Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Similar documents
BANK EROSION AND HISTORICAL MORPHOLOGY STUDY OF THE MIDDLE KASKASKIA RIVER. Building Strong

Kaskaskia Morphology Study Headwaters to Lake Shelbyville

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

BANK EROSION STUDY OF THE KASKASKIA RIVER, CARLYLE LAKE TO NEW ATHENS, ILLINOIS

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Streams. Stream Water Flow

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

Rivers and Streams. Streams. Hydrologic Cycle. Drainage Basins and Divides. Colorado River Drainage Basin. Colorado Drainage Basins.

Illinois State Water Survey Division

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

The Yellow River Initiative: The Birth of a System Approach to Challenges Facing the Everglades of the North

Squaw Creek. General Information

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Floods Lecture #21 20

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

Fresh Water: Streams, Lakes Groundwater & Wetlands

Historical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods

PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. By Brett Lucas

In the space provided, write the letter of the description that best matches the term or phrase. a. any form of water that falls to Earth s

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Great Lakes Tributary Modeling: Canaseraga Creek Watershed

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

Griswold Creek August 22, 2013

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Analysis of the Effects of Bendway Weir Construction on Channel Cross Sectional Geometry

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

27. Running Water I (p ; )

Remaining Capacity in Great Lakes Reservoirs

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

1 INTRODUCTION AND MAJOR FINDINGS... 1


FRESH SURFACE WATER Vol. III - River Navigation and Associated Structures - D. M. Admiraal, M. H. García RIVER NAVIGATION AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

low turbidity high turbidity

11/12/2014. Running Water. Introduction. Water on Earth. The Hydrologic Cycle. Fluid Flow

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Application of an Enhanced, Fine-Scale SWAT Model to Target Land Management Practices for Maximizing Pollutant Reduction and Conservation Benefits

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Environmental Geology Chapter 9 Rivers and Flooding

VICTORIA BEND HYDRAULIC SEDIMENT RESPONSE MODEL INVESTIGATION LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MILES

Fluvial Systems Lab Environmental Geology Lab Dr. Johnson

Sedimentation in the Nile River

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

APPENDIX A M&T/Llano Seco Long-Term Water Reliability Study These photos are examples of rock spurs in use throughout the United States

Surface Water and Stream Development

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PHASE III REPORT

Appendix K.2: Sediment Management Excerpt from South Orange County Hydromodification Management Plan

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

STABILIZATION OF THE H&CT RAILWAY STONE DAM WALTER E. SKIPWITH, PE, JOYCE CRUM, AIA AND JOHN BAUMGARTNER, PE. Introduction.

Landscape Development

PolyMet NorthMet Project

Stream Classification

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

The Hydrologic Cycle STREAM SYSTEMS. Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. The Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle

Assessment. Assessment

Working with Natural Stream Systems

Science of Natural Disasters: RIVERS& FLOODS! 27 April 2016

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

CHANNEL GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO DISTURBANCES ASSESSED USING STREAMGAGE INFORMATION

Design Hydraulic Study. Bridge 09C-0134, Blairsden-Graeagle Road over Middle Fork Feather River. Plumas County. Prepared for:

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Degradation Concerns related to Bridge Structures in Alberta

Transcription:

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River US Army Corps Of Engineers St. Louis District Fayette County Soil and Water Conservation District Team Partners : Carlyle Lake Ecosystem Partnership

Vicinity Study Reach

Background Information The Kaskaskia is a typical alluvial channel with a length of over 300 miles, while the total fall is approximately 390 ft The watershed of the Kaskaskia River covers 5,790 mi 2, the second largest in the state of Illinois The length of the watershed is about 175 miles and has an average width of 33 miles, with a maximum width of 55 miles The natural flow regime has been altered by three major Corps of Engineer s projects. Two flood control reservoirs; the 26,000-acre Carlyle Lake Project (1967) and the 11,200-acre Lake Shelbyville (1970). The final project was the Kaskaskia River Navigation Project (1972)

Study Divided into Two Sections Middle Kaskaskia Shelbyville Dam to Carlyle Lake Consists of 98 River Miles Major Factors in the present river morphology were the major land use changes that occurred during the past 170 years Bank Erosion Study Completed in 2003 Lower Kaskaskia Carlyle Dam to the Confluence of the Mississippi Consists of 95 River Miles Major Factor in the present river morphology was the straightening of 52 miles of river for navigation purposes Effect of the Kaskaskia River Navigation Project Completed in 1999

Middle Kaskaskia Section Shelbyville Dam to Carlyle Lake Drainage area of 2140 mi 2 5 10 Peak flow at Vandalia 19,300 cfs 15 20 25 30 35 40 Researched several land use maps and aerial photos 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 100 Analyzed over 100 river bends N 95

