Factors influencing nutrient and sediment retention by riverine wetlands in the Chesapeake watershed Greg Noe, Cliff Hupp, Ed Schenk, Nancy Rybicki

Similar documents
Sediment and nutrient transport and storage along the urban stream corridor

Nutrient and Sediment Cycling and Retention in Urban Floodplain Wetlands

Freshwater-Tidal Gradients: Eco-geomorphology Linkages to Watershed-Estuarine Dynamics

Quantifying and Valuing Floodplain Nutrient and Sediment Retention

Long-Term Patterns of Coastal Response to Changing Land Use and Climate: Examples from the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains

Flow regime, floodplain inundation and floodplain waterbody connectivity at Congaree National Park

Figure 0-18: Dendrogeomorphic analysis of streambank erosion and floodplain deposition (from Noe and others, 2015a)

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

Distinct landscape features with important biologic, hydrologic, geomorphic, and biogeochemical functions.

Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in restored riverine floodplains in intensively managed watersheds

Introduction to the Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Classification System

The Yellow River Initiative: The Birth of a System Approach to Challenges Facing the Everglades of the North

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Wetland and Riparian Mapping: An Overview of the Montana Program

Ms. A. Mormando's Class *

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Landscapes & Hydric Soils Bruce Vasilas University of Delaware

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Mississippi River and Tributaries Project Mississippi River Geomorphology and Potamology Program

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Name: Date: Class: Louisiana: Our History, Our Home Chapter 1: Louisiana s Geography - Section 2: Natural Regions Guided Reading

Connectivity Between the Mangrove Ecotone Region and Florida Bay: Current Understanding in Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes

RALPH SIMMONS STATE FOREST 2016 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBITS

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Defining the Limit of Regulated Areas. C.1 Defining the River or Stream Flood Hazard 138. C.2 Defining the River or Stream Erosion Hazard 139

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

The Role of the Mangrove Ecotone Region in Regulating Nutrient Cycling and Wetland Productivity in South Florida

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Nathaniel Weston. Department of Geography & the Environment Villanova University 30 January 2013 Delaware Estuary Science & Environmental Summit

4.17 Spain. Catalonia

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Evaluation of the two stage ditch as a best management practice. A. Hodaj, L.C. Bowling, C. Raj, I. Chaubey

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Subtidal permanently flooded with tidal water. Irregularly exposed surface exposed by tides less often than daily

Types of Wetlands. Tidal Systems

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Monitoring Headwater Streams for Landscape Response to

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Harrison 1. Identifying Wetlands by GIS Software Submitted July 30, ,470 words By Catherine Harrison University of Virginia

GIS and Coastal Nutrients Luke Cole

Squaw Creek. General Information

New Approaches to Restoring NH s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal

Introduction Fluvial Processes in Small Southeastern Watersheds

Historical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey. Krista Karstensen Mark Drummond

The Effects of Hydraulic Structures on Streams Prone to Bank Erosion in an Intense Flood Event: A Case Study from Eastern Hokkaido

Wisconsin River Floodplain Project: Overview and Plot Metadata

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER

Channel Assessments of Selected Watersheds within TFL 52

Carbon Sequestration Potential from Coastal Wetlands Restoration Sites

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

Surface Water Short Study Guide

Weathering, Erosion, Deposition, and Landscape Development

Water Management and Hydrology of Northeast Shark River Slough from 1940 to 2015

Module 3. Basic Ecological Principles

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply: Advancing the Science of Watershed Analysis

The River Continuum Concept (or not?) Stream Classification

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

San Joaquin River Tributary Sediment Transport and Geomorphology Study

Floods Lecture #21 20

3.1 Regional Physical Setting

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

9 th INTECOL Orlando, Florida June 7, 2012

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

Remote Sensing and Geospatial Application for Wetlands Mapping, Assessment, and Mitigation

Columbia Estuary Province

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Decoupling of sediment sources in large river basins

Coastal Oceanography. Coastal Oceanography. Coastal Waters

Earth Science Chapter 9. Day 6 - Finish Capillary Action Lab - Quiz over Notes - Review Worksheets over Sections 9.2 and 9.3

Climate. Annual Temperature (Last 30 Years) January Temperature. July Temperature. Average Precipitation (Last 30 Years)

Understanding the effects of roads in upland settings on hydrology, geomorphology and water quality

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

Susquehanna River Basin A Research Community Hydrologic Observatory. NSF-Funded Infrastructure Proposal in Support of River Basin Hydrologic Sciences

Belize Country Report Status, Advances, and Needs. Rudolph Williams and Eden Garcia Hydrology Unit/University of Belize 2/18/2009

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix E. River Corridor Delineation Process. VT Agency of Natural Resources. April, E0 - April, 2004

Geomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge.

