A note on the electostatic enegy of two point chages axiv:1306.0401v1 [physics.pop-ph] 3 Jun 013 A C Tot Instituto de Física Univesidade Fedeal do io de Janeio Caixa Postal 68.58; CEP 1941-97 io de Janeio, Bazil June 13, 013 Abstact The electostatic field enegy due to two fixed point-like chages shows some peculia featues concening the distibution in space of the field enegy density of the system. Hee we discuss the evaluation of the field enegy and the mathematical details that lead to those peculia and non-intuitive physical featues. email: tot@if.ufj.b. 1
a c tot 013 1 Intoduction The electostatic enegy of two point chages is given by the simple expession U 1 = 1 4πǫ 0 q 1 q, 1) wheeis distance between the chages the values of which aeq 1 andq. If the chages have the same algebical sign the electostatic enegy is positive but if the algebical signs ae not equal then electostatic enegy is negative. Equation 1) is intepeted as a potential enegy due to the spatial configuation of the chages. If constaints foces ae emoved this enegy will be tansfomed into kinetic enegy of the chages. On the othe hand, fom the field point of view the enegy of an electostatic system is given by the expession U = 1 ǫ 0 EP) dv 0, ) whee EP) is the total field of the electostatic system at a point P of the space, that is EP) = E 1 P)+E P). 3) P α 1 β θ q 1 q z Figue 1: Geomety fo the evaluation of the inteaction enegy of two point chages.
a c tot 013 3 The field enegy can be split into thee sepaate contibutions ǫ 0 E P)dV = ǫ 0 E 1P)dV + ǫ 0 E P)dV +ǫ 0 E 1 P) E P)dV. 4) The fist two tems on HS of 4) can be intepeted as the divegent) self-enegies of the point chages and in a classical context simply hid unde the ug. The cossed tem is intepeted as the inteaction enegy of the two chages and must epoduce 1), that is ǫ 0 E 1 P) E P)dV = 1 4πǫ 0 q 1 q, 5) but this must poved by explicit evaluation of integal. The fist time the autho head of this poblem was when he was eading the fist edition of efeence [1] whee it was pesented as an advanced poblem in a special chapte at the end of the book. The challenge was to pove that the potential enegy point of view and the field enegy one wee not incompatible. ecently, in a pape on the ole of field enegy in intoductoy physics couses Hilbon [] commented on this and some peculia featues concening the distibution in space of the field enegy of the system. To undestand these featues conside fo simplicity two equal positive chages then 1) thee is a spheical egion centeed at one of the chages that does not contibute to the total inteaction enegy; ) this egion can be divided into two subegions that contibute with algebaically opposite enegies and the amount of negative enegy is vey small when compaed with the total enegy, and finally 90% of the field enegy lies in a limited pat of the space, see the appendix in []. Hee the pesent autho will ty to show to the inteested eade the details of those peculia and non-intuitive aspects by pefoming explicitly the calculations. Evaluation of the electostatic enegy It is convenient to use spheical coodinates with the oigin at one of the chages and the polaz-axis along the line that passes though both, see Figue 1. Let us set q 1 = q = e. The cossed tem eads E 1 E = e 4πǫ 0 ) 1 e 1 e. 6) Now we intoduce, see Figue 1 1 = + 7) hence = 1 + 1 cos θ, 8) and, see Figue 1 ê 1 ê = cos α. 9)
a c tot 013 4 E 1 E > 0 egion E 1 E 1 q 1 =e θ q =e E 1 E < 0 egion E 1 E = 0 suface E E 1 Figue : The distibution of the electostatic enegy density fo two equal positive point chages. Theefoe E 1 E = e 4πǫ 0 ) 1 cos α ). 1 + 10) 1 cos θ To elate α and θ we apply the sine law to the tiangle in Figue 1 sin α = sin θ. 11) Combining this elation with the fundamental tignometic identitycos α+sin α = 1, we find afte some simple manipulations cos α = 1 1 cos θ). 1) Now we take 8) into the equation above and afte some simplifications we get 1 1 cos θ ) = 1 cos θ) 1 + 1 cos θ. 13)
a c tot 013 5 It follows that cos α = 1 cos θ 1 + 1 cos θ, 14) and E 1 E = e 4πǫ 0 ) 1 Theefoe we must now compute 1 cos θ 1 + 1 cos θ ) 3/. 15) U 1 = ǫ 0 e 4πǫ 0 ) 0 1d 1 Ω 1 1 cos θ 1 + 1 cos θ ) dω 16) 3/ whee dω = sin θdθdφ. The integation ove the azimuthal angle is tivial and yields a facto π, and upon intoducing the vaiable ξ = cos θ we have U 1 = e 8πǫ 0 whee we have defined 0 f 1 )d 1, 17) f 1 ) = +1 1 1 ξ 1 + 1 ξ ) dξ. 18) 3/ This integal can evaluated staightfowadly and because > 0, 1 > 0, we can wite the esult as f 1 ) = 1 + 1 ) + 1 ) 1 ) 1 + 1 )1. 19) To poceeed we must conside sepaately two cases. Case 1 <. In this case it is easily seen that f 1 ) = 0. 0) This means that inside of an imaginay sphee of adius equal to, the inteaction enegy of the two chages is zeo. Case 1 >. In this case, Eq. 19) yields f 1 ) = 1. 1)
