arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 1 Sep 2009

Transcription

1 Septembe 2, 29 Quantum vacuum effects as f(r) gavity. Application to stas. axiv:99.12v1 [g-qc] 1 Sep 29 Emilio Santos Depatamento de Física. Univesidad de Cantabia. Santande. Spain. Abstact It is assumed that, fo weak spacetime cuvatue, the main gavitational effect of the quantum vacuum stess-enegy coesponds to adding a tem ar 2 to the Einstein- Hilbet action. It is shown that compatibility with Sola Systems obsevaction implies a, 6a<5 km. The influence of the tem in the equilibium and stability of white dwafs is studied. Popeties of the inteio of the Sun povide the bound 6a<78 km. PACS numbes: 4.5.+h ; 4.25.Nx 1

2 I. Intoduction In the study of quantum fields in cuved spacetime it has been stablished that the quantum vacuum gives ise to a finite, non-zeo, enegy, 1. 2 Futhemoe, many effects have been attibuted to the gavity of the quantum vacuum, like the ecently obseved acceleation in the expansion of the univese. 3 Howeve the pecise value of the stess-enegy associated to the vacuum o its dependence with the cuvatue is not known. Hee I shall use a phenomenological, athe than fundamental, appoach assuming that the gavitational effect of the quantum vacuum, in the semiclassical appoximation, is equivalent to using a f(r) tem, athe than the usual Einstein- Hilbet action, R being the cuvatue scala. Intoducing the quantum vacuum effects in this fom guaantees that the vacuum contibution fulfils the standad consevation laws, that is the stess-enegy tenso is divegence fee. Specifically I will assume that the action may be witten S = 1 d 4 x gf(r) + S, (1) 2k whee S is the matte action, k = 8πG, G being Newton constant, and I shall use units c = 1 thoughout. Actually f(r) gavity has been an active field of eseach in the last few yeas (fo a eview see Sotiiou and Faaoni. 4 ) Howeve most of the aticles devoted to the subject ae elated to cosmology, which is not ou aim hee. Without excluding the possibility that the expansion of the univese deives fom the quantum vacuum, ou pupose will be to exploe the possible influence of the vacuum enegy in the stuctue of stas. I shall study cases whee the space-time cuvatue is weak and thus assume that the function f(r) may be appoximated by a polynomial of second degee, that is f(r) = R 2Λ + br + ar 2. (2) The fist tem of the ight hand side is the standad geneal elativistic tem. The next tem coesponds to a possible cosmological constant, which I shall ignoe in the following because its effects would be negligible in the study of stas. I assume that the latte two tems (and possibly the cosmological one) deive fom the quantum vacuum. In most of the pape I shall assume that a > because the choice a < gives ise to seious difficulties. 4 The field equations coesponding to eq.(2) ae 4 (1 + b + 2aR)R µν 1 2 (R + br + ar2 )g µν 2a [ µ ν g µν ] R = kt mat µν, (3) Retaining only the geneal elativistic tem in the left hand side, I may ewite this equation in the fom G µν R µν 1 2 g µνr = kt µν, T µν T matt µν + T vac µν, (4) 2