Analysis and Data Collection Methodology The first complete survey of the State of Illinois was conducted by the Government Land Office (GLO) between 1820 and 1830. Of the GLO, only miles 0-50 of the Kaskaskia River and its floodplain were available Aerial photos of the entire main channel and floodplain of the Kaskaskia River were gathered for the years 1938, 1966, and 1998. The aerial photos were scanned in and large mosaics were generated The GLO was used for qualitative comparison of the relative position of the river in 1820 versus 1998. It was also used for land use changes of the floodplain in 1820 versus 1938, 1966, and 1998 The 1938, 1966, and 1998 aerial photos were used for qualitative comparison of relative position of the river attributes such as width, length, wetted edge, etc. and also for land use changes, feet of bare bank, etc.

1820 GLO Survey Kaskaskia River and Basin miles 0 50 N

1966 Mosaic N

River Length and Sinuosity River Length The river was measured as approximately 102 miles in 1938 and 98 miles in 1998, an overall loss of 4 miles 101 100 99 100 98 The sinuosity of the entire study reach was computed as 1.8 in 1938 and 1.7 in 1998 Feet 98 97 96 96 95 94 1938 1966 1998 Year

Average Channel Widths and Widening Rates The average channel width was approximately 92 ft in 1938, 111 ft in 1966, and 141 ft in 1998 This resulted in an overall channel width increase of over 54% from 1938 to 1998 160.00 140.00 120.00 100.00 141.15 Kaskaskia Study: Average River Width 111.18 92.06 The channel widened, on average of 0.8 ft/yr between 1938 and 1998 feet 80.00 60.00 40.00 Widening rate immediately downstream of Shelbyville Dam is the same as the average widening rate 20.00 0.00 1998 1966 1938

Channel Widths (1938, 1966, and 1998) 300.00 250.00 Min 50 ft (1938) Max 260 ft (1998) River Width (ft) 200.00 150.00 1938 1966 1998 100.00 50.00 0.00 0.252.755.257.7510.3 12.815.317.820.322.825.327.830.332.835.337.8 40.342.845.347.850.352.855.357.860.362.8 65.367.870.372.875.377.880.382.885.387.8 90.392.895.397.8 100 Lake Carlyle Buck Creek Hikory Creek Vandalia Carson Hog Creek Becks Creek Richland Creek Bowling Green Cowden Robinson Jordan Creek Creek Opossum Creek Shelbyville River Mile ( 0 Mile at the Intersection of Lake Carlyle and the Kaskaskia River and proceeding North)

Land Use Change (River Miles 0-50) The total floodplain area between miles 0 and 50 was approximately 39,500 acres Total Floodplain Area in Acres: 1820 Mile 0-50 Total Floodplain Area in Acres: 1938 Mile 0-50 13472.4 In 1820, 99.9 % of the floodplain was forested 39493 Cleared Timber 26020.6 Cleared Timber By 1998, 80% of the floodplain was cleared Total Floodplain Area in Acres: 1966 Mile 0-50 11272.5 Total Floodplain Area in Acres: 1998 Mile 0-50 7856 28220.5 Cleared Timber 31637 Cleared Timber

Land Use Change (Total Floodplain) The total floodplain area between miles 0 and 102 was measured as approximately 60,300 acres It was estimated that by 1966, 73% of the total floodplain was cleared and by 1998 over 84% was cleared Total Floodplain Area in Acres: 1938 Mile 0-102 Cleared Timber 16445.9 43867.4 Total Floodplain Area in Acres: 1966 Mile 0-102 13563 46750.3 Cleared Timber Total Floodplain Area in Acres: 1998 Mile 0-102 9729 Cleared Timber 50584.3

Historical Flow Trends Historical flow trends were examined at the Vandalia and Shelbyville gages Average annual flow rate increased 17% between the period 1972 to 1999 (1,841cfs) compared to the period 1842-1969 (1,532cfs) FLOWRATE, CFS 55000 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 YEARLY PEAK FLOW & YEARLY AVERAGE FLOW VANDALIA, IL1915-1999 0 1914 1924 1934 1944 1954 1964 1974 1984 1994 YEAR YEARLY AVERAGE FLOW YEARLY PEAK FLOW Linear (YEARLY AVERAGE FLOW) Linear (YEARLY PEAK FLOW)

Historical Precipitation Trends Annual precipitation at Urbana, Illinois between 1900 and 2001 Tend line indicates that the average annual rain fall is increasing

Current State of the Middle Kaskaskia River Bank erosion was prevalent throughout the study reach Mile 70 Most bend channels were actively eroding, containing vertical banks, large sand bars, downed trees and channel blockages Mile 53

