Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Similar documents
Design of AAC floor slabs according to EN 12602

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Bending and Shear in Beams

Assignment 1 - actions

Serviceability Limit States

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

Improving fire resistance of existing concrete slabs by concrete topping

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Reinforced Concrete Structures

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Software Verification

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

Entrance exam Master Course

Software Verification

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

9.5 Compression Members

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Eurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete

10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

Plastic design of continuous beams

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

9-3. Structural response

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection

2. Determine the deflection at C of the beam given in fig below. Use principal of virtual work. W L/2 B A L C

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION TESTS OF BRIDGE COLUMN MODELS DAMAGED DURING 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Static Failure (pg 206)

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX

BE Semester- I ( ) Question Bank (MECHANICS OF SOLIDS)

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Office hours

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009)

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

Serviceability Deflection calculation

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

Structural Analysis I Chapter 4 - Torsion TORSION

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2


O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

ISHIK UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING

Standardisation of UHPC in Germany

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

Transcription:

Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded steel reinforcement with tensile yield strength 500 MPa and ultimate tensile strength 550 MPa. EN 160, table 1 and EN 10080 1. Material properties Dry Density Table 1: Density classes, dry densities in kg/m³ Density 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 class Mean dry density ρ m > 350 400 > 400 450 > 450 500 > 500 550 > 550 600 > 600 650 > 650 700 Compressive strength Table : Compressive strength classes for in MPa Strength class,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 f ck,0,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 EN 160, 4...3 EN 160, 4..4 1.3 Type of element

System and dimensions.1 System Longitudinal section 00 5883 Minimum value for support length component beams floor elements roof elements minimum requirement 60 mm 40 mm 35 mm EN 160, A.11 Recommended values component support material minimum requirement beams masonry 100 mm floor elements roof elements wall elements masonry steel concrete masonry steel concrete wood steel concrete 70 mm 70 mm

L eff l w + 3 1 a1,min + 3 1 a,min 5,85 + 3 0,05 5,883 m The component has to be designed for all load cases also for impacts resulting from transport. The relevant load case for that is the transport with a fork lifter and for the weak axis. Figure 1: Transport situation fork lift truck Assumption for distance forks: b s 1,00 m ( L bs ) (6,00 1,00) L eff,cantilever,50 m. Cross section h 00 mm b 65 mm.3 Concrete cover and effective depth c 1 5 mm c 5 mm Assumption for fire resistance class: REI 60 With a granted diameter of 6 mm the effective depth is: d 00 mm 5 6 17 mm 3

3 Loads Self-weight of element: with 35 kg / m³ steel and 6 M-% % moisture content of, g 5,7 KN/m³ EN 160, 4...4 (1) wind load, w e 0,5 kn/m² (assumption) EN 1991-1-4 Transport weight of element: g t 7,05 kn/m³ EN 160, 4...4 (3) 4 Internal forces Internal forces are determined 65 mm. for a single component with a width of 4.1 Internal forces for characteristic combinations Q d1 Q b q k 1,50 0,655 0,50 0,47 kn/m Load combinations acc. to EN 1990 Qd 1 l V Sd1 eff 0,47 5,883 1,38 kn Qd 1 leff M Sd1 0,47 5,883,03 knm 8 8 4. Internal forces for frequent combinations G d 0 kn/m Q d ψ 1 b q k 0, 0,65 0,50 0,06 kn/m V Sd Q M Sd Q d leff d eff l 8 0,06 5,883 0,18 kn 0,06 5,883 8 0,6 knm ψ 1 0, (see EN 1990, Table A.1.1) 4.3 Internal forces for quasi-permanent combinations G d3 0 kn/m Q d3 ψ b q k 0 0,65,00 0 kn/m ψ 0 (see EN 1990, Table A.1.1) 4

