JOUL, Volume 3 Supplemental Information Lightweight Metallic MgB 2 Mediates Polysulfide Redox and Promises High- Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Quan Pang, Chun Yuen Kwok, Dipan Kundu, Xiao Liang, and Linda F. Nazar
Lightweight Metallic MgB2 Mediates Polysulfide Redox and Promises High- Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Quan Pang 1, Chun Yuen Kwok 1, Dipan Kundu 1, Xiao Liang 1, Linda F. Nazar* 1,2 1.Department of Chemistry and the Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada 2. Lead Contact Correspondence: lfnazar@uwaterloo.ca Figure S1. SEM image of the boron nanopowder used for the synthesis of MgB 2 and the TEM image of the MgB 2 synthesized without carbon nanopowder. Figure S2. The most stable geometry of Li 2S, Li 2S 2 and Li 2S 4 molecules, simulated by first-principles calculations. 1
Figure S3. First-principles calculations for interactions of carbon, MgB 2, and MgO with lithium polysulfides. The optimized coordination of (a) Li 2S 2 adsorbed on the graphitic carbon; Li 2S 4 on (b) B- terminated and (c) Mg-terminated MgB 2 (0001) surfaces; (d) Li 2S and (e) Li 2S 4 on the MgO (110) surface. Figure S4. The Li 2S 4 adsorptivity of MgB 2 measured by electrochemical titration, compared to meso-tio 2, nanostructured Ti 4O 7, Vulcan carbon and Super P carbon. 2
Figure S5. High-resolution XPS spectra of the (a) S 2p and (b) B 1s, (c) Li 1s and Mg 2p 3/2 regions for pristine Li 2S 4, pristine MgB 2, and MgB 2-Li 2S 4. Note that the Li 1s spectrum of Li 2S 4 and the Mg 2p 3/2 spectrum of MgB 2 are jointly plotted as one panel in (c) top panel, for ease of comparison with the MgB 2- Li 2S 4 (note that the Li 1s and Mg 2p 3/2 regions are very close and the data was collected in a single scan). Black circles and solid lines represent the experimental and overall fitted spectra, respectively. Panel (a) shows that upon interaction with MgB 2, the terminal sulfur (S T) in the Li 2S 4 molecule undergoes a positive shift and a new component at~165 ev appears, indicating electron density loss for the sulfur as a consequence of S-B and S-Mg bonding. Correspondingly, in the B 1s spectra (b), the B in MgB 2 undergoes 2- a negative shift, indicating electron density transfer from the S 4 to B. The Li 1s component in (c) remains almost constant after interaction with MgB 2, indicating that Li is not involved in strong bonding with B or Mg. 3
Figure S6. Galvanostatic intermittent titration (GITT) voltage profiles of sulfur cathodes during (a) discharge and (b) charge for the MgB 2-S60 and MgO-S60 cathodes. A protocol of a current pulse at C/20 for 15 min with 30 min of rest was used. The GITT experiment confirms a purely kinetic effect rather than one based on thermodynamics (Figure S3). The equilibrium voltage remains the same at all states of (dis)charge for MgB 2/S and MgO/S electrodes; however, upon applying the current pulse, the voltage penalty for initiating polysulfide reduction/oxidation is higher for the MgO than the MgB 2 electrode. Figure S7. SEM images of (a) G-MgB 2 and the G-MgB 2/S75 composite (showing the absence of sulfur aggregates). 4
Figure S8. Capacity retention of G-MgB 2, pure graphene and MgB 2 based sulfur composites (75 wt% sulfur) with an areal loading of 2.0 mg cm -2 at C/2; the first cycle is at C/20. Figure S9. The cell separators after ten cycles at a fully discharged state for the cells using (a) G/S75 and (b) G-MgB 2/S75 electrodes. The distinct yellow color in the G/S75 cell indicates extensive polysulfide shuttling in the electrolyte which is absent in the G-MgB 2/S75 cell. 5
Figure S10. XRD pattern of the discharged G/S75 electrode, indicating the presence of crystalline Li 2S. Table S1. A list of recently reported transition metal compound based sulfur composites and their electrochemical measurement and performance parameters. Sulfur host [Reference] Sulfur fraction in composite Sulfur loading (mg cm 2 ) Electrolyte/ sulfur ratio (µl mg 1 ) Initial capacity mah/g capacity retention (cycle number) CoS 2+GO [1] 75% 2.9 N/A 1003 (2C) 32% (1000) Co 3S 4 [2] 74.2% 2.0 20 1050 (2C) 78% (200) CNT-Co 3S 4 [3] 70% 3.5 15 1535 (0.2C) 82% (100) MoS 2 [4] 65% 1.5 N/A 1089 (1C) 55% (1000) TiN [5] 58.8% 1.0 N/A 988 (0.5C) 65% (500) Co 4N [6] 73% 2.4-2.8 40 1428 (2C) 48% (800) VN+GO [7] 60% 3.0 31 1241 (0.5C) 81% (200) Binding energy with polysulfide computed ab initio 1.97 ev CoS 2 (111)-Li 2S 4 2.26 ev Co 3S 4(111)- Li 2S 4 3.75 ev VN (200)-Li 2S 6 Ti 3C 2T x+c [8] 72.8% 2.0 20 1226 (0.5C) 56% (300) 6
References 1. Yuan, Z. et al. (2016) Powering Lithium Sulfur Battery Performance by Propelling Polysulfide Redox at Sulfiphilic Hosts. Nano Lett 16, 519 527. 2. Pu, J. et al. (2017) Multifunctional Co 3S 4@sulfur nanotubes for enhanced lithium-sulfur battery performance. Nano Energy, 37, 7-14. 3. Chen, T. et al. (2017) Self-Templated Formation of Interlaced Carbon Nanotubes Threaded Hollow Co 3S 4 Nanoboxes for High-Rate and Heat-Resistant Lithium Sulfur Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 12710 12715. 4. Tang, W. et al. (2017) In Situ Observation and Electrochemical Study of Encapsulated Sulfur Nanoparticles by MoS 2 Flakes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139,10133 10141. 5. Cui, Z. et al. (2016) Mesoporous Titanium Nitride Enabled Highly Stable Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 28, 6926-6931 6. Deng, D. et al. (2017) Co 4N Nanosheet Assembled Mesoporous Sphere as a Matrix for Ultrahigh Sulfur Content Lithium Sulfur Batteries. ACS Nano, 11, 6031 6039. 7. Sun, Z. et al. (2017) Conductive porous vanadium nitride/graphene composite as chemical anchor of polysulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat. Commun. 8, 14627. 8. Bao, W. et al (2016) 3D Metal Carbide@Mesoporous Carbon Hybrid Architecture as a New Polysulfide Reservoir for Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 8746-8756. 7