Licenciatura de ADE y Licenciatura conjunta Derecho y ADE. Hoja de ejercicios 2 PARTE A

Similar documents
Stationary Time Series

Nonstationarity-Integrated Models. Time Series Analysis Dr. Sevtap Kestel 1

Cointegration and Implications for Forecasting

Regression with Time Series Data

Time series Decomposition method

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm Winter 2009 SOLUTIONS

TÁMOP /2/A/KMR

R t. C t P t. + u t. C t = αp t + βr t + v t. + β + w t

- The whole joint distribution is independent of the date at which it is measured and depends only on the lag.

Chapter 15. Time Series: Descriptive Analyses, Models, and Forecasting

Lecture 15. Dummy variables, continued

Econ Autocorrelation. Sanjaya DeSilva

(a) Set up the least squares estimation procedure for this problem, which will consist in minimizing the sum of squared residuals. 2 t.

Chapter 16. Regression with Time Series Data

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Spike-count autocorrelations in time.

Arima Fit to Nigerian Unemployment Data

Diebold, Chapter 7. Francis X. Diebold, Elements of Forecasting, 4th Edition (Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning, 2006). Chapter 7. Characterizing Cycles

Modeling and Forecasting Volatility Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models. Economic Forecasting Anthony Tay Slide 1

(10) (a) Derive and plot the spectrum of y. Discuss how the seasonality in the process is evident in spectrum.

OBJECTIVES OF TIME SERIES ANALYSIS

Properties of Autocorrelated Processes Economics 30331

Unit Root Time Series. Univariate random walk

Section 4 NABE ASTEF 232

Department of Economics East Carolina University Greenville, NC Phone: Fax:

Solutions: Wednesday, November 14

Distribution of Least Squares

Vectorautoregressive Model and Cointegration Analysis. Time Series Analysis Dr. Sevtap Kestel 1

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 7: Multicollinearity (Studenmund, Chapter 8)

Solutions to Odd Number Exercises in Chapter 6

Lecture 5. Time series: ECM. Bernardina Algieri Department Economics, Statistics and Finance

Wisconsin Unemployment Rate Forecast Revisited

Introduction D P. r = constant discount rate, g = Gordon Model (1962): constant dividend growth rate.

14 Autoregressive Moving Average Models

CHAPTER 17: DYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS: AUTOREGRESSIVE AND DISTRIBUTED-LAG MODELS

Types of Exponential Smoothing Methods. Simple Exponential Smoothing. Simple Exponential Smoothing

Forecasting optimally

5. NONLINEAR MODELS [1] Nonlinear (NL) Regression Models

Wednesday, November 7 Handout: Heteroskedasticity

Box-Jenkins Modelling of Nigerian Stock Prices Data

Comparing Means: t-tests for One Sample & Two Related Samples

ACE 562 Fall Lecture 8: The Simple Linear Regression Model: R 2, Reporting the Results and Prediction. by Professor Scott H.

STAD57 Time Series Analysis. Lecture 5

ECON 482 / WH Hong Time Series Data Analysis 1. The Nature of Time Series Data. Example of time series data (inflation and unemployment rates)

Økonomisk Kandidateksamen 2005(II) Econometrics 2. Solution

Outline. lse-logo. Outline. Outline. 1 Wald Test. 2 The Likelihood Ratio Test. 3 Lagrange Multiplier Tests

How to Deal with Structural Breaks in Practical Cointegration Analysis

ACE 562 Fall Lecture 4: Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation. by Professor Scott H. Irwin

Chickens vs. Eggs: Replicating Thurman and Fisher (1988) by Arianto A. Patunru Department of Economics, University of Indonesia 2004

Methodology. -ratios are biased and that the appropriate critical values have to be increased by an amount. that depends on the sample size.

EXERCISES FOR SECTION 1.5

Robust critical values for unit root tests for series with conditional heteroscedasticity errors: An application of the simple NoVaS transformation

Estimation Uncertainty

Some Basic Information about M-S-D Systems

Solutions to Exercises in Chapter 12

Dynamic Models, Autocorrelation and Forecasting

Forecast of Adult Literacy in Sudan

2 Univariate Stationary Processes

Quarterly ice cream sales are high each summer, and the series tends to repeat itself each year, so that the seasonal period is 4.

