Design of a Steel I-section for Bending and Shear

Similar documents
Design of a Steel I-section for Bending, Shear and Axial Force

Benchmark Example No. 15. Flexural and Torsional Buckling

Benchmark Example No. 12. Cantilever in Torsion

Shear at the interface between concrete cast

Creep and Shrinkage Calculation of a Rectangular Prestressed Concrete CS

Cylindrical Hole in an Infinite Mohr-Coulomb Medium

A Circular Cavity Embedded in a Full-Plane Under Impulse Pressure

Triaxial Consolidated Undrained (CU) Test

Design of a Rectangular CS for Bending

VERiFiCATiON MANUAL Design Code Benchmarks

9-3. Structural response

A Simplified Method for the Design of Steel Beam-to-column Connections

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

RSTAB. Structural Analysis and Design Dynamic Analysis. Verification Manual. Ing. Software Dlubal Am Zellweg 2 D Tiefenbach

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

GENERAL GEOMETRY LEFT SIDE BEAM RIGHT SIDE BS :2000/AC:2009. Ratio 0.17

Steel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)

A CONNECTION ELEMENT FOR MODELLING END-PLATE CONNECTIONS IN FIRE

= = = 1,000 1,000 1,250. g M0 g M1 g M2 = = = 1,100 1,100 1,250 [ ] 1 0,000 8,000 HE 140 B 0,0. [m] Permanent Permanent Variable Variable Variable

Formulation of Equivalent Steel Section for Partially Encased Composite Column under Concentric Gravity Loading

Influence of the Plastic Hinges Non-Linear Behavior on Bridges Seismic Response

10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

Verification Examples

Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted)

JointsForTekla Ver January

prepared checked approved Date: Date: Date: S. Fahrendholz/R.Geiger Dr.-Ing. Jürgen Bellmann Dr.-Ing.

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2014 Design of fixed beam-to-column connection EN :2005/AC:2009

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Use Hooke s Law (as it applies in the uniaxial direction),

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

CIVIL ENGINEERING

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

IDEA StatiCa Connection

Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6

7 Vlasov torsion theory

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G

Hilti North America Installation Technical Manual Technical Data MI System Version

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

MS Excel Toolkit: Design of steel-concrete composite columns in accordance with EN

Project data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC dome anchor. Material.

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area

Fire resistance assessment of Composite structures

National Exams May 2015

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

Assignment 1 - actions

Clayey sand (SC)

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section

Hilti North America Installation Technical Manual Technical Data MI System Version

SHEAR RESISTANCE BETWEEN CONCRETE-CONCRETE SURFACES

BASE PLATE CONNECTIONS

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF CORNERS IN RC FRAMES USING STRUT-AND-TIE METHOD AND CDP MODEL

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

Effective stress method to be used in beam finite elements to take local instabilities into account

Software Verification

Eurocode 7 from soil mechanics to rock mechanics. Luís Lamas, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal Didier Virely, CEREMA, Toulouse, France

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

Deterministic and stochastic investigation of welded, high strength steel T joint

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS


Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE ROTATION CAPACITY OF BEAM-TO-COLUMN END-PLATE BOLTED JOINT

VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Design-support for MSH sections

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

Software Verification

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

Eurocod 3: Proiectarea structurilor de oţel Partea 4-3: Conducte Anexa Naţională

Software Verification

OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS

Bending and Shear in Beams

Research Collection. Numerical analysis on the fire behaviour of steel plate girders. Conference Paper. ETH Library

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

Transcription:

Benchmark Example No. 13 Design of a Steel I-section for Bending and Shear SOFiSTiK 2018

VERiFiCATiON MANUAL DCE-EN13: Design of a Steel I-section for Bending and Shear VERiFiCATiON MANUAL, Version 2018-7 Software Version: SOFiSTiK 2018 Copyright 2018 by SOFiSTiK AG, Oberschleissheim, Germany. SOFiSTiK AG HQ Oberschleissheim Office Nuremberg Bruckmannring 38 Burgschmietstr. 40 85764 Oberschleissheim 90419 Nuremberg Germany Germany T +49 (0)89 315878-0 T +49 (0)911 39901-0 F +49 (0)89 315878-23 F +49(0)911 397904 info@sofistik.com www.sofistik.com This manual is protected by copyright laws. No part of it may be translated, copied or reproduced, in any form or by any means, without written permission from SOFiSTiK AG. SOFiSTiK reserves the right to modify or to release new editions of this manual. The manual and the program have been thoroughly checked for errors. However, SOFiSTiK does not claim that either one is completely error free. Errors and omissions are corrected as soon as they are detected. The user of the program is solely responsible for the applications. We strongly encourage the user to test the correctness of all calculations at least by random sampling. Front Cover Project: New SOFiSTiK Office, Nuremberg Contractor: WOLFF & MLLER, Stuttgart Architecture: WABE-PLAN ARCHITEKTUR, Stuttgart Structural Engineer: Boll und Partner. Beratende Ingenieure VBI, Stuttgart MEP: GM Planen + Beraten, Griesheim Lead Architect: Gerhard P. Wirth gpwirtharchitekten, Nuremberg Vizualisation: Armin Dariz, BiMOTiON GmbH

