arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 23 Nov 2017

Transcription

1 he anomalous U anom symmetry and flavors from an SU5 SU5 GU in Z I orbifold compactification Jihn E. Kim Department of Physics, Kyung Hee University, Gyungheedaero, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 7, Republic of Korea, and Center for Axion and Precision Physics Research IBS, 9 Daehakro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea arxiv:7.55v [hep-ph] Nov 7 Bumseok Kyae Department of Physics, Pusan National University, Busandaehakro--Gil, Geumjeong-Gu, Busan, Republic of Korea Soonkeon Nam Department of Physics, Kyung Hee University, Gyungheedaero, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 7, Republic of Korea In string compactifications, frequently there appears the anomalous U gauge symmetry which belonged to E 8 E 8 of the heterotic string. his anomalous U gauge boson obtains mass at the compactification scale 8 GeV by absorbing one pseudoscalar corresponding to the modelindependent axion from the second rank anti-symmetric tensor field B MN. Below the compactification scale, there results a global symmetry U anom whose charge Q anom is the original gauge U charge. his is the most natural global symmetry, realizing the invisible axion. his global symmetry U anom is suitable for a flavor symmetry. In the simplest compactification model with the flipped SU5 grand unification, we calculate all the low energy parameters in terms of the vacuum expectation values of the standard model singlets. PACS numbers:.8.va,.5.ff,.5.mj,..fr. Keywords: Anomalous U global symmetry, Higgs doublets, Doublet-triplet splitting, Fermion mass matrices. I. INRODUCION Low energy global symmetries in the effective theory are of fundamental importance in the strong CP solutions [] and cosmology []. From the bottom-up approach, the Kim-Shifman-Vainstein-Zhakarov KSVZ axion model [, ] and the Dine-Fischer-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky DFSZ axion model [5, ] are of practical interests. However, these global symmetries might be badly broken by gravitational effects [9]. On the other hand, a consistent top-down approach, the so-called string models, is not allowing any global symmetry. In compactifications of the heterotic string [], there always exists the pseudoscalar degree from the second rank antisymmetric tensor field B µν µ,ν =,,, [], which is the so-called model-independent axion MI-axion []. If the MI-axion is physical, its decay constant is of order 5 GeV [] which is marked in Fig. of Ref. []. If this MI-axion degree is removed at the compactification scale, a global U symmetry can survive down to realize the invisible axions at the intermediate scale M int [ ]. his happens in compactifications with an anomalous U gauge symmetry [5]. he anomalous U gauge symmetry is a U subgroup of E 8 E 8 gauge group, and the corresponding gauge boson obtains mass at the compactification scale 8 GeV by absorbing the MI-axion degree. In this case, a global symmetry called U anom is surviving down to a lower energy scale. Note that the so-called model-dependent axions MD-axions from B MN M,N = 5,, [] do not match to any U subgroup of E 8 E 8 because the heterotic string has only one anomalous U gauge symmetry. Because there is no global symmetry except the U anom global symmetry, the MD-axions must be removed at the compactification scale unless they become accidentally light [7]. So, those used in Refs. [8] must be accidentally realized. In string compactification, accidental symmetries are pointed out to be related to axions [9, ] and R symmetry []. Here, we identify U anom as the needed Peccei-Quinn PQ symmetry [] for the invisible axion [ ]. his leads us to consider a reasonable compactification model with a U anom symmetry in a full detail. In this For the DFSZ model, only in the supersymmetric extension of the standard model the fine-tuning problem [7] is evaded by the µ term [8].

2 paper, we choose the model presented in Ref. [], based on Z I orbifold compactification. We could have chosen the model presented in Ref. [] also, which however contains much more singlets and hence is more complicated to be presented here completely. Even though we present the analyses in the specific model, the current method can be applied to any model toward obtaining a complete knowledge on the invisible axion and flavor parameters. helowenergygaugegroupobtainedin[]issu5 U X U SU5 SU wheretheprimednon-abelian groupsarefrom the hidden sector E 8. he first twofactorssu5 U X is the so-calledrank-5flipped-su5 [5 7]. Being a GU, the flipped-su5 must resolve the doublet-triplet splitting problem in the Higgs quintets 5 and 5: Why are the color triplets superheavy while Higgs doublets remain light? In this paper, we show how the splitting is realized in terms of the complete spectra in the model. In fact, we go beyond the dimensional analyses. he global symmetry U anom is beyond the flipped-su5 and hence it can be used as a family symmetry. Since we know all the quantum numbers Q anom of the global symmetry U anom, we can obtain the order of magnitudes of all the Yukawa couplings, resolving the family parameters, i.e. we can obtain mass matrices of the SM fermions. Basically, it turns out that the flavor matrices are given by the multiples of Yukawa coupling constants [] instead of the mass power suppressions via the Froggatt-Nielsen powers [8]. In Sec. II, we present the definition of quantum numbers and express Q anom in terms of six U gauge charges of E 8 E 8 and derive which pair of 5 and 5 are remaining toward the needed pair in the SUSY SM. Here, we also discuss the t Hooft mechanism which is working for transferring the global symmetry down to the axion window. In Sec. III, we discuss mass scales in the model where U anom is surviving as a PQ symmetry down to an intermediate scale. In Sec. IV, we present the Yukawa mass matrices of Q em = + and quarks, Q em = charged leptons, and light SM neutrinos. Section V is a conclusion. In Appendix, the t Hooft mechanism in the compactification process is discussed. For this occasion, we present correct entries for the previous ables of Ref. [9], taking into account its erratum. II. GLOBAL CHARGES AND ONE PAIR OF HIGGS DOUBLES IN SUSY In the open string theory with n Chan-Paton factors, string amplitudes are Un invariant for example. his Un, constructed with nfundamental nanti-fundamental is the world sheet global symmetry, viz. p.7 of Ref. []. Now in the target space, this is coordinate x M dependent and hence Un is promoted to a gauge symmetry, which is the reason that string theory does not allow any global symmetry. he basic reason might be the string movement in the world sheet. However, if location of the string is fixed at a fixed point, variation of the string in the world sheet is not allowed and hence in the target space global symmetry may not be promoted to a gauge symmetry. Fixed points are present in the symmetric orbifold compactifications, and the existence of a global symmetry is not ruled out. But, in the smooth compactifications there will be no global symmetry. hus, an anomalous U may not arise in smooth compactifications. o obtain a global symmetry producing an anomalous U and hence the invisible axion, let us consider the orbifold compactification. An E 8 E 8 heterotic string model compactified on Z I orbifold gives SU5 SU5 SU with seven U s []. his GU model has been studied for various aspects in Refs. [9,, ]. Extra U s are just a problem in orbifold compactification. In Calabi-Yau compactifications, for example, the rank due to extra U s is easily reduced. But there is one important U factor which is a part of the flipped SU5 GU [5]. Because of the difficulty of obtaining an adjoint representation for a Higgs multiplet for breaking SU5, the flipped SU5 is probably the most favorable GU in the orbifold compactification []. So, firstly we pay attention to the factor SU5 flip where our definition of SU5 flip is containing a gauge group U: SU5 U X. he second is the anomalous U. Except these two U factors, U X and U anom, the non-abelian gauge group is SU5 SU5 SU, and the rest anomaly free factors are Ũ5. Since the rank of the original gauge group E 8 E 8 is, the total number of U factors is 7. Let us name their charges as X and Q i i =,,. Q anom is a linear combination of Q i i =,,. In Ref. [9], these charges are defined on the lattice as, X =,,,, ; 8, Q anom = 8Q +7Q Q Q 5 9Q, Recently, a comparison of orbifold compactifications and free fermionic models has been studied []. he Pati-Salam model [] is also good, but to break the part SU L SU R, contained in the PS model, down to SU U, one needs a VEV of under SU R, hence it is like an adjoint of SU. Anyway, because of this complexity, we may say that the flipped SU5 is most favored from string compactification. For the definition, see, Ref. [, ].

