Spacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods in One Framework
|
|
- Dora Hawkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 4, No. ists3, pp. Pd_5-Pd_, 6 Spacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods in One Framework y Takahiro SASAKI,), Takashi SHIMOMURA ) and Sayaka KANATA ) ) Department of Aerospace Engineering, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan ) Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Received July st, 5) Satellite dynamics is described by a nonlinear differential equation. Most of recent studies about attitude control have used nonlinear controllers. However, with these controllers, control performance is ignored in most cases. To overcome these problems, we applied Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) control theory to attitude control problem. To avoid difficulties coming from the nonlinearity in satellite dynamics, we modeled dynamics of spacecraft as an LPV system and applied a Gain-Scheduled (GS) controller to this model using Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs). In this paper, by using two methods, GS controllers are designed to guarantee overall stability and to achieve H performance with distinct Lyapunov solutions. y using these controllers, 3-axis attitude control of a spacecraft with Reaction Wheels (RWs) shall be achieved. To examine how the proposed approach improves the control performance, two proposed methods shall be compared with each other. Key Words: Attitude Control, RW, LPV, Gain-Scheduled Control Nomenclature J : inertia matrix of the spacecraft I ws : inertia matrices of wheel spin axis q : quaternion (Euler Parameters) ω : angular velocity vector of the spacecraft Ω : wheel spin rate vector G s : spin axis matrix F : body fixed-frame ρ : scheduling parameter vector Subscripts : initial e : error d : desired Superscripts : skew-symmetric : conjugate. Introduction In recent years, attitude control of spacecraft has been studied extensively. They deal with several kinds of actuators such as Momentum Exchange Devices (MEDs) and external torque generators (e. g. gas jets or magnetic torquers). External torque generators have disadvantages such as limited resources or small torque. MEDs have been used for complete attitude control of spacecraft as actuators, in which they do not require fuel. Since Reaction Wheels (RWs) can generate control torque precisely, RWs in MEDs are often used for attitude control of spacecraft. Therefore, in this paper, we mainly focus on RWs to realize complete attitude control. Most of recent studies use Lyapunov function-based controllers to realize attitude control. )- 3) With Lyapunov functionbased controllers, overall stability of attitude control is always guaranteed, however, control performance is hard to evaluate. To overcome this problem, few studies 4)- 7) are attained complete attitude control with Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) control theory. In LPV control theory, we modeled the dynamics of a spacecraft as an LPV system and applied a Gain- Scheduled (GS) controller to this model using Linear Matrix 8), 9) Inequalities (LMIs). In this paper, to avoid the difficulty from excess of the number of scheduling parameters in the LPV system, we shall introduce two methods. The first one is the Parameter-Dependent Coordinate Transformation (PDCT) method, which introduces a virtual state variable together with a parameter-dependent coordinate transformation. 6) With this method, the original plant (Dynamics + Kinematics) can be transformed into a simple LPV model, which is covered with fewer vertices, compared to the original plant. The controller to this simple LPV model can be designed much easily, since the number of vertices considerably decreases. y getting back the coordinate transformation, a controller to the original plant can be obtained. The second one is the approximation of the final error quaternion value (AQ) method. 7) With this method, the original plant can be approximated into a simple LPV model by using the approximation of the final error quaternion value in kinematics of the original plant. After that, GS controllers are designed to guarantee overall stability and to achieve H performance with distinct Lyapunov solutions. Through some numerical simulations, we show the differences of control performance between the PDCT method and the AQ one. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section, we show a brief overview of the dynamics and the kinematics of a spacecraft. In Section 3, the generalized LPV model of spacecraft dynamics with multi-meds shall be established. Section 4 presents two methods (PDCT and AQ) to design the GS controller easily. In Section 5, numerical simulations us- Copyright 6 by the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences and ISTS. All rights reserved. Pd_5
2 Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 4, No. ists3 (6) ing two proposed methods are given to show the effectiveness and comparison between them. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper. q T q = ˆα T ˆα sin Θ + cos Θ =. (6). Spacecraft Model In this paper, we deal with a spacecraft with RWs as shown in Fig.. In this section, a dynamics equation of a spacecraft with RWs is presented. After that, a kinematics equation based on the quaternion is described... Dynamics The spacecraft considered in this paper is assumed to be a rigid body. The body fixed-frame F is represented by a set of unit vectors ˆx, ŷ, and ẑ. We assume that all the RWs have the same moment of inertia I ws. Using the definition in Nomenclature, the total angular momentum of a spacecraft with RWs is given as follows: H = Jω + G s I ws Ω. () Under the assumption that the spacecraft is not applied by any external disturbance torque, the dynamics is given by Ḣ + ω H =. () Substituting Eq. () into the first term of Eq. (), we have J ω + G s I ws Ω + ω H = (3) where the notation x denotes the following skew-symmetric matrix: x 3 x x := x 3 x, x = x x x 3 ] T. (4) x x This is the dynamics of a spacecraft with multi-rws... Kinematics The quaternion consists of the vector part and the scalar one. Given the principal rotation axis ˆα = α x α y α z ] T with ˆα T ˆα = and the rotation angle Θ, the quaternion (Euler Parameter) is defined by with the constraint: q q = := q4] ˆα sin Θ cos Θ, (5) To formulate the attitude tracking problem of a spacecraft, we need the error quaternion q e = q dq, where q denotes the current quaternion and q d denotes the desired quaternion. The kinematics equation is given by qe = G(q e )ω, G(q e ):= q4e I 3 + q e q T. (7) e e 3. LPV Model ased on the dynamics of Eq. (3), we develop an easy-to-use LPV model, in which we deal with 3-axis attitude control of a spacecraft equipped with RWs. The Jacobian linearization of Eq. (3) around the equilibrium point (ω eq =, Ω eq = ) leads to the LPV system of spacecraft dynamics. The spacecraft dynamics with RWs and the kinematic equation based on quaternions are given as follows: { ω = A(ρ)ω + u qe = G(, G( q e ) = (e I 3 + q e ), (8) q e )ω where the scheduling parameter vector is ρ = G s Ω R 3, and the control input vector is u = Ω together with A(ρ) = J (I ws G s Ω), (9) = I ws J G s. () Setting the state variable x := ω T q T e ] T, the state space representation of Eq. (8) is given as follows: ] ω A(ρ) = 3 3 qe G( + u () q e ) 3 3 ω qe 3 4 or simply described as where ẋ = A e (ρ, q e )x + e u () A e (ρ, q e ):= e : = A(ρ) 3 3 q e ) 3 3 ], (3) ]. (4) 3 4 Replacing G( q e ) by a convex hull with a scheduling parameter q e, Eq. () can be modeled as an LPV system. In this case, the total number of scheduling parameter is (3 + 3) and the total number of vertices of the convex hull is 64(= 6 ). Hence, it is difficult to design a GS controller due to excesses of the number of scheduling parameters. 4. Controller Synthesis for LPV Plant Fig.. RWs allocation. To avoid the difficulty from excess of the number of scheduling parameters, in this section, we shall introduce two methods, which are the PDCT method and the AQ method. Pd_6
3 T. SASAKI et al.: Spacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods 4.. Controller synthesis with PDCT We shall eliminate the scheduling parameter vector q e of Eq. () from the coefficient matrix to reduce the number of scheduling parameters. y using the Parameter-Dependent Coordinate Transformation (PDCT) 6) matrix: T := I G( q e ), (5) while introducing a virtual state ζ with ζ := G( q e ) q e, we obtain the following simple LPV model which is easy to use for control design. y using T, Eq. () can be expressed as follows: T A(ρ) 3 3 ] ω = T qe G( T q e ) T + T u 3 3 ω qe] 3 4 A(ρ) 3 3 ω I G( q e ) + u (6) q e 3 4 A(ρ) 3 3 ω = ω ζ I + u (7) ] ζ 3 4 x = à e (ρ) x + e u, (8) ] ω G( q e ) q = e where x := ω T ζ T ] T and A(ρ) 3 3 à e (ρ) := I, (9) e : =. () 3 4 Note that ζ G( q e ) q e (since G( q e ) is not constant) in the lower part of the state variable in Eq. (6) has been replaced by ζ in Eq. (7). This can be realized since this part is eliminated by the premultiplied matrix à e (ρ). (Note that two blocks of the right half of à e (ρ) are zero entries.) The GS controller designed to this simple LPV model guarantees overall stability and control performance for the original plant as in Eq. (8). This controller is given by u = K(ρ) x. () Figure shows the relationship of two plants in Eq. () and Eq. (8). After this operation, the number of vertices has been reduced into 8(= 3 ). Setting p = 8 as the number of the vertices, the LPV system can be expressed by the following polytopic representation: p p à e (ρ) = λ i (ρ)ã ei : λ i (ρ), λ i (ρ) =. () i= Then, the GS controller to the simple LPV model in Eq. (8) is constructed by p p K(ρ) = λ i (ρ) K i : λ i (ρ), λ i (ρ) =. (3) i= Figure 3 shows the diagram of polytopic system in Eqs. () and (3) (in case of p = 8). Now, we consider a GS controller K(ρ) that guarantees overall stability and achieves H performance for the simple LPV model as in Eq. (8). First, we introduce the generalized plant for Eq. (8) defined as follows: { x = à e (ρ) x + e u + Ew (4) z = C x + Du where the coefficient matrix set (C, D) is normally selected such that they normally satisfy the condition C T D =, D T D >, and where w and z are the disturbance input vector and the performance output vector for the simple LPV model in Eq. (8), respectively. Then, we consider the following LMI problem: i= i= ( inf )] Trace Z subject to W i, X, Z (Ãei X e W i ) + ( ) T <, (5) C X D W i I X E T >, for all i p. (6) Z Using the optimal solution sets X, W i to the problem in Eqs. (5) and (6), we have the extreme controllers: K i = W i X, i p. (7) Then, the GS controller to the simple LPV model in Eq. (8) is constructed by substituting Eq. (7) into Eq. (3). Note that the common Lyapunov solution X > was used in the past GS controller design and resulted in conservatism. As Fig.. Relationship of two plants. Fig. 3. Diagram of polytopic system. Pd_7
