arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 17 Oct 2017
|
|
- Geoffrey Goodwin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ON -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 17 Oct 2017 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH Abstract. Let D be an integral domain and a star operation defined on D. We say that D is a -power conductor domain ( -PCD) if for each pair a,b D\(0) and for each positive integer n we have Da n Db n = ((Da Db) n ). We study -PCDs and characterize them as root closed domains satisfying ((a,b) n ) 1 = (((a,b) 1 ) n ) for all nonzero a,b and all natural numbers n 1. From this it follows easily that Prüfer domains are d-pcds (where d denotes the trivial star operation), and v-domains (e.g., Krull domains) are v-pcds. We also consider when a -PCD is completely integrally closed, and this leads to new characterizations of Krulll domains. In particular, we show that a Noetherian domain is a Krull domain if and only if it is a w-pcd. introduction Let D be an integral domain with quotient field K. For a,b D \(0) and n a positive integer, it is clear that Da n Db n (Da Db) n, and it is elementary that we have equality (for all a,b,n) if D is a GCD-domain (e.g., a UFD) or a Prüfer domain. On the other hand, Krull domains, even integrally closed Noetherian domains, may allow Da n Db n (Da Db) n for some nonzero a,b and n > 1 (see [3, Section 3]). However, recalling the v-operation on the domain D, given by A v = (D : (D : A)) for nonzero fractional ideals A of D and letting D be a Krull domain, we do have Da n Db n = ((Da Db) n ) v for all nonzero a,b D and n 1. Now the v-operation is an example of a star operation. We recall the definition: DenotingbyF(D)thesetofnonzerofractionalidealsofD,amap : F(D) F(D) is a star operation if the following conditions hold for all A,B F(D) and all c K \(0): (1) (ca) = ca and D = D; (2) A A, and, if A B, then A B ; and (3) A = A. The most frequently used star operations (as well as the most important for our purposes) are the d-operation, given, for A F(D), by A d = A; the v-operation, definedabove;thet-operation,givenbya t = B v,wheretheunionistakenoverall nonzero finitely generated fractional subideals B of A; and the w-operation, given by A w = {x K xb A for some finitely generated ideal B of D with B v = D}. For any staroperation on D, we haved v, in the sense that A = A d A A v for all nonzero fractional ideals A of D. Other basic properties of -operations may be found in [11, Sections 32, 34] (but we do review much of what we use in the sequel). Date: July 24, MSC 2010: 13A05, 13A15, 13E05, 13F05, 13G05. Key words: Star operation, Prüfer domain, Krull domain, completely integrally closed domain. The second-named author was supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (#354565). 1
2 2 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH For a star operation on D, we say that D is a -power conductor domain ( -PCD) if Da n Db n = ((Da Db) n ) for all a,b D \ (0) and all positive integers n. (The reason for the conductor terminology will become clear after Definition 1.2 and Proposition 1.3 below.) As mentioned above, examples of d- PCDs include GCD-domains and Prüfer domains, while Krull domains are v-pcds. In Section 1, as a consequence of Theorem 1.6, we show that essential domains, i.e., domains possessing a family P of prime ideals with D = P P D P with each D P a valuation domain, are v-pcds. We also show (Proposition 1.11) that if D is a -PCD, then D must be root closed and that for each maximal ideal M of D, we must havem invertible, M 1 = D, orm = (M 2 ). This leads to acharacterization of -PCDs as root closed domains D satisfying ((a,b) n ) 1 = (((a,b) 1 ) n ) for all nonzero a, b D. This latter condition is obviously a weakened form of invertibility; indeed, as an easy corollary we obtain that so-called -Prüfer domains, domains D inwhicheachnonzerofinitelygeneratedidealasatisfies(aa 1 ) = D, are -PCDs. Section 2 presents examples of the subtleties involved. Among others, we give examples of d-pcds that are not integrally closed and hence not essential, v-pcds that are not d-pcds, and v-pcds with non-v-pcd localizations. In Section 3 we study complete integral closure in v-pcds and give several new characterizations of Krull domains. For example, we show that D is a Krull domain if and only if D is a v-pcd in which v-invertible ideals are t-invertible and n=1 (Mn ) v = (0) for each maximal t-ideal M of D. In Section 4 we study two notions that have appeared previously in the literature and that are closely related to the d-pcd property. We also study w-pcds and show that a Noetherian domain is a Krull domain if and only if it is a w-pcd. Finally we characterize Krull domains as w-pcds in which maximal t-ideals M are divisorial and satisfy n=1 (Mn ) w = (0). There are (at least) two rather natural ways to weaken the -PCD notion (see Definition 1.1). We show that the three notions are distinct and, where possible (and convenient), prove results in somewhat greater generality than described above. We use the following notational conventions: The term local requires a ring to have a unique maximal ideal but does not require it to be Noetherian; denotes proper inclusion; and for fractional ideals A,B of D, (A : B) = {x K xa B}, while (A : D B) = {d D da B}. 1. Weak -PCDs Throughout this section, D denotes a domain and K its quotient field. We begin with our basic definition(s). Definition 1.1. Let be a star operation on D and n a positive integer. We say that a pair a,b D \(0) satisfies n if Da n Db n = ((Da Db) n ). We then say that D (1) is a weak -PCD if for each pair a,b D \(0) there is an integer m > 1, depending on a,b, such that a,b satisfies m ; (2) satisfies n if each pair of nonzero elements of D satisfies n ; (3) is a -PCD if D satisfies n for each n 1. With the notation above, since the ideal Da n Db n is divisorial and hence a - ideal, it is clear that the inclusion Da n Db n ((Da Db) n ) holds automatically. Of course, we have equality when n = 1. It is also clear that for any n > 1, D is
3 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 3 a -PCD D satisfies n D is a weak -PCD. In Example 2.4 below, we show that these notions are distinct when is d or v. For x,y D \ {0}, we have xy(x,y) 1 = xy(dx 1 Dy 1 ) = Dx Dy = Dx(D D(y/x)) = Dx(Dx : D Dy) = Dx(D : D D(y/x)). Hence for a,b D \(0), u = b/a, a star operation on D, and n 1, we have (using the fact that we may cancel nonzero principal ideals in equations involving star operations) Da n Db n = ((Da Db) n ) (Da n : D Db n ) = ((Da : D Db) n ) (D : D Du n ) = ((D : D Du) n ) (a n,b n ) 1 = (((a,b) 1 ) n ). Motivated by this, we state the next definition and proposition. Definition 1.2. Let be a star operation on D and n a positive integer. We say that an element u K \ (0) satisfies n if (D : D Du n ) = ((D : D Du) n ) (equivalently, (1,u n ) 1 = (((1,u) 1 ) n ) ). Proposition 1.3. Let a,b D\(0), u = b/a, and n 1. The following statements are equivalent: (1) The pair a,b satisfies n. (2) The element u satisfies n. (3) (a n,b n ) 1 = (((a,b) 1 ) n ). A consequence of the next result is that if D is a -PCD for any, then D is a v-pcd. Lemma 1.4. Let be star operations on D, a,b D \(0), and n 1. (1) If a,b satisfies n, then a,b also satisfies n. (Equivalently, if u K \(0) satisfies n, then u also satisfies n.). (2) If D is a weak -PCD (satisfies n, is a -PCD), then D is a weak -PCD, (satisfies n, is a -PCD). (3) If D is a weak -PCD (satisfies n, is a -PCD), then D is a weak v-pcd (satisfies v n, is a v-pcd). Proof. (1) Assume that a,b D\(0) satisfies n for some n. Then (Da n Db n ) = ((Da Db) n ) ((Da Db) n ) Da n Db n (since Da n Db n is divisorial and hence automatically a -ideal). Statement (2) follows from (1), and (3) follows from (2).. Proposition 1.5. Let D be a domain, and let a,b D \ (0). Then a,b satisfies m for some m > 1 if and only if there is a sequence 1 < n 1 < n 2 < such that a,b satisfies ni for each i. Hence D is a weak -PCD if and only if for each pair a,b D \(0), there is a sequence 1 < n 1 < n 2 < such that a,b satisfies ni for each i. Proof. ( ) Clear. ( ) We have Da n1 Db n1 = ((Da Db) n1 ) for some n 1 > 1. Suppose 1 < n 1 < < n k have been chosen so that Da ni Db ni = ((Da Db) ni ) for i = 1,...,k. Choose n > 1 so that (Da n k ) n (Db n k ) n = ((Da n k Db n k ) n ). Put n k+1 = n k n. Then as desired. Da n k+1 Db n k+1 = (Da n k ) n (Db n k ) n = ((Da n k Db n k ) n ) = ((((Da Db) n k ) ) n ) = ((Da Db) n kn ) = ((Da Db) n k+1 ),
4 4 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH Recall that if D R is an extension of domains, then R is said to be LCM-stable over D if (Da Db)R = Ra Rb, for each a,b D, equivalently, if (D : D Du)R = (R : R Ru) for each u K \D. (LCM-stability was introduced by R. Gilmer [12] and popularized by H. Uda [20, 21].) Each flat overring of D is LCM-stable over D. Now let {D α } α A be a family of overrings of D with D = α A D α, and for each α A, let α be a star operation on D α. For a nonzero fractional ideal I of D, set I = α A (ID α) α. Then is a star operation on D [1]. Theorem 1.6. Let {D α } α A be a family of LCM-stable overrings of D with D = α A D α, and for each α A, let α be a star operation on D α. Let n 1, and let u be a nonzero element of K such that u satisfies ( α ) n for each α. Then u satisfies n (where is the star operation defined above). In particular, u satisfies v n. Proof. We have (D : D Du n ) α (D α : Dα D α u n ) = α ((D α : Dα D α u) n ) α = (((D : D Du) n )D α ) α = ((D : D Du) n ). α The in particular statement follows from Lemma 1.4. Recall that the domaind issaid tobe essential ifd = P P D P forsomefamily P of primes of D with each D P a valuation domain. Since valuation domains are d-pcds and localizations are LCM-stable, the next two results are immediate. Corollary 1.7. An essential domain D is a v-pcd. Corollary 1.8. Let n 1. If D M satisfies v n for each maximal ideal M of D, then D satisfies v n. In particular, if each D M is a v-pcd, then D is a v-pcd. The converses of both of these are false see Examples 2.4(4) and 2.6 below. But the d-pcd property holds if and only if it holds locally: Corollary 1.9. Let n 1. The following statements are equivalent. (1) D satisfies d n. (2) D S satisfies d n for each multiplicatively closed subset S of D. (3) D P satisfies d n for each prime ideal P of D. (4) D M satisfies d n for each maximal ideal M of D. The statements remain equivalent if satisfies d n is replaced by is a d-pcd. Proof. Assume that D M satisfies d n for each maximal ideal M of D. By Theorem 1.6, D satisfies n for the star operation given by A = M Max(D) AD M. However, = d in this case. Hence (4) (1). Now assume that D satisfies d n, let S be a multiplicatively closed subset of D, and let u K \ (0). Then (D S : DS D S u n ) = (D : D Du n )D S = (D : D Du) n D S = (D S : DS D S u) n. This gives (1) (2). The other implications are trivial. In orderto get the v-pcd propertyto passto quotient rings, we need a finiteness condition. Recall that D is said to be v-coherent if I 1 is a v-ideal of finite type for each nonzero finitely generated I of D. Obviously, Noetherian domains are v- coherent. More generally, Mori domains, domains satisfying the ascending chain condition on divisorial ideals, are v-coherent.
