Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments
|
|
- Anissa McLaughlin
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments B-Basis Design Allowables for Wet Layup / Field Repair Fiber Reinforced Composite Material Systems 3K Plain Weave Carbon Cloth / MGS 418 AGATE-WP August 2001 J. Tomblin, J. McKenna, Y. Ng, K. S. Raju National Institute for Aviation Research Wichita State University Wichita, KS
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION Scope Symbols Used Acronyms and Definitions References Methodology Test Matrix Environmental Conditioning Fluid Sensitivity Screening Normalization Procedures Statistical Analysis Material Performance Envelope and Interpolation Interpolation Example LANCAIR 3K PW CARBON/ MGS 418 WET LAY-UP PROPERTIES Material Documentation by Material Batch Process Specification LANCAIR 3K PW CARBON / MGS 418 LAMINA PROPERTIES Test Results Summary Individual Test Summaries Tension, 2-axis Compression, 2-axis Shear, 12 axis Shear, 13 axis Shear, 13 axis Bearing Strength Individual Test Charts Tension, 2-axis Compression, 2-axis Shear, 12 axis Shear, 13 axis Raw Data Raw Data Spreadsheets and Scatter Charts Fluid Sensitivity Raw Data Spreadsheets and Scatter Charts
3 3.2.3 Representative Shear Stress-Strain Curve Statistical Results Plot by Condition Plot of Pooled Data Moisture Conditioning History Charts DMA Results TESTING AND REPORTING COMMENTS APPENDIX A. DATES OF PANEL MANUFACTURE AND COPY OF FAA FORM
4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope The Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments (AGATE) consortium is an industry-university-government partnership initiated by NASA to create the technological basis for revitalization of the United States general aviation industry. It was founded in 1994 to develop affordable new technology as well as the industrial standards and certification methods for composite airframe, cockpit, flight systems and airspace infrastructure for Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 23 aircraft. The composite material properties contained within the document were generated under Work Package 3: Integrated Design and Manufacturing Methods. Although AGATE was focused towards the small general aviation aircraft (Part 23), the test methods and results contained in this document are consistent with MIL-HDBK-17-1E,2D,3E - Military Handbook for Polymer Matrix Composites. All material, specimens, fixtures and test results contained within this document were traceable and conformed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as part of the AGATE effort. It should be noted that before application of the basis values presented in this document to design, demonstration of the ability to consistently produce equivalent material properties as that evaluated during this program should be substantiated through an acceptable test program. The test methods and results described in this document are intended to provide basic composite properties essential to most methods of analysis. These properties are considered to provide the initial base of the building block approach. Additional coupon level tests and subelement tests may be required to fully substantiate the full-scale design. 4
5 1.2 Symbols Used 21 t c E 2 t E 2 su F 12 su F 13 cu F 2 tu F 2 s G 12 Poisson s ratio, tension relating contraction in the 1 direction as a result of extension in the 2 direction micro-strain compressive modulus, transverse tensile modulus, transverse in plane shear strength apparent interlaminar shear strength compressive strength, transverse tensile strength, transverse in plane shear modulus Superscripts bu c cu s su t tu bearing ultimate compression compression ultimate shear shear ultimate tension tension ultimate Subscripts 1 1 axis; longitudinal 2 2 axis; transverse (parallel to fill direction of reinforcement) 12 in plane shear 13 interlaminar shear (apparent) 5
6 1.3 Acronyms and Definitions A Basis 95% lower confidence limit on the first population percentile AGATE Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials B Basis 95% lower confidence limit on the tenth population percentile C. V. coefficient of variation CTD cold temperature dry CPT cured ply thickness DMA dynamic mechanical analysis dry specimen tested with an as fabricated moisture content ETD elevated temperature dry ETW elevated temperature wet FAR Federal Aviation Regulations FAW fiber areal weight C/Ep Carbon/Epoxy NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration RTD room temperature dry SACMA Suppliers of Advanced Composite Materials Association SRM SACMA Recommended Method T g glass transition temperature t ply cured ply thickness wet specimen tested with an equilibrium moisture content per section
7 1.4 References ASTM Standards D Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials D Shear Properties of Composite Materials by the V-Notched Beam Method D Apparent Interlaminar Shear Strength of Parallel Fiber Composites by Short Beam Method D Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement D Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced Plastics D Void Content of Reinforced Plastics D Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics D Standard Test Method for Bearing Strength of Plastics SACMA Standards SRM 1-94 SRM 8-94 SRM Compressive Properties of Oriented Fiber-Resin Composites Short Beam Shear Strength of Oriented Fiber-Resin Composites Glass Transition Temperature (T g ) Determination by DMA of Oriented Fiber-Resin Composites Other Documents FAA Document DOT/FAA/AR-00/47: Material Qualification and Equivalency for Polymer Matrix Composite Material Systems, J.S. Tomblin, Y.C. Ng and K.S. Raju, MIL-HDBK-17 1E, 2D, 3E Military Handbook for Polymer Matrix Composites PACUSA Lancair Document No: AX Rev. B1, Initial Material Qualification of MGS 418 Resin System with 7781 Glass Fabric and Plain Weave Carbon Cloth for Structural Wet Layup Epoxy Laminates, February
8 1.5 Methodology Test Matrix Testing was performed according to the test methods delineated in the test matrix, with modifications as referenced in the AGATE report, Material Qualification and Equivalency for Polymer Matrix Composite Material Systems. The test matrix for properties included in this document is listed on the next page, with the following notation cited in each column: X# where the X represents the required material batch letter defined as: material containing 3K Plain Weave Carbon from one mill roll, impregnated with one batch of resin in one continuous manufacturing operation with traceability to all components. and the # represents the required number of replicates for that batch. For example, A6, B6, C6 refers to three material batches A, B, and C; with six specimens per batch for a total requirement of 18 test specimens. The minimum sample requirements are shown, but more samples may have been tested. 8
9 Table 1.5.1: Test Matrix and Standards Used TEST METHOD 90 o (fill) Tension ASTM D Strength 90 o (fill) Tension ASTM D Modulus and Strength 90 o (fill) Compression SACMA SRM 1-94 Strength 90 o (fill) Compression SACMA SRM 1-94 Modulus In-Plane Shear Strength ASTM D In-Plane Shear Modulus ASTM D and Strength Short Beam Shear ASTM D NO. OF REPLICATES PER TEST CONDITION CTD 2,6 RTD 1,3,6 ETW 1,4 ETD 5,6 B4 B2 B6 B2 B4 B2 A4, B4, C4 A2, B2, C2 A6, B6, C6 A2, B2, C2 A4, B4, C4 A2, B2, C2 A4, B4, C4, D4 A2, B2, C2, D2 A6, B6, C6, D6 A2, B2, C2, D2 A4, B4, C4, D4 A2, B2, C2, D2 -- A6, B6, C6, D6 Fiber Volume ASTM D One sample per panel Resin Volume ASTM D One sample per panel Void Content 7 ASTM D One sample per panel Cured Neat Resin Density Glass Transition Temperature --- SACMA SRM A4, B4, C4 A2, B2, C2 A6, B6, C6 A2, B2, C2 A4, B4, C4 A2, B2, C Supplied by manufacturer for material 3 dry, 3 wet per material batch Notes : 1 Per the current test plan, panels are Batch D. Per previous revisions, these panels are Batch E. All tested specimens and data sets that are labeled Batch E are equivalent to Batch D. 2 CTD: One batch of material tested (test temperature = o F, moisture content = as fabricated, soak time at 65 was 3 min.) 3 RTD: Three batches of material tested (test temperature = o F, moisture content = as fabricated) 4 ETW: Four batches of material tested (test temperature = o F, moisture content = equilibrium per section 1.5.2, soak time at 180 was 60 sec.) 5 ETD: Three batches of material tested (test temperature = o F, moisture content = as fabricated, soak time at 180 was 3 min.) 6 Dry specimens are as fabricated specimens that have been maintained at ambient conditions in an environmentally controlled laboratory. 7 The generic 418 resin density value (1.2 g/cc) is used to calculate void content and does not take into account the effects of the resin/hardener mix ratio or the cure cycle. 9
10 1.5.2 Environmental Conditioning All wet conditioned samples were exposed to elevated temperature and humidity conditions to establish moisture saturation of the material. Specimens were exposed to 85 ± 5 % relative humidity and 145 ± 5 F until an equilibrium moisture weight gain of traveler, or witness coupons (1 x 1 x specimen thickness) was achieved. ASTM D5229 and SACMA SRM 11 were used as guidelines for environmental conditioning and moisture absorption. Effective moisture equilibrium was achieved when the average moisture content of the traveler specimen changed by less than 0.05% for two consecutive readings within a span of 7 ± 0.5 days and was expressed by: W i -W W b i - 1 < where W i = weight at current time W i-1 = weight at previous time W b = baseline weight prior to conditioning It is common to see small fluctuations in an unfitted plot of the weight gain vs. time curve. There were no fluctuations that made significant errors in results or caused rejection in the moisture equilibrium criteria. Once the traveler coupons passed the criteria for two consecutive readings, the samples were removed from the environmental chamber and placed in a sealed bag with a moist paper or cotton towel for a maximum of 14 days until mechanical testing. Strain gauged specimens were removed from the controlled environment for a maximum of 2 hours for application of gages in ambient laboratory conditions Fluid Sensitivity Screening Although epoxy-based materials historically have not been shown to be sensitive to fluids other than water or moisture, the influence of some fluids other than water or moisture on the mechanical properties were characterized. These fluids fell into two exposure classifications. The first class was considered to be in contact with the material for an extended period of time, and the second class was considered to be wiped on and off (or evaporate) with relatively short exposure times. To assess the degree of sensitivity of fluids other than water or moisture, Table shows the fluids which were used in this qualification plan. 10
