STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

Similar documents
Lateral Torsional Buckling (sections class 1-3) - Column Item COx

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6

Design Examples using midas Gen to Eurocode 3. Integrated Design System for Building and General Structures

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

to introduce the principles of stability and elastic buckling in relation to overall buckling, local buckling

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B. Made by IR Date Oct Checked by FH/NB Date Oct Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Nov Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Verification Examples

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

= = = 1,000 1,000 1,250. g M0 g M1 g M2 = = = 1,100 1,100 1,250 [ ] 1 0,000 8,000 HE 140 B 0,0. [m] Permanent Permanent Variable Variable Variable

TOPIC TRAINING CODE CHECK COLD-FORMED STEEL PROFILES

Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3

Design of Compression Members

Steel Frame Design Manual

3. Stability of built-up members in compression


Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

Basis of Design, a case study building

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Advanced Training Aluminium

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS

On Design Method of Lateral-torsional Buckling of Beams: State of the Art and a New Proposal for a General Type Design Method

COMPARISON BETWEEN BS 5950: PART 1: 2000 & EUROCODE 3 FOR THE DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME CHAN CHEE HAN

A Parametric Study on Lateral Torsional Buckling of European IPN and IPE Cantilevers H. Ozbasaran

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

9-3. Structural response

Unit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir

APOLLO SALES LTD PUBLIC ACCESS SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

PES Institute of Technology

Mechanical Properties of Materials

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

C6 Advanced design of steel structures

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Formulation of Equivalent Steel Section for Partially Encased Composite Column under Concentric Gravity Loading

Mechanics of Structure

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

Compression Members Columns II

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

APOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section

DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS - II

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

BUCKLING STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BARS AND FRAMES, AND SPHERICAL SHELLS

LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF SPLICED COLUMNS WITH SINGLE ROW BOLTED BUTT-PLATES

If you take CT5143 instead of CT4143 then write this at the first of your answer sheets and skip problem 4 and 6.

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area

Clayey sand (SC)

needed to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods used to design concentric and eccentric columns.

Sample Question Paper

OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

2. (a) Explain different types of wing structures. (b) Explain the advantages and disadvantages of different materials used for aircraft

ADVANCED CONCEPT TRAINING

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Sub. Code:

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G

Steel connections. Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[ mm] Connection ID : 1

Use Hooke s Law (as it applies in the uniaxial direction),

Design of a Steel I-section for Bending, Shear and Axial Force

POST-BUCKLING STRENGTH OF STEEL TEE COLUMNS

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

Chapter 12 Elastic Stability of Columns

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design

MS Excel Toolkit: Design of steel-concrete composite columns in accordance with EN

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted)

DIF SEK. PART 5a WORKED EXAMPLES. DIFSEK Part 5a: Worked examples 0 / 62

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

Transcription:

GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for App'd by STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN1993-1-1:2005) In accordance with EN1993-1-1:2005 incorporating Corrigenda February 2006 and April details type; UKC 356x406x287 (Corus Advance) Steel grade; S275 From table 3.1: Nominal values of yield strength f y and ultimate tensile strength f u for hot rolled structural steel Nominal thickness of element; t = max(t f, t w) = 36.5 mm Nominal yield strength; f y = 275 N/mm 2 Nominal ultimate tensile strength; f u = 430 N/mm 2 Modulus of elasticity; E = 210000 N/mm 2 1

Consulting Company for App'd by Partial factors - 6.1 Resistance of cross-sections; γ M0 = 1.00 Resistance of members to instability; γ M1 = 1.00 Resistance of tensile members to fracture; γ M2 = 1.25 Lateral restraint Distance between major axis restraints; Distance between minor axis restraints; L y = 5000 mm L z = 5000 mm Effective length factors Effective length factor in major axis; K y = 0.700 Effective length factor in minor axis; K z = 1.000 Effective length factor for torsion; K LT = 1.000 Classification of cross sections - 5.5 ε = [235 N/mm 2 / f y] = 0.92 Internal compression parts subject to bending and compression - Table 5.2 (sheet 1 of 3) Width of section; c = d = 290.2 mm α = min([h / 2 + N Ed / (2 t w f y) - (t f+ r)] / c, 1) = 1.000 c / t w = 13.9 ε <= 396 ε / (13 α - 1); Class 1 Outstand flanges - Table 5.2 (sheet 2 of 3) Width of section; c = (b - t w - 2 r) / 2 = 173 mm c / t f = 5.1 ε <= 9 ε; Class 1 is class 1 Check shear - 6.2.6 Height of web; Shear area factor; η = 1.000 Design shear force parallel to z axis; h w = h - 2 t f = 320.6 mm h w / t w < 72 ε / η Shear buckling resistance can be ignored V z,ed = 200 kn Shear area - cl 6.2.6(3); A v = max(a - 2 b t f + (t w + 2 r) t f, η h w t w) = 9378 mm 2 Design shear resistance - cl 6.2.6(2); Design shear force parallel to y axis; V c,z,rd = V pl,z,rd = A v (f y / [3]) / γ M0 = 1489 kn PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force V y,ed = 30 kn Shear area - cl 6.2.6(3); A v = max(2 b t f - (t w + 2 r) t f, A - (h w t w)) = 29325 mm 2 Design shear resistance - cl 6.2.6(2); V c,y,rd = V pl,y,rd = A v (f y / [3]) / γ M0 = 4656 kn PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force 2

