Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for feedback linearizable systems
|
|
- Bernadette Thomas
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for feedback linearizable systems Ernesto Kofman, Fernando Fontenla Hernan Haimovich María M. Seron CONICET; Depto. de Electrónica, Fac. de Cs. Exactas, Ing. y Agrim., Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Riobamba 5bis, Rosario, Argentina. Centre for Complex Dynamic Systems and Control, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 3, Australia. Abstract: For a class of perturbed feedback linearizable nonlinear systems, we consider the computation and assignment of prescribed ultimate bounds on the system states. We employ a recently proposed componentwise bound computation procedure, which directly takes into account both the system and perturbation structures by performing componentwise analysis. We first derive sufficient conditions to ensure that the trajectories originating from initial conditions in an appropriate set are ultimately bounded. Secondly, and most importantly, for statefeedback-linearizable nonlinear systems with matched perturbations, we provide a systematic design procedure to compute a state feedback control that ensures a prescribed ultimate bound for the closed-loop system states. The procedure combines nonlinear state-feedbacklinearizing control with a state-feedback matrix computed via an eigenstructure assignment method previously reported by the authors. A simulation example illustrates the simplicity and systematicity of the proposed design method.. INTRODUCTION This paper considers the computation and assignment via state feedback of ultimate bounds on the closed-loop trajectories of perturbed state-feedback-linearizable nonlinear systems. Perturbations in dynamic systems may arise from unknown disturbance signals, model uncertainty, component ageing, etc. Bounds on the perturbation variables are typically known and may be used to obtain, under certain conditions, ultimate bounds on the perturbed system trajectories. A standard approach for the computation of ultimate bounds is the use of level sets of suitable Lyapunov functions [see, for example, Section 9. of Khalil (). An alternative approach was proposed in Kofman (5), Kofman et al. (7a) and Haimovich (), where componentwise ultimate bound formulae were derived exploiting the system geometry in modal coordinates as well as the perturbation structure, without requiring the computation of a Lyapunov function for the system. For some system and perturbation structures, this componentwise approach was shown to provide bounds that are much tighter than those obtained via standard Lyapunov analysis. For linear systems with matched perturbations (that is, perturbations that span the same space spanned by the control input), an ultimate bound on the closed-loop trajectories can be arbitrarily assigned by state feedback control (Schmitendorf and Barmish, 9). Several control design methods, based on a Lyapunov approach, which can achieve an arbitrarily small ultimate bound for linear uncertain systems have been reported in the robust control kofman@fceia.unr.edu.ar literature (see, for example, Barmish et al., 93; Trinh and Aldeen, 99; Cao and Sun, 99; Oucheriah, 999). Taking a departure from Lyapunov analysis and exploiting the aforementioned componentwise approach for ultimate bound computation, we proposed in Kofman et al. (, 7b) a new controller design method for linear, continous-time systems that guarantees a prespecified ultimate bound on the closed-loop system trajectories. The method takes advantage of the dependency of the componentwise ultimate bound expressions on the system eigenstructure. Using techniques of eigenvalue and eigenvector assignment by state feedback, we showed that a state feedback gain can be designed such that the ultimate bound expression decreases to zero as a scaling parameter, associated with the magnitude of the closedloop eigenvalues, increases. The proposed design procedure is systematic in the sense that, once a desired normalized configuration is chosen for the closed-loop eigenvalues, it only requires to increase the scaling parameter at most once for the desired ultimate bound on each component of the state to be achieved. In the current paper we extend the design method of Kofman et al. (, 7b) to perturbed state-feedbacklinearizable nonlinear systems (Isidori, 995). The latter are systems which, under suitable nonlinear feedback and coordinate transformation, can be expressed as a linear asymptotically stable system with nonlinear perturbation terms. For these systems, we derive sufficient conditions to ensure that the trajectories originating from initial conditions in an appropriate set are ultimately bounded. Moreover, for state-feedback-linearizable nonlinear systems with matched perturbations, we provide an algorithm
