Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin Includes Bogue Sound and the Newport River

Similar documents
Section B - Chapter 13 Neuse River Subbasin Bay River and Pamlico Sound

Section B - Chapter 1 Tar-Pamlico River Subbasin Tar River, Fishing Creek, Cedar Creek, Coon Creek and Tabbs Creek

Chapter 2 - Little Tennessee River Subbasin Includes Fontana Lake and the Tuckasegee River Watershed

Chapter 4 French Broad River Subbasin Including the: French Broad River, Little Ivy Creek (River), Ivy Creek, California Creek and Bull Creek

Chapter 2 Roanoke River Subbasin Including: Dan and Mayo Rivers, Pawpaw and Jacobs Creek

Chapter 4 Neuse River Subbasin Including the: Hannah Creek, Black Creek and Mill Creek

YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER BASINWIDE WATER QUALITY PLAN

Watershed Restoration Plan for the Pasquotank River Basin

Planning for the Future of Humboldt Bay: Sea Level Rise, Sediment Management, Sand Spits and Salt Marshes. Joel Gerwein

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

Types of Wetlands. Tidal Systems

Subtidal permanently flooded with tidal water. Irregularly exposed surface exposed by tides less often than daily

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

Relationship between rainfall and beach bacterial concentrations on Santa Monica Bay beaches

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Analysis of Tides and Storm Surge from Observational Records in the Delaware Inland Bays

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

South Carolina Coastal Habitats

Application of an Enhanced, Fine-Scale SWAT Model to Target Land Management Practices for Maximizing Pollutant Reduction and Conservation Benefits

POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS IN DOG RIVER WATERSHED OVER TIME

Carbon Sequestration Potential from Coastal Wetlands Restoration Sites

Appendix E: Cowardin Classification Coding System

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map

Coastal Riparian Buffers Analysis

Chapter 2: Description of Planning Area

Sea Level Rise Providing Nature A-Right-of Way

Overview of Methods. Terrestrial areas that are most important for conservation Conservation

Alexandra Carvalho, Ph.D., GISP Kathy Fitzpatrick, P.E.

Current and Future Technology Applications for Coastal Zone Management. Bruce K. Carlisle, Acting Director Office of Coastal Zone Management

Sea Level Rise in Miami-Dade County Florida Implications for Management of Coastal Wetlands and the Everglades

Columbia Estuary Province

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

Tasks 2 & 3: MARSH CONDITION ASSESSMENT, FEASIBILITY, & SPATIAL DATA REPORT

WELCOME Lake Wabukayne OPEN HOUSE

2 Georgia: Its Heritage and Its Promise

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT TO STUDY CURRENT LONG-TERM EROSION RATES ADJACENT TO TERMINAL GROINS

Sediment Management in the Coastal Bays

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

A Post Processing Tool to Assess Sediment and Nutrient Source Allocations from SWAT Simulations

A More Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment: Flood Damage in Virginia Beach

SEAGRASS COVERAGE TRENDS IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SYSTEM

In order to give all interested parties an opportunity to express their views

GIS-Based Sediment Quality Database for the St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC): Overview Presentations and Demonstration

low turbidity high turbidity

Watershed Conservation Management Planning Using the Integrated Field & Channel Technology of AnnAGNPS & CONCEPTS

Taunton River Salt Marsh Assessment Results from 2014 season

Sri Lanka has a coastline of km excluding the shoreline of bays and inlets.

Fecal Coliform Data Report

One Hilltop, Three Major Watersheds!

Appendix K.2: Sediment Management Excerpt from South Orange County Hydromodification Management Plan

North Wales PRP for Wissahickon Creek Nutrients

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

Streamflow, Sediment, and Nutrient Simulation of the Bitterroot Watershed using SWAT

Use of Remote Sensing and GIS for Wetland, Riparian, and Watershed Assessment, Restoration, and Monitoring

Wailua, Maui WATERSHED FEATURES

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

Section 4: Model Development and Application

South Florida Coastal Storm Surge and Mapping Study

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

MARYLAND S LAND USE/LAND COVER MAP AND ASSOCIATED ANALYSIS

Rainfall Observations in the Loxahatchee River Watershed

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Wailupe, Oÿahu. Wailupe, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Comment Response Document Regarding the Total Maximum Daily Load of Sediment in the Lower Gunpowder Falls Watershed, Baltimore County, Maryland

