Hamiltonian flow in phase space and Liouville s theorem (Lecture 5)

Similar documents
Canonical transformations (Lecture 4)

The kinetic equation (Lecture 11)

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

EULER-LAGRANGE TO HAMILTON. The goal of these notes is to give one way of getting from the Euler-Lagrange equations to Hamilton s equations.

Liouville Equation. q s = H p s

Lecture 5. Alexey Boyarsky. October 21, Legendre transformation and the Hamilton equations of motion

for changing independent variables. Most simply for a function f(x) the Legendre transformation f(x) B(s) takes the form B(s) = xs f(x) with s = df

The Accelerator Hamiltonian in a Straight Coordinate System

HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

Homework 4. Goldstein 9.7. Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 (1) P i = F 1. Q i. p i = F 1 (3) q i (5) P i (6)

Physics 106b: Lecture 7 25 January, 2018

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

NIU PHYS 500, Fall 2006 Classical Mechanics Solutions for HW6. Solutions

Hamiltonian Dynamics

1 Hamiltonian formalism

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 6 Apr 1999

Time-Dependent Statistical Mechanics 5. The classical atomic fluid, classical mechanics, and classical equilibrium statistical mechanics

Housekeeping. No announcement HW #7: 3.19

Assignment 8. [η j, η k ] = J jk

III. Kinetic Theory of Gases

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 2

Synchro-Betatron Motion in Circular Accelerators

Euler-Lagrange Cohomology, Discrete Versions and Applications

Symplectic integration. Yichao Jing

Hamiltonian Field Theory

(Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7) p j . (5.1) !q j. " d dt = 0 (5.2) !p j . (5.

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Physics 106a, Caltech 13 November, Lecture 13: Action, Hamilton-Jacobi Theory. Action-Angle Variables

Symplectic maps. James D. Meiss. March 4, 2008

Errata and Additions for Mechanics I 3/20/2012

Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics

Maxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density

Lecture notes on Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism in Accelerator Physics

Computing the Universe, Dynamics IV: Liouville, Boltzmann, Jeans [DRAFT]

Under evolution for a small time δt the area A(t) = q p evolves into an area

M3/4A16. GEOMETRICAL MECHANICS, Part 1

Handout 10. Applications to Solids

HANDOUT #12: THE HAMILTONIAN APPROACH TO MECHANICS

Canonical transformations and exact invariants for time-dependent Hamiltonian systems

Dirac Structures and the Legendre Transformation for Implicit Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Systems

Chapter 1 Symplectic Integrator and Beam Dynamics Simulations

Caltech Ph106 Fall 2001

The Particle-Field Hamiltonian

Low Emittance Machines

Large-scale atmospheric circulation, semi-geostrophic motion and Lagrangian particle methods

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year

Poisson Variables. Robert DeSerio

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Hamiltonian Formulation & Canonical Transformation

Analytical approaches for the. dynamics of charged particle beams

Liouville integrability of Hamiltonian systems and spacetime symmetry

M3/4A16 Assessed Coursework 1 Darryl Holm Due in class Thursday November 6, 2008 #1 Eikonal equation from Fermat s principle

Chapter 1. Principles of Motion in Invariantive Mechanics

8 Symmetries and the Hamiltonian

Lecture Note 12: Dynamics of Open Chains: Lagrangian Formulation

4 Relativistic kinematics

Low Emittance Machines

Boltzmann-Gibbs Preserving Langevin Integrators

Introduction to symplectic integrator methods for solving diverse dynamical equations

Snyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics

Particle physics experiments

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE PC5215 NUMERICAL RECIPES WITH APPLICATIONS. (Semester I: AY ) Time Allowed: 2 Hours

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries

= 0. = q i., q i = E

1 Graded problems. PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 23 rd, 2015 Assignment # 12, Solutions. Problem 1

Three Loose Ends: Edge Focusing; Chromaticity; Beam Rigidity.

15. Hamiltonian Mechanics

On the Hamilton-Jacobi Variational Formulation of the Vlasov Equation

L(q, q) = m 2 q2 V (q) 2 m + V (q)

THE GUTZWILLER TRACE FORMULA TORONTO 1/14 1/17, 2008

University of Utrecht

Lecture 1: Oscillatory motions in the restricted three body problem

Pendulum with a vibrating base

A Symmetric Treatment of Damped Harmonic Oscillator in Extended Phase Space

The Hamiltonian formulation of gauge theories

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 9

The Simple Double Pendulum

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1995

On explicit integration of two non-holonomic problems

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

Classical Mechanics in Hamiltonian Form

Euclidean path integral formalism: from quantum mechanics to quantum field theory