3 where Q = 5 ;,, 8, Q = 5 ;,, 8, Q = 5 ;,, 8, Q = 8,;,,, Q 5 = 8,;,,, Q = 8,,,,8;,,. In the orbifold compactification, frequently there appears an anomalous U A gauge fields A µ from a subgroup of E 8 E 8 [5]. he charge of this anomalous U A is given in Eq.. In addition, the anomaly cancellation in dimensions D requires the so-called Green-Schwarz GS term in terms of the second rank antisymmetric-tensor fieldb MN M,N =,,,[]. hisgstermalwaysintroducesthemi-axiona MI, µ a MI ǫ µνρσ H νρσ µ,etc. =,,, where H νρσ is the field strength of B ρσ []. In this compactification with U A, A µ absorbs a MI to become massive at the compactification scale m A 8 GeV. 5 Below the scale m A, there remains a global symmetry which is called U anom, and its charge is given by Q anom presented in Eq.. In detail, it works as follows. Suppose that five Ũ charges out of Q,, are broken, and there is only one gauge symmetry remaining, which we identify as U anom. Now, we can consider two continuous parameters, one is the MI-axion direction and the other the phase of U anom transformation. Out of two continuous directions, only one phase or pseudoscalar is absorbed by the U anom gauge boson, and one continuous direction survives. he remaining continuous degree corresponds to a global symmetry, which is called the t Hooft mechanism [7]: If both a gauge symmetry and a global symmetry are broken by one scalar vacuum expectation value VEV, the gauge symmetry is broken and a global symmetry is surviving. he resulting global charge is a linear combination of the original gauge and global charges. We will briefly review this in Appendix. his counting of pseudoscalar degrees is not affected by changing the scales of the VEVs. So, when the anomalous U is arising at the compactification scale, the gauge symmetry U anom is broken and the MI-axion degree is removed, and in addition there results the global U anom symmetry below the compactification scale. he dilaton the partner of the MI-axion must remain heavy as in the usual Higgs mechanism because it does not find its partner below the compactification scale. A. No gauged anomalous U below the compactification scale here have been many discussions on the Fayet-Iliopoulos FI D-term for U anom gauge symmetry at the GU scale, e.g. in Ref. [8]. However, there is no gauged U corresponding to the anomalous symmetry below the compactification scale. In models with a hierarchy between the compactification scale and the GU scale, so there is no need to consider the U anom D-term, d θξd, below the compactification scale. he ξ term is in the D term potential, D, with D = ξ eφ Q a φ where e is the U anom gauge coupling. Our U anom is derived from the orbifold compactification of the E 8 E 8 heterotic string. After compactification of the six internal space, one can consider M K where M is the Minkowski space and K is the internal space. In Fig., we show some relevant fields living in K. he effective symmetry group in the M Lagrangian is gauge symmetries times some discrete groups without any global symmetry except that corresponding to B µν. he D scalar B ij are called the MD-axions, a n n, determined by the topology of the internal space. Reference [8] shows that the classical symmetries corresponding to a n a n +constant are broken by the world-sheet instanton effects. Fig. a shows these fields living in K with some U gauge fields. In the compactification of E 8 E 8 heterotic string, there appears only one anomalous U if any such terms are present. If so, the corresponding gauge boson obtains mass by absorbing a MI as shown in Appendix and Fig. b. All the other U s are anomaly free. a n are not absorbed to gauge bosons at this stage. So, we can consider the massless states a n and non-anomalous six U s below the compactification scale, and their Kähler potentials and FI D terms. However, for U anom we need not consider the corresponding D term. For a consistency check, consider Fig. a again. If the throat is not cut, the space is still D. In this D, we can consider the U anom subgroup of E 8 E 8. Let us consider the subgroup SU C SU L U Y U anom 5 i=ũ i of E 8 E 8 where Ũ i are anomaly free. Before cutting the throat, 5 If there is no anomalous U gauge symmetry, the MI axion is an axion at m MI GeV [].