KEY CONTROLS ON SEDIMENT BUDGETING IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER FROM SOURCE TO SINK

SEARCHING FOR SEDIMENT SOURCES IN SPRING CREEK

Closing the Gap Between Watershed Modeling, Sediment Budgeting, and Stream Restoration

2 Georgia: Its Heritage and Its Promise

Regional Geomorphology

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Transcription:

Factors influencing nutrient and sediment retention by riverine wetlands in the Chesapeake watershed Greg Noe, Cliff Hupp, Ed Schenk, Nancy Rybicki National Research Program, Reston VA U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Funded by USGS Chesapeake Priority Ecosystem Science

Floodplain nutrient and sediment retention Floodplains are last location in watersheds for significant material retention before river loading into coastal waters What are nutrient cycling and sediment deposition rates? What are the controls? What is the percent retention of river loads by floodplains?

Hydrogeomorphic controls in floodplain ecosystems Four dimensions of river corridors influence floodplain ecosystem processes through river-floodplain hydrologic connectivity This heterogeneity is critical to the prediction and scaling of floodplain effects on water quality Noe. 2012. Treatise of Geomorphology. Modified from NRC 2002.

Nutrient trapping in the Coastal Plain nutrients n = 71 sediment n = 114 n = 185 +

Sediment (g m -2 yr -1 ) P (g m -2 yr -1 ) N (g m -2 yr -1 ) 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Net sedimentation rates Urban Forest Agriculture Alluvial Upham Bott Bridge Burkes Cypress Del. Xing Willards Porters Blades Roanoke Chickahominy Mattaponi Pocomoke Roanoke Noe and Hupp 2005, Hupp et al. 2009

Mean annual % retention of river load [(floodplain load trapping / river load)*100%] N P Sediment Mean -90% +90% Mean -90% +90% Mean -90 % +90% Chickahominy 104 49 305 245 121 840 Choptank 5 3 7 14 9 22 85 56 130 Dragon Run 150 85 265 587 333 1035 Mattaponi 56 43 75 66 51 87 476 360 632 Pamunkey 12 8 17 22 15 32 53 35 82 Patuxent 17 14 21 59 47 74 119 94 149 Pocomoke 22 17 30 21 16 27 690 529 911 Noe and Hupp 2009

Does role of floodplains change upstream? Gellis. 2008. USGS SIR 2008-5186.

Difficult Run Floodplain Study measuring sediment and nutrient retention along lateral and longitudinal floodplain gradients in an urban, Piedmont watershed

Difficult Run Floodplain Study measuring sediment and nutrient retention along lateral and longitudinal floodplain gradients in an urban, Piedmont watershed lateral gradients longitudinal gradients

Average budget of floodplains g m -2 yr -1 (average all floodplain plots) N net flux = + 11.43 P net flux = + 2.35 Sediment net flux = + 3984 14.09 2.89 5076 7.08 0.65 2.66 0.54 1092 4.47 0.11

Lateral Time Longitudinal x Time 25 N sedimentation (g m -2 yr -1 ) Time 20 15 10 Annual net mineralization rates 5 0 P turnover (yr -1 ) P mineralization (mmol-p m -2 yr -1 ) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 downstream Levee Backswamp Toe slope 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Site 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 120 100 N turnover (yr -1 ) N mineralization (mmol-n m -2 yr -1 ) Lateral Time Time 80 60 40 % Nitrification Lateral 20 1 2 3 4 5 Site 0

Geomorphic controls on sediment retention and loss 1500 Difficult Run Sediment gain or loss (kg m -1 yr -1 ) 1000 500 0-500 Floodplain Banks Net Site 0 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Hupp et al. in review Log (+200) site sediment budget (kg m -1 yr -1 ) 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 Chesapeake Piedmont Difficult Run Little Conestoga Creek Linganore Creek 1.8 r = -0.783 p < 0.001 1.6-2.0-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0-0.8 Log bank height:floodplain width Schenk et al. in review

Historic mill dams and legacy sediment 2.5 m 41% of mainstem length impounded Plank road Dam locations from FCPA Modeling by Adam Benthem

How to optimize N retention in created wetlands 10 yrs old Kristin Wolf, Ph.D., GMU 7 yrs old 3 yrs old 4 created wetlands LC: disked vs. undisked BR: overflow gradient NF: main pod vs. vernal pool 4 yrs old 2 natural reference wetlands Open, herbaceous Forested

Hydrologic connectivity among and within wetlands Total N sedimentation and ammonification increase with greater HC (Var. water depth, Var. redox, sedimentation) Wolf et al. in review

Geomorphology within wetlands Microtopography increases coupled nitrification and denitrification Wolf et al. 2011. Ecol. Eng.

