relative error (%) Error on mean quadratic pressure: 25 20 15 10 5 Relative error of 250 modes reduction Passenger cavity - smoothed Passenger cavity Engine cavity - smoothed Engine cavity 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Frequency (Hz.) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz EC: 150 modes 1200 Hz PC: 250 modes 1000 Hz Cavity mesh: Relative error (%) Improvement on error: 30 25 20 15 10 5 Relative error comparison between 50-250 modes Passenger cavity - 1000 Hz truncation Passenger cavity - 650 Hz truncation Engine cavity - 1000 Hz truncation Engine cavity - 650 Hz truncation 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Frequency (Hz.) Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

CMS: Application to the concrete car Reduction method applied to the concrete car Reduced concrete car problem: 4 reduced acoustic components: EC(1) PC(3) Wireframe A 5cm porous layer on one wall FRF range [0,600] Hz EC: 150 modes 1200 Hz PC: 250 modes 1000 Hz Cavity mesh: CPU time (min) CPU computation time: 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 Time with/without reduction on complete CC - 4ss - porous 500 CPU time - no reduction CPU time - 75 modes/ss CPU time - 250 modes/ss 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Number of frequency increments Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 27 / 28

Conclusion and perspectives Basic tools for coupled problems implemented (acoustic, porous and coupling elements) Efficient implementation of a reduction method for non-dissipative part of the problem Reduction method applied to the Smart-Structure Concrete car model Porous media and interfaces responsible of remaining dofs Further reduce interfaces with dofs condensation Work with Matlab on methods for reduction of the porous media Reduction methods for structural acoustic problems 28 / 28