The Beleaguered Figure 15 TFMA 2015 Fall Technical Summit After the Floods: Texas Rising

Similar documents
The Beleaguered Figure 15

Extreme Precipitation, NOAA Atlas 14, Other InFRM Initiatives What Can You Do?

TXHYETO.XLS: A Tool To Facilitate Use of Texas- Specific Hyetographs for Design Storm Modeling. Caroline M. Neale Texas Tech University

New NOAA Precipitation-Frequency Atlas for Wisconsin

Areal Reduction Factors for the Colorado Front Range and Analysis of the September 2013 Colorado Storm

Design Storms for Hydrologic Analysis

Areal Reduction Factors for the Colorado Front Range and Analysis of the September 2013 Colorado Storm

RAINFALL FREQUENCY ANALYSIS FOR NEW BRAUNFELS, TX (or Seems like we ve been having lots of 100-yr storms)

Las Colonias Subdivision September 2010 Flood Study

Depth-Duration Frequency (DDF) and Depth-Area- Reduction Factors (DARF)

San Antonio River Authority. San Antonio River Authority Floodworks implementation in the San Antonio River Basin. Nefi Garza, PE, CFM

Model Calibration and Forecast Error for NFIE-Hydro

Leon Creek Watershed October 17-18, 1998 Rainfall Analysis Examination of USGS Gauge Helotes Creek at Helotes, Texas

Detailed Storm Rainfall Analysis for Hurricane Ivan Flooding in Georgia Using the Storm Precipitation Analysis System (SPAS) and NEXRAD Weather Radar

Hydrologic Evaluation of the Blanchard River

NRC Workshop - Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment Jan 2013

Real-Time Flood Forecasting Modeling in Nashville, TN utilizing HEC-RTS

LITERATURE REVIEW. History. In 1888, the U.S. Signal Service installed the first automatic rain gage used to

NRC Workshop Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment (PFHA) Jan 29-31, Mel Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. MGS Engineering Consultants, Inc.

Area-Depth Studies for Thunderstorm Rainfall in Illinois

Another 100-Year Storm. October 26, 2016 Mark Dennis, PE, CFM

David R. Vallee Hydrologist-in-Charge NOAA/NWS Northeast River Forecast Center

Monte Carlo Simulations for Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment

HEC-HMS Lab 4 Using Frequency Storms in HEC-HMS

TRWD Upper Trinity River Flood Operations Decision Support System

Basins-Level Heavy Rainfall and Flood Analyses

Pompton Lakes Dam Downstream Effects of the Floodgate Facility. Joseph Ruggeri Brian Cahill Michael Mak Andy Bonner

Flood Event Analysis to Estimate the Avoided Damages Due to Flood Improvement Projects & Voluntary Buyout Program

NWS Mission 5/25/2017. Innovations in Flood Forecasting at the National Weather Service West Gulf River Forecast Center

Empirical, Dimensionless, CumulativeRainfall Hyetographs Developed From Storm Data for Selected Small Watersheds in Texas

6/9/2014. Software Overview. System Overview

Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves Example

Stochastic Modeling of Extreme Floods on the American River at Folsom Dam

Real-Time Meteorological Gridded Data: What s New With HEC-RAS

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Study 16.5 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)

Memorandum. Background

Kije Sipi. Kije Sipi Ltd. Weather Radar Derived Rainfall Areal Reduction Factors

HEC & GIS Modeling of the Brushy Creek HEC & GIS Watershed Modeling of the

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Results of Intensity-Duration- Frequency Analysis for Precipitation and Runoff under Changing Climate

Generation of synthetic design storms for the Upper Thames River basin

USGS ATLAS. BACKGROUND

Extreme Rain all Frequency Analysis for Louisiana

CONVERTING A NEXRAD MAP TO A FLOODPLAIN MAP. Oscar Robayo, Tim Whiteaker, and David Maidment*

Near Real-Time Runoff Estimation Using Spatially Distributed Radar Rainfall Data. Jennifer Hadley 22 April 2003

Rainfall and Design Storms

The Stochastic Event Flood Model Applied to Minidoka Dam on the Snake River, Idaho

