NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD

Similar documents
10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

Bending and Shear in Beams

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

Reinforced Concrete Structures

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Assignment 1 - actions

Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Office hours

Concise Eurocode 2 25 February 2010

Eurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Einführung des EC2 in Belgien The introduction of EC2 in Belgium

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

DESIGN OF DOWELS FOR SHEAR TRANSFER AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE CAST AT DIFFERENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY

Seismic Design, Assessment & Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings. fctm. h w, 24d bw, 175mm 8d bl, 4. w 4 (4) 2 cl

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

An Analytical Design Method for Steel-Concrete Hybrid Walls Link Peer-reviewed author version

The European Concrete Platform ASBL, May 2008.

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

9.5 Compression Members

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Standardisation of UHPC in Germany

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Appendix K Design Examples

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

Chapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results

Longitudinal strength standard

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL

Behavior and Modeling of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns

Note on the moment capacity in a Bubble deck joint

THEME IS FIRST OCCURANCE OF YIELDING THE LIMIT?

Module 6. Shear, Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Torsion. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

Reinforced concrete structures II. 4.5 Column Design

spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb

Improving fire resistance of existing concrete slabs by concrete topping

Strengthening of columns with FRP

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS DTF / DTS

Shear at the interface between concrete cast

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

SHEAR CAPACITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS RETROFITTED WITH VERY FLEXIBLE FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER WITH VERY LOW YOUNG S MODULUS

VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Columns

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION TESTS OF BRIDGE COLUMN MODELS DAMAGED DURING 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in


UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CIVILE, EDILE ED AMBIENTALE CORSO DI LAUREA MAGISTRALE IN INGEGNERIA CIVILE

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

Associate Professor. Tel:

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

MODELLING NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE

1 Spread footing: Pole_7 Number: 1

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

Mechanics of Structure

Lap splice length and details of column longitudinal reinforcement at plastic hinge region

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Displacement-based methods EDCE: Civil and Environmental Engineering CIVIL Advanced Earthquake Engineering

Transcription:

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD E mail: tamas.nagy gyorgy@upt.ro Tel: +40 256 403 935 Web: http://www.ct.upt.ro/users/tamasnagygyorgy/index.htm Office: A219

SIMPLE SUPORTED BEAM b = 15 cm h = 30 cm L = 3,30 m l rez = 30 cm P = 7 tones Concrete C20/25 Steel S500 Exposure class XC1 = = = P/2 P/2 L A s =? A sw =? s w =?

Support L calc l rez L calc =

Support L calc l rez L calc = 3.00m

Diagrams: M + V M Ed = V Ed = = = = P/2 P/2 L calc = 3.00m

Diagrams: M + V M Ed = V Ed = = = = P/2 P/2 L calc = 3.00m M Ed V Ed

Diagrams: M + V M Ed = V Ed = = = = P/2 P/2 L calc = 3.00m M Ed V Ed

Diagrams: M + V M Ed = V Ed = = = = 3,5t 3,5t L calc = 3.00m M Ed V Ed

Diagrams: M + V M Ed = V Ed = 35 knm 35 kn = = = 35kN 35kN L calc = 3.00m M Ed 35kNm V Ed 35kN

!!! 112 2 d =??? f cd =??? 100 = = = 35kN 35kN L calc = 3.00m M Ed 35kNm where d = h - d s d s = c nom + s /2 s = 14 25 mm for beams 6 14 mm for slabs V Ed 35kN

d = h - d s d s = c nom + s /2 s = 14 25 mm for beams 6 14 mm for slabs long d s C nom,long etr C nom,etr Δ = 5mm for slabs (A.N.) = 10 mm rest of the elements (A.N.)

Δ, ;, ; 10 bond durability

Δ, ;, ; 10 bond,

Δ, ;, ; 10 bond, where = 14 25 mm for beams 6 14 mm for slabs 20 mm longitudinal 8 mm transversal

Δ, ;, ; 10 durability

Δ, ;, ; 10 durability

Δ, ;, ; 10 durability,

LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT Δ TRANSVERSAL REINF. (stirrup), ;, ; 10 20 ; 10 ; 10, 20 mm Δ 10 (A.N.),,, 22, 22, 20 8 ; 10 ; 10, 10 mm Δ 10 (A.N.),,, 28, 28, 30, OK!!!,,

2 d = h d s d s = c nom + s /2 s =20 mm d s = c nom + s /2 =

2 d = h d s d s = c nom + s /2 s =20 mm d s = c nom + s /2 = 40 mm d = h d s =

2 d = h d s d s = c nom + s /2 s =20 mm d s = c nom + s /2 = 40 mm d = h d s = 260 mm