Stability. Coefficients may change over time. Evolution of the economy Policy changes

STAD57 Time Series Analysis. Lecture 17

STAD57 Time Series Analysis. Lecture 17

Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation: a Correction * Tom Coupé

The Simple Linear Regression Model: Reporting the Results and Choosing the Functional Form

I. Return Calculations (20 pts, 4 points each)

Dynamic Econometric Models: Y t = + 0 X t + 1 X t X t k X t-k + e t. A. Autoregressive Model:

Chapter 11. Heteroskedasticity The Nature of Heteroskedasticity. In Chapter 3 we introduced the linear model (11.1.1)

INVESTIGATING THE WEAK FORM EFFICIENCY OF AN EMERGING MARKET USING PARAMETRIC TESTS: EVIDENCE FROM KARACHI STOCK MARKET OF PAKISTAN

ST4064. Time Series Analysis. Lecture notes

Nonstationary Time Series Data and Cointegration

A Specification Test for Linear Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models

Additional material for Chapter 7 Regression diagnostic IV: model specification errors

ACE 562 Fall Lecture 5: The Simple Linear Regression Model: Sampling Properties of the Least Squares Estimators. by Professor Scott H.

Lesson 2, page 1. Outline of lesson 2

1. Diagnostic (Misspeci cation) Tests: Testing the Assumptions

3.1 More on model selection

Hypothesis Testing in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model. 1. Components of Hypothesis Tests

Ready for euro? Empirical study of the actual monetary policy independence in Poland VECM modelling

The Effect of Nonzero Autocorrelation Coefficients on the Distributions of Durbin-Watson Test Estimator: Three Autoregressive Models

A Hybrid Model for Improving. Malaysian Gold Forecast Accuracy

Smoothing. Backward smoother: At any give T, replace the observation yt by a combination of observations at & before T

International Parity Relations between Poland and Germany: A Cointegrated VAR Approach

Distribution of Estimates

Generalized Least Squares

ACE 564 Spring Lecture 7. Extensions of The Multiple Regression Model: Dummy Independent Variables. by Professor Scott H.

5.1 - Logarithms and Their Properties

12: AUTOREGRESSIVE AND MOVING AVERAGE PROCESSES IN DISCRETE TIME. Σ j =

Chapter 5. Heterocedastic Models. Introduction to time series (2008) 1

Lecture 10 Estimating Nonlinear Regression Models

Identification of Trends and Cycles in Economic Time Series. by Bora Isik

Testing for a Single Factor Model in the Multivariate State Space Framework

Applied Time Series Notes White noise: e t mean 0, variance 5 2 uncorrelated Moving Average

The Properties of Procedures Dealing with Uncertainty about Intercept and Deterministic Trend in Unit Root Testing

Kriging Models Predicting Atrazine Concentrations in Surface Water Draining Agricultural Watersheds

References are appeared in the last slide. Last update: (1393/08/19)

Testing the Random Walk Model. i.i.d. ( ) r

School and Workshop on Market Microstructure: Design, Efficiency and Statistical Regularities March 2011

Computer Simulates the Effect of Internal Restriction on Residuals in Linear Regression Model with First-order Autoregressive Procedures

Mean Reversion of Balance of Payments GEvidence from Sequential Trend Break Unit Root Tests. Abstract

GMM - Generalized Method of Moments

Derived Short-Run and Long-Run Softwood Lumber Demand and Supply

Transcription:

