SUPPLY. Start with the short run in the very short run there is no supply response:
|
|
- Willis O’Neal’
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UPPLY tart wth the short run n the very short run there s no supply response: Fg. Perfect competton:. Large # of frms,. sellng homogeneous product 3. p max. 4. Prce takers 5. Perfect nformaton 6. No transacton cost. 7. Free Entry and Ext hort Run upply Curve: hort Run upply Curve: When suppler are able to react to prce changes the demand curve upward slope. For an ndustry we can sum up the supply curves of each frm n the ndustry to get the ndustry supply cuvres. Assumng prefect competton the MC curve wll be the frm supply curve. Fg.
2 Combnaton of all ndvdual frms. hort Run upply Functon: Q ( P, v, w) n  q ( P, v, w) Where P prce v functon prce of captal w functon prce of labor hort Run elastcty of supply: e s, p %DQs % DP dqs dp P Q s Unlke demand, e s,p >0 wq Example from book: TC 4v Under perfect competton, frms are prce takers so demand perfectly elastc (horzontal demand curve) so P MR. max P MR MC Fg. 3 MC PMR wq 00 p fp MC f q 400 w If w 4 then q 50P If there are 00 dentcal frms, market supply: Q s wll be: 00  q 00 50P 5000P
3 00P If w ncreases to 5 then the new frm supply curve s: q 40 p 5 The market supply curve s: Q s 00 Â Elastcty of market supply: e sp q 4000P d s P P 4000P 4000 P Q Q Q From upply functon f Q s 4000P f e sp Relatonshp between market frm and ndvdual demand: s s s Fg. 4! D` d d ` D D D Fg. 4 Market Frm Indvdual ` ` Mathematcal model of upply and Demand: Q D 0 P(_) where _ shft parameter (ncome, etc) Q (P,_) where _ parameter (nput prces, no. of producers n the market) D P D P < 0, P >0 P f D D a a (?)0 (?)0 b any sgn Equlbrum: Q D Q Total dfferentaton to both sdes: dq D D P * dp + D a * da
4 dq P * dp + b * db Mantenance of equlbrum requres: dq D dq f D P * dp + D a * da P * dp + b * db Assume b 0 only demand parameter changes: D P *dp + D a *da P * dp f -D P *dp + P *dp D a * da f (-D P + P )*dp D a * da dp da D a - D P + P The sgn of the partal s not determned. P Da a Elastcty: e P,a f Multpled by f ep,a a P - D P P P a a P P D a - D P a P a Q Qa Multply by (Q/Q) f e P,a ( P - DP ) P ep-e QP D a Q Prce shft functon elastcty depends on prce elastcty of supply and demand. e LONG RUN LONG RUN COMPETITION EQUILIBRIUM A perfectly comp. Industry s n long run equlbrum f there are no ncentves to enter or leave the ndustry. The no. of frms wll be such that: P MC AC f no economc proft. Constant cost: entry does not affect LRAC horzontal Increasng cost: entry ncreases cost of nputs (LRAC upward slopng) Decreasng cost: entry reduces cost of nputs (LRAC downward slopng) FIRM FIRM MC AC Q
5 Consumer and Producer surplus Fg. 8 C P C +P Q [ U ( Q) - P Q] + PQ - Ú P( Q) dq U ( Q) - Ú P( Q) dq U(Q): utlty functon P(Q): long run supply.. 0 f U (Q) P(Q) so max. occurs when margnal value of Q for consumer s equal to the market prce. We could also just take the dfference of the area under the demand curve and supply curve for: Q Q Q 0 Q Ú 0 P ( Q) d( Q) - d Q Ú 0 P ( Q) d( Q) s Welfare analyss Restrctons or prce controls Quantty restrcton
6 Fg. 9 P Prce controls In fgure 9 above the prce floor causes excess supply. Ths also cause a shft from C to P of the rectangle above and a DWL f the trangle above. In fgure 0 below we can see as the prce floor get closer to the equlbrum prce there s less DWL and less C s transfer to producers. Fg. 0 Other example wth long run effects n supply: Now consder a prce celng at the current equlbrum prce of P. If demand ncreases the equlbrum prce would be P 3. There would be a transfer from P to C and DWL. Wth tme the supply curve wll become more elastc or just shft to the left, causng less supply at each prce. Fg. P3 P P L Tax Incdence P D P t Ths s the dfference pad by consumers and receved by producers.
7 Total dff.: dp D dp dt f dp dp D dt Market equlbrum f dq D dq f D p dp D p dp Pluggng n from above f D p dp D p (dp D - dt) f P t D p p - D p e e - e D where D p D and P p P Dong the same for supply P t ed e - e D where: e D 0 and e 0 P P f D 0 and 0 t t P If e d 0 then d (all tax pad by consumer) t P - If e d - then t (all tax pad by producer) Dvdng: P t - e t consumer(tax payer) wll be. D - so the more elastc the functons are the better off the PD e + t Fg. t
8 Trade restrctons: (Note: Unlke your text, t s assumed the domestc market s large enough to affect the world prce.) Fg. 3 L P * A L W P w B D C Q Pm Q * Q w Area ABC: net gan by consumer Area P * BDP w : transfer from domestc prod. to consumers Wthout restrcton domestc supplers produce Q dom Fg. 4 ame Graph P`` P` III II IV I Area I: net P.., gan to foregn producers Area II: transfer from domestc to foregn Area III: Transfer from P to C Area IV: DWL to C
9 Fg. 5 Tarff transfer from Domestc cons.to E LDOM LW -t L DWL for Domestc consumers DWL for Foregn producers Now assume the domestc demand does not the world prce (perfectly elastc world supply). Government Revenue DWL for Domestc consumers
10 Now assume the domestc demand does not affect the world prce (perfectly elastc world supply). Government Revenue LDOM P w + t P w DWL for Domestc consumers
11 Chapter 6 (Ncholson) General equlbrum Under the assumpton of perfect competton the unt one prce..to hold.no transacton costs. Edge worth box Frst assume fx amount of nputs (captal and labor) Fg. 6 Total captal Isoquants Total labor Fg. 7 Labor for X Labor for Y K for Y Total K K for X Total Labor Effcency n producton Fg. 8
12 Producton possblty fronters Fg. 9 Y PPF show those alternatve combnatons of outputs that can be produced wth fxed quanttes of nput f those nputs are employed effcently. X Rate of product Transformaton (RPT) slope of PPF (trade off between X and Y ) RPT Y - X hape of PPF uppose we bare a cost functon for ths economy that depend on the amount of X and Y at ths level of nputs: C C (X, Y) Total dff. C C X X C + Y Y I. Know RPT: RPT Y X If dc 0 than C Y RPT - X X C Y MC MC X Y Dmnshng returns Opportunty costs
13 Guns and butter No captal Producton functon: / X L X Y LY Labor force 00 f L Y + L X 00 f X + 4Y 00 Total dff. f X dx + 8Y dy 0 f Equlbrum Prces Y - dx RPT 4 dy X Fg. 0 N N Fg. Excess demand for X A B P x /P y Producer wll produce at A but consumer would buy at B. Excess demand for X so prces adjust to: Fg. P x /P y
14 MR P - P X Y RPT Example: X + 4Y 00 () U XY RPT 4Y X MR - X Y Y X RPT 4 MR X 4Y () X Y From () and () f X +X 00 f X 00 f X Y 00 f Y Comparatve statstcs If utlty functon changes to: U X 3/4 Y /4 RPT MR Techncal Progress Fg. 3 E E
15 Tarffs and trade Fg. 4. Y tot Y E - P /P Y dom P x /P y X dom X E X T After nteracton trade we mport X (X T X dom ) and export Y (Y tot - Y dom. ). General equlbrum prces Assume the followng nverse demand functon: D (P,.., P n ) The whole set of prces: P (P,,P n ) The demand for good s: D (P) D (P * ) (").. In other words, are there a set of prces n whch all markets are n equlbrum? To see ths let defne excess demand n market as: E D (P) D (P) E D (P * ) D (P * ) 0 Ths mples homogenety of degree zero f all markets are nclude.(ncludng factor markets) f all prces are double quantty n equl. stays the same. W.`s Law: n  P ED ( P) 0 Cannot have excess demand or excess supply of all goods.