11 Table 1.5.2: Fluid Types Used for Sensitivity Studies Fluid Type Jet Fuel (JP-4) Hydraulic Fluid (Tri-N-butyl phosphate ester) Solvent (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) Specification MIL-T-5624 MIL-H-5606G Laboratory Grade Exposure Classification Extended Period Extended Period Wipe On and Off To assess the influence of various fluids types, a test method sensitive to matrix degradation was used as an indicator of fluid sensitivity and compared to the unexposed results at both room temperature dry and elevated temperature dry conditions. Table describes the fluid sensitivity-testing matrix with respect to the fluids defined in Table Engineering judgment and statistical tests were used to assess the degree of material degradation. The results of this screening are included following the data sheets in section Table 1.5.3: Material Qualification Program for Fluid Resistance Fluid Type Test Method Test Temp. ( o F) Exposure 1 Number of Replicates 2 Jet Fuel JP-4 ASTM D See note 4 5 Hydraulic Fluid ASTM D See note 5 5 Solvent (MEK) ASTM D Ambient See note 5 5 Notes : 1 Soaking in fluid at ambient temperature (immersion). 2 Only a single batch of material is required. 3 Shear strength only. 4 Immersion duration = 500 hours 50 hours 5 Immersion duration = 60 to 90 minutes 11
12 1.5.4 Normalization Procedures The normalization procedure attempts to reduce variability in fiber-dominated material properties by adjusting raw test values to a specified fiber volume content. Only the following properties were normalized: 90 (fill) Tension Strength and Modulus 90 (fill) Compression Strength and Modulus The normalization procedure was adopted from MIL-HDBK-17-1E, section The procedure which was used to normalize the data is based on two primary assumptions: The relationship between fiber volume fraction and ultimate laminate strength is linear over the entire range of fiber/resin ratios. (It neglects the effects of resin starvation at high fiber contents.) Fiber volume is not commonly measured for each test sample, so this method accounts for the fiber volume variation between individual test specimens by utilizing a relationship between fiber volume fraction and laminate cured ply thickness. This relationship is virtually linear in the 0.45 to 0.65 fiber volume fraction range. Additional information is detailed in Material Qualification and Equivalency for Polymer Matrix Composite Material Systems. For all normalized data contained in this document, the test values are normalized by cured ply thickness according to: where: CPT Normalized Value Test Value CPT specimen normalizing Average Sample Thickness CPT specimen # of plies 12
13 1.5.5 Statistical Analysis When compared to metallic materials, fiber reinforced composite materials exhibit a high degree of material property variability. This variability is due to many factors, including but not limited to: raw material and prepreg manufacture, material handling, part fabrication techniques, ply stacking sequence, environmental conditions, and testing techniques. This inherent variability drives up the cost of composite testing and tends to render smaller data sets than those produced for metallic materials. This necessitates the usage of statistical techniques for determining reasonable design allowables for composites. The analyses and design allowable generation for both A and B basis values were performed using the procedure detailed in section 5.3 of FAA Document DOT/FAA/AR- 00/47: Material Qualification and Equivalency for Polymer Matrix Composite Material Systems Material Performance Envelope and Interpolation Using the B-basis numbers, a material performance envelope may be generated for the material system by plotting these values as a function of temperature. Figure shows an example material performance envelope using B-basis values. 13
14 CTD B-Basis Strength Values (ksi) Material Performance Envelope RTD ETD ETW Temperature ( o F) Figure Material performance envelope. Since each specific aircraft application of the qualified material may have different Maximum Operational Limits (MOL) than those tested in the material qualification (which is usually the upper limit), some applications may require a reduced MOL. In this case, simple linear interpolation may be used to obtain the corresponding basis values at the new application MOL. This interpolation may be accomplished using the following simple relationships assuming T RTD < T MOL < T ETD : For the corresponding MOL dry basis value, the interpolated basis value using the qualification data is B MOL B RTD BRTD BETD TRTD TMOL T T RTD ETD 14
15 where B MOL = new application basis value interpolated to T MOL B RTD = basis RTD strength value B ETD = basis ETD strength value T RTD = RTD test temperature T ETD = ETD test temperature T MOL = new application MOL temperature For the corresponding MOL wet basis value, an estimated Room Temperature Wet (RTW) value must be calculated. This may be accomplished by the simple relation B RTW B RTD ( B B ) ETW ETD The interpolated wet basis value using the qualification data may then be obtained by B MOL B RTW BRTW BETW TRTW TMOL T T RTW ETW where B MOL = new application basis value interpolated to T MOL B RTW = estimated basis RTW strength value B ETW = basis ETW strength value T RTW = RTW (i.e., RTD) test temperature T ETW = ETW test temperature T MOL = new application MOL temperature These equations may also be used for interpolated mean strengths as well as A-basis values with the appropriate substitutions. It should be noted that because unforeseen material property drop-offs with respect to temperature and environment can occur, extrapolation to a higher MOL should not be attempted without additional testing and verification. In addition, the interpolation equations shown above are practical for materials obeying typical mechanical behavior. In most cases, some minimal amount of testing may also be required to verify the interpolated values Interpolation Example This section provides an example of linear interpolations to a specific application environment less than the tested upper material limit used in qualification. Assuming a specific application environment of 150 o F, Figure depicts the linear interpolation of the B-basis design allowable to this environment. Using the above equations along with the nominal testing temperatures (see Table 1.5.1), the interpolated basis values at 150 o F become 15
16 ETD : B MOL = ksi ETW : B MOL = ksi 120 Actual Basis Value Estimated Value 100 CTD RTD B-Basis Strength Values (ksi) RTW ETD ETW Temperature ( o F) Figure Example of 150 o F interpolation for B-basis values. 16
17 2.0 LANCAIR 3K PW CARBON/ MGS 418 WET LAY-UP PROPERTIES 17
18 2.1 Material Documentation by Material Batch Wet Lay-up Documentation Manufacturer & Product ID: PAC Material Identification (weave, form, class, etc.): Impregnation Method: Wet Layup Resin : Hardener Ratio 100 : 37 by wt. 100 : 40 by wt. 100 : 43 by wt. 100 : 40 by wt. Batch (Lot) ID as labeled on samples A B C D 1 E Date of Manufacture (Post Cure) 6/98 6/98 6/98 6/98 Expiration Date N/A N/A N/A N/A Resin Content [wt %] 38% 38% 38% 46% Reinforcement Areal Weight & Test Method Resin Flow & Test Conditions Gel Time & Test Conditions Volatile Content Reinforcement Documentation See Fabric Info. Not Tested Not Tested Fiber/Fabric Manufacturer & Product ID: Plain-weave, 3K T-300 fibers Precursor Type: Unknown Nominal Filament Count: 3K Fabric with 12.2 ends & 12.4 picks Finish/Sizing Type and %: Unknown Nominal tow or yarn count/inch: Above Twist: Fabric Batch or Lot # Multiple 2 Multiple Multiple Multiple Date of Manufacture Multiple 2 Multiple Multiple Multiple Average Fiber Density per Lot & Test Method g/cc g/cc g/cc g/cc Matrix Documentation Resin Manufacturer & Product ID: MGS 418 Matrix Batch or Lot # (Resin) or No Records Unknown Matrix Batch or Lot # (Hardener) or No Records Date of Manufacture Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Average Neat Resin Density by Lot & Test Method No Records No Certs. No Certs. No Certs. Note: Test Methods used to determine resin content, reinforced areal weight, resin flow, gel time, and volatile content are defined in PAC USA Lancair AX Rev. B1 specification 1 Per current test plan, panels are Batch D. Per previous revisions, these are Batch E. 2 Assumed, but no records. 18
19 2.2 Process Specification This specification does not address issues relating to safety, quality control, bagging material selection, bagging procedure, tool preparation, or equipment selection. Although these may affect overall part quality, it is the responsibility of the end user to develop procedures related to these issues in a manner that produces parts with high quality and consistency. The following processing procedures are excerpts from PACUSA Lancair Document No: AX Rev. B1, "Initial Material Qualification of MGS 418 Resin System with 7781 Glass Fabric and Plain Weave Carbon Cloth for Structural Wet Layup Epoxy Laminates". All test specimens were cured per this specification by Pacific Aviation Composites. Panel Processing Parameters Table defines how the four batches of panels were processed. Definitions for each of the process variables follow the table. Table 2.2.1: Panel Processing Panel Batch Resin Content Fiber Content (by weight %) Curing Agent Content Cure Cycle Glass Carbon A Nominal Minimum Minimum B Nominal Nominal Nominal C Nominal Maximum Over D Maximum Nominal Nominal E Nominal Nominal Nominal Panel Batch A... Minimum curing agent content in combination with the minimum cure cycle and nominal resin content. Panel Batch B... Nominal curing agent content in combination with the nominal cure cycle and nominal resin content. Panel Batch C... Maximum curing agent content in combination with an over cure cycle and nominal resin content. Panel Batch D... Nominal curing agent content in combination with the nominal cure cycle and maximum resin content. Panel Batch E... Nominal curing agent content in combination with the nominal cure cycle and the nominal resin content, using glass fabric from full-scale fatigue test. 19