V Sd3 0 kn M Sd3 0 knm 4.4 Internal forces for transport situations G T G b g T 1,35 0,65 7,05 0,0 1,19 kn/m V T T G T L 1,3 1,19,50 3,87 kn cantilever γt GT L 1,3 1,19,50 M T 4,83 knm where T 1,3 (assumption for dynamic coefficient due to manipulationn of components, when indicatedd consideration of national regulations) 5

5 Design 5.1 Material properties Characteristic compressive strength, f ck 3,5 MPa 3500 kn/m² Basic Shear Strength, 0,5 0,063 f τ Rd ck 0,063 3,5 0,5 / 1,73 0,0681 MPa γ c Mean Modulus of Elasticity of slab, E cm 5 (ρ m 150) 1750 N/mm² Characteristic strength of steel, f yk 500 MPa 500 N/mm² EN 160, 4..4 EN160, A.4.1. (A.6) EN 160, 4..7 EN 160, 4.3.1 5. Design for bending Finding equilibrium of stress / strain: 1000 MT γ c 1000 m d α f A d ck c 4,83 1,44 16,4 0,85 3,5 0,65 0,17 0,17 Reading from design table (see Annex A): ε c,74 ε s 10,00 k x 0,16 1000 ϖ 136,8 A s α f γ Ac ϖ ck S γ f c yk 0,65 0,17 136,8 0,85 3,5 1,15 0,699 cm² 1000 1,44 500 chosen: layers with 4 Ø 6,0 mm each (A sl 1,13 cm²) 5.3 Minimum reinforcement f cflm 0,7 3,5 0,945 MPa h A ct b 6,5 10,0 65 cm² EN 160 A.3.4 (A.3) A s,min k A ct f cflm / f yk 0,4 65 0,945 / 500 0,47 cm² A s,min 0,47 cm² < 1,13 cm² 6

5.4 Design for shear force Determination of reinforcement ratio: A ρ l s, exis 1,13 0,0011 < 0,005 ( b d) 6,5 17, Minimum design value of shear force ctk;0,05 V Rd1 0,5 f b w d 0,5 0,10 3500 / 1,73 0,65 0,17 γ c 10,87 kn EN 160, A.4 EN 160, (A.6) Design value of shear force: V Rd1 τ Rd (1 0,83 d) (1 + 40 ρ l ) b w d 68,1 (1 0,83 0,17) (1 + 40 0,0011) 0,65 0,17 7,93 kn Higher value is determinant (critical) : V Rd1 13,05 kn V Rd1 10,87 kn > 3,87 V T Therefore, no shear reinforcement is required. 5.5 Spacing of Longitudinal Bars Centre distance between bars : 50 Ø s l1 700 EN 160, 5..7.. Therefore, we consider the longitudinal bars at a distance of 15 mm centre to centre as per the limits. And the distance of longitudinal bars from the panel surface is supposed to be 15 mm. 7

6 Anchoring of longitudinal reinforcement EN 160, A.10.3 Cross-Sectional View Description reinforcement layout: diameter cross bars: Ø t 5,0 mm distance between longitudinal bars: s t 15 mm distance to bottom side of panel: e c + Ø sl + Ø t / 5 + 6,0 + 5,0 / 33,5 mm Effective length of transverse anchorage bars t t 3 s t / 15 mm > 14 Ø t 70 mm > t t 3 70 mm t 1 t 4 15 mm < 8 Ø t 40 mm > t 1 t 4 15 mm t 1 t 4 s t / 6,5 mm > 8 Ø t 40 mm > t 1 t 4 40 mm t 1 t 4 40 + 15 mm 55 mm > 8 Ø t 40 mm > t 1 t 4 40 mm t t t 1 + t + t 3 + t 4 180 mm Maximum tensile force: F ld,max M T,max / z 4,83 / (0,9 0,17) 31,0 kn F ld,support M T,support / z 0,96 / (0,9 0,17) 6,58 kn 8

