Geotechnical Elements and Models in OpenSees

Similar documents
Geotechnical Elements and Models in OpenSees

Advanced Geotechnical Simulations with OpenSees Framework

UCD CompGeoMech Contributions to OpenSees: Deliverables

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

2005 OpenSees Symposium OpenSees

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Numerical Modeling of Interface Between Soil and Pile to Account for Loss of Contact during Seismic Excitation

2004 OpenSees User Workshop. OpenSees. Geotechnical Capabilities and Applications. (U.C. San Diego) Roadmap

Geotechnical Modeling Issues

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

A Brief Overview of the NEESgrid Simulation Platform OpenSees: Application to the Soil Foundation Structure Interaction Problems

USER S MANUAL. 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example. University of California: San Diego.

Propagation of Seismic Waves through Liquefied Soils

Modelling Seismic Isolation and Viscous Damping

TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL

A MODEL FOR COUPLED DYNAMIC ELASTO-PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF SOILS

Settlement and Bearing Capacity of a Strip Footing. Nonlinear Analyses

Development of Geotechnical Capabilities in OpenSees

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A PILE SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS

Application of cyclic accumulation models for undrained and partially drained general boundary value problems

13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 3016

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

Jeremić et al., DRAFT, work in progress!

INFLUENCE OF SOIL NONLINEARITY AND LIQUEFACTION ON DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF PILE GROUPS

GEO E1050 Finite Element Method Mohr-Coulomb and other constitutive models. Wojciech Sołowski

Modeling of Seismic Energy Dissipation in Elastic-Plastic Materials

Numerical simulation of inclined piles in liquefiable soils

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF LIQUEFACTION-INDUCED UPLIFT FOR AN IMMERSED TUNNEL

Numerical Simulation of the Response of Sandy Soils Treated with PV-drains

Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading

Dynamic Analysis to Study Soil-Pile Interaction Effects

Intro to Soil Mechanics: the what, why & how. José E. Andrade, Caltech

Developing software to evaluate the liquefaction potential by using 2D numerical modeling: Applications.

Technical Specifications

CONSOLIDATION BEHAVIOR OF PILES UNDER PURE LATERAL LOADINGS

BENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

Advanced model for soft soils. Modified Cam-Clay (MCC)

Multiaxial Constitutive and Numerical Modeling in Geo-mechanics within Critical State Theory

Determination of Dynamic p-y Curves for Pile Foundations Under Seismic Loading

Technical Specifications

A Review on Factors affecting Seismic Pile Response Analysis: A Parametric Study

Modeling and Simulation of Static and Dynamic Behavior of Soil Structure Systems

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

ISSUES IN MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC LIQUEFACTION AS A NON-LOCAL INSTABILITY PROBLEM. Ronaldo I. Borja Stanford University ABSTRACT

CAEFEM v9.5 Information

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1.2 The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials

Calculation types: drained, undrained and fully coupled material behavior. Dr Francesca Ceccato

Numerical analysis of pile behaviour under lateral loads in layered elastic plastic soils

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

Modeling and Simulation of Static and Dynamic Behavior of Soil Structure Systems

Bifurcation Analysis in Geomechanics

Numerical Analysis of Pile Behavior under Lateral Loads in. Layered Elastic Plastic Soils

Shakedown analysis of pile foundation with limited plastic deformation. *Majid Movahedi Rad 1)

S Wang Beca Consultants, Wellington, NZ (formerly University of Auckland, NZ)

Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

Analytical and Numerical Investigations on the Vertical Seismic Site Response

A Constitutive Framework for the Numerical Analysis of Organic Soils and Directionally Dependent Materials

Model tests and FE-modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction

NUMERICAL MODELING OF INSTABILITIES IN SAND

Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DAMAGE OF RIVER EMBANKMENT ON SOFT SOIL DEPOSIT DUE TO EARTHQUAKES WITH LONG DURATION TIME

Dynamics: Domain Reduction Method. Case study

Effect of Non-Uniform Gravitational Field on Seismically-Induced Ground Movements in Centrifuge Models Antonios Vytiniotis Andrew J.

DYNAMIC RESPONSE APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

Lecture 7. Pile Analysis

Towards Efficient Finite Element Model Review Dr. Richard Witasse, Plaxis bv (based on the original presentation of Dr.

