Neutron-SER Modeling & Simulation for 0.18pm CMOS Technology

Similar documents
Introduction. Neutron Effects NSEU. Neutron Testing Basics User Requirements Conclusions

Monte Carlo Simulation of Neutrons, Protons, Ions and Alpha Particles Involved in Soft Errors in Advanced Memories

Radiation-induced soft errors in digital circuits

Design of Fast and Robust State Elements

Application Note to inform ANVO Customers about the Soft Error Rate Phenomenon which could potentially occur in our nvsrams.

Stability of Semiconductor Memory Characteristics in a Radiation Environment

Assessment of Soft Errors due to Alpha Emissions from Presolder on Flip Chip Devices Rick Wong, Shi-Jie Wen, Peng Su, Li Li 10/30/09

Gate-Level Mitigation Techniques for Neutron-Induced Soft Error Rate

Estec final presentation days 2018

Radiation Effects on Electronics. Dr. Brock J. LaMeres Associate Professor Electrical & Computer Engineering Montana State University

Single Event Effects: SRAM

EECS150 - Digital Design Lecture 26 - Faults and Error Correction. Types of Faults in Digital Designs

SOFT-ERROR SUSCEPTIBILITY OF FinFET SRAMs

Alpha Particle and Neutron-induced Soft Error Rates and Scaling Trends in SRAM

A Low-Cost Methodology for Soft Error Free Logic Circuits

The need for a large-area low emissivity alpha particle standard

ELECTRONIC circuits encode information in the form of a

APA750 and A54SX32A LANSCE Neutron Test Report. White Paper

Virtual Irradiation: Single Event Rate Prediction for Advanced Technologies

Radiation Effect Modeling

Analysis of cosmic ray neutron-induced single-event phenomena

Radiation Effect Modeling

Analysis of Soft Error Rates for future technologies

Compact Modelling of Single Event Transient in Bulk MOSFET for SPICE: Application to Elementary Circuit

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

FOUNDATIONS OF NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY

Application of the RADSAFE Concept

Technology Mapping for Reliability Enhancement in Logic Synthesis

Soft Error Rate Determination for Nanometer CMOS VLSI Circuits

Cosmic Rays. This showed that the energy of cosmic rays was many times that of any other natural or artificial radiation known at that time.

Electron-induced Single-Event Upsets in integrated memory device

A Monte Carlo Simulation for Estimating of the Flux in a Novel Neutron Activation System using 252 Cf Source

Alpha-particle Stopping Powers in Air and Argon

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Generalized SiGe HBT Event Rate Predictions Using MRED

Soft Error Rate Analysis in Combinational Logic

Future trends in radiation hard electronics

Impact of Ion Energy and Species on Single Event Effect Analysis

Nuclear contribution into single-event upset in 3D on-board electronics at moderate energy cosmic proton impact

Chemistry 1000 Lecture 3: Nuclear stability. Marc R. Roussel

Soft Error Simulations

SINGLE Event Upset (SEU) is caused by radiation induced

Test Simulation of Neutron Damage to Electronic Components using Accelerator Facilities

Measurement of 39 Ar in Underground Argon for Dark Matter Experiments

Transistor Sizing for Radiation Hardening

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

Analysis of γ spectrum

IMPACT OF COSMIC RADIATION ON AVIATION RELIABILITY AND SAFETY

Tradeoff between Reliability and Power Management

Those Upsetting Ions-The Effects of Radiation on Electronics

Today, I will present the first of two lectures on neutron interactions.

Subatomic Particles. proton. neutron. electron. positron. particle. 1 H or 1 p. 4 α or 4 He. 0 e or 0 β

Electrical modeling of the photoelectric effect induced by a pulsed laser applied to an SRAM cell

6 C, in units of y 1.

Correlation of Life Testing to Accelerated Soft Error Testing. Helmut Puchner Cypress Semiconductor

Scaling of MOS Circuits. 4. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) 6. Scaling factors for device parameters

SILICON dynamic random-access memories (DRAMs) are

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 21 (11/29/06) Detection of Nuclear Radiation: Pulse Height Spectra

A Technology-Agnostic MTJ SPICE Model with User-Defined Dimensions for STT-MRAM Scalability Studies

Analysis of Ion Implantation Profiles for Accurate Process/Device Simulation: Analysis Based on Quasi-Crystal Extended LSS Theory

Development of Contactless Method of the DUT Heating during Single-Event Effect Tests

FLCC Seminar. Spacer Lithography for Reduced Variability in MOSFET Performance

Nuclear Chemistry. The Nucleus. Isotopes. Slide 1 / 43. Slide 2 / 43. Slide 3 / 43

Chapter 2 Single Event Effects: Mechanisms and Classification

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

PoS(ICHEP2016)474. SoLid: Search for Oscillations with a Lithium-6 Detector at the SCK CEN BR2 reactor

Statistical Reliability Modeling of Field Failures Works!

Nonionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) for Protons

Neutron-Induced Soft Error Analysis in MOSFETs from a 65nm to a 25 nm Design Rule using Multi-Scale Monte Carlo Simulation Method

ON THE IMPACT OF DEVICE ORIENTATION ON THE MULTIPLE CELL UPSET RADIATION RESPONSE IN NANOSCALE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS. Alan Douglas Tipton.

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (40 hours)

Determination of the cosmic-ray-induced neutron flux and ambient dose equivalent at flight altitude

RADIOACTIVITY. Nature of Radioactive Emissions

Device 3D. 3D Device Simulator. Nano Scale Devices. Fin FET

2-Mbit (128K x 16)Static RAM

Slide 1 / 57. Nuclear Physics & Nuclear Reactions Practice Problems

SRAM supply voltage scaling: a reliability perspective

Atomic and Nuclear Radii

Radioactivity. (b) Fig shows two samples of the same radioactive substance. The substance emits β-particles. Fig. 12.1

PoS(ICRC2017)297. Modeling of the Earth atmosphere ionization by a galactic cosmic ray protons with RUSCOSMICS. Speaker. Maurchev E.A. Balabin Yu.V.

Multiple Choice Questions

Quantum Mechanics. Exam 3. Photon(or electron) interference? Photoelectric effect summary. Using Quantum Mechanics. Wavelengths of massive objects

Nuclear Science A Teacher s Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart 1998 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP)

DRAM Reliability: Parity, ECC, Chipkill, Scrubbing. Alpha Particle or Cosmic Ray. electron-hole pairs. silicon. DRAM Memory System: Lecture 13

EECS150 - Digital Design Lecture 26 Faults and Error Correction. Recap

EE 5344 Introduction to MEMS CHAPTER 5 Radiation Sensors

A r Ω = Solid Angle, A = Area, r = distance

Lecture 15: Scaling & Economics

6. Atomic and Nuclear Physics

R&T PROTON DIRECT IONIZATION

EXAMINATION QUESTIONS (6)

Measurement of Mean μ-lifetime

CRaTER Science Requirements

RADIATION-INDUCED CLOCK JITTER AND RACE

Introduction to Radiation Testing Radiation Environments

molar mass = 0.239kg (1) mass needed = = kg (1) [7]

CS 152 Computer Architecture and Engineering

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

5.0 V 256 K 16 CMOS SRAM

Transcription:

Neutron-SER Modeling & Simulation for 0.18pm CMOS Technology Changhong Dai, Nagib Hakim, Steve Walstra, Scott Hareland, Jose Maiz, Scott Yu, and Shiuh-Wuu Lee Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, California, USA changhong.dai@intel.com Abstract This paper presents a new and physical modeling approach for neutron SER with excellent accuracy demonstrated on SRAMs fabricated using 0.18pm CMOS technology. The SER contribution of each type of recoil ion and a fast roll-off behavior of neutron SER for high QCRIT nodes are reported for the first time. 1 Introduction Neutrons from terrestrial cosmic rays and alpha particles from radioactive impurities in packaging materials are the primary radiation sources that contribute to the softerror rate (SER) of electronic products in non-space applications. While the alpha particle contribution increases at a faster rate as processing technology scales to smaller feature sizes,13' its impact can be minimized using advanced packaging techniques, such as low-emissivity solder materials. Neutron contributions, however, cannot be easily reduced due to the relatively fixed environment and will continue to dominate the logic circuit SER. In the past two decades, many experimental and theoretical studies have been performed to analyze neutron SER, but most of them have used the charge-burst model, which treats all recoil ions collectively, thus preventing detailed understanding of each recoil ion's contribution. [4-81 The chargeburst model also relies on experimental determination of charge collection efficiency, which could be more accurately analyzed using numerical 3D device simulations that provide superior predictability to future technology generations and enable SID doping engineering for SER reduction. WQ Schematic RC Extraction Waveform Time.-.. -. -.- -.- -- :' Nuclear Reaction Geomelry / Q CR~ / ~ a ~ a Physi~~IMmlelBasedNeutmn-SER :' Charge Generation '.i Model FlTSimulation j Charge CollediM 1 I Model i Statistical j ; Algorithms,: Fig. 1. Neutron-SER modeling and simulation methodology and flow