4 Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 4, No. ists3 (6) an alternative, we use another method, ) in which the distinct Lyapunov solutions X i > are adopted. Then, we have ( )] inf Trace Z i subject to W i, X i, Z i (Ãei X i e W i ) + ( ) T <, (8) C X i D W i I X i E T >, for each i p. (9) Z i Using the optimal solution sets ( X i, W i ), less conservative extreme controllers can be obtained. Using these extreme controllers K i = W i X i, i p, a GS controller is again constructed. In order to guarantee overall stability and control performance in a whole operation range, we seek a common Lyapunov solution X c > that satisfies the following LMIs ( inf )] Trace Z subject to W i, X c (Ãei e K i ) X c + ( ) T <, (3) (C D K i ) X c I X c E T >, for all i p. (3) Z for a set of previously designed extreme controllers K i, i p. Getting back the coordinate transformation x := T ( q e ) x, this GS controller can be transformed into the controller K(ρ, q e ) corresponding to the original plant in Eq. () as follows: where u = K(ρ) x = K(ρ)T( q e )T( q e ) x = K(ρ, q e )x (3) K(ρ, q e ):= K(ρ)T( q e ). (33) When the LMIs in Eqs. (3) and (3) are infeasible, we can check just the overall stability of the closed-loop system in a whole operation range, while replacing them by the following inequalities: X c >, (Ã ei e K i ) X c + X c (Ã ei e K i ) T <, (34) for all i p 4.. Controller synthesis with AQ we shall eliminate the scheduling parameter vector q e of Eq. () by using approximation of the final error quaternion value (AQ): 7) q e, e. (35) Then, kinematics Eq. (8) is approximated by G( q e ) = (e I 3 + q e ) I 3 3. (36) As a result, the state-space representation of Eq. () can be reduced into A(ρ) 3 3 q ω = e 3 3] ω q I + u e 3 3 (37) ẋ = Ã e (ρ)x + e u, (38) where A(ρ) 3 3 Ã e (ρ) := I, e := 3 3. (39) 3 3 The GS controller designed to this simple LPV model is given by u = K(ρ)x. (4) To design the GS controller, we use the same method as PDCT one in Subsection 4.., in which the distinct Lyapunov solutions X i > are adopted. Then, we have ( )] inf Trace Z i subject to W i, X i, Z i (Ãei X i e W i ) + ( ) T <, (4) C X i D W i I X i E T >, for each i p. (4) Z i Using the optimal solution sets ( X i, W i ), less conservative extreme controllers can be obtained. Using these extreme controllers K i = W i X i, i p, a GS controller is again constructed. We seek a common Lyapunov solution X c > that satisfies the following LMIs ( inf )] Trace Z subject to W i, X c (Ãei e K i ) X c + ( ) T <, (43) (C D K i ) X c I X c E T >, for all i p. (44) Z for a set of previously designed extreme controllers K i, i p. Therefore, we can get the GS controller K(ρ) constructed by polytopic system in Eq. (3). 5. Numerical Simulation We present numerical simulations with the PDCT method and the AQ method described before. The simulation parameters, the initial condition, and the desired quaternions are given in Table. The controller design parameters C, D and E are given by 5 I C = 3 3 I , D = 6 4, E = I 4 I The obtained controller gain of the extreme controllers K i, i 8 are presented as Appendix. Table. Simulation parameters. Symbol Value Unit J diag 8] kgm ] I ws. kgm ] ω.3..4] T rad/s] q ] T q d (Case ) ] T q d (Case ) ] T Pd_8
5 T. SASAKI et al.: Spacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods Angular velocityrad/s].. Angular velocityrad/s] Fig. 4. Angular velocity with PDCT (Case ) Fig. 8. Angular velocity with AQ (Case ). q q q q Fig. 5. with PDCT (Case ) Fig. 9. with AQ (Case ) Angular velocityrad/s].. Angular velocityrad/s] Fig. 6. Angular velocity with PDCT (Case ) Fig.. Angular velocity with AQ (Case ). q q q q Fig. 7. with PDCT (Case ) Fig.. with AQ (Case ). Pd_9
6 Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 4, No. ists3 (6) Complete attitude control of the spacecraft has been achieved by the GS controller with the PDCT method as shown in Figs And complete attitude control of the spacecraft has been achieved by the GS controller with the AQ method as shown in Figs. 8. In the small attitude maneuver (Case ) as shown in Figs. 4 5, 8 9, these controllers attain complete attitude control at almost the same control performance. On the other hand, in the large attitude maneuver (Case ) as shown in Figs. 6 7,, the control performance by the GS controller with the PDCT method has been improved, compared with the control performance by the GS controller with the AQ method. This is because the AQ method includes approximation in the modeling of the LPV plant. 6. Conclusion In this paper, we have established an LPV model for complete attitude control of a spacecraft with RWs. ased on this LPV model, we have developed an easy-to-use LPV model by using two proposed methods (PDCT and AQ). These two methods overcame the difficulty from excess of the number of scheduling parameters. Through a numerical example, we demonstrated the efficiency of the PDCT method to compare with the AQ method. As a result, the PDCT method has improved control performance in the case of large attitude maneuver. Acknowledgments This work was supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant Numbers 5J37 and (C)5K649. References ) Tsiotras, P.: Stabilization and Optimality Results for the Attitude Control Problem, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 9 (996), pp ) Yoon, H., Tsiotras, P.: Spacecraft Line-of-Sight Control Using a Single Variable-Speed Control Moment Gyro, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 9 (6), pp ) Schaub, H., Lappas, V., J.: Redundant Reaction Wheel Torque Distribution Yielding Instantaneous L Power-Optimal Attitude Control, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 3 (9), pp ) Kwon, S., Shimomura, T., Okubo, H.: Pointing control of spacecraft using two SGCMGs via LPV modeling theory, Acta Astronautica, 68 (), pp ) Yamamoto, Y., Shimomura, T.: Attitude Control of Spacecraft with VSCMGs using LPV Modeling Technique, Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference,, pp ) Yamamoto, Y., Shimomura, T. : Attitude Control of Spacecraft through A Simple LPV Model with A Virtual State Variable, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA. 7) Sasaki, T., Shimomura, T. : Generalized Dynamics of A Spacecraft with Plural MEDs and Attitude Control with DGVSCMGs via LPV Control Theory, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA 5. 8) Apkarian, P., Gahinet, P., ecker, G.: Self-Scheduled H Control of Linear Parameter-Varying Systems: A Design Example, Automatica, 3 (995), pp ) Chilali, M., Gahinet, P.: H Design with Pole Placement Constraints: An LMI Approach, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 4 (996), pp ) Shimomura, T., Kubotani, T.: Gain-Scheduled Control under Common Lyapunov Functions: Conservatism Revisited, Proceedings of 5 American Control Conference, 5, pp Appendix: Obtained extreme controllers We show the obtained gain of the extreme controllers K i, i 8 by using LMIs Eqs. (8) and (9) as follows: K = (45) K = (46) K 3 = (47) K 4 = (48) K 5 = (49) K 6 = (5) K 7 = (5) K 8 = (5) From these extreme controllers Eqs. (45) (5) and Eq. (3), we can obtain the GS controller K(ρ). Pd_
Mixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies
AAS03-558 Mixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies C. Eugene Skelton II and Christopher D. Hall Department of Aerospace & Ocean Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute
More informationOptimal Fault-Tolerant Configurations of Thrusters
Optimal Fault-Tolerant Configurations of Thrusters By Yasuhiro YOSHIMURA ) and Hirohisa KOJIMA, ) ) Aerospace Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hino, Japan (Received June st, 7) Fault tolerance
More informationVisual Feedback Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Micro Satellite using Two Wheels
Visual Feedback Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Micro Satellite using Two Wheels Fuyuto Terui a, Nobutada Sako b, Keisuke Yoshihara c, Toru Yamamoto c, Shinichi Nakasuka b a National Aerospace Laboratory
More informationRobust Control of a 3D Space Robot with an Initial Angular Momentum based on the Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Method
Vol. 9, No. 6, 8 Robust Control of a 3D Space Robot with an Initial Angular Momentum based on the Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Method Tatsuya Kai Department of Applied Electronics Faculty of Industrial
More informationAttitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis
AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, & Dynamics Revised Submission, December, 22 Attitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis Jonathan Lawton Raytheon Systems Inc. Tucson, Arizona 85734 Randal W. Beard
More informationTracking Rigid Body Motion Using Thrusters and Momentum. Wheels
JAS 199 Tracking Rigid Body Motion Using Thrusters and Momentum Wheels Christopher D. Hall, Panagiotis Tsiotras, and Haijun Shen Abstract Tracking control laws are developed for a rigid spacecraft using
More informationQuaternion-Based Tracking Control Law Design For Tracking Mode
A. M. Elbeltagy Egyptian Armed forces Conference on small satellites. 2016 Logan, Utah, USA Paper objectives Introduction Presentation Agenda Spacecraft combined nonlinear model Proposed RW nonlinear attitude
More informationWEIGHTING MATRICES DETERMINATION USING POLE PLACEMENT FOR TRACKING MANEUVERS
U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series D, Vol. 75, Iss. 2, 2013 ISSN 1454-2358 WEIGHTING MATRICES DETERMINATION USING POLE PLACEMENT FOR TRACKING MANEUVERS Raluca M. STEFANESCU 1, Claudiu L. PRIOROC 2, Adrian M. STOICA
More informationStabilization of Angular Velocity of Asymmetrical Rigid Body. Using Two Constant Torques
Stabilization of Angular Velocity of Asymmetrical Rigid Body Using Two Constant Torques Hirohisa Kojima Associate Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Tokyo Metropolitan University 6-6, Asahigaoka,
More informationGlobal Trajectory Design for Position and Attitude Control of an Underactuated Satellite *
Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci. Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 7 4, 26 Global Trajectory Design for Position and Attitude Control of an Underactuated Satellite * Yasuhiro YOSHIMURA, ) Takashi MATSUNO, 2) and Shinji
More information*School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
NEW CONTROL LAWS FOR THE ATTITUDE STABILIZATION OF RIGID BODIES PANAGIOTIS TSIOTRAS *School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 7907. Abstract. This paper introduces
More informationLinear Feedback Control Using Quasi Velocities
Linear Feedback Control Using Quasi Velocities Andrew J Sinclair Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849 John E Hurtado and John L Junkins Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 A novel approach
More informationSATELLITE ATTITUDE TRACKING BY QUATERNION-BASED BACKSTEPPING. Raymond Kristiansen,1 Per Johan Nicklasson,2 Jan Tommy Gravdahl,3
SATELLITE ATTITUDE TRACKING BY QUATERNION-BASED BACKSTEPPING Raymond Kristiansen,1 Per Johan Nicklasson,2 Jan Tommy Gravdahl,3 Department of Space Technology Narvik University College, Norway Department
More informationResearch Article An Equivalent LMI Representation of Bounded Real Lemma for Continuous-Time Systems
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 28, Article ID 67295, 8 pages doi:1.1155/28/67295 Research Article An Equivalent LMI Representation of Bounded Real Lemma
More informationIAC-11-C1.5.9 INERTIA-FREE ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WITH UNKNOWN TIME-VARYING MASS DISTRIBUTION
6nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, SA. Copyright by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved IAC--C.5.9 INERTIA-FREE ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WITH UNKNOWN
More informationAttitude Tracking Control of a Small Satellite in Low Earth Orbit
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 10-13 August 2009, Chicago, Illinois AIAA 2009-5902 Attitude Tracking Control of a Small Satellite in Low Earth Orbit Amit K. Sanyal Zachary Lee-Ho In
More informationAn Exact Stability Analysis Test for Single-Parameter. Polynomially-Dependent Linear Systems