2D Embankment and Slope Analysis (Numerical)

Numerical Simulation of the Response of Sandy Soils Treated with Prefabricated Vertical Drains

Seismic Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction under Various Soil Conditions

Finite Deformation Analysis of Dynamic Behavior of Embankment on Liquefiable Sand Deposit Considering Pore Water Flow and Migration

Examining the Soil Responses during the Initiation of a Flow Landslide by Coupled Numerical Simulations

Modelling the excavation damaged zone in Callovo-Oxfordian claystone with strain localisation

ABSTRACT. SUAREZ, VINICIO. Implementation of Direct Displacement Based Design for Pile and

Computational Inelasticity FHLN05. Assignment A non-linear elasto-plastic problem

EVALUATION OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS IN LIQUEFIABLE SOILS

Directing Energy Dissipation in Earthquake-Soil-Structure Systems

Research Article Decomposition of Dynamic p-y Curves Considering Liquefaction during Earthquakes

MHA042 - Material mechanics: Duggafrågor

Geomechanics Examples

Dynamics Manual. Version 7

Liquefaction - principles

Shake Table Study of Soil Structure Interaction Effects in Surface and Embedded Foundations

NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF DRILLED PIERS UNDER DYNAMIC AND STATIC AXIAL LOADING ABSTRACT

Dynamic Analyses of an Earthfill Dam on Over-Consolidated Silt with Cyclic Strain Softening

Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading

Theoretical Manual Theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system

Unified Constitutive Model for Engineering- Pavement Materials and Computer Applications. University of Illinois 12 February 2009

A simple elastoplastic model for soils and soft rocks

Applicability of Multi-spring Model Based on Finite Strain Theory to Seismic Behavior of Embankment on Liquefiable Sand Deposit

Piles in Lateral Spreading due to Liquefaction: A Physically Simplified Method Versus Centrifuge Experiments

13 Dewatered Construction of a Braced Excavation

Dynamic effective stress analysis using the finite element approach

Numerical Analysis Differential Methods

The Finite Element Method II

PLAXIS LIQUEFACTION MODEL UBC3D-PLM

Constitutive models: Incremental plasticity Drücker s postulate

Numerical study of group effects for pile groups in sands

Simulating Granular Flow Dynamics and Other Applications using the Material Point Method

FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF RETROGRESSIVE FAILURE OF SUBMARINE SLOPES

Transcription:

Geotechnical Elements and Models in OpenSees Pedro Arduino University of Washington, Seattle OpenSees Days 2008, OpenSees User Workshop, Monday Sept 8, 2008 Type of Geotechnical Problems that can be solved using OpenSees Static Problems Deformation analyses (1D, 2D, or 3D) Consolidation problems Soil-structure interaction problems Shallow foundations (e.g. bearing capacity, deformation) Pile foundations (e.g. vertical and lateral capacity) Dynamic (earthquake problems) Free-field analysis Liquefaction induced problems Soil structure interaction problems (e.g. response of pile foundations, bridge bents, or complete structures embedded in soils to earthquake excitations) 1

What do we need?? Solid elements to characterize the soil domain (continuum). Appropriate boundary conditions to accurately represent the soil domain boundaries. Robust constitutive models to characterize the soil stress-strain response under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions Interface elements to capture the interaction between the soil and adjacent structures. Everything else you are learning in this workshop (i.e., how to create beam elements, apply loads, record results, perform the analysis, etc. Outline Finite Elements (for solids) Single-phase Multi-phase (coupled) finite elements Zero length element Material Models Elastic Elasto-plastic Continuum Models Elasto-plastic Uniaxial models Boundary Conditions Equal DOF Absorbent boundaries 2

Finite Elements (solids) Single-phase formulation To capture the response of dry soils need one single phase Phase 1 soil skeleton Multi-phase formulation To capture the response of saturated soils need two phases Phase 1 Soil skeleton Phase 2 pore water Zero-Length element To capture interface response between solid and beam elements Single Phase Formulations Small deformation solid elements 2-D quadrilateral elements (4, 9 nodes) 3-D solid elements, brick (8, 20 nodes) Large deformation (total Lagrangian) solid elements, bricks (20 nodes) n8 n4 n3 n1 n2 quad (4 node) n5 n1 n4 n2 n6 n7 n3 stdbrick (8 node) 3

