arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 15 Jul 1999
|
|
- Georgia Ryan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Quantum information processing using quantum dot spins and cavity-qed A. Imamoḡlu 1,2, D. D. Awschalom 2, G. Burkard 3, D. P. DiVincenzo 3, D. Loss 3, M. Sherwin 2, A. Small 2 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland 4 IBM Research Division, T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY (February 1, 2008) arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 15 Jul 1999 The electronic spin degrees of freedom in semiconductors typically have decoherence times that are several orders of magnitude longer than other relevant timescales. A solid-state quantum computer based on localized electron spins as qubits is therefore of potential interest. Here, a scheme that realizes controlled interactions between two distant quantum dot spins is proposed. The effective long-range interaction is mediated by the vacuum field of a high finesse microcavity. By using conduction-band-hole Raman transitions induced by classical laser fields and the cavity-mode, parallel controlled-not operations and arbitrary single qubit rotations can be realized. Optical techniques can also be used to measure the spin-state of each quantum dot Lx, Dv, Bz Within the last few years, quantum computation (QC) has developed into a truly interdisciplinary field involving the contributions of physicists, engineers, and computer scientists [1]. The seminal discoveries of Shor and others, both in developing quantum algorithms for important problems like prime factorization [2], and in developing protocols for quantum error correction (QEC) [3] and fault-tolerant quantum computation [4], have indicated the desirability and the ultimate feasibility of the experimental realization of QC in various quantum systems. The elementary unit in most QC schemes is a twostate system referred to as a quantum bit (qubit). Since QEC can only work if the decoherence rate is small, it is crucial to identify schemes where the qubits are well isolated from their environment. Ingenious schemes based on Raman-coupled low-energy states of trapped ions [5] and nuclear spins in chemical solutions [6] satisfy this criterion, in addition to providing methods of fast quantum manipulation of qubits that do not introduce significant decoherence. Even though these schemes are likely to provide the first examples of quantum information processing at 5-10 qubit level, they do not appear to be scalable to larger systems containing more than 100 qubits. Here, we propose a new scheme for quantum information processing based on quantum dot (QD) electron spins coupled through a microcavity mode. The motivation for this scheme is threefold: (1) a QC scheme based on semiconductor quantum dot arrays should be scalable to 100 coupled qubits; (2) recent experiments demonstrated very long spin decoherence times for conduction band electrons in III-V and II-VI semiconductors [7], making electron spin a likely candidate for a qubit; and (3) cavity-qed techniques can provide longdistance, fast interactions between qubits [8]. The QC scheme detailed below relies on the use of a single cavity mode and laser fields to mediate coherent interactions between distant QD spins. As we will show shortly, the proposed scheme does not require that QDs be identical and can be used to carry out parallel quantum logic operations [9]. We note that a QC scheme based on electron spins in QDs have been previously proposed [10]: this scheme is based on local exchange interactions controlled by electrodes. The possibility of coherently manipulating motional degrees of freedom of QD electrons using terahertz cavity-qed has also been discussed [11]. Other all-solidstate QC schemes include the scheme by Kane to implement NMR in doped silicon wafers [12]. The principal feature that distinguishes the present proposal from its predecessors is the use of all-optical Raman transitions to couple two conduction-band spin states: this potentially enables us to combine the ultra-long spin coherence times with fast, long-distance, parallel optical switching. The proposed scheme is detailed in Figure 1: the doped QDs are embedded in a microdisk structure with diameter d 2µ and thickness d 0.1µ. Motivation for choosing this structure over other alternatives comes from recent experiments demonstrating that InAs self-assembled QDs can be embedded in microdisk structures with a cavity quality factor Q 12, 000 [13]. We assume that the QDs are designed such that the quantum confinement along the z-direction is the strongest: this is the case both in QDs defined by electrical gates and in self-assembled QDs. The in-plane confinement is also assumed to be large enough to guarantee that the electron will always be in the ground-state orbital. Because of the strong z- azis confinement, the lowest energy eigenstates of such a III-V or II-VI semiconductor QD consist of m z = ±1/2 conduction-band states and m z = ±3/2 valence-band states. The QDs are doped such that each QD has a full valence band and a single conduction band electron: we assume that a uniform magnetic field along the x- direction (B x ) is applied, so the QD qubit is defined 1
2 by the conduction-band states m x = 1/2 = and m x = 1/2 = (Fig. 2). The corresponding energies are hω and hω, respectively. One of the key elements of the proposed scheme is the Raman coupling of the two spin eigenstates via strong laser fields and a single-mode microcavity mode. Since the QD array dimensions are assumed to be on the order of several microns, we assume that the laser fields are coupled selectively to given QDs using near-field techniques; e.g. via tapered fiber tips. The 1-bit operations proceed by applying two laser fields E L,x (t) and E L,y (t) with Rabi frequencies Ω L,x and Ω L,y, and frequencies ω L,x and ω L,y (polarized along the x and y directions, respectively) that exactly satisfy the Raman-resonance condition between and. The laser fields are turned on for a short time duration that satisfies a π/r-pulse condition, where r is any real number. The process can be best understood as a Raman π/r-pulse for the hole in the conduction band state. The laser field polarizations should have non-parallel components in order to create a non-zero Raman coupling (if there is no heavy-hole lighthole