EESC Geodesy with the Global Positioning System. Class 7: Relative Positioning using Carrier-Beat Phase

Similar documents
EESC Geodesy with the Global Positioning System. Class 4: The pseudorange and phase observables

EESC Geodesy with the Global Positioning System. Class 6: Point Positioning using Pseuduorange

GPS cycle slips detection and repair through various signal combinations

Satellite baseline determination with phase cycle slip fixing over long data gaps

Atmospheric delay. X, Y, Z : satellite cartesian coordinates. Z : receiver cartesian coordinates. In the vacuum the signal speed c is constant

ESTIMATING THE RESIDUAL TROPOSPHERIC DELAY FOR AIRBORNE DIFFERENTIAL GPS POSITIONING (A SUMMARY)

Climate Monitoring with Radio Occultation Data

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14

Satellite Navigation error sources and position estimation

Modern Navigation. Thomas Herring

Satellite Navigation PVT estimation and integrity

Real-Time Estimation of GPS Satellite Clocks Based on Global NTRIP-Streams. André Hauschild

GPS Multipath Detection Based on Sequence of Successive-Time Double-Differences

GPS Geodesy - LAB 7. Neglecting the propagation, multipath, and receiver errors, eq.(1) becomes:

Carrier Phase Techniques

GNSS: Global Navigation Satellite Systems

Use of ground-based GNSS measurements in data assimilation. Reima Eresmaa Finnish Meteorological Institute

Carrier-phase Ambiguity Success Rates for Integrated GPS-Galileo Satellite Navigation

Cycle Slip Detection and Correction Methods with Time-Differenced Model for Single Frequency GNSS Applications*

Impact of Tropospheric Delay Gradients on Total Tropospheric Delay and Precise Point Positioning

Undifferenced GPS for Deformation Monitoring

FEASIBILITY OF DIRECTLY MEASURING SINGLE LINE-OF-SIGHT GPS SIGNAL DELAYS

Carrier Phase Integer Ambiguity Resolution Recent results and open issues

Benefits of State Space Modeling in GNSS Multi-Station Adjustment

Earthquake distribution is not random: very narrow deforming zones (= plate boundaries) versus large areas with no earthquakes (= rigid plate

Satellite Geodesy and Navigation Present and Future

Kinematic Orbit Determination of Low Earth Orbiting Satellites using GPS Observables

2. GNSS Measurements

Noise Characteristics in High Precision GPS Positioning

GPS 10, GPS , GPS. (J PL ) Zumbeger. mm, cm ; ( Global RT K) [3 ]

Modern Navigation

VELOX-CI: Advanced Application of GPS for Radio Occultation and Satellite Attitude Determination

THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL CORRELATIONS ON THE AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION AND ACCURACY ESTIMATION IN GPS DIFFERENTIAL POSITIONING

OPTIMAL TIME TRANSFER

The Usefulness of WADGPS Satellite Orbit and Clock Corrections for Dual-Frequency Precise Point Positioning

Autocorrelation Functions in GPS Data Processing: Modeling Aspects

Developments towards GNSS real-time service in GFZ

Hourly Updated Precise Orbit Products of Quad-constellation

Evaluation of Two Integer Ambiguity Resolution Methods for Real Time GPS Positioning

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18" Mathematical models in GPS" Mathematical models used in GPS"

Influences of different factors on temporal correlations of GNSS observations

A. Barbu, J. Laurent-Varin, F. Perosanz, F. Mercier and J. Marty. AVENUE project. June, 20

Test Computations

The Ohio State University IGS LEO/GPS Pilot Project: Status and Future Plans

DGPS Kinematic Carrier Phase Signal Simulation Analysis for Precise Aircraft Velocity Determination

3.3 Analysis Coordinator

IGS POLAR MOTION MEASUREMENTS

Orbit Representation

Multi-GNSS Opportunities and Challenges

Ionosphere influence on success rate of GPS ambiguity resolution in a satellite formation flying

Zenith delay [mm] Time [min]

PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION OF GPS SATELLITES FOR REAL TIME APPLICATIONS

On the Spectrum of the GPS DD-Ambiguities

Orbit Determination Using TDMA Radio Navigation Data with Implicit Measurement Times. Ryan C. Dougherty and Mark L. Psiaki

TOWARDS ROBUST LOCALIZATION OF RTK-GPS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS 23

Statistical characteristics of L1 carrier phase observations from four low-cost GPS receivers

INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR LEO

Simulation Study of A Low-Low Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking Mission. Jeongrae Kim, B.S., M.S. Dissertation. Doctor of Philosophy

