A final review session will be offered on Thursday, May 10 from 10AM to 12noon in 521 Cory (the Hogan Room).

Similar documents
EE410 vs. Advanced CMOS Structures

FLCC Seminar. Spacer Lithography for Reduced Variability in MOSFET Performance

A Multi-Gate CMOS Compact Model BSIMMG

Recent Development of FinFET Technology for CMOS Logic and Memory

Multiple Gate CMOS and Beyond

A 20 nm gate-length ultra-thin body p-mosfet with silicide source/drain

Scaling Issues in Planar FET: Dual Gate FET and FinFETs

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

CHAPTER 5 EFFECT OF GATE ELECTRODE WORK FUNCTION VARIATION ON DC AND AC PARAMETERS IN CONVENTIONAL AND JUNCTIONLESS FINFETS

Extending the Era of Moore s Law

Nanometer Transistors and Their Models. Jan M. Rabaey

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

Characteristics Optimization of Sub-10 nm Double Gate Transistors

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

MOSFET: Introduction

MOS Transistor Properties Review

! CMOS Process Enhancements. ! Semiconductor Physics. " Band gaps. " Field Effects. ! MOS Physics. " Cut-off. " Depletion.

Low Frequency Noise in MoS 2 Negative Capacitance Field-effect Transistor

Lecture 5: CMOS Transistor Theory

Proposed Thermal Circuit Model for the Cost Effective Design of Fin FET

There s Plenty of Room at the Bottom and at the Top

The Devices. Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. July 30, 2002

III-V CMOS: What have we learned from HEMTs? J. A. del Alamo, D.-H. Kim 1, T.-W. Kim, D. Jin, and D. A. Antoniadis

How a single defect can affect silicon nano-devices. Ted Thorbeck

Quantum Mechanical Simulation for Ultra-thin High-k Gate Dielectrics Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors

High Mobility Materials and Novel Device Structures for High Performance Nanoscale MOSFETs

Journal of Electron Devices, Vol. 18, 2013, pp JED [ISSN: ]

MOS Transistor Theory

! CMOS Process Enhancements. ! Semiconductor Physics. " Band gaps. " Field Effects. ! MOS Physics. " Cut-off. " Depletion.

Simple and accurate modeling of the 3D structural variations in FinFETs

Application of High-κ Gate Dielectrics and Metal Gate Electrodes to enable Silicon and Non-Silicon Logic Nanotechnology

Lecture 9. Strained-Si Technology I: Device Physics

MOS Transistor I-V Characteristics and Parasitics

Nanoscale CMOS Design Issues

MSE 310/ECE 340: Electrical Properties of Materials Fall 2014 Department of Materials Science and Engineering Boise State University

Homework 2 due on Wednesday Quiz #2 on Wednesday Midterm project report due next Week (4 pages)

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. Lecture 6 MOS Transistors

Semiconductor Physics fall 2012 problems

Modeling and Computation of Gate Tunneling Current through Ultra Thin Gate Oxides in Double Gate MOSFETs with Ultra Thin Body Silicon Channel

CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits. Lecture 03: MOS Transistor

Stretching the Barriers An analysis of MOSFET Scaling. Presenters (in order) Zeinab Mousavi Stephanie Teich-McGoldrick Aseem Jain Jaspreet Wadhwa

Microelectronics Part 1: Main CMOS circuits design rules

Part 5: Quantum Effects in MOS Devices

Lecture 12: MOS Capacitors, transistors. Context

The Future of CMOS. David Pulfrey. CHRONOLOGY of the FET. Lecture Lilienfeld s patent (BG FET) 1965 Commercialization (Fairchild)

Enhanced Mobility CMOS

A Computational Model of NBTI and Hot Carrier Injection Time-Exponents for MOSFET Reliability

Ultimately Scaled CMOS: DG FinFETs?

MOS Transistors. Prof. Krishna Saraswat. Department of Electrical Engineering Stanford University Stanford, CA

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

This article has been accepted and published on J-STAGE in advance of copyediting. Content is final as presented.