5 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 5 Corollary Let D be a v-coherent domain and n 1. Then the following statements are equivalent. (1) D satisfies v n. (2) D S satisfies v n for every multiplicatively closed subset S of D. (3) D P satisfies v n for every prime ideal P of D. (4) D M satisfies v n for every maximal ideal M of D. (5) D M satisfies v n for every maximal t-ideal M of D. (6) There is a family P = {P} of prime ideals of D such that D = P P D P and D P satisfies v n for every P P. The statements remain equivalent if satisfies v n is replaced by is a v-pcd. Proof. Let n > 1 and u K \ (0). Assume that u satisfies v n, and let S be a multiplicatively closed subset of D. According to [6, Lemma 2.5], if A is a v-ideal of finite type in the v-coherent domain D, then A v D S = (AD S ) vs (where v S is the v-operation on D S ). Using this, we have (D S : DS D S u n ) = (D : D Du n )D S = ((D : D Du) n ) v D S = ((D : D Du) n D S ) vs = ((D S : DS D S u) n ) vs. The implication (1) (2) follows. Implications (2) (3) (4) (6) and (3) (5) (6) are trivial. Finally, (6) (1) by Theorem 1.6. In Corollary 1.9 the existence of a family P = {P} of prime ideals of D such that D = P P D P and D P is a d-pcd does not suffice to conclude that D is a d-pcd: A Krull domain D obviously has the property that D P is a d-pcd for each maximal t-ideal P of D, but such a D is a d-pcd if and only if each P n is divisorial, and a Krull domain need not have this property ([3, comment following Lemma 3.7]). (We revisit this in Section 4 below.) We shall make frequent use of the next result. For rings R S and a positive integer n, we say that R is n-root closed in S if u S \R implies u n / R, and we say that the domain D is n-root closed if D is n-root closed in K. Proposition Let D be a domain, and let be a star operation on D. (1) If u K \D satisfies n, then u n / D. (2) If D is a weak -PCD and M is a maximal ideal of D, then M must satisfy one of the following conditions: (a) M is invertible. (b) M 1 = D. (c) M = (M 2 ). (3) If D satisfies n for some n > 1 (is a -PCD), then D is n-root closed (is root closed), and each maximal ideal of D must satisfy one of the conditions above. Proof. (1) Let u K \ D, and assume that u satisfies n, n > 1. Then (D : D Du n ) = ((D : D Du) n ) (D : D Du) = (D : D Du) D. (The last equality follows since (D : D Du) is divisorial and hence a -ideal.) (2) Assume that D is a weak -PCD, let M be a maximal ideal of D, and assume that M 1 D and that M is not invertible. We may then find u M 1 \D, and we have M = (D : D Du). By hypothesis, u satisfies n for some n > 1. Since M is not invertible, we must have Mu M, whence Mu n M. By (1), u n / D, and hence M = (D : D Du n ) = ((D : D Du) n ) = (M n ). It then follows rather easily that M = (M 2 ) : M = (M n ) (M 2 ) M = ((M n ) ) = (M n ) = M.
6 6 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH (3) This follows from (1) and (2). Next, we characterize (n-)root closed domains. Proposition1.12. For n 1, adomain D is n-rootclosed if and onlyif (1,u n ) 1 = ((1,u) n ) 1 for all u K (equivalently, (a n,b n ) 1 = ((a,b) n ) 1 for all nonzero a,b D). Proof. Assume that D is an n-root closed domain, and let u K. Since (1,u n ) (1,u) n, we have (1,u n ) 1 ((1,u) n ) 1. Let r (1,u n ) 1, that is, let r,ru n D. Then for 1 k n, we have (ru k ) n = r n k (ru n ) k D, and, since D is n-root closed, we obtain ru k D. Hence r ((1,u) n ) 1, as desired. Conversely, assume (1,u n ) 1 = ((1,u) n ) 1 for each u K. Then if u n D, the left side of the equation is equal to D, and the right side then puts u D. For u K, we always have (1,u n ) 1 ((1,u) n ) 1 (((1,u) 1 ) n ) for any star operation. It follows that u satisfies n if and only if both inclusions are equalities. If we combine this observation with Proposition 1.12, we obtain the following characterization of the -PCD property. Theorem A domain D satisfies n if and only if it is n-root closed and ((1,u) n ) 1 = (((1,u) 1 ) n ) for each u K. Hence D is a -PCD if and only if D is root closed and ((1,u) n ) 1 = (((1,u) 1 ) n ) for each u K and n 1. (Equivalently, D is a -PCD if and only if D is root closed and ((a,b) n ) 1 = (((a,b) 1 ) n ) for all nonzero a,b D and n 1.) Proof. If D is n-root closed and satisfies the given equality, then (D : D Du n ) = (1,u n ) 1 = ((1,u) n ) 1 = (((1,u) 1 ) n ) = ((D : D Du) n ). Conversely, if D satisfies n, then D is n-root closed, and ((1,u) n ) 1 = (1,u n ) 1 = (D : D Du n ) = ((D : D Du) n ) = (((1,u) 1 ) n ). Let be a star operation on D, and let A be a nonzero fractional ideal of D. Then A is said to be -invertible if (AA 1 ) = D. It is well-known (and easy to show) that if A is -invertible and (AB) = D for some fractional ideal B, then we must have B = A 1 ; furthermore, if n is a positive integer and we apply this fact to the equation (A n (A 1 ) n ) = D, we also have (A n ) 1 = ((A 1 ) n ). We use this equality in the following theorem. (Note that while the equality holds for -invertible ideals, it fails in general as we point out in Example 3.5 below.) Theorem Let be a star operation on D, let u K \ (0), and assume that the fractional ideal (1,u) is -invertible. Then u satisfies n for each n 1. (Equivalently, if a,b D \(0) are such that (a,b) is -invertible, then the pair a,b satisfies n for each n 1.) Proof. Begin with the equality (1,u) 2n = (1,u) n (1,u n ). Multiplying by ((1,u) 1 ) n and taking s yields((1,u) n ) = (1,u n ). Takinginversesthen yields ((1,u) n ) 1 = (1,u n ) 1, and combining this with the above-mentioned equality (with A = (1,u)), we have (1,u n ) 1 = (((1,u) 1 ) n ). This latter equation is equivalent to u satisfies n. We have the following corollary to (the proof of) Theorem Corollary Let be a star operation on D, let u K \(0), and assume that the fractional ideal (1,u) is -invertible. Then (1,u n ) = ((1,u) n ). ( Equivalently, if a,b D \(0) are such that (a,b) is -invertible, then (a n,b n ) = ((a,b) n ) ).