This paper presents a new and physical modeling and simulation approach for neutron SER, shown in Fig. 1, including (1) neutron-silicon-nuclear-reaction-based recoil ion charge generation model, (2) numerical-device-simulation-based charge collection model, and (3) statistical algorithms for FIT (Failure-In-Time) rate simulation. We also present the simulated and experimental neutron-ser results of SRAMs fabricated using 0.18pm CMOS technology.[g1 This paper for the first time reports the SER contribution of each type of recoil ion as well as the fast roll-off behavior of neutron-ser for high QcRm nodes. The physical models and simulation capabilities discussed in this paper have also been used to study the impact of CMOS process scaling and SO1 on soft error rates of logic processes. [Io1 2 Modeling and Simulation Methodology QCRIT for a given node is the critical amount of charge required for a given circuit to switch when a current pulse representing a recoil ion's charge is injected at that node. It is obtained via circuit simulations from the minimum pulse height that logically fails the circuit. Compared to alpha strikes, recoil ions typically have a much faster transient process, resulting in a sharper collection waveform and smaller QCRIT because the circuit node has less time to respond. The neutron SER can then be calculated by computing the total probability of all recoil ions with a collected charge exceeding QcRm. 3 Charge Generation and Collection Modeling As an electrically neutral particle, a neutron can only interact with silicon nuclei through strong interaction, which can produce recoil ions with Zs ranging from 2 (He) to 15 (P). Fig. 2a shows the probabilities of each type of ion produced within a unit volume and time as a function of the recoil ion's kinetic energy. These probabilities are based upon the nuclear reaction cross-sections between monotonic neutrons and silicon nuclei and weighted by the sea-level neutron energy spectrum, as shown in Fig. 2b. [', 'I-''I Secondary neutrons and protons can also be produced, but are not included in the modeling because of their negligible contribution. 1.EOZ -- ---- -- - -Neutron Spectrum I I Recoil ton Kinetic Energy (MeV) 1.Ea l.e+01 1.EW I.E+03 1.E- En (MeV) Fig. 2. (a) Energy transfer probability of recoil ions in neutron-silicon interaction, weighted by the sea level neutron spectrum; (b) Sea level neutron spectrum

The charge generation model is based on the ion energy loss rate in silicon (shown in Fig. 3) and the recoil path location relative to the SID-to-well junction and trench isolations (shown in Fig. 4a). 0 10 20 30 40 50 Recall Ion Kinectic Energy (MeV) Fig. 3. Recoil ion energy loss rate in silicon, simulated using TRIM 1131 The charge collection model is obtained using Intel's proprietary numerical device simulator, by placing a point charge source at various locations near the SID-to-well junction during the transient simulation and measuring the proportion of charge collected. As shown by Fig. 4b, the charge collection efficiency is near 1 inside depletion region and decreases almost linearly outside this region. By combining this collection efficiency with the charge generation function along the recoil path, the total charge collection can be obtained for a given recoil event. Fig. 4 (a) Charge generation model and the general equation for charge collection and FIT calculation; (b) Charge collection efficiency derived from 3D device simulations and its correspondence to the SID-to-well junction doping profile

4 Statistical Algorithms for FIT Simulation A random recoil ion event consists of seven variables: recoil angles (Q, 8), ion nuclear number Z, ion kinetic energy E, and recoil starting location (x, y, z). The distribution associated with Q and 8 is typically assumed to be uniform for the nonelastic scattering events and is sampled linearly. The distribution associated with Z and E can be obtained from Fig. 2a and is sampled with a prioritized order. The distribution associated with the recoil starting location is uniform but not limited to the charge collection box underneath the S/D area, thus making it difficult to capture the contribution of "external" recoil ions. As shown by Fig. 5, a novel technique was developed to use segmented surface areas to count the cumulative probability of external recoil ions entering the charge collection box and the internal cubes to count the probability of "internal" recoil ions. \ # Total Ion Probaba y = TP(E,,Z) For 3D vohe sampling of mtemal recoils TP(E,.z)= ~,~,,,.;wp(e,.z) For ZD surface sampling of external recoils I? and i are the unit vecto n of samphg surface and wn path Fig. 5. The novel technique for effective sampling of recoil ions initiated inside and outside the charge collection box underneath S/D area. The surface area sampling comprehends all recoil ions initiated outside but eventually entering the box. 5 Results and Discussion Fig. 6a shows the simulated and experimentally measured neutron-ser FIT rates of SRAMs fabricated using 0.18~ technology. While the models and simulation algorithms are developed for logic products, SRAMs are usually the most convenient vehicle for verification and calibration. The physical-model-based statistical simulation of neutron SER agrees with the experimental data very well without using any fitting parameters. Both simulated and measured results show a power-law dependence between the FIT rate and QCRIT, which is different from the exponential relationship observed from alpha SER. 13] By examining the SER contribution of each type of recoil ion, as shown in Fig. 6b, we find that each ion type does obey the exponential dependence on QCRIT, just as alpha particles do, revealing the same fundamental SER physics masked by the collective behavior of recoil ions. The

