FINAL REPORT Rangeland Rehabilitation through Water Conservation/Concentration

Similar documents
Parent Materials. & some of Seattle s soils

Figure DR3. Constraints on the depth of the hiatus surface based on 10 Be concentration of middle core sample.

SOIL PROFILE STUDY GUIDE

TEXTURE ANALYSIS. Unknown 1 Unknown 2. Unknown 3 6O 6O O Z 14X 10Z X X 8Z

Monitoring and modelling hydrological fluxes in support of nutrient cycling studies in Amazonian rain forest ecosystems Tobon-Marin, C.

Soils of the GLBRC Marginal Land Experiment (MLE) Sites

Erosion and Deposition in a Juniper Woodland: The Chicken or the Egg?

MINERALOGICAL ALTERATIONS OF SOIL IRRIGATED WITH ACIDIC MINE WATER IN THE ALAMOSA RIVER BASIN

On-Site Soils Investigation. Buttermilk Way Storm water Treatment Project Buzzards Bay. MA. February 28 th, 2012

MAFF Ministry of IfiriLE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Master Horizons. O horizon A horizon E horizon B horizon C horizon R horizon W horizon O A E

Lecture 2: Soil Properties and Groundwater Flow

LAB 4 FIELD STUDY OF SOIL: DESCRIBING SOIL HORIZON WITH SOIL PROPERTIES

C) D) 3. Which graph best represents the relationship between soil particle size and the rate at which water infiltrates permeable soil?

Rocks and Weathering

Supplementary Material: Crop & Pasture Science, 2013, 64(12),

DATE: 5/17/2012. LOGGED BY: Geoff Richards. COMPANY: Tetra Tech EM, Inc. DRILL FOREMAN: Walter


Soil Morphology and Stratigraphy on an Erosional Footslope: Dickinson Experiment Station in Western North Dakota

THE CROW CANYON ARCHAEOLOGICAL CENTER

Preliminary soil survey of the NATL Old Field Plots

Weathering and Soil Formation. Chapter 10

u.s. Department of Agriculture

SITE EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE WASTEWATER RECLAMATION TEST SITE Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado

December 13, Kirk Shields Green Mountain Power 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

Appendix I SOIL RATING CHART. (Storie soil Index Rating = factor A* factor B* factor C* factor X) FACTOR A- Rating on character of Physical Profile

LAB 2 IDENTIFYING MATERIALS FOR MAKING SOILS: ROCK AND PARENT MATERIALS

We will explore the Texas Ecoregions and learn the specifics of a few. Understand that each ecoregion has its own characteristics that make it

Soil Profiles (West, Ch. 8)

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)

Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341

DRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01

Weathering is the process that breaks down rock and other substances at Earth s surface

The effect of soil physical parameters on soil erosion. Introduction. The K-factor

Lowest and Youngest Terrace : Soil Pit #4

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

Geology and New England Landscapes

Name: KEY OBJECTIVES HYDROLOGY:

SOILS OF THE HIGH TERRACE REMNANTS IN THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY

Biosphere. All living things, plants, animals, (even you!) are part of the zone of the earth called the biosphere.

6. Circle the correct answer: SINK A drains faster or SINK B drains faster Why?

Monday, October 15 th Grab a textbook! Objective: We will explain the formation of different soils and classify soils according to particle size.

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

LANDFORM ANALYSIS AND SOIL RESOURCE INVENTORY USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUE IN A WATERSHED OF UTTARANCHAL, INDIA

Studying Rocks and Soil

Weathering, Erosion and Deposition

Bachelor of Biosystems Technology Faculty of Technology South Eastern University of Sri Lanka

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Evolution of the conceptual hydrogeologic and ground-water flow model for Las Vegas Valley, Clark County, Nevada

Science and Health EFFECT OF EROSION ON THE CONDITION OF SOIL AND LAND SHAPE

A Strategy for Coupled Vegetation and Soil Sampling to Develop Ecological Site Descriptions

Vegetation and Soil Sampling for STM and ESD Development

EARTH S CHANGING SURFACE


The Effect of Weather, Erosion, and Deposition in Texas Ecoregions

DATA REPOSITORY FIGURES AND TABLES

Standards and Procedures for Site Specific Soil Mapping in Rhode Island. Pg 1

Soil structure Classification

Soils, Hydrogeology, and Aquifer Properties. Philip B. Bedient 2006 Rice University

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Laboratory Exercise #4 Geologic Surface Processes in Dry Lands