7 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 7 If each nonzero finitely generated ideal of D is -invertible, then D is said to be a -Prüfer domain [2]. (Thus a v-prüfer domain is a v-domain.) Thus the next result is immediate from Theorem Corollary A -Prüfer domain is a -PCD. In particular, a v-domain is a v-pcd. It is well known that essential domains are v-domains; hence Corollary 1.16 strengthens Corollary 1.7. Since a v-pcd need not be integrally closed (see Example 2.4 below), the converse of Corollary 1.16 is false. Recall [11, Section 32] that to any star operation on D, we may associate a star operation f given by A f = B, where the union is taken over all nonzero finitely generated subideals B of A. If is a star operation on D and = f (i.e., is of finite type), it is well known that (1) each nonzero element a of D is contained in a maximal -ideal, (2) D = D P, where the intersection is taken over all maximal -ideals P of D, and (3) primes minimal over a nonzero element are -ideals. When = v, f is the well-studied t-operation. Finally, recall that a Prüfer -multiplication domain (P MD) is a domain in which each nonzero finitely generated ideal is f -invertible. Put another way, a P MD is a -Prüfer domain D in which A 1 is a finite-type -ideal for each nonzero finitely generated ideal A of D. (A -ideal I has finite type if I = J for some finitely generated subideal J of I.) Corollary A P MD is a -PCD. In particular, PvMDs are v-pcds. A domain D is called an almost GCD-domain (AGCD-domain) if for each pair a,b D \ (0) there is a positive integer n for which Da n Db n is principal [24]. We end this section by showing that within this class of domains, a v-pcd must be essential. Proposition For an AGCD domain D the following are equivalent. (1) D is a PvMD. (2) D is essential. (3) D is a v-domain. (4) D is a v-pcd. (5) D is root closed. (6) D is integrally closed. Proof. Implications (1) (2) (3) are well known. For the rest, (3) (4) by Corollary 1.16, (4) (5) by Proposition 1.11, (5) (6) by [24, Theorem 3.1], and (6) (1) by [24, Corollary 3.8]. 2. Pullbacks and examples Let T be a domain, M a maximal ideal of T, ϕ : T k := T/M the natural projection, and D a proper subring of k. Then let R = ϕ 1 (D), that is, let R be the domain arising from the following pullback of canonical homomorphisms. R T D ϕ T/M = k
8 8 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH Since R and T share a nonzero ideal, they have a common quotient field, which, throughout this section, will be denoted by K. Lemma 2.1. In the diagram above, assume that D is a field and that T = (M : M). Let n > 1. Then: (1) R satisfies d n if and only if T satisfies d n, M = M 2, and D is n-root closed in k. (2) Suppose that T satisfies v n locally, (T M : MT M ) = T M, D is n-root closed in k, and for each nonzero u K, if (T M : TM T M u n ) is principal in T M, then (T M : TM T M u) is also principal. Then R satisfies v n. Proof. (1) We begin by assuming that T is local with maximal ideal M. We claim that if u K is such that u,u 1 / T, then (R : R Ru) = (T : T Tu). To verify this, suppose that t T satisfies tu T. Then t M R since u / T, and tu M R since t(tu) 1 = u 1 / T. The claim follows easily. Now assume that R satisfies d n. It is clear that M cannot be invertible in R and also that M 1 R. Hence M = M 2 by Proposition Suppose that t T satisfies ϕ(t) n D. Then t n R, whence t R and then ϕ(t) D. Hence D is n-root closed in k. We next show that T is n-root closed. For this, suppose that u K \ T and u n T. We cannot have u n R since R is n-root closed (Proposition 1.11). Hence M = (R : R Ru n ) = (R : R Ru) n M n = M. It follows that (R : R Ru) = M, whence u M 1 = (M : M) = T. Hence T is n-root closed. Finally, let y K\T. Then y n / T. If y 1 T, then (T : T Ty n ) = T(y n ) = (T : T Ty) n. If y 1 / T, then from the claim above, we have (T : T Ty n ) = (R : R Ry n ) = (R : R Ry) n = (T : T Ty) n. Therefore, T satisfies d n. For the converse, assume that T satisfies d n with M = M 2 and D n-root closed in k, and let u K \ R. First suppose that u T. It is easy to see that D n-root closed in k implies that R is n-root closed in T and hence that u n / R. We then have (R : R Ru n ) = M = M n = (R : R Ru) n. Now suppose that u / T. If u 1 R, then (R : R Ru n ) = Ru n = (R : R Ru) n, as desired. If u 1 / R, then u 1 / T (lest u 1 M R). In this case (again using the claim above), we have (R : R Ru n ) = (T : T Tu n ) = (T : T Tu) n = (R : R Ru) n. Hence R satisfies d n. This proves (1) in local case. For the general case, note that each maximal ideal of R is of the form N R, where N is a maximal ideal of T, and, for N M, R N R = T N (see, e.g., [10, Theorem 1.9]). Localizing the diagram at M yields that R M satisfies d n if and only if T M satisfies d n, M = M 2, and D is n-root closed in k. The general case now follows easily from Corollary 1.9. For (2), note that (R : M 2 ) = ((R : M) : M) = (T : M) = T, whence (M 2 ) v = T 1 = M. Also, as above, R is n-rootclosed in T. Nowsuppose that T is local, and let u K \R. If u T, then u n T \R and (R : R Ru n ) = M = (M n ) v = ((R : R Ru) n ) v. Suppose that u / T. If u 1 R, proceed as before. Assume u 1 / R and hence (see above) that u 1 / T. Even so, it is possible that (T : T Tu) = Tx for some x T. In this case, we have (R : R Ru n ) = (T : T Tu n ) = ((T : T Tu) n ) vt = (Tx) n = (T : T Tu) n = (R : R Ru) n. Finally, suppose that (T : T Tu) is not principal. At thispoint, it ishelpful to observethatif Ais anon-principalfractional ideal of T, then (A is a fractional ideal of R and) A 1 = (M : A) = (T : A). In particular,(r : R Ru) 1 = (T : (T : T Tu)). Byhypothesis,wehave(T : T Tu n )nonprincipal, and, as before, (R : R Ru n ) = (T : T Tu n ). By the observation, this yields (R : R Ru n ) 1 = (T : (T : T Tu n )) = (T : (T : T Tu) n ). Then, since (T : T Tu) n is
9 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 9 not principal and is equal to (R : R Ru) n, we have (R : R Ru n ) 1 = ((R : R Ru) n ) 1, whence(r : R Ru n ) = (R : R Ru n ) v = ((R : R Ru) n ) v,asdesired. Thiscompletesthe proof of the local case. An easy localization argument, together with Corollary 1.8, then yields the general case. Consider the generic pullback diagram above, and assume that k is the quotient field of D. An easy calculation, or an appeal to [9, Proposition 1.8], yields the following facts: For t T, (D : D Dϕ(t)) = ϕ(r : R Rt) and ϕ 1 (D : D Dϕ(t)) = (R : R Rt). We use these in the next result. Theorem 2.2. In the diagram above, assume that T = (M : M), and let n > 1. Then R satisfies d n if and only if T,D both satisfy d n, D is n-root closed in k, and at least one of the following holds: M = M 2 or k is the quotient field of D. Proof. The case where D is a field is handled by Lemma 2.1. Suppose that D is not a field but that k is the quotient field of D, and assume that R satisfies d n. Then each localization of T at a maximal ideal agrees with a localization of R, and hence T satisfies d n by Corollary 1.9. Now let t T \R. From the remarks above, we have (D : D Dϕ(t) n ) = ϕ(r : R Rt n ) = ϕ((r : R Rt) n ) = (D : D Dϕ(t)) n. Hence D satisfies d n. Note that D is automatically n-root closed in k since it satisfies d n. For the converse, suppose that P is a maximal ideal of R. If P is incomparable to M, then P = N R for some maximal ideal N of T, and hence R P = T N satisfies d n. If P M, then, localization produces the following pullback diagram: R P D ϕ(p) T M ϕ T/M = k At this point, for the remainder of this part of the proof, we change notation and assume that D and T are local with maximal ideals ϕ(p) and M, respectively. Let u K. If u T, then (R : R Ru n ) = ϕ 1 (D : D Dϕ(u) n ) = ϕ 1 ((D : D ϕ(u)) n ) = (R : R Ru) n, as required. If u / T but u 1 R, then (R : R Ru n ) = Ru n = (R : R Ru) n. If u 1 / R, then u 1 / T, and it is easy to see that (R : R Ru n ) = (T : T Tu n ) = (T : T Tu) n = (R : R Ru) n. Therefore, R satisfies d n. Finally (and switching back to the original notation), assume that D is not a field andthat the quotientfield F ofd is properlycontainedin k. Let S := ϕ 1 (F). If R satisfies d n, then by what was proved in the preceding paragraph, S satisfies d n and (hence) D is n-root closed in F. Lemma 2.1 then yields that T satisfies d n, M = M 2, and that F is n-root closed in k; it follows that D is n-root closed in k. For the converse, assume that D and T satisfy d n, D is n-root closed in k, and M = M 2. To see that F is n-root closed in k, let x k with x n F. Write x n = d/e with d,e D. Then (ex) n = e n 1 ex n D, whence ex D, and we have x F, as desired. Lemma 2.1 then ensures that S satisfies d n, and then the preceding paragraph yields that R satisfies d n. Recall that a local domain (R,M) is a pseudo-valuation domain (PVD) if M 1 is a valuation domain with maximal ideal M [15]; V is then called the canonical valuation overring of R. It follows that a domain R is a PVD if and only if it is a pullback of the type in Lemma 2.1 with T a valuation domain [5, Proposition 2.6]. We specialize Lemma 2.1 to PVDs:
10 10 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH Corollary 2.3. Let (R,M) be a PVD with canonical valuation overring V = M 1, and assume that R V. Then: (1) The following statements are equivalent. (a) R is a weak v-pcd. (b) M = M 2. (c) R is a weak d-pcd. (2) If n > 1, the following statements are equivalent. (a) R satisfies v n. (b) R is n-root closed (equivalently, R/M is n-root closed in V/M) and M = M 2. (c) R satisfies d n. (3) The following statements are equivalent. (a) R is a v-pcd. (b) R is root closed and M = M 2. (c) R is a d-pcd. Proof. (1) Assume that R is a weak v-pcd, and choose x V \ R. Then (R : R Rx) = M. For some integer k, we must have (R : R Rx k ) = ((R : R Rx) k ) v. If x k R, this equality becomes R = (M k ) v, which is impossible since M is divisorial in R. Hence x k / R, in which case the equality above becomes M = (M k ) v. This then yields M = (M 2 ) v, whence V = M 1 = (M 2 ) 1 = ((R : M) : M) = (V : M). It follows that M cannot be principal in the valuation domain V, whence M = M 2. Thus (a) (b). Now assume that M = M 2, and let y K\R. If y 2,y 3 R, then (y 2 )y = y 3 R, whence y 2 M. However, since y V, this puts y M R, a contradiction. Therefore, for m = 2 or m = 3, y m / R, whence (R : R Ry m ) = M = M m = (R : R Ry) m, as desired. Finally, suppose y / V. Then y 1 M R, whence for all s > 1, we have (R : R Ry s ) = Ry s = (R : R Ry) s. This gives (b) (c), and (c) (a) follows from Lemma 1.4. (2) Assume that R satisfies v n. Then R is n-root closed by Proposition 1.11, and M = M 2 by (1). The implication (b) (c) follows from Lemma 2.1(1), and (c) (a) is trivial (Lemma 1.4). (3) This follows from (2). Next, we present examples, several of which were promised above. We begin with PVD examples, where the conclusions are immediate from Corollary 2.3. Example 2.4. Let (R,M) be a PVD with canonical valuation overring V. Then: (1) If M M 2, then R is not a weak v-pcd (Corollary 2.3). For example, take R = F +xk[x] xk[x], where F k are fields and x is an indeterminate; if, in addition, [k : F] <, then R is Noetherian. (2) If M = M 2, but R is not n-root closed for any n > 1, then R is a weak d-pcd but does not satisfy v n for any n > 1. (For example, let k be an algebraic closure of Q, let V = k+m be a non-discrete rank-one valuation domain with maximal ideal M, and let R = Q+M.) (3) If M = M 2 and R is 2-root closed but not 3-root closed (e.g., take V = F 4 +M to be a rank-one non-discrete valuation domain with maximal ideal M, and let R = F 2 +M), then R satisfies d 2 but is not a v-pcd. (4) If M = M 2 and R is root closed, then R is a d-pcd. (a) If R/M is not algebraically closed in V/M, then R is not integrally closed. (For example, take R/M = Q and V/M = Q[u], where u is a
11 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 11 root of x 3 3x+1.) Hence a d-pcd need not be integrally closed and hence need not be an essential domain (or even a v-domain). (b) If R/M is algebraically closed in V/M, then R is a d-pcd that is integrally closed but not completely integrally closed. Let F k be fields, X a set of indeterminates, M the maximal ideal of k[x] generated by X, and put R = F + Xk[X]. Such rings have often been used to provide interesting examples. We investigate PCD-properties in these rings. Example 2.5. With the notation above, assume that F root closed in k. (1) Let X = 1. Then: (a) R is not a d-pcd by Lemma 2.1. In fact, observe that in this case R M is a PVD that is not a weak v-pcd by Example 2.4. Then, since R is v-coherent (see, e.g. [10, Theorem 3.5]), Corollary 1.10 ensures that R is not even a weak v-pcd. (b) If F is algebraically closed in k, then R is an integrally closed domain that is not a weak v-pcd. (2) If X > 1, then k[x] satisfies the hypotheses of Lemma 2.1(2). Hence R is a v-pcd but not a weak d-pcd by Proposition (3) If in (2) we take 1 < X < and [k : F] <, then R is a Noetherian v-pcd that is not a weak d-pcd. Next, we give an example showing that the v-pcd property does not localize. Example 2.6. Let R be the example given by Heinzer [14]. The domain R is essential, and therefore a v-pcd, but contains a prime ideal P such that R P is not essential. In fact, it is easy to see that R P is a PVD with P P 2. Hence R P is not a (weak) v-pcd by Corollary 2.3(1). 3. Completely integrally closed v-pcds In this and the next section we return to our convention that D is a domain with quotient field K. Recall that D is completely integrally closed if whenever u K and a is a nonzero element of D with au n D for all n 1, then u D. Thus the domain D is completely integrally closed if and only if n=1 (D : D Du n ) = (0) for each u K \D. It is well-known that D is completely integrally closed if and only if each nonzero ideal of D is v-invertible. We begin with a characterization of completely integrally closed -PCDs. Proposition 3.1. Let D be a weak -PCD. Then (1) n=1 (D : D Du n ) = n=1 ((D : D Du) n ) for each u K \(0). (2) D is completely integrally closed if and only if n=1 ((D : D Du) n ) = (0) for each u K \D. Proof. (1) Let u K \(0), and use Proposition 1.5 to choose 1 < n 1 < n 2 with (D : D Du ni ) = ((D : D Du) ni ) for each i. Then (D : D Du n ) (D : D Du ni ) = ((D : D Du) ni ) = ((D : D Du) n ), n=1 i=1 i=1 and (1) follows easily. (2) By definition D is completely integrally closed if and only if n=1 (D : D Du n ) = (0) for each u K \D. Hence the conclusion follows from (1). n=1
12 12 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH Combining the proposition with Corollary 1.16, we have: Corollary 3.2. A -Prüfer domain D is completely integrally closed if and only if n=1 ((D : D Du) n ) = (0) for each u K \D. In particular, a v-domain (and hence an essential domain or a PvMD) is completely integrally closed if and only if n=1 ((D : D Du) n ) v = (0) for each u K \D. Proposition 3.3. A weak -PCD D is completely integrally closed if for every maximal f -ideal P of D we have n=1 (Pn ) = (0). In particular, a weak d-pcd (weak v-pcd) D is completely integrally closed if for every maximal ideal (maximal t-ideal) P of D we have n=1 Pn = (0) ( n=1 (Pn ) v = (0)). Proof. Let D be a weak -PCD, and let u K\D. Then (D : D Du) P for some maximal f -ideal P of D, and hence ((D : D Du) n ) (P n ). The conclusion then follows from Proposition 3.1. The condition on the maximal t-ideals in Proposition 3.3 is quite stringent. In particular, the condition requires a maximal t-ideal P to satisfy P v D. Counterexamples to the converse of Proposition 3.3 abound. For example, a non-discrete rank one valuation domain (D,M) is a v-pcd and completely integrally closed but does not satisfy (M n ) v = (0); in fact, (M n ) v = D for each n. For another example, D = k[x,y], k a field and x,y indeterminates, is a completely integrally closed v-pcd, but (x,y) v = D. On the other hand, if we require even more, we can obtain interesting characterizations of Krull domains. Note that if for a maximal t-ideal P we have (P n ) v = (0), then P v D and hence P v = P, that is, P is divisorial. In [13] Glaz and Vasconselos called a domain D an H-domain if each ideal I of D with I v = D contains a finitely generated ideal J with J v = D. According to [16, Proposition 2.4], the domain D is an H-domain if and only if every maximal t-ideal of D is divisorial. It is also easy to see that D is an H-domain if and only every v-invertible ideal of D is t-invertible. In particular, if an H-domain D is a v-domain, it must be a PvMD. Finally, Glaz and Vasconcelos showed that a domain D is a Krull domain if and only if it is a completely integrally closed H-domain [13, 3.2(d)]. Corollary 3.4. The following are equivalent for a domain D. (1) D is a Krull domain. (2) D is a completely integrally closed H-domain. (3) D is an H-domain and a v-domain with t-dimension one. (4) D is an H-domain and a PvMD with t-dimension one. (5) D is an H-domain and a v-pcd with n=1 (Pn ) v = (0) for each maximal t-ideal P of D. (6) D is an integrally closed H-domain in which ((a,b) n ) 1 = (((a,b) 1 ) n ) v for all a,b D \(0) and n=1 (Pn ) v = (0) for each maximal t-ideal P of D. Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) and the implication (3) (4) are discussed above. It is clear that (1) (3) and (6). Assume (4), and let P be a minimal prime of a principal ideal. Then P is a maximal t-ideal and is therefore divisorial (see above). Pick u P 1 \D. Then, since D has t-dimension one, P = (D : D Du). It follows that D is a Krull domain by [16, Proposition 2.4]. Hence (4) (1). Finally, we have (6) (5) by Theorem 1.13 and (5) (2) by Proposition 3.3.