Assume 8 transverse cross bars with diameter 5,0 mm for half of the panel and the arrangement is shown below: Figure 1: Reinforcement layout Design value for bearing strength at support (m 1,3; n p 1, transverse compression at support): 1,35 m (e / Øt) α fck f ld,support 1/3 f, ck γ γ c 1,35 1,3 (33,5 / 5,0) 1,44 1/3 0,85 3,5 c, 3,5 1,44 Bond Class B1 6,84 MPa > 5,35 MPa therefore, f ld,support 5,35 MPa Design value for bearing strength at middle of span (m 1,04; n p 1, transverse compression at support): 1,35 m (e / Øt) α fck f ld,field 1/3 f, ck γ γ c 1,35 1,04 (33,5 / 5,0) 1,73 4,55 MPa > 4,45 MPa therefore, f ld,field 4,45 MPa 1/3 0,85 3,5 c, 3,5 1,73 where, α is a reduction coefficient for long term effect on compressive strength of (α 0,85) 9 EN 160, A.3.

Anchorage force capacity (F RA ) per cross bar: F RA,support 0,83 n t Ø t t t f ld,support 0,6 n l F wg / γ s 0,83 1 5,0 180 5,35 0,6 4 0,5 A sl f yk / γ s 4,00 kn < 7,38 kn Welding Strength Class S1 0,60 nl nt F F RA,max min 0,83 φtot tt fld ( nt ); γ S 43,93 kn < 59,01 kn wg As, F RA,support F ld,support and F RA,max F ld,max Figure : Anchorage of tensile forces As we can see from fig. that the anchorage capacity force does exceed the design tensile force at each section of the panel. Therefore, the assumption is satisfied for the required conditions. So, we can use 16 cross bars with Ø 5,0 mm (for whole panel). 10

7 Serviceability Limit States EN 160, A.9.4 Cracking moment, M cr (b h / 6) f cflm (0,65 0,0 / 6) (0,7 0,8 3,5) 3,15 knm EN 160, A.9.4.3 and 4..5 where, f cflm is the flexural strength of ( 0,7 0,8 f ck ) As, M Sd < M cr, therefore, the slab is considered to be uncracked condition. 7.1 Short-term deflection Ratio of the modulus of elasticity of reinforcing steel and : Es 00000 N / mm n 114,3 E 1750 N / mm cm EN 160, (A.4) Moment of area of and reinforcement: 3 b h l c, brutto + n (4 π (ø 1 /) 4 / 4 + 4 π (ø /) 4 / 4) 4167,48 cm 4 1 Both layers of the longitudinal reinforcement can be fully taken into account to determine the moment of inertia. Parts of moment of inertia from consideration of the reinforcement: A s1 A s 1,13 cm As the reinforcement layout is symmetrical the centre of gravity is y s 10,00 cm h I ST b h ( ys ) + n ( As1 ( ys1 ys ) + As ( ys ys ) ) 150 (10,0 10,0) + 114,3 (1,13 (,8 10,0) + 1,13 (17, 10,0) ) 4 13391,1 cm E I E I + I ) 1750 (4167,5 + 13391,) 10 cm ci cm 0,964MNm ( C; BRUTTO st Deflection due to load combination (frequent action combinations): 5 MSd Leff 5 0,0006 5,883 yel 0, 0010m 48 Ecm Ici 48 0,964 Leff y el 0,0010 m 0,10 cm <,35 cm 50 11 8

General note: The limit value for the maximum deflection may be found in a national application document. 7. Long-term deflection No long term effects! 1

Annex A 1000 M 1000 m d Sd1 γ c α fck Ac d α f γ A s Ac ϖ ck S γ c fyk M sd1 d A c A s f ck f yk γ c,ductile γ S bending moment under characteristic combination of loading (respecting transport load situations) effective depth of component cross section of, A c b d cross sectional area of reinforcement characteristic compressive strength of characteristic yield strength of reinforcing steel partial safety factor of for ductile failure partial safety factor for reinforcing steel stainless steel, f yk 35 MPa steel, f yk 500 MPa 13