Weathering, Erosion & Soils Quiz

2017 NACTA Contest FAQs for 2-Year and 4-Year Universities

Assembling information to develop ecological site and state and transition concepts. Brandon Bestelmeyer, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM

HEBER D. LESSIG U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Box 248, Lisbon, Ohio

Depth to the Apparent Water Table in 17 New York Soils from 1963 to 1970*

SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California

Circle the correct (best) terms inside the brackets:

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Assessment of biological remains from excavations at Newbridge Quarry, Pickering, North Yorkshire (site code: NBQ99)

Three L Canyon Soil Geomorphic Units

Weathering, Erosion, Deposition, and Landscape Development

Name period date assigned date due date returned. Texas Ecoregions

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Online Weather Resources for Manure Application UW Extension Nutrient Management Team Custom Manure Applicator Subcommittee 1

Soils in Minnesota Calcareous Fens

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

SOIL: DEFINITION, FORMATION! & LAYERS"

Log of Monitoring Well D58B

Ecoregions Glossary. 7.8B: Changes To Texas Land Earth and Space

Name: Mid-Year Review #2 SAR

Quebec Ranch 12,500Acres Presidio County, Texas


Each basin is surrounded & defined by a drainage divide (high point from which water flows away) Channel initiation

Superficial Geology Map - Slice A. Order Details: Order Number: Customer Reference: National Grid Reference: Slice: Site Area (Ha): Search Buffer (m):

Feet. SAND; clayey, fine grained; shells are common; rounded quartz grains. SHELLS; muddy; almost no sand, shells and fragments common

Field Identification of Andic Soil Properties for Soils of North-central Idaho

Soil Formation. Lesson Plan: NRES B2-4

Subsurface Erosion in Response to Land Management Changes and Soil Hydropedology. G.V. Wilson, J. R. Rigby, S.M. Dabney

Topic 6: Weathering, Erosion and Erosional-Deposition Systems (workbook p ) Workbook Chapter 4, 5 WEATHERING

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized?

An Introduction to Weather Modification in West Texas

PARQUE COLON AGUADILLA (LAND PROPERTY OF MUNICIPIO AGUADA) LOT PROPERTY OF SUNC. ESTEVEZ BW-1 BW-5 BW-2 DB1 BW-3 DB2 BW-4 DB3 GWS-1

Transcription:

FINAL REPORT Rangeland Rehabilitation through Water Conservation/Concentration Alyson McDonald, Extension Assistant - Hydrology and Charles Hart, Extension Range Specialist Photo Courtesy: Bill Thompson

Project Description: Rangeland ripping/furrowing demonstrations have been implemented on ranches in Pecos, Val Verde, Glasscock, Crockett, Ector, and Presidio Counties. A tractor or bulldozer was used to simultaneously rip and furrow along elevational contours in an effort to concentrate limited precipitation, enhance infiltration, reduce soil loss, and ultimately increase plant production at the sites. Paired watershed plots were installed in Val Verde and Crockett Counties to complement and document the benefits of the demonstrations. Additional plots will be installed in Presidio County. Rainfall intensity, runoff volume and sediment loss from each pair of plots will be measured for two years. A rip/furrow treatment will be applied to one of the plots while the other will serve as a control. Soil physical and chemical properties such as particle size distribution and organic matter content may affect plot response to treatment. Therefore, soil morphology descriptions and physical and chemical analyses are essential to the evaluation of treatment success and for selection of additional treatment sites. Project Accomplishments: Microcatchments were installed in Presidio County. Soil pits were excavated adjacent to the microcatchment sites in Presidio, Crockett and Val Verde Counties. Soil pedons were described and sampled. Soil texture and organic carbon analyses were completed in the laboratory. A portion of the funds provided salary for an undergraduate geology student from Sul Ross State University who developed observation, data collection and laboratory analysis skills. Complete pedon descriptions for each site are included in this report (see Appendix). However, the most central factors in site response and also site selection are slope gradient, soil depth, soil texture and organic matter content. Slopes were similar (1-2%) among sites. Gentle slopes where sheetwash occurs are most desirable because the furrows would fill in quickly in areas where slope gradient is sufficient to cause rill and gully erosion. Soil Depth: Rangeland ripping should be implemented on deep soils where runoff that will be concentrated along the upslope edge of the rips can be stored. The soils are deep (>50 cm) at all three study sites. Soil Texture: Soil texture is one factor that influences infiltration capacity. As clay content increases, macroporosity decreases, thus reducing infiltration. Conversely, sand content is positively related to infiltration capacity. Soil particle size distribution was determined for each site, by horizon, using the Bouyocous hydrometer method (Hons, 1984). Sand (Figure 1) in the surface horizon was greatest (56%) at the Val Verde site, followed by the Crockett County site with 27%. The surface horizon at Presidio contained only 6% sand.

