μ gyra parc Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa E. coli gyra E. coli parc gyra parc gyra Escherichia coli E. coli E.

Similar documents
Toronto General Hospital ANTIBIOGRAM Emergency Department January 1, December 31, 2016

INTERPRETATION OF THE GRAM STAIN

Most common dose (mg) 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1. Maximum dose schedule (mg) 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1

Tetracycline Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th November 2009

Nitroxoline Rationale for the NAK clinical breakpoints, version th October 2013

Gentamicin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th February, 2009

ANTIMICROBIAL TESTING. E-Coli K-12 - E-Coli 0157:H7. Salmonella Enterica Servoar Typhimurium LT2 Enterococcus Faecalis

Overview of the major bacterial pathogens The major bacterial pathogens are presented in this table:

Antibiotic Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae

_ + Discriminates aerobic organisms that produce catalase to degrade hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen

Stability. Received for publication 1 August to be fl-lactamase-producing strains.

ENTEROBACTER AEROGENES UNKNOWN BACTERIA FLOW CHART UNKNOWN LAB REPORT, MICROBIOLOGY ENTEROBACTER AEROGENES

Considerations with Antibiotic Therapy PART

Multicenter Comparison of In Vitro Activities of FK-037, Cefepime, Ceftriaxone, Ceftazidime, and Cefuroxime

BIOL 3702L: MICROBIOLOGY LABORATORY SCHEDULE, SUMMER 2015

Validation of EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints against reference broth microdilution

ID Membranes for Microbial Rapid Identification

Sample Date: March 30, 2018 Date Received: March 31, 2018 Date of Report: April 9, 2018 (877) Fax: (877)

2 Salmonella Typhimurium

Why the CDS? The unique advantages of using an Australian antimicrobial susceptibility testing method

AEROBIC BACTERIA GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIA. Tests S. aureus CNST S. saprophyticus Micrococcus species 6

Novel antibiotics from symbiotic peptides

3M Food Safety Technical Bulletin

Product Catalogue 2015 Clinical and Industrial Microbiology

Most common dose (mg) 1 g x 3 1 g x mg -1.0 g x 3 1 g x mg -1 g x mg -1 g x 3

Supporting Information

Gram negative bacilli

cefixime CFIX cefteram pivoxil CFTM-PI ceftriaxone CTRX cefodizime CDZM spectinomycin

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COMPLETION DOCUMENT

Bile Chrysoidin Glycerol Agar with MUG

Pseudomonas putida 5

3M Food Safety Technical Bulletin

System with a Conventional Broth System

NUT-TTC/EMB Code 5541

The Effect of Garlic (Allium sativum) Extract in Suppressing Microbial Growth Isolated from Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media by In Vitro

Comparison of cefotiam and cefazolin activity against Gram-negative bacilli

Taxonomy refers to the classification and organization of organisms based on their scientific names to reflect their

Microbial Taxonomy. Classification of living organisms into groups. A group or level of classification

CLASSIFICATION OF BACTERIA

Product Catalogue 2016 Clinical and Industrial Microbiology

Antimicrobial Activities of Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Comparator Agents against Clinical. Bacteria Isolated from Patients with Cancer.

Evaluation of Media for Selective Isolation of Yeasts from Oral, Rectal, and Burn Wound Specimens

WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH

EUCAST. Linezolid Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th November 2005

Research Article Evaluation of Verigene Blood Culture Test Systems for Rapid Identification of Positive Blood Cultures

EZ-COMP EZ-COMP For Training and Proficiency Testing Product Details

EUCAST Expert Rules Version 3.1. Intrinsic Resistance and Exceptional Phenotypes Tables

Retail Catalog 39th Edition Supplemental Information Individual Microorganisms Price Microorganism Description

COVENANT UNIVERSITY ALPHA SEMESTER TUTORIAL KIT (VOL. 2) 200 LEVEL

Bacteria Outline. 1. Overview. 2. Structural & Functional Features. 3. Taxonomy. 4. Communities

