Feasibility Study for Potential Removal of McLane & Goldman Dams Souhegan River, Milford, NH. Public Kick-off Meeting

Similar documents
Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Best Management Practices for Coldwater Fisheries Enhancement and Restoration

Estimated Sediment Volume: Bridge Street Dam Impoundment, Royal River, Yarmouth, Maine

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Fish Passage Studies III: Sediment Redistribution and Impact Analysis: Springborn Dam - Enfield, Connecticut

DAM REMOVAL ENGINEERING ISSUES & OPTIONS

A PRIMER ON DAM REMOVALS IN MICHIGAN. Joe Rathbun Michigan Dept. Environmental Quality

Little Swan Lake. Dam Inspection & Siltation Study Prepared By: William Klingner, P.E., CFM October 28, 2018

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Addressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms

Lower Snake River Programmatic Sediment Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

New Approaches to Restoring NH s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Identifying, Understanding and Addressing Flood-Related Hazards

GEOMORPHIC RESPONSE TO THE REMOVAL OF THE MERRIMACK VILLAGE DAM ON THE SOUHEGAN RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE: RESULTS FROM SIX YEARS OF MONITORING

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Heather Schlosser Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Studies Group August 28, 2008

Griswold Creek August 22, 2013

Important Copyright Information

Biological Response to the Gold King Mine Release in the Animas and San Juan Rivers

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

President s Day Weekend Storm Community Meeting and Workshop April 17, 2017

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

Terms of Reference for the Comparative Environmental Review (CER) of. Options for the Mactaquac Project, Mactaquac, New Brunswick

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Working with Natural Stream Systems

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

CE415L Applied Fluid Mechanics Laboratory

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Activities in Earth Sciences

Colony Creek Colony Mountain Drive Sediment Management and Flood Protection Evaluation Final Report

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Stabilization Study. Prepared For: The Town of Bethlehem. Henry Hudson Park Shoreline Stabilization Study. June 2011

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

Rock Sizing for Waterway & Gully Chutes

RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Flooding in Dolgellau

DREDGING A land manager s guide to the rules

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

East Branch Grand Calumet River Great Lakes Legacy Act Sediment Remediation and Restoration Project

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

Sediment Traps. CAG Meeting May 21, 2012

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Evaluation of Public Safety at Run-of-River Dams

Woodstock, Route 26 Stream Relocation Project

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES. Page

White River Update. Jeanne Stypula, Supervising Engineer. Advisory Committee Meeting April 26, 2016

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

GIS Data and Technology to Support Transportation & MPO Decision-Making & Planning. using an Eco-Logical* Approach within the Kansas City Region

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

THE NEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL SPILLWAY AT THE SANFORD DAM BOILING SPRING LAKES, NC. Presentation for The Brunswick County Commissioners April 20, 2015

Sediment Management for Dam Removals

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois

Route 88 Effects on the Town of Westport. Life time observations. By: Claude A. Ledoux

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

NEWS RELEASE UNDER SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (33 USC 1344) ACTION NUMBER SPA ABQ

CASE STUDIES. Introduction

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

CFD Modeling for Structure Designs in Environmental Impacts Mitigation

Planning for the Future of Humboldt Bay: Sea Level Rise, Sediment Management, Sand Spits and Salt Marshes. Joel Gerwein

Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Tata Pond Dam

Adaptation to Sea Level Rise A Regional Approach

What is a watershed or landscape perspective?

Flood Inundation Mapping

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

CASE STUDY BINGA, PHILIPPINES

Technical Review of Pak Beng Hydropower Project (1) Hydrology & Hydraulics and (2) Sediment Transport & River Morphology

GEOMORPHIC CHANGES IN LOWER CACHE CREEK 2012

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Alexandra Carvalho, Ph.D., GISP Kathy Fitzpatrick, P.E.