20 Nominal Resin Content... Layup with 62 1% glass fiber by weight and 53 1% carbon fiber by weight. Max Resin Content... Layup with 54 1% glass fiber by weight and 45 1% carbon fiber by weight. Curing Agent Content... Nominal, Minimum and Maximum in Table Minimum Cure Cycle... Nominal cure cycle temperature minus 30 F with nominal cure time minus 1 hour. Over Cure Cycle... Nominal cure cycle temperature plus 30 F plus three extra nominal cure cycle times. Table 2.1.2: Curing Agent Content Minimum curing agent content Nominal curing agent content Maximum curing agent content 100:37 by weight 100:40 by weight 100:43 by weight Oven Cure Procedure Nominal Cure Cycle 1 : a. Pre-cure undisturbed at room temperature until resin is set, defined as does not stick to the finger when touched. b. Install the assembly in a cool oven (temperatures less than 100 o F). Verify the functioning of the thermocouple recording equipment before initiating the cure. c. Perform post-cure to the following steps: Ramp from ambient to F over a period of minutes (2 hrs). Hold at F for 240 (+10, -0) minutes (4 hrs.). Ramp to 200 ± 10 o F over a period of minutes (2 hrs.). Hold at 200 ± 10 o F for 360 (+10, -0) minutes (6 hrs.). Ramp down below 170 F at a rate not to exceed 10 F per minute before removing the cured panel from the oven. Minimum Cure Cycle 1 : a. Pre-cure undisturbed at room temperature until resin is set, defined as does not stick to the finger when touched. b. Install the assembly in a cool oven (temperatures less than 100 o F). Verify the functioning of the thermocouple recording equipment before initiating the cure. 1 All temperatures are oven temperature. 20
21 c. Perform post-cure to the following steps: Ramp from ambient to F over a period of minutes (2 hrs.). Hold at F for 210 (+10, -0) minutes (3-1/2 hrs.). Ramp to 170 ± 10 o F over a period of minutes (2 hrs.). Hold at 170 ± 10 o F for 330 (+10, -0) minutes (5-1/2 hrs.). Ramp down below 140 F at a rate not to exceed 10 F per minute before removing the cured panel from the oven. Over Cure Cycle 1 : a. Pre-cure undisturbed at room temperature until resin is set, defined as does not stick to the finger when touched. b. Install the assembly in a cool oven (temperatures less than 100 o F). Verify the functioning of the thermocouple recording equipment before initiating the cure. c. Perform post-cure to the following steps: Ramp from ambient to F over a period of minutes (2 hrs.). Hold at F for minutes (14 hrs.). Ramp to 230 ± 10 o F over a period of minutes (2 hrs.). Hold at 230 ± 10 o F for minutes (24 hrs). Ramp down below 170 F at a rate not to exceed 10 F per minute before removing the cured panel from the oven. 21
22 3.0 LANCAIR 3K PW CARBON / MGS 418 LAMINA PROPERTIES 22
23 3.1 Test Results 23
24 3.1.1 Summary MATERIAL: PAC 3K Plain Weave Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Layup 3K PW Carbon/MGS 418 FIBER: 3KT-300 PW Carbon Fibers RESIN: MGS 418 Summary T g (dry): F T g (wet): F T g METHOD: DMA (SRM 18-94) PROCESSING: Vacuum bag cure (22+ in. Hg.): F for hours Date of fiber manufacture Multiple Date of testing 4/12/99 10/4/99 Date of resin manufacture Unknown Date of data submittal 10/8/99 Date of composite manufacture 6/98 Date of analysis 4/13/99 10/5/99 LAMINA MECHANICAL PROPERTY Data Reported as: Measured (Normalized by CPT= in) F 2 tu (ksi) (60.49) CTD RTD ETD ETW B-Basis Mean B-Basis Mean B-Basis Mean B-Basis Mean (65.86) E 2 t (Msi) (7.03) (56.99) (62.06) (6.91) (58.66) (63.87) (6.92) (57.89) (63.03) (6.90) 21 tu (ksi) F 2 cu (ksi) (61.52) (71.55) E 2 c (Msi) (6.45) (53.44) (62.15) (6.25) (39.07) (45.43) (6.14) (32.62) (37.93) (5.92) F 12 su (ksi) G 12 s (Msi) F 13 su** (ksi) ** Apparent interlaminar shear strength 24
25 3.1.2 Individual Test Summaries 25
26 Tension, 2-axis Material: Lancair 3K Plain Weave Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Layup Resin content: wt% Comp. density: g/cc Fiber volume: vol% Void content: 4.5 to 7.2 % Ply thickness: in. Ply range: 12 plies Tension, 2-axis C/Ep 3K PW Carbon / MGS 418 [0] 12 Test method: D Modulus calculation: N/A Normalized by: in. ply thickness CTD (B) RTD (A) ETD (G) ETW(F) Test Temperature [ F] Moisture Conditioning dry dry dry equilibrium Equilibrium at T, RH as fabricated as fabricated as fabricated 145 F, 85 % Source code MWUXXXXB MWUXXXXXA MWUXXXXG MWUXXXXF Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Mean Minimum Maximum C.V.(%) F 2 tu (ksi) B-value A-value E 2 t (Msi) 21 t No. Specimens No. Batches Mean Minimum Maximum C.V.(%) No. Specimens No. Batches Mean No. Specimens No. Batches
27 Compression, 2-axis Material: Lancair 3K Plain Weave Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Layup Resin content: wt% Comp. density: g/cc Fiber volume: vol% Void content: 4.5 to 6.6 % Ply thickness: in. Ply range: 12 plies Compression, 2-axis C/Ep 3K PW Carbon / MGS [0] 12 Test method: D Modulus calculation: N/A Normalized by: N/A CTD (B) RTD (A) ETD (G) ETW(F) Test Temperature [ F] Moisture Conditioning dry dry dry equilibrium Equilibrium at T, RH as fabricated as fabricated as fabricated 145 F, 85 % Source code MWWXXXXB MWWXXXXA MWWXXXXG MWWXXXXF Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Mean Minimum Maximum C.V.(%) F 2 cu (ksi) B-value A-value c E 2 (Msi) No. Specimens No. Batches Mean Minimum Maximum C.V.(%) No. Specimens No. Batches
28 Shear, 12 axis Material: Lancair 3K Plain Weave Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Layup Resin content: wt% Comp. density: g/cc Fiber volume: vol% Void content: 5.2 to 6.6% Ply thickness: in. Ply range: 12 plies Shear, 12-axis C/Ep 3K PW Carbon / MGS 418 [0/90] 6 Test method: D Modulus calculation: N/A Normalized by: N/A CTD (B) RTD (A) ETD (G) ETW(F) Test Temperature [ F] Moisture Conditioning dry dry dry equilibrium Equilibrium at T, RH as fabricated as fabricated as fabricated 145 F, 85 % Source code MWNXXXXB MWNXXXXA MWNXXXXG MWNXXXXF Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Mean Minimum Maximum C.V.(%) F 12 su (ksi) B-value A-value G 12 s (Msi) No. Specimens No. Batches Mean Minimum Maximum C.V.(%) No. Specimens No. Batches
29 Shear, 13 axis Material: Lancair 3K Plain Weave Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Layup Resin content: wt% Comp. density: g/cc Fiber volume: vol% Void content: 4.5 to 6.4 % Ply thickness: in. Ply range: 12 plies Shear, 13-axis C/Ep 3K PW Carbon / MGS 418 [0] 12 Test method: D2344 Modulus calculation: N/A Normalized by: in. ply thickness RTD (A) Test Temperature [ F] Moisture Conditioning Equilibrium at T, RH Source code 75 dry as fabricated MWQXXXX Normalized Measured A Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Normalized Measured Mean 8.79 Minimum 8.27 Maximum 9.43 C.V.(%) 4.09 su F 13 (ksi) B-value 8.15 A-value 7.69 No. Specimens No. Batches 30 4 NOTE: These values represent the apparent interlaminar shear properties and are to be used for quality control purposes only. Do not use these values for interlaminar shear strength design values. 29
30 Bearing Strength Material: Lancair 3K Plain Weave Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Layup Resin content: wt% Comp. density: g/cc Fiber volume: % Void content: 2.8 to 7.9 % Bearing Strength C/Ep Lancair 3K Plain Weave Carbon/MGS 418 Wet Layup Test method: ASTM D Type of bearing test: Double Shear Pin Bearing Fastener Type: Hardened Steel Pin Torque: N/A Normalized by: Not normalized CTD RTD ETD ETW Test Temperature [ F] Moisture Conditioning dry dry dry equilibrium Equilibrium at T, RH as fabricated as fabricated as fabricated 145F, 85% Source code MW#XXXXB MW#XXXXA MW#XXXXG MW#XXXXF Diameter[in] Mean F bu Minimum (ksi) Maximum [0/45/0] s (6 plies) C.V.(%) t ply: in. Failure Mode Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing No. Specimens No. Batches Mean F bu Minimum (ksi) Maximum [(0/45) 5] s (20 plies) C.V.(%) t ply: in. Failure Mode Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing Bearing No. Specimens No. Batches
31 3.1.3 Individual Test Charts 31
32 Tension, 2-axis 90 Tension-- Normalized Strength Strength (ksi) Conditioning X Dry O Wet Temperature ( F) NOTE: The symbols represent the pooled average of all tests, and the bars represent the upper and lower limit of the data. The 180 dry and wet data have been staggered for clarity. 32
33 Compression, 2-axis 90 Compression-- Normalized Strength Strength (ksi) Conditioning X Dry O Wet Temperature ( F) NOTE: The symbols represent the pooled average of all tests, and the bars represent the upper and lower limit of the data. The 180 dry and wet data have been staggered for clarity. 33
34 Shear, 12 axis In-Plane Shear -- Measured Strength Strength (ksi) Conditioning X Dry O Wet Temperature ( F) NOTE: The symbols represent the pooled average of all tests, and the bars represent the upper and lower limit of the data. The 180 dry and wet data have been staggered for clarity. 34
35 Shear, 13 axis 20 Apparent Interlaminar Shear -- Measured Strength 15 Strength (ksi) 10 5 Conditioning X Dry O Wet Temperature ( F) NOTE: The symbols represent the pooled average of all tests, and the bars represent the upper and lower limit of the data. 35
36 3.2 Raw Data Specimen Naming Convention Test coupons were identified using an eight-digit specimen code, with the significance of each digit delineated below. A representative sample ID is shown for reference purposes. M W U F 1 st Character: Fabricator M designates Lancair 2 nd Character: Material System W designates 3K PW Carbon / MGS rd Character: Test Type U designates 90 Tension Strength and Modulus, other test types will be clearly labeled at the top of each sheet 4 th Character: Material Batch ID See Table 2.1 for Lancair Batch ID Documentation. 5 th Character: Panel Number The panel(s) fabricated for a specific test method. 6 th Character: Subpanel Number The sub-panel(s) cut from each panel, with subpanel numbers labeled increasing from reference edge. 7 th Character: Sample Number The sample(s) cut from each subpanel, with samples numbered 1,2 9,A,B,. 8 th Character: Test Condition A --- RTD B --- CTD F --- ETW G --- ETD See Table for condition parameters. 36
37 3.2.1 Raw Data Spreadsheets and Scatter Charts 37
38 90 Tension-- (RTD) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Poisson's Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Ratio Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWUA1X6A A MWUA1X7A A MWUA1X8A A MWUA3X5A A MWUA3X6A A MWUA3X7A A MWUB2X1A B MWUB2X2A B MWUB2X3A B MWUB2X4A B MWUB2X5A B MWUB2X6A B MWUC1X6A C MWUC1X7A C MWUC1X8A C MWUC4X5A C MWUC4X6A C MWUC4X7A C Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec Number of Spec