Lecture #27. The Short Channel Effect (SCE)

The Critical Role of Quantum Capacitance in Compact Modeling of Nano-Scaled and Nanoelectronic Devices

Lecture 15 OUTLINE. MOSFET structure & operation (qualitative) Review of electrostatics The (N)MOS capacitor

Quarter-micrometre surface and buried channel PMOSFET modelling for circuit simulation

SECTION: Circle one: Alam Lundstrom. ECE 305 Exam 5 SOLUTIONS: Spring 2016 April 18, 2016 M. A. Alam and M.S. Lundstrom Purdue University

ECE-305: Fall 2017 MOS Capacitors and Transistors

Lecture 3: CMOS Transistor Theory

Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. The Devices. July 30, Devices.

Beyond Si: Opportunities and Challenges for CMOS Technology Based on High-Mobility Channel Materials T.P. Ma Yale University

Components Research, TMG Intel Corporation *QinetiQ. Contact:

Investigation of the Dimension Effects of Sub-30nm Multiple-Gate SOI MOSFETs by TCAD Simulation

VLSI Design The MOS Transistor

Semiconductor Physics Problems 2015

CMOS Scaling. Two motivations to scale down. Faster transistors, both digital and analog. To pack more functionality per area. Lower the cost!

Prospects for Ge MOSFETs

Chapter 5 MOSFET Theory for Submicron Technology

Long Channel MOS Transistors

High Dielectric Constant (k) Materials

Recent Progress and Challenges for Relay Logic Switch Technology

ECE 305 Exam 5 SOLUTIONS: Spring 2015 April 17, 2015 Mark Lundstrom Purdue University

Schottky-Barrier Engineering for Low-Resistance Contacts

SOI/SOTB Compact Models

MOSFET SCALING ECE 663

Lecture 15 OUTLINE. MOSFET structure & operation (qualitative) Review of electrostatics The (N)MOS capacitor

Operation and Modeling of. The MOS Transistor. Second Edition. Yannis Tsividis Columbia University. New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

Nanoelectronics. Topics

Glasgow eprints Service

The Devices: MOS Transistors

Feature-level Compensation & Control. Process Integration September 15, A UC Discovery Project

6.012 Electronic Devices and Circuits

Gate Carrier Injection and NC-Non- Volatile Memories

EE130: Integrated Circuit Devices

The Pennsylvania State University. Kurt J. Lesker Company. North Carolina State University. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company 1

Lecture 4: CMOS Transistor Theory

S=0.7 [0.5x per 2 nodes] ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems. Today. Scaling ITRS Roadmap

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Materials Science 11 (2015 )

Courtesy of S. Salahuddin (UC Berkeley) Lecture 4

Comparison of Ultra-Thin InAs and InGaAs Quantum Wells and Ultra-Thin-Body Surface-Channel MOSFETs

Final Examination EE 130 December 16, 1997 Time allotted: 180 minutes

Section 12: Intro to Devices

OMEN an atomistic and full-band quantum transport simulator for post-cmos nanodevices

Performance Analysis of Ultra-Scaled InAs HEMTs

The Devices. Jan M. Rabaey

Tri-Gate Fully-Depleted CMOS Transistors: Fabrication, Design and Layout

III-V field-effect transistors for low power digital logic applications

Carbon Nanotube Electronics

Semiconductor Integrated Process Design (MS 635)

L ECE 4211 UConn F. Jain Scaling Laws for NanoFETs Chapter 10 Logic Gate Scaling

Department of Electronic Engineering, Chienkuo Technology University, No. 1, Chieh Shou N. Rd., Changhua City, 500 Taiwan, R.O.C.