16 Chapter 7 Effcency of P.C. Pareto effcent allocaton: An allocaton of resources s pareto effcent f t s not possble to make one person better off wthout makng someone else worse off. Productve effcency (techncally effcent): An allocaton of resources s effcent n producton f no further reallocaton would permt more of one good to be product wthout necessarly reducng the output of some other goods. ngle Frm nput choce X f(k x, L x ) K K x L full employment of resources L x amout devoted to X producton. Y g( K y, Ly ) g( K - K x, L - LK ) [ Y - g( K - K, L L )] f ( K x, Lx ) + l x - K where Y g( K, L) K x f K - lg K 0 f L x L - lg L 0 l Y - g(k - K X,L - L Y ) 0 f f f K L g g K L Usng results from chapter, RT X RT Y One Market,Two frms: same good X f (K, L ) + f (K, L ) K K + K and L L + L Wrte as: X f K, L ) + f ( K - K, L - ) ( L X K f K f + K 0 nce added captal for frm must come from frm f f K - f K
17 X f f - K K K and X f f - L L L 0 f f K f K f L f L Comparatve advantage (beneft from trade) Let total resources be fxed at 00. The followng PPf for countres: w wne, c cloth. 8w + 4c 00 w + c 00 England Portugal c RPT E - w Totally dfferentatef 8 dw + 4dc 0 - dc f 8dw -4dc f RPT E dw dc RPT P - dw Portugal has absolute cost advantage but England has a comparatve advantage n cloth. Pror to trade assume resources are dvded equally amount cloth and wne accordng to some preference functon: England: w 6.5 C.5 Portugal: w 5 C 5 England producton of only cloth c 5, Portugal w 70/ 35 and c 30/ 5 Total wne producton 35 > Total cloth producton > Exchange economy Fg. 6 Y
18 Effcency n product mx T(X, Y) f PPF (mplct) U X, Y + l(t(x, Y)) X U X T + l X 0 Y U Y + l T Y 0 l T (X,Y) 0 U X U Y T X T Y MR -dy/dx RPT fg. 5 Market mperfectons departng from P.C. Imperfect competton Market power Externaltes: thngs not accounted for n prces Publc goods Monopoly- Characterstcs A sngle seller. A sngle frm produces all ndustry output. The monopoly s the ndustry. Unque Product- Monopoly output s perceved by customers to be dstnctve and preferable to ts mperfect substtutes Blockaded entry and ext- Frms are heavly restrcted form enterng or leavng the ndustry Barrers to entry sources of monopoly Techncal barrers to entry declnng cost on relatve porton of cost curve (natural monopoly)
19 pecal knowledge ( protected ) Legal barrers Patents, Copyrghts Exclusve franchse (publc utlty) Creaton of barrers: buyng ownershp of unque lobbyng for legal protecton Imperfect dssemnaton of nformaton- Cost, prce, and product qualty nformaton are wthheld from unnformed buyers. Proft Max. lke all companes: MC MR Here monopolst face downward slopng demand curve. Fg. 7 MC P AC MR D Q Inverse elastcty rule at proft max. pont: (P MC)/P -/e P over MC Ths s called markup Proft: Fg. 8 MC P C A E MR AC D
20 Monopoly Market demand: Q 000 0P Inverse: P 00 Q/0 TC 0.05Q TR P*Q 00Q Q /0 MR 00 Q/0 MC 0.Q f Q * 500 and P * 75 TC 0.5(500) AC TC/Q 500/ P (P * - AC)*Q TR TC (75 45)* Markup prce over MC P 75 MC 0.Q 50 Markup Elastcty rule: e Q,p (dq/dp)*(p/q) -0*75/500-3 (P MC)/P /3 P 3/*MC How could output be affected f fxed cost ncreased? How could output be affected f varable cost ncreased? Allocaton of resources Compare wth Perfect Compatton Fg. 9 MC Transfer from C to P DWL AC
21 Fg. 30 A Area ABC: DWL B C MC AC MONOPOLY AND QUALITY Competton or monopoly power can be exercsed along other dmensons. Denote X as qualty, where: P P < 0 and > 0 Q X P P(Q, X)Q C(Q, X) Demand s a functon of Q and X Cost s a functon of Q and X P P( Q, X ) + Q - C 0 Q Q Q P Q - C X 0 X X The second st order condton states that the decrease revenue from a qualty decrease must equal the lower MC of the qualty ncrease. Compared to Perfect Competton they may actually have the same Q but dfferent X. PRICE DICRIMINATION Perfect P D.:( st degree) sell at max. prce to all, steel all consumer surplus: Fg. 3 Example: Consder the prevous case. How we wll sell to each at the max. prce?
22 What ths means s the LAT buyer wll buy exactly where MC P and that s how much Q we sell. P 00 Q/0 0.Q MC Q * 666 >500 TR Ú Q 0 * Q P( Q) dq 00Q TR 00(666) (666) /40 00(0) 0 / TC 0.05(666) P TR TC 3333 At the margn (last consumer) we sell at P MC 66.6 Market separaton (3 rd degree P.D) eparate nto markets. Max. Proft: P ( + ) Pj ( + ) MC f e e Fg. 3 j P P j Ê ˆ Á + Ë e j Ê ˆ Á + Ë e P j P AC MC Market : Q 4 P Market : Q 4 P ngle Prce under perfect competton pmc Total Q Q + Q where P P so Q 4 P + 4 P 48 3P fp6-(/3)q and MR 6 /3Q f MCAC 6 Then Q 5, P and P TR TC99 If 3rd degree prce dscrmnaton between the market s possble. MR 4 Q and MR Q MR MR MC f Q 9, Q 6, P 5, P 9 P TR +TR TC
23 P P Q +P Q AC*(Q) 9*5 + 9*6 6*5 99 where Q +Q 5 ngle Prce under perfect competton pmc Q 48 3P MR 6 /3Q Q 5, P Dead weght loss n market P w 0.5(P MC)*(Q PC Q ) 0.5(5 6)(8 9) 40.5 nce n market Q PC 8 f P MC 6 Dead weght loss n market DW 0.5(P MC)*(Q PC Q ) 0.5(9 6)( 6) 9 where Q PC n market DW + DW 49.5 DW loss sngle prce: 0.5(P MC)(Q PC Q) 0.5( 6)(30-5) 37.5 Q PC 30 Dscrmnaton through prce selecton nd degree prce dscrmnaton Quantty dscounts: - mnmum purchase requrements - cover charge - te-n sale Two part tarff (prce): Fxed fee added to per unt prce. An example s a cover charge then a per unt cost for drnks. so TR can be wrtten as T(Q) A + PQ Total prce per unt s T A P + P Q Q uppose we look at the demand curve agan n the 3 rd degree prce dscrmnaton case: Example: Q 4 P Q 4 P Under perfect competton P6, Q 8, Q Consumer surplus n the second market s C 0.5(-6)36. Because ths s the market segment wth the smallest demand ths s the most the prce dscrmnatng monopolst could charge 36 as cover charge (admsson)and prce of 6. P T( Q ) + T( Q ) AC*( Q +Q ) 7
24 P 36+6 Q Q 6*( Q +Q ) 7 Ths however s not the best prcng scheme. Note P A+A-(P-MC) *( Q +Q ) (A) should equal C for consumer at the hgher prce C.5(Q )(-P).5(4 P)(-P) o P *0.5(4 P)(-P)-(P-6) *( Q +Q ) Notng that demand s Q +Q 48-3P when they everyone s charged the same prce P *0.5(Q )(-P)-(P-6) *( 48-3P) P 8P-P results n P9, Q 5, Q 6 and A0.5(4 P)(-P)9 so T(Q)9+9Q P 8 whch s less 3 rd degree but has the aspect of farness snce all are charge the same.