Licenciaura de ADE y Licenciaura conjuna Derecho y ADE Hoja de ejercicios PARTE A 1. Consider he following models Δy = 0.8 + ε (1 + 0.8L) Δ 1 y = ε where ε and ε are independen whie noise processes. In wha follows he raes of change are defined as he differences of he logarihms. Mark he correc answers: a) Only he process y is saionary and inverible. b) Boh processes, y and y, have sochasic seasonaliy. c) The process y is saionary, bu is rae of change is no saionary. d) Only he process y is no saionary. e) Boh processes, y and y, are no saionary, bu only he process y has a deerminisic rend. f) None of he above answers is correc.. Consider he following processes: y = ε1 + 0.ε 1 (1 0.L)(1 L)(1 L 1 )log y = (1 0.L) ε where ε and ε are independen whie noise processes. Mark he correc answers: a) Boh processes, y and logy, are saionary bu no inverible. b) The saionary ransformaion of logy does no presen regular auocorrelaion. c) The saionary ransformaion of logy is whie noise. d) The auocorrelaion of order 1 of y is negaive. e) The saionary ransformaion of logy is an AR(1) process. f) The saionary ransformaion of y is a MA(1) process. 3. Le quarerly impors of a counry o be given by he model: 4 ΔΔ log X = (1 0.4L ) ε 4 where ε is a whie noise. In wha follows he raes of change are defined as he differences of he logarihms. Mark he correc answers: a) The quarerly series of raes of change of impors is saionary. b) The annual rae of change of impors is inverible. c) The saionary ransformaion of impors has zero auocorrelaion in all he lags. d) Consider he saionary ransformaion of impors. For he orders greaer han four, he parial auocorrelaions are equal o zero.

e) The saionary ransformaion of impors does no presen auocorrelaion in he regular order, bu i has auocorrelaion in he seasonal order. f) None of he above answers is correc. 4. Consider he following quarerly processes: 4 (1 L )log y = 3 + ε 4 (1 L)(1 L )log y 0.4ε 1 = (1 0.6L) ε where ε 1 and ε 1 are independen whie noise processes. Mark he correc answers: 3 1 has mean equal o. 1 0.4 (b) The annual raes of change, approximaed by he annual differences of logarihmic ransformaions, are saionary in he case of y 1 bu no in he case of y. (c) The saionary ransformaion of y 1 has seasonal correlaion. (d) The auocorrelaion funcion of he saionary ransformaion of y has zero correlaions for lags greaer or equal han he lag. (e) The saionary ransformaions of y 1 and y have zero mean. (a) The series ( L 4 ) log y1

5. a) In he nex able are repored he resuls of a Dickey Fuller uni roo es applied o a daily ime series (including Saurdays and Sundays). The daa are daily prices of French elecriciy from 11/8/001 o 5/5/005. Inerpre he resuls of he uni roo es, indicae null and alernaive hypoheses of he es and explain why we need he regression repored in he able. Null Hypohesis: OFFPEAK1 1_8 has a uni roo Exogenous: Consan Lag Lengh: 1 (Fixed) -Saisic Prob.* Augmened Dickey-Fuller es saisic -11.05146 0.0000 Tes criical values: 1% level -3.43571 5% level -.863601 10% level -.567917 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Augmened Dickey-Fuller Tes Equaion Dependen Variable: D(OFFPEAK1 1_8) Mehod: Leas Squares Dae: 04//08 Time: 1:39 Sample (adjused): 11/9/001 5/5/005 Included observaions: 174 afer adjusmens Variable Coefficien Sd. Error -Saisic Prob. OFFPEAK1 1_8(-1) -0.04368 0.01849-11.05146 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-1)) -0.060316 0.0807 -.15088 0.0316 C 3.887914 0.37637 10.3996 0.0000 R-squared 0.111943 Mean dependen var 0.00130 Adjused R-squared 0.110545 S.D. dependen var 5.087305 S.E. of regression 4.797884 Akaike info crierion 5.976579 Sum squared resid 958.0 Schwarz crierion 5.988706 Log likelihood -3804.081 F-saisic 80.10693 Durbin-Wason sa.0660 Prob(F-saisic) 0.000000 Answer: We made a Dickey Fuller uni roo es. The null hypohesis is ha here exiss a uni roo (model I(1), no saionary) and he alernaive hypohesis is ha he model is saionary (I(0)). We es H0: ρ 1 agains H1: ρ 1 in he model y = a + ρ 1 y 1 + ε 1 = 1 0.

To perform he es we esimae a regression of he firs differences of he series on he firs lag of he iniial series: Δy = a + a 0 1 y 1 + ε H0: a = 1 0 H1: a 1 0 The saisic ha we ge is =-11.05146, -11.05146 > -3.43571, and consequenly we do no accep he null hypohesis. Finally, according o he es, he series has no a uni roo, and i is saionary. b) Below are repored he graphs of he series of he prices and of he esimaed auocorrelaions. Wha are he characerisics of he series of elecriciy prices ha can be derived observing boh graphs? A saionary series have auocorrelaions wih a rapid exponenial decay oward zero. Do you hink ha i is he case for he price of elecriciy?