UCGE Reports Number 20271

High Rate GPS Solutions

Lecture 2 Measurement Systems. GEOS 655 Tectonic Geodesy

This is an author-deposited version published in: Eprints ID: 16117

On the realistic stochastic model of GPS observables: Implementation and Performance

Multi-Sensor Fusion for Localization of a Mobile Robot in Outdoor Environments

USING THE INTEGER DECORRELATION PROCEDURE TO INCREASE OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE MAFA METHOD

Satellite Navigation GPS measurements and error sources

EFFECIENCY OF GPS TECHNIQUES IN NATIONAL APPLICATIONS

Research of Satellite and Ground Time Synchronization Based on a New Navigation System

Clock Modeling & Algorithms for Timescale Formation

The ACES Mission. Fundamental Physics Tests with Cold Atom Clocks in Space. L. Cacciapuoti European Space Agency

Rapid Determination of Earthquake Magnitude using GPS for Tsunami Warning Systems: An Opportunity for IGS to Make a Difference

GPS-BASED NAVIGATION AND ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR THE AMSAT AO-40 SATELLITE

Week 02. Assist. Prof. Dr. Himmet KARAMAN

GNSS-specific local effects at the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell

Ionosphere Prediction Service for GNSS Users

NGA GNSS Division Precise Ephemeris Parameters

Muhammad Zaheer. Master of Science Thesis in Geodesy No TRITA-GIT EX

EESC 9945 Geodesy with the Global Posi6oning System. Class 2: Satellite orbits

What s Not Wrong With Faster-Than-Light Neutrinos

GPS DESIGN: UNDIFFERENCED CARRIER BEAT PHASE OBSERVATIONS AND THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCING THEOREM

Approximation of ambiguity covariance matrix for integer de-correlation procedure in single-epoch GNSS positioning

IGS-MGEX: QZSS Orbit and Clock Determination

Real-time Clock Estimation for Precise Orbit Determination of LEO-Satellites

Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Groundbased. Lecture 12

GPS-Based Attitude Determination for a Spinning Rocket

Autonomous satellite orbit prediction

SPACECRAFT NAVIGATION AND MISSION SIMULATION

Introduction to Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Module: 2

EPOS-RT: Software for Real-time GNSS Data Processing

Characteristics of GPS ZTD products. Jan Douša EUREF Analysis Centre Workshop

Possible advantages of equipping GNSS satellites with on-board accelerometers

Ephemeris Monitor for GBAS Using Multiple Baseline Antennas with Experimental Validation

Information in Radio Waves

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11

Precise Orbit Determination and Radio Occultation Retrieval Processing at the UCAR CDAAC: Overview and Results

Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology. Institute for Communications and Navigation Prof. Dr. sc. nat.

to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San

Residual Versus Suppressed-Carrier Coherent Communications

Impact of the SRP model on CODE's 5- system orbit and clock solution for the MGEX

Kinematic Monitoring for Baselines Ranging from 3m to 30km

Transcription:

EESC 9945 Geodesy with the Global Positioning System Class 7: Relative Positioning using Carrier-Beat Phase

GPS Carrier Phase The model for the carrier-beat phase observable for receiver p and satellite r we developed, ignoring atmospheric and ionospheric propagation delays, was φ r p(t) = 1 λ ρr p(t) + φ r φ p + N r p + f [δ r (t) δ p (t)] We ve left off the since too many Subscript letters are different 2

Single Difference The single difference (or single difference phase ) is the difference between phase observations from two sites for a single satellite: φ r pq(t) = φ r p(t) φ r q(t) = 1 [ ρ r λ p (t) ρ r q(t) ] φ p + φ q + Np r Nq r +f [δ q (t) δ p (t)] Satellite initial phase and clock error have differenced out 3

Baseline Vector Let b pq be the vector between two GPS site located at x p and x q : bpq = x q x p b pq is called the baseline vector (or inter site vector ) between sites p and q 4

Single-difference geometry: Short baseline limit The geometry term in the single-difference phase is ρ r pq = ρ r p ρ r q = x r x p x r x q Substituting x q = x p + b pq we have ρ r pq = ρ r p x r x p b pq = ρ r p ρ r p b pq The length of the vector ρ r p b pq is [ ρ r p b pq = ρ r p 1 2ˆρr p b pq ρ r p + ( bpq ρ r p ) 2 ] 1/2 5

Single-difference geometry: Short b limit Expanding for small b pq gives [ ρ r p b pq ρ r p 1 ˆρr p b pq ρ r + o p ( (bpq ρ r p ) 2 )] Dropping terms of order (b pq /ρ r p) 2 and smaller gives ρ r p b pq ρ r p ˆρ r p b pq The geometry term in the single-difference phase for b pq ρ r p is thus ρ r pq = ρ r p ρ r p b pq ˆρ r p b pq 6