39 90 Tension -- (RTD) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Strength [ksi] 90 Tension -- (RTD) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Modulus [Msi] 39
40 90 Tension-- (CTD) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Poisson's Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Ratio Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWUB1X1B B MWUB1X2B B MWUB1X3B B MWUB1X4B B MWUB1X5B B MWUB1X6B B Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec Number of Spec
41 90 Tension -- (CTD) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Strength [ksi] 90 Tension -- (CTD) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Modulus [Msi] 41
42 90 Tension-- (ETW) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Poisson's Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Ratio Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWUA1X1F A MWUA1X2F A MWUA1X3F A MWUA1X4F A MWUA1X5F A MWUA3X1F A MWUA3X2F A MWUA3X3F A MWUA3X4F A MWUB3X1F B MWUB3X2F B MWUB3X3F B MWUB3X4F B MWUB3X5F B MWUB3X6F B MWUB3X7F B MWUB3X8F B MWUB3X9F B MWUC4X1F C MWUC4X2F C MWUC4X3F C MWUC4X4F C MWUC1X1F C MWUC1X2F C MWUC1X3F C MWUC1X4F C MWUC1X5F C MWUE1X2F E MWUE1X3F E MWUE1X4F E MWUE1X5F E MWUE1X6F E MWUE1X7F E MWUE1X8F E Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec Number of Spec
43 90 Tension -- (ETW) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Strength [ksi] 90 Tension -- (ETW) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Modulus [Msi] 43
44 90 Tension-- (ETD) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Poisson's Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Ratio Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWUA2X1G A MWUA2X2G A MWUA2X3G A MWUA2X4G A MWUA2X5G A MWUA2X6G A MWUA2X7G A MWUB4X1G B MWUB4X2G B MWUB4X3G B MWUB4X4G B MWUB4X5G B MWUB4X6G B MWUC2X1G C MWUC2X2G C MWUC2X3G C MWUC2X4G C MWUC2X5G C MWUC2X6G C Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec Number of Spec
45 90 Tension -- (ETD) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Strength [ksi] 90 Tension -- (ETD) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Modulus [Msi] 45
46 90 Compression-- (RTD) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWWA121A A MWWA122A A MWWA123A A MWWA124A A MWWA125A A MWWA126A A MWWA127A A MWZA3X6A A MWZA3X7A A MWWB121A B MWWB122A B MWWB123A B MWWB124A B MWWB125A B MWWB126A B MWWB127A B MWZB2X8A B MWZB2X9A B MWWC121A C MWWC122A C MWWC123A C MWWC124A C MWWC125A C MWWC126A C MWZC4X6A C MWZC4X7A C Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec Number of Spec
47 90 Compression -- (RTD) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Compression Strength [ksi] 90 Compression -- (RTD) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Compression Modulus [Msi] 47
48 90 Compression-- (CTD) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWWB411B B MWWB412B B MWWB413B B MWWB414B B MWWB415B B MWWB416B B MWZB2X5B B MWZB2X6B B Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec. 6 2 Number of Spec
49 90 Compression -- (CTD) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Strength [ksi] 90 Compression -- (CTD) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Modulus [Msi] 49
50 90 Compression-- (ETW) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWWA111F A MWWA112F A MWWA113F A MWWA114F A MWWA115F A MWWA116F A MWWA117F A MWWA118F A MWZA3X1F A MWZA3X2F A MWWB111F B MWWB112F B MWWB113F B MWWB114F B MWWB115F B MWWB116F B MWWB117F B MWWB118F B MWZB2X1F B MWZB2X2F B MWWC111F C MWWC112F C MWWC113F C MWWC114F C MWWC115F C MWWC116F C MWWC117F C MWWC118F C MWZC4X1F C MWZC4X2F C MWWE1X1F E MWWE1X2F E MWWE1X3F E MWWE1X4F E MWWE1X5F E MWWE1X6F E MWWE1X7F E MWWE1X8F E MWZE211F E MWZE212F E Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec Number of Spec
51 90 Compression -- (ETW) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Strength [ksi] 90 Compression-- (ETW) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Modulus [Msi] 51
52 90 Compression-- (ETD) Strength & Modulus normalizing t ply [in] Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Strength norm Modulus norm Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] [ksi] [Msi] MWWA119G A MWWA11AG A MWWA128G A MWWA129G A MWWA12AG A MWWA12BG A MWZA3X9G A MWZA3XAG A MWWB128G B MWWB129G B MWWB12AG B MWWB119G B MWWB11AG B MWWB11BG B MWZB2XBG B MWZB2XCG B MWWC119G C MWWC11AG C MWWC11BG C MWWC11CG C MWWC128G C MWWC129G C MWZC4X9G C MWZC4XAG C Average Average norm Standard Dev Standard Dev. norm Coeff. of Var. [%] Coeff. of Var. [%] norm Min Min Max Max Number of Spec Number of Spec
53 90 Compression -- (ETD) Normalized Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Strength [ksi] 90 Compression-- (ETD) Normalized Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Tension Modulus [Msi] 53
54 In-Plane Shear -- (RTD) Strength & Modulus Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWNA121A A MWNA122A A MWNA123A A MWNA124A A MWNA125A A MWNA126A A MWNA127A A MWNB111A B MWNB112A B MWNB113A B MWNB114A B MWNB115A B MWNB129A B MWNB12AA B MWNC131A C MWNC132A C MWNC133A C MWNC134A C MWNC135A C MWNC136A C MWNC137A C Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec
55 In-Plane Shear -- (RTD) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Strength [ksi] In-Plane Shear -- (RTD) Measured Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Modulus [Msi] 55
56 In-Plane Shear -- (CTD) Strength & Modulus Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Batch# Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWNB131B B MWNB132B B MWNB133B B MWNB134B B MWNB135B B MWNB136B B MWNB137B B Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec
57 In-Plane Shear -- (CTD) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Strength [ksi] In-Plane Shear -- (CTD) Measured Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Modulus [Msi] 57
58 In-Plane Shear -- (ETW) Strength & Modulus Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWNA111F A MWNA112F A MWNA113F A MWNA114F A MWNA115F A MWNA116F A MWNA117F A MWNA118F A MWNA119F A MWNB121F B MWNB122F B MWNB123F B MWNB124F B MWNB125F B MWNB126F B MWNB127F B MWNB128F B MWNC111F C MWNC112F C MWNC113F C MWNC114F C MWNC115F C MWNC116F C MWNC117F C MWNC118F C MWNC119F C MWNE111F E MWNE112F E MWNE113F E MWNE114F E MWNE115F E MWNE116F E MWNE117F E MWNE118F E MWNE119F E Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec
59 In-Plane Shear -- (ETW) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Strength [ksi] In-Plane Shear -- (ETW) Measured Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Modulus [Msi] 59
60 In-Plane Shear -- (ETD) Strength & Modulus Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Modulus Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] [Msi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWNA131G A MWNA132G A MWNA133G A MWNA134G A MWNA135G A MWNA136G A MWNA137G A MWNB151G B MWNB152G B MWNB153G B MWNB154G B MWNB155G B MWNB156G B MWNB157G B MWNC141G C MWNC142G C MWNC143G C MWNC144G C MWNC145G C MWNC146G C MWNC147G C Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec
61 In-Plane Shear -- (ETD) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Strength [ksi] In-Plane Shear -- (ETD) Measured Modulus Pooled Average = [Msi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [Msi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation =4.253[%] 4 ASAP Batch # In-Plane Shear Modulus [Msi] 61
62 Apparent Interlaminar Shear -- (RTD) Strength & Modulus Specimen Panel ASAP Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Batch # Batch # [ksi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWQA111A A MWQA112A A MWQA113A A MWQA114A A MWQA115A A MWQA116A A MWQA117A A MWQA118A A MWQB1X1A B MWQB1X2A B MWQB1X3A B MWQB1X4A B MWQB1X5A B MWQB1X6A B MWQB1X7A B MWQB1X8A B MWQC111A C MWQC112A C MWQC113A C MWQC114A C MWQC115A C MWQC116A C MWQC117A C MWQE111A E MWQE112A E MWQE113A E MWQE115A E MWQE116A E MWQE117A E MWQE118A E Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec
63 Apparent Interlaminar Shear -- (RTD) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] 4 ASAP Batch # Apparent Interlaminar Shear Strength [ksi] 63
64 Bearing Strength [45/0/45] s t=0.060",d=0.1875" Condition Specimen Panel Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. tply Number Batch # [ksi] Thickn. [in] laminate [in] MW1B211B B Average MW1B212B B Standard Dev. CTD MW1B213B B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW1B214B B Min. MW1B215B B Max. MW1B216B B Number of Spec. MW1B231A B Average MW1B232A B Standard Dev. RTD MW1B233A B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW1B234A B Min. MW1B235A B Max. MW1B236A B Number of Spec. MW1B221F B MW1B223F B MW1B224F B Average ETW MW1B225F B Standard Dev. MW1B226F B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW1B227F B Min. MW1B228F B Max. MW1B229F B Number of Spec. MW1B111G B Average MW1B112G B Standard Dev. ETD MW1B113G B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW1B114G B Min. MW1B115G B Max. MW1B117G B Number of Spec. 64
65 Bearing Strength [45/0/45]s t=0.060",d=0.1875" ETD4 ETW3 RTD2 CTD Bearing Strength [ksi] 65
66 Bearing Strength [45/0/45] s t=0.060",d=0.250" Condition Specimen Panel Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. tply Number Batch # [ksi] Thickn. [in] laminate [in] MW2B221B B MW2B222B B Average MW2B223B B Standard Dev. CTD MW2B224B B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW2B225B B Min. MW2B226B B Max. MW2B227B B Number of Spec. MW2B111A B Average MW2B112A B Standard Dev. RTD MW2B113A B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW2B115A B Min. MW2B116A B Max. MW2B117A B Number of Spec. MW2B211F B MW2B212F B MW2B213F B Average ETW MW2B214F B Standard Dev. MW2B215F B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW2B216F B Min. MW2B217F B Max. MW2B218F B Number of Spec. MW2B232G B Average MW2B233G B Standard Dev. ETD MW2B234G B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW2B235G B Min. MW2B236G B Max. MW2B237G B Number of Spec. 66
67 Bearing Strength [45/0/45]s t=0.060",d=0.250" ETD4 ETW3 RTD2 CTD Bearing Strength [ksi] 67