mixing). These arbitrary single-bit rotations can naturally be carried out in parallel. In addition, the QDs that are not doped by a single electron never couple to the Raman fields and can safely be ignored. The fundamental step in the implementation of 2-qubit operations is the selective coupling between the control and target qubits that is mediated by the microcavity field. To this end, we assume that the cavity-mode with energy hω cav (assumed to be x-polarized) and a laser field (assumed to be y-polarized) establishes the Raman transition between the two conduction-band states, in close analogy with the atomic cavity-qed schemes [8]. After eliminating the valence band states [14], we obtain the effective Hamiltonian ( h = 1) [ Ĥ eff = ω cav â cavâcav + i where ω ˆσi i g2 cav ω i ˆσ i â cavâcav (Ωi L,y )2 [ ω i ˆσ i + igeff i â cavˆσ e i iωi L,y t h.c.] ], (1) g i eff (t) = g cavω i L,y (t) 2 ( 1 ω i ) + 1 ω i (2) is the effective 2-photon coupling coefficient for the spins of the i th QD. â cav denotes the cavity mode annihilation operator and ˆσ i = is the spin projection operator for the i th QD. The exact two-photon-resonance condition would be ω i = ωi ωi v ω cav = ω i = ω i ωi v ωi L. hωi v denotes the energy of the relevant valence band states [15], and ω i = ωi ωi. The derivation of Ĥ eff assumes ω, i g cav, ω i k BT, and gi eff > Γ cav, where Γ cav denotes the cavity decay rate (not included in Eq. (1)). The third and fourth ω i,j terms of Eq. (1) describe the ac-stark-effect caused by the cavity and laser fields, respectively. The first step in the implementation of a CNOT operation would be to turn on laser fields ω i L and ωj L to establish near two-photon resonance condition for both the control (i) and the target (j) qubits: i = ω i ω cav + ω i L = j ω i,j. (3) If we choose two-photon detunings i large compared to the cavity linewidth and geff i (t), we can eliminate the cavity-degrees-of-freedom [14] to obtain an effective twoqubit interaction Hamiltonian in the rotating frame (interaction picture with H 0 = i ωi ˆσi ): Ĥ (2) int = [ g ij (t) ˆσ ˆσj i ei ijt + ˆσ ˆσi j e i ijt], (4) i j where g ij (t) = geff i (t)gj eff (t)/ i and ij = i j. Equation (4) is one of the principal results of this Letter: it shows that Raman coupling via a common cavity mode can establish fully controllable long-range transverse spin-spin interactions between two distant QD electrons, by choosing ωl i and ωj L such that ij = 0. We can see from Ĥ(2) int that the size non-uniformity of QDs is in principle completely irrelevant for the proposed scheme: small differences in g-factor between different QDs can be adjusted by the choice of ωl i and ωj L. The additional single-spin terms of the effective interaction Hamiltonian (not shown in Eq. (4)) induce single qubit phase-shifts; however, these terms can be safely discarded since they are smaller than the ac-stark terms of Eq. (1). Next, we turn to the implementation of the conditional phase-flip (CPF) operation between spins i and j: to this end, we set ij = 0 and obtain Ĥ (2) int,ij = g ij(t) i [ˆσ 2 yˆσ y j + z] ˆσi zˆσj, (5) where ˆσ y and ˆσ z are the Pauli operators. In this form, we recognize that the effective interaction Hamiltonian between two QDs is that of transverse spin-spin coupling. Previously, the possibility of carrying out universal QC has been shown for Hamiltonians of the form H JS i Sj [10]. For the transverse spin-spin coupling of Eq. (5), we find that a non-trivial two-qubit gate, such as the conditional-phase-flip (CPF) operation, can be carried out by combining Ĥ(2) int,ij with one-bit rotations. The unitary evolution operator under the Hamiltonian of Eq. (5) is [ Û XY (φ) = T exp i dtĥ(2) int,ij ], (6) where φ = dt g ij (t). The CPF gate (ÛCPF) can be realized by the sequence of operators Û CPF = e iπ/4 e iπni σi/3 e iπnj σj/3 Û XY (π/4) e iπσi z /2 Û XY (π/4)e iπσi y /4 e iπσj y /4, (7) 2
3 where σ denotes the vector Pauli operator, n i = (1, 1, 1)/ 3, and n j = ( 1, 1, 1)/ 3. Note that all operators in this sequence are understood in the interaction picture defined above in Eq. (4). The controlled-not gate can be realized by combining the CPF operation with single-qubit rotations ÛCNOT = exp[ iπσz/4] j ÛCPF exp[iπσz/4]. j Equation (4) also indicates that two-qubit interactions such as the CPF operation can be carried out in parallel. To see how this works, we consider for simplicity 4 QDs where we set a = c and b = d and choose ab g ij (t) (i, j = a, b, c, d; i j), by adjusting the corresponding laser frequencies (Fig. 1). For these parameters, QDs a and c (as well as b and d) will couple to each other via the transverse spin-spin interaction of Eq. (5), whereas the coupling between all other pairings of QDs will be energy non-conserving and average out to zero. Generalizing this procedure, we find that a single cavity-mode can be used to carry out many parallel 2-qubit operations. An analogous method to achieve parallel operations in ion-trap QC was described in Ref. [9]. The time required to complete a 2-qubit gate operation in this scheme will be limited by the strength of the electron-hole-cavity coupling. 1-bit operations can be completed in 10 psec time scale, assuming Ω L,x, Ω L,y 1 mev, and ω i ωi 5 mev. If we assume g cav i 0.5 mev, we find g ij 0.02 mev and that CPF operation can be carried out in 100 psec. For InAs self-assembling QDs, g cav 0.1 mev for a typical cavity volume V cav = 4(2πc n /ω cav ) 3, where c n is the speed of light in the medium. It should be possible to obtain g cav 0.5 mev by utilizing large area QDs [16]. One of the key issues in the feasability of a quantum information processing scheme is the relative magnitude of the decoherence rates as compared to the gate-operation time. As indicated earlier, our scheme is motivated by the 1 µsec long coherence times of conduction band electrons observed in doped QW and bulk semiconductors [7]. Recent experiments in undoped QDs on the other hand indicate that spin decoherence times are at least as long as 3 nsec even in the presence of valence band holes [18]; the corresponding times for undoped QW structures is on the order of 50 psec. It should therefore be safe to assume that at least in an ideal system such as GaAs QDs embedded in AlGaAs, the spin decoherence times will be around 1 µsec. The principal spin decoherence mechanism