Therefore, we would expect the microcatchments at the Val Verde County site to generate the least runoff. However, there are other physical factors that influence infiltration, such as soil organic matter content. Particle Size Distribution of the Surface Horizon 70 60 50 Percent 40 30 20 10 0 Presidio Crockett Val Verde sand silt clay Figure 1. Particle size distribution of the surface horizon for pedons described in Presidio, Crockett and Val Verde Counties, Texas. Organic Matter Content: The upper two horizons from each soil pit were analyzed for organic matter content using dichromic acid digestion and back-titration with ferrous sulfate (Nelson & Sommers, 1982). Soil organic matter content decreased with depth at all locations (Figure 2). The Val Verde County site soil had the lowest organic matter content, 2.7% and 1.6% in the A1 and A2 horizons, respectively. Organic matter content was greatest at the Crockett County site (7.4% in the A horizon and 3.3% in the AB horizon), followed by the Presidio County site with 3.2% in the A horizon and 2.6% in the AB horizon. Soil organic matter is positively related to water holding capacity, cation exchange capacity and nutrient availability (Brady, 1990). Thus, based on organic matter content, we would expect to see the most positive forage response, and least runoff at the Crockett County site. A comparison of rainfall characteristics and runoff volumes among the sites will be published in a year-end summary.

Organic Matter Content of the Surface Horizon 8 7 6 Organic Matter (%) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Presidio Crockett Val Verde Figure 2. Organic matter content (%) in the surface horizon of pedons described in Presidio, Crockett and Val Verde Counties, Texas. Summary: The tables above illustrate soil particle size and organic matter content. Val Verde County site upper horizon had the highest sand content (56%), but the lowest organic matter content (2.7%), while the sand content in the upper horizon at Crockett County site contained less sand, 27%, and the greatest organic matter content (7.4%). This information has been analyzed separately form the runoff data, but both will be interpreted in conjunction with plant cover and soil surface feature records. The results will be summarized in a year-end report that will be posted on the District VI website. A color pamphlet that defines rangeland recovery and provides guidelines for site selection and implementation of ripping techniques to reestablish vegetation on degraded rangelands will be published next spring. Further Study: In addition to slope, soil depth, soil texture and organic matter, rainfall characteristics are also an important factor to consider when implementing rangeland ripping. In areas with low rainfall, the rips should be spaced farther apart, as it will take more runoff area to support vegetation than in areas where rainfall is greater than about 13 inches. Contacts: Field days at Crockett County (25 participants) and Val Verde County (34 participants) were conducted in the Fall of 2002. Additional field days are scheduled for October

2003. A spring tour of the Presidio County site is planned for the Big Bend Chapter Native Plant Society of Texas. Acknowledgments: Bill Zuberbueler, John Allen Val Verde CEA, Bill Hubbard, James Steen Presidio CEA, Art Roane and Roy Walston Crockett CEA and the Texas Water Resources Institute of the Texas A&M University System Ag Program

Literature Cited Brady, N. C. (1990). The nature and property of soils. New York, New York: MacMillan Publishing Co. 621 pp. Hons, F.M. (1984). Soil chemistry and fertility laboratory manual. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. 57 pp. Nelson, D.W. & Sommers, L.E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: A.L. Page (Ed.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, Pp 539-579. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America. 1159 pp.

Appendix Presidio County Print Date: 03/10/2003 Description Date: 03/05/2003 Describer: Lynn Loomis and Alyson McDonald Site ID: 30104B1-001 Pedon ID: S03TX377-001 Soil Name as Described/Sampled: Marfa Country: United States State: Texas County: Presidio MLRA: 42 -- Southern Desertic Basins, Plains, and Mountains Soil Survey Area: TX377 -- Presidio County, Texas Map Unit: 502 -- MARFA CLAY LOAM, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES Quad Name: San Estaban Lake, Texas Location Description: Bill Hubbard Ranch Datum: NAD83 UTM Zone: 13 UTM Easting: 588029 UTM Northing: 3336635 Existing Vegetation: Nuttall's milkvetch, bladderpod, buckwheat, soaptree yucca, threeawn, blue grama, plains pricklypear, sixweeks grama, tobosa Diagnostic Features: A--0 to 7 centimeters; very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) broken face silty clay loam, dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) broken face, dry; 6 percent sand; 62 percent silt; 32 percent clay; moderate coarse subangular blocky structure parting to moderate medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to weak very fine subangular blocky structure; very friable, soft, moderately sticky, moderately plastic; common fine roots throughout and common very fine roots throughout; many very fine moderate-continuity tubular pores; 1 percent nonflat subangular indurated 5- to 20-millimeter igneous rock fragments; noneffervescent, by HCl, 1 normal; clear smooth boundary; 3.18% organic matter content.