25 Regulaton of Monopoly (fx graph) Fg. 33 P A C AC MR MC If AC above demand curve proft s not possble. Fg. 34 AC MR MC D Above Green Area Loss Below we have two set of consumer payng two prces one the monopoly prce the other where P AC Fg. 35 P P AC P 3 MR MC Here consumers payng P subsdze consumer payng P or P 3. RATE OF RETURN REGULATION Producton functon: Q f(k, L)
26 Pf (K,L) -WL K Pf ( K, L) -WL -VK Pf(K, L) WL VK + l (WL + K - Pf (K,L) If l 0 monopoly wthout regulaton If l ( - V)K t means the company should hre an nfnte amount of captal. If the rate of return s above the cost of captal (V). Hence 0 < l < * L Pf L -W + l (W - Pf L )0 * K Pf K - V + l ( - Pf K ) 0 * l WL - K - Pf (K,L) 0 For labor Pf L w, as wll hold for any frm whch proft maxmzes. The last formula s obtaned by addng and subtractng V/(-l) from the proceedng expresson. For captal: ( - l) Pf K V - l f Pf K V - l - l V l( -V ) - - l nce l < and > V Pf K <V whch means a regulated monopoly hres more captal than under an unregulated condton.(lower productvty) IMPERFECT COMPETITION Olgopoly A market structure characterzed by few sellers and nterdependent prce/output decsons Few sellers. A handful of frms produce the bulk of ndustry output. Homogeneous or unque product. Olgopoly output can be perceved as homogeneous or dstnctve. Blockaded entry and ext. Frm are heavly restrcted from enterng or leavng the ndustry. Imperfect dssemnaton of Informaton. Cost, prce and product qualty nformaton are wthheld from unnformed buyers. P f(q) f(q,+q +..+ q n ) Pq - TC q) f ( Q) q - TC ( q ) f ( q + q q ) q - TC ( q ) ( n
27 CARTEL MODEL Max. proft for market (lke monopoly) then splt legal. P PQ - [TC (q ) + TC (q ) +..+ TC n (q n )] q P + P q + q qn ) - MC ( q ) 0 MR( Q) - MC ( q ) 0 q ( Vablty:. legal. nformaton on demand and cost 3. Chslng (cheatng) DUOPOLY MODEL Cournot soluton Frm recognzes f q affects prce but does not realze prce change affects the competton s quantty. He beleves P q j 0 but 0 q q P he beleve n maxmzng the followng P + q - MC ( q ) 0 q q P o output wll be less then P.C. but snce q < 0 output s greater than under a q monopoly or cartel soluton. PRICE LEADERHIP One frms sets prce the other follows. Example: Natural prng Demand : Q q + q 0 P P 0 Q TC 0 P TR TC 0Q Q Cartel soluton: 0 - Q 0 Q Q 60, P 60, P 3600 Cournot
28 q q Assume each frm thnks. 0 q q P 0 q q P Pq (0 q q )q 0q q q q P Pq (0 q q )q 0q q q q q 0 - q - q 0 q 0 - q - q 0 These are called reacton functon; they show how each wll react to the other output level. q q 0 f q q f 0 q q 0 f 0 3q f q 40 q P 40 P 600 LEADERHIP One frm as leader set prces and the other follows: P P MC D Q L Q T tackelberg Leadershp Model q q (0 q )/ - q
29 q P Pq 0q q q q 0 - q - q - q 0 q q 0 3/q q 0 ubstute q (0 q )/ nto ths dervatve. 0 3/q 60 + q / 0 60 q 0 f q 60, q 30 P 30 P 800, P 900 tackelberg model does not say who should be the leader, f both act as a leader both wll produce Q C Q C + Q C > Q T Prce below P.C. If both are followers, cournot soluton. PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION How the product s perceved Heterogeneous Product group: Output of sets of frms consttute a product group f the substtutablty n demand among the products (cross prce elastcty) s very hgh relatve to other goods. Frm s choces: can choose how much to spend on dfferentates. TC TC I (q, z ) P g(q, P j, z, z j ) P P q TC (q, z ) q P + q P TC - q q 0 z P z q TC - z 0 b/c P dependes on q j & z j, the demand functon become complcated. patal dfferentaton Locaton choces
30 Monopolstc competton: bascally same assumptons as P.C. but wth product dfferentaton: Monopolstc Competton A market structure characterzed by a large number of sellers of dfferentated products. Characterstcs Large # of buyers and sellers. Each frm n the ndustry produces a small porton of ndustry output, and each customer buys only a small part of the total. Product heterogenety. The output of each frm s perceved by customers to be essentally dfferent from, though comparable wth, the output of other frms n the ndustry Free entry and ext. frms are not restrcted from enterng or leavng the ndustry Perfect dssemnaton of nformaton. Cost, prce, and product qualty nformaton s known by all buyers and all sellers n the market. MC AC D MR Ths proft brngs now frms a lower demand for your product untl zero proft: D Assume all frms have same TC C 9 + 4q ame demand
31 n- q -0.0(n -)P + 0.0 P j n f P P j then quantty has to equal q 303/n snce n- P j  P j (n -) If all P j are equal If so, then P. P (303/n) [9 + 4 *( 303/n)] For the moment lets gnore ths Pluggng n q and C n the proft functon P. P q - C We get n- È P q - c P -0.0(n -)P + 0.0 P j Í Î Í n q Pluggng the demand functon n for q and passng P thru we get È n- P Í -0.0(n -)P P Î Í Â P j P n È Ê n (n -)P + 0.0 P j ˆ Í Í Á Ë n Î [ ] Takng the dervatve w.r.t. P P P È Í- 0.0( n -)() P Î - 4 (- 0.0( n -)) 0 n  - P j n now set P P j P ( n -)() P + 0.0( n -) P + - 4( - 0.0( n -)) 0 P olvng for P ( n -) P - 0.0( n -) P - 4( - 0.0( n -)) n n
32 +0.0(n -)P 303 n P 303-4( -0.0(n -)) n 0.0(n -) - 4( -0.0(n -)) n( n -) f 4 P nce P q - C 0 for all Monopolstcally Compettve frms whch means we can plug our results for P and q we just got when P P J Ê P q - c Á Ë n(n -) + 4 ˆ Ê 303 ˆ Ê Á ˆ Á Ë n Ë n n 0, P P j 7, q 3, P I 0 To get ths result we need some ugly algebra afterward we we stll need to plug ths nto a programmable calculator. n (n ) *303 9n 3 9n n 3 n 30300*303/9 n(n n) Plug nto programmable calculator. n0. Game Theory. PERFECTLY CONTETABLE MARKET If entry and ext are freq. and/or outsde potental entrant can enter by cuttng prces and stll make proft. If such proft opportuntes exsted potental entrants would take advantage of them. Natural Monopoly TC 00Q Q P 000 5P P 00 0.Q MR Q MC 00
33 Q M 50 and P M 50 Contestable soluton: Here prce must equal average cost Q 000 5P 000 5(AC) 000 5( /Q) /Q f Q /Q 0 Q 500Q f Q C 400 P C 0 Nash Equlbrum Notaton U A (a *, b * ) U A (a, b * ) for all a à A And U B (a *, b * ) U B (a *, b ) for all b à B Ths frst equaton reads; the Utlty A receve from choosng a strategy of a* f B chooses b* s at least a great than when choosng a strategy of a when B chooses b*. Nash Equlbrum strateges A par of strateges (a *, b * ) represent an equlbrum soluton to a player game f a * s an optmal strategy gven the equaton above for A aganst b * and b * s an optmal strategy for B aganst a *. Consder the followng game wth a par of possble strateges. If A chooses L then he gets 7 unts of utlty f B also chooses L. If A chooses L and B chooses then A gets 6 utls. If A chooses then he gets 6 unts of utlty assumng B chooses L. If A chooses and B also chooses then A gets 6 utls. Now consder B. If B chooses L then he gets 5 unts of utlty f A also chooses L. If B chooses L and A chooses then A gets 4 utls. If B chooses then he gets 4 unts of utlty assumng A chooses L. If B chooses and A also chooses then B gets 3 utls. Dormtory Game (game tree) L 7.5 B L A 5.4 L B