68 Bearing Strength [(0/45) 5 ] s t=0.200",d=0.250" Condition Specimen Panel Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. tply Number Batch # [ksi] Thickn. [in] laminate [in] MW3B311B B Average MW3B312B B Standard Dev. CTD MW3B313B B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW3B314B B Min. MW3B315B B Max. MW3B316B B Number of Spec. MW3B331A B Average MW3B332A B Standard Dev. RTD MW3B333A B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW3B334A B Min. MW3B335A B Max. MW3B336A B Number of Spec. MW3B111F B MW3B112F B MW3B113F B Average ETW MW3B114F B Standard Dev. MW3B115F B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW3B116F B Min. MW3B117F B Max. MW3B118F B Number of Spec. MW3B321G B Average MW3B322G B Standard Dev. ETD MW3B323G B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW3B324G B Min. MW3B325G B Max. MW3B326G B Number of Spec. 68
69 Bearing Strength [(0/45) 5 ]s t=0.200",d=0.250" ETD4 ETW3 RTD2 CTD Bearing Strength [ksi] 69
70 Bearing Strength [(0/45) 5 ] s t=0.200",d=0.375" Condition Specimen Panel Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. tply Number Batch # [ksi] Thickn. [in] laminate [in] MW4B211B B Average MW4B212B B Standard Dev. CTD MW4B213B B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW4B214B B Min. MW4B215B B Max. MW4B216B B Number of Spec. MW4B131A B Average MW4B132A B Standard Dev. RTD MW4B133A B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW4B134A B Min. MW4B135A B Max. MW4B136A B Number of Spec. MW4B111F B MW4B112F B MW4B113F B Average ETW MW4B114F B Standard Dev. MW4B115F B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW4B116F B Min. MW4B122F B Max. MW4B123F B Number of Spec. MW4B124G B Average MW4B125G B Standard Dev. ETD MW4B126G B Coeff. of Var. [%] MW4B217G B Min. MW4B218G B Max. MW4B219G B Number of Spec. 70
71 Bearing Strength [(0/45) 5 ]s t=0.200",d=0.375" ETD4 ETW3 RTD2 CTD Bearing Strength [ksi] 71
72 3.2.2 Fluid Sensitivity Raw Data Spreadsheets and Scatter Charts 72
73 In-Plane Shear -- (MEK - RTD) Strength & Modulus Specimen Batch Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Number [ksi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWNC11AT C MWNC138T C MWNC148T C MWNC149T C MWNC14AT C Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec. 5 In-Plane Shear -- (MEK - RTD) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] C3 Batch # B2 A In-Plane Shear Strength [ksi] 73
74 In-Plane Shear -- (JP-4 JET FUEL - ETD) Strength & Modulus Specimen Batch Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Number [ksi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWNA128R A MWNA129R A MWNA12AR A MWNA138R A MWNA139R A MWNA13AR A Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec. 6 In-Plane Shear -- (JP-4 JET FUEL - ETD) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] C3 Batch # B2 A In-Plane Shear Strength [ksi] 74
75 In-Plane Shear -- (Hydraulic Fluid - ETD) Strength & Modulus Specimen Batch Strength Avg. Specimen # Plies in Avg. t ply Number Number [ksi] Thickn. [in] Laminate [in] MWNB138V B MWNB139V B MWNB13AV B MWNB158V B MWNB159V B MWNB15AV B Average Standard Dev Coeff. of Var. [%] Min Min Max Max Number of Spec. 6 In-Plane Shear -- (Hydraulic Fluid - ETD) Measured Strength Pooled Average = [ksi] Pooled Standard Deviation = [ksi] Pooled Coeff. of Variation = [%] C 3 Batch # B 2 A In-Plane Shear Strength [ksi] 75
76 Fluid Sensitivity Comparison: Average In-Plane Shear Strength with Fluid (ksi) MEK (RTD) Same Environment In-Plane Shear Strength without Fluid (ksi) (RTD) Worst Case Environment In-Plane Shear Strength (ksi) (ETW) The RTD average in-plane shear strength was reduced by 1% after exposure to MEK. However it remained 81% higher than water exposure in ETW conditions. Average In-Plane Shear Strength with Fluid (ksi) JP-4 JET FUEL (ETD) 9.48 Same Environment In-Plane Shear Strength without Fluid (ksi) (ETD) 9.65 Worst Case Environment In-Plane Shear Strength (ksi) (ETW) 8.39 The ETD average in-plane shear strength was reduced by 2% after exposure to JP-4 Jet Fuel. However it remained 13% higher than water exposure in ETW conditions. Average In-Plane Shear Strength with Fluid (ksi) HYDRAULIC FLUID (ETD) Same Environment In-Plane Shear Strength without Fluid (ksi) (ETD) Worst Case Environment In-Plane Shear Strength (ksi) (ETW) The ETD average in-plane shear strength was not reduced after exposure to Hydraulic Fluid
77 3.2.3 Representative Shear Stress-Strain Curve The following shear stress-strain curve is representative of the 3K PW Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Lay-up system. The tension and compression stress-strain curves are not presented in graphical form. If strain design allowables from these tests are required, simple one-dimensional linear stress-strain relationships may be used to obtain corresponding strain design values. This process should approximate tensile and compressive strain behavior relatively well but may produce extremely conservative strain values in shear due to the nonlinear behavior. A more realistic approach for shear strain design allowables is to use a maximum strain value of 5% (reference MIL-HDBK- 17-1E, section 5.7.6). If a nonlinear analysis of the material s shear behavior is required, the curve-fit of the shear stress-strain curve may be used. The representative shear stress-strain curve was obtained by taking the average of all the sample shear curves and determining the best-fit line through the data. The actual data points also presented on the chart to demonstrate material variability. 77
78 Shear Stress vs. Shear Strain, RTD Shear Stress [psi] y -1 = a + b/x r 2 = a = e-05 b = e Shear Strain [in/in] 78
79 3.3 Statistical Results 79
80 3.3.1 Plot by Condition 80
81 DISTRIBUTION OF GROUPED DATA FOR DIFFERENT TEST CONDITIONS PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL Lancair CTD RTD ETD ETW NO DATA NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE Tension- MWUXXXXX Measured 81
82 DISTRIBUTION OF GROUPED DATA FOR DIFFERENT TEST CONDITIONS PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL Lancair CTD RTD ETD ETW NO DATA NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE In-Plane Shear - MWUXXXXX Normalized 82
83 DISTRIBUTION OF GROUPED DATA FOR DIFFERENT TEST CONDITIONS PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL Lancair CTD RTD ETD ETW NO DATA NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE Compression - MWWXXXXX Measured 83
84 DISTRIBUTION OF GROUPED DATA FOR DIFFERENT TEST CONDITIONS PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL Lancair CTD RTD ETD ETW NO DATA NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE Compression - MWWXXXXX Normalized 84
85 DISTRIBUTION OF GROUPED DATA FOR DIFFERENT TEST CONDITIONS PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL Lancair CTD RTD ETD ETW NO DATA NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE In-Plane Shear - MWNXXXXX Measured 85
86 DISTRIBUTION OF GROUPED DATA FOR DIFFERENT TEST CONDITIONS PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL Lancair CTD RTD ETD ETW NO DATA NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE NORMAL CURVE Apparent Interlaminar Shear - MWQXXXXX Measured 86
87 3.3.2 Plot of Pooled Data 87
88 DISTRIBUTION OF POOLED DATA Lancair 90 Tension- MWUXXXXX Measured PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL NORMALIZED VALUE 88
89 DISTRIBUTION OF POOLED DATA Lancair In-Plane Shear - MWUXXXXX Normalized PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL NORMALIZED VALUE 89
90 DISTRIBUTION OF POOLED DATA Lancair 90 Compression - MWWXXXXX Measured PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL NORMALIZED VALUE 90
91 DISTRIBUTION OF POOLED DATA Lancair 90 Compression - MWWXXXXX Normalized PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL NORMALIZED VALUE 91
92 DISTRIBUTION OF POOLED DATA Lancair In-Plane Shear - MWNXXXXX Measured PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL NORMALIZED VALUE 92
93 DISTRIBUTION OF POOLED DATA Lancair Apparent Interlaminar Shear - MWQXXXXX Measured PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL NORMALIZED VALUE 93
94 3.4 Moisture Conditioning History Charts 94
95 % Weight Gain (Total) Conditioning History LANCAIR MWUA1 MWUA3 MWUE1 MWUB3 MWUB3 MWUC1 MWUC Time (days) 0.7 Conditioning History LANCAIR 0.6 % Weight Gain (Total) MWWA1 MWWB1 MWWC1 MWWE Time (days) 95
96 0.6 Conditioning History LANCAIR 0.5 % Weight Gain (Total) MWNA MWNB MWNC MWNE Time (days) 0.7 Conditioning History LANCAIR 0.6 % Weight Gain (Total) MWZE1 MWZA3 MWZC4 MWZB Time (days) 96
97 0.4 Conditioning History LANCAIR 0.3 % Weight Gain (Total) MWB12 MWB22 MWB31 MWB Time (days) 0.4 Conditioning History LANCAIR % Weight Gain (Total) Time (days) MWDA MWDB MWDC MWDE 97
98 3.5 DMA Results 98
99 COMPANY: Lancair MATERIAL SYSTEM: 3K PW Carbon / MGS 418 Wet Layup PROJECT: C1 DMA Results -- Onset Storage Modulus DRY WET As Fabricated Moisture Equilibrium at 85% RH Sample # Tg [ C] Tg [ F] Sample # Tg [ C] Tg [ F] MWDA1D7A MWDA1D1F MWDA1D8A MWDA1D2F MWDA1D9A MWDA1D3F MWDB2D7A MWDB2D1F MWDB2D8A MWDB2D2F MWDB2DAA MWDB2D3F MWDC3D7A MWDC3D1F MWDC3D8A MWDC3D2F MWDC3D9A MWDC3D3F MWDE2D7A MWDE2D1F MWDE2D8A MWDE2D2F MWDE2D9A MWDE2D3F Average [ F] Average [ F] Standard Dev. [ F] 8.70 Standard Dev. [ F] 5.07 Coeff. Of Var. [%] 4.02 Coeff. Of Var. [%] 2.44 DMA Results - Peak Tan Delta DRY WET As Fabricated Moisture Equilibrium at 85% RH Sample # Tg [ C] Tg [ F] Sample # Tg [ C] Tg [ F] MWDA1D7A MWDA1D1F MWDA1D8A MWDA1D2F MWDA1D9A MWDA1D3F MWDB2D7A MWDB2D1F MWDB2D8A MWDB2D2F MWDB2DAA MWDB2D3F MWDC3D7A MWDC3D1F MWDC3D8A MWDC3D2F MWDC3D9A MWDC3D3F MWDE2D7A MWDE2D1F MWDE2D8A MWDE2D2F MWDE2D9A MWDE2D3F Average [ F] Average [ F] Standard Dev. [ F] 8.06 Standard Dev. [ F] 2.46 Coeff. Of Var. [%] 3.47 Coeff. Of Var. [%]
100 MWDA1D7A MWDA1D8A 100
101 MWDA1D9A MWDB2D7A 101
102 MWDB2D8A MWDB2DAA 102
103 MWDC3D7A MWDC3D8A 103
104 MWDC3D9A MWDE2D7A 104
105 MWDE2D8A MWDE2D9A 105
106 MWDA1D1F MWDA1D2F 106
107 MWDA1D3F MWDB2D1F 107
108 MWDB2D2F MWDB2D3F 108
109 MWDC3D1F MWDC3D2F 109
110 MWDC3D3F MWDE2D1F 110
111 MWDE2D2F MWDE2D3F 111
112 4.0 TESTING AND REPORTING COMMENTS 112
113 Conformity data is documented and archived as part of the Lancair certification program. FAA project No. TC 1616SE-A. 113
114 APPENDIX A. DATES OF PANEL MANUFACTURE AND COPY OF FAA FORM
115 115
116 116
117 117
118 118
119 119
120 120
121 121
122 122
123 123
Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments
Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments B Basis Design Allowables for Epoxy Based Prepreg 3M E-Glass Fabric 7781 / SP381 AGATE-WP3.3-033051-098 September 2001 J. Tomblin, J. McKenna, Y. Ng, K.