Created wetland age Older wetlands develop soils conducive to coupled denitrification Wolf et al. 2011. Wetlands.

Regional evaluation of influence of wetland hydrotypes on N and P loads 1) NatureServe GAP/Landfire mapping of wetland types 2) Classification of riverine vs. isolated wetland 3) Classification of hydroperiod 4) Input into NHD+ SPARROW model Hoos et al. in review

Wetland hydrotypes influence N and P river loads Nitrogen NE SE Land delivery to stream long hydroperiod non-riparian wetlands short hydroperiod non-riparian wetlands In-stream loss small streams: (k + width of riparian wetland) * TOT large streams: (width of riparian wetland) * TOT % of wetland area SEGAP_CODE SEGAP_NAME Inundation regime Inundation regime Riverine? 2.97 CES203.304b Atlantic Coastal Plain Nonriverine Swamp and Wet Hardwood Forest - Taxodium/Nyssa Modifier 4 semi-permanent 0 4.54 CES203.384 Southern Coastal Plain Nonriverine Basin Swamp 4 semi-permanent 0 1.13 CES203.384a Southern Coastal Plain Nonriverine Basin Swamp - Okefenokee Taxodium Modifier 4 semi-permanent 0 4.48 CES203.251 Southern Coastal Plain Nonriverine Cypress Dome 4 semi-permanent 0 11.34 CES203.493 Southern Coastal Plain Blackwater River Floodplain Forest 3-4 seasonal to semi-permanent 1 6.51 CES203.247a Atlantic Coastal Plain Blackwater Stream Floodplain Forest - Forest Modifier 3-4 seasonal to semi-permanent 1 4.68 CES203.250 Atlantic Coastal Plain Small Brownwater River Floodplain Forest 3-4 seasonal to semi-permanent 1 8.26 CES203.249 Atlantic Coastal Plain Small Blackwater River Floodplain Forest 3-4 seasonal to semi-permanent 1 2.22 CES203.077 Floridian Highlands Freshwater Marsh 3-4 seasonal to semi-permanent 0 2.43 CES411.381 South Florida Pine Flatwoods 3 seasonal 0 1.72 CES203.304a Atlantic Coastal Plain Nonriverine Swamp and Wet Hardwood Forest - Oak Dominated Modifier 3 seasonal 0 5.70 CES203.267 Atlantic Coastal Plain Peatland Pocosin 3 seasonal 0 7.32 CES203.489a East Gulf Coastal Plain Large River Floodplain Forest - Forest Modifier 2-4 occasional to semi-permanent 1 12.58 CES203.559 East Gulf Coastal Plain Small Stream and River Floodplain Forest 2-3 occasional to seasonal 1 1.68 CES202.706 South-Central Interior Small Stream and Riparian 2 occasional 1 3.72 CES202.323 Southern Piedmont Small Floodplain and Riparian Forest 2 occasional 1 5.51 CES203.501 Southern Coastal Plain Hydric Hammock 2 occasional 1 1.32 CES203.265 Atlantic Coastal Plain Northern Wet Longleaf Pine Savanna and Flatwoods 1 rarely 0 1.51 CES203.375c East Gulf Coastal Plain Near-Coast Pine Flatwoods - Offsite Hardwood Modifier 1 rarely 0 4.63 CES203.375a East Gulf Coastal Plain Near-Coast Pine Flatwoods - Open Understory Modifier 1 rarely 0 Hoos et al. in review

SPARROW sediment model (RF1) Small streams out of Coastal Plain: source Large streams in Coastal Plain: sink

Hydrogeomorphic controls on trapping by riverine wetlands Connectivity, load, and geomorphology Physiographic province Land use Floodplain disconnection Stream-floodplain geomorphology Geomorphic complexity within floodplain Wetland hydrotypes