quad element definition n4 n3 n1 n2 quad (4 node) element quad $eletag $n1 $n2 $n3 $n4 $thick $type $mattag <$press $rho $b1 $b2> Must define first all the required arguments. In particular: Nodes $n1, $n2, $n3, $n4 and Material type $mattag The arguments in < > are optional Multi-Phase Formulations Fully coupled u-p elements (2D & 3D) Fully coupled u-p-u elements (3D) for small deformations n4 n3 n7 n6 n5 n8 n9 n4 n1 n2 quadup n1 n2 n3 9_4_quadUP Degrees of Freedom (DOFs) are: u solid displacement, on P pore fluid pressures, on U pore fluid displacements, on 4

quadup element definition n4 n3 n1 n2 quadup element quadup $eletag $n1 $n2 $n3 $n4 $thick $type $mattag $bulk $fmass $hperm $vperm <$b1 $b2 $t> $bulk combined undrained bulk modulus B c =B f /n $fmass fluid mass density $hperm & $vperm horiz. And vert. permeability zerolength element Connects two points at the same coordinate n4 n3 n6 n1 solid element n2 n5 beam element zero-length element element zerolength $eletag $n1 $n2 mat $mattag1 $mattag2 -dir $dir1 $dir2 <-orient $x1 $x2 $x3 $yp1 $yp2 $yp3> 5

Material Models Linear Elastic Material model () To characterize the response of the soil (or other continuum) in its elastic regime Elasto-Plastic Material models () To characterize the nonlinear stress-strain response of soils Elasto-plastic Uniaxial models To characterize the interface response between soil and structural elements (uniaxialmaterial). Elastic Small deformation elasticity Linear isotropic Nonlinear isotropic Cross anisotropic Elastic Isotropic Material ElasticIsotropic $mattag $E $v 6

Elasto-Plastic (Small Deformations) J2-Plasticity Material (von Mises) Drucker-Prager Material Template Elasto-Plastic Material (UC Davis) Cam-Clay Material (Berkeley) MutiYield Materials (San Diego) FluidSolidPorous Material(SanDiego) J2Plasticity von-mises type J2Plasticity $mattag $K $G $sig0 $siginf $delta $H σ d σ d-inf σ d-0 Von-Mises Yield Surface Stress-strain curve ε d 7

Template Elasto-Plastic Material Versatile tool to generate multiple types of elasto-plastic materials by combining yield surfaces, plastic potentials and evolution laws Developed by Boris Jeremic at UC Davis http://sokocalo.engr.ucdavis.edu/~jeremic Template Elasto-Plastic Material Template3Dep $mattag $ElmatTag YS $ys PS $ps EPS $eps <-ELS1 $el> <-ELT1 $et> -YS Yield surfaces (von Mises, Drucker Prager, Mohr- Coulomb, Camclay) -PS Plastic potentials (von Mises, Drucker-Prager Mohr- Coulomb, Camclay, Leon) -EPS Initial state of stress -ELS1 Scalar evolution laws for isotropic hardening (linear, nonlinear Camclay) -ELT1 Tensorial evolution laws for Kinematic hardening (linear, nonlinear Armstrong-Frederick) Von-Mises Drucker Prager Mohr-Coulomb Camclay 8

MultiYield Materials Material models based on Multiyield Plasticity (Mroz et al., Prevost et al.) Two types Pressure Independent Multi-yield Pressure Dependent Multiy-ield (captures well the response of liquefiable soils) Material to couple solid &fluid phases Developed by Elgamal et al. at UCSD http://cyclic.ucsd.edu/opensees/ PressureDependentMultiYield PressureDependMultiYield $mattag $nd $rho $refshearmodul $refbulkmodul $frictionang $peakshearstra $refpress $pressdependcoe $PTAng $contrac $dilat1 $dilat2, $liquefac1 $liquefac2 $liquefac3 <$noyieldsurf=20 <$r1 $Gs1 > $e=0.6 $cs1=0.9 $cs2=0.02 $cs3=0.7 $pa=101> 15 parameters!!?? 9

