Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Similar documents
Columbia Estuary Province

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

Ecosystem response during the removal of the Elwha River Dams

The Effects of Geomorphology and Watershed Land Use on Spawning Habitat

Evaluation of Geomorphic Effects of Removal of Marmot and Little Sandy Dams and Potential Impacts on Anadromous Salmonids

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Continued)

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

Restoring the Napa River:

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Assessment. Assessment

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Jeff Opperman Final Report for Fellowship R/SF-4

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

-- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island

HUMAN IMPACTS AND RIVER CHANNEL ADJUSTMENT, NORTHEASTERN OREGON: IMPLICATIONS FOR RESTORATION. Patricia F. McDowell 1 INTRODUCTION

What is a watershed or landscape perspective?

Appendix I: The Summit-at-Snoqualmie Master Development Plan Proposal FEIS Physical and Biological Resource Data Tables

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Case Study 8. North Fork Nooksack River In-channel Project

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Best Management Practices for Coldwater Fisheries Enhancement and Restoration

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

Blue Mountain Province

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Forest Service AOP Meeting Objectives of Stream Simulation: Examples and Talking Points

GARCIA RIVER SEDIMENT TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

Hannah Moore CEE Juvenile Bull Trout Distribution in the South Fork Walla Walla River, Oregon

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

Sprague River Basin Restoration Post Project Evaluations: Lessons Learned and Future Applications

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Restoring Entrenched Rivers: lessons learned from the

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Calapooia Basin RBA Snorkel Survey Brief. Surveys conducted by Bio-Surveys, LLC. (Steve Trask and Conrad Gowell)

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Business. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?

Unconventional Wisdom and the Effects of Dams on Downstream Coarse Sediment Supply. Byron Amerson, Jay Stallman, John Wooster, and Derek Booth

Carex nudata, a native sedge, as facilitator of restoration goals following passive restoration

The River Continuum Concept (or not?) Stream Classification

Options looking forward for sediment management in the Alameda Creek Flood Control Channel

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Landslide Computer Modeling Potential

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

The Danube River. Hydrological Connectivity and Human Influence. By: Pat O Connell, Pat Wilkins, Tiana Royer, and Kevin Gaitsch

Photo 1: Assen Brothers Splash Dam in 1912, Middle Creek Oregon. Photo courtesy of Coos County Historical Society

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

1 INTRODUCTION AND MAJOR FINDINGS... 1

River Nith restoration, cbec UK Ltd, October 2013 APPENDIX A

Start of Presentation: No notes (Introductory Slide 1) 1) Salmonid Habitat Intrinsic Potential (IP) models are a type of habitat potential

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Sediment and nutrient transport and storage along the urban stream corridor

Executive Summary. Water Quantity

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure. Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Addendum to Upper Clark Fork River Tributaries Sediment, Metals, and Temperature TMDLs and Framework for Water Quality Restoration Appendix J

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

Hydrologic Analysis for Ecosystem Restoration

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Estimating Stream Gradient Using NHD Stream Lines and DEM Data

Science EOG Review: Landforms

Case Study 14. Rocky Creek Vented Box Culvert Ford

Integrating flood mitigation, sediment management and habitat enhancement on coastal rivers of British Columbia

Flood Control of the Willamette River

Summary Report to Assist Development of Ecosystem Flow Recommendations for the Coast Fork and Middle Fork of the Willamette River, Oregon

We are interconnected, we are resilient As air temperatures warm forests change, fires increase glaciers retreat, snowpack diminishes sediment

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Integrated methodology for assessing the effects of geomorphological river restoration on fish habitat and riparian vegetation

Geomorphology Of The Chilliwack River Watershed Landform Mapping At North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington By National Park Service

Development of Riparian Maps for Sonoma County Long Term Riparian Corridor Conservation. Mark Tukman & Dylan Loudon Tukman Geospatial

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

SECTION 2 Table of Contents

Flow regime, floodplain inundation and floodplain waterbody connectivity at Congaree National Park

Squaw Creek. General Information

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Landscape Planning Framework

Channel Assessments of Selected Watersheds within TFL 52

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Steve Pye LA /22/16 Final Report: Determining regional locations of reference sites based on slope and soil type. Client: Sonoma Land Trust

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

Transcription:

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Project Location The project is located in the South Fork McKenzie River Watershed, approximately 50 miles east of the town of Eugene, Oregon. The project area is approximately 834 acres in size and is located in along the South Fork McKenzie River from the base of Cougar Dam to the confluence with the McKenzie River (approximately 4.5 miles). This area includes the mainstem channel and all current and historic side channels and floodplain. Most of the project area is under Forest Service ownership, except for approximately 32 acres owned by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The figures below provide further information about the project location. Figure 1 shows the location of the McKenzie River Ranger District. The location of the project (outlined in red) in relation to the McKenzie River sub-basin (outlined in blue) is shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the entire project area. Purpose and Need The purpose of this project is to improve ecological function and biological productivity for ESA- Threatened spring Chinook salmon and bull trout, Pacific lamprey and other native fish, western pond turtle, amphibians, beaver, and waterfowl. Historically, the lower South Fork was a large alluvial fan with a complex network of side channels and frequently inundated floodplain (Figure 4). It was a depositional zone for much of the sediment, wood, and nutrients coming out of the South Fork drainage. As is typical of low gradient, alluvial fans, this area was very biologically productive. According to 1937 surveys, the South Fork was the most important tributary for spring Chinook salmon spawning and the confluence area was known as a bull trout paradise that was intensively fished. Unfortunately, the South Fork has been significantly altered in the last century. Cougar Dam was built by 1963 for flood control and power generation. Associated with construction of the dam was straightening and channelization of the lower river with substantial amounts of levee and riprap material. In addition, large wood was removed from the river for timber and navigation purposes. These combined activities have limited the sediment and wood supply, altered the flow regime, reduced channel complexity, and restricted off-channel and floodplain connectivity. A recent habitat survey revealed very low pool habitat (12%) and wood abundance (<10 pieces/mile). The dominant substrate in both pools and riffles is cobble too large for spawning. Fine sediment is no longer deposited onto floodplains, limiting nesting habitat for turtles. Although Cougar Dam presents a major obstacle to floodplain restoration by altering flows and blocking wood, sediment, and nutrients, management actions can significantly improve conditions. By removing levees and riprap and adding large wood and sediment we will: Increase pools and pockets of slow water so fish can rest, Provide cover from predators,

Retain gravels necessary for fish spawning and fine sediment needed for lamprey rearing and western pond turtle nesting, and Maintain a well-connected floodplain with abundant side channels, ponds, and wetlands for amphibians, beaver, waterfowl, and fry and juvenile fish rearing. Recent studies indicate that stream biodiversity and productivity is greatest in streams that have a complex network of side channels (Cluer and Thorne 2013, Martens and Connolly 2014). Complex streams with a well-connected floodplain can be up to 250% more biologically productive than single thread channels (Bellmore et al. 2013). A review of projects designed to restore floodplain connectivity and side channel habitat increased salmon and trout production by 27-34% (Ogsten et al. 2014). By adding large wood to Deer Creek, we will be creating these habitat features (pools, cover, gravel, side channels) that are important for native fish and wildlife. Proposed Action This project proposes the following activities: Approximately 49 acres of levees (embankments built to prevent the overflow of a river) and riprap (material used to armor stream banks against scour and erosion) would be removed from stream banks and historic floodplains using heavy equipment. Material would be sorted on site and used for channel reconstruction and gravel augmentation within project area. Gravel and other sediment would be sourced from levee material removed within the project area and placed either at select locations suitable for spawning or in areas where the gravel will be transported into spawning reaches. Stream channel reconstruction, using heavy equipment, would occur throughout the project area to restore a more natural channel form, shape, and profile. Up to 4,000 pieces of large wood would be placed in stream channels and across adjacent floodplains. All temporary roads and areas of disturbance would be rehabilitated and replanted with native vegetation. The ground disturbance would mostly occur within the stream channels and from tipping trees on the edges of the current and historic channels. Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project 2

Figure 1 and 2 - Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project 3

Figure 3 - Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project Area Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project 4

Figure 4 - A LiDAR Bare Earth image (with vegetation removed) revealing the historic alluvial fan and complex channel network of the lower South Fork McKenzie River. References Bellmore, J.R., C.V. Baxter, P. Connolly, and K.D. Martens. 2013. The floodplain food web mosaic: a study of its importance to salmon and steelhead with implications for their recovery. Ecological Applications, 23(1): 189-207. Cluer, B.L. and Thorne, C.R., 2013. A stream evolution model integrating habitat and ecosystem benefits. River Research and Applications. Martens, K.D., and P.J. Connolly. 2014. Juvenile anadromous salmonids production in Upper Columbia River side channels with different levels of hydrological connection. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 143:757-767. Ogston, Lindsey et al. 2014. Watershed scale effectiveness of flood plain habitat restoration for juvenile coho salmon in the Chilliwack River, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2015, 72(4): 479-490. Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project 5