Shape, Arrangement, and Size. Cocci (s., coccus) bacillus (pl., bacilli) 9/21/2013

MICROBIAL BIOCHEMISTRY BIOT 309. Dr. Leslye Johnson Sept. 30, 2012

Microbial Typing by Machine Learned DNA Melt Signatures

INTRODUCTION MATERIALS & METHODS

Transfer of Herb-Resistance Plasmid From Escherichia coli to Staphylococcus aureus Residing in the Human Urinary Tract

Activity of ampicillin in vitro compared with

Resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium to Carbenicillin

Game plan Lecture Lab Prelabs

Domain Bacteria. BIO 220 Microbiology Jackson Community College

CEPHALOSPORIN. Research Laboratories, Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kashima, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532, Japan

Enlargement of WHO Repository Transfusion Relevant Bacteria Reference Strains - Report on experimental preparatory work and study design

Figure Page 117 Microbiology: An Introduction, 10e (Tortora/ Funke/ Case)

Bacterial clasification

C. elegans as an in vivo model to decipher microbial virulence. Centre d Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy

Dial Complete Foaming Antimicrobial Hand Soap

Whole Genome based Phylogeny

Kharkov National Medical University. Head of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology Department Minukhin Valeriy Vladimirivich

Genetic Basis of Variation in Bacteria

Microbiological Testing Summary

The Prokaryotes: Domains Bacteria and Archaea

Indicator Organisms SCI5508

Evolution AP Biology

Trimethoprim R plasmids isolated daring long-term treatment of urinary tract infection with co-trimoxazole

Microbial pollutants in stagnant water in an informal settlement in the Western Cape, South Africa

by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) and Low Level resistance Gunnar Kahlmeter

In vitro the effect of intestinal normal flora on some pathogenic bacteria.

THE RADIOLYTIC STUDIES OF CEFTRIAXONE IN THE SOLID STATE

Development of Compact Dry SL for Salmonella detection

Reading guide. EUCAST disk diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Version 2.0 May 2012

CLASSIFICATION OF MICROORGANISMS

Efflux Mechanisms of Fluoroquinolones and β-lactams

Reading guide. EUCAST disk diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Mechanical Transmission of Bacteria via Animal. Agents Truefly Species

Supplementary Figures

ydci GTC TGT TTG AAC GCG GGC GAC TGG GCG CGC AAT TAA CGG TGT GTA GGC TGG AGC TGC TTC

Orbital Diagnostics: Rapid antibiotic sensitivity determination. Dr Robert J H Hammond

Evaluation of the efficiency of Mxxxx as a barrier against microrganisms crossing

Rapid Test Methods. Bacteria Presumptive ID Additional Tests for Definitive ID

CATALOGUE OF TEST, CONTROL OR BIOASSAY STRAINS FROM BCCM CULTURE COLLECTIONS

Telithromycin in vitro

Consulting Scientists to the Disinfectant Industry. Test Report. Safe Solutions (Safe4) Ltd Wharton Green House, Bostock Road, Winsford, CW7 3BD

Escherichia coli O26 9

An Inclusivity and Exclusivity Evaluation of the Invisible Sentinel Veriflow Salmonella Species Method for the Detection of Salmonella species

membranes, that is, which could not be plasmolyzed, he placed, organisms with impermeable membranes, that is, capable of 43

Numerical Diagnostic Key for the Identification of Enterobacteriaceae

In vitro Antibacterial Activity of Bougainvillea spectabilis Leaves Extracts

Reading guide. EUCAST disk diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Consulting Scientists to the Disinfectant Industry. Test Report. Sample ref: 16G/027 Date received: 12 July 2016

ANTIBIOTICS seem to have altered considerably the patterns of microbial

The Genetic Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance

Transcription:

gyra parc Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa E. coli μ E. coli gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc μ μ gyra parc Key words Escherichia coli gyra parc Escherichia coli E. coli gyra parc I E. coli E. coli gyra parc E. coli μ gyra parc gyra parc gyra