4 µ a n, H νρσ A µ H νρσ A µ l a L b L FIG. : Compactification, leading to M K. he parallelogram depicts M, l is a compactification size of K, and L in one direction is shown pictorially as a neck. let us breake 8 E 8 to separateout U anom bythe VEVofanappropriateadjoint representationin Dlanguagein the bulk. Of course, this adjoint representation is not present in our massless spectra but good enough to see the resulting effective low energy theory. If U anom is separated out in this way, it obtains mass by absorbing the MI axion by the VEVs of F ij as shown in Appendix. hen, assign superheavy masses to the adjoint representation we introduced. Sofar, nothinghasbeenintroducedviolatingthe effectivesymmetrysu C SU L U Y U anom 5 i=ũ i. Next, cut the throat to obtain the effective D theory which is SU C SU L U Y 5 i=ũ i. here cannot be a FI D term for U anom in this interpretation. Even if we consider the FI term with a non-vanishing ξ, in case there is no hierarchy between the compactification scale and the GU scale,[9] we can show that a global symmetry can be derived below the scale of the anomalous gauge boson mass. For this, let us consider Eq. plus the D term with a non-vanishing ξ, [ ] µ a MI µ a MI +M MI A µ µ a MI + ξ +e φ aq a φ a + µ iea µ φ + a = M MI µ a MI ev µ a A µ +, where φ a are assumed to carry only the anomalous charge for a moment, not carrying any non-anomalous charge Y and Q i i =,,5. Let one φ a, say φ develops a VEV, V, by minimizing the FI term. Here, two phase fields, a MI and a [= the phase of φ = V +ρ e ia/v / ] are considered and only one Goldstone boson is absorbed to A µ, M MI +e V cosθ Ga MI sinθ G a where tanθ G = ev /M MI. he orthogonal direction θ a MI = cosθ G M MI +sinθ a G ev 5 is surviving as a global direction below the scale MMI +e V. With this global symmetry, we can consider breaking the five non-anomalous Ũ s around the GU scale, leaving only one global symmetry to the axion window. If one gauge symmetry U anom were the whole story for the global symmetry, the next lower scale VEV of a scalar carrying non-zero VEV probably at a GU scale will break the global U anom. In the orbifold compactification, however, there appear many gauge U s six in our example which are anomaly free except the above U anom, say U in our example. Now, the D term of U is φ Q φ. Generally, φ carries the U anom charge, for example in able II any φ carrying non-zero Q also carries Q anom. So, the VEV of φ will break both U and the global U anom obtained above. Below φ, there appears the global symmetry U anom. So, applying the t Hooft mechanism repeatedly until all anomaly free gauge U s are broken except U Y, we obtain the global

5 U anom interpretable as U PQ from string compactification. hen, at the intermediate scale 9 GeV, one U anom breaking VEV f a of a SM singlet scalar Φ breaks the global symmetry U anom spontaneously and there results the needed invisible axion at the intermediate scale. he global symmetry whose shift angle θ is broken at an intermediate scale to create the invisible axion by some scalar field carrying the anomalous charge. o observe this, only one scalar field φ develops a VEV V as before. Now let us define a global charge surviving below the scale M MI +e V as7 ˆQ = Q anom +xq a where Q a is an anomaly free gauge U charge. he condition ˆQ φ = so that ˆQ is a good generator of the global symmetry, we fix x = Q anom φ /Q a φ. Since Q a is an anomaly-free generator, we can add a constant multiple of Q a in Eq. to give the same anomaly coefficient for U SU c SU c. So, we can take a new global charge as ˆQ = Q anom. 7 Actually, a more general proof was given in Ref. []. Consider ˆQ = Q anom + x Q a +x Q b where Q a and Q b are anomaly-free gauge charges. hen, r ˆQ = Q anom and r ˆQ Q p Q q = Q anom Q p Q q where {p,q} = {a,b}. In fact, in Ref. [], instead of Q anom of Eq., we have shown exactly the same traces with ˆQ = 5 ;,8, 8 5 ;,,. 8 In the ables of the present paper Q anom is used, and in the ables of [] ˆQ is used, but the anomaly-related quantities such as r ˆQ Q α color Qβ color and r ˆQ Q em Q em are exactly the same in both cases. 5 B. Invisible axion in the axion window For simplicity, assume a hierarchy between the compactification and the GU scales. Let us choose φ, not carrying any gauge charge. he VEV of φ is assumed to be at the axion window and breaks the U anom global symmetry. In this case, the actual global symmetry breaking scale is a mixture of two effects: the MI-axion direction and the hypothetical intermediate scale axion direction the phase of φ. Let the original anomalous gauge charge of φ be Q a, φ ve ia φ/v. hen, the QCD axion a created at the intermediate scale determined by the VEV of φ is a combination of a φ and a MI, a = cosθa φ +sinθa MI, with sinθ = gq a v M MI +g Q a v 9 where the antisymmetric tensor field strength is the MI-axion, H µνρ = M MI ǫ µνρσ σ a MI []. hus, for v M MI we obtain the desired invisible axion at the intermediate scale. Here, we stress again that the exact global symmetries from string compactification require anomalous gauge symmetries after compactification. From the E 8 E 8 heterotic string there is only one such anomalous gauge symmetry we discussed above. 8 Any other global symmetries must be accidental as discussed for QCD axions in [9, ] and for axion-like particles in []. C. hree families in the flipped SU5 We require that there result the three families of the minimal supersymmetric standard model MSSM and one pair of Higgs doublets. o have the invisible axion, we further require that U anom is broken at the intermediate It is easy to see this by counting the number of continuous degrees. We introduced two phases, a MI and a. One combination is absorbed to A µ anom. One may worry that the other combination, 5, might become massive because we considered two terms for a MI and a. But, it does not work that way because both generators, U anom and Q a in the FI D-term in Eq., are proportional. Eq. explicitly shows that only one combination is removed to A µ anom. 7 he sign in front of Q anom belongs to the sign convention of the θ term and we choose + sign here. 8 here can be more anomalous gauge symmetries from ype-i and ype II-B [].