34 The form of the decson tree mples B must choose after A. In ths case we assume B does not know what A has chosen. Below can be a smultaneous verson of the game above n normal form or one can move frst. Frst move A: L A L B Notce that B s always better off choosng L no matter what A chooses. Ths s B s domnant trategy. Therefore f A knows ths, he wll also chose L snce 7>6. The L and L strategy s a Nash equlbra. The other strateges do not offer a Nash equlbra snce n each one a player can mprove hs stuaton by agreeng to one strategy then swtchng. No Nash equlbrum: A B R P R 0,0,- -, -, 0,0,- P,- -, 0,0 The above game has no Nash equlbrum snce any combnaton of strateges poses a stuaton n whch one player can mprove hs stuaton by swtchng. Here there are two equlbra M B M. 00 A 00
35 If one chooses M then the other s better off also choosng M. If one chooses then the other s better of also choosng. There are Nash equlbra here. Mxed strateges: games wth only fnte strateges n whch the pure strateges are played wth certan probabltes. Lets assume the A wll chose M wth probablty (r) and wth probablty (-r). B wll chose M wth probablty (s) and wth probablty (-s). A M M B, 0,0 0,0, r -r s -s The expected utlty for A wll be E(U A )r*s* + r*(-s)*0 + (-r)*s*0 +(-r)*(-s)* E(U A )-r-s+3rs-s-r(3s-). If s>(/3) then A wll chose M (r). If s<(/3) then A wll chose (r0). If s(/3) A s ndfferent between and M snce E(U A )/3 n all stuatons. To see ths set r n the equaton above and compare t the stuaton where r0. -s-(3s-) -s-0(3s-). The same can be easly done for B. ee text. ub-game perfect equlbrum: a Nash equlbrum n whch the strategy choces of each player do not nvolve non-credble threats. That s, no strategy n such equlbrum requres a player to carry out an acton that would not be n ts nterest at the tme the choce s made. Repeated games: Bertrand Equlbrum Assumng equal MC, homogeneous goods.
36 The game conssts of each frm undercuttng ts rval untl they can now longer do so wthout makng profts negatve. The outcome wll be P A P B MC. Because f: P A P B > MC one can ncrease proft by lowerng prce. Notce the dfference under Cournot P > MC P MC Cournot Bertrand Infnte Bertrand Game If A chooses P A then B can choose P A > P B > MC and get all the market. If t s nfnte a twn trgger becomes possble P A P B P M where P M monopoly prce Now the queston s whether lowerng your prce ths perod s worth lower profts n all other perods. If not you receve than / of the monopoly proft from now on, f you cut proft you receve all monopoly profts ths perod and zero n the future. > ( m m d m d m d m The frm wll not cut ts prce as long as ) m < m Ê ˆ Á Ë- d Where d s the dscount factor. The /(-d) comes from the nfnte sum rule assumng monopoly proft stays the same each subsequent perod. If d>(/) then the frm wll not cut prces. If d(/) then the frm s ndfferent. Consder a stuaton wth more frms and the followng demand, MC, FC and proft. Q P MC 0, P m 40000, FC0 Wth more frms: m > ( m +d m +d m d m ) n
37 40000 > Ê ˆ Á n Ë -d f n - d < n ENTRY, EXIT AND TRATEGY Now consder the Cournot natural sprng example wth a fxed cost of $784. Assume further that A has frst mover advantage. The reacton functon of B s unchanged: (Only varable cost effects short run q.) q B (0 q A )/ fp 0 q A - q B P B Pq B 784 P(0 q A )/ 784 (0 q A q B )(0 q A )*/ 784 (0 q A )[0 q A (0 q A )(/)] Ê0 - q A ˆ f B Á Ë ettng proft of B to zero f (0 q A )*/ 8 o as long as q A 64 B wll not enter the market snce profts wll be zero or less. At the prce of 64 the profts for A are P A 56* Entry and ncomplete nformaton In ths case whether B enters depends on the subjectve prob. You assgn a probablty the exstng frm s hgh or low cost. P prob. of low cost and P prob. of hgh cost P B 3 f A s hgh cost P B - f A s low cost E(P B ) P*3 + ( P)*(-) f P>/4 E(P B )>0 so B enters It s therefore n A s nterest to make B beleve he s low cost weather he s or not. The problem occurs when B knows ths. He knows t s n your nterest to at low cost and you wll act ths way no matter what.
38 Predatory prces: Drvng others out of busness wth low prces. Then charge monopoly prces. Bayesan Nash Equlbrum: a strategy par a * b * wll be a Bayesan Nash equl. Provdng that a * maxmzes A expected utlty when B play b * and vse versa. [ ] " a` Ã A E[ U A (a *, b *, t A, t B )] Â B A (t B )U(a *,b *,t A,t B ) > E U A ( a,b *,t A,t B ) t B Where t B represents the type of player B may be. B A (t B ) s the subjectve probablty that A puts on B beng of a certan type. BAYEIAN NAH EQUIL. EXAMPLE: Inverse demand: P 00 q A - q B Assume ntally that MC A MC B 0 f q A q B 30 P A P B 900 Now assume Imperfect nformaton: MC A 0, MC B ether 6 or 4, unknown to A ubjectve prob. 50% for each so E(MC).5(6)+.5(4)0 nce MC s constant and equal to AC P B (P MC B )q B (00 q A q B - MC B )q B Proft max. P B q B 0. fq B * (00 - MC B q A )/ If B s hgh cost MC6 q BH * (84 q A )/ If B s hgh cost MC4 q BL * (96 q A )/ We can now calculate a expected proft. E(P A ) q A [0.5(00 MC A q A q BH ) + 0.5(00 MC A q A q BL )] E(P A ) (90 q A 0.5q BH 0.5q BL )q A Frst order condton P A q A 0 : f q A * (90 0.5q BH -0.5q BL )/ f q A 30, q BH 7, q BL 37 MECHANIM DEIGN AND AUCTION
39 Game theory can help obtan a desred results under varous economc stuatons. Consder an aucton wth economcs agents bddng. Let V A denote the value agent A places on the product and let V denote the same for agent. The goal of the seller of ths product s to get the best prce. The beneft(proft) for agent A s denote below. A beleve all other agents place a value on the product that s unformally dstrbuted between 0 and. If agent A bds hgher than anyone else then hs beneft s. P A (V A b A )Prob. (b A > b ) "..n-, Where If agent A does not have the hghest bd P A 0 f b > b A for any Prob. (b A > b,..n) Prob(b A > k V,,.,n) Where k s the fracton of the valuaton agent bds for the product. Now consder the followng property of the unform dstrbuton. Prob(b A > k V ) Prob(b A /k > V ) Therefore Ú b A k 0 dv A b A /k Prob. (b A > b,..n) ( b A ) b A b A... b A b n- A k k k k n- By symmetry we can conclude that k k " o the Expected proft of A s n- b A P A (V A b A ) k n- Maxmzng, the optmal bd for A should be. n- P A 0 n - f ba VA b A n k n-
40
41
3.2. Cournot Model Cournot Model
Matlde Machado Assumptons: All frms produce an homogenous product The market prce s therefore the result of the total supply (same prce for all frms) Frms decde smultaneously how much to produce Quantty
More informationLecture Notes, January 11, 2010
Economcs 200B UCSD Wnter 2010 Lecture otes, January 11, 2010 Partal equlbrum comparatve statcs Partal equlbrum: Market for one good only wth supply and demand as a functon of prce. Prce s defned as the
More informationPrice competition with capacity constraints. Consumers are rationed at the low-price firm. But who are the rationed ones?
