Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

Similar documents
Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Appendix K.2: Sediment Management Excerpt from South Orange County Hydromodification Management Plan

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

DAM REMOVAL ENGINEERING ISSUES & OPTIONS

A PRIMER ON DAM REMOVALS IN MICHIGAN. Joe Rathbun Michigan Dept. Environmental Quality

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF FLUVIAL SEDIMENT DELIVERY, NEKA RIVER, IRAN. S.E. Kermani H. Golmaee M.Z. Ahmadi

Perspectives on river restoration science, geomorphic processes, and channel stability

Restoring the Napa River:

Appendix O. Sediment Transport Modelling Technical Memorandum

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

Watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply: Advancing the Science of Watershed Analysis

Assessment. Assessment

Evaluation of Geomorphic Effects of Removal of Marmot and Little Sandy Dams and Potential Impacts on Anadromous Salmonids

Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

Technical Memorandum No

Technical Review of Pak Beng Hydropower Project (1) Hydrology & Hydraulics and (2) Sediment Transport & River Morphology

Stream Classification

Griswold Creek August 22, 2013

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Sediment Transport Analysis for Stream Restoration Design: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

Sediment Management for Dam Removals

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

APPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS. Quantico Creek Watershed Assessment April 2011

Sedimentation in the Nile River

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Physical modeling to guide river restoration projects: An Overview

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

PolyMet NorthMet Project

River floodplain regime and stratigraphy. Drs. Nanette C. Kingma.

HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE

Erosion Rate is a Function of Erodibility and Excess Shear Stress = k ( o - c ) From Relation between Shear Stress and Erosion We Calculate c and

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Fluvial Geomorphology

APPENDIX B Hydraulic Considerations for Pipeline Crossings of Stream Channels

Hydraulics of bendway weirs

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Lower Susquehanna River Integrated Sediment & Nutrient Monitoring Program

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

GEOMORPHIC CHANGES IN LOWER CACHE CREEK 2012

CHANNEL GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO DISTURBANCES ASSESSED USING STREAMGAGE INFORMATION

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEHRADUN

Dolores River Watershed Study

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Business. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Field Trip Number One. By: Pat Dryer. Geography 360

Modeling Post-Development Runoff and Channel Impacts from Hydromodification: Practical Tools for Hydromodification Assessment

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

The SedAlp Project: WP6: INTERACTION WITH STRUCTURES

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Dam Removal Express Assessment Models (DREAM). Part 2: Sample runs/sensitivity tests

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Landscape Development

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

Mississippi River and Tributaries Project Mississippi River Geomorphology and Potamology Program

Upper Drac River restoration project

Start of Presentation: No notes (Introductory Slide 1) 1) Salmonid Habitat Intrinsic Potential (IP) models are a type of habitat potential

Transcription:

A review of: Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment Joe Rathbun (Retired) rathbunj@sbcglobal.net

Some Potential Sediment Issues Reservoir restoration Downstream water quality Downstream deposition Burial of water intakes Chemical contaminants Downstream coastal deltas & beaches Downstream reservoirs

Variables Affecting Sediment Impacts Reservoir sediment volume, grain size, contamination, & spatial distribution Extent & rate of sediment erosion Tolerance & adaptability of sensitive species Infrastructure vulnerability

Creating the Guidelines Department of Interior s Subcommittee on Sedimentation convened dam removal national experts from government, academia, & NGOs Held 2 workshops (OR, PA) to collect information, discuss issues & make writing assignments

Still a draft HRWC will send you the link to the final document

Guideline Objectives Assist with determining the level of sediment data collection analysis modeling necessary to plan & implement dam removal projects using a risk-based approach

10 Guideline Steps 1. Identify sediment concerns 2. Collect reservoir & river data 3. Evaluate sediment contamination 4. Determine relative reservoir sediment volume & probability of impact 5. Refine potential sediment consequences, & estimate risk

10 Guideline Steps, continued 6. Develop dam removal & sediment management plans 7. Conduct sediment risk analysis 8. Assess uncertainty of data & predictions 9. Determine if sediment impacts are acceptable 10. Develop monitoring & adaptive management plans

Other guidelines also useful (Wildman & MacBroom, 2011)

Emphasis of this talk: Step 4. Determine relative reservoir sediment volume & probability of impact Step 7. Conduct sediment risk analysis

1a. Identify sediment concerns Rather conceptual & qualitative Degree & rate of erosion Excessive incision upstream Exposure of submerged infrastructure Downstream aggradation Elevated turbidity

1b. Identify sediment benefits Not all sediment is bad! New riverine habitat Increase particle size diversity Increase instream habitat diversity Reconnect floodplains Replenish coastal deltas & beaches Restore nutrient & wood transport

2. Collect reservoir & river data Dam construction & operation Reservoir sediment deposit dimensions; longitudinal & lateral Probing survey & geomorph surveys Sediment particle size distribution Reservoir wood & other debris Old infrastructure in reservoir

2. Collect reservoir & river data Downstream reaches of concern Depositional reaches Floodplain dimensions Tributary junctions Bridges, water intakes, outfalls Stream hydrology Stream sediment characteristics

3. Evaluate sediment contamination Due diligence to assess whether contaminants are likely to be a concern If so, collect samples & analyze for appropriate contaminants Compare to appropriate standards Survey design = target silt deposits & use stratified random sampling