ENGINEERING APPROACHES TO SHORELINE PLACEMENT FROM COAST TO COAST

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

NC DWQ Stormwater Permitting Interactive Map

Home About Us Articles Press Releases Image Gallery Contact Us Media Kit Free Subscription 10/5/2006 5:56:35 PM

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

From Vulnerability to Resilience And the Tools to Get There. Out of Harm s Way Partnership for the Delaware Estuary August 1, 2012

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

ICAN Great Lakes Workshop

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Sea Level Rise and the Scarborough Marsh Scarborough Land Trust Annual Meeting April 24, 2018

Development and Land Use Change in the Central Potomac River Watershed. Rebecca Posa. GIS for Water Resources, Fall 2014 University of Texas

GIS and Coastal Nutrients Luke Cole

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

MVP WMS, George Schorr

NOAA s OCM: Services, tools and collaboration opportunities & Puerto Rico s NE Marine Corridor as a case study

CHAPTER 6 & 7 VOCABULARY

Primer on Coastal Erosion And Habitat Creation

Examples of How Aerial Imagery Is Used in North Carolina. October 2007

9 th INTECOL Orlando, Florida June 7, 2012

Urbanization factors in the Gilleland Creek watershed, Travis County, Texas. Michael Kanarek GEO386G Final Project Dec. 2, 2011

Hurricane Matthew Threats and Impacts Briefing for Eastern NC

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Major Hurricane Earl

Southwest LRT Habitat Analysis. May 2016 Southwest LRT Project Technical Report

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

Living Shorelines: The origins of a practice, the sudden rise of interest within the stormwater community, and the debate

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Biomes of the World What is a Biome?

Virginia Shoreline Mapping Tools

Modeling Sea-Level Rise in Coastal Wetlands: Understanding Potential Impacts and Their Implications for Management on Cape Cod

Transcription:

Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin 03-05-03 Includes Bogue Sound and the Newport River 3.1 Water Quality Overview Subbasin 03-05-03 at a Glance Land and Water Area (sq. mi.) Total area: 228 Land area: 168 Water area: 60 Population Statistics 1990 Est. Pop.: 11,404 people Pop. Density: 68 persons/mi 2 Land Cover (%) Forest/Wetland: 59 Surface Water: 26 Urban: 4 Cultivated Crop: 6.5 Pasture/ Managed Herbaceous: 4 Water Area: Stream Miles: 18 Estuarine Acres: 34,723 Coastal Miles: 25 Shellfish Harvest Acres: 34,146 This subbasin contains the center of Carteret County, extending from the Croatan National Forest to Beaufort and Beaufort Inlet. A map of this subbasin including water quality sampling locations is presented in Figure B- 5. Biological ratings for these sample locations are presented in Table B-5. Use support ratings for monitored waters are presented in Table B-6. With the exception of Newport, most of the development in this subbasin is along the coast: Morehead City, Beaufort, Atlantic Beach and Bogue Banks. Land use in this subbasin is mostly forested. The highest population densities are in the Beaufort and Morehead City areas along the waterfront. There are indications of nutrient inputs in the upper Newport River. There are also elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels after rainfall events. The tributaries to the Newport River are characteristic swamp streams. Water quality in estuarine waters of this subbasin is generally good. Most of the waters in this subbasin are estuarine with the Newport River as the only major source of freshwater. There are 34,146 acres of estuarine water classified for shellfish harvesting; 11,368 of these acres are ORW. For more information, refer to the White Oak River Basinwide Assessment Report (June 2000) or contact Environmental Sciences Branch at (919) 733-9960 or visit the web site at http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us/. Section B: Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin 03-05-03 86

Figure B-5 Newport River and Tributaries to Bogue Sound Subbasin 03-05-03 CRAVEN CARTERET ONSLOW NC-24 JONES Cedar Point Bogue Cape Carteret Emerald Isle P9600000 NC-24 B-1 Newport B-4 Newport Indian Beach Pine Knoll Shores Bogue Sound (Including Intracoastal Waterway) NC-58 B-2 P7300000 US-70 P9580000 Morehead City River Atlantic Beach B-6 P8965500 NC-101 P8700000 Beaufort N W E S B-7 Legend Subbasin Boundary County Boundary Ambient Monitoring Station Primary Roads Hydrography Benthic Station Municipality ð USGS Gaging Station 5 0 5 Miles Planning Branch Basinwide & Estuary Planning Unit October 22, 2001