13 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 13 According to Corollary 3.4, if R is an integrally closed non-krull H-domain with n=1 (Pn ) v = (0) for each maximal t-ideal P of R, then we must have ((a,b) n ) 1 (((a,b) 1 ) n ) v for some nonzero a,b D and n > 1. We next give an example of this phenomenon. Example 3.5. Let T be a PID with a maximal ideal P such that k := T/P admits a field F that is algebraically closed in k (e.g., T = F(y)[x], y,x indeterminates). Let ϕ : T k be the natural projection and set R = ϕ 1 (F). Then R is an integrally closed non-krull domain (since R is not completely integrally closed). Of course, P is a divisorial ideal of R. In fact, each maximal ideal of R is divisorial. To see this, let Q P be a maximal ideal of R. Then Q = N R for maximal ideal N M of T. Write N = Tz. Then z 1 PQ z 1 PN P R, and z 1 P R (indeed, z 1 P T). Hence Q is divisorial. Hence R is (vacuously) an H-domain. Since Q n N n = Tz n and Tz n is divisorial (as an ideal of R), we have n=1 (Qn ) v n=1 Tzn = (0). Write P = Tc. Then P n = Tc n, whichis divisorial. Hence n=1 (Pn ) v = n=1 Tcn = (0). Thus R has the required properties. It is not difficult to identify elements a,b as in the preceding paragraph: let t T \R. Then (1,t) 1 = (R : R Rt) = P, whence (((1,t) 1 ) n ) v = P n. On the other hand, ((1,t) n ) 1 = P. Now take a = c and b = ct. Let D be a Noetherian domain. Then D is certainly an H-domain. Moreover, D is integrally closed if and only if D is a Krull domain. In view of the equivalence (1) (5) of Corollary 3.4, we have: Corollary 3.6. A Noetherian domain D is integrally closed if and only if D is a v-pcd and n=1 (Mn ) v = (0) for each maximal t-ideal M of D. AswesawinExample2.4(1), anoetheriandomainneednotbeav-pcd.whatis more interesting here is the fact that not every Noetherian domain has the property that for every maximal t-ideal M we have (M n ) v = (0). We end this section with an example of this. Example 3.7. Let F k be a root closed extension of fields with [k : F] finite. Let T = k[x,y] = k +M, x,y indeterminates and M = (x,y), and let R = F +M. Then R is Noetherian. It is easy to see that M 1 = T, whence R is a v-pcd by Lemma 2.1(2). (But R is not a weak d-pcd by Proposition 1.11(2)). By direct calculation or Corollary 3.6, we cannot have n=1 (Mn ) v = (0). (Indeed, (M n ) v = M for each n 1). 4. Connections with other properties In [26] a domain D was said to have the -property if for a 1,...,a m,b 1,,...,b n D \ (0) we have ( i Da i)( j Db j) = i,j Da ib j. The authors of [3] discussed a special case of this, which we call here the -property: (Da Db)(Dc Dd) = Dac Dad Dbc Dbdfor all a,b,c,d D\(0); and they showed that a Noetherian domain satisfying is locally factorial [3, Corollary 3.9]. Now and are equivalent over a Noetherian domain, for, in this case, implies locally (factorial and hence) GCD, and it is easy to see that a locally GCD-domain is a locally -domain and hence a -domain [26, Theorem 2.1]. Thanks to its efficiency the -property can be used to provide a more satisfying characterization of integrally closed Noetherian domains than does the v-pcd property, as we shall see below. But the -property is more potent in that it can be put to use even in v-coherent
14 14 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH domains. For example, it was shown in [25, Corollary 1.7] that the -property makes a v-coherent domain a generalized GCD-domain (GGCD-domain): a domain in which ad bd is invertible for each pair a,b D\(0). We restate the result as the following proposition. Proposition 4.1. An integral domain is a GGCD-domain if and only if D is a v-coherent -domain. Now recall that PvMDs may be characterized as t-locally valuation domains, that is, D is a PvMD if and only if D P is a valuation domain for each maximal t-ideal P of D. In [7], Chang used the local version of Proposition 4.1 to characterize PvMDs. Before stating Chang s result, we need some background. We first recall the w-operation: for a nonzero fractional ideal A of D, A w = {x K xb A for some finitely ideal B of D with B v = D}. It is well known that A w = AD P, where the intersection is taken over the set of maximal t-ideals P of D; moreover, we have A w D P = AD P for each P. Call D a (w)-domain if (( i Da i)( j Db j)) w = i,j Da ib j for all a i,b j D\(0). Proposition 4.2. ([7, Theorem 3]) An integral domain D is a PvMD if and only if D is a v-coherent (w)-domain. In view of [3] we can introduce the notion of a (w)-domain as a domain D suchthat ((Da Db)(Dc Dd)) w = Dac Dad Dbc Dbd, for all a,b,c,d D\(0). We shall show that a Noetherian domain D is integrally closed D is a w-pcd D is a (w)-domain D is a (w)-domain. This is interesting in light of [3, comment following Lemma 3.7], where it is shown that a Krull domain is a d-pcd if and only if all powers of each maximal t-ideal are divisorial and that an integrally closed Noetherian domain need not have this property and hence need not be a d-pcd. In fact, we can establish the result in a more general setting. Recall that a domain D is a strong Mori domain if it satisfies the ascending chain condition on w-ideals. These domains were introduced and studied by Wang and McCasland [22, 23]. They are characterized as domains D for which (1) D M is Noetherian for everymaximalt-idealm ofd and(2)d hasfinitet-character(eachnonzeroelement a of D is contained in only finitely many maximal t-ideals of D) [23, Theorem 1.9]. It is well-known (and follows easily from (1)) that an integrally closed strong Mori domain is completely integrally closed and hence a Krull domain. Theorem 4.3. The following statements are equivalent for a strong Mori domain D. (1) D is integrally closed. (2) D is a w-pcd. (3) D is a (w)-domain. (4) D is a (w)-domain. (5) D is completely integrally closed (and hence a Krull domain). As mentioned above, items (1) and (5) are equivalent. The rest of the proof is contained in the next two lemmas. For the first, we call a local domain (D,M) t- local if its maximal ideal is a t-ideal. (Perhaps a caveat is in order here. Localizing at a maximal t-ideal does not in general produce a t-local domain! However, this is not an issue in the strong Mori setting: for a strong Mori domain D, a prime P of
15 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 15 D is a t-ideal (equivalently, divisorial) if and only if PD P is a t-ideal [18, Lemma 3.17].) Lemma 4.4. For a t-local Noetherian domain (D, M), the following statements are equivalent. (1) D is a -domain. (2) D is a -domain. (3) D is integrally closed. (4) D is a (rank-one discrete) valuation domain. (5) D is a d-pcd. (6) D is a weak d-pcd. Proof. Implications (1) (2), (4) (5) (6), and (4) (1) are trivial, (3) (4) is well known, and (2) (3) is essentially the proof of [3, Corollary 3.9]. Now assume (6). Then M is divisorial, whence M 1 D, and, clearly, M M 2. Therefore, according to Proposition 1.11, M must be invertible, and hence D is a rank-one discrete valuation domain, as desired. Thus (6) (4), and the proof is complete. Lemma 4.5. A domain is a w-pcd ( a (w)-domain, a (w)-domain, integrally closed) if and only if it is t-locally a d-pcd ( a -domain, a -domain, integrally closed). Proof. It is well known that D is integrally closed if and only if it is t-locally integrally closed (and follows easily from the representation D = D P, where the intersection is taken over the set of maximal t-ideals P of D). Let D be a w-pcd, and let M be a maximalt-ideal ofd. Foru K wehave(d M : DM D M u n ) = (D : D Du n )D M = ((D : D Du) n ) w D M = (D : D Du) n D M = (D M : DM D M u) n. Hence D M isad-pcd.nowassumethatd ist-locallyad-pcd,andletp denotethesetof maximalt-idealsofd. Thenforu K, (D : D Du n ) = (D : D Du n ) w = P P (D : D Du n )D P = P P (D P : DP D P u n ) = P P (D : D Du) n D P = ((D : D Du) n ) w. The details in the proofs of the other properties are similar. Lemma 4.4 again shows that the -property is much more potent than the v- PCD-property: according to the lemma, a t-local Noetherian domain satisfying must be integrally closed, whereas, if R is as in Example 2.5, then R M is a nonintegrally closed t-local Noetherian v-pcd. For still another example, a PvMD is automatically a v-pcd (Corollary 1.17), but a PvMD with the -property is a GGCD-domain by Proposition 4.1. On the other hand, the v-pcd property is useful in determining whether a domain is completely integrally closed. Now let us step back and take another look at (3) of Lemma 4.4 and ask: What if we consider a (not necessarily Noetherian) t-local domain with maximal ideal M divisorial but include the condition that M n = (0)? We show that the result would still be a discrete rank one valuation domain: Proposition 4.6. Let (D,M) be a local d-pcd such that M is divisorial and n=1 Mn = (0). Then D is a rank-one discrete valuation domain. Proof. By Proposition 3.3, D is completely integrally closed. Thus (MM 1 ) v = D, and then, since M is divisorial, MM 1 = D. Hence M is principal. The condition M n = (0) then ensures that D is one-dimensional, that is, that D is a rank-one discrete valuation domain.