Table 1. Background of patients Number of patients (%) In patients 13 6.0 Out patients 201 94.0 Pre-medication Sex Age Pre-medication 7 3.3 No pre-medication 207 96.7 Male 103 48.4 Female 111 51.6 20 29 12 5.6 30 39 23 10.7 40 49 13 6.0 50 59 30 14.0 60 69 38 17.7 70 79 54 25.6 80 44 20.5 Total 214 100.0 Table 2. Bacteria isolated from urinary tract infection Gram-negative bacilli Gram-positive cocci Organism Uncomplicated urinary tract infection Complicated urinary tract infection Total Isolates (%) Isolates (%) Isolates (%) Escherichia coli 53 62.4 29 22.5 82 38.3 Klebsiella pneumoniae 4 4.71 8 6.20 12 5.61 Enterobacter, Citrobacter 3 3.53 10 7.75 13 6.07 Proteus mirabilis 1 1.17 2 1.55 3 1.40 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0 0.00 10 7.75 10 4.67 Other Gram-negative bacillus 0 0.00 8 6.20 8 3.73 Subtotal 61 71.8 67 51.9 128 59.8 Enterococcus faecalis 7 8.24 24 18.6 31 14.5 Other Enterococcus 0 0.0 2 1.55 2 0.934 Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) 3 3.53 8 6.20 11 5.14 Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 0 0.0 3 2.33 3 1.40 Other Staphylococcus 8 9.41 10 7.75 18 8.41 Streptococcus spp. 6 7.06 15 11.6 21 9.81 Subtotal 24 28.2 62 48.1 86 40.2 Total 85 100 129 100 214 100 parc E. coli gyra parc II E. coliklebsiella pneumoniae Enterococcus faecalis Enterococcus Staphylococcus E. colie. faecalis K. pneumoniae E. colie. faecalis Pseudomonas aeruginosa K. pneumoniae

Table 3. Susceptibility testing in gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (n 82) Klebsiella pneumoniae (n 12) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n 10) MIC ( g/ml) Susceptibility (%) range 50% 90% Susceptible Resistant SBT/ABPC 0.25 128 4 64 73.2 19.5 PIPC 1128 4 128 71.9 (82.5) 15.9 (15.5) CEZ 1128 2 128 62.1 (85.7) 14.6 (7.4) CMZ 0.5 4 2 4 100.0 (98.2) 0.0 (0.5) CFPM 0.06 32 0.06 8 91.4 4.8 CTRX 0.06128 0.06 2 86.6 9.8 CPFX 0.06 128 0.25 64 64.6 (84.3) 32.9 (15.7) LVFX 0.06 128 0.25 32 64.6 (84.8) 26.8 (12.9) MEPM 0.06 4 0.06 0.125 97.6 (100.0) 2.4 (0.0) IPM 0.06 8 0.125 1 97.6 (100.0) 2.4 (0.0) DRPM 0.06 0.5 0.06 0.25 100.0 0.0 MINO 0.125 64 2 16 82.9 (89.9) 12.2 (5.1) ABK 0.125 64 1 4 97.6 1.2 GM 0.25128 2 16 87.8 12.2 SBT/ABPC 4 64 4 64 66.6 25.0 PIPC 4128 4 128 66.6 (83.0) 33.3 (6.7) CEZ 1128 2 128 75.0 (78.7) 25.0 (19.1) CMZ 1 8 1 4 100.0 (93.6) 0.0 (4.3) CFPM 0.06 4 1 4 100.0 0.0 CTRX 0.06128 0.125 128 66.6 25.0 CPFX 0.06 1 0.125 1 91.7 (89.4) 8.3 (10.6) LVFX 0.06 2 0.125 2 91.7 (91.5) 8.3 (8.5) MEPM 0.06 0.125 0.06 0.06 100.0 (97.9) 0.0 (0.0) IPM 0.5 1 0.5 1 100.0 (95.7) 0.0 (2.1) DRPM 0.06 0.125 0.06 0.06 100.0 0.0 MINO 2 64 4 64 58.3 (83.0) 33.3 (10.6) ABK 0.5 4 1 2 100.0 (97.9) 0.0 (2.1) GM 0.5 64 0.5 2 91.7 (97.9) 8.3 (2.1) PIPC 4128 4 16 90.0 (61.8) 10.0 (18.2) CFPM 1 16 1 8 90.0 0.0 CPFX 0.06 16 0.25 8 80.0 (63.6) 20.0 (34.5) LVFX 0.5 16 1 8 80.0 (58.2) 10.0 (22.7) MEPM 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.5 90.0 (74.5) 10.0 (21.8) IPM 0.125 1 1 1 90.0 (76.4) 10.0 (18.2) ABK 0.5 2 1 2 100.0 (92.7) 0.0 (8.3) GM 1 64 2 4 90.0 (80.0) 10.0 (22.7) P. aeruginosa E. coli K. pneumoniae P. aeruginosa E. coli K. pneumoniae E. coli E. coli K. pneumoniae E. coli E. coli E. coli