Transcription:

A final review session will be offered on Thursday, May 10 from 10AM to 12noon in 521 Cory (the Hogan Room). The Final Exam will take place from 12:30PM to 3:30PM on Saturday May 12 in 60 Evans.» All of the material of the course will be covered (including HW#14)» Closed book, no calculators; 7 pages of notes allowed. SCORE 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 EE130 QUIZ RESULTS (UG scores only) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Quiz 6 results: Mean = 21.69 Median = 22 Std. Dev. = 1.779 High = 24 Low = 17.5 1

Prof. Tsu-Jae King Liu Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 May 7, 2007

( More of Moore )

The traditional approach to transistor scaling is reaching fundamental limits» oxide scaling» Shallow junctions Source L g Drain» Channel engineering halo doping Issues for scaling L g to below 20 nm:» Leakage SiO 2» Incommensurate gains in I Dsat» V T variation Source Drain A. Brown et al., IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, p. 195, 2002 4

Leakage must be suppressed to scale down L g Leakage occurs in region far from channel surface Let s get rid of it! L g Thin-Body MOSFET Source Drain Buried Oxide Substrate Silicon- on- I nsulator ( SOI ) W afer 5

Leakage is suppressed by using a thin body (T Si < L g )» Channel doping is not needed higher carrier mobility» Aggressive gate-oxide scaling is not needed Double-gate structure is most scalable (to L g <10nm) Ultra-Thin Body (UTB) Double- (DG) L g Source Drain Buried Oxide T Si Source Drain T Si Substrate 6

UTB suppresses leakage Thick S/D => low R series Source SOI SiO 2 Silicon Substrate Drain M. Takamiya et al., Proc. 1997 ISDRS, p. 215 B. Yu et al. (UC Berkeley), Proc. 1997 ISDRS, p. 623 1.E-02 1.E-04 1.E-06 1.E-08 1.E-10 1.E-12 L g = 12 nm T ox = 2 nm Simulated I d -V g V ds =1V Subthreshold swing S (units: mv/dec) T si =8nm T si =6nm T si =4nm 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Voltage [V] 7

Issues for bulk-si MOSFET scaling obviated» Body does not need to be heavily doped» T ox does not need to be scaled as aggressively» Ultra-shallow S/D junction formation is not an issue Body thickness must be less than ~1/3 x L g» Formation of uniformly thin body is primary challenge» For T Si < 4 nm, quantum confinement & interface roughness V T variation and degraded g m K. Uchida et al., IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 47-50, 2002 8

Planar DG-FET FinFET L g L g Drain T Si Source Drain Fin Height H FIN = W/2 Source D. Hisamoto et al. (UC Berkeley), IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 1032-1034, 1998 N. Lindert et al. (UC Berkeley), IEEE Electron Device Letters, pp. 487-489, 2001 Fin Width = T Si 15nm L g FinFET: GATE 20 nm SOURCE DRAIN 10 nm Y.-K. Choi et al. (UC Berkeley), IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 421-424, 2001 9

g Y.-K. Choi et al. (UC Berkeley), IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 421-424, 2001 T Si = 10 nm; T ox = 2.1 nm d 10-2 10-4 10-6 10-8 10-10 10-12 Transfer Characteristics V d =-1.0 V V d =-0.05 V N-body= 2x10 18 cm -3 PMOS P+Si 0.4 Ge 0.6 V d =1.0 V V d =0.05 V NMOS -1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Voltage, V g [V] 10-2 10-4 10-6 10-8 10-10 10-12 d 600 500 400 300 200 100 Output Characteristics PMOS V g -V t =1.2V NMOS Voltage step : 0.2V 0 0-1.5-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Drain Voltage, V d [V] 600 500 400 300 200 100 10

Hole Mobility (100) (110) D D (110) S PMOS (100) S NMOS D Electron Mobility (110) S D S (100) (110) (110) L. Chang et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Vol. 51, p. 1621, 2004 11

g B. Yu et al. (AMD & UC Berkeley), IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 251-254, 2002 Drain Source Poly-Si NiSi 220Å SiO2 cap Si Fin BOX Lg=10nm 12