Consulting Company for App'd by Check bending moment major (y-y) axis - 6.2.5 Design bending moment; M y,ed = 450 knm Design bending resistance moment - eq 6.13; M c,y,rd = M pl,y,rd = W pl.y f y / γ M0 = 1598.4 knm Slenderness ratio for lateral torsional buckling Correction factor - Table 6.6; k c = 0.603 C 1 = 1 / k 2 c = 2.75 Curvature factor; g = [1 - (I z / I y)] = 0.783 Poissons ratio; ν = 0.3 Shear modulus; G = E / [2 (1 + ν)] = 80769 N/mm 2 Unrestrained length; L = 1.00 L z = 5000 mm Elastic critical buckling moment; M cr = C 1 π 2 E I z / (L 2 g) [I w / I z + L 2 G I t / (π 2 E I z)] = 29413.9 knm Slenderness ratio for lateral torsional buckling; λ LT = [W pl.y f y / M cr] = 0.233 Limiting slenderness ratio; λ LT,0 = 0.4 λ LT < λ LT,0 - Lateral torsional buckling can be ignored Design resistance for buckling - 6.3.2.1 Buckling curve - Table 6.5; b Imperfection factor - Table 6.3; α LT = 0.34 Correction factor for rolled sections; β = 0.75 LTB reduction determination factor; φ LT = 0.5 [1 + α LT ( λ LT - λ LT,0) + β λ 2 LT ] = 0.492 LTB reduction factor - eq 6.57; χ LT = min(1 / [φ LT + (φ 2 LT - β λ 2 LT )], 1, 1 / λ 2 LT ) = 1.000 Modification factor; f = min(1-0.5 (1 - k c) [1-2 ( λ LT - 0.8) 2 ], 1) = 0.929 Modified LTB reduction factor - eq 6.58; χ LT,mod = min(χ LT / f, 1) = 1.000 Design buckling resistance moment - eq 6.55; M b,rd = χ LT,mod W pl.y f y / γ M1 = 1598.4 knm PASS - Design buckling resistance moment exceeds design bending moment Check bending moment minor (z-z) axis - 6.2.5 Design bending moment; M z,ed = 125 knm Design bending resistance moment - eq 6.13; M c,z,rd = M pl,z,rd = W pl.z f y / γ M0 = 811 knm PASS - Design bending resistance moment exceeds design bending moment Check compression - 6.2.4 Design compression force; Design resistance of section - eq 6.10; Slenderness ratio for major (y-y) axis buckling Critical buckling length; Critical buckling force; N Ed = 4500 kn N c,rd = N pl,rd = A f y / γ M0 = 10057 kn L cr,y = L y K y = 3500 mm N cr,y = π 2 E SEC3 I y / L 2 cr,y = 168981.8 kn 3