An Exact Stability Analysis Test for Single-Parameter Polynomially-Dependent Linear Systems P. Tsiotras and P.-A. Bliman Abstract We provide a new condition for testing the stability of a single-parameter,
More information3D Pendulum Experimental Setup for Earth-based Testing of the Attitude Dynamics of an Orbiting Spacecraft
3D Pendulum Experimental Setup for Earth-based Testing of the Attitude Dynamics of an Orbiting Spacecraft Mario A. Santillo, Nalin A. Chaturvedi, N. Harris McClamroch, Dennis S. Bernstein Department of
More informationIAA-CU A Simulator for Robust Attitude Control of Cubesat Deploying Satellites
A Simulator for Robust Attitude Control of Cubesat Deploying Satellites Giovanni Mattei, George Georgiou, Angelo Pignatelli, Salvatore Monaco Abstract The paper deals with the development and testing of
More informationMultiobjective Optimization Applied to Robust H 2 /H State-feedback Control Synthesis
Multiobjective Optimization Applied to Robust H 2 /H State-feedback Control Synthesis Eduardo N. Gonçalves, Reinaldo M. Palhares, and Ricardo H. C. Takahashi Abstract This paper presents an algorithm for
More informationAdaptive Spacecraft Attitude Tracking Control with Actuator Uncertainties
Adaptive Spacecraft Attitude Tracking Control with Actuator Uncertainties Hyungjoo Yoon and Panagiotis Tsiotras Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 3332-15, USA An adaptive control algorithm
More informationParameterized Linear Matrix Inequality Techniques in Fuzzy Control System Design
324 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2001 Parameterized Linear Matrix Inequality Techniques in Fuzzy Control System Design H. D. Tuan, P. Apkarian, T. Narikiyo, and Y. Yamamoto
More informationSATELLITE ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN WITH NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND KINEMTICS OF QUATERNION USING REACTION WHEELS
SATELLITE ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN WITH NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND KINEMTICS OF QUATERNION USING REACTION WHEELS Breno Braga Galvao Maria Cristina Mendes Faustino Luiz Carlos Gadelha de Souza breno.braga.galvao@gmail.com
More informationMixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies
Mixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies C. Eugene Skelton II Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment
More informationDesign of Sliding Mode Attitude Control for Communication Spacecraft
Design of Sliding Mode Attitude Control for Communication Spacecraft Erkan Abdulhamitbilal 1 and Elbrous M. Jafarov 1 ISTAVIA Engineering, Istanbul Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering, Istanbul Technical
More informationSatellite Attitude Control by Quaternion-Based Backstepping
25 American Control Conference June 8-1, 25. Portland, OR, USA WeB11.4 Satellite Attitude Control by Quaternion-Based Backstepping Raymond Kristiansen* and Per J. Nicklasson** Department of Computer Science,
More informationMAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009
MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009 Please read through the entire homework set before beginning. Also, please label clearly your answers and summarize your findings as concisely as possible.
More informationCOUPLED ORBITAL AND ATTITUDE CONTROL SIMULATION
COUPLED ORBITAL AND ATTITUDE CONTROL SIMULATION Scott E. Lennox AOE 5984: Advanced Attitude Spacecraft Dynamics and Control December 12, 23 INTRODUCTION In the last few years the space industry has started
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Control Using Control Moment Gyro Reconfiguration
Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Control Moment Gyro Reconfiguration Kanthalakshmi SRINIVASAN 1, Deepana GANDHI 1, Manikandan VENUGOPAL 2 1 Department of Instrumentation and Control Systems Engineering,
More informationResearch Article Shorter Path Design and Control for an Underactuated Satellite
Hindawi International Journal of Aerospace Engineering Volume 27 Article ID 8536732 9 pages https://doi.org/.55/27/8536732 Research Article Shorter Path Design and Control for an Underactuated Satellite
More informationCommand shaping for a flexible satellite platform controlled by advanced fly-wheels systems. 1 Introduction
56th International Astronautical Congress, Paper IAC-5-C.1.3 Command shaping for a flexible satellite platform controlled by advanced fly-wheels systems Dario Izzo and Lorenzo Pettazzi ESA, Advanced Concepts
More information3 Rigid Spacecraft Attitude Control
1 3 Rigid Spacecraft Attitude Control Consider a rigid spacecraft with body-fixed frame F b with origin O at the mass centre. Let ω denote the angular velocity of F b with respect to an inertial frame
More informationAttitude Control of a Bias Momentum Satellite Using Moment of Inertia
I. INTRODUCTION Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Satellite Using Moment of Inertia HYOCHOONG BANG Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology HYUNG DON CHOI Korea Aerospace Research Institute
More informationProblem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%)
Problem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%) Consider the kinematic equations: Figure 1: NTNU s research vessel, R/V Gunnerus, and Nomoto model: T ṙ + r = Kδ (1) with T = 22.0 s and K = 0.1 s 1.
More informationSpacecraft Attitude and Power Control Using Variable Speed Control Moment Gyros. Hyungjoo Yoon
Spacecraft Attitude and Power Control Using Variable Speed Control Moment Gyros A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Hyungjoo Yoon In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor
More informationAS3010: Introduction to Space Technology
AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology L E C T U R E 22 Part B, Lecture 22 19 April, 2017 C O N T E N T S Attitude stabilization passive and active. Actuators for three axis or active stabilization.
