Space Frequency Coordination Group

Similar documents
A Vision for the Next Generation Deep Space Network

Vicky Chu, Jer Ling, Tom Lin, Joe Fong, Feng-Tai Huang, Guey-Shin Chang. April 15, 2011

DARE Mission and Spacecraft Overview

NASA Plan for Development of Optical Communication for Space Applications

HEOMD Overview March 16, 2015

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

TESTIMONY BEFORE. HOUSE CO1MfITTEE ON SCIENCE AND ASTRONAUTICS SUBCOWITTEE ON SPACE SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS. Dr. John W.

The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

What is scan? Answer key. Space Communications and Navigation Program. Entering the Decade of Light.

China s Chang E Program

System engineering approach toward the problem of required level of in-orbit autonomousoperation of a LEO microsatellite mission

Exploration Carriers UPC-Orion Launch Opportunities for Lunar Missions. presented to The Joint Annual Meeting of LEAG-ICEUM-SRR

Technologies for the InterPlanetary Network

Power Allocation and Coverage for a Relay-Assisted Downlink with Voice Users

The Path to Mars. December Matthew Duggan. Copyright 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1559

The Deep Space Network

Ludwig Combrinck HartRAO 3rd Space Geodesy Workshop 16 March 2009 Matjiesfontein

Technical Verification Satellite STARS for Tethered Space Robot

4.8 Space Research and Exploration. Getting Into Space

Modular Low Earth Orbital-Hub DLR Vision 2025

Telemetry Anomaly Detection System using Machine Learning to Streamline Mission Operations

Eutelsat practice & views on long term sustainability. COPUOS/SCST - LTS Workshop Vienna, 14 February 2013

Low Cost Breakthroughs in Planetary Atmospheres and Interior Structures With Precision-Radio-Equipped Small Spacecraft

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S * Terms and definitions relating to space radiocommunications

Mars Sample Return Mission

The Air Force Association 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

The Spatial Information Corridor Contributes to UNISPACE+50. JIANG HUI Director of Internation Cooperation Department

LOFAR on the Moon: Mission Configuration and Orbit Design

Habitat Concepts for Deep Space Exploration

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Lunar Exploration Requirements and Data Acquisition Architectures

Human Spaceflight Value Study Was the Shuttle a Good Deal?

Comprehensive Open-architecture Solution for Mission Operations Systems

Lunar, L1 and L2 A Communications guide based on the James Webb Space Telescope experience

Dive In What is an advantage of sending unmanned crafts to space?

World Radiocommunication Seminar Coordination between GSO Networks: DT/T examination exercise using GIBC Appendix 8 software

Todd Mosher MicroSat System, Inc 8130 Shaffer Parkway Littleton, CO

CHAPTER 25 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS # DEFINITIONS TERMS. Satellite. 1) A celestial body that orbits around a planet.

Lunar Precursor Robotics Program

Reduction and analysis of one-way laser ranging data from ILRS ground stations to LRO

Asia-Pacific ground-base Optical Satellite Observation System APOSOS

Enabling Access to Arctic Location Based Information - the Arctic SDI

Paper Session II-B - The Mars Environmental Survey (MESUR) Network and Pathfinder Missions

LUNAR EXPLORATION EFFORTS By ISRO Chandrayaan-1 and Beyond

Science planning and operations for Mars Express

Meta-heuristic Solution for Dynamic Association Control in Virtualized Multi-rate WLANs

A Concept of Nanosatellite Small Fleet for Earth Observation

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: Project Diana U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Astronomical Experiments for the Chang E-2 Project

Comparative Study of LEO, MEO & GEO Satellites

A Regional Microsatellite Constellation with Electric Propulsion In Support of Tuscan Agriculture

INSPIRATION results and benefits for the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre

Report on the establishment of UN GGIM: Europe Item 14. 4th session of the Committee of Experts on UN-GGIM

Mini-RF: An Imaging Radar for the Moon. Ben Bussey The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