A Comparative Study of the National Water Model Forecast to Observed Streamflow Data

TEMPORAL DISTIRUBTION OF PMP RAINFALL AS A FUNCTION OF AREA SIZE. Introduction

Talk Overview. Concepts. Climatology. Monitoring. Applications

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

Technical Memorandum No

CW3E Atmospheric River Outlook

Tri-Agency Fusion Team Brief Interagency Coordination Meeting Improving Joint Operations. USACE/USGS/NWS Silver Spring, MD. Friday, 11 June 2010

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Wind Report. Robinson, Smith & Walsh. John Smith. July 1, 2017 REFERENCE: 1 Maple Street, Houston, TX 77034

Lecture 6: Precipitation Averages and Interception

Storm rainfall. Lecture content. 1 Analysis of storm rainfall 2 Predictive model of storm rainfall for a given

Groundwater dynamics and surface water-groundwater interaction in a prograding delta island, Louisiana, USA

Technical Memorandum No RAINFALL

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES OUTLOOK

Typical Hydrologic Period Report (Final)

Probable Maximum Precipitation Study

Technical Memorandum. City of Salem, Stormwater Management Design Standards. Project No:

SEPTEMBER 2013 REVIEW

Final Report. COMET Partner's Project. University of Texas at San Antonio

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Wind Report. Robinson, Smith & Walsh. John Smith REFERENCE:

An Alternative Temporal Rainfall Distribution for Hydrologic Analysis and Design

Assessing Arid Area Extreme Precipitation Using Doppler Radar and Rain Gages

Recent Updates to NOAA/NWS Precipitation Frequency Estimates

Chapter 10 - Sacramento Method Examples

Needs to Update Probable Maximum Precipitation for Determining Hydrologic Loading on Dams

Designing a Dam for Blockhouse Ranch. Haley Born

Great Lakes Update. Great Lakes Winter and Spring Summary January June Vol. 187 Great Lakes Update August 2012

A GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author: Allison Guettner

Speakers: NWS Buffalo Dan Kelly and Sarah Jamison, NERFC Jeane Wallace. NWS Flood Services for the Black River Basin

1. TEMPORAL CHANGES IN HEAVY RAINFALL FREQUENCIES IN ILLINOIS

Rapid Flood Mapping Using Inundation Libraries

Evaluation and Incorporation of USACE HEC-RAS Model of Chicago Waterway System into the Development of the North Branch DWP

Changes to Extreme Precipitation Events: What the Historical Record Shows and What It Means for Engineers

Dam Safety: Revisiting PMPs

Surface Hydrology Research Group Università degli Studi di Cagliari

Robert Shedd Northeast River Forecast Center National Weather Service Taunton, Massachusetts, USA

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

MEMORANDUM. Situation. David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA Ph Fx

Rucker Pond. Background

National Flood Interoperability Experiment

USING GIS TO MODEL AND ANALYZE HISTORICAL FLOODING OF THE GUADALUPE RIVER NEAR NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS

CW3E Atmospheric River Update Outlook Strong AR forecast to impact California this weekend - A strong AR with IVT as high as 1000 kg m -1 s -1 is

Severe Weather Potential for Southeast Texas

Overview of a Changing Climate in Rhode Island

Ed Tomlinson, PhD Bill Kappel Applied Weather Associates LLC. Tye Parzybok Metstat Inc. Bryan Rappolt Genesis Weather Solutions LLC

Stochastic Modeling of Extreme Floods on the American River at Folsom Dam

Stochastic Modeling of Extreme Floods on the American River at Folsom Dam

What Is the Weather Like in Different Regions of the United States?