in QDs is the strong spin-orbit interaction in the valence-band. Presence of (valence-band) holes therefore could potentially increase the decoherence rate by several orders of magnitude. By utilizing the Raman scheme, we only create virtual holes with a probability of 0.01 for the assumed values of Ω L,y, ω i, ωi. If the hole-spin decoherence time is 1 nsec, this could give rise to an effective decoherence time of 100 nsec; we reiterate however that this gate error only appears in the presence of the laser fields. In the cavity-qed scheme that we propose, the finite cavity lifetime (Γ 1 cav 10 psec) also introduces a decoherence mechanism. However, since the cavity-mode is also only virtually excited during the transverse spinspin interaction (with probability 0.01 for the assumed parameters), the effective decoherence time will be on the order of 1 nsec. Therefore, the primary technological limitation for the proposed scheme is the relatively fast photon loss rate. This rate can be improved either by new processing techniques for microdisk structures, or by coupling QDs to ultra-high finesse cavities of silica microspheres [17]. Finally, the accurate measurement of the spin state of each qubit is an essential requirement in a QC scheme. In our system, this can be achieved by applying a laser field E L,y to the QD to be measured, in order to realize exact two-photon resonance with the cavity mode. If the QD spin is in state, there is no Raman coupling and no photons will be detected. If on the other hand, the spin state is, the electron will exchange energy with the cavity mode and eventually a single photon will leak out of the cavity. A single photon detection capability is sufficient for detecting a single spin. One of the key assumptions of our scheme is the need to address each QD selectively. Using state-of-the-art near-field techniques can give us resolution that is on the order of 1000 Å, which in turn gives an upper limit of 20 as the total number of QDs that can be coupled to a single cavity-mode. An alternative method to couple larger number of QDs could be to use the electric field dependence of the electron g-factor g elec in semiconductors [19]. An ideal situation for the proposed scheme is to design the system such that each QD will have a dedicated gate electrode that can be used to switch its g elec and hence bring the QD in and out of Raman resonance with the laser and cavity-modes [11]. The laser fields can still be pulsed, but need not be localized spatially. In summary, we have described a new quantum information processing scheme based on QDs strongly coupled to a microcavity mode. The primary achievement of this scheme is the realization of parallel, long-range transverse spin-spin interactions between conduction band electrons, mediated by the cavity mode. Such interactions can be used to carry out quantum computation. Currently, the primary technological limitation of the proposed scheme is the short photon lifetime in stateof-the-art microcavities. Further improvements on the ratio of gate operation time to decoherence times may be achieved using adiabatic passage schemes to eliminate or minimize the virtual amplitude generated in the cavitymode and the valence-band hole states. The Hamiltonian of Eq. (4) can also be used to achieve quantum state transfer from one QD to another, along the lines described in the context of atomic cavity-qed. We thank J.-M. Gerard and B. Gayral for sharing their results on microdisks before publication. A. I. would also like to thank A. Sorensen and K. Molmer for bringing to his attention Ref. [9], which was very helpful in demonstrating parallel two-qubit operations. This work is supported by the grants ARO DAAG and 3
4 DAAG55-98-C A. I. acknowledges the support of a David and Lucile Packard Fellowship. G. B. and D. L. acknowledge funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation. A. S. acknowledges a NSF graduate fellowship. [1] A. Steane, Rept. Prog. Phys. 61, 117 (1998). [2] P. W. Shor, in Proc. 35th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, (IEEE Computer Society Press), 124 (1994). [3] P. W. Shor, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995); A. Steane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996). [4] P. W. Shor, in Proc. 37th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, (IEEE Computer Society Press), 56 (1996). [5] J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995). [6] D. Cory, A. Fahmy, and T. Havel, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 1634 (1997); N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997). [7] J. M. Kikkawa, I. P. Smorchkova, N. Samarth, D. D. Awschalom, Science 277, 1284 (1997). [8] T. Pellizzari, S. A. Gardiner, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3788 (1995). [9] A. Sorensen and K. Molmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971 (1999). [10] D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998); G. Burkard, D. Loss, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999). [11] M. Sherwin, A. Imamoḡlu, and T. Montroy, quantph/ [12] B. Kane, Nature 393, 133 (1998). [13] J.-M. Gerard and B. Gayral, in QED phenomena and applications of microcavities and photonic crystals, H. Benisty, J.-M. Gerard, and C. Weisbuch, eds., (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999). [14] O. Madelung, Introduction to Solid-State Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1978), p [15] Due to the quantum confinement induced splitting between the m z = ±1/2 and m z = ±3/2 states, the applied field can only slightly shift the energies of the m z = ±3/2 states: we neglect this shift and use a single value ω i v. This assumption is justified provided that the energy shift is much smaller than ω i and ω i. [16] We point out that strong coupling of a QD to a single cavity mode, which is a principal feature of the proposed scheme, is still not observed experimentally. However, recent experiments in QDs coupled to microdisks [13] and silica microspheres [17] indicate that strong coupling could be observed in the near future. [17] X. Fan, H. Wang, and M. Lorengan, Post-deadline proceedings of Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference (1999). [18] J. A. Gupta, D. D. Awschalom, X. Peng, and A. P. Alivisatos, Phys. Rev. B 59, (1999). The actual spin coherence time is longer since experimental evidence indicates that the measured system is inhomogeneously broadened and the measured times are limited by the variations in the g-factor. [19] E. L. Ivchenko, A. A. Kiselev, and M. Willander, Solid State Comm. 102, 375 (1997). FIG. 1. The quantum information processing scheme that is based on quantum dots embedded inside a microdisk structure. Each quantum dot is addressed selectively by a laser field from a fiber-tip. The laser frequencies are chosen to select out the pair of quantum dots that will participate in gate operation. All dots strongly couple to a single cavity-mode. FIG. 2. The relevant energy levels of a III-V (or II-VI) semiconductor quantum dot. It is assumed that confinement along the z-direction is strongest. 4