CASE STUDY BINGA, PHILIPPINES

Fish Passage and Abundance around Grade Control Structures on Incised Streams in Western Iowa

WELCOME Lake Wabukayne OPEN HOUSE

Monitoring Scour Critical Bridges During Floods For Local Bridge Owners. Presented by

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Session 1 Healthy Streams Stream Hydraulics Natural Channel Design

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

New Hampshire s Flood Hazards Geodatabase

THE TRINITY RIVER VISION/ GATEWAY PARK / PANTHER ISLAND

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

L OWER N OOKSACK R IVER P ROJECT: A LTERNATIVES A NALYSIS A PPENDIX A: H YDRAULIC M ODELING. PREPARED BY: LandC, etc, LLC

Frequently Asked Questions about River Corridors

West Branch of the St. Mary s River Restoration Project 2017 Post Construction Report

Wetlands and Riparian Mapping Framework Technical Meeting

Special Public Notice

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Degradation Concerns related to Bridge Structures in Alberta

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Transcription:

Feasibility Study for Potential Removal of McLane & Goldman Dams Souhegan River, Milford, NH Public Kick-off Meeting Mark Wamser Gomez and Sullivan Engineers, P.C. 603-428-4960 Aug 16, 2010

Agenda Opening Remarks - Guy Scaife, Town Administrator Presentation - Mark Wamser, Gomez and Sullivan Who is providing funding and/or technical assistance? Project features Why consider dam removal? What s involved in a feasibility study? What s the project schedule? Who do I contact? Questions/comments

Who is providing funding and/or technical assistance? Collectively known as Project Partners Funding Sources: NH Charitable Foundation- Community Impact Grant EPA 319 Watershed Restoration Grant American Rivers NOAA Community-based Restoration Program Trout Unlimited- Embrace-A-Stream Town of Milford Technical Assistance: Town of Milford NH Dept of Environmental Services/EPA National Oceanic & Atmospheric Adm, National Marine Fisheries US Fish and Wildlife Service American Rivers Gomez and Sullivan Engineers

Project Features Left Rte 13 Bridge Goldman Dam Flow Right Sewer Line McLane Dam Impoundment Footbridge McLane Dam Milford Mill Apts Goldman Dam Impoundment Granite Square Apts

Granite Town Plaza Keyes Memorial Field

McLane Dam Flow Direction Spillway- 180 feet Low-Level Outlet Town-owned Original Construction 1846- stone masonry Reconstructed 1992- concrete over stone and existing concrete Low Hazard Dam

Low Level Outlet Upstream Height ~ 18 feet Spillway Downstream Photo 8-5-10

Low Level Outlet Boards can be removed to lower water level behind dam Leakage- dropping water level

Sewer Line Sewer Line Flow Goldman Dam

Goldman Dam Low Level Outlet Spillway- 173 feet Owned by Minor via Helen Goodwin Trust Original Construction 1810 Last Reconstructed 1960s Low Hazard Dam (currently being considered for reclassification by NHDES to high hazard)

Inoperable Gates Lots of Bedrock Upstream Downstream

Low Level Outlet Upstream Downstream Undermining of Dam

Low Level Outlet Upstream Downstream

Downstream Side of Low Level Outlet (stoplogs partially removed) Stoplogs Downstream

Downstream Side of Route 13 Bridge Abutment Flow Center Pier Town-owned Original Construction 1846- stone (constructed after Goldman Dam) Widened 1931

Why Consider Dam Removal? Both impoundments are on NH Dept of Env Services 303(d) list of impaired waters (dissolved oxygen and e.coli). Both dams may contribute to upstream flooding. Both dams block passage of resident & migratory fish. Both dams are a liability, potential safety hazard, require continual operation, maintenance and repairs and require an expenditure of taxpayer monies. Both dams have an Annual Dam Registration Fee. Grant funding available to offset costs of feasibility study and potential future removal.

What s involved in a feasibility study? Study will evaluate the impacts of dam removal on: River depth and width ( hydraulics ) absent the dams Flooding Sediment (sand/silt) deposited behind each dam Infrastructure (sewer line and Route 13 bridge) Water Sediment Dam Environmental resources (fish, wetlands and wildlife) Cultural resources (above ground structures such as the dams & below ground artifacts)

How much will the river change above the dams? A hydraulic model will be developed from below McLane Dam to above Goldman Dam to estimate the following with the dams removed: The new channel width, depth, & velocity in the former impoundments. Estimate likelihood of impounded sediments being naturally transported downstream. Determine whether fish can pass through the project reach. Determine whether the Rte 13 Bridge center pier & abutments could be scoured. Determine whether the sewer line could be scoured and become exposed.

