Calapooia Basin RBA Snorkel Survey Brief. Surveys conducted by Bio-Surveys, LLC. (Steve Trask and Conrad Gowell)

Similar documents
Columbia Estuary Province

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

Evaluation of Geomorphic Effects of Removal of Marmot and Little Sandy Dams and Potential Impacts on Anadromous Salmonids

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

The Effects of Geomorphology and Watershed Land Use on Spawning Habitat

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

Executive Summary. Water Quantity

Upper Manistee River Instream Fish Habitat Assessment

Addressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

APPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS. Quantico Creek Watershed Assessment April 2011

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Restoring the Napa River:

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Final Report for the Green Valley Creek Winter Refugia Enhancement Project Monitoring December 2016

Blue Mountain Province

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Ecosystem response during the removal of the Elwha River Dams

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

-- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island

Channel and Fish Response to the. East Fork Hooper Creek Culvert Removal

Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans

Start of Presentation: No notes (Introductory Slide 1) 1) Salmonid Habitat Intrinsic Potential (IP) models are a type of habitat potential

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT RESTORATION MONITORING STREAM HABITAT REPORT. Peggy Kavanagh, Trevan Cornwell TOLEDO SOUTH Coast Range Lora Tennant

Little Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

Russian River Independent Science Review Panel

Appendix G. Meso-Habitat Surveys. DRAFT Annual Technical Report

Modeling Fish Assemblages in Stream Networks Representation of Stream Network Introduction habitat attributes Criteria for Success

Appendix 10. Habitat Suitability Criteria. Prepared by: Rushing Rivers Institute

RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Assignment 1. Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Phase I System Characterization: Year 2 Study Plans

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

7. Management Plan. Terrestrial Habitats. Research, Monitoring and Evaluation

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

The River Continuum Concept (or not?) Stream Classification

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

L OWER N OOKSACK R IVER P ROJECT: A LTERNATIVES A NALYSIS A PPENDIX A: H YDRAULIC M ODELING. PREPARED BY: LandC, etc, LLC

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Appendix F Channel Grade Control Structures

Environmental Value. Low Moderate High

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT

1 INTRODUCTION AND MAJOR FINDINGS... 1

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Design and Construction

Appendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT

APPENDIX 3B OCCURRENCE OF SIGNIFICANT RIVER ALLUVIUM AQUIFERS IN THE PLATEAU REGION

Channel Assessments of Selected Watersheds within TFL 52

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

May Creek Canyon LWD Stream Restoration Project. Helicopter Placement of LWD in an Urban Stream. By Kathryn Neal, P.E.

Appendix I: The Summit-at-Snoqualmie Master Development Plan Proposal FEIS Physical and Biological Resource Data Tables

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Linking place, process and strategy: Basin-scale view of salmon and steelhead habitats and restoration projects in the Willamette Valley

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

Tenmile Lakes Delta Building Study

Environmental. Plan Update. By Jodie Pavlica

Black Gore Creek Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Geomorphology Studies

San Joaquin River Tributary Sediment Transport and Geomorphology Study

We are interconnected, we are resilient As air temperatures warm forests change, fires increase glaciers retreat, snowpack diminishes sediment

low turbidity high turbidity

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

GARCIA RIVER SEDIMENT TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD

Spring Run Spawning Habitat Assessment Sediment Mobility

Assessment. Assessment

LAUREL MARCUS California Land Stewardship Institute OVERVIEW OF GROUNDWATER STUDIES IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED

Colony Creek Colony Mountain Drive Sediment Management and Flood Protection Evaluation Final Report

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Case Study 8. North Fork Nooksack River In-channel Project

DESCHUTES RIVER BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS ASSESSMENT

Physical modeling to guide river restoration projects: An Overview

Monitoring and evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrates in the Big Hole River and tributaries

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

WATERSHED RESTORATION PLANNING AND PRIORITY SETTING. An Emphasis on Fish Habitat

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Transcription:

2013-2014 Calapooia Basin RBA Snorkel Survey Brief Surveys conducted by Bio-Surveys, LLC. (Steve Trask and Conrad Gowell) Analysis and Reporting prepared by: Steve Trask / Senior Fish Biologist Introduction Project Funded by: Calapooia Watershed Council A large wood placement project was implemented in Brush Cr and its 2 major contributing tributaries (WF Brush and Childers Cr) in September of 2013. A total of 342 logs were placed by excavator in approximately 5.7 stream miles. Just prior to this wood placement, a comprehensive pre project snorkel inventory was conducted in the Brush Cr sub basin to describe the distribution and abundance of salmonids so that a baseline could be established for future project effectiveness monitoring. To begin post project monitoring of this significant restoration action, a replicate snorkel survey was conducted 1 year later in the Brush Cr subbasin. This comparison was designed to quantify any potential changes in the abundance and distribution of salmonids associated with the increase in the abundance of full spanning wood. Due to fiscal constraints, a portion of the Brush Cr mainstem was dropped in the post project inventory (2.4 miles). The section dropped was in the mainstem of Brush Cr below any of the structure sites installed in 2013. The excluded reach extended from the confluence of the WF Brush Cr to the upstream edge of the power line crossing on the Melcher property. This review also includes the results of the 2014 pre project RBA snorkel inventory of a select reach of Courtney Cr, a tributary of the mainstem Calapooia. The selected reach was identified as a potential target for restoration and a pre project baseline of salmonid distribution and abundance was the primary objective of the inventory effort. The beginning and end points of the target reach have been identified in attachment 1 of this document. Results Table 1 presents the relative abundance of each salmonid species and age class observed in the targeted stream reaches. The table also includes inter annual comparisons of abundance for Brush Cr, WF Brush Cr and Childers Cr. The estimates of abundance are based on an expansion of the 20% sample of pool habitats only (riffles / rapids / glides not sampled) and therefore are not meant to represent a population estimate for any of the salmonid species.

Table 1 Stream 0+ % of total Sthd % of total Cutthroat % of total *Brush 2013 Pre 260 47% 5 50% 250 49% *Brush 2014 Post 215 54% 0 215 44% WF Brush 2013 Pre 0 0 0 30 6% WF Brush 2014 Post 0 0 0 75 15% Childers 2013 Pre 290 53% 5 50% 230 45% Childers 2014 Post 180 46% 0 195 40% Courtney Pre 27 0 600 Courtney Trib B Pre 10 0 150 *Brush Cr surveys normalized to represent similar survey lengths Table 1 also contains the results of the pre project inventory in Courtney Cr and its primary headwater tributary (Trib B). Brush Cr A significant observation from the 2 year inventory in the Brush Cr subbasin is the current lack of steelhead utilizing the system for spawning and rearing. No steelhead parr were observed in 2014 and only 2 were observed in 2013 (expanded to 10 from the 20% sub sample). This suggests that for both the 2011 and 2012 brood years, there were no adult steelhead that spawned anywhere in the Brush Cr subbasin. The observations of steelhead parr in 2013 were likely upstream migrants from the mainstem Calapooia (a common strategy for summer survival in temperature limited tributaries of the Willamette). Cutthroat abundance in the Brush Cr subbasin would be classified as low with average reach densities in both sampled years ranging between 0.02 and 0.04 fish / Sqm of pool surface area (the highest average density, 0.04 fish /sqm, was observed in Childers Cr in the post project year). The basin wide abundance of cutthroat between years only varied 5% with a basin total of 510 in 2013 and 485 in 2014. This is well within the range of the variability associated with the snorkel methodology and suggests no measurable change in abundance between the pre and post project inventory. An interesting observation between the pre and post project year was that the pool occupancy rates remained the same (occupancy = % of pools containing at least 1 older age class cutthroat) in mainstem Brush before and after the project (49% to 50%) but the occupancy rate increased in both Childers Cr (33% to 43%) and WF Brush Cr (26% to 48%) post project. This suggests that although the absolute abundance of Cutthroat has yet to exhibit a significant increase, the distribution of cutthroat has been altered by restoration to favor the higher gradient tributary habitats. It follows that the meta