Delaware River Flood Advisory Committee

*Corresponding author address: Charles Barrere, Weather Decision Technologies, 1818 W Lindsey St, Norman, OK

Radar Analysis for Design Storm Application

Presented by Jerry A. Gomez, P.E. National Hydropower Association Northeast Regional Meeting - September 17, 2009

Transcription:

The Beleaguered Figure 15 TFMA 2015 Fall Technical Summit After the Floods: Texas Rising Craig Loftin, PE, CFM

US Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40, Figure 15

Village Creek Watershed

100-Year 30-Minute Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 1-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 2-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 3-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 6-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 12-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 24-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 30-Minute Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 1-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 2-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 3-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 6-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 12-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

100-Year 24-Hour Rainfall (Inches)

Dallas TP-40 Data

Dallas TP-40 Data

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4044

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4044

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4044

Location Parameter 15-Minute Duration

Location Parameter 30-Minute Duration

Location Parameter 60-Minute Duration

Location Parameter 1-Hour Duration

Location Parameter 2-Hour Duration

Location Parameter 3-Hour Duration

Location Parameter 6-Hour Duration

Location Parameter 12-Hour Duration

Location Parameter 24-Hour Duration

Location Parameter 1-Day Duration

Scale Parameter 15-Minute Duration

Scale Parameter 30-Minute Duration

Scale Parameter 60-Minute Duration

Scale Parameter 1-Hour Duration

Scale Parameter 2-Hour Duration

Scale Parameter 3-Hour Duration

Scale Parameter 6-Hour Duration

Scale Parameter 12-Hour Duration

Scale Parameter 24-Hour Duration

Scale Parameter 1-Day Duration

Shape Parameter 15-Minute Duration

Shape Parameter 30-Minute Duration

Shape Parameter 60-Minute Duration

Shape Parameter 1-Hour Duration

Shape Parameter 2-Hour Duration

Shape Parameter 3-Hour Duration

Shape Parameter 6-Hour Duration

Shape Parameter 12-Hour Duration

Shape Parameter 24-Hour Duration

USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5041

USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5041

USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5041

USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5041

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 15-Minute Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 30-Minute Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 1-Hour Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 2-Hour Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 3-Hour Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 6-Hour Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 12-Hour Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 12-Hour Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 1-Day Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 2-Day Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 3-Day Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 5-Day Duration

Depth of Precipitation, 100-Year Storm 3-Day Duration

NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDRO-35

2-Year 60-Minute Precipitation (inches)

100-Year 60-Minute Precipitation (inches)

2-Year 5-Minute Precipitation (inches)

100-Year 5-Minute Precipitation (inches)

2-Year 15-Minute Precipitation (inches)

100-Year 15-Minute Precipitation (inches)

HYDRO-35 Data at Dallas

HYDRO-35 Data at Dallas

Spliced and Adjusted Results at Dallas

Spliced and Adjusted Results at Dallas

Expanded Results at Dallas

Expanded Results at Dallas

Mass Curve

Redistributed Mass Curve

Distributed Storm (5-minute time step)

Distributed Storm (15-minute time step)

Distributed Storm (30-minute time step)

Distributed Storm (1-hour time step)

Distributed Storm (2-hour time step)

Distributed Storm (3-hour time step)

Distributed Storm (6-hour time step)

Distributed Storm (12-hour time step)

Distributed Storm (24-hour time step)

NUDALLAS/SWFHYD Precipitation Inputs

HEC-1 Precipitation Inputs

HEC-HMS Precipitation Inputs

HEC-HMS Precipitation Inputs

HEC-1 and HEC-HMS Point to Areal Depth Conversion

HEC-1 and HEC-HMS Area Reduction Factor (ARF)

Improved fit by adding an area multiplier per duration

Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40

Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 29, Part 1 The Ohio Valley

WB TP-29, Part 1 The Ohio Valley Sources of Rainfall Data

WB TP-29, Part 1 The Ohio Valley ARF Curves and Map of Dense Networks

WB TP-29, Part 1 The Ohio Valley Example Computation of ARF

WB TP-29, Part 1 The Ohio Valley Network Area, Subdivision, and Limitations

WB TP-29, Part 1 The Ohio Valley Duration a major Parameter but Depth not a Parameter

