SAN JACINTO RIVER / BAUTISTA CREEK LEVEE SYSTEM RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD ID #

Similar documents
NEEDLES S STREET LEVEE SYSTEM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID #

CCR Rule Annual Inspection Report (cont.) 2

design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the BAP is consistent with recognized and generally accepted good engineering standards.

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Limited Visual Dam Safety Inspections OA Oahu Reservoir No Oahu, Hawaii

Delaware Bay Dikes Repair and Prevention Project Preliminary Design for New Castle Dikes

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

Sacramento River Bank Protection Project

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Local Flood Hazards. Click here for Real-time River Information

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

BRANDON LAKES AVENUE PRE AND POST CONDITIONS DRAINAGE REPORT

Appendix E Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping

TAKING THE MYSTERY OUT OF USACE S ER DRILLING IN EARTH EMBANKMENT DAMS AND LEVEES

PRELIMINARY CULVERT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR CULVERT NO. 008-C OREGON AVENUE OVER PINEHURST CREEK

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

NEWS RELEASE UNDER SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (33 USC 1344) ACTION NUMBER SPA ABQ

Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Tata Pond Dam

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

Lateral Inflow into High-Velocity Channels

CITY OF PERRIS FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 May 12, 2015

Analysis of Hydraulic Impacts on the Schuylkill River

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

CHAPTER FIVE: THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI REGION AND PLAQUEMINES PARISH

MIDDLESEX COUNTY Department of Planning and Community Development P.O. Box 427, Saluda, VA Phone: Fax:

U-Shaped Sediment Traps

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Suitable Applications Sediment traps should be considered for use:

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

JACINTO. Sediment Transport and Scour Analysis San Jacinto River, Stage 4 North and South Levees SAN ENGINEERING STUDY. Prepared for: Prepared by:

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

APPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND. July 18, Alberta Infrastructure & Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

Hydrologic hazards can be considered in three categories; An indication of flooding potential for areas located

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6-0 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT. for SR 3062, SECTION 29S STRASBURG ROAD.

Attachment 3: Fragility Curve Determinations DRAFT

An Evaluation of Pavement Drainage Interstate 64, Rowan-Carter Counties

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

Dam Break Analysis Using HEC-RAS and HEC-GeoRAS A Case Study of Ajwa Reservoir

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Saganashkee Slough - McMahon Woods Section 506 Great Lakes Fishery & Ecosystem Restoration Study

HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE

Borrego Springs Alluvial Fan Active and Inactive Area Mapping, County of San Diego, California. Julianne J. Miller Steve N. Bacon Richard H.

Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions

Crows Landing Naval Base Easement

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

Agenda. INDOT Office of Environmental Services. Describe Results of FHWA QAR. Landscape and Waterway Permitting Unit. Interviews Site Inspections

CITY OF PERRIS FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 April 26, 2011

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Technical Memorandum No RAINFALL

Appendix C Fluvial Flood Hazards

NRCS - THUNDER ROAD #2, TRIBUTARY TO QUILEUTE RIVER CULVERT REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT PLAN CLALLAM COUNTY, WA., WRIA: 20, SITE:

MEMORANDUM. Situation. David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA Ph Fx

PART 4 HURRICANE KATRINA STRIKES NEW ORLEANS AUGUST 2005

2014 San Gabriel Valley Water Forum. October 2, 2014

1.0 INSPECTION ANNUAL INSPECTION, JUNE 29, 2011 CARMACKS COPPER PROJECT, CARMACKS, YUKON. Dear Mr. West-Sells,

Erosion Information Paper Eagle City and Eagle Village, Alaska Current as of January 21, 2008

GEOMORPHIC CHANGES IN LOWER CACHE CREEK 2012

Specifications Whitcomb Elementary School Demolition January 15, 2016

3/8/17. #20 - Landslides: Mitigation and Case Histories. Questions for Thought. Questions for Thought

THE NEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL SPILLWAY AT THE SANFORD DAM BOILING SPRING LAKES, NC. Presentation for The Brunswick County Commissioners April 20, 2015

B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

Rock Sizing for Waterway & Gully Chutes

Rebuilding Flood-Conscious Society

OC Public Works El Niño Storm Preparation 2015

ARMORED DITCH DEGRADATION AND ISSUES WITH EROSION

President s Day Weekend Storm Community Meeting and Workshop April 17, 2017

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

3. MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION

STABILIZATION OF THE H&CT RAILWAY STONE DAM WALTER E. SKIPWITH, PE, JOYCE CRUM, AIA AND JOHN BAUMGARTNER, PE. Introduction.

COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM FLOODS INTRODUCTION

DAM SAFETY PROGRAM DAM INSPECTION REPORT FORM FOR REGULATORY INSPECTION

Third Annual Monitoring Report Tidal Wetland Restoration 159 Long Neck Point Road, Darien, CT NAE

Bank stabilization by redirective structures on the Santa Clara River, Ventura County, CA

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District Interim Feasibility Report EXHIBITS

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GADSDEN ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii)

FRED BURR DAM FEASIBILITY STUDY

Woodford County Erosion Prevention Plan and Permit. Application #

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Red River Levee Panel

NRCS - THUNDER ROAD #3, TRIBUTARY TO QUILEUTE RIVER CULVERT REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT PLAN CLALLAM COUNTY, WA., WRIA: 20, SITE:

Amistad Dam Investigation and Oversight: Karst- Founded Dam on the USA-Mexico Border

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

THE TRINITY RIVER VISION/ GATEWAY PARK / PANTHER ISLAND Flood Control Project Update

Transcription:

SAN JACINTO RIVER / BAUTISTA CREEK LEVEE SYSTEM RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD ID # 3805010019 PERIODIC INSPECTION REPORT NO 1 GENERALIZED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FEBRUARY 2013 FINAL RATING: MINIMALLY ACCEPTABLE FINAL RATING DATE: 5 FEBRUARY 2013 PERIODIC INSPECTION REPORT PREPARED BY: TETRA TECH FOR U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT SUBMITTED: JANUARY 2013 INSPECTED: 10 AUGUST 2010 AND 13 JUNE 2012

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Executive Summary provides an introduction to the periodic inspection, an overview of the system, a summary of the major findings of the periodic inspection, and the overall rating for the system. 1.1 Scope and Purpose of Periodic Inspections The purpose of the San Jacinto River/Bautista Creek Levee System periodic inspection is to identify deficiencies that pose hazards to human life or property. The inspection is intended to identify the issues in order to facilitate future studies and associated repairs, as appropriate. This assessment of the general condition of the levee system is based on available data and visual inspections. Detailed investigation and analysis involving hydrologic design, topographic mapping, subsurface investigations, testing, and detailed computational evaluations is beyond the scope of this levee system inspection. 1.2 System Summary San Jacinto River/Bautista Creek Levee System is located in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, California. This system was built by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and is operated and maintained by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC & WCD). San Jacinto River/Bautista Creek Levee System includes four segments: Bautista Creek Channel, Bautista Creek Levee, San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a, and San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b. The Bautista Creek Channel segment includes the left/west half of the Bautista Creek Channel from Florida Avenue (BCC Station 99+40) to the channel outlet (BCC Station 26+00), a distance of 7,340 feet. Approximately 6,138 feet of channel is trapezoidal, 200 feet of channel transitions between a trapezoidal and rectangular cross-sectional geometry, and 1,002 feet of channel is rectangular. From BCC Station 99+40 to BCC Station 34+98, the channel is lined with reinforced concrete. From BCC Station 34+98 to BCC Station 26+00, the channel is lined with grouted stone revetment. Bautista Creek Channel also includes the earthen landward slope behind the concrete channel and the grouted stone revetment. The Bautista Creek Levee segment includes the setback levee located along Bautista Creek which was originally constructed in 1962 by the USACE (USACE, 1962a). It is setback from the left/west bank of what was Bautista Creek and is an earthen levee faced with ungrouted stone revetment on the riverward slope. Bautista Creek Levee extends from Florida Avenue (Bautista Creek Levee [BCL] Station 94+60) to just downstream of Cedar Avenue (BCL Station 32+48), a distance of 6,212 feet. San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a and San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b are located along the left/west bank San Jacinto River and are earthen levees faced with grouted stone revetment on the riverward slope. San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a extends from the downstream end of Bautista Creek Channel (Station 197+65) to the Meridian Street Channel confluence (Station 128+50), a distance of 6,915 feet. San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b extends downstream from Page 2 of 5