6 Sect. Colored states SU5 X Mult. Q Q Q Q Q 5 Q Qanom Label Q γγ a U U ; C 7 + ; C 9 + ; C ; 78- C 75 ; C 5 +8 ; C +8 ; 5 ; ; 5 + ; ; 5 ; + ; 5 ; ; 5 ; + + ; 5 ; C C C C C C ABLE I: he SU5 U X states. Here, + represents helicity + and represents helicity. Sum of Qanom is multiplied by the index of the fundamental representation of SU c,. he PQ symmetry, being chiral, counts quark and antiquark in the same way. he right-handed states in and 5 are converted to the left-handed ones of 9 and 7, respectively. he bold entries are Q anom/. scale, M int GeV. At the SU5 flip GU level, we need three copies of In able I, we present SU5 non-singlet fields with the global quantum numbers where the axion-photon-photon couplings are presented in the last column. One family appears in the untwisted sector U, and two families appear in the twisted sector. In the SU5 flip GU, one needs a pair + for breaking the rank 5 group SU5 flip down to the rank group SU C SU L U Y. Indeed, they appear in and 9 in able I. Also, the vacuum expectation values VEVs of these pairs achieve the doublet-triplet splitting discussed in Subsec. IV A. For Higgs quintets, has the pairs with multiplicity. More importantly, two pairs appear in, and one pair appears in 7. wo pairs appearing in are not distinguished, and the Higgsino mass matrix elements are democratic. heir Yukawa couplings take the form C 5 C σ, which conserves the U anom symmetry, M demo = M M M M where M σ. he σ multiplicity is, as shown in able II. he twisted sector satisfies Z orbifold selection rules and the multiplicity belonging to the permutation symmetry S splits into S representations. hree σ s under S in the Z compactification can be combined to [, ] Φ = σ a +σ b +σc, Φ + = σ a +ωσ b + ωσc, Φ = σ a + ωσ b +ωσ c, where ω = e πi/ and ω = e πi/ are the cube roots of unity. Φ is a singlet and Φ + and Φ form a doublet. Suppose that Φ and Φ + = Φ =. C 5 and C belong to of S, and their multiplication gives =, Ψ = C 5 C +C 5 C, Ψ = C 5 C C 5 C, Ψ + = C 5 C +ωc 5 C, Ψ = C 5 C + ωc 5 C,

7 where Ψ + and Ψ form a doublet under interchange. hus, the singlet VEV Φ can couple either Ψ or Ψ. In this way, one pair becomes superheavy. his result is equivalent to the democratic mass matrix. Namely, determinant of M demo is, and only one pair obtains mass M. he remaining pair is massless at this stage. For the three pairs in, the Higgsino mass matrix can be studied in the same way. Since it belongs to, we consider Z and S permutation which allow only the following singlet combinations, Ψ a = C 7 C 8 +C 7 C 8 +C 7 C 8, Ψ b = C 7 C 8 C 7 C 8 +C 7 C 8, Ψ c = C 7 C 8 +C 7 C 8 C 7 C 8, Ψ d = C 7 C 8 C 7 C 8 C 7 C 8. If we require the invariance of the mass matrix under S, i.e. under the interchange of any two pairs out of, and, only the term Ψ a is allowed. hen, only one pair obtains superheavy mass and two pairs remain light. Again it is like taking a democratic mass matrix. Even if two pairs from remain light, their contribution to the unification point of couplings is null because they are the SU5 flip complete multiplets. However, the absolute magnitude of the gauge coupling constant at the unification point is affected. Nevertheless we will not discuss these complete multiplets any more in this paper since the massless pairs do not affect our discussion on the flavor problems. here are Yukawa couplings C 5 C σ and C C σ, which conserves the U anom symmetry. So, among the remaining two light pairs one from and the other from 7, one obtains mass, and finally there will be left with only one light pair. he Higgsino mass matrix is, 9 7 M Higgsino = H u H u H u 7 M M m M M m m m H d H d H 7 d where m σ. As expected, determinant of M Higgsino is, and there remain two light pairs as far as the element is. he heaviest eigenstate of is where Ψ is H u,d. he Higgsino pair of the MSSM contains he other state with a nonzero element will be presented later. Ψ Mc = Ψ +Ψ, mass = M, 5 Ψ = Ψ Ψ, mass =. III. MASS SCALES Below the Planck scale M P, we consider four scales, the compactification scale allowing large masses M vec to vectorlike pairs, the GU scale M GU, the intermediate M int, and the electroweak scale v ew. he principle of removing vector-like pairs is just the gauge principle as emphasized in []. If extra symmetries are introduced, one must include another assumptions how those extra symmetries are broken. he hierarchy of scales that we consider is E 8 E 8 GU SM and invisible axion SU c U em M vec M GU M int v ew 9 In the position, ε will be introduced later.

8 8 sectors Neutral singlet states SU5 X N L j Pf Q Q Q Q Q 5 Q Qanom La. 5 ; σ 5 ; 8,,,, σ 5 ; 8,,,, σ 5 ; 8,,,, σ 5 ; σ 5 5 ; σ 5 ; 5 7- σ 7 5 ; σ 8 5 ; 5,, 75- σ 9 5 ; 5,, σ 5 ; σ 5 ; σ 5 ; σ 5 ; 5,, σ 9 5 ; σ ; σ 9 5 ; σ ; 5,, σ 8 5 ; σ 9 5 ; σ 5 ; 5 {, } σ {, } ; 5 5 ; 5 5 ; σ σ σ ABLEII:Left-handedSU5 U X SU5 SU singletstates. N L j is thenotationforoscillator modeoftheoscillating string with j denoting the coordinate in the internal space, and Pf,+, is the multiplicity of the corresponding spectrum in the twisted sector,+,. In this table, there is only Pf. he right-handed states in and 5 are converted to the left-handed ones of 9 and 7, respectively. where M vec is the order of the string tension, α. he particles removed at the compactification scale are the vector-like sets. In able III, we list charged singlets. he vector-like sets, including the charges Q anom and Z orbifolds, must be removed at M vec. he U s which can be broken at the GU scales are five anomaly free Ũ s. U anom global symmetry is required to be broken at the axion window and works as a global symmetry at the GU scale. Any singlet of able III can have a GU scale VEV, leaving a global symmetry below M GU via the t Hooft mechanism [7]. We can repeat this process for breaking all five anomaly free Ũ s, leaving only U anom global symmetry below M GU. So, the doublet-triplet splitting can be of the form colored particles=gu scale and H u,d =light. Even if the masses of colored particles are a bit smaller than M GU, proton stability can be achieved. Proton decay by dimension operators of quarks and leptons by the exchange of colored scalars is helped by the Yukawa couplings for the first family membersby the order 5.5. hen, it is not problematic. With SUSY assumption, dimension 5 operators of quark and lepton superfields, W 5 +, is the leading contribution. his is disastrously dangerous if the colored scalar masses are somewhat smaller than M GU. here can arise a Z from a subgroup of an anomaly free Ũ gauge group, eliminating W as shown in [] and there is no fast proton decay problem []. here are two GU scale sets, C 7 +C 8, C +C9. 7 hese are SU5 U X non-singlets and these vector-like sets cannot be external light fields. In addition, the superpotential terms cannot be generated through the intermediate states of these vector-like fields. Diagrams with these internal M GU mass states must contain loops, which cannot generate superpotential terms because of the non-renomalization theorem. So, high dimension superpotential terms composed of light fields cannot be generated with a suppression factor M GU or M vec in our model. If a high dimension superpotential term of light fields is generated, the relevant mass suppression factor must be the intermediate scale M int. his conclusion, depending on our detailed model, is very different from the general