5 ω a b c d L ω L ω L ω L (a) side view (b) top view Fig.1
6 ω m x =1/2> m x = -1/2> ω cav ω L ω L ω cav ω m z = -3/2> m z =3/2> m z = -1/2> m z =1/2> Fig.2
Coupling nanocrystals to a high-q silica microsphere: entanglement in quantum dots via photon exchange
Coupling nanocrystals to a high-q silica microsphere: entanglement in quantum dots via photon exchange Todd A. Brun Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 1513 Hailin Wang Department
More informationSingle Semiconductor Nanostructures for Quantum Photonics Applications: A solid-state cavity-qed system with semiconductor quantum dots
The 3 rd GCOE Symposium 2/17-19, 19, 2011 Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Single Semiconductor Nanostructures for Quantum Photonics Applications: A solid-state cavity-qed system with semiconductor quantum
More informationRequirements for scaleable QIP
p. 1/25 Requirements for scaleable QIP These requirements were presented in a very influential paper by David Divincenzo, and are widely used to determine if a particular physical system could potentially
More informationQuantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Lectures 14-15
Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Lectures 14-15 15 Marianna Safronova Department of Physics and Astronomy Back to the real world: What do we need to build a quantum computer? Qubits which retain
More informationP 3/2 P 1/2 F = -1.5 F S 1/2. n=3. n=3. n=0. optical dipole force is state dependent. n=0
(two-qubit gate): tools: optical dipole force P 3/2 P 1/2 F = -1.5 F n=3 n=3 n=0 S 1/2 n=0 optical dipole force is state dependent tools: optical dipole force (e.g two qubits) ω 2 k1 d ω 1 optical dipole
More informationElectron spins in nonmagnetic semiconductors
Electron spins in nonmagnetic semiconductors Yuichiro K. Kato Institute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo Physics of non-interacting spins Optical spin injection and detection Spin manipulation
More informationImage courtesy of Keith Schwab http://www.lbl.gov/science-articles/archive/afrd Articles/Archive/AFRD-quantum-logic.html http://www.wmi.badw.de/sfb631/tps/dqd2.gif http://qist.lanl.gov/qcomp_map.shtml
More informationShort Course in Quantum Information Lecture 8 Physical Implementations
Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 8 Physical Implementations Course Info All materials downloadable @ website http://info.phys.unm.edu/~deutschgroup/deutschclasses.html Syllabus Lecture : Intro
More informationQuantum computing hardware
Quantum computing hardware aka Experimental Aspects of Quantum Computation PHYS 576 Class format 1 st hour: introduction by BB 2 nd and 3 rd hour: two student presentations, about 40 minutes each followed
More informationAll optical quantum computation by engineering semiconductor. macroatoms. Irene D Amico. Dept. of Physics, University of York
All optical quantum computation by engineering semiconductor macroatoms Irene D Amico Dept. of Physics, University of York (Institute for Scientific Interchange, Torino) GaAs/AlAs, GaN/AlN Eliana Biolatti
More informationExperimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview
Experimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview Dr. Suzanne Gildert Condensed Matter Physics Research (Quantum Devices Group) University of Birmingham, UK 15/02/10 Models of quantum computation Implementations
More informationDeterministic Coherent Writing and Control of the Dark Exciton Spin using Short Single Optical Pulses
Deterministic Coherent Writing and Control of the Dark Exciton Spin using Short Single Optical Pulses Ido Schwartz, Dan Cogan, Emma Schmidgall, Liron Gantz, Yaroslav Don and David Gershoni The Physics
More informationQuantum Computation 650 Spring 2009 Lectures The World of Quantum Information. Quantum Information: fundamental principles
Quantum Computation 650 Spring 2009 Lectures 1-21 The World of Quantum Information Marianna Safronova Department of Physics and Astronomy February 10, 2009 Outline Quantum Information: fundamental principles
More informationFast nonadiabatic two-qubit gates for the Kane quantum computer
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 68, 012321 2003 Fast nonadiabatic two-qubit gates for the Kane quantum computer Charles D. Hill 1, * and Hsi-Sheng Goan 2, 1 Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, and Department of
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v3 19 May 1997
Correcting the effects of spontaneous emission on cold-trapped ions C. D Helon and G.J. Milburn Department of Physics University of Queensland St Lucia 407 Australia arxiv:quant-ph/9610031 v3 19 May 1997
More informationCoherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot. Sophia Economou NRL. L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan
Coherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot Sophia Economou Collaborators: NRL L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan T. L. Reinecke, Naval Research Lab Outline
More informationSemiconductors: Applications in spintronics and quantum computation. Tatiana G. Rappoport Advanced Summer School Cinvestav 2005
Semiconductors: Applications in spintronics and quantum computation Advanced Summer School 1 I. Background II. Spintronics Spin generation (magnetic semiconductors) Spin detection III. Spintronics - electron
More informationQuantum Dot Lasers Using High-Q Microdisk Cavities
phys. stat. sol. (b) 224, No. 3, 797 801 (2001) Quantum Dot Lasers Using High-Q Microdisk Cavities P. Michler 1; *Þ (a), A. Kiraz (a), C. Becher (a), Lidong Zhang (a), E. Hu (a), A. Imamoglu (a), W. V.
