Yang-Hwan Ahn Based on arxiv:

Transcription

1 Yang-Hwan Ahn Based on arxiv:

2 Introduction Now that the Higgs boson has been discovered at 126 GeV, assuming that it is indeed exactly the one predicted by the SM, there are several theoretical problems (inclusion of gravity, instability of the Higgs potential, neutrino masses and mixing angles with the CP violating phases, strong CP problem, ) and cosmological issues (dark matter, inflation, cosmological constant, ) point toward the existence of physics beyond the SM. 2

3 Why flavor physics? 3

4 Standard Model Puzzles 4

5 Standard Model Puzzles 5

6 Goal and Motivations A minimal and economic supersymmetric extension of SM for inflation, leptogenesis, and DM scenario can be realized within G=SM X U(1) X X A4 non-abelian discrete smallest group for 3 families 6

7 Goal and Motivations flavor puzzle Symmetry of geometrical solid (tetrahedral) In favor of such a new extension of the SM, Axions and Neutrinos could be powerful sources for both theoretical and cosmological issues, In that They stand out as their convincing physics and the variety of experimental probes. Many of the outstanding mysteries of astrophysics may be hidden from our sight at all wavelengths of the EM spectrum. 7

8 Tetrahedral A 4 & Flavored-PQ U(1) X Symmetry 8

9 Tetrahedral A 4 & Flavored-PQ U(1) X Symmetry 9

10 Tetrahedral A 4 & Flavored-PQ U(1) X Symmetry 10

11 Tetrahedral A 4 & Flavored-PQ U(1) X Symmetry 11

12 Tetrahedral A 4 & Flavored-PQ U(1) X Symmetry to break the flavor group along required VEV directions and to allow the flavons to get VEVs, which only couple to the flavons ( Driving field method, first, by Altarelli and Feruglio 2006 ) spontaneous breaking of the flavor symmetry 12

13 Tetrahedral A 4 & Flavored-PQ U(1) X Symmetry Hierarchy of the SM fermions Vacuum configuration Axion as a solution to strong CP problem and N DW = 1 13

14 Tetrahedral A 4 & Flavored-PQ U(1) X Symmetry The most general superpotential linear in the driving fields 14

15 Leptonic tetrahedral A 4 & flavored-pq U(1) x Symmetry ; 15

16 Leptonic tetrahedral A 4 & flavored-pq U(1) x Symmetry 16

17 Leptonic tetrahedral A 4 & flavored-pq U(1) x Symmetry ç 17

18 Quark tetrahedral A 4 & flavored-pq U(1) x Symmetry A4 triplet : Non-diagonal entries, But only 6 physical parameters CKM? 18

19 Quark tetrahedral A 4 & flavored-pq U(1) x Symmetry 19

20 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X After EW & flavor symmetry breaking, the mass terms Charged quarks and leptons The observed mass hierarchies for Charged quarks and leptons 20

21 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X 21

22 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X Diagonalization of Hermitian matrix νν SS mm DD TT MM RR 1 mm DD 2 Due to the fact that Δm AAAAAA mm 2 νν3 (mm 2 νν1 +mm 2 2 νν2 )/2 Δmm SSSSSS mm 2 νν2 mm 2 2 νν1 Δmm kk NO : mm 2 νν1 < mm 2 2 νν2 < mm νν3, mm 2 SS1 < mm 2 2 SS2 < mm SS3 IO : mm 2 νν3 < mm 2 2 νν1 < mm νν2, mm 2 SS3 < mm 2 2 SS1 < mm SS2 22

23 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X The mass splittings are constrained by for mm ννkk 0.01 eeee, from the leptogenesis and inflationary scenario, if we set the initial minima of AD fields to the 22 (almost) Planck scale, the ratios mm ii /ΔΔmm ii could be fixed as 11 = 22mm 22 ii δδ 22 ii ΔΔmm MM PP ii HH II vv 22 sin 22 ββ 33 cc HH 11/22 Solar neutrino oscillations (arxiv: ) BBN constraints (NPB373,498; astro-ph/ ) Neutrino mass hierarchy in oscillation data Using HH II GGGGGG, sinββ 1, and cc HH 1, we obtain δδ ii eeee The charged WK interaction for the neutrino production and detection UU UU LL 23