Delay QoS Provisioning and Optimal Resource Allocation for Wireless Networks

Planetary Radar and Radio Astronomy

A New Mission Concept: The Search for Trace Gases in the Mars Atmosphere

SciBox, a Proven Automated Planning and Commanding System

A Summary of the Galaxy 15 Incident and its Impact on Space Sustainability

Implementation of the Outer Space Treaties in view of Small Satellites

REPORT ON EUMETCAST INCLUDING GEONETCAST

An Astrophysics Mission of Opportunity on the International Space Station

ESA ITT AO/1-5209/07/NL/HE Contract No /07/NL/HE. NOVEL TIME SYNCHRONISATION TECHNIQUES FOR DEEP SPACE PROBES Executive Summary

ESWT 10 Mission Systems Design and Schedule

by Dr. James R. Lesh Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

A SELF-TUNING KALMAN FILTER FOR AUTONOMOUS SPACECRAFT NAVIGATION

FSA report to the CCSDS Management Council Noordwijk, Netherlands, October Federal Space Agency Vladimir Grishin

Trust Degree Based Beamforming for Multi-Antenna Cooperative Communication Systems

Multidisciplinary System Design Optimization for a Distributed Solar Observation Constellation! Ben Corbin and Ted Steiner 1 October 14, 2014

Ground systems in support of space exploration for Ground Systems Architectures Workshop April 3, 2008

Robotic Lunar Exploration Scenario JAXA Plan

Capacity Region of the Two-Way Multi-Antenna Relay Channel with Analog Tx-Rx Beamforming

Imaging the Earth from the Moon FUV Imaging of the Earth s Space Weather. Dr. Larry J. Paxton (office)

A Signal-Space Analysis of Spatial Self-Interference Isolation for Full-Duplex Wireless

SAFETY GUIDED DESIGN OF CREW RETURN VEHICLE IN CONCEPT DESIGN PHASE USING STAMP/STPA

BRITE Nanosatellite Constellation- Four Years of Successful Operations

OTSUKIMI Moon-sighting Satellite Kyushu Institute of Technology. 3 rd Mission Idea Contest UNISEC Global

Space Ultra Long Wavelength Array

UNIT E: SPACE EXPLORATION

Universe. of Space Exploration. Future Space Missions

SPACE EXPLORATION REVIEW

FLEX MISSION: FLORIS Instrument

Colin Bray, OSi CEO. Collaboration to develop a data platform for geospatial and statistical information in Ireland

The European Student Moon Orbiter (ESMO) A Small Mission for Education, Outreach, and Science

Advanced Probes for Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration

AN EXTERNALITY BASED DECENTRALIZED OPTIMAL POWER ALLOCATION SCHEME FOR WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

Swift Mission Requirements Document

L interférence dans les réseaux non filaires

The first telescopes at the lunar outpost will be observing the Sun. Ed DeLuca CfA Heliophysics Subcommittee

APPENDIX 2 OVERVIEW OF THE GLOBAL PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT (GPM) AND THE TROPICAL RAINFALL MEASURING MISSION (TRMM) 2-1

The Navy Precision Optical Interferometer for SSA applications: an update

SINGAPORE SPACE CHALLENGE 2018/19 CHALLENGE STATEMENT

Simulations of ultra-long wavelength interferometers in the Earth orbit and on the lunar surface

Expanding Science with SmallSats/CubeSats

VLBA Astrometry of Planetary Orbiters

Asteroid Sample Return and the Path to Exploration of Near-Earth Space* By Dante S. Lauretta 1

Transcription:

Space Coordination Group THE SFCG Recommendation SFCG 32-2R1 COMMUNICATION FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND SHARING IN THE LUNAR REGION CONSIDERING a. that a regional communication network at the Moon can be expected in the foreseeable future as missions to the lunar region increase in number and variety; b. that frequencies for direct communication between a spacecraft in the lunar region and an earth station are provided in the existing allocations to Space Research Service (SRS); c. that separate frequencies are needed in the lunar region for compatible local communications between a surface vehicle and an orbiter, between surface vehicles, and between orbiters; d. that major criteria for allocating frequencies in the lunar region include RF compatibility, technology availability and performance, mission scenarios, cost, and ability to conduct testing and emergency support from the Earth; e. that the major benefit of an agreed frequency plan for the lunar region enables interoperability and sharing of communications infrastructure and service assets to support individual or joint exploration missions to accomplish complex objectives; f. that envisioned lunar missions will involve complex communications architectures using earth stations that can communicate with near-earth relay satellites, lunar orbiting satellites, and lunar surface elements in view of Earth based space stations; g. that it is envisioned that missions in the lunar region will employ Relay Satellites (LRS) to allow relay communication coverage and to forward data gathered from lunar surface elements to earth stations; h. that it is envisioned that missions in the lunar region by multiple administrations either independently or jointly can occur during the same time period and each mission may employ 14 June, 2016 Page 1 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

many simultaneous communications links with another orbiter, the lunar surface elements, LRS, lunar communications terminals () and earth stations; i. that sufficient frequency separation is required to enable compatible and simultaneous communications for a multiplicity of spacecraft in the lunar region with each other, earth stations, LRS, local lunar based vehicles, a lunar outpost and lunar vehicles transmitting to an earth station; j. that lower frequency provides better SNR performance for a communication link between two vehicles using low gain broad beam antennas, such as between a vehicle in the lunar region and a LRS; k. that higher frequency provides wider bandwidth and higher data throughput performance between two vehicles employing high gain antennas, such as between a large lander and an LRS with accurately pointed antennas; l. that techniques such as self test on board are available to minimize the need for testing with Earth-based signals; NOTING a) that the SFCG has resolved to provide assistance to member agencies in coordinating frequency assignment for lunar and Martian missions (see RES SFCG A26-1); b) that, according to the provisions of the Radio Regulations, testing lunar local link radios with signals transmitted from an earth station is allowed only if it does not interfere with Earth-based radio systems operating in accordance with the Radio Regulations; c) that lunar missions need interoperable relay links to maintain communication with the Earth; d) that passive observations in space need to be protected to the extent provided in the Radio Regulations. RECOGNISING a) that lunar local links must not interfere with the direct communication links between space and the Earth using frequencies provided in the Radio Regulations; b) that multiple frequency bands are needed for missions to meet various communications requirements and satisfy cost, mass and performance objectives. RECOMMENDS 1. that agencies select frequencies from Table 1 for communications in the lunar region according to the specific applicability in Table 2, 14 June, 2016 Page 2 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

2. that testing lunar local links in flight with signals transmitted from an earth station be minimized and non-interfering to the Earth-based radio systems operating under the provisions of the Radio Regulations; 3. that assignment of lunar local link frequencies be coordinated within the SFCG in accordance with RES A 26-1. Table 1: Recommended s for Communications in the Region Link Earth to Orbit 2025-2110 7190-7235 40.0-40.5 Orbit to Earth 2200-2290 8450-8500 25.5-27.0 **37-38 Earth to 2025-2110 7190-7235 to Earth 2200-2290 8450-8500 25.5-27.0 Orbit to 390-405 2025-2110 2483.5-2500 to Orbit 435-450 1610-1626.5 2200-2290 25.5-27 Wireless Network 390-405 410-420 435-450 2.4-2.48 *25.25-25.60 *27.225-27.5 Relay to Relay Cross Link 13.75-14 14.5-15.35 22.55-23.55 25. 6-27.225 **37-38 40-40.5 * 25.25-25.60 and 27.225-27.5 bands subject to SFCG Rec. 15-2R4 **37-38 band subject to SFCG Rec.14-2R5 14 June, 2016 Page 3 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