More information2510 PREPREG SYSTEM. Industry Database FAA approved design allowable values (AGATE methodology), results in a low cost one-batch equivalency.
PREPREG SYSTEM The 251 prepreg system is specifically formulated for out-of-autoclave (OOA) processing of aerospace primary structures. This prepreg system has excellent all-around structural properties
More information2510 PREPREG SYSTEM. Industry Database FAA approved design allowable values (AGATE methodology), results in a low cost one-batch equivalency.
PREPREG SYSTEM The 251 prepreg system is specifically formulated for out-of-autoclave (OOA) processing of aerospace primary structures. This prepreg system has excellent all-around structural properties
More information3900 PREPREG SYSTEM. Mechanically Stable Mechanical working life of product is over 40 days, allowing for lay-up of large parts.
PREPREG SYSTEM -series prepregs are highly-toughened 350 F (177 C) cure systems. It is available in a variety of configurations, including unidirectional tape for manual or automated tape laying applications,
More information3900 PREPREG SYSTEM. Mechanically Stable Mechanical working life of product is over 40 days, allowing for lay-up of large parts.
PREPREG SYSTEM 3900-series prepregs are highly-toughened 350 F (177 C) cure systems. It is available in a variety of configurations, including unidirectional tape for manual or automated tape laying applications,
More information3960 PREPREG SYSTEM. Flexible Processing Prepreg can be suitably processed in either AFP or hand lay-up methodologies.
396 PREPREG SYSTEM Toray s nextgeneration #396 prepreg system demonstrates the next leap in performance of aerospace materials. Complementary pairing of the #396 resin system with stateoftheart T11G carbon
More informationTesting for Equivalence. Purpose of Equivalence CMH17 Statistical Analysis Methods
Testing for Equivalence Purpose of Equivalence CMH17 Statistical Analysis Methods September 14-16, 2010 Safety Awareness Workshop Purpose of Equivalence To demonstrate material equivalency: to assure that
More informationA Comparison of Equivalence Criteria and Basis Values for HEXCEL 8552 IM7 Unidirectional Tape computed from the NCAMP shared database
Report No: Report Date: A Comparison of Equivalence Criteria and Basis Values for HEXCEL 8552 IM7 Unidirectional Tape computed from the NCAMP shared database NCAMP Report Number: Report Date: Elizabeth
More informationHexPly F655 Resin Systems for Advanced Composites
HexPly F655 Resin Systems for Advanced Composites Product Data Description HexPly F655 is a bismaleimide resin that cures via an addition reaction in a toughened two-phase thermoset matrix with no condensation
More informationOut life 30 days at 70 F (21 C) Shelf life 6 months at 40 F (4 C) 12 months at 0 F (-18 C)
4708 250-300 F (120-150 C) High T g Epoxy Resin System Typical applications General aviation Aerospace Industrial Sporting goods Out life 30 days at 70 F (21 C) Shelf life 6 months at 40 F (4 C) 12 months
More informationPRODUCT DATA SHEET TYPICAL NEAT RESIN PROPERTIES. Outgassing (TML) % Outgassing (CVCM) % Density g/cc
PRODUCT TYPE 225-250 F (107-121 C) Cure Toughened Cyanate Ester TYPICAL APPLICATIONS High Dimensional Stability Space Structures Optical Benches Reflectors Radomes and Antennae Low Observables Radar Transparent
More informationCYTEC (Formerly Advanced Composites Group) MTM45-1/ 12K AS4 145gsm 32%RW Unidirectional Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
Report No: Report Date: March 25, 2016 CYTEC (Formerly Advanced Composites Group) MTM45-1/ 12K AS4 145gsm 32%RW Unidirectional Qualification Statistical Analysis Report FAA Special Project Number SP3505WI-Q
More informationHexcel 8552 AS4 Plain Weave Fabric Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH Wichita State University NCP-RP-2010-011 Rev A Hexcel 8552 AS4 Plain Weave Fabric Qualification Statistical Analysis Report FAA Special Project Number SP4614WI-Q
More informationAdvanced Composites Group MTM45-1 CF0526A-36%RW 3K Plain Weave G Fabric, 193 gsm Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH Wichita State University Advanced Composites Group MTM45-1 CF0526A-36%RW 3K Plain Weave G30-500 Fabric, 193 gsm Qualification Statistical Analysis Report FAA Special
More informationAdvanced Composites Group MTM45-1/ Style 6781 S2 Glass Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH Wichita State University Advanced Composites Group MTM45-1/ Style 6781 S2 Glass Qualification Statistical Analysis Report FAA Special Project Number SP3505WI-Q
More informationSolvay (Formerly ACG) MTM45-1/CF %RW 3K PW AS4 Fabric Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
Report No: Report Date: Solvay (Formerly ACG) MTM45-1/CF0525-36%RW 3K PW AS4 Fabric Qualification Statistical Analysis Report FAA Special Project Number SP3505WI-Q NCAMP Report No.: NCP-RP-2009-037 N/C
More informationStandard Test Method for Open Hole Tensile Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates 1
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because it may not be technically
More informationSolvay Cytec Cycom T650 Unitape Gr 145 Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH Wichita State University NCP-RP-2013-001 RevA Solvay Cytec Cycom 5320-1 T650 Unitape Gr 145 Qualification Statistical Analysis Report NCAMP Project Number NPN071001
More informationCytec Cycom T650 3k-PW Fabric Material Allowables Statistical Analysis Report
Report No: Report Date: October 13, 2015 Cytec Cycom 5320-1 T650 3k-PW Fabric Material Allowables Statistical Analysis Report NCAMP Project Number NPN071001 NCAMP Report Number: Report Date: October 13,
More informationCytec Cycom T650 Unitape Gr % RC Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
October 19, 2017 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH Wichita State University NCP-RP-2010-068 N/C Cytec Cycom 5250-5 T650 Unitape Gr 145 32% RC Qualification Statistical Analysis Report FAA Special
More informationPREDICTION OF OUT-OF-PLANE FAILURE MODES IN CFRP
PREDICTION OF OUT-OF-PLANE FAILURE MODES IN CFRP R. R. Pinto 1, P. P. Camanho 2 1 INEGI - Instituto de Engenharia Mecanica e Gestao Industrial, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal 2 DEMec,
More information3.2.2 principal material coordinate system, n a coordinate system with axes that are normal to the planes of symmetry inherent to a material
Designation: Standard Test Method for Open Hole Tensile Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 5766/D 5766M; the number immediately following
More informationFailure analysis of serial pinned joints in composite materials
Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences Vol. 18, April 2011, pp. 102-110 Failure analysis of serial pinned joints in composite materials Alaattin Aktaş* Department of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationStandard Practice for Heat Aging of Plastics Without Load 1
Designation: D 3045 92 (Reapproved 2003) Standard Practice for Heat Aging of Plastics Without Load 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 3045; the number immediately following the designation
More informationF ( C) Cure Epoxy Resin System. Out life 30 days at 70 F (21 C)
301 250-300 F (121-149 C) Cure Epoxy Resin System Typical applications Sporting goods Marine Medical Industrial manufacturing Benefits/features Excellent mechanical properties Moderate tack Good toughness
More informationEFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND ENVIRONMENT ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TWO CONTINUOUS CARBON- FIBER AUTOMOTIVE STRUCTURAL COMPOSITES. M. B.