Table 4. A comparison of patient background, fluoroquinolone susceptive-strains and resistant-strains Sex Urinary tract infection Age Susceptible (%) Resistant (%) Male 8 15.4% 13 43.3% Female 44 84.6% 17 56.7% Uncomplicated 39 75.0% 14 46.7% Complicated 13 25.0% 16 53.3% 20 39 10 19.2% 7 23.3% 40 59 16 30.8% 6 20.0% 60 79 19 36.5% 12 40.0% 80 7 13.5% 5 16.7% Total 52 100.0% 30 100.0% Cumulative percentage 100% 80% 60% 40% CPFX LVFX 20% 0% 0.06 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 MIC ( g/ml) Fig. 1. Sensitivity distribution of clinical isolates of Escherichia coli to CPFX and LVFX. Table 5.Substitutions identified in the gyra and parc containing QRDRs in clinical isolates of E. coli Mutation points Amino acid substitution gyra parc Isolates 0 None 8 1 S83L 13 1 S80I 1 Subtotal 14 3 S83L D87N S80I 6 3 S83L D87G S80I 1 3 S83L S80I E84V 1 3 S83L S80I E84G 1 Subtotal 9 4 S83L D87N S80I E84V 12 4 S83L D87N S80I E84G 2 4 S83L D87N S80I E84K 1 Subtotal 15 Total 46 E. coli E. coli μ μ μ μ μ μ gyra parc gyra parc

Table 6. MICs and numbers of substitutions identified in the gyra and parc genes MIC ( g/ml) 0.0625 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 CPFX LVFX gyra substitution 0 2 5 4 0 1 0 3 2 10 4 6 parc substitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 10 5 6 0 point substitution 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 point substitution 0 2 5 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 point substitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 3 4 point substitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 1 3 Numbers of isolates 0 2 7 8 1 1 0 3 2 11 5 6 gyra substitution 0 0 4 6 1 0 5 4 6 5 3 3 parc substitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 6 5 3 3 0 point substitution 1 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 point substitution 0 0 4 6 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 point substitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 3 1 4 point substitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 3 0 2 Numbers of isolates 1 0 5 11 2 0 5 5 6 5 3 3 gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc μ μ μ III E. coli E. coli E. faecalis P. aeruginosa E. coli K. pneumoniae E. coli E. coli E. coli E. coli

E. coli E. coli E. coli gyra parc gyra parc E. coli gyra μ gyra μ parc μ μ parc μ μ parc μ μ μ μ gyra parc μ gyra parc E. coli gyra nfxa nora nala parc qnr Qnr E. coli gyra parc P. aeruginosa gyra parc E. coli μ gyra parc E. coli Escherichia coli Bacteroides fragilis Escherichia coli

Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosa opr mex mexopr gyra parc Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniaepseudomonas aeruginosa E. coli gyra parc E. coli μ gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc gyra parc μ