2 to systematically design a state feedback control that ensures a prescribed ultimate bound for the closed-loop system states. The proposed algorithm combines standard nonlinear feedback linearizing control [see, for example, Isidori (995) with a state-feedback matrix designed based on the method of Kofman et al. (, 7b). An example of a synchronous generator illustrates the simplicity and systematicity of the approach. Simulation results for this example under persistent perturbations satisfying appropriate bounds also demonstrate the potential of the method to obtain relatively tight bounds on the closedloop trajectories. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section presents the class of nonlinear systems under consideration and outlines the goals of the paper. Section 3 reviews some preliminary results needed to achieve the desired goals. Section presents the main contributions of the paper, namely, a systematic method to compute componentwise ultimate bounds for statefeedback-linearizable systems and a systematic control design methodology so that any desired ultimate bound is achieved in the case of matched perturbations. Section 5 illustrates the results with an example of a synchronous generator. Finally, Section concludes the paper. Notation. In the sequel, R and C denote the sets of real and complex numbers, respectively. M and Re(M) denote the elementwise magnitude and real part, respectively, of a (possibly complex) matrix or vector M. The expression x y (x y) denotes the set of componentwise (strict) inequalities between the elements of the real vectors (or matrices) x and y, and similarly for x y (x y). R + and R +, denote the positive and nonnegative real numbers, respectively. For c C, c denotes its complex conjugate.. PROBLEM STATEMENT Consider the following continuous-time nonlinear system with n states, m inputs, and k disturbance variables: m k ẋ = f(x) + g i (x)u i + h j (x)w j, () i= j= where x(t) R n, f() =, and such that f, g,..., g m, h,..., h k are smooth (C ) vector fields defined on an open set U x R n containing the origin. The disturbance variables w,..., w k are assumed to be bounded as follows: w j (t) θ j (x(t)), for all t, for j =,...,k, () where θ j (x) for all x U x. We write () in condensed form as follows: w(t) θ(x(t)), for all t, (3) with w = col(w,..., w k ) and θ = col(θ,..., θ k ). Also, we hereafter denote u = col(u,...,u m ), g = [g... g m and h = [h... h k. Associated with () is the nominal system m ẋ = f(x) + g i (x)u i = f(x) + g(x)u. () i= The nominal system () is assumed to be state-feedbacklinearizable in U x (Isidori, 995), that is, there exist a coordinate transformation (diffeomorphism) z = Φ(x) and a pair of feedback functions α(x) and β(x), all defined on U x, so that β(x) is nonsingular for all x U x and [ Φ (f(x) + g(x)α(x)) = A z, (5) x [ Φ x (g(x)β(x)) = B, () where A = diag(a,...,a m ), B = diag(b,..., b m ), (7) A i R di di, b i R di, A i = , b i =, () for i =,...,m, and m i= d i = n. Therefore, in this case application of the state-feedback law u = α(x) + β(x)v to system (), where v = col(v,..., v m ) is a new input, jointly with the change of coordinates z = Φ(x), yields ż = A z + B v + [ Φ x h(x) w. (9) Application of the additional state-feedback law v = Kz to (9) or, equivalently, application of u = α(x) + β(x)kφ(x) () to (), yields [ Φ ż = (A + B K)z + x h(x) w. () A particular important type of systems of the form () is given by the case of matched perturbations, namely the case when h(x) = g(x)γ(x), for some matrix γ(x) of smooth functions defined on U x. For this type of systems, application of () yields the closed-loop system [ ż = (A + B K)z + B β (x)γ(x) w. () This work has the following goals: G) to provide sufficient conditions to ensure that the trajectories of system (), under a feedback law of the form (), are ultimately bounded. G) to estimate an ultimate bound for such closed-loop system, and G3) to design matrix K in () so that the system state trajectories are ultimately bounded and satisfy a given ultimate bound in the case of matched perturbations. Before proceeding with some preliminary results required to achieve the above goals, we observe that the setting ()-(3) can accommodate any combination of the following types of uncertainty: Uncertainty in the system evolution function, where ẋ(t) = (f(x)+ f(x))+g(x)u(t), and f(x) φ(x), t ; in this case, we can take h(x) = I n in () and θ(x) = φ(x) in (3). Uncertainty in the system input function [assuming a feedback u = κ(x) in (), where ẋ(t) = f(x)+(g(x)+ g(x))κ(x), and g(x) γ(x), t ; in this case,