16 16 D.D. ANDERSON, EVAN HOUSTON, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH We close with yet another characterization of Krull domains. Theorem 4.7. A domain D is a Krull domain if and only if it has the folllowing properties: (1) Each maximal t-ideal of D is divisorial. (2) n=1 (Mn ) w = (0) for each maximal t-ideal M of D. (3) D is a w-pcd. Proof. It iswell-knownthat akrulldomainhasthe first propertyand that the v-, t- and w-operations coincide. Properties (2) and (3) then follow from Corollary 3.4. Now assume that D is a domain with the properties listed. By (1), R is an H- domain [16, Proposition 2.4]. It is well-known that each maximal w-ideal of D is a maximal t-ideal (and vice versa) and that the w-operation is of finite type. Hence (2) and (3), together with Proposition 3.3, imply that D is completely integrally closed. Therefore, D, being a completely integrally closed H-domain, is a Krull domain [13, 3.2(d)]. References [1] D.D. Anderson, Star operations induced by overrings, Comm. Algebra 16 (1988), [2] D.D. Anderson, D.F. Anderson, M. Fontana and M. Zafrullah, On v-domains and star operations, Comm. Algebra 37 (2009), [3] D.D. Anderson, D.F. Anderson and E.W. Johnson, Some ideal theoretic conditions on a Noetherian ring, Houston J. Math. 7 (1981), [4] D.D. Anderson, D.F. Anderson and M. Zafrullah, Completely integrally closed Prüfer v- multiplication domains, Comm. Algebra, to appear. [5] D.F. Anderson and D. Dobbs, Pairs of rings with the same prime ideals, Canad. J. Math. 32 (1980), [6] A. Bouvier and M. Zafrullah, On some class groups of an integral domain, Bull. Soc. Math. Grece 29 (1988), [7] G.W. Chang, A new charaterization of Prüfer v-multiplication domains, Korean J. Math. 23 (2015), [8] S. El Baghdadi, M. Fontana and M. Zafrullah, Intersections of quotient rings and Prufer v-multiplication domains, J. Algebra Appl. 15 (2016), , 18 pp. [9] M. Fontana and S. Gabelli, On the class group and the local class group of a pullback, J. Algebra 181 (1996), [10] S. Gabelli and E. Houston, Coherentlike conditions in pullbacks, Michigan Math. J. 44 (1997), [11] R. Gilmer, Multiplicative Ideal Theory, Dekker, New York, [12] R. Gilmer, Finite element factorization in group rings, Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 7, Dekker, New York, [13] S. Glaz and W. Vasconcelos, Flat ideals II, Manuscripta Math. 22 (1977), [14] W. Heinzer, An essential integral domain with a nonessential localization, Canad. J. Math. 33 (1981), [15] J. Hedstrom and E. Houston, Pseudo-valuation domains, Pacific J. Math. 75 (1978), [16] E. Houston and M. Zafrullah, Integral domains in which each t-ideal is divisorial, Michigan Math. J. 35 (1988), [17] E. Houston and M. Zafrullah, On t-invertibility II, Comm. Algebra 17 (1989), [18] B.G. Kang, Prüfer v-multiplication domains and the ring R[X] Nv, J. Algebra 123 (1989), [19] A. Loper and T. Lucas, Factoring ideals in almost Dedekind domains, J. Reine Angew Math. 565 (2003), [20] H. Uda, LCM-stableness in ring extensions, Hiroshima Math. J. 13 (1983), [21] H. Uda, G 2 -stableness and LCM-stableness, Hiroshima Math. J. 18, (1988), [22] F. Wang and R. McCasland, On w-modules over strong Mori domains, Comm. Algebra 25 (1997),
17 -POWER CONDUCTOR DOMAINS 17 [23] F. Wang and R. McCasland, On strong Mori domains, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 135 (1999), [24] M. Zafrullah, A general theory of almost factoriality, Manuscripta Math. 51 (1985), [25] M. Zafrullah, On generalized Dedekind domains, Mathematika, 33 (1986), [26] M. Zafrullah, On a property of pre-schreier domains, Comm. Algebra 15 (9) (1987), Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA U.S.A. address: dan-anderson@uiowa.edu Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC U.S.A. address: eghousto@uncc.edu Department of Mathematic, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID U.S.A. address: mzafrullah@usa.net
Splitting sets and weakly Matlis domains
Commutative Algebra and Applications, 1 8 de Gruyter 2009 Splitting sets and weakly Matlis domains D. D. Anderson and Muhammad Zafrullah Abstract. An integral domain D is weakly Matlis if the intersection
More informationSOME APPLICATIONS OF ZORN S LEMMA IN ALGEBRA
SOME APPLICATIONS OF ZORN S LEMMA IN ALGEBRA D. D. ANDERSON 1, DAVID E. DOBBS 2, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH 3 Abstract. We indicate some new applications of Zorn s Lemma to a number of algebraic areas. Specifically,
More informationOn an Extension of Half Condensed Domains
Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-1768 Volume 12, Number 6 (2016), pp. 5309 5316 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/gjpam.htm On an Extension of Half Condensed
More informationON ALMOST PSEUDO-VALUATION DOMAINS, II. Gyu Whan Chang
Korean J. Math. 19 (2011), No. 4, pp. 343 349 ON ALMOST PSEUDO-VALUATION DOMAINS, II Gyu Whan Chang Abstract. Let D be an integral domain, D w be the w-integral closure of D, X be an indeterminate over
More informationLOCALLY PRINCIPAL IDEALS AND FINITE CHARACTER arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 16 May 2013
LOCALLY PRINCIPAL IDEALS AND FINITE CHARACTER arxiv:1305.3829v1 [math.ac] 16 May 2013 STEFANIA GABELLI Abstract. It is well-known that if R is a domain with finite character, each locally principal nonzero
More informationt-reductions AND t-integral CLOSURE OF IDEALS
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 47, Number 6, 2017 t-reductions AND t-integral CLOSURE OF IDEALS S. KABBAJ AND A. KADRI ABSTRACT. Let R be an integral domain and I a nonzero ideal of R. An
More informationCharacterizing integral domains by semigroups of ideals
Characterizing integral domains by semigroups of ideals Stefania Gabelli Notes for an advanced course in Ideal Theory a. a. 2009-2010 1 Contents 1 Star operations 4 1.1 The v-operation and the t-operation..............
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ac] 23 Feb 2016
-REDUCTIONS OF IDEALS AND PRÜFER V -MULTIPLICATION DOMAINS arxiv:1602.07035v1 [math.ac] 23 Feb 2016 E. HOUSTON, S. KABBAJ ( ), AND A. MIMOUNI ( ) ABSTRACT. Let R be a commutative ring and I an ideal of
More informationGRADED INTEGRAL DOMAINS AND NAGATA RINGS, II. Gyu Whan Chang
Korean J. Math. 25 (2017), No. 2, pp. 215 227 https://doi.org/10.11568/kjm.2017.25.2.215 GRADED INTEGRAL DOMAINS AND NAGATA RINGS, II Gyu Whan Chang Abstract. Let D be an integral domain with quotient
More informationa.b. star operations vs e.a.b. star operations Marco Fontana Università degli Studi Roma Tre
a.b. star operations vs e.a.b. star operations presented by Marco Fontana Università degli Studi Roma Tre from a joint work with K. Alan Loper Ohio State University 1 Let D be an integral domain with quotient
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ac] 6 Mar 2006
STAR STABLE DOMAINS arxiv:math/0603147v1 [math.ac] 6 Mar 2006 STEFANIA GABELLI AND GIAMPAOLO PICOZZA Abstract. We introduce and study the notion of -stability with respect to a semistar operation defined
More informationUPPERS TO ZERO IN POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND PRÜFER-LIKE DOMAINS
Communications in Algebra, 37: 164 192, 2009 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0092-7872 print/1532-4125 online DOI: 10.1080/00927870802243564 UPPERS TO ZERO IN POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND PRÜFER-LIKE
More informationBulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society
ISSN: 1017-060X (Print) ISSN: 1735-8515 (Online) Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 41 (2015), No. 4, pp. 815 824. Title: Pseudo-almost valuation rings Author(s): R. Jahani-Nezhad and F.
More informationTHE v-operation IN EXTENSIONS OF INTEGRAL DOMAINS
THE v-operation IN EXTENSIONS OF INTEGRAL DOMAINS DAVID F. ANDERSON 1, SAID EL BAGHDADI 2, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH 3 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996, USA anderson@math.utk.edu
More informationA NOTE ON ZERO DIVISORS
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 51 (2014), No. 6, pp. 1851 1861 http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/bkms.2014.51.6.1851 A NOTE ON ZERO DIVISORS IN w-noetherian-like RINGS Hwankoo Kim, Tae In Kwon, and Min Surp Rhee Abstract.
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ac] 22 Sep 2003
arxiv:math/0309360v1 [math.ac] 22 Sep 2003 ESSENTIAL DOMAINS AND TWO CONJECTURES IN DIMENSION THEORY M. FONTANA AND S. KABBAJ Abstract. This note investigates two long-standing conjectures on the Krull
More informationFINITE CONDUCTOR PROPERTIES OF R(X) AND R<X>
Marcel Dekker Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics 220 (2001), 231-250 FINITE CONDUCTOR PROPERTIES OF R(X) AND R SARAH GLAZ Department of Mathematics University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269
More informationAdditively Regular Rings and Marot Rings
Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 5(Special Issue: 1) (2016), 90 99 Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2016 Additively Regular Rings and Marot Rings Thomas G. Lucas Communicated by Ayman Badawi MSC
More informationRELATIVE ASCENT AND DESCENT IN A DOMAIN EXTENSION. Tariq Shah
International Electronic Journal of Algebra Volume 7 (2010) 34-46 RELATIVE ASCENT AND DESCENT IN A DOMAIN EXTENSION Tariq Shah Received: 11 December 2008; Revised: 29 June 2009 Communicated by Abdullah
More informationIntroduction Non-uniqueness of factorization in A[x]... 66
Abstract In this work, we study the factorization in A[x], where A is an Artinian local principal ideal ring (briefly SPIR), whose maximal ideal, (t), has nilpotency h: this is not a Unique Factorization
More informationDedekind Domains. Mathematics 601
Dedekind Domains Mathematics 601 In this note we prove several facts about Dedekind domains that we will use in the course of proving the Riemann-Roch theorem. The main theorem shows that if K/F is a finite
More informationPIF-Property in Pullbacks
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 33, 1625-1629 PIF-Property in Pullbacks Chahrazade Bakkari Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez Box 2202, University S. M.
More informationKAPLANSKY-TYPE THEOREMS IN GRADED INTEGRAL DOMAINS
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 52 (2015), No. 4, pp. 1253 1268 http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/bkms.2015.52.4.1253 KAPLANSKY-TYPE THEOREMS IN GRADED INTEGRAL DOMAINS Gyu Whan Chang, Hwankoo Kim, and Dong Yeol Oh Abstract.
More informationAP-DOMAINS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION
AP-DOMAINS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION JIM COYKENDALL AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH Abstract. In this paper we generalize the standard notion of unique factorization domains (UFDs) to the the nonatomic situation.
More informationON STRONGLY PRIME IDEALS AND STRONGLY ZERO-DIMENSIONAL RINGS. Christian Gottlieb
ON STRONGLY PRIME IDEALS AND STRONGLY ZERO-DIMENSIONAL RINGS Christian Gottlieb Department of Mathematics, University of Stockholm SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden gottlieb@math.su.se Abstract A prime ideal
More informationTHE HALF-FACTORIAL PROPERTY IN INTEGRAL EXTENSIONS. Jim Coykendall Department of Mathematics North Dakota State University Fargo, ND.