simulated results also show a saturation trend at very low QCRIT, similar to what has been reported before for alpha-ser because of the dominant contribution from secondary alpha particles. [31 At very high QcRm the simulation results show a fast roll-off behavior, which can be physically explained by the exclusive contribution from heavy recoil ions that bear the exponential dependence to make neutron-ser roll off faster than what a power-law predicts. Both trends are extremely critical for accurate SER modeling as well as technology and design planning. - - 1 9 z I 0.1 g 3 z -Simple Power-Law Model -Simulated Data Set I rn Data Set 2 (a) A Data Set 3 0.01 0.001 i 10 100 am (C) Fig. 6. (a) The simulated and experimentally measured neutron-ser FIT rates of the SRAMs fabricated using 0.18mm logic technology. As a collective behavior of neutron-ser, a power-law dependence on QCNT is observed; (b) SER contribution of each type of recoil ion that obeys an exponential dependence on QCRIT. The total neutron-ser is dominated by secondary alpha particles at low QCNT region and heavy ions at high QCRIT region. 6 Conclusions A new and physical neutron-ser modeling and simulation approach has been developed with excellent accuracy demonstrated on SRAMs fabricated using 0.18~ CMOS technology. The SER contribution of each type of recoil ion and a fast rolloff behavior at high QCRIT are reported for the first time. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank H.H.K. Tang of IBM, S. Maston, J. Bordelon and N. Mielke for their critical contribution to this work. References [I] T. C. May et al., "Alpha particle-induced soft errors in dynamic memories", ZEEE TED, vol. ED-26, p. 2, 1979.

[2] J. F. Ziegler et al., "The effect of sea level cosmic rays on elcctronic devices", J. Appl. Phys., vol. 52, p. 4305, 1981. [3] C. Dai et al., "Alpha-SER modeling & simulation for sub-0.25um CMOS technology", Symposium on VLSl Technology, p. 8 1, 1999. [4] J. R. Letaw et al., "Guidelines for predicting single-event upsets in neutron environments", IEEE Truns. Nucl. Sci., vol. 36, p. 2348, 1991. [S] E. Normand, "Single event effects in avionics", IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 43, p. 461, 1996. [6] G. R. Srinivasan et al., "Accurate, predictive modeling of soft error rate due to cosmic rays and chip alpha radiation", leee/irps Proceeding, p. 12, 1994. [7] Y. Tosaka et al., "Measurements & analysis of neutron-reaction-induced charges in a silicon surface region", IEEE Truns. Nucl. Sci., vo1.44, p. 173, 1997. [8] Y. Tosaka et a]., "Measurement and analysis of neutron-induced soft errors in sub-halfmicron CMOS circuits", IEEE TED, vol. ED-45, p. 1453, 1998. [9] S. Yang et a]., "A high perfomlance 180 nm generation logic technology", IEEE IEDM Tech. Digest, p. 197, 1998. [I O] S. Hareland et al., "Impact of CMOS process scaling and SO1 on the soft error rates of logic processes", Symposiunz on VLSI Technology, 200 1. [l I] H. H. K. Tang et al., "Cascade statistical model for nucleon-induced reactions on light nuclei in the energy range 50 MeV - 1 GeV", Phys. Rev., vol. C42, p1598, 1990. [I21 H. H. K. Tang et a]., "Nuclear physics of cosmic ray interaction with semiconductor materials: Particle-induced soft errors from a physicist's perspective", IBM Journul of R&D, 1996. [I 31 J. F. Ziegler et al., TRlM User Munuul, January 1995.