More informationAn Inverse Dynamics Attitude Control System with Autonomous Calibration. Sanny Omar Dr. David Beale Dr. JM Wersinger
An Inverse Dynamics Attitude Control System with Autonomous Calibration Sanny Omar Dr. David Beale Dr. JM Wersinger Outline Attitude Determination and Control Systems (ADACS) Overview Coordinate Frames
More informationUnit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft without velocity measurement
Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel San Diego, CA, USA, December 3-5, 6 Unit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Control using CMGs: Singularities and Global Controllability
1 / 28 Spacecraft Attitude Control using CMGs: Singularities and Global Controllability Sanjay Bhat TCS Innovation Labs Hyderabad International Workshop on Perspectives in Dynamical Systems and Control
More informationTTK4190 Guidance and Control Exam Suggested Solution Spring 2011
TTK4190 Guidance and Control Exam Suggested Solution Spring 011 Problem 1 A) The weight and buoyancy of the vehicle can be found as follows: W = mg = 15 9.81 = 16.3 N (1) B = 106 4 ( ) 0.6 3 3 π 9.81 =
More informationQUATERNION FEEDBACK ATTITUDE CONTROL DESIGN: A NONLINEAR H APPROACH
Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 406-4, September 003 406 Brief Paper QUAERNION FEEDBACK AIUDE CONROL DESIGN: A NONLINEAR H APPROACH Long-Life Show, Jyh-Ching Juang, Ying-Wen Jan, and Chen-zung
More informationKINEMATIC EQUATIONS OF NONNOMINAL EULER AXIS/ANGLE ROTATION
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS -14-10-01 KINEMATIC EQUATIONS OF NONNOMINAL EULER AXIS/ANGLE ROTATION Emanuele L. de Angelis and Fabrizio Giulietti INTRODUCTION Euler axis/angle is a useful representation in many attitude
More informationSliding Mode Control Strategies for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers
Osaka University March 15, 2018 Sliding Mode Control Strategies for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers Elisabetta Punta CNR-IEIIT, Italy Problem Statement First Case Spacecraft Model Position Dynamics Attitude
More informationAnalytical Mechanics. of Space Systems. tfa AA. Hanspeter Schaub. College Station, Texas. University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado.
Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems Third Edition Hanspeter Schaub University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado John L. Junkins Texas A&M University College Station, Texas AIM EDUCATION SERIES Joseph A.
More informationRobust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft
Robust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft AER1503 Spacecraft Dynamics and Controls II April 24, 2015 Christopher Au Agenda Introduction Model Formulation Controller Designs Simulation Results 2
More informationSatellite Attitude Control System Design Using Reaction Wheels Bhanu Gouda Brian Fast Dan Simon
Satellite Attitude Control System Design Using Reaction Wheels Bhanu Gouda Brian Fast Dan Simon Outline 1. Overview of Attitude Determination and Control system. Problem formulation 3. Control schemes
More informationSpacecraft Rate Damping with Predictive Control Using Magnetic Actuators Only
C. Böhm a M. Merk a W. Fichter b F. Allgöwer a Spacecraft Rate Damping with Predictive Control Using Magnetic Actuators Only Stuttgart, March 2009 a Institute of Systems Theory and Automatic Control, University
More informationHysteresis Nutation Damper for Spin Satellite
Hysteresis Nutation Damper for Spin Satellite Hamed Shahmohamadi Ousaloo * Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.net The Open Aerospace Engineering Journal, 2013, 6, 1-5 1 Open Access Space
More informationAlmost Global Robust Attitude Tracking Control of Spacecraft in Gravity
Almost Global Robust Attitude Tracking Control of Spacecraft in Gravity Amit K. Sanyal Nalin A. Chaturvedi In this paper, we treat the practical problem of tracking the attitude and angular velocity of
More informationLPV MODELING AND CONTROL OF A 2-DOF ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR BASED ON DESCRIPTOR REPRESENTATION
Copyright c 9 by ABCM January 4-8, 1, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brazil LPV MODELING AND CONTROL OF A -DOF ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR BASED ON DESCRIPTOR REPRESENTATION Houssem Halalchi, houssem.halalchi@unistra.fr Edouard
More informationAdaptive Unscented Kalman Filter with Multiple Fading Factors for Pico Satellite Attitude Estimation
Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter with Multiple Fading Factors for Pico Satellite Attitude Estimation Halil Ersin Söken and Chingiz Hajiyev Aeronautics and Astronautics Faculty Istanbul Technical University
More informationROBUST THREE-AXIS ATTITUDE STABILIZATION FOR INERTIAL POINTING SPACECRAFT USING MAGNETORQUERS *
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS2-4-4-7 AAS 4-52 ROBUST THREE-AXIS ATTITUDE STABILIZATION FOR INERTIAL POINTING SPACECRAFT USING MAGNETORQUERS * INTRODUCTION Fabio Celani In this work feedback control laws are designed
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Dynamics for Undergraduates
Session 1123 Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics for Undergraduates Dr. Rachel Shinn Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ Abstract Teaching spacecraft attitude dynamics to undergraduate students
More informationIAC-04-A.P.12 NONLINEAR ATTITUDE CONTROL OF THE MICRO-SATELLITE ESEO
IAC-04-A.P.12 NONLINEAR ATTITUDE CONTROL OF THE MICRO-SATELLITE ESEO Morten Pedersen Topland and Jan Tommy Gravdahl Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationOn Design of Reduced-Order H Filters for Discrete-Time Systems from Incomplete Measurements
Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec. 9-11, 2008 On Design of Reduced-Order H Filters for Discrete-Time Systems from Incomplete Measurements Shaosheng Zhou
More informationNomenclature. = the local vertical and local horizontal reference frame. = angular velocity vector of spacecraft (rad/s)
Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control of Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics with Actuator Failures Yu Han 1 Harbin Institude of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 151 James D. Biggs 2 University of Strathclyde,
More informationA Miniaturized Satellite Attitude Determination and Control System with Autonomous Calibration Capabilities
A Miniaturized Satellite Attitude Determination and Control System with Autonomous Calibration Capabilities Sanny Omar Dr. David Beale Dr. JM Wersinger Introduction ADACS designed for CubeSats CubeSats
More information(3.1) a 2nd-order vector differential equation, as the two 1st-order vector differential equations (3.3)
Chapter 3 Kinematics As noted in the Introduction, the study of dynamics can be decomposed into the study of kinematics and kinetics. For the translational motion of a particle of mass m, this decomposition
More informationRobust Anti-Windup Compensation for PID Controllers
Robust Anti-Windup Compensation for PID Controllers ADDISON RIOS-BOLIVAR Universidad de Los Andes Av. Tulio Febres, Mérida 511 VENEZUELA FRANCKLIN RIVAS-ECHEVERRIA Universidad de Los Andes Av. Tulio Febres,
More informationFAULT DETECTION for SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM. M. Amin Vahid D. Mechanical Engineering Department Concordia University December 19 th, 2010
FAULT DETECTION for SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM M. Amin Vahid D. Mechanical Engineering Department Concordia University December 19 th, 2010 Attitude control : the exercise of control over the orientation
More informationPhysics 312, Winter 2007, Practice Final
Physics 312, Winter 2007, Practice Final Time: Two hours Answer one of Question 1 or Question 2 plus one of Question 3 or Question 4 plus one of Question 5 or Question 6. Each question carries equal weight.