Fish / Sqm population of 1+ and older age class cutthroat encompasses the entire Brush Cr subbasin and that population structure should be viewed on the larger spatial scale. In this example, it is possible that 1+ and older cutthroat that may have historically occupied lower Brush Cr summer habitats are currently being retained in headwater tributaries at a higher rate as a result of the increase in complexity and roughness associated with wood placement. Figure 1 Brush Cr Cutthroat Densities 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 2013 Cuts 2014 Cuts 2013 Trend 2014 Trend 0.1 0.05 0 20 1910 3675 5125 8370 10300 11535 13025 14115 15575 17040 17940 18880 20355 21260 22270 23195 24035 24985 25880 27060 27985 Distance from Confluence of WF Brush Cr Childers Cr Figure 2 below exhibits the comparative distribution of cutthroat between pre and post project years. Both years indicate the presence of an upstream temperature dependant migration from the mainstem of Brush Cr. There is also an observed increase in occupancy and abundance in the highest reaches of the inventory on BLM ownership that is likely a response to the increase in roughness and wood complexity associated with restoration actions.

Fish / Sqm Figure 2 Childers Cr Cutthroat Density 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 Begin restoration reach 2013 Cuts 2014 Cuts 2013 Trend 2014 Trend 0.1 0.05 0 10 465 1000 1515 1905 2585 3225 3965 4545 5075 5695 6265 6625 7325 8005 8620 9025 9595 10305 10980 11570 Total Distance from Mouth (ft) Restoration actions in Childers Cr did not begin until approximately RM 0.6. The trend lines in Figure 2 reflect the interannual changes in average pool density which is heavily influenced by occupancy rates. There is a minor improvement in average pool density between years that is related to more pools being occupied in 2014 (60 %) than in 2013 (33%). This is a trend that suggests the increase in habitat complexity associated with wood placement has improved habitat utilization on the reach scale. It is also interesting that the observed improvements occur in the restored segment of Childers and not the unrestored segment (figure 2). The absolute number of 1+ and older age cutthroat in Childers Cr declined by 15% between the pre and post project years. This decline could be the result of many sources of variation (changes in aquatic temperature profiles that influence the recruitment of fluvial cutthroat from the mainstem Calapooia, variation in interannual spawning success, etc). It is premature to judge the efficacy of the LWD placement project as it relates to impacts associated with cutthroat abundance. This level of post project evaluation should occur at the 5 year interval as structures mature and develop the characteristics that they were designed to deliver (spawning gravel aggradation, channel braiding, impoundment and deep pool scour). At the 5 year interval, nearly a full cutthroat life cycle has been played out with improvements in survival accumulating for each subsequent year class.

Fish / Sqm WF Brush Cr The WF of Brush Cr exhibited a completely different response than observed in Childers Cr. Comparisons between the 2 sampled years exhibit a 150% increase in the abundance of cutthroat (table 1), an increase in pool occupancy rates (26% to 48%) and a doubling in the average pool density (0.01 to 0.02 fish / sqm). Although the distribution pattern of cutthroat observed in figure 3 does not suggest the presence of a temperature dependant migration of cutthroat into WF Brush from the mainstem of Brush Cr, there is a quantifiable increase observed when comparing the pre and post project abundance of cutthroat trout. Temperatures recorded in both WF Brush and Brush Cr were identical (15 deg C) at the time of the survey on August 25, 2014. Figure 3 WF Brush Cr Cutthroat densities 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 2013 Cuts 2014 Cuts 0.1 0.05 0 5 295 710 1015 1490 1675 2155 2490 2840 3100 3340 3615 3920 4195 4415 Total Distance from Mouth (Ft) 4730 5150 5505 5865 6050 6320 6575 7050 Most striking in WF Brush Cr was the complete absence of the 0+ age class of cutthroat in both sampled years which suggests that spawning success remains very low. The observed increase in cutthroat abundance in WF Brush Cr may be the result of multiple factors related to restoration actions (large woody debris placements) and to a change in water management as a result of land owner participation (dam board removal). It is important to note that the primary agricultural landowner on lower WF Brush Cr while partnering to conduct instream restoration, simultaneously altered the timing of dam board installation and removal on 2 formerly impassable irrigation dams within the restored reach. The agreement reached with the CWC was that dam boards would be completely removed from both of the irrigation dams between December 1 and July 1 each year to facilitate open access for spawning migrations of fluvial and anadromous