Answer: The auocorrelaions of he series do no decrease exponenially, and his fac suggess ha he series is no saionary, and i is in conradicion wih he resul of he Dickey Fuller es. c) Explain, giving some reasons, if you expec ha daily elecriciy prices have a seasonal paern. Observing he graph and he auocorrelaions of he series, do you hink ha elecriciy prices have a seasonal paern? Answer: We expec ha elecriciy prices have a seasonal paern in erms of days; for example, we expec ha he firms demand for elecriciy decreases on Saurdays and Sundays, while he families demand for elecriciy increases in hese days, and his fac could affec elecriciy prices. Our expecaion is refleced in he correlogram of he series, which seems o be characerized by a cycle in he auocorrelaions (wih a period of 7 observaions, ha is a week). We can also observe ha some parial auocorrelaions are significan, in paricular he ones associaed wih he seasonal lags (7, 14, 1, 8). d) Observing he correlogram, i has been decided o make an augmened Dickey Fuller es, using informaion crieria o decide he number of lags o include in he regression. Using he resuls of quesion c), do you hink ha make sense o include 8 lags in he regression? Inerpre he resuls of he uni roo es and indicae null and alernaive hypoheses. Wha is he resul of he conras now? Commen he resuls, and make a comparison wih he resuls of quesion b).

Null Hypohesis: OFFPEAK1 1_8 has a uni roo Exogenous: Consan Lag Lengh: 8 (Auomaic based on SIC, MAXLAG=35) -Saisic Prob.* Augmened Dickey-Fuller es saisic -.559131 0.1019 Tes criical values: 1% level -3.435381 5% level -.863649 10% level -.567943 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Augmened Dickey-Fuller Tes Equaion Dependen Variable: D(OFFPEAK1 1_8) Mehod: Leas Squares Dae: 04//08 Time: 1:30 Sample (adjused): 1/6/001 5/5/005 Included observaions: 147 afer adjusmens Variable Coefficien Sd. Error -Saisic Prob. OFFPEAK1 1_8(-1) -0.049507 0.019345 -.559131 0.0106 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-1)) -0.31566 0.0337-9.48660 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-)) -0.804 0.03454-8.186445 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-3)) -0.154653 0.034754-4.44998 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-4)) -0.17735 0.034805-5.09555 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-5)) -0.19193 0.034759-5.59364 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-6)) -0.097795 0.034947 -.798398 0.005 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-7)) 0.09884 0.034497 0.86667 0.3865 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-8)) -0.043108 0.03437-1.59116 0.08 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-9)) -0.117473 0.034061-3.448885 0.0006 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-10)) -0.109858 0.033907-3.40007 0.001 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-11)) -0.10083 0.033533-3.580994 0.0004 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-1)) -0.10549 0.033149-3.09359 0.000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-13)) -0.164678 0.03857-5.011899 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-14)) 0.03597 0.03948 1.090404 0.758 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-15)) -0.070016 0.03936 -.15831 0.0337 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-16)) -0.095056 0.0354 -.947107 0.0033 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-17)) -0.13496 0.03064-3.85157 0.0001 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-18)) -0.146814 0.031670-4.63571 0.0000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-19)) -0.116611 0.031636-3.685984 0.000 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-0)) -0.088184 0.031344 -.813380 0.0050 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-1)) 0.059769 0.031370 1.90574 0.0570 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-)) -0.003417 0.031384-0.108870 0.9133 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-3)) -0.014476 0.03117-0.464383 0.645