2 f cd f ck c

2 f cd f ck = 13,33 N/mm 2 c

2 0.259

2 0.259 0.8 1 0.4 3.5 3.5 1000 / f yd f yk s

2 0.259 0.8 1 0.4 3.5 3.5 1000 / f yd f yk = 435 N/mm 2 s

2 0.259 0.8 1 0.4 3.5 3.5 1000 /

2 0.259 0.8 1 0.4 3.5 3.5 1000 / = 0,617

2 0.259 0.8 1 0.4 = 0,372 3.5 3.5 1000 / = 0,617

2 0.259 0.8 1 0.4 = 0,372 3.5 3.5 1000 / = 0,617

112

112 = 0,306

112 = 0,306 = 365 mm 2 REINFORCEMENT PROPOSAL?

112 = 0,306 = 365 mm 2 2 16 3 14

2 16 d s = c nom + s /2 = d = h d s =, 0,26, 0,0013, 0,04

2 16 = 402 mm 2 d s = c nom + s /2 = 38 mm d = h d s = 262 mm, 0,26 =45mm 2 ok!, 0,0013 =51mm 2 ok!, 0,04 = 1800 mm 2 ok!

1 2 3 4 5,,, 4 2.25 1 2

min 58 2 ; 30 29

2.25 design value of the ultimate bond stress where: η 1 η 2 f ctd is a coefficient related to the quality of the bond condition and the position of the bar during concreting (see Figure 8.2): = 1,0 when good conditions are obtained and = 0,7 for all other cases and for bars in structural elements built with slip forms, unless it can be shown that good bond conditions exist - is related to the bar diameter: = 1,0 for φ 32 mm = (132 φ)/100 for φ > 32 mm f ctk0,05 c

2.25 design value of the ultimate bond stress where: η 1 η 2 f ctd is a coefficient related to the quality of the bond condition and the position of the bar during concreting (see Figure 8.2): = 1,0 when good conditions are obtained and = 0,7 for all other cases and for bars in structural elements built with slip forms, unless it can be shown that good bond conditions exist - is related to the bar diameter: = 1,0 for φ 32 mm = (132 φ)/100 for φ > 32 mm f ctk0,05 c 2,25 N/mm 2 =1,00N/mm 2

, 4 1 2 3 4 5,,

2,25 N/mm 2, 4 =773 mm 1 2 3 4 5,, =773 mm

, max,100 1/3 1 1, 0,18/ 1 200 2 1 0,15 / 0,2

, max,100 1/3 1 1, 0,18/ 0.12 1 200 2 1.877 1 0,15 / 0,2 =0

, max,100 1/3 1 1 0.02 A sl =???

, max,100 1/3 1 1 0.02 A sl =??? - is the area of the tensile reinforcement, which extends (lbd + d) beyond the section considered

, max,100 1/3 1 1 0.02 0.01 A sl = 216 = 402 mm 2 - is the area of the tensile reinforcement, which extends (lbd + d) beyond the section considered

, max,100 1/3 1 1 0,035 3/2 1/2 =,

, max,100 1/3 1 1 0,035 3/2 1/2 = 0.403, 24.03 kn

24.03 kn, max,100 1/3 1 1 15.72 kn 0,035 3/2 1/2 = 0.403, 24.03 kn

, 24.03 35

, 24.03 35 SHEAR REINFORCEMENT IS REQUIRED min, ;,

, 24.03 35 SHEAR REINFORCEMENT IS REQUIRED min, ;,

CAPACITY OF THE COMPRESSED (CONCRETE) CHORD (V Rd,max ), / cw 1 - is a coefficient taking account of the state of the stress in the compression chord cw =1 for RC elements cw >1 for PC elements - is a strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear 1 0,61 250 (A.N.) z 0.9d =

CAPACITY OF THE COMPRESSED (CONCRETE) CHORD (V Rd,max ), / cw 1 - is a coefficient taking account of the state of the stress in the compression chord cw =1 for RC elements cw >1 for PC elements - is a strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear 1 0,61 250 0.552 (A.N.) z 0.9d = 236 mm

CAPACITY OF THE COMPRESSED (CONCRETE) CHORD (V Rd,max ), / Choosing 45 90,

CAPACITY OF THE COMPRESSED (CONCRETE) CHORD (V Rd,max ), / Choosing 45 90, 130.16 kn

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ), Choosing - the cross sectional area of the shear reinforcement or and the spacing of the stirrups 45 90 From condition,