9 9 Sect. Charged singlet states SU5 X Mu. Q Q Q Q Q 5 Q Qanom La. Q γγ a U ; S ; S ; ; 5/ S 7 5 ; ; 5/ S ; ; + 5/ S 5 ; ; + 5/ S ; ; / S 7 5 ; ; 5/ S ; ; 5/ S 8 5 ; ; / S ; ; 5/ S 5 ; ; 5/ S ; ; / S 5 ; ; 5/ S + 5 ; ; 5/ S 5 ; ; 5 / S ; ; 5 5/ S 5 ; ; 5 5/ S ; ; 5 / S ; ; 5 5/ S ; ; 5 5/ S 5 ;, ; / S 58 5 ; ; 5/ S 8 5 ; ; 5/ S ABLE III: Electromagnetically charged singlets. strategy in the MSSM where the µ term for example has the suppression factor M GU or M P [8]. IV. YUKAWA COUPLINGS Now, we search for a possibility for a non-zero element of M Higgsino in Eq., which respects the U anom symmetry and Z I selection rules. At dimension level, there appears one, W Mint 7 H 7 u H 7 d σ σ 7 σ 7 σ 7 σ 8 σ 8 σ 8 σ 8 where weused M int asthe suppressionfactor. his term introduces anonzeroentry ε in the element which cannot be very small because the VEVs of singlets are also at the scale M int. In this case, the remaining two eigenstates of are N M m + ε m + M m ε m, mass = M + ε m + M ε 9 and the massless one is still Eq., 5,5 =, mass =.

10 Sect. P + kv SU5 X Mult. Q Q Q Q Q 5 Q Qanom Label ; ; ; C v C v 5 ; +, +, C v ABLE IV: hree left-handed states belonging to the vector-like spectra appearing in Fig.. At this level, the Higgs doublets are those appearing in. However, the doublets from obtain mass at the electroweak scale when soft masses of order m / are introduced, which is a well-known fact in the supergravity phenomenology, which will not be discussed here. A. Doublet-triplet splitting For the successful MSSM, the multiplet must be split into heavy colored ones and light Higgs doublets. his doublet-triplet splitting problem is achieved by the VEVs of and + appearing in and 9. Here, we show it explicitly from a detailed string compactification model discussed above. Here we show that the suppression factor is the mass of vector-like pair M vec. he VEVs of and + give mass to the colored triplets of the Higgs quintets, and 5 +. But the problem is the scale for the effective operator. We find the following operators, 5 VEV of : VEV of : C M vec M σ σ C C d from d c from5 +, int C 9 M vec M σ 9 σ C9 C 5 d c from + d from5, int where /M vec suppression is because there appear heavy vector-like states in the tree diagram. wo thick lines of Fig. are some vector-like states of Ref. [] because there is no massless left-handed states in 8 and 5. he cross in the RHS is of order M int because is present in able II. On the other hand, the cross in the LHS is expected of order M vec because 7 does not appear in able II. Even though the left-handed states of able II do not contain a state with Q anom = 7, the vector-like pairs and shown as two thick arrows can fulfill the quantum numbers because we will not require the masslessness conditions in the orbifold selection rules for the vector-like states. Also, the thick arrow line for 5 + does not appear in able II. Here, these three states are denoted as vector-like states which are shown in able IV. he left-mover and right-mover masses in the heterotic string with Z I compactification in the k th twisted sector are given by, M L = P +kv c k + ÑL, M R = s+kφ c k + ÑR, where ÑL,R are the oscillator numbers and c,8 = and c,8 = are given in Ref. []. In the model of [], the L and R vectors are V = 5 ;,, 5 ; +, +,, 5 φ = 5,,. he QCD-color field in 5 + finds the partner in, both of which are shown in reds in Fig.. Similarly, 5 finds the partner in +. hus, there remain only massless Higgs doublets from Eq., H u and H d, and the doublet-triplet splitting is realized. One pair of 5 and 5 + needs one pair of + and for the splitting. Loop diagrams are not considered because of the non-renormalization theorem.

11 FIG. : A high dimensional term. he fractional numbers in the brackets are Q anom/ ; 5 ; P + kv SU5 Mu. Q Q Q Q Q 5 Q Qanom La. Q γγ a ; ; 5 ; 5 ; ; 5 ; ; 5 ; ; 5 ; ; 5 5 ; ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 5/ 5 ; ; 7 5 ; ; 5 5/ 5 ; ; 5 ; ; 5 5/ 5 ; ; 5 ; 5 ; 5 5/ 5 ; ; 7 ; 5, F F F F F F ABLE V: he SU5 representations. Notations are the same as in able I. In view of the longevity of proton, note that the dangerous H 5 and H 5 5 couplings are allowed in SU5 U X, judging from the gauge quantum numbers alone. In the ordinary SO which is the covering group of SU5 U X, these terms are forbidden by imposing the R-parity quantum numbers and +, respectively, for the matter and Higgs fields. In our case, the GU scale Higgs boson H and H are C and C of able I. hese are from and 9. he orbifold selection rules allow the superpotential term C C but does not allow C C C C and C C C from the fields in able. In the latter operator containing the L-violating LLE c, may be chosen from such as σ 9,, of able II. But, LLE c alone does not trigger proton decay. Basically, the R-parity interpretation for the proton longevity in SO GU, up to dimension 5 operators, is automatic from our orbifold selection rules [] in case of the SU5 U X. But, a complete study on the proton longevity is outside the scope of this paper. B. he CKM and PMNS matrices here already exists an early attempt to obtain a CKM matrix from standard-like models implied by a Z Z fermionic construction [5]. Here, we attempt to obtain CKM and PMNS matrices based on the model of Ref. []. As commented before, if a high dimension superpotential term of light fields is generated then the relevant mass suppression factor must be the intermediate scale M int. Suppose we have an effective operator for the Q em =