3 whee Tµν mat is the stess-enegy tenso of the matte and Tµν vac that of the quantum vacuum. That is, I assume that the latte is given by T vac µν = b k ( R µν 1 2 g µνr ) + a k { 2RR µν g µνr [ µ ν g µν ] R }. (5) We may wite the vacuum contibution popotional to b on the left hand side of eq.(4), which leads to G µν = k Tµν mat + k Tµν vac, (6) whee { Tµν vac a 2RR k µν + 1 } 2 g µνr [ µ ν g µν ] R, (7) a a 1 + b, k k 1 + b. (8) Passing fom eq.(4) to eq.(6) is fomally equivalent to putting b = in eq.(5) and edefining appopiately the gavitational constant k, the paamete a and the vacuum stess-enegy tenso, Tµν vac. Following Zel dovich 5 we might name tue vacuum polaization the vacuum stess-enegy tenso esulting afte enomalizing the gavitational constant as in the passage fom k to k. But I stess that this does not mean that the vacuum contibution coesponding to the tem br in eq.(2) is small. In the following I shall call vacuum stess-enegy tenso the one given by eq.(6) and emove the sta symbols, that is I shall wite a, k and Tµν vac fo a, k and Tµν vac, espectively. I will use eqs.(6) and (7) as stating point fo the est of the pape, but witten in tems of Einstein s tenso G µν athe than Ricci s tenso R µν. The elation between G µν and R µν is given in the fist eq.(4), whence the elation between the espective taces follows, that is G = R. Hence eqs.(6) and (7) may be ewitten G µν = 2aG ( G µν 1 ) 4 g µνg Taking the tace of this equation we get 2a ( µ ν G g µν G) + kt mat µν. (9) G 6a G = kt mat k(t mat ) µ µ = k ( ρ mat 3p mat), (1) whee I have assumed local isotopy fo matte, that is equality of adial and tansvese pessues. We may eliminate G amongst eqs.(9) and (1) which gives ( G µν = 2aG G µν 1 ) 4 g µνg 2a µ ν G g µνg 1 3 g µνkt mat + ktµν mat. (11) It is easy to check that taking the tace of eq.(11) gives again eq.(1). 3

4 Ou task will be to solve eqs.(11) (o eqs.(9)) fo a sta, that is a body with spheical symmety in a static spacetime, with the condition that the metic is asymptotically flat (Minkowskian). I will use standad (cuvatue) coodinates with metic ds 2 = exp (β ()) dt 2 + exp (α ()) dω 2. (12) In a static poblem of spheical symmety thee ae only 3 independent components of Einstein s tenso, namely G t t, G, Gθ θ = Gφ φ, which ae well known functions of the metic paametes α and β 6. Thus we have 4 independent equations, namely the 3 eqs.(11) plus a elation between density and pessue. In paticula fo a sta in equilibium the latte elation is the equation of state of matte, i, e, p mat = p mat (ρ mat ). We have also 4 unknown functions, namely α (),β (),ρ mat () and p mat (). The solution of these equations is involved in geneal, although some exact solutions have been found. 7 Hee I shall conside poblems whee some appoximations ae valid which amatically simplify the calculations. II. Constaints due to Sola System obsevations The solution of the field equations outside a spheical sta, with a geneal f(r), has been studied ecently by seveal authos. 8 The inteest of the poblem is that it puts constaints on the functions f(r) in ode to be compatible with known facts in the Sola System. Hee I shall make a calculation fo the paticula case of the function eq.(2), with the pupose of finding the ange of values of a compatible with Sola System obsevations. In ode to solve eq.(1) we may appoximate the opeato by the flat-space Laplacian opeato 2, which is valid fo a static field when the cuvatue of space is small. I shall stat with the case a >. Thus eq.(1) may be solved with Geen s function method and the esult is, outside the sta G = k 24πa exp ( ) 4π ( 2 ρ mat 3p mat) 6a An appoximation has been made due to the fact that M = R 4π 2 ( ρ mat + ρ vac) R km ( 24πa exp 4π 2 ( ρ mat 3p mat). ) fo > R. 6a In a Newtonian sta we may assume that both p mat and ρ vac ae small enough inside the sta fo the appoximation being valid. It is obvious fom eq.(13) that, if thee was no vacuum contibution, that is a, we would get G = outside the sta as it should. Now we shall solve the equations fo the components G t t, G, Gθ θ = Gφ φ of Einstein s tenso, eq.(11), which gives (1 2aG)G µν = kt mat µν 1 3 kg µνt mat g µνg 4 (13)