Table B-5 DWQ Monitoring Locations and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Bioclassifications (1999) for White Oak River Subbasin 03-05-03 Site Stream County Road Bioclassification Benthic Macroinvertebrates B-1* Bogue Sound Carteret Emerald Isle Not Rated B-2 NW Prong Newport River Carteret SR 1206 Not Rated B-4 SW Prong Newport River Carteret SR 1124 Not Rated B-6 Newport River Carteret Crab Point Not Rated B-7 Morehead Harbor Carteret Radio Island Not Rated Ambient Monitoring** Parameters In Excess of State Standards P7300000 Newport River Carteret Newport DO P6850000 Newport River Carteret Channel Marker G15 P8965500 Morehead Harbor Carteret Morehead P9580000 Bogue Sound Carteret Salter Path P9600000 Bogue Sound Carteret Emerald Isle * Historical data are available; refer to Appendix III. ** Assessment period 9/1/94 to 8/31/99 Table B-6 Use Support Ratings for Monitored Waters in Subbasin 03-05-03 Use Support Category Aquatic Life and Secondary Recreation Fish Consumption Primary Recreation Shellfish Harvesting Use Support Ratings FS PS NS NR Total 0 mi. 31,113.4 ac 0 0 21.6 mi. 0 ac 21.6 mi. 31,113.4 ac 0 0 0 22,895.0 ac 0 mi. 26,683 ac 0 0 22,895.0 ac 2.0 mi. 2,763 ac 15.7 mi. 4,700 ac 0 17.7 mi. 34,146 ac * Refers to miles along Atlantic coastline. 3.2 Status and Recommendations for Previously Impaired Waters This section reviews the status of recommendations made in the 1997 White Oak River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan, reviews current status and use support ratings, and Section B: Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin 03-05-03 88

makes recommendations for the next five years. Previously impaired Class SA waters are discussed in Section 3.4 below. There were no other waters identified as impaired in the 1997 plan. 3.3 Status and Recommendations for Newly Impaired Waters All waters in subbasin 03-05-03 are currently partially supporting (PS) on an evaluated basis for the fish consumption use support category because of a statewide fish consumption advisory for bowfin. Fish tissue samples were not collected in this subbasin. Twenty-five miles of Atlantic coastline are currently partially supporting (PS) the fish consumption use support category because of a consumption advisory for king mackerel. Refer to page 61 for more information on this issue. There are no other newly impaired waters in this subbasin. Class SA waters are discussed below in Section 3.4. 3.4 Impaired Class SA Waters There are 34,146 acres and 17.7 stream miles of Class SA waters in subbasin 03-05-03 that were assessed in the shellfish harvesting use support category. In this subbasin, 7,463 acres (22%) are considered impaired in the shellfish harvesting use support category. Refer to Figure B-6 to identify locations of DEH SS growing areas and growing area classifications. Refer to page 49 for DEH SS growing area criteria. Data for making use support determinations were provided by DEH SS (refer to page 40). The larger water areas in this subbasin are described below with reference to DEH SS growing areas. The problem parameter for all waters listed below is fecal coliform bacteria contamination. Refer to page 49 for recommendations to address impaired Class SA waters. The differences in acreage estimates between years are not necessarily related to changes in water quality, but to different methods of estimating acreage and changes in use support methodology. For more information on changes in use support methodology, refer to page 51. Refer to Appendix III for use support methodology and a complete listing of individual monitored waters. Bogue Sound and Tributaries (Areas D-4, E-1, E-2 and E-3) There are 1,344 acres of Bogue Sound and tributaries including Spooner Creek, Broad Creek and Money Island Bay that are not supporting shellfish harvesting. These areas are DEH SS classified as prohibited/restricted and permanently closed to shellfish harvesting. Bogue Sound adjacent to Jumping Run (367 acres) is also not supporting shellfish harvesting. This area is DEH SS classified as conditionally approved-closed and was closed to shellfish harvesting most of the assessment period. The northern shoreline of Bogue Sound is experiencing rapid growth. Emerald Isle, Cape Carteret and Atlantic Beach are continuing to grow as well. These areas have very large seasonal populations and associated campgrounds and marinas. Bacterial water quality continues to decline along the north shore of Bogue Sound. There are also 146 acres of impaired ORW waters in the western portion of Bogue Sound. The Highway 24 causeway also alters flow into Broad and Gales Creeks. Potential sources of pollution include runoff from urbanized areas and subdivisions (NCDENR, 1999e; NCDENR, 1998e; and NCDENR, 1999c). Section B: Chapter 3 White Oak River Subbasin 03-05-03 89