More informationOptical control and decoherence of spin qubits in quantum dots
Materials Science-Poland, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2008 Optical control and decoherence of spin qubits in quantum dots P. MACHNIKOWSKI 1*, A. GRODECKA 1,2**, C. WEBER 2***, A. KNORR 2 1 Institute of Physics, Wrocław
More informationCavity QED with quantum dots in microcavities
Cavity QED with quantum dots in microcavities Martin van Exter, Morten Bakker, Thomas Ruytenberg, Wolfgang Löffler, Dirk Bouwmeester (Leiden) Ajit Barve, Larry Coldren (UCSB) Motivation and Applications
More informationQUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY QUANTUM COMPUTING. Philippe Grangier, Institut d'optique, Orsay. from basic principles to practical realizations.
QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY QUANTUM COMPUTING Philippe Grangier, Institut d'optique, Orsay 1. Quantum cryptography : from basic principles to practical realizations. 2. Quantum computing : a conceptual revolution
More informationQuantum Computation with Spins and Excitons in Semiconductor Quantum Dots (Part III)
Quantum Computation with Spins and Excitons in Semiconductor Quantum Dots (Part III) Carlo Piermarocchi Condensed Matter Theory Group Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University, East
More informationSpin electric coupling and coherent quantum control of molecular nanomagnets
Spin electric coupling and coherent quantum control of molecular nanomagnets Dimitrije Stepanenko Department of Physics University of Basel Institute of Physics, Belgrade February 15. 2010 Collaborators:
More informationTHz experiments at the UCSB FELs and the THz Science and Technology Network.
THz experiments at the UCSB FELs and the THz Science and Technology Network. Mark Sherwin UCSB Physics Department and Institute for Quantum and Complex Dynamics UCSB Center for Terahertz Science and Technology
More informationDriving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian
Qubit Control Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian Hamiltonian for microwave drive Unitary transform with and Results in dispersive approximation up to 2 nd order in g Drive induces Rabi oscillations
More informationApplied Physics 150a: Homework #3
Applied Physics 150a: Homework #3 (Dated: November 13, 2014) Due: Thursday, November 20th, anytime before midnight. There will be an INBOX outside my office in Watson (Rm. 266/268). 1. (10 points) The
More informationSingle Spin Qubits, Qubit Gates and Qubit Transfer with Quantum Dots
International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi : Quantum Spintronics and Related Phenomena June 22-23, 2012 Varenna, Italy Single Spin Qubits, Qubit Gates and Qubit Transfer with Quantum Dots Seigo Tarucha
More informationShallow Donors in Silicon as Electron and Nuclear Spin Qubits Johan van Tol National High Magnetic Field Lab Florida State University
Shallow Donors in Silicon as Electron and Nuclear Spin Qubits Johan van Tol National High Magnetic Field Lab Florida State University Overview Electronics The end of Moore s law? Quantum computing Spin
More informationSupplementary Figure 1 Level structure of a doubly charged QDM (a) PL bias map acquired under 90 nw non-resonant excitation at 860 nm.
Supplementary Figure 1 Level structure of a doubly charged QDM (a) PL bias map acquired under 90 nw non-resonant excitation at 860 nm. Charging steps are labeled by the vertical dashed lines. Intensity
More informationSingle photon nonlinear optics in photonic crystals
Invited Paper Single photon nonlinear optics in photonic crystals Dirk Englund, Ilya Fushman, Andrei Faraon, and Jelena Vučković Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 ABSTRACT We
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 26 Jan 1999
Quantum computation with ions in thermal motion Anders Sørensen and Klaus Mølmer Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus DK-8 Århus C arxiv:quant-ph/9839v 6 Jan 999 We propose an implementation
More informationКвантовые цепи и кубиты
Квантовые цепи и кубиты Твердотельные наноструктуры и устройства для квантовых вычислений Лекция 2 А.В. Устинов Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany Russian Quantum Center, Russia Trapped ions Degree
More informationPhotonic Micro and Nanoresonators
Photonic Micro and Nanoresonators Hauptseminar Nanooptics and Nanophotonics IHFG Stuttgart Overview 2 I. Motivation II. Cavity properties and species III. Physics in coupled systems Cavity QED Strong and
More informationAnisotropic Spin Exchange in Pulsed Quantum Gates
Anisotropic Spin Exchange in Pulsed Quantum Gates N.E. Bonesteel and D. Stepanenko Department of Physics and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 3310 D.P.