12 Sect. P + kv SU Mult. Q Q Q Q Q 5 Q Qanom Label Q γγ a 5 ; ; 5, D In ; 5 ; 5 ; ; ; ; 5/ 5 ; ; 5/ 5 ; ; 5/ 5 ; ; 5/ 5 ; ; 5/ 5 ; ; 5/ 5 ; ; 5/ 5 ; ; 7 5/ 5 ; 5 ; ; 7 5/ ; 5 5/ a. V D D D D D D D D D D D i = 78 ABLE VI: he SU representations. Notations are the same as in able I. We listed only the upper component of SU from which the lower component can be obtained by applying of SU. quarks, M nsm singlets of able II In ables V and VI, we list all the particles which transform non-trivially under SU5 SU. here is no vector-like pair including Q anom charges. hus, there is no tree diagram of intermediate state with mass M vec, and any operator with sub-gu scale fields must have mass suppression parameter M int. hus, the suppression mass in Eq. 7 must be M int. With this in mind, let us discuss the Yukawa matrices and the fermion masses. he Q em = + quark mass matrix, consistent with U anom symmetry, the orbifold selection rules and the the multiplicity conditions of the Higgs doublets and matter fermions in, is M u U A S 5 U 5 A 5 S σ σ α,, σ M int M int,, v u, with H u = v u. 8 α σ M int,, where superscripts S and A in denote the symmetric and antisymmetric combinations of the multiplicity fields, and α and α are coupling parameters. Similarly, the Q em = quark mass matrix is given by M d U A S U A S σ β,, σ Mint M int,, v d, with H d = v d, 9 β σ M int,, where β is a coupling parameter. In able III, we listed charged singlets which will be needed for the charged lepton Yukawa couplings. Here, 5

13 in U and are Q em = + charged leptons. hus, Q em = charged lepton mass matrix is M e U 5 A 5 S 5 5 U 5 A 5 S σ σ γ,, σ M int M int,, v d. γ σ M int,, Similarly, we can write the neutrino mass matrix, M ν 5 U + 5 A + 5 S + 5 U + 5 A + 5 S + σ σ σσ, Mint 5,,, {σ σ,σσ5σ9}, Mint {σ σ,σσ5σ9} Mint σ σ Mint 5 σ σ, Mint 5 v u M int. he effective interaction for M ν based on SU C SU L U Y U anom introduces two H u insertions. Note that u-type quarks obtain mass from the coupling Hu where 5 Hu is 5 in the flipped SU5, and hence neutrino mass matrix comes from the square of this which introduces v u. he coefficient of v u can be /suppression mass = M GU /suppression mass which we take as /M int. In addition, there are nonzero factors of σ /M int or σ5 /M 5 int. For an illustration, take σ/m int =..5 and the largest neutrino mass m νmax =.5 ev. hen, M int 8 GeV. Obtaining M int from the first principle is beyond the scope of this paper. Inspecting the mass matrices, we conclude that a physical phase in σ leads to the CKM and PMNS phases. For example, there can be a phase generated by the following superpotential W = mσ σ 8 + M σ σ 7 σ σ where m and M are real parameters, and all fields develop nonvanishing VEVs. hen, σ = ±i σ 8 mm σ σ 7 / e iδ8 δ δ7/ where δ i are the phases of σ i. If δ 8 = δ = δ 7 =, the CKM and PMNS phases are determined as ± π. he form of mass matrices in Eqs. 8,9,, and can describe the quark and lepton masses successfully by various ratios of the singlet VEVs. Here, however, we will not try to find the relevant ratios. C. he axion-photon-photon coupling Because we know all the Q anom charges of the electromagnetically charged fermions, we can calculate the axionphoton-photon coupling c aγγ. In ables V and VI, the typos in the previous tables [9] are corrected. Summing the Q γγ a columns of ables I, III, V, and VI, we obtain c aγγ 9 9 =, which must be the case if U anom is the PQ symmetry []. he subtraction of, for m u /m d.5, is due to the contribution from the condensation of light quarks. he phases of other singlets can be rotated away by redefining the phases of some fermions.

14 V. CONCLUSION We use the only allowed global symmetry U anom from the heterotic string to find out the flavor structure of the SM. his global symmetry is the most natural choice for the invisible axion from string theory. In addition, U anom is describing a flavor symmetry. In the flipped SU5 grand unification of Ref. [], we calculate mass matrices of quarks and leptons. It turns out that the fermion mass hierarchy in the SM results from the number of powers of Yukawa couplings, which is a common case in string compactification. Also, it is shown how the doublettriplet splitting in the flipped SU5 GU is realized in the model. Acknowledgments J.E.K. thanks J. Ashfaque and P.K.S. Vaudrevange for pointing out typos in Ref. [9]. J.E.K. is supported in part by the National Research Foundation NRF grant funded by the Korean Government MES NRF-5RDAA589 and the IBS IBS-R7-D--a, and B.K. is supported in part by the NRF- RDAB95. Appendix: On the t Hooft mechanism Superstring axions arising from the mother gauge symmetry E 8 E 8 have been considered very early [5]. But, the case has been realized in [ 8] with the anomalous U [5] after the orbifold compactification is known, which is possible even from the mother gauge symmetry SO because the anomalous U may arise from the spectra in the twisted sectors. Basically, Barr excluded SO from the untwisted sector spectra [5]. In all these cases, the working principle is the t Hooft mechanism with the anomalous gauge U from compactification where the U is a subgroup of E 8 E 8 or SO. In this string compactification, the Green-Schwarz GS counter term [] is essential. he conventional t Hooft mechanism in gauge theories [7] is the following. Out of two continuous transformation parameters αx and β, acting on the field φ, φ e iαxqgauge e iβq global φ, 5 the α direction becomes the longitudinal mode of heavy gauge boson. he above transformation can be rewritten as φ e iαx+βqgauge e iβq global Q gauge φ. Redefining the local direction as α x = αx+β, we obtain the transformation φ e iα xq gauge e iβq global Q gauge φ. 7 So, the charge Q global Q gauge is reinterpreted as the new global charge and is not broken by the VEV, φ. Basically the direction β remains as the unbroken continuous direction. Consider the MI axion kinetic energy term in D [], which is parametrized after compactification to D as κ g ϕ H MNPH MNP, with M,N,P = {,,,} 8!MMI H µνρ H µνρ, with µ,ν,ρ = {,,,}. 9 he GS action in the differential form is [] S c {B [ = tr F +tr F tr F tr F ] + } 8 where tr and tr are for the E 8 and E 8 representations, which is relevant for our model discussed in the paper. In D, it leads to an interaction S c { Hµνρ A σ ǫ µνρσ ǫ ijklmn F ij F kl F mn + } 8! ǫ µνρσh µνρ A σ