Single-difference geometry: Short b limit Range Difference (km) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Exact Short BL Approx. 0 0 1000 2000 3000 Baseline Length (km) 4000 Difference is 10 cm @ 100 km 7

Implications of differencing Single-difference phase observations are much less sensitive to position and much more sensitive to difference of position In other words, sensitivity to coordinate origin has been significantly decreased 8

Implications of differencing Sensitivity of phase to baseline error (as rule of thumb) is δφ δb + bδˆρ δb + b δx sat x sat Thus, an error in the orbital position of a GPS satellite can compensated (i.e., Φ 0) if δb b δx sat x sat This is why orbit errors are often spoken of in terms of fractional errors (e.g., parts-per-billion) 9

Errors in IGS Orbit Products IGS Product Latency Nominal Nominal Name Accuracy (cm) Accuracy (ppb) Broadcast 0 100 40 Ultra-Rapid 0 9 h 3 5 0.1 0.2 Rapid 17 41 h 2.5 0.09 Final 12 18 d 2.5 0.09 1 ppb orbit error 1 mm baseline error @ 1000 km 10

Error History for IGS Orbit Products 11

Double Difference Single difference for sites p and q to satellite r: φ r pq (t) = φr p (t) φr q (t) = 1 [ ρ r λ p (t) ρ r q (t)] φ p + φ q + N p r N q r +f [δ q (t) δ p (t)] Double difference formed from two single differences to two satellites: φ rs pq (t) = φr pq (t) φs pq (t) = 1 λ [ ρ r p (t) ρ r q (t) ρs p (t) + ρs q (t)] + N r p N r q N s p + N s q = 1 λ ρrs rs pq (t) + Npq All site-only- and satellite-only-dependent terms have canceled 12

Working with Double Differences Some advantages: 1. No clocks, initial phases 2. Simple model Some disadvantages: 1. Bookkeeping 2. Estimating ambiguities 3. Further loss of sensitivity 4. Unable to reconstruct one-way phases 13

Triple Difference Double difference formed from two single differences to two satellites: φ rs pq (t) = φr pq (t) φs pq (t) = 1 λ [ ρ r p (t) ρ r q (t) ρs p (t) + ρs q (t)] + N r p N r q N s p + N s q = 1 λ ρrs rs pq (t) + Npq Triple difference formed from time differences of double difference φ rs pq (t j, t k ) = φ rs pq (t k) φ rs pq (t j) 1 [ ρ r λ p (t) ρ r q (t) ρs p (t) + ρs q (t)] (t k t j ) Useful for cycle-slip detection 14

GPS Data Analysis: Outline 1. Perform clock solution (a) Estimate receiver clock errors (b) Estimate site position if no prior better (< 1 m) is available 15

Clock solution showing clock steering Clock Error (km) 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 300 250 Clock Error (km) 200 150 100 50 0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 Epoch (fraction of day) 0.08 0.10 300 km 1 msec 16

Pseudorange Residuals LC Pseudorange Residual (m) 40 30 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Epoch (fraction of day) 1.0 RMS = 5.4 m 17

GPS Data Analysis: Outline 1. Perform clock solution (a) Estimate receiver clock errors (b) Estimate site position if no prior better (< 1 m) is available 2. Using best model, repair cycle slips 18

Data Processing: Cycle Slips We have assumed that the integer bias N in the phase model is not a function of time In fact, cycles slips can occur in systems such as GPS receivers that employ phase-locked loops A phase-locked loop is a feedback system that uses the phase difference of the received and internal signals to modify the internal frequency in an attempt to match frequency variations of the incoming signal and to keep the signal locked Such systems are highly sensitive to SNR to be able to separate the signal (which should be locked onto) from the noise (which should be ignored) Also, if the phase varies rapidly in a noise-like manner (e.g., ionosphere, multipath), the receiver can lose lock 19

L1 DD Residuals (b = 10 km) Units: cycles/hours 20

L1 DD Residuals (b = 10 km) with cycle slip Units: cycles/hours 21

Rectifying cycle slips These days, cycle slip detection and removal is done using automatic processing In old days, done by hand One useful data combination is the Melbourne- Wübbena wide lane: mw = φ 1 φ 2 1 c (f 1 f 2 ) (f 1 + f 2 ) [f 1R 1 + f 2 R 2 ] (1) 22

Melbourne-Wübbena Wide-Lane -23500000-24000000 MW_WL_07_cycles -24500000-25000000 MW_WL_07_cycles Cycle slip -25500000 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 Time_Hrs 22.0 23.0 24.0 From Herring, Principles of the Global Positioning System 23

Next time Regional solutions using fixed orbits Orbit integration Orbit parameter estimation The IGS network 24