Prce competton wth capacty constrants Consumers are ratoned at the low-prce frm. But who are the ratoned ones? As before: two frms; homogeneous goods. Effcent ratonng If p < p and q < D(p ), then the resdual
More informationCopyright (C) 2008 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the Creative
Copyrght (C) 008 Davd K. Levne Ths document s an open textbook; you can redstrbute t and/or modfy t under the terms of the Creatve Commons Attrbuton Lcense. Compettve Equlbrum wth Pure Exchange n traders
More informationIn the figure below, the point d indicates the location of the consumer that is under competition. Transportation costs are given by td.
UC Berkeley Economcs 11 Sprng 006 Prof. Joseph Farrell / GSI: Jenny Shanefelter Problem Set # - Suggested Solutons. 1.. In ths problem, we are extendng the usual Hotellng lne so that now t runs from [-a,
More information,, MRTS is the marginal rate of technical substitution
Mscellaneous Notes on roducton Economcs ompled by eter F Orazem September 9, 00 I Implcatons of conve soquants Two nput case, along an soquant 0 along an soquant Slope of the soquant,, MRTS s the margnal
More informationCS286r Assign One. Answer Key
CS286r Assgn One Answer Key 1 Game theory 1.1 1.1.1 Let off-equlbrum strateges also be that people contnue to play n Nash equlbrum. Devatng from any Nash equlbrum s a weakly domnated strategy. That s,
More informationCournot Equilibrium with N firms
Recap Last class (September 8, Thursday) Examples of games wth contnuous acton sets Tragedy of the commons Duopoly models: ournot o class on Sept. 13 due to areer Far Today (September 15, Thursday) Duopoly
More informationOnline Appendix. t=1 (p t w)q t. Then the first order condition shows that
Artcle forthcomng to ; manuscrpt no (Please, provde the manuscrpt number!) 1 Onlne Appendx Appendx E: Proofs Proof of Proposton 1 Frst we derve the equlbrum when the manufacturer does not vertcally ntegrate
More informationThe oligopolistic markets
ernando Branco 006-007 all Quarter Sesson 5 Part II The olgopolstc markets There are a few supplers. Outputs are homogenous or dfferentated. Strategc nteractons are very mportant: Supplers react to each
More informationMixed Taxation and Production Efficiency
Floran Scheuer 2/23/2016 Mxed Taxaton and Producton Effcency 1 Overvew 1. Unform commodty taxaton under non-lnear ncome taxaton Atknson-Stgltz (JPubE 1976) Theorem Applcaton to captal taxaton 2. Unform
More informationMarket structure and Innovation
Market structure and Innovaton Ths presentaton s based on the paper Market structure and Innovaton authored by Glenn C. Loury, publshed n The Quarterly Journal of Economcs, Vol. 93, No.3 ( Aug 1979) I.
More informationA NOTE ON CES FUNCTIONS Drago Bergholt, BI Norwegian Business School 2011
A NOTE ON CES FUNCTIONS Drago Bergholt, BI Norwegan Busness School 2011 Functons featurng constant elastcty of substtuton CES are wdely used n appled economcs and fnance. In ths note, I do two thngs. Frst,
More informationk t+1 + c t A t k t, t=0
Macro II (UC3M, MA/PhD Econ) Professor: Matthas Kredler Fnal Exam 6 May 208 You have 50 mnutes to complete the exam There are 80 ponts n total The exam has 4 pages If somethng n the queston s unclear,
More informationHila Etzion. Min-Seok Pang
RESERCH RTICLE COPLEENTRY ONLINE SERVICES IN COPETITIVE RKETS: INTINING PROFITILITY IN THE PRESENCE OF NETWORK EFFECTS Hla Etzon Department of Technology and Operatons, Stephen. Ross School of usness,
More informationCredit Card Pricing and Impact of Adverse Selection
Credt Card Prcng and Impact of Adverse Selecton Bo Huang and Lyn C. Thomas Unversty of Southampton Contents Background Aucton model of credt card solctaton - Errors n probablty of beng Good - Errors n
More informationEndogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly consisting of a single public firm and foreign competitors. Abstract
Endogenous tmng n a mxed olgopoly consstng o a sngle publc rm and oregn compettors Yuanzhu Lu Chna Economcs and Management Academy, Central Unversty o Fnance and Economcs Abstract We nvestgate endogenous
More informationThe Second Anti-Mathima on Game Theory
The Second Ant-Mathma on Game Theory Ath. Kehagas December 1 2006 1 Introducton In ths note we wll examne the noton of game equlbrum for three types of games 1. 2-player 2-acton zero-sum games 2. 2-player
More informationEconomics 101. Lecture 4 - Equilibrium and Efficiency
Economcs 0 Lecture 4 - Equlbrum and Effcency Intro As dscussed n the prevous lecture, we wll now move from an envronment where we looed at consumers mang decsons n solaton to analyzng economes full of
More informationProblem Set 4: Sketch of Solutions
Problem Set 4: Sketc of Solutons Informaton Economcs (Ec 55) George Georgads Due n class or by e-mal to quel@bu.edu at :30, Monday, December 8 Problem. Screenng A monopolst can produce a good n dfferent
More informationWelfare Properties of General Equilibrium. What can be said about optimality properties of resource allocation implied by general equilibrium?
APPLIED WELFARE ECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS Welfare Propertes of General Equlbrum What can be sad about optmalty propertes of resource allocaton mpled by general equlbrum? Any crteron used to compare
More informationModule 17: Mechanism Design & Optimal Auctions
Module 7: Mechansm Desgn & Optmal Auctons Informaton Economcs (Ec 55) George Georgads Examples: Auctons Blateral trade Producton and dstrbuton n socety General Setup N agents Each agent has prvate nformaton
More informationEconomics 2450A: Public Economics Section 10: Education Policies and Simpler Theory of Capital Taxation
Economcs 2450A: Publc Economcs Secton 10: Educaton Polces and Smpler Theory of Captal Taxaton Matteo Parads November 14, 2016 In ths secton we study educaton polces n a smplfed verson of framework analyzed
More informationPricing and Resource Allocation Game Theoretic Models
Prcng and Resource Allocaton Game Theoretc Models Zhy Huang Changbn Lu Q Zhang Computer and Informaton Scence December 8, 2009 Z. Huang, C. Lu, and Q. Zhang (CIS) Game Theoretc Models December 8, 2009
More information(1 ) (1 ) 0 (1 ) (1 ) 0
Appendx A Appendx A contans proofs for resubmsson "Contractng Informaton Securty n the Presence of Double oral Hazard" Proof of Lemma 1: Assume that, to the contrary, BS efforts are achevable under a blateral
More informationAssortment Optimization under MNL
Assortment Optmzaton under MNL Haotan Song Aprl 30, 2017 1 Introducton The assortment optmzaton problem ams to fnd the revenue-maxmzng assortment of products to offer when the prces of products are fxed.