WB TP-29, Part 1 The Ohio Valley Need for Judgment and Basis of ARF Curves

Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 29, Part 2 Southeastern US

WB TP-29, Part 2 Southeastern US Sources of Rainfall Data

WB TP-29, Part 2 Southeastern US Map of Nationwide Dense Networks

WB TP-29, Part 2 Southeastern US Nationwide Dense Network Statistics

WB TP-29, Part 2 Southeastern US ARF Curves

WB TP-29, Part 2 Southeastern US Example Computation of ARF

WB TP-29, Part 2 Southeastern US Discussion of various Area-Depth Relationships

US Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40, Figure 15

NOAA Technical Report NWS 24

NOAA Technical Report NWS 24 2-Year Depth-Area Ratios at Chicago

NOAA Technical Report NWS 24 100-Year Depth-Area Ratios at Chicago

NOAA Technical Report NWS 24 Extended 2-Year Depth-Area Ratios at Chicago

NOAA Technical Report NWS 24 Commentary on Nature of Classical ARFs

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4267

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4267

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4267

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4267 Frequency Considerations

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4267 Empirical Depth-Distance Relations for Austin, Dallas, Houston

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4267 ARFs for 1-Day Design Storms at Austin, Dallas, Houston

USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4267 Observation re. applicability relative to watershed TOC.

Journal of Hydrology Article: Precipitation areal-reduction factor estimation using an annual-maxima centered approach

TX Transportation Inst. at A&M Report 0-4642-3: Calculation of Areal Reduction Factors Using NEXRAD Precipitation Estimates

TX Transportation Inst. at A&M Report 0-4642-3: Calculation of Areal Reduction Factors Using NEXRAD Precipitation Estimates

TTI at A&M Report 0-4642 ARF-Area Plot for Region 4, Storm Duration of 24 Hours

TTI at A&M Report 0-4642 ARF-Area Plots for Region 4, Storm Duration of 24 Hours

TTI at A&M Report 0-4642 Comparison with Former Studies

TTI at A&M Report 0-4642 Comparison or ARF-Area curves to those from other studies

% of Total Depth USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research Figure 15 Extension (All Storms - 24 Hour) 100% HEC-1/HEC-HMS Equation 90% 80% 70% 60% Proposed Extension Curve 50% 40% 1981 Area-Depth 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Area in Sq. Mi.

% of Total Depth USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research 100% Figure 15 Extension (All Storms - 24 Hour) HEC-1/HEC-HMS Equation 90% Proposed Extension Curve 80% 70% 1981 Area-Depth Curve 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Area in Sq. Mi.

% of Total Depth USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research 1.00 0.90 Figure 15 Extension (All Storms - 6 Hour) HEC-1/HEC-HMS Equation 0.80 0.70 0.60 10-Oct 1981 0.50 0.40 0.30 Proposed Extension Curve 1981 Area-Depth Curve HEC-1 Proposed Extension Curve 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Area in Sq. Mi.

% of Total Depth USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research 1.00 0.90 Figure 15 Extension (All Storms - 6 Hour) HEC-1/HEC-HMS Equation 0.80 Proposed Extension Curve 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 1981 Area-Depth Curve 10-Oct 1981 HEC-1 Proposed Extension Curve 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Area in Sq. Mi.

% of Total Depth USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research 1.00 Figure 15 Extension (All Storms - 1 Hour) 0.90 0.80 HEC-1/HEC-HMS Equation 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 HEC-1/ HEC-HMS Equation 10-Oct 1981 0.30 1981 Area-Depth Curve 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Area in Sq. Mi.

% of Total Depth USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research 1.00 Figure 15 Extension (All Storms - 1 Hour) 0.90 0.80 HEC-1/HEC-HMS Equation 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 1981 Area-Depth Curve HEC-1/ HEC-HMS Equation 10-Oct 1981 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Area in Sq. Mi.

USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research

USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research

US Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40, Figure 15

The Changing Paradigm for Configuring Hypothetical Storms - more robust use of recorded storm events as proxies - attempts to define specific frequencies for those events - potential use of bracketed durations - attempts to establish appropriate/consistent ARFs - attempts to optimize elliptical storm position

USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research

USACE SWF Upper Trinity River Basin research

In this presenter s view, with regards to the NFIP Consistency has greater net value than does perceived accuracy. We should strive to let our truly meaningful technical experiences gained over time be our primary guide.

Questions and Discussion