AB--7 to 17 centimeters; very dark brown (10YR 2/2) broken face silty clay, very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) broken face, dry; 10 percent sand; 47 percent silt; 43 percent clay; moderate coarse subangular blocky structure parting to moderate medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to weak very fine subangular blocky structure; very friable, moderately hard, moderately sticky, very plastic; common fine roots throughout and common very fine roots throughout; common fine low-continuity tubular and common very fine lowcontinuity tubular pores; 25 percent continuous distinct very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2), dry, clay films on all faces of peds; noneffervescent, by HCl, 1 normal; clear smooth boundary; 2.56% organic matter content. Bt--17 to 43 centimeters; black (10YR 2/1) broken face clay, very dark gray (10YR 3/1) broken face, dry; 27 percent sand; 26 percent silt; 47 percent clay; moderate medium prismatic structure parting to moderate coarse subangular blocky structure parting to moderate medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to weak very fine subangular blocky structure; friable, very hard, slightly sticky, very plastic; common fine roots throughout and common very fine roots throughout; common fine moderate-continuity tubular and common very fine moderate-continuity tubular pores; 40 percent continuous distinct very dark gray (10YR 3/1), dry, clay films on all faces of peds; noneffervescent, by HCl, 1 normal; clear smooth boundary. Bw--43 to 54 centimeters; very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) broken face loamy sand, dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) broken face, dry; 84 percent sand; 5 percent silt; 11 percent clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to moderate very fine subangular blocky structure; very friable, slightly hard, nonsticky, nonplastic; common fine roots throughout and common very fine roots throughout; common very fine low-continuity tubular pores; 1 percent nonflat subangular indurated 2- to 75-millimeter igneous rock fragments; noneffervescent, by HCl, 1 normal; clear smooth boundary. Cb--54 to 71 centimeters; very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) broken face sandy clay loam, dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) broken face, dry; 62 percent sand; 12 percent silt; 26 percent clay; single grain; loose, loose, nonsticky, nonplastic; few very fine roots throughout; many very fine high-continuity interstitial pores; 7 percent nonflat subrounded indurated 5- to 20-millimeter igneous rock fragments and 12 percent nonflat subrounded indurated 20- to 75-millimeter igneous rock fragments and 16 percent nonflat subrounded indurated 2- to 5-millimeter igneous rock fragments; noneffervescent, by HCl, 1 normal; abrupt wavy boundary. ABb--71 to 83 centimeters; very dark brown (10YR 2/2) broken face silt loam, brown (10YR 5/3) broken face, dry; 12 percent sand; 72 percent silt; 16 percent clay; very friable, moderately hard, slightly sticky, very plastic; few very fine roots throughout; many very fine low-continuity tubular pores; 1 percent nonflat subrounded indurated 5- to 20-millimeter igneous rock fragments; noneffervescent, by HCl, 1 normal.

Crockett County Description Date: 04/04/2003 Describer: Alyson K. McDonald Site ID: Crockett Pedon ID: Crockett Soil Name as Described/Sampled: Classification: Pedon Purpose: Angelo Clayey-skeletal, mesic Torrertic Paleustolls research site Country: State: County: MLRA: Quad Name: Location Description: United States Texas CROCKETT 81B -- Edwards Plateau, Central Part (proposed) Ozona, Texas In the House Pasture of Double T Ranch, NE of Ozona, Crockett County, Texas. Pedon is located between two demonstration microcatchments, which are adjacent to an area where wingripping and seeding was implemented. UTM Zone: 14 UTM Easting: 286237 meters UTM Northing: 3402777 meters Primary Earth Cover: grass/herbaceous cover Secondary Earth Cover: rangeland, savanna Plant Association Name: Existing Vegetation: bladderpod, geranium, globemallow, little barley, pepperweed, rescuegrass, Texas bluebonnet, Texas wintergrass, tobosa, verbena Bedrock Kind: limestone Bedrock Depth: 86 cm. Diagnostic Features: A--0 to 14 centimeters; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) broken face, silt loam, very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) broken face, moist; 27 percent sand; 57 percent silt; 16 percent clay; moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to weak very fine subangular blocky structure; friable, moderately hard; low excavation difficulty; many fine roots throughout and common medium roots throughout; common very fine low-continuity