More informationEquilibrium with Complete Markets. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko
Equlbrum wth Complete Markets Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko 1 / 33 Readngs Ljungqvst and Sargent. Recursve Macroeconomc Theory. MIT Press. Chapter 8. 2 / 33 Equlbrum n pure exchange, nfnte horzon economes,
More informationConjectures in Cournot Duopoly under Cost Uncertainty
Conjectures n Cournot Duopoly under Cost Uncertanty Suyeol Ryu and Iltae Km * Ths paper presents a Cournot duopoly model based on a condton when frms are facng cost uncertanty under rsk neutralty and rsk
More informationGames and Market Imperfections
Games and Market Imperfectons Q: The mxed complementarty (MCP) framework s effectve for modelng perfect markets, but can t handle mperfect markets? A: At least part of the tme A partcular type of game/market
More informationEnvironmental taxation: Privatization with Different Public Firm s Objective Functions
Appl. Math. Inf. Sc. 0 No. 5 657-66 (06) 657 Appled Mathematcs & Informaton Scences An Internatonal Journal http://dx.do.org/0.8576/ams/00503 Envronmental taxaton: Prvatzaton wth Dfferent Publc Frm s Objectve
More informationA Cournot-Stackelberg Advertising Duopoly Derived From A Cobb-Douglas Utility Function
MDEF Workshop 01, Urbno, 0- September A Cournot-Stackelberg Advertsng Duopoly Derved From A Cobb-Douglas Utlty Functon Alna Ghrvu * and Tönu Puu** *Faculty of Economc Studes and Busness Admnstraton, Babeş-
More informationf(x,y) = (4(x 2 4)x,2y) = 0 H(x,y) =
Problem Set 3: Unconstraned mzaton n R N. () Fnd all crtcal ponts of f(x,y) (x 4) +y and show whch are ma and whch are mnma. () Fnd all crtcal ponts of f(x,y) (y x ) x and show whch are ma and whch are
More informationSupporting Information for: Two Monetary Models with Alternating Markets
Supportng Informaton for: Two Monetary Models wth Alternatng Markets Gabrele Camera Chapman Unversty & Unversty of Basel YL Chen St. Lous Fed November 2015 1 Optmal choces n the CIA model On date t, gven
More informationSupporting Materials for: Two Monetary Models with Alternating Markets
Supportng Materals for: Two Monetary Models wth Alternatng Markets Gabrele Camera Chapman Unversty Unversty of Basel YL Chen Federal Reserve Bank of St. Lous 1 Optmal choces n the CIA model On date t,
More informationUniversity of California, Davis Date: June 22, 2009 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D.
Unversty of Calforna, Davs Date: June 22, 29 Department of Agrcultural and Resource Economcs Department of Economcs Tme: 5 hours Mcroeconomcs Readng Tme: 2 mnutes PRELIMIARY EXAMIATIO FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE
More informationCS294 Topics in Algorithmic Game Theory October 11, Lecture 7
CS294 Topcs n Algorthmc Game Theory October 11, 2011 Lecture 7 Lecturer: Chrstos Papadmtrou Scrbe: Wald Krchene, Vjay Kamble 1 Exchange economy We consder an exchange market wth m agents and n goods. Agent
More informationRyan (2009)- regulating a concentrated industry (cement) Firms play Cournot in the stage. Make lumpy investment decisions
1 Motvaton Next we consder dynamc games where the choce varables are contnuous and/or dscrete. Example 1: Ryan (2009)- regulatng a concentrated ndustry (cement) Frms play Cournot n the stage Make lumpy
More informationWeek3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity
Week3, Chapter 4 Moton n Two Dmensons Lecture Quz A partcle confned to moton along the x axs moves wth constant acceleraton from x =.0 m to x = 8.0 m durng a 1-s tme nterval. The velocty of the partcle
More informationWinter 2008 CS567 Stochastic Linear/Integer Programming Guest Lecturer: Xu, Huan
Wnter 2008 CS567 Stochastc Lnear/Integer Programmng Guest Lecturer: Xu, Huan Class 2: More Modelng Examples 1 Capacty Expanson Capacty expanson models optmal choces of the tmng and levels of nvestments
More informationHow Strong Are Weak Patents? Joseph Farrell and Carl Shapiro. Supplementary Material Licensing Probabilistic Patents to Cournot Oligopolists *
How Strong Are Weak Patents? Joseph Farrell and Carl Shapro Supplementary Materal Lcensng Probablstc Patents to Cournot Olgopolsts * September 007 We study here the specal case n whch downstream competton
More informationUnit 5: Government policy in competitive markets I E ciency
Unt 5: Government polcy n compettve markets I E cency Prof. Antono Rangel January 2, 2016 1 Pareto optmal allocatons 1.1 Prelmnares Bg pcture Consumers: 1,...,C,eachw/U,W Frms: 1,...,F,eachw/C ( ) Consumers
More information1 The Sidrauski model
The Sdrausk model There are many ways to brng money nto the macroeconomc debate. Among the fundamental ssues n economcs the treatment of money s probably the LESS satsfactory and there s very lttle agreement
More informationLecture 3: Probability Distributions
Lecture 3: Probablty Dstrbutons Random Varables Let us begn by defnng a sample space as a set of outcomes from an experment. We denote ths by S. A random varable s a functon whch maps outcomes nto the
More informationGames of Threats. Elon Kohlberg Abraham Neyman. Working Paper
Games of Threats Elon Kohlberg Abraham Neyman Workng Paper 18-023 Games of Threats Elon Kohlberg Harvard Busness School Abraham Neyman The Hebrew Unversty of Jerusalem Workng Paper 18-023 Copyrght 2017
More informationPerfect Competition and the Nash Bargaining Solution
Perfect Competton and the Nash Barganng Soluton Renhard John Department of Economcs Unversty of Bonn Adenauerallee 24-42 53113 Bonn, Germany emal: rohn@un-bonn.de May 2005 Abstract For a lnear exchange
More informationProductivity and Reallocation
Productvty and Reallocaton Motvaton Recent studes hghlght role of reallocaton for productvty growth. Market economes exhbt: Large pace of output and nput reallocaton wth substantal role for entry/ext.