salmonids from the mainstem of Brush Cr or the Calapooia mainstem. Based on cutthroat migration studies done in other Willamette basin tributaries (Beaver Cr, Marys River, Thompson Dam, VanDewetering), fluvial cutthroat spawning migrations can extend between December and June. While it may not be imperative to provide access for the entire fluvial migration window to sustain viability, broad temporal variation maximizes genetic diversity, increasing resilience. Courtney Cr A pre-project RBA inventory was conducted on Courtney Cr and its primary unnamed headwater tributary (Trib B) between August 29 and Sept 3, 2014. This inventory was conducted to inform the development and design of an instream restoration project that would potentially span up to 5 river miles including 0.2 miles of Trib B. The timing of the inventory was scheduled to coincide with peak summer temperature profiles to assist in our understanding of how stream temperatures and flow currently limit the abundance of functional summer rearing habitat in the mainstem of Courtney Cr. It is important to recognize that the start point of the inventory was high in the basin and the result of a preliminary scoping exercise conducted by the CWC to identify the portion of the Courtney Cr subbasin that may retain some level of natural function capable of supporting salmonids (the top aquatic predator utilized as the primary indicator species of system function). The survey began at a bridge crossing on Courtney Cr at road mile 1.0 on Courtney Cr Drive. This point was approximately 17 river miles from the confluence of Courtney Cr with the mainstem Calapooia. This lineal distance includes the streams traverse across almost exclusively low gradient farm land and at least 7.7 miles of Walton and Shedd sloughs. Some of the implications of this lower stream morphology and land use are reviewed in the discussion section. Results The first 0.9 miles of the inventoried stream segment (which begins at RM 17) encountered only isolated pool habitats with no contiguous surface flow. Some of the isolated pools were as far as 1,000 ft apart separated by only dry stream bed. Figure 4 describes the stark absence of any salmonids in this portion of Courtney Cr. In addition, there were no cutthroat observed for 1.7 miles even though pools became linked 0.9 miles above the start point. Many dead and dying fish of all species (cutthroat, lamprey, red side shiner) were observed in this first 1.7 miles of the inventory. Essentially these habitats were experiencing high mortalities as summer flows subsided, water temperatures soared and DO levels decreased. When the linkage to headwater refugia are terminated, mortalities are significant and non discriminate. Temperatures in this first 1.7 miles were highly variable between 16 and 21 deg C. The variation was associated with the variable pool depths in each of the isolated pools. Deeper pools were accessing a higher percentage of the available hyporheic linkage. Cutthroat started to be present 1.7 miles above the start point at a point where surface flows relinked isolated pool habitats. At mile 2.2 above the survey start point a cold ground water seep joined a 5 ft deep pool that provided thermal refuge for upstream