24 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X In the limit yy 2 = yy 3 1 sin 2 θθ 12 = 1 3, sin2 θθ 23 = 1 2, sinθθ 13 = 0 δδ 1 = 3mm 0 FF, δδ 2 = 3mm 0, δδ 3 = 3mm 0 GG stars are employed to place constraints on the decay constant of the NG mode AA 22 (QCD axion AA) through the AA 22 to electron interaction (axion AA to photon and neutron interactions) MM = yy Θ GGGGGG δδ GGGGGG νν yy vv TT MM 11 sin 22 ββ eeee νν yy eeee 22 ΛΛ using vv TT /ΛΛ λλ 22 / 22 and tanββ =

25 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X Once the mass splittings Δmm kk 2 are constrained by astronomical-scale baseline experiments, such as IceCube, (θθ 12, θθ 13, θθ 23, δδ CCCC ) and δδ kk are well constrained through Δmm kk 2 = 2 mm kk δδ kk at 95% CL, Planck Collaboration (2015) 22 For the baseline, 44ππππ / ΔΔmm SSSSSS,AAAAAA LL, the probability of neutrino flavor conversion reads PP νναα νν ββ = kk=11 33 UU αααα 22 UU ββββ 22 cos 22 ΔΔmm kk 22 LL 44 EE 25

26 Phenomenology of light neutrino Model prediction: 26

27 Axion interaction to Quarks & charged-leptons Three U(1) symmetries : U(1) PQ U(1) f U(1) Y (except for U(1) R ) EW symmetry breaking UU 11 XX UU 11 ff So, detecting them would provide a window to physics far beyond what can be probed at accelerators 27

28 Axion and Astro-Particle Constraints-I Since the weakly coupled NG modes (the QCD axion) could carry away a large amount of energy from the interior of stars, the couplings should be bounded with electrons. Astrophysical lower bounds on ff aa can be inferred from axion coupling to electrons αα AAAAAA < (95% CCCC) red giant of globular clusters (arxiv: ) αα AAAAAA < White-Dwarf (arxiv: ) gg AAAAAA < (90% CCCC) Sun from XENON100 (arxiv: ) Longstanding anomaly in the cooling of WDs might be explained by axions arxiv: , , etc 28

29 Axion and Strong CP invariance The NG interactions arise only via derivative couplings non-linearly realized global symmetry Under the UU 1 XX transformation, the axion field A translates with the decay constant F A If NN were large, then F AA can be lowered significantly compared to the symmetry breaking scale 29

30 Axion and Strong CP invariance The current JJ μμ XX ii is anomalous, i.e., it is violated at one-loop by the triangle anomaly At low energies AA will get a VEV, eliminating the constant θθ eeeeee term 30

31 Axion and Strong CP invariance TT FF AA Raffelt aa = θθ FF AA 31

32 Axion and Strong CP invariance Raffelt aa = θθ FF AA 32

33 Axion and Astro-Particle Constraints-II Below the chiral symmetry breaking scale, the axion-hadron interactions are meaningful for the axion production rate in the core of a star where the temperature is not as high as 1GeV gg AAAAAA FF AA A hint for extra cooling from the neutron star in the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A by axion neutron bremstrahlung (arxiv: ) 33

34 Axion and Astro-Particle Constraints-II After integrating out the heavy ππ 0 and ηη at low energies gg AAAAAA ff ππ mm aa Recent analysis of the HB stars in galactic GCs (arxiv: ) mm aa 34

35 Axion and Astro-Particle Constraints From the Constraint-I, longstanding anomaly in the cooling of WDs From the Constraint-I, axion to electron interactions From the Constraints-II KSVZ model might be excluded DFSZ model is disfavored if FF DD = f D /N < HH II /2ππ with NN = NN gg tanββ + 1 tanββ due to NN DDDD = 6 35

36 Flavored-Axion : arxiv /

37 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X 37

38 flavored-pq symmetry A4 X U(1) X 38

39 60 TTTTTT EE νν 3 IceCube Inverted ordering Normal ordering 39

40 Conclusion Motivated by the flavored Peccei-Quinn symmetry model for unifying flavor physics and string theory ( ), we constructed an explicit model by introducing an U(1) X symmetry for rather recent but fast growing issues of astro-particle physics and cosmology, in a way that the U(1) X -[gravity] 2 anomaly-free condition with the SM flavor structure demands additional sterile neutrinos as well as no axionic domain wall problem. 40