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity

Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor

INC 693, 481 Dynamics System and Modelling: Lagrangian Method III Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto Assistant Professor

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Most Probable Escape Path Method and its Application to Leaky Integrate And Fire Neurons

Outline. Liouville s theorem Canonical coordinates Hamiltonian Symplecticity Symplectic integration Symplectification algorithm

Self-consistent analysis of three dimensional uniformly charged ellipsoid with zero emittance

Mechanics Physics 151

Space Charge Mi-ga-on

ANALYTICAL MECHANICS. LOUIS N. HAND and JANET D. FINCH CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS

Stochastic Behavior of Dissipative Hamiltonian Systems with Limit Cycles

FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

G : Statistical Mechanics

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 4 Nov 2008

Transcription:

Hamiltonian flow in phase space and Liouville s theorem (Lecture 5) January 26, 2016 90/441

Lecture outline We will discuss the Hamiltonian flow in the phase space. This flow represents a time dependent canonical transformation of the Hamiltonian variables. We then discuss conservation of the phase volume in the Hamiltonian flow (Liouville s theorem). 91/441

Hamiltonian flow in phase space We will now take another look at the Hamiltonian motion focusing on its geometrical aspect. Let us assume that for a Hamiltonian H(q i, p i, t), for every set of initial condition pi 0, q0 i from some domain at time t 0 we can solve the equations of motion starting from time t 0 and find the values p i, q i at time t. This gives us a map p i = p i (p 0 i, q 0 i, t 0, t), q i = q i (p 0 i, q 0 i, t 0, t). (5.1) 92/441

Hamiltonian flow in phase space Considering the time t as a variable we will move each point (q i, p i ) along a trajectory in the phase space. A collection of such trajectories with various initial conditions (q 0 i, p0 i ) constitutes a Hamiltonian flow. 93/441

Hamiltonian flow is canonical A remarkable feature of the relations (5.1) is that, for a given t 0 and t, they constitute a canonical transformation from pi 0, q0 i to p i, q i, which is also called a symplectic transfer map. We will prove the canonical properties of this map for one degree of freedom. In this case we can drop the index p i p, q i q, etc. We will also focus only on one of the Poisson brackets, {p, q} q0,p 0 ; the two others can be analyzed in a similar way. 94/441

One degree of freedom In our proof we demonstrate that the time derivative of the Poisson bracket {p, q} q0,p 0 is equal to zero at t = t 0. Since t 0 can be considered as an arbitrary moment of time, this means that the time derivative of the Poisson bracket is identically equal to zero at all times. And the conservation of the Poisson brackets in time means that the map (5.1) remains symplectic for all values of t. Note that at t = t 0 the map (5.1) becomes an identity transformation, p = p 0, q = q 0, and obviously {p, q} q0,p 0 t=t0 = 1. (5.2) 95/441

Proof We only calculate the time derivative of {pq} q0,p 0 ; the other brackets can be analyzed in a similar way. We have d dt {p, q} q 0,p 0 = d ( p q p ) q dt p 0 q 0 q 0 p 0 = q dp q 0 p 0 dt + p dq p 0 q 0 dt q dp p 0 q 0 dt p dq q 0 p 0 dt = q q 0 H p 0 q + p p 0 H q 0 p + q p 0 H q 0 q p q 0 (5.3) H p 0 p. Using the chain rules for calculation of the partial derivatives = p p 0 p 0 p q p 0 q, = p q 0 q 0 p q q 0 q (5.4) it is easy to show that all the terms on the right hand side of (5.3) cancel out and d{p, q} q0,p 0 /dt = 0. 96/441

Symplectic maps In accelerator context we might have a beam diagnostic at one location of the ring, which measures coordinates of a bunched beam when it passes by at time t 0. On the next turn, at time t = t 0 + T, where T is the revolution period in the ring, it measures coordinates again. The relation between the new and the old coordinates for various particles in the beam will be given by the functions (5.1). 97/441

Symplectic maps The different language of symplectic maps is often used in connection with this type of canonical transformation. A linear map M is defined as symplectic if MJ 2n M T = J 2n, (5.5) with J 2 0 0 0 0 J 2 0 0 J 2n =. 0 0.. 0, and J 2 = 0 0 0 J 2 ( 0 1 1 0 ). (5.6) It is clear the determinant of M must be equal to ±1. What is more difficult to see is that only det M = 1 is possible. This is not a sufficient condition except for special case of 1 degree of freedom. 98/441