5 ( 2a Γ 1 dg µν d 2 G δ1 µ δ1 ν 1 ) 2 4 g µνg 2, (14) whee δ 1 µδ 1 ν means that the last tem is pesent only fo the component G of Einstein s tenso (in ode to avoid confusion with the adial coodinate I shall substitute 1 fo as an index in the following.) Fom eq.(13) we see that 2aG is ode km/r << 1. It may be ealized that also the tems involving G 2 ae ode km/r with espect to g µν G. Theefoe all these tems may be neglected and eq.(14) becomes G µν = ktµν mat 1 3 kg µνt mat g µνg + 2aΓ 1 dg µν d 2 G 2aδ1 µ δ1 ν. (15) 2 The affine connections Γ 1 tt and Γ 1 11 ae ode km/r, whence the tems involving them may be neglected. To the same ode we may appoximate g θθ Γ 1 θθ = gφφ Γ 1 φφ 1/, g11 1. (16) Afte that eqs.(15) lead to simple expessions outside the sta, whee T mat =, namely kρ vac G t t = 1 3 G = km ( 72πa exp ), (17) 6a ( kp vac 1 + ) ( exp ), (18) 6a 6a kp vac θ G = 1 3 G G 2ad2 = km 2 6π 3 G θ θ = 1 3 G 2a dg = km ( 2 12π 3 6a + ) ( + 1 exp 6a It is easy to check that the vacuum density and pessue fulfil the equality ρ vac p vac 2p vac θ = 1 k ( ) G t t + G + Gθ θ + Gφ φ = 1 k G, ). (19) 6a with G given by eq.(13). Now we must find the metic functions α () and β (). They may be obtained fom the well known elations 6 e α = 1 1 Inside the sta we get fom eqs.(1) and (15) 2 G t t, dβ = eα 1 e α G 1 1. (2) G t t kρ mat + 6a 2 G, whence, taking eq.(13) into account, we obtain R 2 G t km t 4π km ( 1 + R ) ( exp R ) 12π 6a 6a 5

6 Outside the sta we shall use eq.(17) fo G t t, thus obtaining exp( α) 1 km 4π + km ( 1 + ) ( exp ). (21) 12π 6a 6a In the second eq.(2) we may appoximate exp(α) by 1 + α in the fist tem and by 1 in the second one. Thus, taking eq.(21) into account, we obtain outside the sta dβ km 4π + km ( 1 + ) ( exp ). 2 12π 2 6a 6a This should be integated with the condition β () fo, which coesponds to identifying the coodinate t with the pope time of an obseve at infinity. This gives β km 4π km ( 12π exp ). (22) 6a It may be checked that eqs.(21) and (22) ae compatible with eq.(19) povided that we neglect tems involving (dβ/) 2 and (dα/)(dβ/) in the expession giving G θ θ in tems of α and β. In ode to know whethe these esults ae compatible with Sola System obsevations we may calculate the PPM paamete γ = α/β with α and β given by eqs.(21) and (22), espectively. We get γ = 3 (1 + x) exp( x), X R, x 3 + exp( x) 6a 6a. (23) This shows that when x >> 1 we have γ = 1 with an exponentially small eo, but when x << 1, theefoe X << 1, γ.5. The fome (latte) case coesponds to 6a much smalle (lage) than the typical size of the Sola System. The esult fo lage a is in ageement with pevious calculations. 8 Sola System obsevations lead to γ = 1 + (2.1 ± 2.3) It may be ealized that x = X 13 is compatible with this value of γ and fo any x > X 13 the paamete γ is even close to unity. We conclude that the theoy esting upon eqs.(4) and (5) is compatible with Sola System obsevations wheneve the paamete a fulfils a, 6a 1 13 R 5 km. (24) Fo the sake of completeness let us conside now the case a <. In this case we get outside the sta, instead of eq.(13), ( ) ( ) G = km 24πa cos = km 6 a 24π a cos. (25) 6 a It may be ealized that the limit a is singula, which suggests that the paamete a cannot be small. Futhemoe eq.(25) shows that the vacuum density nea the Sun would be of ode M/( a R), incompatible with obsevations except if a >> R 2. 6

