PR206 NARRATIVE Updated 16 June 2015

Similar documents
PR167 NARRATIVE Updated 25 July 2014

PR122A NARRATIVE Updated 25 July 2014

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

Geomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion

River floodplain regime and stratigraphy. Drs. Nanette C. Kingma.

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

Stream Classification

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

The Equilibrium Channel & Channel Change. Peter Wilcock 3 August 2016

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Streams. Stream Water Flow

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

What is weathering and how does it change Earth s surface? Answer the question using

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

27. Running Water I (p ; )

ENVG/SC 10110L-20110L PLANET EARTH LABORATORY. Laboratory #9: Surface Hydrology & Map Scale

RIVERS, GROUNDWATER, AND GLACIERS

Sessom Creek Sand Bar Removal HCP Task 5.4.6

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

Unit 7.2 W.E.D. & Topography Test

Waterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland

High-Gradient Streams

Historical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

LAB-SCALE INVESTIGATION ONBAR FORMATION COORDINATES IN RIVER BASED ON FLOW AND SEDIMENT

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PHASE III REPORT

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Field Trip Number One. By: Pat Dryer. Geography 360

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

GEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip

Fate of historic metal releases from the Coeur d Alene mining district Northern Idaho

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Landscape Development

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Matsqui Bend Erosion

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Figure 1. Map of Feather River Basin in northern California. (A) Region straddles the northwestern Sierra Nevada and Sacramento Valley.

Pat Dryer Half Moon Lake: A True Oxbow Lake? Geography 364 April 1 st, 2007

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

CASE STUDIES. Introduction

Paul E. GramsT, John C. Schmidt. Department of Aquatic, Watershed and Earth Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah , USA

River Sediments. Sediment Types Are Not Randomly Distributed in a River s Sediment

10/27/2014. Surface Processes. Surface Processes. Surface Processes. Surface Processes. Surface Processes

USGS scientists with Venezuelan military liaisons.

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

Mountain Rivers. Gutta cavat lapidem. (Dripping water hollows out a stone) -Ovid, Epistulae Ex Ponto, Book 3, no. 10, 1. 5

If a Woodchuck Could Chuck Wood

Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

LATERAL MIGRATION of ALLUVIAL CHANNELS

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

Appendix E Rosgen Classification

PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. By Brett Lucas

Page 1. Name:

Identifying, Understanding and Addressing Flood-Related Hazards

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 241 TO 235, SACRAMENTO RIVER

Name: Which rock layers appear to be most resistant to weathering? A) A, C, and E B) B and D

GEOMORPHIC CHANGES IN LOWER CACHE CREEK 2012

The Effects of Hydraulic Structures on Streams Prone to Bank Erosion in an Intense Flood Event: A Case Study from Eastern Hokkaido

Colorado River sediment transport 1. Natural sediment supply limitation and the influence of Glen Canyon Dam

MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

COMPARISON OF SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT AND BAR-RESPONSE RESULTS FROM THE 1996 AND 2004 CONTROLLED-FLOOD EXPERIMENTS ON THE COLORADO RIVER IN GRAND CANYON

Wonder as you Wander up the Carding Mill Valley

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

Development and application of demonstration MIKE 21C morphological model for a bend in Mekong River

Discharge. Discharge (Streamflow) is: Q = Velocity (L T -1 ) x Area (L 2 ) Units: L 3 T -1 e.g., m 3 s -1. Velocity. Area

Technical note about the monitoring of hydromorphological restoration/management of the Drava River in Slovenia

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

Squaw Creek. General Information

CE415L Applied Fluid Mechanics Laboratory

Countermeasure Calculations and Design

LIDAR ASSESSMENT OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT RELATED TO THE REMOVAL OF THE MARMOT DAM, SANDY RIVER, OREGON. A Thesis. Presented to. The Graduate Faculty

HW #2 Landscape Travel from A to B 12,

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

SEARCHING FOR SEDIMENT SOURCES IN SPRING CREEK

4. The map below shows a meandering stream. Points A, B, C, and D represent locations along the stream bottom.

Regaining sediments: the Orba River lower reach bank erosions (NW Italy)

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

The Hydrologic Cycle STREAM SYSTEMS. Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. The Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle

Transcription:

PR206 NARRATIVE Updated 16 June 2015 Cross section PR206 was established in 1977 in a fairly straight reach of Powder River about a kilometer downriver of the Highway 212 bridge at Broadus. The section was placed directly below the recently constructed overhead cableway that was part of the measurement infrastructure of the gaging station, Powder River at Broadus MT (USGS site number 06324710). The section was regularly resurveyed every year or two through 1998. No surveys were then made until 2014, which left a 16-year gap in the measurement record. During the flood of 1978, the river channel was both widened and deepened at cross section PR206. In fact, flood-related deepening was greater in section PR206 than in any of the 18 other cross sections we were able to survey before and after the flood probably because of the upriver migration of a headcut that had first formed about a mile downriver when a large meander was cut off in 1975 (Meade and Moody, 2013, pages 8-9). For more than a decade following the 1978 flood, the principal change to cross section PR206 was the erosion of the 3-meter-high Moorcroft terrace (Leopold and Miller, 1954) that formed the left bank, which was eroded laterally some 45 meters between 1979 and 1991. Major increments of erosion of the left bank were recorded during the years 1981-82 (6 m), 1983-84 (15 m), 1986 (5 m), 1987 (4 m), 1990 (6 m), and 1991 (8 m). By 1982, the left-bank pylon that held up the cableway had been undermined by erosion and had collapsed into the river. By 1984, the large (2-ton?) concrete block that had served as anchor to the left end of the cable had also been undermined. The uppermost corner of this block was surveyed in 1985 at station +3 at an elevation of 917.6 m above sea level. The block was last observed by us in 1992, at that same station, with its uppermost corner at an elevation near 917.0 m above sea level. For several years (1991-1994), a scour hole, about a meter deeper than the rest of the channel bottom in section PR206, developed around the block, between stations -2 and +6. The block was buried under at least a meter and a half of new sand during the high-water of 1995, and, as of 2014, it lies buried under about 2 m of accumulated sand. The high-water episode of 1995 began a couple decades of rightward shift of the channel at cross section PR206. During that year, a 10-15-m width of 1.0-1.5-m thick floodplain was removed from the right side of the channel, while a meter-or-more s thickness of new sand was deposited onto the top of a 35-40-m width of the left-side floodplain. Another 8-m width of the right-bank floodplain was removed between 1995 and 1998. Massive changes took place in cross section PR206 between 1998 and 2014. Because we made no surveys between these two dates, however, we are able to discuss only the net 16-year change, and we are unable to specify the amounts of erosion and deposition that took place during individual years in response to specific discharges of river water. Erosion of the right bank continued in the forms of removal of a 10-m width of 2-m-thick floodplain and the massive removal of a 50-m width of 3½-m-high Moorcroft terrace. New sand was deposited in these

thicknesses: a few decimeters between stations -35 and +9; half a meter between stations 9 and 23; a meter or slightly more between stations 26 and 55; two to two-and-a-half meters between stations 55 and 90; tapering down from two meters at station 90 to zero at station 130. We presume that the right-side concrete cable anchor that formerly sat atop the Moorcroft terrace between stations 102 and 104 at elevations ~921 m above sea level now lies invisible at some elevation between 917 and 918 m above sea level, covered by at least a meter of newly-deposited sand. To summarize: The terrace-bank-to-terrace-bank width of Powder River at cross section PR206 doubled in less than four decades. First, by lateral erosion of nearly fifty meters of the left bank,. and then by lateral erosion of another fifty meters of the right bank. This may be indicative of the upriver (or downriver?) migration of a meander planform through the section first eroding the left bank and then eroding the right bank. A response perhaps set in motion by the 1975 cutoff of the old meander a mile downriver of section PR206. Leopold, L.B., and Miller, J.P. 1954, A postglacial chronology for some alluvial valleys in Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1261, 90 p. Meade, R.H., and Moody, J.A., 2013, Erosional and depositional changes wrought by the flood of May 1978 in the channels of Powder River, southeastern Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5035, 28 p., 1 plate.

PR206. Top. 19 July 1977. View is upstream. Truck on right bank (left side of photo) is parked several tens of meters upstream of line of section Bottom. 19 July1977. View is downstream. Right-bank pylon and suspended cable car are in the upper right of photo.

PR206. Top. 16 September 1984. View is upstream. Deadman for the left-bank pylon is between stations 4-5, and is in the red circle. Bottom. 16 September 1984. View is downstream. Deadman for the left-bank pylon is between stations 4-5, and is in the red circle. Left terrace bank has been eroded back, since our first survey of 1997, about 24 m 15 m of which was eroded since the survey of 1982.

PR206. Top. 22 August 1986. View is downstream. Deadman for the left-bank pylon is between stations 4-5, and is in the red circle. Bottom. 3 September 1991. View is upstream. On the line of section, left terrace bank (right side of photo) was eroded back 8 m since the previous year (1990) s survey, and a total of about 14 m since the survey of 1989. New sediment (between stations -10 to -25) is about 1 meter thick, and now has cottonwood seedlings.

PR206. Top. 3 September 1991. View is downstream. Photo shows the two ends of the cottonwood life cycle. New seedlings on the recently deposited sandbar, and older cottonwoods cut down by beaver. Bottom. 19 September 1994. View is upstream. J. Moody (~1.9 m tall) is standing on a thin layer (0.1 m or less) of ice-deposited sediment between stations 50 to 60.

PR206. Top. 1 October 1995. View is downstream. J. Moody (~1.9 m tall) and the tripod are on the line of section at the upper right edge of the photo. Bottom. 23 September 1997. View is downstream. The red line shows approximate line of section at bankfull elevation. The prominent curvature shown in this photo was developed during the previous two decades since 1977, at which time this was a mostly straight reach of river.

PR206. Top. 17 July 2014. View is downstream from the right bank. B. Elba (~1.7 m tall) and R. Meade are on the line of section, which goes through the teepee of sticks (inside the red circle) on the left-side point bar. Bottom. 17 July 2014. View is downstream from the point bar on the left side with the teepee of sticks (inside the red circle) on the line of section.

PR206. Top. 17 July 2014. View is of the left bank with downstream to the right. The line of section passes through the gap in the Russian olive trees highlighted by range poles with orange flagging. Bottom. 17 July 2014. View of the right bank. The tripod and B. Elba (sitting on the edge of the bank) are on the line of section. R. Meade (~1.8 m tall) is just upstream from the line of section.