Fish / Sqm migrants seeking thermal refuge from warm and nearly isolated habitats downstream. There were a total of 64 cutthroat observed in this pool (92% were 2+ and older adults). 420 feet above this pool was a smaller pool with 28 cutthroat (100% 2+ and older adults). Many of these older age class cutthroat were in the 16 inch range suggesting the presence of a fluvial life history strategy in the subbasin. This suggests that even fluvial cutthroat in the system are being forced out of the lower basin toward headwater thermal refugia during low summer flows suggesting the absence of lower basin thermal refugia (viable ground water seeps from the loss of wetland storage) or the existence of an upper threshold in some water quality parameter being reached in the lower Courtney Cr system. The abnormally high density of older age class cutthroat is a clear indication of a temperature dependant upstream migration from the lower mainstem to thermal refugia in the headwaters. This conclusion is corroborated by the presence of equally high densities of cutthroat below an 8 inch perched culvert at 3.8 miles above the start point (figure 4). The last observation of significance was the absence of cutthroat in the last ½ mile of the surveyed mainstem. This is an usual pattern of distribution with cutthroat densities usually increasing in headwater reaches as water quality parameters improve (Temperature, DO, etc). The presence of a dense overstory of stream adjacent blackberry has created a condition that deprives the aquatic corridor from solar influence which terminates the potential for primary productivity. In addition, substrates in the reach were clay dominated and providing limited opportunity for algal development or macro invertebrate colonization. Figure 4 Courtney Cr Cutthroat Density 2014 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 75 1395 2280 2585 2765 3545 4060 4365 4610 4870 Distance above 1st bridge on Courtney Cr drive (RM 17) 4890 6260 7725 8850 10205 11570 12070 13600 15270 16280 17440 18435 19310 19915 22555 23145 23970 24545 25125

Discussion There are basin scale issues that likely influence the observed results that are important to identify. If we assume that Courtney Cr continues to display multiple cutthroat life history strategies (resident and fluvial) then some consideration needs to be given to the concept of seasonal habitat linkage. To review, the fluvial life history dictates that cutthroat (variable age classes) drop out of higher gradient headwater reaches to rear in lower basin stream segments that offer a greater potential for rapid growth (access to a larger and more diverse food base and the opportunity to optimize temperature profiles). These outmigrants must return as adults to headwater reaches for spawning and incubation because of the underlying gradient of the lower reaches that is incapable of sorting viable spawning gravels. This upstream migration requires the basic necessity of contiguous flows that exhibit adequate water quantity and quality for completing the migration between habitats. So very little is known about the timing, range and duration of this fluvial life history that it is impossible for us at this juncture with our limited knowledge base to develop a relationship between the current levels of observed dysfunction and the environmental conditions that create them or exacerbate them. However, it is safe to say that there are multiple issues at play that when combined create catastrophic conditions for the fluvial life history and the linkages between the lower and upper basin that are necessary to maintain viability. As landowners and organizations move together corporately to restore system function, it is important to have some of these issues at least identified as potential vectors of the observed dysfunction. A short list would include water quantity, water quality and access for unimpeded summer and winter migration. The water quantity issues involve the loss of wetland habitats necessary for seasonal and groundwater storage and excessive agricultural and domestic irrigation during pinch period low summer flows. It is clear from the late August inventory that massive mortalities in the standing crop of cutthroat (both fluvial and resident) are occurring in Courtney Cr associated with some combination of these two issues that is resulting in a completely dry channel that terminates access to critical thermal refuge in the headwaters. One of the significant observations from the inventory was the differential pool temperatures observed within the isolated pools of the lower 1.7 miles of Courtney above the start point. Deeper pools were accessing a higher percentage of the hyporheic flow sequestered in the accumulated gravel lens providing at least temporary thermal refugia. For this stream segment, log structures should be designed to scour into the existing bedload for the provision of deeper and higher quality thermal refugia. Additional aggradation within this stream segment from the application of full spanning structures would likely exacerbate the current problem. Isolated pools would be less abundant and dry out quicker. Concentrating some effort in the reach upstream of the identified dry channel for the development of off channel wetland restoration to recharge ground water sources would be a high priority restoration objective. In addition, the development of alternate irrigation solutions or the retirement of water rights through the purchase of conservation easements would also be a high priority restoration objective above the observed dry channel reach.

Attachment 1