7 With steps simila to those leading to eqs.(17) to (22), we get kρ eff = G t t = km 72π a cosx, kp eff θ kp eff = G = km (cosx + x sin x), 6π3 = G θ θ = km 12π 3 [( 1 x 2 ) cosx + x sin x ], whee α km 4π km (cosx + x sin x), 12π β km 4π km 12π cosx, X R 6 a, x 6 a. Hence the PPM paamete γ is γ = 3 cosx x sin x. 3 + cosx Fo x = X, that is nea the suface of the Sun, γ is close to 1 only fo values of X such that X tan X 2 but, fo these values of X, γ is vey diffeent fom 1 wheneve x is not vey close to X. We conclude that the theoy esting upon eqs.(4) and (5) is incompatible with Sola System obsevations fo any a <. III. Stability of γ = 4/3 polytopes. Application to white dwafs In ode to know the vacuum stess-enegy tenso in the inteio of a sta we must solve eq.(9). An exact solution is athe involved and, in addition, it pesents the poblem that it is a (nonlinea) fouth ode diffeential equation. Thus we need fixing 4 bounday conditions, which may give ise to some ambiguity. Hee I shall seach fo solutions appopiate fo stas which may be teated as Newtonian with small coections, that is excluding compact objects like neuton stas. In this case 2aG << 1 and eq.(15) is a good enough appoximation. If we combine it with eq.(6) (this one with the sta symbols emoved) we get Tµν vac = 1 3 g µνt vac + 2aΓ 1 d(t mat + T vac ) µν 2aδ 1 d 2 (T mat + T vac ) µ δ1 ν. (26) 2 7

8 This equation shows that T vac µν is ode a, so that to fist ode in that paamete we may neglect T vac in the last two tems. If we use the appoximations eqs.(16) it is staightfowad to get the components of the vacuum stess-enegy tenso in tems of the tace of the matte tenso. Still we may appoximate T mat ρ mat >> p mat and we get ρ vac p vac = 2a 2 ρ mat 4a = 4a dρ mat, pvac θ dρ mat = 2a + 2a d2 ρ mat, 2 dρ mat Also it is easy to get the mass inside a sphee of adius, that is m vac () = 2a d2 ρ mat 2. (27) 4π 2 ρ vac = 8πa 2dρmat. (28) An inteesting consequence is that vacuum effects do no contibute diectly to the mass of the sta, that is m vac (R) = because dρ mat / is zeo at the sta suface. In the following I shall apply these esults to the study of stability of polytopes, that is Newtonian stas with equation of state of the fom p = Kρ γ. It is well known that polytopes ae stable if γ > 4/3 and unstable if γ > 4/3. If γ = 4/3 the stability depends on small coections. In paticula, geneal elativistic coections poduces unstability, although othe coections may compensate fo that. The most elevant types of sta which may be teated as γ = 4/3 polytopes ae white dwafs and supemassive stas. Both ae stable when the intenal enegy is lage enough, but become unstable afte adiating a faction of that enegy. In both cases it is assumed that a souce of unstability ae the elativistic coections, although in some white dwafs also neutonization of the coe may induce unstabilility. In this section I study how the vacuum coections, assumed in the pesent pape, influence the stability of these polytopes. I shall study white dwafs but not supemassive stas. Indeed the latte ae hypothetical and obsevations on them ae nil o scace. In addition the possible coections due to the quantum vacuum, as they ae poposed in the pesent pape, would be vey small because typical dimensions of supemassive stas ae fa lage than the limit eq.(24). White dwafs ae fomed fom odinay stas afte a peiod of cooling. The theoy hee consideed coesponds to stas sufficiently cold to be teated as if the tempeatue is zeo. Then the binding enegy of a sta is given by [ ] R E = M m H N 4π 2 m H n ρ 1 2Gm/ R 4π 2 [ (ρ m H n) Gm 1 m H n ], (29) whee M is the mass, N its bayon numbe, R the adius, m H the mass of the hyogen atom, ρ () the mass density, n () the bayon density and G is Newton constant (no 8