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) Diametre of stirrups are imposed () A sw =na s (n= no shear arms!!!) s (spacing)

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) Diametre of stirrups are imposed () A sw =na s (n= no shear arms!!!) 26? 28? s (spacing)

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) Diametre of stirrups are imposed () A sw =na s (n= no shear arms!!!) s (spacing) 26 56.5 mm 2

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) 0.341 mm Diametre of stirrups are imposed () A sw =na s (n= no shear arms!!!) s (spacing) 26 56.5 mm 2

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) 2656.5 mm 2 Reinforcement ratio for shear reinforcement, 0,08 / >(?),

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) 2656.5 mm 2 Reinforcement ratio for shear reinforcement, 0,08 / 1.439x10 3 0.715x10 3 >(?),

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) 0.341 mm 26 56.5 mm 2 s =

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ) 0.341 mm 26 56.5 mm 2 s = 166 mm

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ), 0,75 1 Choosing s = 150 mm, s,

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ), 0,75 1 197 mm Choosing s = 150 mm, s,

CAPACITY OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT (V Rd,s ), 0,75 1 197 mm Choosing s = 150 mm, 38.65 kn s,

DUCTILITY CONDITION FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT,, For a crack at 45 (ctg = 1) 1 1 0,5

DUCTILITY CONDITION FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT 0,5? <?

DUCTILITY CONDITION FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT 0,5 1.09 N/mm 2 3.68 N/mm 2 OK!

DUCTILITY CONDITION FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT 0,5 1.09 N/mm 2 3.68 N/mm 2 OK!

2 ND VARIANT!!! DESIGN OF LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT AND SHEAR REINFORCEMENT USING STIRRUPS AND INCLINED BARS

2 ND VARIANT = 367 mm 2 s 3 14 = 462 mm2 d s = c nom + s /2 = 38 mm d = h d s = 262 mm

2,25 N/mm 2, 4 =676 mm 1 2 3 4 5,, =676 mm

, max,100 1/3 1 1, 0,18/ 0.12 1 200 2 1.874 1 0,15 / 0,2 =0

, max,100 1/3 1 1 A sl = 214 = 308 mm 2 0.0078 s 0.02

, max,100 1/3 1 1 0,035 3/2 1/2 = 0.401, 22.11 kn

, 22.11 35 SHEAR REINFORCEMENT IS REQUIRED min, ;,

CAPACITY OF THE COMPRESSED (CONCRETE) CHORD (V Rd,max ), 1 cw 1 - is a coefficient taking account of the state of the stress in the compression chord cw =1 for RC elements cw >1 for PC elements - is a strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear 1 0,61 250 0.552 (A.N.) z 0.9d = 236 mm

CAPACITY OF THE COMPRESSED (CONCRETE) CHORD (V Rd,max ), 1 Choosing = 45, 260.32 kn = 45

SHEAR CAPACITY OF ELEMENTS REINFORCED WITH INCLINED BARS, Choosing A sw s - aria of inclined bar distance between inclined bars s = 45 = 45 A sw = 114 = 154 mm 2

SHEAR CAPACITY OF ELEMENTS REINFORCED WITH INCLINED BARS Maximum distance between inclined bars, 0,61 314 mm Choosing s = 300 mm, 74.4 kn

SHEAR CAPACITY OF ELEMENTS REINFORCED WITH INCLINED BARS,, For an inclined bar at 45 and compressed chord of 45 : 0,5 1

SHEAR CAPACITY OF ELEMENTS REINFORCED WITH INCLINED BARS 0,5 1 1.49 N/mm 2 5.20 N/mm 2

SHEAR CAPACITY ALONG THE INCLINED BAR (V Rd,s ) = = = P/2 P/2 L V Ed 5cm 26 cm V Ed V Rd

SHEAR CAPACITY AFTER THE INCLINED BAR (V Rd,s ) Se impune diametrul () etrierului A sw =na s (n= nr ramuri!!!) s (pasul) 26 56.5 mm 2

SHEAR CAPACITY AFTER THE INCLINED BAR (V Rd,s ) = = = P/2 P/2 L V Ed V Ed V Rd CALCUL = IDEM PARTEA 1! V Ed = IDEM

SITUATION WITH DISTRIBUTED LOADS p = 23,33 kn/m, 0,751 197 mm L Imposing 6 /19 cm V Rd V Ed V Ed =27,78kN V Ed,??? s

SITUATION WITH DISTRIBUTED LOADS p = 23,33 kn/m, 0,751 197 mm L Imposing 6 /19 cm V Rd V Ed V ed =27,78kN V Ed,, s 5cm 26 cm