More informationOn endogenous Stackelberg leadership: The case of horizontally differentiated duopoly and asymmetric net work compatibility effects
On endogenous Stackelberg leadershp: The case of horzontally dfferentated duopoly and asymmetrc net work compatblty effects Tsuyosh TOSHIMITSU School of Economcs,Kwanse Gakun Unversty Abstract Introducng
More informationAllocative Efficiency Measurement with Endogenous Prices
Allocatve Effcency Measurement wth Endogenous Prces Andrew L. Johnson Texas A&M Unversty John Ruggero Unversty of Dayton December 29, 200 Abstract In the nonparametrc measurement of allocatve effcency,
More informationQuantity Precommitment and Cournot and Bertrand Models with Complementary Goods
Quantty Precommtment and Cournot and Bertrand Models wth Complementary Goods Kazuhro Ohnsh 1 Insttute for Basc Economc Scence, Osaka, Japan Abstract Ths paper nestgates Cournot and Bertrand duopoly models
More informatione - c o m p a n i o n
OPERATIONS RESEARCH http://dxdoorg/0287/opre007ec e - c o m p a n o n ONLY AVAILABLE IN ELECTRONIC FORM 202 INFORMS Electronc Companon Generalzed Quantty Competton for Multple Products and Loss of Effcency
More informationTHE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM. We should thank the Chinese for their wonderful remainder theorem. Glenn Stevens
THE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM KEITH CONRAD We should thank the Chnese for ther wonderful remander theorem. Glenn Stevens 1. Introducton The Chnese remander theorem says we can unquely solve any par of
More informationProblem Set 3. 1 Offshoring as a Rybzcynski Effect. Economics 245 Fall 2011 International Trade
Due: Thu, December 1, 2011 Instructor: Marc-Andreas Muendler E-mal: muendler@ucsd.edu Economcs 245 Fall 2011 Internatonal Trade Problem Set 3 November 15, 2011 1 Offshorng as a Rybzcynsk Effect There are
More informationInvestment Secrecy and Competitive R&D
BE J. Econ. nal. Polcy 2016; aop Letter dt Sengupta* Investment Secrecy and Compettve R&D DOI 10.1515/beeap-2016-0047 bstract: Secrecy about nvestment n research and development (R&D) can promote greater
More informationComparative Advantage and Optimal Trade Taxes
Comparatve Advantage and Optmal Trade Taxes Arnaud Costnot (MIT), Dave Donaldson (MIT), Jonathan Vogel (Columba) and Iván Wernng (MIT) June 2014 Motvaton Two central questons... 1. Why do natons trade?
More informationConstant Best-Response Functions: Interpreting Cournot
Internatonal Journal of Busness and Economcs, 009, Vol. 8, No., -6 Constant Best-Response Functons: Interpretng Cournot Zvan Forshner Department of Economcs, Unversty of Hafa, Israel Oz Shy * Research
More informationVickrey Auction VCG Combinatorial Auctions. Mechanism Design. Algorithms and Data Structures. Winter 2016
Mechansm Desgn Algorthms and Data Structures Wnter 2016 1 / 39 Vckrey Aucton Vckrey-Clarke-Groves Mechansms Sngle-Mnded Combnatoral Auctons 2 / 39 Mechansm Desgn (wth Money) Set A of outcomes to choose
More informationNUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION
NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION 1 Introducton Dfferentaton s a method to compute the rate at whch a dependent output y changes wth respect to the change n the ndependent nput x. Ths rate of change s called the
More informationWelfare Analysis of Cournot and Bertrand Competition With(out) Investment in R & D
MPRA Munch Personal RePEc Archve Welfare Analyss of Cournot and Bertrand Competton Wth(out) Investment n R & D Jean-Baptste Tondj Unversty of Ottawa 25 March 2016 Onlne at https://mpra.ub.un-muenchen.de/75806/
More informationTit-For-Tat Equilibria in Discounted Repeated Games with. Private Monitoring
1 Tt-For-Tat Equlbra n Dscounted Repeated Games wth Prvate Montorng Htosh Matsushma 1 Department of Economcs, Unversty of Tokyo 2 Aprl 24, 2007 Abstract We nvestgate nfntely repeated games wth mperfect
More informationStructure and Drive Paul A. Jensen Copyright July 20, 2003
Structure and Drve Paul A. Jensen Copyrght July 20, 2003 A system s made up of several operatons wth flow passng between them. The structure of the system descrbes the flow paths from nputs to outputs.
More informationx i1 =1 for all i (the constant ).
Chapter 5 The Multple Regresson Model Consder an economc model where the dependent varable s a functon of K explanatory varables. The economc model has the form: y = f ( x,x,..., ) xk Approxmate ths by
More information2E Pattern Recognition Solutions to Introduction to Pattern Recognition, Chapter 2: Bayesian pattern classification
E395 - Pattern Recognton Solutons to Introducton to Pattern Recognton, Chapter : Bayesan pattern classfcaton Preface Ths document s a soluton manual for selected exercses from Introducton to Pattern Recognton
More informationInternational Macroeconomics #4 Pricing to market
Internatonal Macroeconomcs #4 rcng to market. rologue: Marshall-Lerner-Robnson 2. Incomplete pass-through n a smple olgopolstc model 3. TM n monopolstc competton Bénassy-Quéré - Internatonal Macroeconomcs
More informationPROBLEM SET 7 GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM
PROBLEM SET 7 GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM Queston a Defnton: An Arrow-Debreu Compettve Equlbrum s a vector of prces {p t } and allocatons {c t, c 2 t } whch satsfes ( Gven {p t }, c t maxmzes βt ln c t subject
More informationWelfare Comparisons with a Consumer-Friendly Upstream Firm: Centralized vs. Decentralized Bargaining
Open Journal of Socal Scences 07 5 8-97 http://www.scrp.org/ournal/ss ISSN Onlne: 37-5960 ISSN Prnt: 37-595 Welfare Comparsons wth a Consumer-Frendly Upstream Frm: Centralzed vs. Decentralzed Barganng
More informationNotes on Kehoe Perri, Econometrica 2002
Notes on Kehoe Perr, Econometrca 2002 Jonathan Heathcote November 2nd 2005 There s nothng n these notes that s not n Kehoe Perr NBER Workng Paper 7820 or Kehoe and Perr Econometrca 2002. However, I have
More informationLet p z be the price of z and p 1 and p 2 be the prices of the goods making up y. In general there is no problem in grouping goods.
Economcs 90 Prce Theory ON THE QUESTION OF SEPARABILITY What we would lke to be able to do s estmate demand curves by segmentng consumers purchases nto groups. In one applcaton, we aggregate purchases
More informationMergers among leaders and mergers among followers. Abstract
Mergers among leaders and mergers among followers John S. Heywood Unversty of Wsconsn - Mlwaukee Matthew McGnty Unversty of Wsconsn-Mlwaukee Abstract We are the frst to confrm that suffcent cost convexty
More informationTemperature. Chapter Heat Engine
Chapter 3 Temperature In prevous chapters of these notes we ntroduced the Prncple of Maxmum ntropy as a technque for estmatng probablty dstrbutons consstent wth constrants. In Chapter 9 we dscussed the
More informationEcon674 Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment
Econ674 Economcs of Natural Resources and the Envronment Sesson 7 Exhaustble Resource Dynamc An Introducton to Exhaustble Resource Prcng 1. The dstncton between nonrenewable and renewable resources can
More informationInner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal
Inner Product Defnton 1 () A Eucldean space s a fnte-dmensonal vector space over the reals R, wth an nner product,. Defnton 2 (Inner Product) An nner product, on a real vector space X s a symmetrc, blnear,
More informationCOMPARISON OF SOME RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN REDUNDANT SYSTEMS REQUIRING SUPPORTING UNITS FOR THEIR OPERATIONS
Avalable onlne at http://sck.org J. Math. Comput. Sc. 3 (3), No., 6-3 ISSN: 97-537 COMPARISON OF SOME RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN REDUNDANT SYSTEMS REQUIRING SUPPORTING UNITS FOR THEIR OPERATIONS
More informationTest code: ME I/ME II, 2007
Test code: ME I/ME II, 007 Syllabus for ME I, 007 Matrx Algebra: Matrces and Vectors, Matrx Operatons. Permutaton and Combnaton. Calculus: Functons, Lmts, Contnuty, Dfferentaton of functons of one or more