Overview Design Code Family(s): EN Design Code(s): EN 1993-1-1 Module(s): AQB, AQUA Input file(s): usage steel.dat 1 Problem Description The problem consists of a steel I- section, as shown in Fig. 1. The cross-section is designed for bending and shear. b t ƒ t r h V y y z Figure 1: Problem Description 2 Reference Solution This example is concerned with the resistance of steel cross-sections for bending and shear. The content of this problem is covered by the following parts of EN 1993-1-1:2005 [1]: Structural steel (Section 3.2 ) Resistance of cross-sections (Section 6.2) 3 Model and Results The I-section, a HEA 200, with properties as defined in Table 1, is to be designed for an ultimate moment and a shear force V y, with respect to EN 1993-1-1:2005 [1]. The calculation steps are presented below and the results are given in Table 2. The utilisation level of allowable plastic forces are calculated and compared to SOFiSTiK results. SOFiSTiK 2018 Benchmark No. 13 3

Table 1: Model Properties Material Properties Geometric Properties Loading S 235 HEA 200 V y = 200 or 300 kn b = 20.0 cm = 20 knm h = 19.0 cm t ƒ = 1.0 cm, t = 0.65 cm r = 1.8 cm Table 2: Results Case Result SOF. (EC3 Tables) SOF. (FEM) Ref. V p,rd,y [kn] 542.71 611.85 542.71 V p,rd,z [kn] 245.32 228.38 245.32 Util. level V y 0.369 0.326 0.369 Util. level 0.418 0.418 0.418 Util. level V y 0.553 0.490 0.553 Util. level 0.422 0.417 0.422 4 Benchmark No. 13 SOFiSTiK 2018

4 Design Process 1 Material: Structural Steel S 235 ƒ y = 235 N/mm 2 Tab. 3.1 : Nominal values of yield strength ƒ y and ultimate tensile strength ƒ for hot rolled structural steel. Cross-sectional properties: W p,y = 429.5 cm 3 Plastic section modulus of HEA 200 w.r.t. y and z axis W p,z = 203.8 cm 3 Where the shear force is present allowance should be made for its effect on the moment resistance. This effect may be neglected, where the shear force is less than half the plastic shear resistance. 6.2.8: Bending and shear V Ed 0.5 V p,rd 6.2.8 (2) V p,rd = A V ƒ y / 3 γ M0 A Vy = 2 A ƒ nge (in the y direction only contribution the two flanges ) A Vy = 2 t ƒ b = 2 1 20 = 40 cm 2 A Vz = A 2 b t ƒ + (t + 2 r) t ƒ but not less than η h t 6.2.6 (2): Eq. 6.18: V p,rd the design plastic shear resistance A V the shear area w.r.t. y and z axis, respectively A Vz = 53.8 2 20 1 + (0.65 + 2 1.8) 1 6.2.6 (3): The shear area A V may be taken as follows for rolled I-sections with load parallel to the web h = h 2 t ƒ = 17 cm A Vz = 18.08 cm 2 > 1 17 0.65 = 11.05 40 23.5 / 3 V p,rd,y = 1.00 = 542.70 kn 18.08 23.5 / 3 V p,rd,z = 1.00 = 245.30 kn 6.2.6 (3): η may be conservatively taken equal to 1.0 6.1 (1): Partial factor γ M0 = 1.00 is recommended a) Finite Element Method: Case : According to FEM analysis: V p,rd,y = 611.85 kn V p,rd,z = 228.38 kn we have: V Ed = V y = 200 kn, = 20 knm 1 The sections mentioned in the margins refer to EN 1993-1-1:2005 [1] unless otherwise specified. SOFiSTiK 2018 Benchmark No. 13 5

V Ed = 200 = 0.3268 < 0.5 V p,rd,y 611.85 6.2.8 (5): Eq. 6.30: The reduced design plastic resistance moment (for ρ = 0) no reduction of moment resistance due to shear,v,rd = W p,z ƒ y 203.8 23.5 = = 4789 kncm = 47.89 knm γ M0 1 = 20,V,Rd 47.89 = 0.418 Case : V Ed = V y = 300 kn, = 20 knm V Ed = 300 = 0.490 < 0.5 V p,rd,y 611.85 no reduction of moment resistance due to shear,v,rd = W p,z ƒ y γ M0,V,Rd = 47.89kNm = 20,V,Rd 47.89 = 0.418 b) EC3 Tables: V p,rd,y = 542.71 kn V p,rd,z = 245.32 kn Case : V Ed = V y = 200 kn, = 20 knm V Ed = 200 = 0.368 < 0.5 V p,rd,y 542.71 6.2.8 (5): Eq. 6.30: The reduced design plastic resistance moment (for ρ = 0) no reduction of moment resistance due to shear,v,rd = W p,z ƒ y 203.8 23.5 = = 4789 kncm = 47.89 knm γ M0 1 = 20,V,Rd 47.89 = 0.418 Case : V Ed = V y = 300 kn, = 20 knm V Ed = 300 = 0.552 > 0.5 V p,rd,y 542.71 6.2.8 (3): The reduced moment resistance should be taken as the design re- reduction of moment resistance due to shear sistance of the cross-section, calculated using a reduced yield strength (1 ρ) ƒ y for the shear area 6 Benchmark No. 13 SOFiSTiK 2018