9 confusion should aise with the Einstein tenso because we will no longe use G fo that.) The last expession of eq.(29) coesponds to the Newtonian appoximation, the fist tem being the intenal enegy and the second one the gavitational enegy (see, e. g. Ref. 1 fo details). Coections of geneal elativity have been calculated to fist ode in GM/R with espect to the Newtonian enegy. Hee I shall calculate vacuum coections to fist ode in the paamete a stating fom the Newtonian appoximation, last expession of eq.(29). The vacuum coection to the enegy, E vac, modifies the density, ρ (), and hence the mass, m (), with the addition of tems which should be taken fom eq.(27). Thus eq.(29) leads to E vac = R = 2a 4π 2 [ ρ vac G 1 m H nm vac] [ d 2 (ρ mat ) 4π 2 R ] Gρ mat 4π 2dρmat, (3) whee I have substituted ρ mat fo m H n, which is valid to ou ode of appoximation. The fist tem is zeo (it equals m vac (R), see eq.(28)). It is inteesting that vacuum coections do not modify the intenal eneegy (fist tem of eq.(29)) but only the gavitational enegy, making it less negative. Afte appopiate integations by pats the second tem leads to E vac = FGMρ c, F 12πaGξ 2 1 θ (ξ 1 ) 1 ξ1 θ 6 ξ 2 dξ.35ag. (31) whee ξ and θ ae the Lane-Emden vaiables, ρ c is the cental density and the integal has been calculated numeically. Adding the vacuum coection, eq.(31), to the standad expession fo the enegy we obtain fom eq.(29), ( ) E = B M 2/3 Ch M2/3 Mρ 1/3 c + CMρ 1/3 c DM 7/3 ρ 2/3 c + FMρ c, (32) whee I follow the notation of Ref., 1 M Ch being the Chanasekha limiting mass. The fist tem in eq.(32) is the Newtonian enegy, the second is due to the depatue of the equation of state fom a γ = 4/3 polytope, the thid one is the coection of geneal elativity and the last tem is the vacuum coection. Fo a given mass, the cental density of equilibium is obtained when de/dρ c =, which leads to ( ) B M 2/3 Ch M2/3 Cρ 2/3 c 2DM 4/3 ρ 1/3 c + 3Fρ 2/3 c =. (33) Taking into account that the paametes B, C, D ae positive, it is easy to see that if F = no value (positive) of ρ c fulfils eq.(33) wheneve M > M Ch, that is equilibium is not possible. In shap contast a value of ρ c fulfilling eq.(33) exists fo any mass if F >. In fact the quantity in the left side of eq.(33) appoaches + when ρ c and - when ρ c, so that it is necessaily zeo fo some positive value of ρ c. 9

10 Fo a mass, M, well below the Chanasekha limit the tems with D and F may be consideed small in compaison with those with B and C and the cental density of equilibium is ρ c ρ + 3DM4/3 ρ 2 C 9F 2C ρ7/3, ρ B C ( ) M 2/3 Ch M2/3 3/2. (34) When M appoaches the Chanasekha limit, M Ch, eq.(34)diveges and the appoximations leading to it ae not valid. I shall not attempt to solve eq.(33) fo M close to M Ch, which would be cumbesome and not vey inteesting. When M >> M Ch an appoximate solution of eq.(33) is again possible, leading to the simple expession ( ) ρ c B M 2/3 M 2/3 Ch 3F 3/2.48a 3/2 ( M 2/3 M 2/3 Ch ) 3/2. (35) Stability equies that d 2 E/dρ 2 c >. When de/dρ c = the stability condition leads to Cρ 1 c DM 4/3 + 3Fρ 1/3 c. (36) If F =, equilibium is stable fo any mass below a limit smalle than but close to the Chanasekha mass. In the limit the sta will possess a cental density ρ cit C D M 4/3 ch = (µ e /2) 2 kg/m 3, (37) whee µ e is the numbe of bayons pe electon (µ e 2). If F > stas may be in equilibium fo any mass, as said above. It is emakable that the hyostatic equilibium is always stable, i. e. fo any mass, M, and fo any value of F >. In fact eq.(33) may be ewitten 3FMρ 2/3 c ( = B M 2/3 M 2/3 Ch ) M + CMρ 2/3 c + 2DM 7/3 ρ 1/3 c > DM 4/3 Cρ 1 c, so that eq.(36) holds tue (taking into account that B, C, D >, M > M Ch.) Actually this esult is athe academic because fo small F, that is the paamete a below the limit eq.(24), cental density of equilibium of stas with M lage than M Ch would be so lage that the sta becomes unstable against neutonization. In summay, vacuum coections give ise to amatic changes in the hyostatic equilibium and stability of white dwafs, but these changes give ise to vey small obsevable effects because they ae hidden by the existence of unstabilities due to neutonization. 1