3 we can take h(x) = I n in () and θ(x) = γ(x) κ(x) in (3). Bounded disturbances, where w(t) w, t ; in this case, we can take θ(x) = w in (3). 3. PRELIMINARY RESULTS In this section, we state previous results that are needed to achieve the goals outlined above. Section 3. presents a method for computing a componentwise ultimate bound for a linear system with an additive perturbation having a bound that may depend on the linear system state. Section 3. recalls a result that shows how a linear state feedback may be designed to assign closed-loop eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a linear system. 3. Ultimate Bound of a Perturbed Linear System The following result computes a componentwise ultimate bound for a LTI system in presence of perturbations that are componentwise bounded by functions of the system state. This result is a modified version of Theorem of Kofman et al. (7a). Theorem. Consider the system ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Hv(t), (3) where x(t) R n, v(t) R k, H R n k, and A R n n is Hurwitz with (complex) Jordan canonical form Λ = V AV. Suppose that v(t) δ(x(t)) t, () where δ : R n R k +, is a continuous map verifying x δ(x ) δ( ). (5) Consider the map T : R n R n +, defined by T(x) V S H δ(x), () where S H [Re(Λ) V H. (7) Suppose that there exists x m R n satisfying, T(x m ) x m. Then, ) b lim r T r (x m ) exists and satisfies b x m. ) If V x() S H δ(x m ), then a) V x(t) S H δ(x m ) for all t. b) Also, given a positive vector ǫ R n +, a finite time t f exists so that for all t t f, i) V x(t) S H δ(b) + ǫ. ii) x(t) b + V ǫ. The proof of this theorem is almost identical to that of Theorem of Kofman et al. (7a), the only difference being the presence of matrix H. In the sequel, we will equivalently express Theorem part )b)ii) as follows: If V x() S H δ(x m ), then x is ultimately bounded to the region {x : x b}. 3. Eigenvalue and Eigenvector Assignment by Feedback The following result is part of Theorem. of Kofman et al. (7b) and also part of Theorems. and.3 of Kofman et al. (). This result shows how a state-feedback matrix can be computed so that desired eigenvalues and eigenvectors are assigned to the closed-loop linear system. In addition, the result establishes how some matrices change as the desired eigenvalues are scaled according to a scaling factor µ. Theorem. Take µ > and select an eigenvalue matrix Λ µ = µ Λ = µdiag( λ,..., λ n ), where λ i C, i =,..., n, satisfy λ i λ j whenever i j, Re( λ i ) <, and if λ i / R, then either λ i = λ i or λ i+ = λ i. Select complex numbers e i,j C, i =,...,m, j =,...,n so that e i,j+ = e i,j whenever λ j+ = λ j and such that the matrix V defined as [ V,... V,n e i,j(µ λ j) (d i ) V , V. i,j., () V m,... V m,n e i,j(µ λ j) e i,j has linearly independent columns, where d i, i =,..., m, are the dimensions of A i and b i in (7) (). Define and, Then, R µ V [Re(Λ µ ) V B, (9) K µ = (B T B ) B T (V Λ µ V A ). () i) The entries of the matrix µr µ are nonincreasing functions of µ. ii) A + B K µ = V Λ µ V.. MAIN RESULTS In this section, we present the main contribution of the paper. Namely, we provide a systematic method to compute componentwise ultimate bounds for the state-feedbacklinearizable system (),(3) and a systematic control design methodology so that any desired ultimate bound is achieved in the case of matched perturbations, that is, for a closed-loop system of the form ().. Componentwise Ultimate Bound Analysis The following theorem presents sufficient conditions to ensure the ultimate boundedness of the state trajectories of a perturbed system under state-feedback linearization. This theorem also shows how to compute an ultimate bound. Theorem 3. Consider system (), where the perturbation w(t) satisfies (3). Suppose that the associated nominal system () is state-feedback-linearizable, and let z = Φ(x) be the coordinate transformation, and α(x) and β(x) be the feedback functions, so that () is transformed into () under application of the feedback law (). Let K be chosen so that A A + B K is Hurwitz, and let Λ = V AV be the (complex) Jordan canonical form of A. Consider S I, defined in (7) with H = I, and let R V S I. Define [ Φ δ(z) sup ζ: ζ z x h(x) θ(x) () x=φ (ζ) and let T(z) Rδ(z). Let U z Φ(U x ) and suppose that T(z m ) z m for some z m U z. In addition, let B m {z : V z S I δ(z m )} and suppose that B m U z. Then,