P. Xuan et al. (UC Berkeley), IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 609-612, 2003 The FinFET is attractive for high-density flash memory FinFET SONOS Device Cross-Section 0 SiO 2 Si 3 N 4 SiO 2 30nm Si SiO 2 Poly-Si 40nm charge-storage layer Measured Retention Characteristics Subsequent publications: M. Specht et al. (Infineon Technologies ), IEDM 2004 C. W. Oh et al. (Samsung Electronics), IEDM 2004 E. S. Cho et al. (Samsung Electronics), Symp. VLSI Technology 2005 13 Threshold voltage (V) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Measured Endurance Behavior (100) device (110) device 0.0 10 100 1k 10k 100k 1M Number of cycles

H. Kam and T.-J. King, Proc. 2004 Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop, pp. 9-10 L g =18nm, L eff = 20nm, W fin =10nm, T ox =5A Top Contact Wrapped Contact Wrapped Contact, zero contact res. 1200 800 400 End Contact Wrapped Contact Top Contact S O G D UR AT R A C E I E N c=10-8 -cm 2 S O UR C E End Contact G AT D R E A I N S O UR C E G AT E D R A I N 0 Vg=0.6V 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Vds (V) Parasitic resistance (& capacitance) will limit the performance of nanoscale CMOS Better FET designs are needed! 14

metallic gate high- gate dielectric L g (nm): 50 40 30 20 10 alternative semiconductor? larger E G, lower r S G Si D strained Si classic al forward body biasing G multi-gate S Si D G Advanced structures will enable Si FET scaling to L g <10 nm» Minimization of parasitics will become the primary challenge 15

J. Wang et al., IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 707-710, 2002 Quantum mechanical tunneling sets a fundamental scaling limit for the channel length L, to ~5 nm. If electrons can easily tunnel through the source-to-channel potential barrier, the gate cannot shut off the transistor. NMOSFET Band Diagram (OFF state) Source Drain E C 16 E C

( More than Moore )

Alternative approaches to» enhance performance and/or functionality» lower power consumption per function can help to reduce cost per function innovative circuit & system design novel semiconductor devices 3-D & heterogeneous integration e.g. with micro-electro-mechanical devices (MEMS), microfluidics alternative approaches to scaling 18 TIME (yrs)

TM Texas Instruments Inc. Mirrors are made using layers of metals (Al alloys) deposited on top of CMOS circuitry SEM image of pixel array Schematic of 2 pixels Each mirror corresponds to a single pixel, programmed by an underlying memory cell to deflect light either into a projection lens or a light absorber. 19

Massive Cluster Gigabit Ethernet Clusters Integration trend for mobile phones wireless sensor network Advantages of MEMS RF filters: small size low power low phase noise high Q MEMS - enabled single-chip radio Timing reference can also be implemented on-chip with MEMS courtesy of Robert Aigner (Infineon Technologies) 20

http://www.ee.duke.edu/research/microfluidics/ An electric field modifies the wetting behavior of a liquid droplet on a surface, by reducing interfacial energy The electric field can be induced by applying a voltage across 2 electrodes sandwiching the droplet If an electric field is applied non-uniformly, then a surface-energy gradient is created, which causes the droplet to move 21

R. B. Fair et al., IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 779-782, 2003 Multiple control electrodes can be used to manipulate droplets across a surface under direct electrical control 22» No pumps, valves, channels needed» Units of fluid can be transported, stored, mixed, reacted, or analyzed using a sequence of electrode voltage combinations. Electrowetting arrays are promising for highly integrated and automated lab-on-a-chip systems!

Bulk-Si MOSFET Source Substrate L eff L g X j (~1970 to present) Drain N sub Opportunities remain for innovations to» reduce power per function (e.g. novel devices)» lower system cost (e.g. integrated system on chip)» increase system functionality T ox CMOS scaling will continue with advances in» transistor design» fabrication techniques» materials scaling to L g < 20 nm (beyond 2010) Investment (e.g. heterogeneous integration of III-V devices, M/NEMS, CNTs, molecular devices, etc.) 24 Multi- MOSFET 1 Source Market Growth Drain 2 Technology, Device & Circuit Innovations, Heterogeneous Integration Lower Power, Lower Cost