Table 2: SFCG Baseline Communications Services Requirements Link Type 2025-2110 (E-LO) 2200-2290 (LO-E) Voice/ Commands Voice/Data 72 kbps 256 kbps 7190-7235 (E-LO) Commands/ Ranging Up to 1 1.0 Earth to Orbit (E-LO) and Orbit to Earth (LO-E) 8450-8500 (LO-E) (E-LO) 25.5-27.0 (LO-E) Telemetry/ Ranging (comm & / video /video Up to 10 10 25 Rec. 5-1 R5, up to a maximum bandwidth of 10 RR No. 5.149 applies, taking into account 22.81-22.86 and 23.07-23.12 for RAS 37-38 (LO-E) Relay Satellites Trunk line (downlink) 1200 Rec. 14-2R5, up to a maximum of 500 bandwidth 40-40.5 (E-LO) Relay Satellites Trunk line (uplink) 400 Rec. 14-2R5 14 June, 2016 Page 4 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

Link Type 2025-2110 (E-LS) /2200-2290 (LS-E) Hubs (Hab, Rovers,, Voice/TT&C/ Nav 150 kbps/3 2025-2110 (E-LS) /2200-2290 (LS-E) End nodes (EVA, Science sites, robotic assistants) Voice or health status/tt&c 8 kbps 2.0 to Earth (LS- E) and Earth to (E-LS) 7190-7235 (E-LS) 8450-8500 (LS-E) (E-LS)/25.5-27(LS-E) (E-LS) /25.5-27 (LS-E) s ( Rovers, ( Rovers, hubs (Hab, Rovers, Commands/ Ranging Telemetry, Ranging Voice/TT&C/ data/ video Voice/TT&C/ data/ video Up to 1 Up to 10 25 /100 10 / 25 Rec. 5-1 R5 14 June, 2016 Page 5 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

Link Type 390-405 (LO-LS) Orbiter, Module, Command 1 kbps 435-450 (LS-LO) Orbiter, Module, Data/ Telemetry 8 kbps, 32 kbps, 1 3.0 Orbit to (LO-LS) and to Orbit (LS-LO) 1610-1626.5 (LS-LO) 2025-2110 (LO- LS)/2200-2290 (LS-LO) Rover EVAs hubs (Hab, Hubs (Hab, EVAs, Robotics Assistants Voice/ TT&C Voice/TT&C Voice/health & status 10 kpbs (bidirectional) 10 kpbs (bidirectional) 10 kpbs (bidirectional) 150 kbps (bidirectional) 3 (bidirectional) 8 kbps (bidirectional) 14 June, 2016 Page 6 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

Link Type 3.0 Continued Orbit to (LO-LS) and to Orbit (LS-LO) 2483.5-2500 (LO-LS) (LO-LS) /25.5-27 (LS- LO) (LO-LS) /25.5-27 (LS- LO) Rover- Orbiter EVAs- Orbiter hubs (Hab, - Orbiter hubs (Hab, Voice/TT&C/ data/video Voice / TT&C 10 kbps (bidirectional) 10 kbps (bidirectional) 10 kbps (bidirectional) 200 /400 25/10 14 June, 2016 Page 7 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

Link Type 390-405 Module Telemetry, Data 128 kbps,1 4.0 Communications 410-420 435-450 2.4 2.48 2.4-2.48 2.4 2.48 Module, Module, EVAs Rover - EVAs s Rover Command/Tele metry/data Command (comm & / low rate video (comm & /video (comm & /video Up to 1 1 kbps 3 (max, rate will drop as distance increases) 30 (max) 3 (max) 25.25-25.6 27.225-27.5 Base Station to User Radio to (comm & /video (comm & /video 20 9.5 Rec. 15-2R4 Rec. 15-2R4 Link Type 5.0 Relay to Relay Cross Link 13.75-14 14.5-15.35 LRS LRS User data User data Up to 300 Up to 300 14 June, 2016 Page 8 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1

Acronym List for typical lunar communication elements E EVA Hab Earth Extra Vehicular Activity Habitat Communications Terminal LO LRS LS SRS Orbit Relay Satellites Space Research Service 14 June, 2016 Page 9 of 9 REC SFCG 32-2R1