11 IV. Hyostatic equilibium. Application to the inteio of the Sun. In ode to see the effect of the vacuum contibutions on the stuctue of stas we shall wite the hyostatic equilibium equation appopiate fo local anisotopy, that is adial pessue diffeent fom tansvese pessue. (Local anisotopy is due to the vacuum contibution, as seen in eqs.(27), but we assume that matte adial and tansvese pessues ae equal.) We have 11 whee dp + 2 (p p θ ) = k m + 4π 3 p 2 4π 2 km (ρ + p ), (38) ρ = ρ mat + ρ vac, p = p mat + p vac Taking into account eqs.(27) and (28) this leads to dp mat = k 2 It is inteesting the cancellation m mat + 4π 3 p mat 8πa 2 dρmat 4π 2 km mat 8πak 3 dρ mat dp vac + 2 (p p θ ) = dpvac, p θ = p mat + p vac θ, m = 4π 2 ρ. (39) (ρ mat + p mat + 2a d2 ρ mat + 2 (pvac p vac θ ) =. 2 ). (4) Eq.(4) may be tansfomed into an odinay diffeential equation of thid ode (e.g. in the vaiable m() ) if p mat is witten in tems of ρ mat via the equation of state. Then we may use the initial conditions m mat () = and [dρ mat /] = = and only one condition emains, e. g. fixing the cental density, ρ mat (). Thus the solutions of eq.(4) consist of a one-paamete family as in the standad theoy of stas in equilibium. Assuming that both the elativistic and the vacuum coections ae small, eq.(4) may be appoximated as dp mat = kmmat 8π 2 ρmat (1 + GR + vacuum), (41) GR 4π3 p mat + kmmat + pmat m mat 4π ρ mat, vacuum 2a 4π2 dρ mat m mat + 2a ρ mat d 2 ρ mat 2. It may be ealized that the fist facto on the ight side epesents the Newtonian appoximation, the 3 tems labelled GR ae the well known coections of geneal elativity and those labelled vacuum ae coections due to the vacuum stess-enegy. 11

12 The fome (latte) ae ode GM/R (ode a/r 2 ) with espect to the Newtonian appoximation. I have ignoed tems which ae both vacuum and geneal-elativistic coections, that is ode GMa/R 3 with espect to the Newtonian appoximation. As may be seen, and it is well known, the thee elativistic coections inside the backet ae positive, that is evey one contibutes to the incease of gavitational effects. In contast the second tems of vacuum is negative in the cental egion of the sta because d 2 ρ mat / 2 is negative thee. Howeve the fist tem is positive eveywhee and the second one is also positive nea the suface. Consequently no conclusion is possible about whethe the vacuum coections incease o decease the effects of gavity in compaison with the Newtonian appoximation. The elative impotance of the vacuum and geneal elativistic coections may be estimated fom the atio of the fist vacuum coection to the fist elativistic coection in eq.(41). It is vacuum GR 2a dρ mat p mat a R ρmat 2 pmat. (42) In Newtonian stas the fist facto on the ight side is small, as shown in the second section, and the second facto is lage. Thus no conclusion may be eached (in any case both coections ae small). In compact objects like neuton stas the second facto is ode unity and the fist one might be lage. Theefoe the vacuum coections could be elevant. Howeve in these stas many of the appoximations leading to eq.(41) ae not valid and a calculation stating fom eq.(11) would be necessay. In the following I study the effects of the vacuum coections in the intenal popeties of the Sun. I shall conside, in paticula, the change in cental pessue due to the coection tems given in eq.(41). The change in the cental pessue will be δp mat () = = ak 4π R dδp mat [ R = ak R 4π 4πρ matdρmat + m mat ρ mat [ 4π2 2 R m mat 2 dρ mat m mat ]. d 2 ρ mat ] d 2 ρ mat ρ mat 2 An integation by pats of the second tem gives an integated pat which is zeo, a tem which combines with the fist one and can be integated easily and a new tem. In fact we have δp mat () = ak [ ρ mat () ]2 + ak R m mat dρ mat 4π 3. The integal in the second tem may be pefomed numeically using data of the calculations made by Bahcall et al.. 12 The esult is conveniently witten as follows δp mat 2aG M kg/m 3 = a 131 kg/m 3 c 2 R 3 R 2 12