PressureDependentMultiYield PressureDependMultiYield $mattag $nd $rho $refshearmodul $refbulkmodul $frictionang $peakshearstra $refpress $pressdependcoe $PTAng $contrac $dilat1 $dilat2, $liquefac1 $liquefac2 $liquefac3 <$noyieldsurf=20 <$r1 $Gs1 > $e=0.6 $cs1=0.9 $cs2=0.02 $cs3=0.7 $pa=101> PressureDependentMultiYield02 PressureDependMultiYield02 $mattag $nd $rho $refbulkmodul $frictionang $peakshearstra $refpress $pressdepencoe $PTAng $contrac1 $contrac3 $dilat1 $dilat3 <$noyieldsurf=20 <$r1 $Gs1 > $contrac2=5.0 $dilat2=3.0 $liquefac1=1.0 $liquefac2=0.0 $e=0.6 $cs1=0.9 $cs2=0.02 $cs3=0.7 $pa=101> 10

PressureIndependentMultiYield PressureIndependMultiYield $mattag $nd $rho $refshearmodul $refbulkmodul $cohesi $peakshearstra $frictionang $refpress=101 $pressdependcoe=0. <$noyieldsurf=20 <$r1 $Gs1 >> PressureIndependentMultiYield PressureIndependMultiYield $mattag $nd $rho $refshearmodul $refbulkmodul $cohesi $peakshearstra $frictionang $refpress=101 $pressdependcoe=0. <$noyieldsurf=20 <$r1 $Gs1 >> 11

FluidSolidPorousMaterial Couples the response of two phases:fluid and solid developed to simulate the response of saturated porous media FluidSolidPorousMaterial $mattag $nd $soilmattag $combinedbulkmodul $soilmattag the tag of previously defined material $combinedbulkmodul combined undrained bulk modulus, Bc=Bf/n Additional commands for multiyield materials Help perform stage analysis updatematerialstage material $mattag stage $snum $MatTag the tag of previously defined material $snum (0 - elastic, 1-plastic, 2 linear elastic constant f(σ 3 ) ) updateparameter material $mattag refg $newval $MatTag the tag of previously defined material $snewval new parameter value 12

Elasto-plastic Uniaxial models To capture interface response between solid (soil) and beam elements (pile) PyTzQ Uniaxial Materials PySimple1 TzSimple1 QzSimple1 PyLiq1 TzLiq1 uniaxialmaterial PySimple1 uniaxialmaterial PySimple1 mattag $soiltype $pult $Y50 $Cd <$c> $soiltype =1 Matlock (clay), =2 API (sand) $pult ultimate capacity of p-y material $Y50 displ. @ 50% of pult Cd drag resistance (=1 no gap, <1 gap) $c viscous damping Cd=1.0 p pult (Reese 1974) Cd=0.3 y50 (API 1993) y 13

uniaxialmaterial TzSimple1 & QzSimple1 uniaxialmaterial TzSimple1 mattag $tztype $tult $z50 <$c> $tztype =1 Reese & O Neill (clay), =2 Mosher (sand) $tult ultimate capacity of t-z material $z50 displ. @ 50% of tult $c viscous damping uniaxialmaterial QzSimple1 mattag $qztype $qult $z50 <$suction $c> $qztype =1 Reese & O Neill (clay), =2 Vijayvergiya (sand) $qult = ultimate capacity of q-z material $z50 = displ. @ 50% of qult $suction uplift resistance = suction*qult $c viscous damping uniaxialmaterial PyLiq1 uniaxialmaterial PyLiq1 $mattag $soiltype $pult $Y50 $Cd $c $pres $solidelem1 $solidelem2 $soiltype =1 Matlock (clay), =2 API (sand) $pult ultimate capacity of p-y material $Y50 displ. @ 50% of pult Cd drag resistance (=1 no gap, <1 gap) $c viscous damping $pres residual (minimum) p-y resistance as r u =1.0 $solidelem1 & $solidelem2 solid elements from which PyLiq1 will obtain effective stresses and pore pressures 14

uniaxialmaterial PyLiq1 Boundary Conditions EqualDof equaldof $rnodetag $cnodetaga $dof1 $dof2 $rnodetag master node $cnodetag slave node $dof1 $dof2 constrained dof s Same lateral deformation 15

Absorbent Boundaries Lysmer (1969) Quad Element 1. set DampP 755 2. set DampN 1216 3. uniaxialmaterial Elastic 1 0 $DampP 4. uniaxialmaterial Elastic 2 0 $DampN 5. node 1 16.0 0.0 6. node 2 16.0 0.0 7. element zerolength 1 1 2 -mat 1 2 -dir 1 2 orient 1 2 0 2 1 0 C C N P = a ρ V = b ρv zerolength Element & uniaxial material P S Many more capabilities currently under development!! 16