the Meridian Street Channel confluence (Station 128+50) to Olmstead Street (Station 0+80), a distance of 12,770 feet. A location map is shown on Figure 1. 1.3 Summary of Major Deficiencies Found Bautista Creek Levee, San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a, and downstream San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b were inspected on August 10, 2010. Bautista Creek Channel was incorporated into San Jacinto River/Bautista Creek Levee System in May 2012 and was inspected on June 13, 2012. During the inspection of the system, deficiencies were noted for which remedial actions are required. The following main deficiencies were noted during the inspection of Bautista Creek Channel, Bautista Creek Levee, San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a, and Segment 1b. The respective segment is noted for each major deficiency. General Items for All Flood Damage Reduction Segments/Systems o Bautista Creek Channel: The Operation and Maintenance Manual is missing. The District should coordinate with the USACE to obtain a manual prior to the next periodic inspection. Levee Embankment o Bautista Creek Channel, Bautista Creek Levee, San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a, and San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b: Unauthorized encroachments such as material preventing inspection, items inhibiting operations, maintenance and emergency efforts and access, unpermitted side-drain-junction structures and side-drainage structures. o Bautista Creek Levee: Erosion and bank caving were evident, along with loss of access road base material and pavement due to bank caving. o Bautista Creek Levee, San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a, and San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b: Depressions deeper than 6 inches were observed on the landward levee slopes and on the levee crown due to surface water runoff erosion and animal burrows. o Bautista Creek Channel: The debris shields located at the outlets of the toe drains are missing. In addition, there are no maintenance records which indicate that the subdrainage system has been regularly cleaned. The subdrainage system is part of the channel, but is included here for reporting purposes. Interior Drainage o Bautista Creek Levee and San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b: There is debris blocking more than 10 percent of the opening of a side-drainage structure along Bautista Creek Levee and a side-drainage structure along San Jacinto River Segment 1b. o San Jacinto River Segment 1a: A joint associated with a Reinforced Concrete Box (RCB) is separating. Backfill material behind the RCB wall panel is being lost through the joint. Joint is no longer watertight. o Bautista Creek Channel, Bautista Creek Levee, San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1a, and San Jacinto River Levee Segment 1b: The condition of the side-drainage structures, sidedrain-junction structures, and diversion structure located during the periodic inspection has Page 3 of 5

not been verified within the past five years using television-camera videotaping or visual inspection methods. Flood Damage Reduction Channel o Bautista Creek Channel: Willows located at the downstream end of Bautista Creek Channel have impaired the channel flow capacity. Removal of the trees is required to re-establish flow capacity. Bautista Creek Channel: An unauthorized Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) side-drain-junction structure was added that could have a negative impact on the overall integrity of the channel. The side-drain-junction structure is not shown on the USACE construction drawings nor was it permitted by the USACE. 1.4 Overall Rating The Levee Safety Officer, Los Angeles District, has determined the overall system rating of San Jacinto River/Bautista Creek Levee System to be Minimally Acceptable. A Minimally Acceptable system rating is defined as: A Minimally Acceptable System is where one or more items are rated as Minimally Acceptable or one or more items are rated as Unacceptable and an engineering determination concludes that the Unacceptable items would not prevent the segment/system from performing as intended during the next flood event. The local sponsor will be notified of the overall rating of the levee system by letter with instructions to correct the Unacceptable rated items as soon as possible, not to exceed two years, and to correct the Minimally Acceptable rated items so that they do not deteriorate further and become Unacceptable. Page 4 of 5

Figure 1. San Jacinto / Bautista Creek Levee System Page 5 of 5