15 5 FIG. : he flux F ij at a fixed point. where we have taken VEVs of internal gauge field strengths, F ij etc. Superstring carries the electric field A µ, whose group space value is simply denoted as A, a kind of matrix. First, let us note how we assign VEVs to field strengths in Eq.. hen, we discuss the t Hooft mechanism. he line integral around a fixed point gives an integer. But, in the orbifold compactification, we need to line-integrate only a part of π. In Fig., we showed the limegreen fundamental domain of Z. he line integral is for matrix value gauge field A µ which is in our case denoted by the shift vector and Wilson lines, V,V ±a i in the ij internal plane. By Stoke s theorem, it is of the surface integral of F ij which is assumed to be located at the fixed point F ij δ σ σ where σ is the location of the fixed point in the two-torus. his delta function limit of zero-length string must be considered for the string tension contribution to be neglected. In this way, we assign VEVs to field strengths in Eq.. We note that one scalar degree H µνρ is the MI-axion [] H µνρ = M MI ǫ µνρσ σ a MI. In Fig. a, we show the first term of Eq., transferring one derivative of F µν to B ρσ. Eqs. 9 and give the following µ a MI µ a MI +M MI A µ µ a MI. he global direction with respect to the t Hooft mechanism is the a MI direction. Eq. can be expressed as, by adding the contribution of Fig. b [which is obtained from Fig. a], µa MI +M MI A µ µ a MI + M MI A µa µ M MI A µ + M MI µ a MI. hus, the MI-axion degree is completely removed below the gauge boson mass scale where the heavy anomalous gauge boson including the longitudinal degree is defined as õ = A µ +/M MI µ a MI. he MI-axion is dynamicaly removed from the theory except that it couples to the anomaly [9]. his coupling is defining a θ parameter at low energy depending on some cosmologicaldetermination of a MI. he resulting global symmetry is broken by the usual Higgs mechanism and we expected that it is achieved at the intermediate scale. Now, let us denote the charge of U a subgroup of E 8 E 8 as Q a, which was anomalous in the beginning. Suppose that φ carries nonzero gauge charge Q a. All terms involving φ should respect the original U a gauge symmetry. So, the potential V is a function of φ φ only. Below M MI, we do not consider the FI term because there is no U a gauge symmetry. But, to discuss the scales of the U anom breaking, we consider the φ couplings together with the a MI degree. he φ coupling to A µ is given by, for φ = v+ρ e iaφ/v, D µ φ = µ igq a A µ φ ρ= = µa φ gq a A µ µ a φ + g Q av A µ = g Q av A µ gq a v µ a φ. 5

16 FIG. : he GS terms. he gauge boson A µ obtains mass from two contributions, Eqs. and 5, which can be written as M MI +g Q av A µ +A µ M MI µ a MI gq a v µ a φ + [ µ a MI + µ a φ ] 9 Let us define a new global degree as a interpretable as the invisible axion, a = cosθa φ +sinθa MI 7 where sinθ = gq a v M MI +g Q av. 8 hus, if v M MI, the global symmetry breaking scale can be at the intermediate scale and the axion has the dominant component from the phase of φ. Determination of v in the effective field theory framework is such that the coefficient of φ φ in the potential is given by intermediate scale. [] R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys.Rev.Lett. 8, 977. [doi:./physrevlett.8.]. [] J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B, [doi:./ ]; L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B, 98 [doi:./ x]; M. Dine and W. Fischler, he not so harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B, 7 98 [doi:./ ]. [] J. E. Kim, Weak interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett., 979 [doi:./phys- RevLett..]. [] M. A. Shifman, V. I. Vainstein, V. I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B, 9 98 [doi:./ ]. [5] M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion, Phys.Lett.B, [doi:./ ]. [] A. P. Zhitnitsky, On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 98. [7] H.K. Dreiner, F. Staub, and L. Ubaldi, From the unification scale to the weak scale: A self con- sistent supersymmetric Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky axion model, Phys. Rev. D 9, 55 [arxiv:.5977 [hep-ph]]. [8] J.E. Kim and H.P. Nilles, he µ problem and the strong CP problem, Phys.Lett.B 8, 5 98 [doi:./ ]. [9] S. M. Barr and D. Seckel, Planck-scale corrections to axion models, Phys. Rev. D, [doi:./phys- RevD..59]; M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russel, Planck-scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 8, 7 99 [arxiv: hep-th/9]; R. Holman, S.D.H. Hsu,.W. Kephart, R.W. Kolb, R. Watkins, and L.M. Widrow, Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity, Phys. Lett. B 8, 99 [arxiv: hep-ph/9].