tubular pores; 8 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments; violent effervescence, by HCl, 1 normal; clear smooth boundary; 7.4% organic matter content. AB--14 to 40 centimeters; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2), clay, very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2), moist; 22 percent sand; 36 percent silt; 42 percent clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure; firm, hard; low excavation difficulty; common fine roots throughout and common medium roots throughout; common very fine low-continuity tubular and common fine moderatecontinuity tubular pores; 15 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments; violent effervescence, by HCl, 1 normal; gradual smooth boundary; 3.25% organic matter content. Bk--40 to 60 centimeters; brown (10YR 5/3) broken face, silty clay, brown (10YR 4/3) broken face, moist; 19 percent sand; 37 percent silt; 44 percent clay; very friable, moderately hard; low excavation difficulty; common fine roots throughout and common medium roots throughout; many very fine low-continuity tubular pores; 10 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments; strong effervescence, by HCl, 1 normal; gradual smooth boundary. Br--60 to 86 centimeters; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4), clay, dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4), moist; 13 percent sand; 33 percent silt; 54 percent clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to weak very fine subangular blocky structure; very friable, hard; moderate excavation difficulty; common medium roots throughout and common fine roots throughout; many very fine low-continuity tubular pores; 12 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments; strong effervescence, by HCl, 1 normal; gradual smooth boundary.

Val Verde County Description Date: 07/08/2003 Describer: Alyson McDonald and Larry Garrett Site ID: Pedon ID: Val Verde Val Verde Soil Name as Described/Sampled: Langtry Classification: Loamy, calcareous, mesic Torrertic Haplustolls Pedon Purpose: research site Country: State: County: MLRA: Quad Name: Location Description: United States Texas VAL VERDE 81D -- Southern Edwards Plateau (proposed) Seminole Canyon, Texas On Zuberbueler Ranch northwest of Comstock, Val Verde County Texas UTM Zone: 13 UTM Easting: 281656 meters UTM Northing: 3286354 meters Primary Earth Cover: grass/herbaceous cover Secondary Earth Cover: rangeland, shrubby Existing Vegetation: croton, honey mesquite, king ranch bluestem, littleleaf sumac, lotebush, sixweeks grama, tasajillo, tiquilia Bedrock Kind: limestone Bedrock Depth: 73 cm. Diagnostic Features: A1--0 to 34 centimeters; brown (10YR 4/3), sandy clay loam, dark brown (10YR 3/3), moist; 56 percent sand; 21 percent silt; 23 percent clay; strong medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to weak fine subangular blocky structure; very friable, slightly hard; low excavation difficulty; many very fine roots throughout; common very fine low-continuity irregular pores; 1 percent flat angular limestone fragments and 1 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments and 2 percent flat subangular limestone fragments and 2 percent flat subangular limestone fragments; violent effervescence, by HCl, 1 normal; clear wavy boundary; 2.7% organic matter content.

A2--34 to 45 centimeters; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4), sandy clay loam, brown (10YR 4/3), moist; 57 percent sand; 16 percent silt; 27 percent clay; strong medium subangular blocky structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to weak fine subangular blocky structure; moderate excavation difficulty; common very fine roots throughout; common medium low-continuity vesicular and common fine low-continuity irregular pores; 1 percent fine threadlike carbonate threads on faces of peds; 8 percent flat subangular limestone fragments and 8 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments and 2 percent flat angular limestone fragments and 10 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments; clear wavy boundary; 1.5% organic matter content. AB--45 to 73 centimeters; brown (7.5YR 5/4) broken face, sandy clay loam, dark brown (7.5YR 3/4) broken face, moist; 3 percent rubbed fiber; 50 percent sand; 19 percent silt; 31 percent clay; moderate fine subangular blocky structure parting to moderate very fine subangular blocky structure; very friable, slightly hard; high excavation difficulty; common very fine roots between peds; many medium low-continuity irregular pores; 3 percent medium spherical on vertical faces of peds; 3 percent nonflat subrounded limestone fragments; violent effervescence, by HCl, 1 normal; clear wavy boundary.