More informationQUANTUM COMPUTING. Part II. Jean V. Bellissard. Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France
QUANTUM COMPUTING Part II Jean V. Bellissard Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France QUANTUM GATES: a reminder Quantum gates: 1-qubit gates x> U U x> U is unitary in M 2 ( C
More informationQuantum control of spin qubits in silicon
Quantum control of spin qubits in silicon Belita Koiller Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil II Quantum Information Workshop Paraty, 8-11 September 2009 Motivation B.E.Kane,
More informationOptically-controlled controlled quantum dot spins for quantum computers
Optically-controlled controlled quantum dot spins for quantum computers David Press Yamamoto Group Applied Physics Department Ph.D. Oral Examination April 28, 2010 1 What could a Quantum Computer do? Simulating
More informationPERTURBATION APPROACH FOR NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SOLID-STATE QUANTUM COMPUTATION
PERTURBATION APPROACH FOR NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SOLID-STATE QUANTUM COMPUTATION G. P. BERMAN, D. I. KAMENEV, AND V. I. TSIFRINOVICH Received October 001 and in revised form 11 July 00 A dynamics of
More informationQuantum Optics with Mesoscopic Systems II
Quantum Optics with Mesoscopic Systems II A. Imamoglu Quantum Photonics Group, Department of Physics ETH-Zürich Outline 1) Cavity-QED with a single quantum dot 2) Optical pumping of quantum dot spins 3)
More informationQuantum Computing with neutral atoms and artificial ions
Quantum Computing with neutral atoms and artificial ions NIST, Gaithersburg: Carl Williams Paul Julienne T. C. Quantum Optics Group, Innsbruck: Peter Zoller Andrew Daley Uwe Dorner Peter Fedichev Peter
More informationSupplementary Information for
Supplementary Information for Ultrafast Universal Quantum Control of a Quantum Dot Charge Qubit Using Landau-Zener-Stückelberg Interference Gang Cao, Hai-Ou Li, Tao Tu, Li Wang, Cheng Zhou, Ming Xiao,
More informationExperimental Realization of Shor s Quantum Factoring Algorithm
Experimental Realization of Shor s Quantum Factoring Algorithm M. Steffen1,2,3, L.M.K. Vandersypen1,2, G. Breyta1, C.S. Yannoni1, M. Sherwood1, I.L.Chuang1,3 1 IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
More informationLecture 8, April 12, 2017
Lecture 8, April 12, 2017 This week (part 2): Semiconductor quantum dots for QIP Introduction to QDs Single spins for qubits Initialization Read-Out Single qubit gates Book on basics: Thomas Ihn, Semiconductor
More informationElectrical Control of Single Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots Jason Petta Physics Department, Princeton University
Electrical Control of Single Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots Jason Petta Physics Department, Princeton University g Q 2 m T + S Mirror U 3 U 1 U 2 U 3 Mirror Detector See Hanson et al., Rev. Mod. Phys.
More informationSingle-photon nonlinearity of a semiconductor quantum dot in a cavity
Single-photon nonlinearity of a semiconductor quantum dot in a cavity D. Sanvitto, F. P. Laussy, F. Bello, D. M. Whittaker, A. M. Fox and M. S. Skolnick Department of Physics and Astronomy, University
More informationCMSC 33001: Novel Computing Architectures and Technologies. Lecture 06: Trapped Ion Quantum Computing. October 8, 2018
CMSC 33001: Novel Computing Architectures and Technologies Lecturer: Kevin Gui Scribe: Kevin Gui Lecture 06: Trapped Ion Quantum Computing October 8, 2018 1 Introduction Trapped ion is one of the physical
More informationphys4.20 Page 1 - the ac Josephson effect relates the voltage V across a Junction to the temporal change of the phase difference
Josephson Effect - the Josephson effect describes tunneling of Cooper pairs through a barrier - a Josephson junction is a contact between two superconductors separated from each other by a thin (< 2 nm)
More informationOptimal Controlled Phasegates for Trapped Neutral Atoms at the Quantum Speed Limit
with Ultracold Trapped Atoms at the Quantum Speed Limit Michael Goerz May 31, 2011 with Ultracold Trapped Atoms Prologue: with Ultracold Trapped Atoms Classical Computing: 4-Bit Full Adder Inside the CPU:
More informationNANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
. NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY V Two-Level Quantum Systems (Qubits) Lecture notes 5 5. Qubit description Quantum bit (qubit) is an elementary unit of a quantum computer. Similar to classical computers,
More informationEncoding a logical qubit into physical qubits
Encoding a logical qubit into physical qubits B. Zeng, 1, * D. L. Zhou, 2,3 Z. Xu, 1 C. P. Sun, 2 and L. You 2,3 1 Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, Peoples Republic of China
More informationCircuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing
Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing Himadri Barman Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research Bangalore, India. QCMJC Talk, July 10, 2012 Outline Basics of quantum
More informationScalable Quantum Computing With Enhancement Quantum Dots
Scalable Quantum Computing With Enhancement Quantum Dots Y. B. Lyanda-Geller a, M. J. Yang b and C. H. Yang c a Department of Physics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 b Naval Research Laboratory,
More informationQuantum computing with cavity QED
Quantum computing with cavity QED Ch. J. Schwarz Center for High Technology Materials, University of New Mexico, 1313 Goddard Street SE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 Physics & Astronomy, University of
More informationQuantum computation and quantum information
Quantum computation and quantum information Chapter 7 - Physical Realizations - Part 2 First: sign up for the lab! do hand-ins and project! Ch. 7 Physical Realizations Deviate from the book 2 lectures,
More informationControlling Spin Qubits in Quantum Dots. C. M. Marcus Harvard University
Controlling Spin Qubits in Quantum Dots C. M. Marcus Harvard University 1 Controlling Spin Qubits in Quantum Dots C. M. Marcus Harvard University GaAs Experiments: David Reilly (Univ. Sydney) Edward Laird
More information2.0 Basic Elements of a Quantum Information Processor. 2.1 Classical information processing The carrier of information
QSIT09.L03 Page 1 2.0 Basic Elements of a Quantum Information Processor 2.1 Classical information processing 2.1.1 The carrier of information - binary representation of information as bits (Binary digits).