North Carolina Coastal Federation has acquired buffers at Atlantic Beach (Hoop Hole Creek) to permanently protect shellfish waters from development. Refer to page 105 for more information on this project. North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program has a restoration project on 4.4 acres in the Jumping Run Creek Watershed (refer to page 105) and a 2.8-acre shoreline stabilization and salt marsh restoration at the Maritime Museum near Beaufort. Newport River and Tributaries (Area E-4) There are 1,606 acres of the Newport River and adjacent bays and tributaries extending to the Atlantic Ocean including Harlowe Creek, Core Creek and Crab Point Bay that are not supporting shellfish harvesting. These areas are DEH SS classified as prohibited/restricted and permanently closed to shellfish harvesting. There are 1,380 acres of the Newport River, Harlowe Creek and Core Creek that are also not supporting. These areas are DEH SS classified as conditionally approved-closed and were closed to shellfish harvesting most of the assessment period. The middle portion of the Newport River (2,763 acres) is rated partially supporting. This area is DEH SS classified as conditionally approved-open and was closed to shellfish harvesting 11.7 percent of the five-year assessment period. The population of the area continues to grow around Newport, Morehead City and Beaufort. There are many subdivisions in this subbasin as well. Potential sources of pollution include runoff from urban areas and subdivisions as well as agricultural and forestry land uses (DENR, 1998f). Approved Conditionally Approved-Closed Conditionally Approved-Open Prohibited/Restricted Figure B-6 DEH Shellfish Growing Area Classifications in Subbasin 03-05-03 Section B: Chapter 3 White Oak River Subbasin 03-05-03 90

3.5 303(d) Listed Waters There are 4,046 acres in DEH growing areas D4, E1, E2, E3, E4 and E5 in subbasin 03-05-03 that are on the year 2000 303(d) list. These waters were classified by DEH Shellfish Sanitation as prohibited/restricted. The reported acreages for these areas were based on DEH Shellfish Sanitation growing area acreage estimates. Refer to Appendix IV for more information on the state s 303(d) list and listing requirements. 3.6 Others Issues and Recommendations Nonpoint Source Issues in the Upper Newport River Although the aquatic life/secondary recreation use support category in the upper Newport River are not currently impaired, there are indications of nutrient loading, channelization, habitat removal and habitat degradation. Continued development, road building, wetland ditching and draining, and poor de-snagging practices have the potential to cause degradation of aquatic habitats and water quality in the upper Newport River as well as increase the potential for eutrophication problems in the Newport River estuary. These land uses should implement best management practices to reduce water quality impacts. Bogue Sound Growing Area Reclassifications Because bacteriological water quality no longer meets approved area criteria, DEH SS is reclassifying areas along the north shore of Bogue Sound to conditionally approved-open. These areas are currently rated fully supporting the shellfish harvesting use support category. During the next basinwide assessment, these areas may be rated partially supporting if temporary closures continue to increase in frequency. Stormwater Pumping There have been swimming advisory signs posted at Emerald Isle by DEH SS in response to stormwater pumping. Because this pumping can close shellfish harvesting areas and swimming areas, it is recommended that stormwater pumping be done only during emergencies. Emerald Isle has been issued violations for pumping stormwater during non-emergency situations. Emerald Isle is pursuing funding to purchase land to be used for stormwater treatment. DEH SS and DWQ will continue to monitor this situation and pursue a resolution that does not involve potential contamination of surface waters with stormwater. Calico Creek Calico Creek is currently not rated; however, studies in 1999 indicate water quality impacts from urban nonpoint sources as well as the Morehead City WWTP (1.7 MGD). Calico Creek is poorly flushed and any additional inputs of nutrients or BOD may increase the potential for adverse water quality impacts. Several tidal periods are needed to flush the creek. Section B: Chapter 3 White Oak River Subbasin 03-05-03 91