THE HALF-FACTORIAL PROPERTY IN INTEGRAL EXTENSIONS Jim Coykendall Department of Mathematics North Dakota State University Fargo, ND. 58105-5075 ABSTRACT. In this paper, the integral closure of a half-factorial
More informationPolynomial closure in essential domains
manuscripta math. 117, 29 41 (2005) Springer-Verlag 2005 Mi Hee Park Francesca Tartarone Polynomial closure in essential domains Received: 3 April 2004/Revised version: 5 February 2005 Published online:
More information4.4 Noetherian Rings
4.4 Noetherian Rings Recall that a ring A is Noetherian if it satisfies the following three equivalent conditions: (1) Every nonempty set of ideals of A has a maximal element (the maximal condition); (2)
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ac] 9 Jan 2017
COMMUTATIVE RINGS WITH TWO-ABSORBING FACTORIZATION arxiv:1701.02104v1 [math.ac] 9 Jan 2017 MUZAMMIL MUKHTAR, MALIK TUSIF AHMED AND TIBERIU DUMITRESCU Abstract. We use the concept of 2-absorbing ideal introduced
More informationPRÜFER CONDITIONS IN RINGS WITH ZERO- DIVISORS
PRÜFER CONDITIONS IN RINGS WITH ZERO- DIVISORS SARAH GLAZ Department of Mathematics University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 glaz@uconnvm.uconn.edu 1. INTRODUCTION In his article: Untersuchungen über
More informationTIGHT CLOSURE IN NON EQUIDIMENSIONAL RINGS ANURAG K. SINGH
TIGHT CLOSURE IN NON EQUIDIMENSIONAL RINGS ANURAG K. SINGH 1. Introduction Throughout our discussion, all rings are commutative, Noetherian and have an identity element. The notion of the tight closure
More informationPseudo-Valuation Maps and Pseudo-Valuation Domains
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 17, 799-805 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com Pseudo-Valuation Maps and Pseudo-Valuation Domains Waheed Ahmad Khan 1 and Abdelghani Taouti 2 1 Department of
More informationCONTROLLING THE ZERO DIVISORS OF A COMMUTATIVE RING
Marcel Dekker Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics 231 (2002), pages 191-212 CONTROLLING THE ZERO DIVISORS OF A COMMUTATIVE RING SARAH GLAZ Department of Mathematics, University of Connecticut,
More informationAssigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008
18.705 Assigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008 Problem Set 1. Due 9/11 Problem R 1.5 Let ϕ: A B be a ring homomorphism. Prove that ϕ 1 takes prime ideals P of B to prime ideals of A. Prove
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More information8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions
70 Andreas Gathmann 8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions 13 When it comes to actual computations, Euclidean domains (or more generally principal ideal domains) are probably the nicest rings
More information(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d
The Algebraic Method 0.1. Integral Domains. Emmy Noether and others quickly realized that the classical algebraic number theory of Dedekind could be abstracted completely. In particular, rings of integers
More informationIn Theorem 2.2.4, we generalized a result about field extensions to rings. Here is another variation.
Chapter 3 Valuation Rings The results of this chapter come into play when analyzing the behavior of a rational function defined in the neighborhood of a point on an algebraic curve. 3.1 Extension Theorems
More informationNOETHERIAN SPACES OF INTEGRALLY CLOSED RINGS WITH AN APPLICATION TO INTERSECTIONS OF VALUATION RINGS
NOETHERIAN SPACES OF INTEGRALLY CLOSED RINGS WITH AN APPLICATION TO INTERSECTIONS OF VALUATION RINGS BRUCE OLBERDING Abstract. Let H be an integral domain, and let Σ be a collection of integrally closed
More informationIntersections of valuation overrings of two-dimensional Noetherian domains
Intersections of valuation overrings of two-dimensional Noetherian domains Bruce Olberding Abstract We survey and extend recent work on integrally closed overrings of two-dimensional Noetherian domains,
More informationON SOME GENERALIZED VALUATION MONOIDS
Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 41, No. 2, 2011, 111-116 ON SOME GENERALIZED VALUATION MONOIDS Tariq Shah 1, Waheed Ahmad Khan 2 Abstract. The valuation monoids and pseudo-valuation monoids have been established
More informationON THE ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPH OF A RING
Communications in Algebra, 36: 3073 3092, 2008 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0092-7872 print/1532-4125 online DOI: 10.1080/00927870802110888 ON THE ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPH OF A RING David F. Anderson
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ANDREW SALCH 1. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. The last lecture left off with the claim that, if J k[x 1,..., x n ] is an ideal, then
More informationIntegral domains with Boolean t-class semigroup
Arab J Math (2012) 1:89 95 DOI 10.1007/s40065-012-0009-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE S. Kabbaj A. Mimouni Integral domains with Boolean t-class semigroup Received: 25 September 2010 / Accepted: 19 October 2010 /
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.ac] 30 Dec 2017
MCD-FINITE DOMAINS AND ASCENT OF IDF PROPERTY IN POLYNOMIAL EXTENSIONS arxiv:1604.05348v3 [math.ac] 30 Dec 2017 SINA EFTEKHARI AND MAHDI REZA KHORSANDI Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Shahrood University
More informationOn some properties of elementary derivations in dimension six
Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 56 (200) 69 79 www.elsevier.com/locate/jpaa On some properties of elementary derivations in dimension six Joseph Khoury Department of Mathematics, University of Ottawa,
More information(Rgs) Rings Math 683L (Summer 2003)
(Rgs) Rings Math 683L (Summer 2003) We will first summarise the general results that we will need from the theory of rings. A unital ring, R, is a set equipped with two binary operations + and such that
More informationQuasi-primary submodules satisfying the primeful property II
Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Volume 44 (4) (2015), 801 811 Quasi-primary submodules satisfying the primeful property II Hosein Fazaeli Moghimi and Mahdi Samiei Abstract In this paper
More informationGENERATING NON-NOETHERIAN MODULES CONSTRUCTIVELY
GENERATING NON-NOETHERIAN MODULES CONSTRUCTIVELY THIERRY COQUAND, HENRI LOMBARDI, CLAUDE QUITTÉ Abstract. In [6], Heitmann gives a proof of a Basic Element Theorem, which has as corollaries some versions
More informationStudying monoids is not enough to study multiplicative properties of rings: an elementary approach
Arab. J. Math. (2015) 4:29 34 DOI 10.1007/s40065-014-0118-1 Arabian Journal of Mathematics Marco Fontana Muhammad Zafrullah Studying monoids is not enough to study multiplicative properties of rings: an
More information32 Divisibility Theory in Integral Domains
3 Divisibility Theory in Integral Domains As we have already mentioned, the ring of integers is the prototype of integral domains. There is a divisibility relation on * : an integer b is said to be divisible
More informationZERO-DIMENSIONALITY AND SERRE RINGS. D. Karim
Serdica Math. J. 30 (2004), 87 94 ZERO-DIMENSIONALITY AND SERRE RINGS D. Karim Communicated by L. Avramov Abstract. This paper deals with zero-dimensionality. We investigate the problem of whether a Serre
More informationATOMIC AND AP SEMIGROUP RINGS F [X; M], WHERE M IS A SUBMONOID OF THE ADDITIVE MONOID OF NONNEGATIVE RATIONAL NUMBERS. Ryan Gipson and Hamid Kulosman
International Electronic Journal of Algebra Volume 22 (2017) 133-146 DOI: 10.24330/ieja.325939 ATOMIC AND AP SEMIGROUP RINGS F [X; M], WHERE M IS A SUBMONOID OF THE ADDITIVE MONOID OF NONNEGATIVE RATIONAL
More informationTROPICAL SCHEME THEORY
TROPICAL SCHEME THEORY 5. Commutative algebra over idempotent semirings II Quotients of semirings When we work with rings, a quotient object is specified by an ideal. When dealing with semirings (and lattices),
More informationFactorizations of ideals in noncommutative rings similar to factorizations of ideals in commutative Dedekind domains
Factorizations of ideals in noncommutative rings similar to factorizations of ideals in commutative Dedekind domains Alberto Facchini Università di Padova Conference on Rings and Factorizations Graz, 21
More informationDomains over which polynomials split
Domains over which polynomials split Muhammad Zafrullah Abstract. An integrally closed integral domain R is a Schreier ring if its group of divisibility is a Riesz group, i.e., for all a, b, c R\{0} a
More informationDiscrete valuation rings. Suppose F is a field. A discrete valuation on F is a function v : F {0} Z such that:
Discrete valuation rings Suppose F is a field. A discrete valuation on F is a function v : F {0} Z such that: 1. v is surjective. 2. v(ab) = v(a) + v(b). 3. v(a + b) min(v(a), v(b)) if a + b 0. Proposition:
More information11. Finitely-generated modules
11. Finitely-generated modules 11.1 Free modules 11.2 Finitely-generated modules over domains 11.3 PIDs are UFDs 11.4 Structure theorem, again 11.5 Recovering the earlier structure theorem 11.6 Submodules
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationMINKOWSKI THEORY AND THE CLASS NUMBER
MINKOWSKI THEORY AND THE CLASS NUMBER BROOKE ULLERY Abstract. This paper gives a basic introduction to Minkowski Theory and the class group, leading up to a proof that the class number (the order of the
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local
More informationGENERATING IDEALS IN SUBRINGS OF K[[X]] VIA NUMERICAL SEMIGROUPS
GENERATING IDEALS IN SUBRINGS OF K[[X]] VIA NUMERICAL SEMIGROUPS SCOTT T. CHAPMAN Abstract. Let K be a field and S be the numerical semigroup generated by the positive integers n 1,..., n k. We discuss
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More information< 2k...Setting d 0 = D we have (I n ) v (d t ). ( We may reason thus: (I n ) v (I n ) v (d t ) whenn=kt+r wheret=0,1,2,... and0 r<k,so.