17 [] D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec, and R. Rohm, he heterotic string, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 5 98 [doi:./physrevlett.5.5]. [] M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric D= gauge theory and superstring theory, Phys. Lett. B 9, 7 98 [doi:./ x]. [] E. Witten, Some properties of O superstrings, Phys. Lett. B 9, 5 98 [doi:./7-989-]. [] K. Choi and J.E. Kim, Harmful axions in superstring models, Phys. Lett. B 5, [doi:./ ]. [] J.E. Kim, Axionic domain wall number related to U anom global symmetry, Phys.Lett.B759, 58 [arxiv:.7 [hep-ph]]. [5] J.J. Atick, L. Dixon, and A. Sen, String calculation of Fayet-Iliopoulos D-terms in arbitrary supersymmetric compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B 9, [doi:./ ]; M. Dine, I. Ichinose, and N. Seiberg, F-terms and D-terms in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 9, [doi:./ ]. [] E. Witten, Cosmic superstrings, Phys. Lett. B 5, 985 [doi:./ ]. [7] X.G. Wen and E. Witten, World sheet instantons and the Peccei-Quinn symmetry, Phys. Lett. B, [doi:./ x]. [8] J.E. Kim, Model dependent axion as quintessence with almost massless hidden sector quarks, JHEP, [arxiv:hep-ph/99758]; K. Choi, Axions and the strong CP problem in M theory, Phys. Rev. D 5, [arxiv:hep-th/977]. [9] K-S. Choi, I-W. Kim, and J.E. Kim, String compactification, QCD axion and axion-photon-photon coupling, JHEP 7, 7 [arxiv:hep-ph/7]. [] K-S. Choi, H.P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sanchez, and P.K.S. Vaudrevange, Accions, Phys. Lett. B 75, 89 [arxiv:9.7 [hep-th]]. [] R. Kappl, H.P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sanchez, M. Ratz, K.i Schmidt-Hoberg, and P.K.S. Vaudrevange, Large hierarchies from approximate R symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett., 9 [arxiv:8. [hep-th]]. [] J.H. Huh,J.E. Kim, andb. Kyae, SU5 flip SU5 from Z I, Phys.Rev.D8, 5 9 [arxiv:9.8 [hep-ph]]. [] P. Athanasopoulos, A.E. Faraggi, S. Groot Nibbelink, and V.M. Mehta, Heterotic free fermionic and symmetric toroidal orbifold models, JHEP, 8 [arxiv:.8 [hep-th]]. [] J-H. Kim, J.E. Kim, and B. Kyae, Superstring standard model from Z I orbifold compactification with and without exotics, and effective R-parity, JHEP 7, 7 [arxiv:hep-ph/778]. [5] S.M. Barr, A new symmetry breaking pattern for SO and proton decay, Phys. Lett. B, 9 98 [doi:./ ]. [] J-P. Derendinger, J.E. Kim, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Anti-SU5, Phys. Lett. B 9, 7 98 [doi:./ ]. [7] I. Antoniadis, J.R. Ellis, J.S. Hagelin, and D.V. Nanopoulos, he flipped SU5 U string model revamped, Phys. Lett. B, [doi:./ ]. [8] C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Hierarchy of quark masses, Cabibbo angles and CP violation, Nucl. Phys. B 7, [doi:./ x]. [9] J.E. Kim, Calculation of axion-photon-photon coupling in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 75, 95 and ibid. 7, 7E [arxiv:5.75 [hep-ph]]. [] K.S. Choi and J.E. Kim, Quarks and Leptons from Orbifolded Superstring, Lect. Notes. Phys. 9 Springer, Heidelberg, [doi:.7/b87]. [] J. Pati and Abdus Salam, Unified lepton-hadron symmetry and a gauge theory of the basic interactions, Phys. Rev. D 8, 97 [doi:./physrevd.8.]. [] J.E. Kim, Abelian discrete symmetries Z N and Z nr from string orbifolds, Phys.Lett.B 7, 5 [arxiv:8. [hep-th]]. [] J.E. Kim and S. Nam, Couplings between QCD axion and photon from string compactification, Phys. Lett. B 759, 9 [arxiv:.5 [hep-ph]]. [] J.E. Kim and B. Kyae, Flipped SU5 from Z I orbifold with Wilson line, Phys.Lett.B 77, 7 7 [arxiv:hep-th/88]. [5] A. Faraggi, Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa mixing in superstring derived standard-like models, Nucl. Phys. B, 99 [doi:./ ]. [] J.E. Kim, Naturally realized two dark Z s near the electroweak scale, Phys.Rev.D 9, 55 7 [arxiv:7.95 [hep-ph]]. [7] G. t Hooft, Renormalizable Lagrangians for massive Yang-Mills fields, Nucl. Phys. B 5, [doi:./ ]. [8] M. Dine, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, Fayet Iliopoulos terms in supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 89, [doi:./ ]. [9] J.J. Atick and A. Sen, wo-loop dilaton tadpole induced by Fayet Iliopoulos D-terms in compactified heterotic string theories, Nucl. Phys. B 9, [doi:./ ]. [] L.E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, and A.M. Uranga,Anomalous U s in type I and type IIB D =, N= string vacua, Nucl. Phys. B 5, 999 [arxiv: hep-th/9889]. [] A.G. Dias, A.C.B. Machado, C.C. Nishi, A. Ringwald, and P. Vaudrevange, he quest for an intermediate-scale accidental axion and further ALPs, JHEP, 7 [arxiv:.57 [hep-ph]]. 7

18 [] K-S. Choi and J.E. Kim, hree family Z orbifold trinification, MSSM and doublet triplet splitting problem, Phys.Lett.B 57, 87 [arxiv: hep-ph/5]. [] G. Segrè and H.A. Weldon, Natural suppression of strong P and violations and calculable mixing angles in SU U, Phys. Rev. Lett., [doi:./physrevlett..9]. [] H. M. Lee, S. Raby, M. Ratz, G. G. Ross, R. Schieren, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and P. K. S. Vaudrevange, Discrete R symmetries for the MSSM and its singlet extensions, Nucl. Phys. B 85, [arxiv:.595 [hep-ph]]. [5] S.M. Barr, Harmless axions in superstring theories, Phys. Lett. B 58, [doi:./ x]. [] J.E. Kim, he strong CP problem in orbifold compactifications and an SU SU U n model, Phys.Lett.B 7, 988 [doi:./ ]. [7] J.L. Lopez and D.V. Nanopoulos, Can an anomalous U solve the strong CP problem?, Phys.Lett.B 5, 99 [doi:./ ]. [8] E. Halyo, Can the axions of standard-like superstring models solve the strong CP problem?, Phys. Lett. B 8, [doi:./7-999-y]. [9] P. Svrcek and E. Witten, Axions in string theory, JHEP, 5 [arxiv:hep-th/5]. 8