Consulting Company for App'd by Slenderness ratio for buckling - eq 6.50; λ y = [A f y / N cr,y] = 0.244 Design resistance for buckling - 6.3.1.1 b Imperfection factor - Table 6.1; α y = 0.34 Buckling reduction determination factor; φ y = 0.5 [1 + α y ( λ y - 0.2) + λ 2 y ] = 0.537 Buckling reduction factor - eq 6.49; χ y = min(1 / [φ y + (φ 2 y - λ 2 y )], 1) = 0.984 N b,y,rd = χ y A f y / γ M1 = 9899.8 kn Slenderness ratio for minor (z-z) axis buckling Critical buckling length; L cr,z = L z K z = 5000 mm Critical buckling force; N cr,z = π 2 E SEC3 I z / L 2 cr,z = 32065.3 kn Slenderness ratio for buckling - eq 6.50; λ z = [A f y / N cr,z] = 0.560 Design resistance for buckling - 6.3.1.1 c Imperfection factor - Table 6.1; α z = 0.49 Buckling reduction determination factor; φ z = 0.5 [1 + α z ( λ z - 0.2) + λ 2 z ] = 0.745 Buckling reduction factor - eq 6.49; χ z = min(1 / [φ z + (φ 2 z - λ 2 z )], 1) = 0.809 N b,z,rd = χ z A f y / γ M1 = 8134.2 kn Check torsional and torsional-flexural buckling - 6.3.1.4 Torsional buckling length factor; K T = 1.00 Torsional buckling length; L cr,t = max(l y, L z) K T = 5000 mm Distance from shear centre to centroid in y axis; y 0 = 0.0 mm Distance from shear centre to centroid in z axis; z 0 = 0.0 mm Radius of gyration; i 0 = [i 2 y + i 2 z ] = 194.6 mm Elastic critical torsional buckling force; N cr,t = 1 / i 2 0 [G I t + π 2 E SEC3 I w / L 2 cr,t ] = 57695.2 kn Torsion factor; β T = 1 - (y 0 / i 0) 2 = 1.000 Elastic critical torsional-flexural buckling force N cr,tf = N cr,y / (2 β T) [1 + N cr,t / N cr,y - [(1 - N cr,t / N cr,y) 2 + 4 (y 0 / i 0) 2 N cr,t / N cr,y]] = 57695.2 kn Elastic critical buckling force; N cr = min(n cr,t, N cr,tf) = 57695.2 kn Slenderness ratio for torsional buckling - eq 6.52; λ T = [A f y / N cr] = 0.418 Design resistance for buckling - 6.3.1.1 c Imperfection factor - Table 6.1; α T = 0.49 Buckling reduction determination factor; φ T = 0.5 [1 + α T ( λ T - 0.2) + λ 2 T ] = 0.640 Buckling reduction factor - eq 6.49; χ T = min(1 / [φ T + (φ 2 T - λ 2 T )], 1) = 0.888 N b,t,rd = χ T A f y / γ M1 = 8930.8 kn 4

Consulting Company for App'd by Combined bending and axial force - 6.2.9 Normal force to plastic resistance force ratio; n = N Ed / N pl,rd = 0.45 Web area to gross area ratio; a w = min((a - 2 b t f) / A, 0.5) = 0.20 Design plastic moment resistance (y-y) - eq 6.13; M pl,y,rd = W pl.y f y / γ M0 = 1598.4 knm Reduced plastic mnt resistance (y-y)- eq 6.36; M N,y,Rd = M pl,y,rd min((1 - n) / (1-0.5 a w), 1) = 983.3 knm Design plastic moment resistance (z-z) - eq 6.13; M pl,z,rd = W pl.z f y / γ M0 = 811.0 knm Reduced plastic mnt resistance (z-z) - eq 6.38; M N,z,Rd = M pl,z,rd (1 - ((n-a w) / (1- a w)) 2 ) = 735.0 knm Parameter introducing effect of biaxial bending; α_bi = 2.00 Parameter introducing effect of biaxial bending; β_bi = max(5 n, 1) = 2.24 Interaction formula eq (6.41); (M y,ed / M N,y,Rd) α_bi + (M z,ed / M N,z,Rd) β_bi = 0.228 PASS - Reduced bending resistance moment exceeds design bending moment Check combined bending and compression - 6.3.3 Equivalent uniform moment factors - Table B.3; C my = 0.400 C mz = 0.600 C mlt = 0.400 Interaction factors k ij for members susceptible to torsional deformations - Table B.2 Characteristic moment resistance; M y,rk = W pl.y f y = 1598.4 knm Characteristic moment resistance; M z,rk = W pl.z f y = 811 knm Characteristic resistance to normal force; N Rk = A f y = 10057 kn Interaction factors; k yy = C my [1 + min( λ y - 0.2, 0.8) N Ed / (χ y N Rk / γ M1)] = 0.408 k zy = 1-0.1 max(1, λ z) N Ed / ((C mlt - 0.25) χ z N Rk / γ M1) = 0.631 k zz = C mz [1 + min(2 λ z - 0.6, 1.4) N Ed / (χ z N Rk / γ M1)] = 0.773 k yz = 0.6 k zz = 0.464 Interaction formulae - eq 6.61 & eq 6.62; N Ed / (χ y N Rk / γ M1) + k yy M y,ed / (χ LT M y,rk / γ M1) + k yz M z,ed / (M z,rk / γ M1) = 0.641 N Ed / (χ z N Rk / γ M1) + k zy M y,ed / (χ LT M y,rk / γ M1) + k zz M z,ed / (M z,rk / γ M1) = 0.850 PASS - Combined bending and compression checks are satisfied 5