ORNL/TM-2003/117 EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND ENVIRONMENT ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TWO CONTINUOUS CARBON- FIBER AUTOMOTIVE STRUCTURAL COMPOSITES M. B. Ruggles-Wrenn DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Mechanics of Composite Materials, Second Edition Autar K Kaw University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
Mechanics of Composite Materials, Second Edition Autar K Kaw University of South Florida, Tampa, USA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION TO COMPOSITE MATERIALS 1.1 Introduction... 1.2 Classification... 1.2.1
More informationNon-conventional Glass fiber NCF composites with thermoset and thermoplastic matrices. F Talence, France Le Cheylard, France
20 th International Conference on Composite Materials Copenhagen, 19-24th July 2015 Non-conventional Glass fiber NCF composites with thermoset and thermoplastic matrices. Thierry Lorriot 1, Jalal El Yagoubi
More informationWACEL AGGREGATE LABORATORY TESTING TECHNICIAN
STUDY GUIDE WACEL AGGREGATE LABORATORY TESTING TECHNICIAN August 2016 Study Guide Aggregate Laboratory Testing General: An aggregate laboratory technician shall have sufficient training, education, and
More informationCYTEC (Formerly Advanced Composites Group) MTM45-1/ 12K HTS gsm 32%RW Unidirectional Qualification Statistical Analysis Report
Report No: NCP-RP-2009-008 N/C Report Date: March 25, 2016 CYTEC (Formerly Advanced Composites Group) MTM45-1/ 12K HTS5631 145gsm 32%RW Unidirectional Qualification Statistical Analysis Report FAA Special
More informationPRODUCT DATASHEET TENCATE E750 PREPREG BENEFITS/FEATURES
PRODUCT TYPE 80 C (176 F) to 180 C (356 F) cure curing toughened epoxy TYPICAL APPLICATIONS Structural applications within Formula 1 SHELF LIFE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION is a toughened epoxy resin system developed
More informationF ( C) Cure Epoxy Resin System. Out life 30 days at 70 F (21 C)
301 250-300 F (120-150 C) Cure Epoxy Resin System Typical applications Sporting goods Marine Medical Industrial manufacturing Out life 30 days at 70 F (21 C) Shelf life 6 months at 40 F (4 C) 12 months
More informationStrength of GRP-laminates with multiple fragment damages
Strength of GRP-laminates with multiple fragment damages S. Kazemahvazi, J. Kiele, D. Zenkert Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, KTH 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden sohrabk@kth.se SUMMARY The strength of glass fibre
More informationStandard Test Methods for Glass-Bonded Mica Used as Electrical Insulation 1
Designation: D 1039 94 (Reapproved 1999) e1 An American National Standard Standard Test Methods for Glass-Bonded Mica Used as Electrical Insulation 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation
More informationPOLYURETHANE SURFACE TREATMENT ON TWO KINDS OF BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES COMPARISON
POLYURETHANE SURFACE TREATMENT ON TWO KINDS OF BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES COMPARISON Ting YANG 1, Zhenjin CUI 1,Jiahui YANG 2, Yuqiu YANG 2, Hiroyuki HAMADA 1 1 Kyoto Institute of
More informationBIAXIAL STRENGTH INVESTIGATION OF CFRP COMPOSITE LAMINATES BY USING CRUCIFORM SPECIMENS
BIAXIAL STRENGTH INVESTIGATION OF CFRP COMPOSITE LAMINATES BY USING CRUCIFORM SPECIMENS H. Kumazawa and T. Takatoya Airframes and Structures Group, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 6-13-1, Ohsawa, Mitaka,
More informationElastic Moduli of. Composite Materials. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Michigan. (Received May 9, 1977) ABSTRACT SCOPE
Environmental Effects on the Elastic Moduli of Composite Materials CHI-HUNG SHEN AND GEORGE S. SPRINGER Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 (Received
More informationA RESEARCH ON NONLINEAR STABILITY AND FAILURE OF THIN- WALLED COMPOSITE COLUMNS WITH OPEN CROSS-SECTION
A RESEARCH ON NONLINEAR STABILITY AND FAILURE OF THIN- WALLED COMPOSITE COLUMNS WITH OPEN CROSS-SECTION H. Debski a*, J. Bienias b, P. Jakubczak b a Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Machine
More informationCORRELATION BETWEEN RHEOLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES IN A LOW-TEMPERATURE CURE PREPREG COMPOSITE. A Thesis By. Christopher Ronald Gernaat
CORRELATION BETWEEN RHEOLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES IN A LOW-TEMPERATURE CURE PREPREG COMPOSITE A Thesis By Christopher Ronald Gernaat Bachelor of Science, Tennessee Technological University 2002
More informationCrashworthiness of composite structures: Experiment and Simulation
Crashworthiness of composite structures: Experiment and Simulation Francesco Deleo, Bonnie Wade and Prof. Paolo Feraboli (UW) Dr. Mostafa Rassaian (Boeing R&T) JAMS 2010 The Joint Advanced Materials and
More informationri [11111 IlL DIRECTIONAL PROPERTIES Of GLASS-FABRIC-BASE PLASTIC LAMINATE PANELS Of SIZES THAT DO NOT IBUCICLE (P-Q1lAtVjr) No.
Supplement to DIRECTIONAL PROPERTIES Of GLASS-FABRIC-BASE PLASTIC LAMINATE PANELS Of SIZES THAT DO NOT IBUCICLE (P-Q1lAtVjr) No. 1803-13 November 1955 This Report is One of a Series issued hi Cooperation
More informationProject PAJ2 Dynamic Performance of Adhesively Bonded Joints. Report No. 3 August Proposed Draft for the Revision of ISO
NPL Report CMMT(A)81 Project PAJ2 Dynamic Performance of Adhesively Bonded Joints Report No. 3 August 1997 Proposed Draft for the Revision of ISO 11003-2 Adhesives - Determination of Shear Behaviour of
More informationIJSER 1. INTRODUCTION. M.Elhadary
1591 A new failure criterion for GRP composite materials subjected to in-phase and out-of-phase biaxial fatigue loading under different stress ratios M.Elhadary Abstract this studying the fatigue behavior
More informationGB/T / ISO 527-1:1993
Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB/T1040.1-2006 www.chinesestandard.net Sales@ChineseStandard.net GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA ICS 83.080.01 G 31 GB/T 1040.1-2006 / ISO
More informationEFFECT OF THERMAL FATIGUE ON INTRALAMINAR CRACKING IN LAMINATES LOADED IN TENSION
EFFECT OF THERMAL FATIGUE ON INTRALAMINAR CRACKING IN LAMINATES LOADED IN TENSION J.Varna and R.Joffe Dept of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering Lulea University of Technology, SE 97187, Lulea,
More informationIPC-TM-650 TEST METHODS MANUAL
3000 Lakeside Drive, Suite 105N Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 TEST METHODS MNUL Number Thermal Stress, Convection Reflow ssembly Simulation Originating Task Group Thermal Stress Test Methodology Subcommittee
More informationA STRUCTURE DESIGN OF CFRP REAR PRESSURE BULKHEAD WITHOUT STIFFENERS
Xi an, 2-25 th August 217 A STRUCTURE DESIGN OF CFRP REAR PRESSURE BULKHEAD WITHOUT STIFFENERS LI Zhongyang 1, LI Dong 2 Mailbox72-35, Yanliang District, Xian, China, Email: zhongyangli@live.com Keywords:
More informationMODELING OF THE BEHAVIOR OF WOVEN LAMINATED COMPOSITES UNTIL RUPTURE
MODELING OF THE BEHAVIOR OF WOVEN LAMINATED COMPOSITES UNTIL RUPTURE Jean Paul Charles, Christian Hochard,3, Pierre Antoine Aubourg,3 Eurocopter, 375 Marignane cedex, France Unimeca, 6 rue J. Curie, 3453
More information4.MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
4.MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS The diagram representing the relation between stress and strain in a given material is an important characteristic of the material. To obtain the stress-strain diagram
More informationThe Accuracy of Characteristic Length Method on Failure Load Prediction of Composite Pinned Joints
, June 30 - July 2, 2010, London, U.K. The Accuracy of Characteristic Length Method on Failure Load Prediction of Composite Pinned Joints O. Aluko, and Q. Mazumder Abstract An analytical model was developed
More informationHygrothermal stresses in laminates
Hygrothermal stresses in laminates Changing environment conditions (temperature and moisture) have an important effect on the properties which are matrix dominated. Change in temperaturet and moisture
More informationFinite Element-Based Failure Models for Carbon/Epoxy Tape Composites
Finite Element-Based Failure Models for Carbon/Epoxy Tape Composites A Master Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Guillaume Seon In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master
More informationWestmoreland Mechanical Testing. Non Metallic Materials Testing
This certificate is granted and awarded by the authority of the Nadcap Management Council to: 221 Westmoreland Drive Youngstown, PA 15696 United States This certificate demonstrates conformance and recognition
More informationHigh Fidelity Failure Analysis for A Composite Fuselage Section 1
High Fidelity Failure Analysis for A Composite Fuselage Section 1 Jian Li Engineer/Scientist, The Boeing Company Mesa, Arizona Jian.Li@Boeing.com Carlos G. Dávila Aerospace Engineer, NASA Langley Research
More informationRUNWAY DEBRIS IMPACT ON GENERIC COMPOSITE TURBOFAN BLADE MULTISCALE PROGRESSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS
RUNWAY DEBRIS IMPACT ON GENERIC COMPOSITE TURBOFAN BLADE MULTISCALE PROGRESSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS Gong Huiling 1 Frank Abdi 2 Marc VillàMontero 2 Cody Godines 2 1 MVT Group Inc, Shanghai, China 2 Alpha
More informationNP-175FR. High luminance of multi-functional epoxy contrast with copper
New: 2018/09/12 Flame retardant copper clad laminate NP-175FR Characteristics Unit Conditioning Typical Values SPEC Test Method Volume resistivity MΩ-cm C-96/35/90 5 x10 9 ~ 5x10 10 10 6 2.5.17 Surface
More informationPb-Free Reflow, PCB Degradation, and the Influence of Moisture Absorption
Pb-Free Reflow, PCB Degradation, and the Influence of Moisture Absorption Kerin O Toole, Bob Esser, Seth Binfield, and Craig Hillman, DfR Solutions, College Park, MD Joe Beers, Gold Circuits, Abstract
More informationMulti Disciplinary Delamination Studies In Frp Composites Using 3d Finite Element Analysis Mohan Rentala
Multi Disciplinary Delamination Studies In Frp Composites Using 3d Finite Element Analysis Mohan Rentala Abstract: FRP laminated composites have been extensively used in Aerospace and allied industries
More informationEVALUATION OF THE COEFFICIENTS OF MOISTURE EXPANSION USING TRANSIENT SIMULATED LAMINATES METHODOLOGY (TSL)
EVALUATION OF THE COEFFICIENTS OF MOISTURE EXPANSION USING TRANSIENT SIMULATED LAMINATES METHODOLOGY (TSL) Takeshi Takatoya, Kimo Chung, Yi-Jui Wu, and James C. Seferis Polymeric Composites Laboratory,
More informationLS-DYNA MAT54 for simulating composite crash energy absorption
LS-DYNA MAT54 for simulating composite crash energy absorption Bonnie Wade and Paolo Feraboli (UW) Mostafa Rassaian (Boeing BR&T) JAMS 2011 The Joint Advanced Materials and Structures Center of Excellence
More informationInfluence of the filament winding process variables on the mechanical behavior of a composite pressure vessel
Influence of the filament winding process variables on the mechanical behavior of a composite pressure vessel G. Vargas 1 & A. Miravete 2 1 Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica,
More informationNUTC R296. Advanced Moisture Modeling of Polymer Composites. K. Chandrashekhara Curators Professor Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Advanced Moisture Modeling of Polymer Composites by K. Chandrashekhara Curators Professor Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering NUTC R296 A National University Transportation Center at Missouri
More informationIPC-TM-650 TEST METHODS MANUAL
ASSOCIATION CONNECTING ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES 3000 Lakeside Drive, Suite 309S Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 TEST METHODS MANUAL Number Thermal Stress, Convection Reflow Assembly Simulation Originating Task