D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-4)) -0.053393 0.030534-1.748675 0.0806 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-5)) -0.04491 0.03033-1.480956 0.1389 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-6)) -0.090301 0.09757-3.034596 0.005 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-7)) -0.04147 0.08491-1.454037 0.146 D(OFFPEAK1 1_8(-8)) 0.13140 0.06648 4.930974 0.0000 C 0.959578 0.379189.530609 0.0115 R-squared 0.413897 Mean dependen var 0.014699 Adjused R-squared 0.399931 S.D. dependen var 4.738176 S.E. of regression 3.670387 Akaike info crierion 5.4635 Sum squared resid 16395.11 Schwarz crierion 5.585615 Log likelihood -3375.704 F-saisic 9.6354 Durbin-Wason sa.00595 Prob(F-saisic) 0.000000 Answer: Observing he resuls of pars b) and c), we noice ha he auocorrelaions of he series do no decrease quickly. Moreover, he series has a seasonal paern, and he model mus include more lags. As consequence, he resul of he Dickey Fuller es can be explained by he fac ha we did no include in he regression model all he necessary dynamic of he series. In fac, i has sense o include 8 lags, which corresponds o 4 weeks. Now, he resul of he Augmened Dickey Fuller es (wih 8 lags of he differences) suggess ha he series is no saionary, and also wih a 10% level we accep he null hypohesis of uni roo: he saisic is -.559131, and -.559131 > -.567943. The null and alernaive hypoheses of his es are he same of he Dickey Fuller es performed in par a). 6) Consider he following model y = ε σ σ = ω + αy whereε is Normal and independen wih mean 0 and variance 1. a) Assuming saionariy, ha is α<1, compue he mean and he variance of y. We have ha ε and σ are independen: i follows ha E( y ) = E( ε )E( σ ) = 0. Moreover, he process y is saionary, i follows ha i will have a consan marginal variance, sayσ, which can be compued in he following way: E( y ) = E( ε )E( σ ) = E( σ ) = E( ε ) = 1. 1 σ. I is equal o he variance of he process σ, because b) Discuss if he variable y is uncorrelaed and if i is independen. Wha are he differences beween uncorrelaion and independence? The independence beween he processes ε and σ guaranees ha he series y has no auocorrelaion and i is a whie noise process. In fac, he auocovariances of he series are given by: E( y y ) = E( k σ ε σ k k ) = E( ε ε k )E( σ σ k ) = 0, ε

because he process ε is independen of is pas values and of he pas and acual values of he process σ. I follows ha he process y will have null auocovariances. However, unlike he common hypoheses of ARIMA models, he series y is no independen of is pas values. In fac, y is relaed o y, and even 1 if hey are no correlaed, in general we will observe dependence in he series y. c) Compue condiional expecaion and condiional variance. Wha are he differences beween he marginal (or uncondiional) momens calculaed in par a) and he condiional momens? The condiional mean of y is E( y y 1 ) = E( ε )E( σ y 1) = 0, and i is equal o he marginal mean. The condiional variance is: Var( y y 1 ) = E( ε )E( σ y 1 ) = σ because E( ε y 1 ) = E( ε ) = 1. Therefore, unlike he marginal variance, which is consan, he condiional variance is no consan, and i changes wih ime. I follows ha he process σ has an ineresing inerpreaion: in each momen, i represens he condiional variance of he series, and i changes wih ime wih a sor of saionary dynamic. 7) Consider he following graphs which represen he observed values of a paricular variable and is sample correlaions.3..1.0 -.1 -. 80 8 84 86 88 90 9 94 96 98 00 0 04 Tasas anuales de desempleo

Explain how o inerpre he esimaes of he sample mean, he sample variance and he sample auocovariances of his variable. How do you inerpre ha he sample correlaions are ouside he bands of 95%? The series is abou he annual unemploymen rae, and we know ha he variable unemploymen is ransformed by a logarihmic ransformaion. Therefore, he series unemploymen has no a consan variance, and he sample variance will be no a good esimaor of he variance of he populaion (because of he nonsaionariy of he variance of he series unemploymen ). Now, analyzing he problem for he mean, he correlogram shows firs a high dependence in he observaions of he series and second non-saionariy in mean, because of he slow decrease in he FAC. Therefore, also he sample mean will be no a good esimaor of he mean of he populaion. The same hing happens for he sample auocovariances, because hey are second order momens ha depend of he firs order momen. For his reason, he fac ha he sample correlaions are ouside he bands of 95% can no be inerpreed as usually. Finally, because of he non-saionariy, sample mean, sample variance and sample auocovariances are no represenaive for his process.