If dams are removed Channel width will decrease Depth will decrease Velocity will increase New River Width??

Determine Quality and Quantity of Sediment behind both Dams Goldman Dam Considerable existing information as part of Fletcher s Paint Superfund Site. McLane Dam Sediment volume will be quantified by driving steel probes to refusal. Sediment cores will be collected for contaminant testing. Likelihood of sediments becoming mobile if dams are removed will be evaluated using the hydraulic model. Sediment quantity/quality and sediment transport analysis will dictate management options (partial dredge, full dredge, natural transport).

Sediment Probing to Quantify Volume Sediment Core for Lab Testing Sediment Core Sampling

McLane Dam- Sediment Sampling X-sections X-sections used to quantify sediment volume. Monuments (such as rebar) placed on right and left banks. Important not to disturb monuments! Rebar with Cap

Will removing the dams decrease flooding? April 2007 Flood ~ 50 year flood. Neither dam provides flood protection ; they operate as run-of-river. Both dams artificially raise the water level of the river. Hydraulic model will be used to determine the 100-year flood (and other floods) inundation area with the dams removed.

Current 100-year Flood Inundation Area North River Road Fields Current 500-yr Current 100-yr Post Removal 100-yr? Boys and Girls Club Dams Removed- 100-yr Flood Inundation Area??? Goldman Dam Granite Town Plaza Brookstone Apts Keyes Memorial Park Rte 13 Bridge

River Profile Flow Direction 50-yr flood 100-yr flood 500-yr flood 10-yr flood McLane Dam Goldman Dam

Infrastructure Evaluate the impact of dam removal on sewer line traversing the McLane Dam impoundment. Rte 13 Bridge center pier & abutments above Goldman Dam. scour analysis will be conducted on both structures. Fire Department Right Abutment Sewer Line Center Pier

Sewer Line Location in Plan View Goldman Dam Flow Sewer Line

Sewer Line Profile View Amhert Street Looking in downstream direction Souhegan River Souhegan River is flowing into the slide

Wetlands, Wildlife, Fisheries Wetland Delineation will be conducted Survey flags will be placed along the shoreline to mark wetland boundaries and top of bank. During delineation, identify wildlife, and rare, threatened or endangered species. Coordinating with NH Natural Heritage Bureau, NH Fish and Game and US Fish and Wildlife Service. Determine if fish passage can occur if dams are removed. Evaluate if fish habitat below dams could be impacted by allowing natural sediment transport.

Cultural Resources Work to be conducted by Public Archeological Laboratory. All work closely coordinated with NH Division of Historic Resources. Phase IA Archeological Assessment Evaluate likelihood of archeological resources in project area. Dependent on findings may require Phase IB Assessment- digging test pits. Phase I Historic Architectural Assessment Project Area Form Individual Dam Inventory Forms NOAA is the lead federal agency relative to Section 106 consultation. Goldman Dam- date unknown McLane Dam- 1935

Dam Removal will not. Result in drying up the river- the same amount of water will flow downstream. Result in increased flooding- the dams do not provide any flood protection; only contribute to flooding.

What s the Project Schedule? Overall Project ~ 1 year to complete Field Work- Sep and/or Oct 2010 Wetland Delineation Upland survey along the shorelines Setting monuments (rebar) near the shoreline between McLane & Goldman Dams Bathymetric and sediment mapping Archeological/Architectural Site Investigation On-water investigation of Rte 13 Bridge Letter being sent to Abutters requesting access to property to complete field work Meetings with Granite Square Apts on 8/17/2010 and Milford Mill Apts on 8/24/10 2 Additional Public Mtgs at milestone dates Feasibility study available to public - summer 2011 Town will make informed decision on next steps, if any. If feasible, engineering plans, permitting and raise funds for removal (not part of this feasibility project).

Who do I contact? Mark Wamser, PE Water Resource Engineer Gomez and Sullivan Engineers PO Box 2179 Henniker, NH 03242 603-428-4960 mwamser@gomezandsullivan.com Guy Scaife Town Administrator One Union Square Milford, NH 03055 603-673-2257 gscaife@milford,nh.gov Dawn Griska Executive Secretary One Union Square Milford, NH 03055 603-673-2257 dgriska@milford.nh.gov

Questions/Comments if you have questions or need additional information