More informationMIL-HDBK-5H 1 December 1998
Effects of temperature and of thermal exposure on strength and certain other properties are presented graphically. Methods for determining these curves differ and are described below. Tensile ultimate
More informationLAMINATION THEORY FOR THE STRENGTH OF FIBER COMPOSITE MATERIALS
XXII. LAMINATION THEORY FOR THE STRENGTH OF FIBER COMPOSITE MATERIALS Introduction The lamination theory for the elastic stiffness of fiber composite materials is the backbone of the entire field, it holds
More informationNUMERICAL MODELLING OF COMPOSITE PIN- JOINTS AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION
NUMERICAL MODELLING OF COMPOSITE PIN- JOINTS AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION Fabrice PIERRON*, François CERISIER*, and Michel GRÉDIAC** * SMS/ Département Mécanique et Matériaux, École Nationale Supérieure
More informationStrength and Damage Tolerance of Adhesively Bonded Joints: Stress-Based and Fracture-Based Approaches
Strength and Damage Tolerance of Adhesively Bonded Joints: Stress-Based and Fracture-Based Approaches Hyonny Kim Assistant Professor School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University presented
More informationStandard Test Method for Moisture Absorption Properties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials 1
Designation: D 5229/D 5229M 92 (Reapproved 2004) Standard Test Method for Moisture Absorption Properties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials 1 This standard is issued under
More informationA fatigue design methodology for GRP composites in offshore underwater applications
A fatigue design methodology for GRP composites in offshore underwater applications Dr P. A. FRIEZE P A F A Consulting Engineers Limited, Hampton, Middx, UK INTRODUCTION Norsk Hydro Troll C field - floating
More informationAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards. Mechanical Testing of Composites and their Constituents
Mechanical Testing of Composites and their Constituents American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards Tests done to determine intrinsic material properties such as modulus and strength for
More informationDAMAGE MECHANICS MODEL FOR OFF-AXIS FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF UNIDIRECTIONAL CARBON FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES AT ROOM AND HIGH TEMPERATURES
DAMAGE MECHANICS MODEL FOR OFF-AXIS FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF UNIDIRECTIONAL CARBON FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES AT ROOM AND HIGH TEMPERATURES M. Kawai Institute of Engineering Mechanics University of Tsukuba,
More informationChapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter
Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete cross-section C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF THERMOELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS AS A NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION TOOL
DEVELOPMENT OF THERMOELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS AS A NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION TOOL S. Quinn*, R.K. Fruehmann and J.M. Dulieu-Barton School of Engineering Sciences University of Southampton Southampton SO17
More informationSIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF APPARENT THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY AND DISTORTION OF COMPOSITES AT HIGH TEMPERATURE
SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF APPARENT THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY AND DISTORTION OF COMPOSITES AT HIGH TEMPERATURE V. Urso Miano, G.A. Jones and A. G. Gibson School of Mechanical & Systems Engineering, Newcastle
More informationCoupling of plasticity and damage in glass fibre reinforced polymer composites
EPJ Web of Conferences 6, 48 1) DOI: 1.151/epjconf/1648 c Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 1 Coupling of plasticity and damage in glass fibre reinforced polymer composites R. Kvale Joki
More informationTensile behaviour of anti-symmetric CFRP composite
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 1 (211) 1865 187 ICM11 Tensile behaviour of anti-symmetric CFRP composite K. J. Wong a,b, *, X. J. Gong a, S. Aivazzadeh a, M. N. Tamin b
More informationRepair of Composite Laminates
DOT/FAA/AR-00/46 Office of Aviation Research Washington, D.C. 0591 Repair of Composite aminates December 000 Final Report This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information
More information[5] Stress and Strain
[5] Stress and Strain Page 1 of 34 [5] Stress and Strain [5.1] Internal Stress of Solids [5.2] Design of Simple Connections (will not be covered in class) [5.3] Deformation and Strain [5.4] Hooke s Law
More informationStrain Gage Calibration Factors for Constant Room Temperature Conditions. Gage Resistance, Gage Factor and Transverse Sensitivity Coefficient)
Strain Gage Calibration Factors for Constant Room Temperature Conditions (Or equivalently, measurement of the room temperature (Or equivalently, measurement of the room temperature Gage Resistance, Gage
More informationMIL-HDBK-5H 1 December 1998
components are calculated. In some cases, the methods presented are empirical and subject to further refinements. Any further expansion of information on element behavior in MIL-HDBK-5 will emphasize those
More informationMECHANICAL FAILURE OF A COMPOSITE HELICOPTER STRUCTURE UNDER STATIC LOADING
MECHANICAL FAILURE OF A COMPOSITE HELICOPTER STRUCTURE UNDER STATIC LOADING Steven Roy, Larry Lessard Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada ABSTRACT The design and
More informationADVANCED MOISTURE MODELING OF POLYMER COMPOSITES
Proceedings of the 6th Annual ISC Graduate Research Symposium ISC-GRS 22 April 3, 22, Rolla, Missouri ADVANCED MOISTURE MODELING OF POLYMER COMPOSITES ABSTRACT Long term moisture exposure has been shown
More informationComposite Materials Research Laboratory, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY , USA
Composite Interfaces, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 257 275 (2000) VSP 2000. Discontinuous surface-treated submicron-diameter carbon filaments as an interlaminar filler in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites for
More informationCOMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE HIGH TEMPERATURE TESTING METHODS FOR SILICONE PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVES
COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE HIGH TEMPERATURE TESTING METHODS FOR SILICONE PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVES Elizabeth Kelley, Senior Chemist, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI Timothy Mitchell, Associate
More informationMicrosemi Power Modules. Reliability tests for Automotive application
Microsemi Power Modules Reliability tests for Automotive application on basis of AEC-Q101 SP module line 1/ 10 Introduction With reference to standard AEC-Q101, designed by Automotive Electronics Council
More informationEffects of Error, Variability, Testing and Safety Factors on Aircraft Safety
Effects of Error, Variability, Testing and Safety Factors on Aircraft Safety E. Acar *, A. Kale ** and R.T. Haftka Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville,
More informationNUMERICAL DESIGN OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS THROUGH MULTI-SCALE COMPUTER SIMULATION
THE 19 TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS NUMERICAL DESIGN OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS THROUGH J. Leach 1 *, J. Mackiewicz 2, Dr. S. Risser 1 1 Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, USA,
More informationCrashworthiness of Composite Structures: Modeling of the Crushing of UD Tape Sinuisoidal Specimens using a Progressive Failure Model
Crashworthiness of Composite Structures: Modeling of the Crushing of UD Tape Sinuisoidal Specimens using a Progressive Failure Model Presented at AMTAS Fall Meeting Edmonds, WA - October. 2010 Francesco
More informationPREDICTION OF FAILURE BEHAVIOUR OF COMPOSITE LATTICE STRUCTURE UNDER COMPRESSIVE LOAD
PREDICTION OF FAILURE BEHAVIOUR OF COMPOSITE LATTICE STRUCTURE UNDER COMPRESSIVE LOAD Min-Hyeok Jeon. 1, Min-Song Kang 1, Mun-Guk Kim 1, Eun-Su Go 1, In-Gul Kim. 1, and Sang-Woo Lee 2 1 Aerospace Engineering,
More informationUSE OF DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION TO OBTAIN MATERIAL MODEL PARAMETERS FOR COMPOSITES
USE OF DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION TO OBTAIN MATERIAL MODEL PARAMETERS FOR COMPOSITES Brian Croop, Hubert Lobo (DatapointLabs, USA). Presenter: Hubert Lobo, President SUMMARY The development of material
More informationSpecification for Embedded Passive Device Capacitor Materials for Rigid and Multilayer Printed Boards
IPC-4821 ASSOCIATION CONNECTING ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES Specification for Embedded Passive Device Capacitor Materials for Rigid and Multilayer Printed Boards Developed by the Embedded Component Materials
More informationNP-180R. U.L. file number E98983
New: 2018/09/12 Flame retardant copper clad laminate NP-180R High Tg 175 (DSC) Excellent dimensional stability through-hole reliability Excellent electrical, chemical and heat resistance properties IPC-4101E
More informationDesign of Hybrid Composites for Axial loads with Zero Coefficient of Thermal Expansion
Design of Hybrid Composites for Axial loads with Zero Coefficient of Thermal Expansion Zaffar M. Khan 1 and Asim Shahzad 2 Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan, 44000 Aerospace structures
More informationACDC. User Manual. Ver. 1.0
ACDC User Manual Ver. 1.0 Centre Composite December 2016 ACDC, Ver. 1.0 User Manual Centre Composite, 2016 (software@composite.lv) Table of Contents Introduction... 1 System requirements... 1 Theoretical
More informationA Study on the Tube of Integral Propeller Shaft for the Rear-wheel Drive Automobile Using Carbon Composite Fiber
A Study on the Tube of Integral Propeller Shaft for the Rear-wheel Drive Automobile Using Carbon Composite Fiber Kibong Han Mechatronics Department, Jungwon University, 85 Munmu-ro, Goesan-gun, South Korea.
More informationREVISIONS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVAL
REVISIONS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVAL - A Initial Release Revised per RN A-159 03/11/2008 07/17/2009 JS SHEET REVISION STATUS SH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 REV A A A A A A
More informationA Numerical Study on Prediction of BFS in Composite Structures under Ballistic Impact
VOL. 1, 2015 ISSN 2394 3750 EISSN 2394 3769 SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A Numerical Study on Prediction of BFS in Composite Structures under Ballistic Impact Bandaru Aswani Kumar 1, Suhail Ahmad 2 1. Research
More informationASSESSING INTERLAMINAR SHEAR STRESS-STRAIN CURVES IN TAPE COMPOSITES BASED ON THE FLAT-PLATE TORSION METHOD GARY STEVEN GROHMAN JR
ASSESSING INTERLAMINAR SHEAR STRESS-STRAIN CURVES IN TAPE COMPOSITES BASED ON THE FLAT-PLATE TORSION METHOD by GARY STEVEN GROHMAN JR Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of
More informationMechanics of Materials
Mechanics of Materials Notation: a = acceleration = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) SD = allowable stress design d = diameter of a hole = calculus symbol for differentiation e = change
More informationTHREE DIMENSIONAL STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE T BOLT JOINT
THREE DIMENSIONAL STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE T BOLT JOINT Víctor Martínez 1, Alfredo Güemes 2, Norbert Blanco 1, Josep Costa 1 1 Escola Politècnica Superior. Universitat de Girona. Girona, Spain (17071) 2
More information