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
doi:10.1038/nature12036 We provide in the following additional experimental data and details on our demonstration of an electrically pumped exciton-polariton laser by supplementing optical and electrical
More informationSupplementary Figure 1: Reflectivity under continuous wave excitation.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1 Supplementary Figure 1: Reflectivity under continuous wave excitation. Reflectivity spectra and relative fitting measured for a bias where the QD exciton transition is detuned from
More informationSpin Transport in III-V Semiconductor Structures
Spin Transport in III-V Semiconductor Structures Ki Wook Kim, A. A. Kiselev, and P. H. Song Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7911 We
More informationOptomechanically induced transparency of x-rays via optical control: Supplementary Information
Optomechanically induced transparency of x-rays via optical control: Supplementary Information Wen-Te Liao 1, and Adriana Pálffy 1 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg,
More informationQuantum Computation with Neutral Atoms
Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Marianna Safronova Department of Physics and Astronomy Why quantum information? Information is physical! Any processing of information is always performed by physical
More informationMagnetic semiconductors. (Dilute) Magnetic semiconductors
Magnetic semiconductors We saw last time that: We d like to do spintronics in semiconductors, because semiconductors have many nice properties (gateability, controllable spin-orbit effects, long spin lifetimes).
More informationQuantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots. slides courtesy of Lieven Vandersypen, TU Delft
Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots slides courtesy of Lieven Vandersypen, TU Delft Can we access the quantum world at the level of single-particles? in a solid state environment?
More informationQUANTUM THEORY OF LIGHT EECS 638/PHYS 542/AP609 FINAL EXAMINATION
Instructor: Professor S.C. Rand Date: April 5 001 Duration:.5 hours QUANTUM THEORY OF LIGHT EECS 638/PHYS 54/AP609 FINAL EXAMINATION PLEASE read over the entire examination before you start. DO ALL QUESTIONS
More informationElectromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT) via Spin Coherences in Semiconductor
Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT) via Spin Coherences in Semiconductor Hailin Wang Oregon Center for Optics, University of Oregon, USA Students: Shannon O Leary Susanta Sarkar Yumin Shen Phedon
More informationLogical error rate in the Pauli twirling approximation
Logical error rate in the Pauli twirling approximation Amara Katabarwa and Michael R. Geller Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA (Dated: April 10, 2015)
More informationS.K. Saikin May 22, Lecture 13
S.K. Saikin May, 007 13 Decoherence I Lecture 13 A physical qubit is never isolated from its environment completely. As a trivial example, as in the case of a solid state qubit implementation, the physical
More informationQuantum Simulation with Rydberg Atoms
Hendrik Weimer Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leibniz University Hannover Blaubeuren, 23 July 2014 Outline Dissipative quantum state engineering Rydberg atoms Mesoscopic Rydberg gates A Rydberg Quantum
More informationError Classification and Reduction in Solid State Qubits
Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Honors Theses University Honors Program 5-15 Error Classification and Reduction in Solid State Qubits Karthik R. Chinni Southern Illinois University Carbondale,
More informationElectrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits
1.0 10 0.8 01 switching probability 0.6 0.4 0.2 00 P. Bertet & R. Heeres SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group 11 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 swap duration (ns) Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting
More informationSpin-orbit coupling and time-reversal symmetry in quantum gates
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 68, 115306 2003 Spin-orbit coupling and time-reversal symmetry in quantum gates D. Stepanenko and N. E. Bonesteel Department of Physics and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida
More informationCircuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014
Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014 Introduction Theory details Strong coupling experiment Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical
More informationQuantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots slides courtesy of Lieven Vandersypen, TU Delft Can we access the quantum world at the level of single-particles? in a solid state environment?
More informationDipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator
Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator 200 µm J. Basset, D.-D. Jarausch, A. Stockklauser, T. Frey, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin and A. Wallraff Quantum
More informationGround state cooling via Sideband cooling. Fabian Flassig TUM June 26th, 2013
Ground state cooling via Sideband cooling Fabian Flassig TUM June 26th, 2013 Motivation Gain ultimate control over all relevant degrees of freedom Necessary for constant atomic transition frequencies Do
More informationQuantum computing and quantum communication with atoms. 1 Introduction. 2 Universal Quantum Simulator with Cold Atoms in Optical Lattices
Quantum computing and quantum communication with atoms L.-M. Duan 1,2, W. Dür 1,3, J.I. Cirac 1,3 D. Jaksch 1, G. Vidal 1,2, P. Zoller 1 1 Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020
More informationION TRAPS STATE OF THE ART QUANTUM GATES
ION TRAPS STATE OF THE ART QUANTUM GATES Silvio Marx & Tristan Petit ION TRAPS STATE OF THE ART QUANTUM GATES I. Fault-tolerant computing & the Mølmer- Sørensen gate with ion traps II. Quantum Toffoli
More informationOptical Control of Coherent Interactions between Electron Spins in InGaAs Quantum Dots
Optical Control of Coherent Interactions between Electron Spins in InGaAs Quantum Dots S. Spatzek, 1 A. Greilich, 1, * Sophia E. Economou, 2 S. Varwig, 1 A. Schwan, 1 D. R. Yakovlev, 1,3 D. Reuter, 4 A.