2 VEd ρ = 1 V p,rd,y 2 300 = 542.71 1 = 0.011143 2 2,V,Rd = (1 ρ) Wp,z ƒ y γ M0,V,Rd = (1 0.0111435) 47.89 = 47.35 knm = 20,V,Rd 47.356 = 0.4223 SOFiSTiK 2018 Benchmark No. 13 7

5 Conclusion This example shows the calculation of the resistance of steel cross-section for bending and shear. It has been shown that the results are reproduced with excellent accuracy. y V y V y z a) FEM Analysis (SOFiSTiK) a) Reference Figure 2: Visualisation of areas and approach for calculating the V p,rd,y V z V z y z a) FEM Analysis (SOFiSTiK) a) Reference Figure 3: Visualisation of areas and approach for calculating the V p,rd,z By using FEM analysis the V p,rd,y and V p,rd,z values are deviating from the reference values. The reason behind this difference is shown in Fig. 2, 3, 4 and 5. FEM analysis represents a real physical behaviour, because as shown in Fig. 2 and 3 the calculated area is taken approximately for the reference V p,rd,y and V p,rd,z values. The results by using FEM analysis are more accurate in reality than the reference example. 8 Benchmark No. 13 SOFiSTiK 2018

SOFiSTiK AG * Bruckmannring 38 * 85764 Oberschleißheim SOFiSTiK 2018 WINGRAF - GRAPHICS FOR FINITE ELEMENTS (V 19.00) SOFiSTiK AG * Bruckmannring 38 * 85764 Oberschleißheim Page 1 SOFiSTiK 2018 WINGRAF - GRAPHICS FOR FINITE ELEMENTS 2016-06-03 (V 19.00) Page 1 2016-06-03 0.375 0.366 0.356 0.347 0.337 0.328 0.319 0.309 0.300 SOFiSTiK AG - www.sofistik.de 0.291 0.281 0.272 0.262 0.253 0.244 0.234 0.225 0.216 0.206 0.197 0.187 0.178 0.169 0.159 0.150 0.141 0.131 0.122 0.112 0.103 0.094 0.05 0.00-0.05 0.05 0.00-0.05 0.084 0.075 0.066 0.056 0.047 0.037 0.028 0.019 0.009 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00-0.05-0.10-0.15 m 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00-0.05-0.10 0.000 Y X Z Figure 4: V p,rd,y - SOFiSTiK Results (FEM) Shear stress of the Cross section in Element, Loadcase 2 Vy = 1.0, 1 cm 3D = 0.866 MPa (Max=0.377) Shear stress of the Cross section from middle of element, Loadcase M 21 Vy : 1.23 = 1.0, from 1.6442e-04 to 0.375 step 0.0094 MPa Y X Z M 1 : 1.23 m SOFiSTiK AG * Bruckmannring 38 * 85764 Oberschleißheim SOFiSTiK 2018 WINGRAF - GRAPHICS FOR FINITE ELEMENTS (V 19.00) SOFiSTiK AG * Bruckmannring 38 * 85764 Oberschleißheim Page 1 SOFiSTiK 2018 WINGRAF - GRAPHICS FOR FINITE ELEMENTS 2016-06-03 (V 19.00) Page 1 2016-06-03 0.895 0.870 0.848 0.825 0.803 0.781 0.759 0.736 0.714 SOFiSTiK AG - www.sofistik.de 0.692 0.669 0.647 0.625 0.602 0.580 0.558 0.535 0.513 0.491 0.469 0.446 0.424 0.402 0.379 0.357 0.335 0.312 0.290 0.268 0.245 0.223 0.05 0.00-0.05 0.05 0.00-0.05 0.201 0.178 0.156 0.134 0.112 0.089 0.067 0.045 0.022 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 m -0.05 0.15-0.10 0.10-0.15 0.05 0.00-0.05-0.10 0.002 Y X Z Figure 5: V p,rd,z - SOFiSTiK Results (FEM) Shear stress of the Cross section in Element, Loadcase 3 Vz = 1.0, 1 cm 3D = 2.16 MPa (Max=0.895) Shear stress of the Cross section from middle of element, Loadcase M 3 Vz 1 : = 1.23 1.0, from 0.0024 to 0.895 step 0.0223 MPa Y X Z M 1 : 1.23 m 6 Literature [1] EN 1993-1-1: Eurocode 3: Design of concrete structures, Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN. 2005. [2] Schneider. Bautabellen für Ingenieure. 21th. Bundesanzeiger Verlag, 2014. SOFiSTiK 2018 Benchmark No. 13 9