More informationVibration Suppression Control of a Space Robot with Flexible Appendage based on Simple Dynamic Model*
213 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) November 3-7, 213 Tokyo, Japan Vibration Suppression Control of a Space Robot with Flexible Appendage based on Simple Dynamic
More informationAdaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy
Adaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy Maodeng Li, Wuxing Jing Department of Aerospace Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150001, China
More informationCoordinated Attitude Control of Spacecraft Formation without Angular Velocity Feedback: A Decentralized Approach
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference - 3 August 29, Chicago, Illinois AIAA 29-6289 Coordinated Attitude Control of Spacecraft Formation without Angular Velocity Feedback: A Decentralized Approach
More informationAdaptive Control of Space Station
~~ NASA Adaptive Control of Space Station with Control Moment Gyros Robert H. Bishop, Scott J. Paynter and John W. Sunkel An adaptive control approach is investigated for the Space Station. The main components
More informationImmersion and Invariance Observers for Gyro-Free Attitude Control Systems
Immersion and Invariance Observers for Gyro-Free Attitude Control Systems Sungpil Yang, Maruthi Akella, Frédéric Mazenc To cite this version: Sungpil Yang, Maruthi Akella, Frédéric Mazenc. Immersion and
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationComputer Problem 1: SIE Guidance, Navigation, and Control
Computer Problem 1: SIE 39 - Guidance, Navigation, and Control Roger Skjetne March 12, 23 1 Problem 1 (DSRV) We have the model: m Zẇ Z q ẇ Mẇ I y M q q + ẋ U cos θ + w sin θ ż U sin θ + w cos θ θ q Zw
More informationEnergy Optimum Reactionless Path Planning for Capture of Tumbling Orbiting Objects using a Dual-Arm Robot
Energy Optimum Reactionless Path Planning for Capture of Tumbling Orbiting Objects using a Dual-Arm Robot S. V. Shah and A. Gattupalli Robotics Research Center International Institute of Information Technology
More informationMission Analysis of Sample Return from Jovian Trojan Asteroid by Solar Power Sail
Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 12, No. ists29, pp. Pk_43-Pk_50, 2014 Original Paper Mission Analysis of Sample Return from Jovian Trojan Asteroid by Solar Power Sail By Jun MATSUMOTO 1), Ryu FUNASE
More informationMulti-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Multi-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures Eric Peterson Harry G.
More informationReal-time Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Mobile Robot with Unknown Dynamics
Real-time Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Mobile Robot with Unknown Dynamics TIEMIN HU and SIMON X. YANG ARIS (Advanced Robotics & Intelligent Systems) Lab School of Engineering, University of Guelph
More information9 th AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Breckenridge, CO February 7 10, 1999
AAS 99-139 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics MATLAB TOOLBOX FOR RIGID BODY KINEMATICS Hanspeter Schaub and John L. Junkins 9 th AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Breckenridge,
More informationRobot Dynamics - Rotary Wing UAS: Control of a Quadrotor
Robot Dynamics Rotary Wing AS: Control of a Quadrotor 5-85- V Marco Hutter, Roland Siegwart and Thomas Stastny Robot Dynamics - Rotary Wing AS: Control of a Quadrotor 7..6 Contents Rotary Wing AS. Introduction
More informationAttitude control of a hopping robot: a feasibility study
Attitude control of a hopping robot: a feasibility study Tammepõld, R. and Kruusmaa, M. Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia Fiorini, P. University of Verona, Italy Summary Motivation Small mobile
More informationOPTIMAL SPACECRAF1 ROTATIONAL MANEUVERS
STUDIES IN ASTRONAUTICS 3 OPTIMAL SPACECRAF1 ROTATIONAL MANEUVERS JOHNL.JUNKINS Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A. and JAMES D.TURNER Cambridge Research, Division of PRA, Inc., Cambridge,
More informationGain Scheduling Control with Multi-loop PID for 2-DOF Arm Robot Trajectory Control
Gain Scheduling Control with Multi-loop PID for 2-DOF Arm Robot Trajectory Control Khaled M. Helal, 2 Mostafa R.A. Atia, 3 Mohamed I. Abu El-Sebah, 2 Mechanical Engineering Department ARAB ACADEMY FOR
More informationand Mixed / Control of Dual-Actuator Hard Disk Drive via LMIs
and Mixed / Control of Dual-Actuator Hard Disk Drive via LMIs Nasser Mohamad Zadeh Electrical Engineering Department Tarbiat Modares University Tehran, Iran mohamadzadeh@ieee.org Ramin Amirifar Electrical
More informationConsiderations choosing the Optimal Equilibrium Point on the Rotational Sphere
2 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July 2, 2 FrB2.2 Considerations choosing the Optimal Equilibrium Point on the Rotational Sphere Rune Schlanbusch, Raymond Kristiansen
More informationLecture Module 5: Introduction to Attitude Stabilization and Control
1 Lecture Module 5: Introduction to Attitude Stabilization and Control Lectures 1-3 Stability is referred to as a system s behaviour to external/internal disturbances (small) in/from equilibrium states.