Current State of the Middle Kaskaskia River Due to the increased widening, decrease in sinuosity and reduction of the channels ability to transport sediment the channel is transforming 1938 Sinuous Canaliform 1998 Sinuous Braided Canaliform

Effects on Tributaries Most of the tributaries have been channelized in the basin Middle Robinson Creek Headcutting has occurred along most of these channels, with widespread deposition of fine material The middle reaches of the tributaries have experienced moderate to sustainable bank erosion Eroded Drainage Ditch

Lower Kaskaskia Section Carlyle Dam to Confluence of Mississippi Divided into three river regimes Drainage area of over 3,800 mi 2 Peak flow at Kasky Lock 50,300 cfs Analyzed over 130 bends

The Kaskaskia River Navigation Project The Kaskaskia River Project is part of the national transportation system. It is integrated with a part of the 26,000 mile inland waterway system. It is also integrated with the North American railway system and highway system, giving it intermodal connectivity. The Kaskaskia River Project was completed in 1976 at a Federal cost of $140 Million. The State of Illinois was the local sponsor for the project contributing $24 Million in funding for land acquisition and spoil site development. Since opening in 1976 the Kaskaskia River Project has originated or terminated more than 53 million tons of cargo valued in excess of $2.6 Billion.

A River Transformed Original Channel The final excavation of the navigation channel was completed in 1972 The lock and dam was completed in 1974 Navigation Channel

Morphological Effects of the Navigation Project Channelization of 36 miles, forming a 9 ft deep and 300 ft wide navigation channel (1972), overall reduction of 16 miles of channel length Channel straightening induced a destructive headcut near Fayetteville and moved upstream causing loss of private property and damage to the bottomland forest and aquatic habitat. The slope increased on average of 80% from 0.25 ft/mile to 0.45 ft/mile and width increased on average of 80% from 125 ft to 225 ft From 1972 to 1982 an estimated 2,500,000 yd 3 deposited within 6 miles of the upper navigation reach between Fayetteville and New Athens In 1982 a grade control structure was built in Fayetteville at the upstream end of the navigation channel to eliminate the headcutting but the structure was unable to arrest the headcuts that had already moved upstream of the project reach.

Common Effects of Channel Straightening Natural Stream Condition L1 A B L1 L1 L1 C1 Altered Stream Condition Oxbows, Remnant Channels A B Excavated and Widened Channel C2 Fall of River (h) Natural Stream Slope L2 Altered Stream Slope Headcut A B L2 C2 C1 L1 B k E i Ch l Wid i

Results of Headcutting Bank Erosion, Channel Widening L1 Natural Channel Starting To Form Within Excavated Channel Upstream Translating Headcut, Channel Deepening, and Accelerated Bank Erosion Material Deposits Within Excavated Channel

Modeling a Headcut

Knickpoint Location 450 River Mile vs River Width Knickpoint approximately 33 miles upstream of the grade control structure 400 350 River Width (ft) 300 250 200 150 Knickpoint 1978 Knickpoint 1988 Knickpoint 1998 1962 1978 1988 1998 10 per. Mov. Avg. (1962) 10 per. Mov. Avg. (1978) 10 per. Mov. Avg. (1988) 10 per. Mov. Avg. (1998) 100 50 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Miles Above Fayetteville, Illinois

Effects on Tributaries Headcuts are not isolated to the main channel, they adversely effect the entire system

Current Sate of River Three Distinct River Regimes Regime One Lake Carlyle to 7 miles downstream of Highway 160 (14 Miles Upstream of Fayetteville) Low to Moderate Traditional Bank Erosion

Current Sate of River Three Distinct River Regimes Regime Two Immediately after project construction 7 miles downstream of Highway 160 (14 Miles Upstream of Fayetteville) to approximately 2 miles below High Banks High Erosion, Channel Widening, Channel Downcutting, Loss of Bottomland Trees Present day

Current Sate of River Three Distinct River Regimes Regime Three New trees and bankline 2 Miles Below High Banks to Fayetteville Dominant Sand Bar Formations, Development of Willows (Natural Healing) New trees and bankline

General River Morphology Pattern 1.44 to 2.10 sinuosity Dimension 1962, 1978, 1988 and 1998 aerials were analyzed and the widening rate ranged from 0.14ft/yr to 5ft/yr Profile Degradation is occurring on the lower part of the study reach due to the headcut. The knickpoint is located approximately 33 miles above Fayetteville, upstream of this point there is no major degradation of the channel. The Carlyle Dam has no apparent effect on the stability of the channel. Bends were measured immediately downstream of the dam and no significant increase in bank erosion was evident. (Lane s Equation discharge and load are on opposite sides of scale so they cancel each other out)