More informationUpstream competition. Stéphane Caprice Toulouse School of Economics
Upstream competton and buyer mergers Stéphane Caprce Toulouse School of Economcs GREMAQ-IRA 1 Buyer frms often merge n order to obtan lower prces from supplers What s the contrbuton of ths paper? Explan
More informationA. Perfect Competition 1. Study Paradigm of Market (Industrial Organization) Market Structure (S) / Behaviors or Conduct (C) / Performance (P)
Lecture 07 Market Structure (I) A. erfect Competton. Study aradgm of Market (Industral Organzaton) Market Structure (S) / Behavors or Conduct (C) / erformance (). erfect Competton Condtons or Assumptons
More informationSolution Thermodynamics
Soluton hermodynamcs usng Wagner Notaton by Stanley. Howard Department of aterals and etallurgcal Engneerng South Dakota School of nes and echnology Rapd Cty, SD 57701 January 7, 001 Soluton hermodynamcs
More informationModelli Clamfim Equazione del Calore Lezione ottobre 2014
CLAMFIM Bologna Modell 1 @ Clamfm Equazone del Calore Lezone 17 15 ottobre 2014 professor Danele Rtell danele.rtell@unbo.t 1/24? Convoluton The convoluton of two functons g(t) and f(t) s the functon (g
More informationDO NOT OPEN THE QUESTION PAPER UNTIL INSTRUCTED TO DO SO BY THE CHIEF INVIGILATOR. Introductory Econometrics 1 hour 30 minutes
25/6 Canddates Only January Examnatons 26 Student Number: Desk Number:...... DO NOT OPEN THE QUESTION PAPER UNTIL INSTRUCTED TO DO SO BY THE CHIEF INVIGILATOR Department Module Code Module Ttle Exam Duraton
More informationPrice Discrimination of Digital Content
Prce Dscrmnaton of Dgtal Content Prce Dscrmnaton of Dgtal Content Koj Domon Faculty of Socal Scences, Waseda Unversty -6- Nshwaseda, Shnjuku-ku, Tokyo 69-8050, Japan Tel/Fax: +8 3 5286-45, E-mal: domon@waseda.jp
More informationj) = 1 (note sigma notation) ii. Continuous random variable (e.g. Normal distribution) 1. density function: f ( x) 0 and f ( x) dx = 1
Random varables Measure of central tendences and varablty (means and varances) Jont densty functons and ndependence Measures of assocaton (covarance and correlaton) Interestng result Condtonal dstrbutons
More informationChapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems
Numercal Analyss by Dr. Anta Pal Assstant Professor Department of Mathematcs Natonal Insttute of Technology Durgapur Durgapur-713209 emal: anta.bue@gmal.com 1 . Chapter 5 Soluton of System of Lnear Equatons
More informationCan the Market be Fixed? (II) Does the Market Need Fixing? The Beneficent Effects of Assigning Property Rights. The Coase Theorem
Eternaltes An eternalt occurs whenever the actvtes of one economc agent affect the actvtes of another agent n was that are not taken nto account b the operaton of the market. Eamples: One frm produces
More informationStanford University CS359G: Graph Partitioning and Expanders Handout 4 Luca Trevisan January 13, 2011
Stanford Unversty CS359G: Graph Parttonng and Expanders Handout 4 Luca Trevsan January 3, 0 Lecture 4 In whch we prove the dffcult drecton of Cheeger s nequalty. As n the past lectures, consder an undrected
More informationa. (All your answers should be in the letter!
Econ 301 Blkent Unversty Taskn Econometrcs Department of Economcs Md Term Exam I November 8, 015 Name For each hypothess testng n the exam complete the followng steps: Indcate the test statstc, ts crtcal
More informationCHARACTERISTICS OF COMPLEX SEPARATION SCHEMES AND AN ERROR OF SEPARATION PRODUCTS OUTPUT DETERMINATION
Górnctwo Geonżynera Rok 0 Zeszyt / 006 Igor Konstantnovch Mladetskj * Petr Ivanovch Plov * Ekaterna Nkolaevna Kobets * Tasya Igorevna Markova * CHARACTERISTICS OF COMPLEX SEPARATION SCHEMES AND AN ERROR
More informationLINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity
LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS MODULE IX Lecture - 30 Multcollnearty Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematcs and Statstcs Indan Insttute of Technology Kanpur 2 Remedes for multcollnearty Varous technques have
More informationLectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix
Lectures - Week 4 Matrx norms, Condtonng, Vector Spaces, Lnear Independence, Spannng sets and Bass, Null space and Range of a Matrx Matrx Norms Now we turn to assocatng a number to each matrx. We could
More informationThe Gaussian classifier. Nuno Vasconcelos ECE Department, UCSD
he Gaussan classfer Nuno Vasconcelos ECE Department, UCSD Bayesan decson theory recall that we have state of the world X observatons g decson functon L[g,y] loss of predctng y wth g Bayes decson rule s
More informationChapter 13: Multiple Regression
Chapter 13: Multple Regresson 13.1 Developng the multple-regresson Model The general model can be descrbed as: It smplfes for two ndependent varables: The sample ft parameter b 0, b 1, and b are used to
More informationPROBABILITY PRIMER. Exercise Solutions
PROBABILITY PRIMER Exercse Solutons 1 Probablty Prmer, Exercse Solutons, Prncples of Econometrcs, e EXERCISE P.1 (b) X s a random varable because attendance s not known pror to the outdoor concert. Before
More informationIntroduction to Vapor/Liquid Equilibrium, part 2. Raoult s Law:
CE304, Sprng 2004 Lecture 4 Introducton to Vapor/Lqud Equlbrum, part 2 Raoult s Law: The smplest model that allows us do VLE calculatons s obtaned when we assume that the vapor phase s an deal gas, and
More informationLimited Dependent Variables
Lmted Dependent Varables. What f the left-hand sde varable s not a contnuous thng spread from mnus nfnty to plus nfnty? That s, gven a model = f (, β, ε, where a. s bounded below at zero, such as wages
More informationFinancing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants
Fnancng Innovaton: Evdence from R&D Grants Sabrna T. Howell Onlne Appendx Fgure 1: Number of Applcants Note: Ths fgure shows the number of losng and wnnng Phase 1 grant applcants over tme by offce (Energy
More informationCHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE
CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE Analytcal soluton s usually not possble when exctaton vares arbtrarly wth tme or f the system s nonlnear. Such problems can be solved by numercal tmesteppng
More informationOnline Appendix: Reciprocity with Many Goods
T D T A : O A Kyle Bagwell Stanford Unversty and NBER Robert W. Stager Dartmouth College and NBER March 2016 Abstract Ths onlne Appendx extends to a many-good settng the man features of recprocty emphaszed
More information3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X
Statstcs 1: Probablty Theory II 37 3 EPECTATION OF SEVERAL RANDOM VARIABLES As n Probablty Theory I, the nterest n most stuatons les not on the actual dstrbuton of a random vector, but rather on a number
More informationOpen Systems: Chemical Potential and Partial Molar Quantities Chemical Potential
Open Systems: Chemcal Potental and Partal Molar Quanttes Chemcal Potental For closed systems, we have derved the followng relatonshps: du = TdS pdv dh = TdS + Vdp da = SdT pdv dg = VdP SdT For open systems,
More informationProtection as insurance: Risk aversion, terms of trade uncertainty and optimal trade policy
Protecton as nsurance: Rsk averson, terms of trade uncertanty and optmal trade polcy Ton Glaser KU Leuven Gerald Wllmann KU Leuven August 5, 202 We propose a model n whch producers and consumers face uncertanty
More informationMoments of Inertia. and reminds us of the analogous equation for linear momentum p= mv, which is of the form. The kinetic energy of the body is.
Moments of Inerta Suppose a body s movng on a crcular path wth constant speed Let s consder two quanttes: the body s angular momentum L about the center of the crcle, and ts knetc energy T How are these
More informationModule 9. Lecture 6. Duality in Assignment Problems
Module 9 1 Lecture 6 Dualty n Assgnment Problems In ths lecture we attempt to answer few other mportant questons posed n earler lecture for (AP) and see how some of them can be explaned through the concept
More information