3. Evaluate sediment contamination Number of samples: Follow regulatory guidance, or Geostatistical calculations Elipgrid recommended

Elipgrid Example Canals off Lake St. Clair 21,700 m 2 (~ 6 football fields) Assume square grid, 95% confidence of detecting a circular hot spot Hot spot radius (m) Required # of samples 20 20 15 35 10 78 5 312 1 7,787

Michigan s guidance First, sieve analysis If < 90% sand... 6 cores from 1 st 10,000 cubic yards 1 additional core from each additional 10,000 cubic yards Total PCBs Suite of PAHs Suite of metals Total organic carbon Pesticides, if suspected

4. Determine relative sediment volume Estimate reservoir sediment volume (Vs) Probing survey, coring, long pro, etc. Estimate average annual sediment load (Qs) sediment-discharge rating curves, sediment yield calculations, sediment trap efficiency calculations

Sediment Yield Plot for Michigan Creech et al, 2010

Magnitude of relative sediment volume Reservoir sediment volume (Vs) vs. Average annual sediment load (Qs) Vs/Qs Negligible Small Medium Large 0.01 0.1 1 10 100+ (Separate fine and coarse sediment?)

Negligible sediment volume Vs < 0.1 Qs Alternative criteria Wres / Wch 1.5 Dam height bankfull height No sediment found by visual observation or probing Longitudinal profile = no sediment wedge Vs < volume of a sand or gravel bar Bar volume = Wbf 2 x Dbf

Magnitude of relative sediment volume How much is too much? Depends on sensitivity of downstream resources Negligible = never a problem Large = always a problem Confer with DEQ, DNR, other stakeholders

5. Refine estimate of potential sediment consequences, & estimate risk Consequences depend on: Particle size Fines = water quality & siltation; Coarse = channel morphology Spatial extent of deposition Deposition greatest near dam? Duration of turbidity or deposition Hours to decades

5. Refine potential sediment consequences, & estimate risk Risk = Probability of impact x Consequences of impact Consequence Probability Small Medium Large Small Low risk Low risk Moderate risk Medium Low risk Moderate risk High risk Large Moderate risk High risk High risk

6. Develop dam removal & sediment management plans Rapid or staged removal Partial or complete removal Certain season or flows Downstream channel degradation? Non-erodible materials in reservoir? Contaminant issues? Sensitive biota?

6. Develop dam removal & sediment management plans Options for sediment management Allow natural erosion Mechanical removal Sediment & channel stabilization Sediment isolation and/or capping Combination

7. Conduct sediment risk analysis 2 basic questions: Fate & effects of reservoir sediment? Appearance of new reservoir landscape? Usually similar to upstream channel, minus mature trees

Some reservoir sediment transport rules of thumb: New channel will form by headcut(s) & incision, and channel widening/floodplain formation 1. Rapid erosion (incision) due to increased energy gradient 2. Slower erosion (widening) due to hydrologic events (storms, etc.)

More reservoir sediment transport rules of thumb: Incision continues until pre-dam surface is reached Presence of pre-dam thalweg = new channel will probably occupy the old stream bed Incision will not extend past upstream end of reservoir delta unless the downstream channel has degraded

Conceptual model of sediment erosion & channel formation (Doyle et al, 2003)

More reservoir sediment transport rules of thumb: Colonizing vegetation can stabilize sediment, but only if root depth sediment thickness Tributaries to reservoir are wild cards Headcuts = unexpected upstream incision Sediment deltas = affect channel alignment

More reservoir sediment transport rules of thumb: Fine sediments will transport until they reach a deposition zone Coarse sediments will travel downstream in long, low-amplitude waves (with maximum deposition just d/s of the dam?)

Tools for sediment analysis, by risk category

Step 7: Numerical Sediment Transport Models Good at: Vertical channel incision 1-D transport & deposition with time & distance d/s Bad at: Lateral channel erosion & deposition Meander formation Headcut formation & migration

Step 7: Numerical Sediment Transport Models Model Type Distance Time Lateral sediment erosion 1-D 10s of miles Years to decades 2-D < 10 miles Days to months No Yes 3-D < 1 mile < 1 week Yes 1D = HEC-6 2D = SRH-W 3D = U2RANS

Also contains modeling information (Papanicolaou & Barkdoll, eds., 2011)

8. Assess uncertainty of data & predictions Uncertainty always present, but hard to quantify Assess by monitoring during removal (Step 10), and return to Guidelines if necessary Iterative

Some Uncertainty ( U ) Rules of Thumb Annual sediment load (Qs): U depends on measurement method used Reservoir sediment volume (Vs): U depends on method used & sediment thickness

Some Uncertainty ( U ) Rules of Thumb Particle sizes & contaminants: U depends on number & distribution of samples Sed transport & deposition: U depends on input data quality, plus model choice & skill of modeler

9. Determine if sediment impacts are acceptable A qualitative judgment, informed by stakeholders & regulators If acceptable, proceed to Step 10 If not acceptable revise removal & sediment management plans (Step 6) and add sediment mitigation steps Phased removal Removal timing Remove or stabilize sediment prior to removing dam Leave a portion of dam in place

10. Develop monitoring & adaptive management plans Monitoring performed to: Confirm permit compliance (necessary) Identify adaptive management actions (necessary if problems arise) Assess environmental effectiveness - success story (not always needed) See Collins et al, 2007 for recommendations

Collins et al, 2007

Thanks! Any questions?