QUESTION (HD 1505): Said El-Baghdadi and Hwankoo Kim ask, in a paper to appear in Communication in Algebra, if D[[X]] is a generalized Krull domain when D is. Do you have any comments? I found the pre-print
More informationA COURSE ON INTEGRAL DOMAINS
A COURSE ON INTEGRAL DOMAINS ALGEBRA II - SPRING 2004 Updated - March 3, 2004 1. The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic My son who is in the 4 th grade is learning about prime numbers and cancelling prime
More informationIntegral Extensions. Chapter Integral Elements Definitions and Comments Lemma
Chapter 2 Integral Extensions 2.1 Integral Elements 2.1.1 Definitions and Comments Let R be a subring of the ring S, and let α S. We say that α is integral over R if α isarootofamonic polynomial with coefficients
More information5 Dedekind extensions
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #5 09/22/2016 5 Dedekind extensions In this lecture we prove that the integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite extension of its fraction field is also
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationWEAKLY FACTORIAL DOMAINS AND GROUPS OF DIVISIBILITY
proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 109, Number 4, August 1990 WEAKLY FACTORIAL DOMAINS AND GROUPS OF DIVISIBILITY D. D. ANDERSON AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH (Communicated by Louis J. Ratliff,
More informationarxiv: v4 [math.ac] 6 Dec 2017
DOMAINS WITH INVERTIBLE-RADICAL FACTORIZATION arxiv:1612.01477v4 [math.ac] 6 Dec 2017 MALIK TUSIF AHMED AND TIBERIU DUMITRESCU Abstract. We study those integral domains in which every proper ideal can
More informationFactorization in Domains
Last Time Chain Conditions and s Uniqueness of s The Division Algorithm Revisited in Domains Ryan C. Trinity University Modern Algebra II Last Time Chain Conditions and s Uniqueness of s The Division Algorithm
More informationIDEAL CLASSES AND RELATIVE INTEGERS
IDEAL CLASSES AND RELATIVE INTEGERS KEITH CONRAD The ring of integers of a number field is free as a Z-module. It is a module not just over Z, but also over any intermediate ring of integers. That is,
More informationSome remarks on Krull's conjecture regarding almost integral elements
Math. J., Ibaraki Univ., Vol. 30, 1998 Some remarks on Krull's conjecture regarding almost integral elements HABTE GEBRU* Introduction A basic notion in algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry is
More information9. Integral Ring Extensions
80 Andreas Gathmann 9. Integral ing Extensions In this chapter we want to discuss a concept in commutative algebra that has its original motivation in algebra, but turns out to have surprisingly many applications
More informationHomework 4 Solutions
Homework 4 Solutions November 11, 2016 You were asked to do problems 3,4,7,9,10 in Chapter 7 of Lang. Problem 3. Let A be an integral domain, integrally closed in its field of fractions K. Let L be a finite
More informationSKOLEM PROPERTIES, VALUE-FUNCTIONS, AND DIVISORIAL IDEALS
SKOLEM PROPERTIES, VALUE-FUNCTIONS, AND DIVISORIAL IDEALS PAUL-JEAN CAHEN, JEAN-LUC CHABERT, EVAN HOUSTON, AND THOMAS G. LUCAS Abstract. Let D be the ring of integers of a number field K. It is well known
More informationPrüfer domain. Thierry Coquand. August 2008
Thierry Coquand August 2008 Valuation domain A valuation domain is an integral domain R such that for any u, v in R either v divides u or u divides v Another formulation is that for any s 0 in the field
More informationAvailable online at J. Math. Comput. Sci. 4 (2014), No. 3, ISSN: ORDERINGS AND PREORDERINGS ON MODULES
Available online at http://scik.org J. Math. Comput. Sci. 4 (2014), No. 3, 574-586 ISSN: 1927-5307 ORDERINGS AND PREORDERINGS ON MODULES DONGMING HUANG Department of Applied Mathematics, Hainan University,
More informationTHE ASSOCIATED PRIMES OF LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES OVER RINGS OF SMALL DIMENSION. Thomas Marley
THE ASSOCATED PRMES OF LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES OVER RNGS OF SMALL DMENSON Thomas Marley Abstract. Let R be a commutative Noetherian local ring of dimension d, an ideal of R, and M a finitely generated
More informationChapter 14: Divisibility and factorization
Chapter 14: Divisibility and factorization Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 4120, Summer I 2014 M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter
More informationStructure of rings. Chapter Algebras
Chapter 5 Structure of rings 5.1 Algebras It is time to introduce the notion of an algebra over a commutative ring. So let R be a commutative ring. An R-algebra is a ring A (unital as always) together
More informationZARISKI-LIKE TOPOLOGY ON THE CLASSICAL PRIME SPECTRUM OF A MODULE
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 35 No. 1 (2009), pp 253-269. ZARISKI-LIKE TOPOLOGY ON THE CLASSICAL PRIME SPECTRUM OF A MODULE M. BEHBOODI AND M. J. NOORI Abstract. Let R be a commutative
More informationCHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998
CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley 18 February 1998 This chapter gives some preliminary material on number theory and algebraic geometry. Section 1 gives basic
More information2. Prime and Maximal Ideals
18 Andreas Gathmann 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals There are two special kinds of ideals that are of particular importance, both algebraically and geometrically: the so-called prime and maximal ideals. Let
More information3 Properties of Dedekind domains
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #3 09/15/2016 3 Proerties of Dedekind domains In the revious lecture we defined a Dedekind domain as a noetherian domain A that satisfies either of the following
More informationThus, the integral closure A i of A in F i is a finitely generated (and torsion-free) A-module. It is not a priori clear if the A i s are locally
Math 248A. Discriminants and étale algebras Let A be a noetherian domain with fraction field F. Let B be an A-algebra that is finitely generated and torsion-free as an A-module with B also locally free
More informationA Krull-type theorem for the semistar integral
A Krull-type theorem for the semistar integral closure of an integral domain Marco Fontana Dipartimento di Matematica Universit a degli Studi, Roma Tre Italy fontana@mat.uniroma3.it K. Alan Loper Department
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ac] 13 Feb 2003
arxiv:math/0302163v1 [math.ac] 13 Feb 2003 NAGATA RINGS, KRONECKER FUNCTION RINGS AND RELATED SEMISTAR OPERATIONS MARCO FONTANA 1 AND K. ALAN LOPER 2 1 Dipartimento di Matematica Università degli Studi
More informationThis dissertation is available at Iowa Research Online:
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Theses and Dissertations Spring 2010 Relative primeness Jeremiah N Reinkoester University of Iowa Copyright 2010 Jeremiah N Reinkoester This dissertation is available
More informationPolynomial functions on subsets of non-commutative rings a link between ringsets and null-ideal sets
Polynomial functions on subsets of non-commutative rings a lin between ringsets and null-ideal sets Sophie Frisch 1, 1 Institut für Analysis und Zahlentheorie, Technische Universität Graz, Koperniusgasse
More informationPlaces of Number Fields and Function Fields MATH 681, Spring 2018
Places of Number Fields and Function Fields MATH 681, Spring 2018 From now on we will denote the field Z/pZ for a prime p more compactly by F p. More generally, for q a power of a prime p, F q will denote
More informationLecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).
Lecture 2 1. Noetherian and Artinian rings and modules Let A be a commutative ring with identity, A M a module, and φ : M N an A-linear map. Then ker φ = {m M : φ(m) = 0} is a submodule of M and im φ is
More information2. Intersection Multiplicities
2. Intersection Multiplicities 11 2. Intersection Multiplicities Let us start our study of curves by introducing the concept of intersection multiplicity, which will be central throughout these notes.
More informationCHARACTERIZING DOMAINS OF FINITE -CHARACTER
CHARACTERIZING DOMAINS OF FINITE -CHARACTER TIBERIU DUMITRESCU AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH To the memory of Professor Abdus Salam, a Nobel laureate Physicist and an Applied Mathematician with a pure heart.
More information4. Noether normalisation
4. Noether normalisation We shall say that a ring R is an affine ring (or affine k-algebra) if R is isomorphic to a polynomial ring over a field k with finitely many indeterminates modulo an ideal, i.e.,
More informationPrimal, completely irreducible, and primary meet decompositions in modules
Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie Tome 54(102) No. 4, 2011, 297 311 Primal, completely irreducible, and primary meet decompositions in modules by Toma Albu and Patrick F. Smith Abstract This paper was
More informationMATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE
MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE 1 2 STEFAN GILLE 1. Rings We recall first the definition of a group. 1.1. Definition. Let G be a non empty set. The set G is called a group if there is a map called
More informationSTRONGLY JÓNSSON AND STRONGLY HS MODULES
STRONGLY JÓNSSON AND STRONGLY HS MODULES GREG OMAN Abstract. Let R be a commutative ring with identity and let M be an infinite unitary R-module. Then M is a Jónsson module provided every proper R-submodule
More informationSTRONG CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES OF SFT RINGS. John T. Condo 748 Jamie Way Atlanta, GA 30188
STRONG CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES OF SFT RINGS John T. Condo 748 Jamie Way Atlanta, GA 30188 Jim Coykendall Department of Mathematics North Dakota State University Fargo, ND 58105-5075 Abstract This paper
More informationCharacterizations and constructions of h-local domains
Contributions to Module Theory, 1 21 c de Gruyter 2007 Characterizations and constructions of h-local domains Bruce Olberding Abstract. H-local domains arise in a variety of module- and ideal-theoretic
More information