13 The cental pessue is (in units of mass/volume) p mat = 1.19 ρkt m H c 2 =.264 kg/m3, whee m H is the mass of the hyogen atom and the facto 1.19 is the mean numbe of paticle pe bayon, which deives fom the chemical composition in cente of the Sun that is 35% hyogen and 65% helium. Hence we get δp mat () p mat () 5 a R 2 <.5, (43) whee the inequality follows fom the bound eq.(24). Actually it is unlikely that the calculations of the stuctue of the Sun give an eo in the cental pessue which supasses 1%. 12 Indeed the esults of the calculations agee vey well with measuements of helioseismology and, afte the discovey of neutino oscillations, with the emission of neutions. 13 Consequently the atio eq.(43) should be, at least, 5 times smalle than the limit shown in that equation. Thus ou knowledge about the inteio of the Sun povides a bound moe stingent than measuements in the Sola System, eq.(24). The bound is V. Conclusions 6a 1 9 R 78 km. If we believe that the quantum vacuum in cuved spacetime gives ise to some stess-enegy, it is plausible that the gavitational effect of this contibution is equivalent to adding a tem ar 2 to the standad tem R of the Einstein-Hilbet action, at least if the cuvatue scala R is small. The pesence of this tem should give ise to effects obsevable, in pinciple, in the Sola System. Then the pesent knowledge puts bounds on the possible values of the paamete a, namely a < km 2. Also the vacuum stess-enegy will poduce some effects in the stuctue of Newtonian stas. In paticula in white dwafs it would poduce stable hyostatic equilibium in stas above the Chanasekha limit, but the effect could not be obseved because such stas would be unstable against neutonization. The effect of the vacuum stessenegy on the intenal stuctue of the Sun should be vey small because calculations, pefomed without consideing that effect, agee vey well with obsevations. This povides a new bound on the paamete a which is about 5 times smalle than the one deived fom obsevations in the exteio of the Sun. 13

14 VI. Reseach Bibliogaphy 1 N. D. Biell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum fields in cuved space. Cambidge Univesity Pess, R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 17, 1477 (1978); Quantum field theoy in cuved spacetimes and black hole themodynamics, The univesity of Chicago Pess, Chicago, Vaum Sahni, Dak matte and dak enegy, Lec. Notes Phys. 653, 141 (24). AXiv: asto-ph/43324v3. 4 T. P. Sotiiou and V. Faaoni, AXiv: g-qc/ v3. 5 Zel dovich, Sov. Phys. Usp. 24, 216 (1981). 6 J. L. Synge, Relativity:The geneal theoy. Intescience Publishes, New Yok, T. Clifton, Class. Quantum Gav. 23, 7445 (26). 8 T. Chiba, T. L. Smith, and A. L. Eickcek, Phys. Rev. D 75, (27); G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D 75, (27). 9 B. Betotti, L. Iess, and P. Totoa, Natue 425, 374 (23); S. S. Shapio, J. L. Davis, D. E. Lebachand, and J. S. Gegoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, (24). 1 S. L. Shapio and S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwafs and neuton stas. John Wiley and Sons, New Yok, L. Heea, and N. O. Santos, Phys. Rep. 286, 53 (1997). 12 N. A. Bahcall, and M. H. Pinsonneault, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 885 (1992). 13 M. C. González-Gacía, and Yosef Ni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 345 (23). 14