More informationSupplementary Information: Electrically Driven Single Electron Spin Resonance in a Slanting Zeeman Field
1 Supplementary Information: Electrically Driven Single Electron Spin Resonance in a Slanting Zeeman Field. Pioro-Ladrière, T. Obata, Y. Tokura, Y.-S. Shin, T. Kubo, K. Yoshida, T. Taniyama, S. Tarucha
More informationNondestructive Optical Measurements of a Single Electron Spin in a Quantum Dot
Nondestructive Optical Measurements of a Single Electron Spin in a Quantum Dot J. Berezovsky, M. H. Mikkelsen, O. Gywat, N. G. Stoltz, L. A. Coldren, D. D. Awschalom* Center for Spintronics and Quantum
More informationSupplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition
Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition Shi-Biao Zheng 1, You-Peng Zhong 2, Kai Xu 2, Qi-Jue Wang 2, H. Wang 2, Li-Tuo Shen 1, Chui-Ping
More informationNonlinear Optics and Quantum Entanglement of Ultra-Slow. Single Photons. Abstract
Nonlinear Optics and Quantum Entanglement of Ultra-Slow Single Photons M. D. Lukin 1 and A. Imamoğlu 2 arxiv:quant-ph/9910094v1 22 Oct 1999 1 ITAMP, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge,
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Supporting online material SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION doi: 0.038/nPHYS8 A: Derivation of the measured initial degree of circular polarization. Under steady state conditions, prior to the emission of the
More informationQuantum computer: basics, gates, algorithms
Quantum computer: basics, gates, algorithms single qubit gate various two qubit gates baby-steps shown so far with ion quantum processors and how to reach a scalable device in future Ulm, Germany: 40 Ca
More informationAn introduction to Quantum Computing using Trapped cold Ions
An introduction to Quantum Computing using Trapped cold Ions March 10, 011 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Qubits 3 Operations in Quantum Computing 3.1 Quantum Operators.........................................
More informationCurriculum Vitae- Jay Anil Gupta. Education PhD, Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
Curriculum Vitae- Jay Anil Gupta Ohio State University Department of Physics 191 W. Woodruff Ave Columbus, OH 43210 Phone: (614) 247-8457 Fax: (614) 292-7557 Email: jgupta@mps.ohio-state.edu Education
More informationTowards Quantum Computation with Trapped Ions
Towards Quantum Computation with Trapped Ions Ion traps for quantum computation Ion motion in linear traps Nonclassical states of motion, decoherence times Addressing individual ions Sideband cooling of
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 9 Oct 2006
Adiabatic Elimination in a Lambda System E. Brion, L.H. Pedersen, and K. Mølmer Lundbeck Foundation Theoretical Center for Quantum System Research, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus,
More informationLie algebraic aspects of quantum control in interacting spin-1/2 (qubit) chains
.. Lie algebraic aspects of quantum control in interacting spin-1/2 (qubit) chains Vladimir M. Stojanović Condensed Matter Theory Group HARVARD UNIVERSITY September 16, 2014 V. M. Stojanović (Harvard)
More informationTheory for strongly coupled quantum dot cavity quantum electrodynamics
Folie: 1 Theory for strongly coupled quantum dot cavity quantum electrodynamics Alexander Carmele OUTLINE Folie: 2 I: Introduction and Motivation 1.) Atom quantum optics and advantages of semiconductor
More informationA scheme for protecting one-qubit information against erasure. error. Abstract
A scheme for protecting one-qubit information against erasure error Chui-Ping Yang 1, Shih-I Chu 1, and Siyuan Han 1 Department of Chemistry, University of Kansas, and Kansas Center for Advanced Scientific
More informationIon trap quantum processor
Ion trap quantum processor Laser pulses manipulate individual ions row of qubits in a linear Paul trap forms a quantum register Effective ion-ion interaction induced by laser pulses that excite the ion`s
More informationSplitting of a Cooper pair by a pair of Majorana bound states
Chapter 7 Splitting of a Cooper pair by a pair of Majorana bound states 7.1 Introduction Majorana bound states are coherent superpositions of electron and hole excitations of zero energy, trapped in the
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 24 Mar 1995
Conditional Quantum Dynamics and Logic Gates Adriano Barenco, David Deutsch and Artur Ekert Clarendon Laboratory, Physics Department, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom Richard
More informationCharge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device
Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device Andreas V. Kuhlmann, 1 Julien Houel, 1 Arne Ludwig, 1, 2 Lukas Greuter, 1 Dirk Reuter, 2, 3 Andreas D. Wieck, 2 Martino Poggio, 1 and Richard
More informationWhat is a quantum computer?
What is a quantum computer? Lucas Paresqui Berruezo lucaspberruezo@gmail.com 3 de julho de 2015 1 Introduction Many people may have heard the words quantum computer, but only a few have actually seen one.
More informationOptical Manipulation of an Electron Spin in Quantum Dots
Optical Manipulation of an Electron Spin in Quantum Dots Al. L. Efros Naval Research Laoratory, Washington DC, USA Acknowledgements: DARPA/QuIST and ONR Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, UC Santa
More informationManipulation of single neutral atoms in optical lattices
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 74, 436 6 Manipulation of single neutral atoms in optical lattices Chuanwei Zhang, S. L. Rolston, and S. Das Sarma Condensed Matter Theory Center, Department of Physics, University of
More informationDifferential Phase Shift Quantum Key Distribution and Beyond
Differential Phase Shift Quantum Key Distribution and Beyond Yoshihisa Yamamoto E. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University National Institute of Informatics (Tokyo, Japan) DPS-QKD system Protocol System
More informationFermi polaron-polaritons in MoSe 2
Fermi polaron-polaritons in MoSe 2 Meinrad Sidler, Patrick Back, Ovidiu Cotlet, Ajit Srivastava, Thomas Fink, Martin Kroner, Eugene Demler, Atac Imamoglu Quantum impurity problem Nonperturbative interaction
More information