a c tot 013 6 Taking this esult into Eq. 17) we obtain the expected esult U 1 = e 4πǫ 0 d 1 1 = e 4πǫ 0. ) Notice that if we set the uppe limit equal to 10, then a simple calculation shows that U 1 = e 4πǫ 0 10 d 1 1 e = 9 104πǫ 0, 3) that is, as stated in [], 90% of enegy is contained between two sphees, one of adius and the othe one of adius 10. If the chages ae not identical, all we have to do is eplace e by q 1 q. 3 The enegy density distibution Though the final esult is the one we expected the way it was obtained eveals some details that ae somewhat supising, to wit, the pat of the field enegy that coesponds to the inteaction enegy of the two point chages comes fom the egion >. The egion < makes no contibution at all. This conclusion agees with efeence []. How can this physically be? To answe this question we must fist ealize that the electostatic inteaction enegy density of the system is essentially given by the dot poduct of the fields. In the case of two positive identical chages it is not difficult to see that the angle between the fields, let us denote it by α as befoe, is obtuse nea the chages and acute fa away fom them, see Figue. In fact, the negative contibutions comes fom a spheical egion of adius equal to / centeed at the midpoint between the two chages, see Figue. The positive contibution comes fom the est. The volume of the spheical egion is smalle than the volume of the est, but the fields ae moe intense nea the chages than fa away fom them. Theefoe, we conclude that in the end thee is a cancellation between the coesponding contibutions and this is eason why the entie egion < makes no contibution at all to the final esult. The electostatic field enegy of this system comes fom the egion < <. Inside the egion < thee is a suface that sepaates the negative enegy density egion fom the positve one. On this suface the fields ae pependicula to each othe and the enegy density is null. This can be seen fom Eq. 15). The dot poduct between the fields is zeo if and only if 1 = cos θ, 4) but if we inspect Figue this elation is a consequence of Thales theoem that states that any tiangle inscibed in a semicicle is a ight tiangle which is the case of the tiangle fomed by the thee segments of line whose lengths ae 1,, and. It follows easily that on the spheical suface of adius equal to / the fields ae pependicula to each othe and consequently the inteaction enegy is zeo.
a c tot 013 7 E 1 E = 0 suface 1 X q θ 1 =e q =e x 1 x θ Figue 3: Geomety fo the evaluation of the negative enegy density contibution. 4 The atio between negative and positive enegy Let us now evaluate the atio between negative and positive field inteaction enegy. The had pat is the evaluation of the contibution of the negative enegy. In ode to pefom this calculation some geometical tansfomations will have to be made. Conside Figue 3. In ode to shift the oigin of the coodinate system to the midpoint between the chages we intoduce the position vectos of the chages with espect to the midpoint, x 1 andx, such that x 1 +x = 0 and x 1 = x = /. We intoduce also the position vecto X of an abitay point P with espect to the midpoint. Notice that the magnitude X = X of this vecto lies in the inteval 0 X /. The new pola angle isθ and the following vecto elations ae easily seen to hold 1 = x +X; = x +X. 5) The inteaction enegy as befoe depends on the dot poduct e E 1 E = 4πǫ 0 ) 1 e 1 e = 4πǫ 0 ) 1 Fom the vecto elations above it follows that e 1 1. 6) and 1 = 4 +X +X cos θ, = 4 +X X cos θ. We also have 7) 8) 1 X = 4. 1 1 9)
a c tot 013 8 Defining the adimensional vaiable u := X, 0 u 1, 30) the field enegy content of this egion A 1 can be witten as A 1 = U 1 1/ 0 duu u 1 ) 1 dξ 4 0 1 4 +u +uξ ) 3/ 1 4 +u uξ ) 3/, 31) whee ξ := cos θ. The integal in ξ is 1 0 dξ 1 4 +u +uξ ) 3/ 1 4 +u uξ ) 3/ = 64 u 1 u+1)16u 4 +8u +1), 3) and afte pefoming the integal inuwe obtain π A 1 = U 1. 4 In ode to get zeo enegy inside the spheical egion of adius centeed at one of the chages we must have an equal amount of a positive contibution B 1 33) π B 1 = +U 1. 4 Theefoe the atio of the negative enegy to the positive enegy is 34) ) A 1 π = 0.0. 35) U 1 +B 1 π + This means that the negative enegy content is consideable less than the positive enegy one. 5 Final emaks To conclude let us call the eade s attention to two points. The fist one is that if the point chages have opposite algebaic signs then as befoe thee will still be a sphee centeed at one of the chages of adius equal to thei sepaation inside of which the total content of enegy is zeo, but the enegy contained in the smalle sphee of adius/ will be positive and the est of the enegy will be negative. This can be easily seen by sketching the dot poduct E 1 E. The second one is that all calculations done fo the configuation consideed hee mutatis muntandis apply to the coesponding gavitational case. The content of enegy stoed in the gavitational field is given by U = 1 8πG g P)dV, 36)
a c tot 013 9 whee gp) is the esultant field at a point P. Fo a gavitational configuation simila to the electostatic one consideed hee gp) = g 1 P) + g P), and depending on the model we choose fo the mass distibution we will not need to hid infinities due to self-enegies unde the ug. The same can be said about chage distibutions, though hee we dealt with point chages. efeences [1] Pucell E Electicity and Magnetism Bekeley Physics Couse Vol. 1/e See final chapte Futhe Poblems Poblem.30 McGaw-Hill: New Yok) 1965. [] Hilbon C What Should be the ole of Field Enegy in Intoductoy Physics Couse AXiv: 1305.10