Symplectic maps Let us consider the transformation Q i = Q i (q k, p k ), P i = P i (q k, p k ), i = 1... n, and change the notation introducing w 2k 1 = q k, w 2k = p k, W 2k 1 = Q k, W 2k = P k, k = 1, 2,... n. For examples, for n = 2 we have w 1 = q 1, w 2 = p 1, w 3 = q 2, w 4 = p 2, and the same set of relations with small letters replaced by the capital ones. A transformation from old to new variables is then given by 2n functions W i = W i (w k ), i, k = 1, 2,... 2n. (5.7) 99/441

Symplectic maps It turns out that the requirement that all possible Poisson brackets satisfy {Q i, Q k } q,p = 0, {P i, P k } q,p = 0, {P k, Q i } q,p = δ ik, (which is equivalent to the requirement for the transformation to be canonical) can be written as MJ 2n M T = J 2n, (5.8) where M is the Jacobian matrix of the transformation (with the elements M i,j = W i / w j ) and the superscript T denotes transposition of a matrix. This must hold true throughout phase space. The transformation can be nonlinear, but locally about any region in phase space it must look like a symplectic linear map. 100/441

Liouville s theorem A general Hamiltonian flow in the phase space conserves several integrals of motion. The most important one is the volume occupied by an ensemble of particles. Conservation of the phase space volume is called the Liouville theorem. The phase space volume is expressed as a 2n-dimensional integral V 1 = dq 1 dq 2... dq n dp 1 dp 2... dp n, (5.9) M 1 where the integration goes over a 2n-dimensional manifold M 1 in the phase space. A canonical transformation maps the manifold onto a different one M 2, and the new volume phase space is V 2 = dq 1 dq 2... dq n dp 1 dp 2... dp n. (5.10) M 2 101/441

Liouville s theorem The ratio of elementary volumes, as is known from the mathematical analysis is equal to the determinant of the Jacobian of the transformation M dq 1 dq 2... dq n dp 1 dp 2... dp n dq 1 dq 2... dq n dp 1 dp 2... dp n Using Eq. (5.5) it is easy to prove that detm = 1. = detm. (5.11) 102/441

Extended canonical transformations It is useful to define an extended Hamiltonian by including not just time but the energy itself as variables, arranged in a pair with time acting as the coordinate and energy (almost) as the conjugate momentum. H ext (q, p, t, p t ) H(q, p, t) + p t (5.12) with p t = H(q, p, t) required as a constraint. Usually we write p t = h; be careful with signs. Now we have the simple constraint H ext = 0. New equations of motion are dt/dt = 1, dh/dt = dh/dt = H/ t. No change. What we get is a more general class of canonical transformations that can explicitly involve time and energy and alter them. Generating functions work the same way, with extra minus signs when h is used instead of p t. 103/441

Interpretation of extended phase space We started with the variational principle to minimize S = t2 t 1 L(q i, q i, t) dt (5.13) A simple co-ordinate change yields τ2 [ S = q i (τ), q i (τ) ] t (τ), t(τ) t (τ) dτ, (5.14) τ 1 L where t dt/dτ and q i dq i /dτ = t dq i /dt = t q i. Now we can treat time t as just another co-ordinate, on an equal footing with the others. This gives us a new Lagrangian with an extra degree of freedom, ( ) L ext (q i, t, q i, t ) = L q i, q i t, t t. (5.15) 104/441

Example: scale change The simplest transformation is to redefine time according to ^t = f T (t). The generating function is F 2 = f T (t)^h. Then ^H ext (p, q, ^t, ^h) = [H(p, q, t) h] df T [ dt = H(p, q, t) df ] T dt ^h. (5.16) This is consistent with the conjugate to ^t being h dt/d ^t, similar to how the Lagrangian changes with a rescaling of time. 105/441

Example: swapping a co-ordinate with time The idea for replacing the independent variable with a co-ordinate is simple. Since time looks like a co-ordinate, it is (up to a sign) the same type of generating function as a swap between x and y: F 2 = xp x + yp y se + tp s (5.17) Transverse co-ordinates are unaffected, but p s = E, e = P s, S = t, T = s (5.18) Call the new (regular phase space) Hamiltonian K, with new extended Hamiltonian K E = K + p s which has to equal 0. We find K by solving H (x, y, s, p x, p y, K (x, y, t, p x, p y, e, s), t) e = 0. (5.19) If H is independent of t, then K does as well. The dynamic equations are e = K/ t = 0, t = K/ e. 106/441

Example: Lorentz transformation The generating function for the Lorentz transformation (ignoring transverse coordinates) is [ ( F 2 (q, t, P, E) = γ Pq Et v Pt Eq )] c 2. (5.20) Here v is the velocity shift, γ = (1 v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2. This yields p = γ(p + Ev/c 2 ), e = γ(e + vp), Q = γ(q vt), T = γ(t vq/c 2 ). (5.21) 107/441