More informationOptimal Finite-precision Implementations of Linear Parameter Varying Controllers
IFAC World Congress 2008 p. 1/20 Optimal Finite-precision Implementations of Linear Parameter Varying Controllers James F Whidborne Department of Aerospace Sciences, Cranfield University, UK Philippe Chevrel
More informationOn Bounded Real Matrix Inequality Dilation
On Bounded Real Matrix Inequality Dilation Solmaz Sajjadi-Kia and Faryar Jabbari Abstract We discuss a variation of dilated matrix inequalities for the conventional Bounded Real matrix inequality, and
More informationAttitude Determination for NPS Three-Axis Spacecraft Simulator
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit 6-9 August 4, Providence, Rhode Island AIAA 4-5386 Attitude Determination for NPS Three-Axis Spacecraft Simulator Jong-Woo Kim, Roberto Cristi and
More informationPRELIMINARY HARDWARE DESIGN OF ATTITUDE CONTROL SUBSYSTEM OF LEONIDAS SPACECRAFT
PRELIMINARY HARDWARE DESIGN OF ATTITUDE CONTROL SUBSYSTEM OF LEONIDAS SPACECRAFT Chak Shing Jackie Chan College of Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI 96822 ABSTRACT In order to monitor
More informationStabilization of a Specified Equilibrium in the Inverted Equilibrium Manifold of the 3D Pendulum
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 ThA11.6 Stabilization of a Specified Equilibrium in the Inverted Equilibrium
More informationREACTION WHEEL CONFIGURATIONS FOR HIGH AND MIDDLE INCLINATION ORBITS
REACTION WHEEL CONFIGURATIONS FOR HIGH AND MIDDLE INCLINATION ORBITS Zuliana Ismail and Renuganth Varatharajoo Department of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia E-Mail: zuliana.ismail@gmail.com
More informationObserver-Based Control of Discrete-Time LPV Systems with Uncertain Parameters
1 Observer-Based Control of Discrete-Time LPV Systems with Uncertain Parameters WPMH Heemels, J Daafouz, G Millerioux Abstract In this paper LMI-based design conditions are presented for observer-based
More informationExtension of Farrenkopf Steady-State Solutions with Estimated Angular Rate
Extension of Farrenopf Steady-State Solutions with Estimated Angular Rate Andrew D. Dianetti and John L. Crassidis University at Buffalo, State University of New Yor, Amherst, NY 46-44 Steady-state solutions
More informationRange Measurement based Localization between Mothership and Lander Considering Asteroid Shape Using Particle Filter
Range Measurement based Localization between Mothership and Lander Considering Asteroid Shape Using Particle Filter By Hirokazu ISHIDA, 1) Yuichi TSUDA, 2) 1) Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
More informationONE of the challenges in the design of attitude control
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 1 Adaptive Sliding Mode Fault Tolerant Attitude Tracking Control for Flexible Spacecraft Under Actuator Saturation Bing Xiao, Qinglei Hu, Member, IEEE, YouminZhang,
More informationA GLOBAL SLIDING MODE CONTROL WITH PRE-DETERMINED CONVERGENCE TIME DESIGN FOR REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES IN REENTRY PHASE
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS-4 -- A GLOBAL SLIDING MODE CONTROL WITH PRE-DETERMINED CONVERGENCE TIME DESIGN FOR REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES IN REENTRY PHASE L. Wang, Y. Z. Sheng, X. D. Liu, and P. L. Lu INTRODUCTION This
More informationATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS2-14-07-02 ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS Ozan Tekinalp, * Omer Atas INTRODUCTION Utilization of solar sails for the de-orbiting of satellites is
More informationSteering laws analysis of SGCMGs based on singular value decomposition theory
Appl. Math. Mech. -Engl. Ed., 2008, 29(8):1013 1021 DOI 10.1007/s10483-008-0805-2 c Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag 2008 Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition) Steering laws analysis
More informationStabilization of a Pan-Tilt System Using a Polytopic Quasi-LPV Model and LQR Control
Stabilization of a Pan-Tilt System Using a Polytopic Quasi-LPV Model and LQR Control Sanem Evren and Mustafa Unel Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences Sabanci University, Tuzla, Istanbul 34956,
More informationSatellite attitude control system simulator
Shock and Vibration 5 (28) 395 42 395 IOS Press Satellite attitude control system simulator G.T. Conti and L.C.G. Souza National Institute for Space Research, INPE, Av. dos Astronautas 758, 2227-, S ão
More information. D CR Nomenclature D 1
. D CR Nomenclature D 1 Appendix D: CR NOMENCLATURE D 2 The notation used by different investigators working in CR formulations has not coalesced, since the topic is in flux. This Appendix identifies the
More informationJitter and Basic Requirements of the Reaction Wheel Assembly in the Attitude Control System
Jitter and Basic Requirements of the Reaction Wheel Assembly in the Attitude Control System Lulu Liu August, 7 1 Brief Introduction Photometric precision is a major concern in this space mission. A pointing
More informationRobust Fault Tolerant Control Framework using Uncertain. Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Models
Robust Fault Tolerant Control Framework using Uncertain Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Models Damiano Rotondo, Fatiha Nejjari and Vicenç Puig Abstract This chapter is concerned with the introduction of a fault tolerant
More informationEscape Trajectories from Sun Earth Distant Retrograde Orbits
Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 4, No. ists30, pp. Pd_67-Pd_75, 06 Escape Trajectories from Sun Earth Distant Retrograde Orbits By Yusue OKI ) and Junichiro KAWAGUCHI ) ) Department of Aeronautics
More information