4 i) b z lim r T r (z m ) exists and if x() Φ (B m ) the trajectories of the closed-loop system (),() are ultimately bounded to the region x b sup z: V z S Iδ(b z) Φ (z). () ii) If, in addition, h(x) = g(x)γ(x) [matched perturbations, recall (), then i) above also holds if we replace S I above with S B [defined as in (7) with H = B and B as in () and δ above by δ m, defined as δ m (z) sup ζ: ζ z [ β (x)γ(x) θ(x) x=φ (ζ). (3) Proof. Defining [ Φ v(t) x h(x) w(t), () x=φ (z(t)) system () can be rewritten as ż(t) = Az(t) + v(t) (5) From (3) and (), it follows that v(t) δ(z(t)) where δ(z) verifies (5). If, in addition, h(x) = g(x)γ(x), then v(t) = B s(t) [see (), where s(t) = [ β (x)γ(x) w(t) () x=φ (z(t)) satisfies s(t) δ m (z(t)) [see (3) and δ m also verifies (5). Then, Theorem, part ) establishes the existence of b z. Next, applying Theorem, part )a) to system (5) we conclude that any trajectory starting from an initial condition z() B m does not leave the region B m U z. Moreover, it follows from Theorem, part )b)i) that z(t) is ultimately bounded to the region B z = {z : V z S I δ(b z )} B m U z. A similar argument applied to the case of matched perturbations yields that z(t) is ultimately bounded to the region B z = {z : V z S B δ m (b z )} B m U z. Taking into account that x = Φ (z) (with Φ being a diffeomorphism defined in U z ), and that z(t) cannot abandon U z, it follows that x(t) is ultimately bounded to the region B x = Φ (B z ). Then, taking b as the supremum of x in B x we obtain the ultimate bound of Eq.().. Robust control design The next theorem establishes design conditions to achieve a desired ultimate bound in a perturbed system with statefeedback-linearization under the hypothesis of matched perturbations. The result is then translated into a design algorithm that constitutes the core of the proposed systematic control design methodology. Theorem. Consider system (), where the perturbation w(t) satisfies (3). Suppose that the associated nominal system () is state-feedback-linearizable, and let z = Φ(x) be the coordinate transformation, and α(x) and β(x) be the feedback functions, so that (5) () hold. Assume also that h(x) = g(x)γ(x) (matched perturbations). Select V, Λ µ according to Theorem, calculate R µ from (9), and consider δ m as defined in (3) and T µ (z) R µ δ m (z) (7) Let z c U z, z c, be such that {z : z z c } U z. Then, i) The components of the vector µt µ (z c ) are nonincreasing functions of µ for µ >. ii) Let µ > be such that T µ (z c ) z c. Then, the feedback law () with K = K µ given by () ensures that the closed-loop system () is ultimately bounded to the region x b sup Φ (z) () z: V z S B δ m(b z) where S B and δ m are as defined in Theorem 3 ii) and b z = lim r T r µ(z c ) z c. Proof. i): the proof follows straightforwardly from Theorem i) and the fact that δ m (z) does not depend on µ. ii): Defining v(z, w) β (Φ (z))γ(φ (z))w, the closed-loop system () under matched perturbations and with K = K µ takes the form ż(t) = (A + B K µ )z(t) + B v(z(t), w(t)). (9) According to Theorem ii), A µ A +B K µ = V Λ µ V, which, since Λ µ = µdiag( λ,..., λ n ) and Re( λ i ) < ensures that A µ is Hurwitz. From (3) and (3), it follows that v(z, w) δ m (z). Also, it can be straightforwardly verified that δ m satisfies (5). Then, taking H = B and applying Theorem ii) to system (9) we conclude that any trajectory such that V z() S B δ(z c ) cannot leave the region B c = {z : V z S B δ(z c )}. Notice that B c is entirely contained in the region {z : z z c } U z and then B c U z. Then, application of Theorem 3 yields that x is ultimately bounded to the region (). Theorem i) states that the components of the vector T µ (z c ) decrease (at least inverse-linearly) with µ. Therefore, the condition T µ (z c ) z c can always be achieved through the choice of a sufficiently large value of µ. Theorem ii) can be applied in order to design matrix K in () so that the closed-loop system exhibits an arbitrary ultimate bound. The following algorithm implements this idea. Algorithm. Given a desired componentwise ultimate bound b R n +, for the state x, (i) Find the change of coordinates z = Φ(x), jointly with the feedback functions α(x) and β(x), so that (5) () are satisfied. (ii) Take z c so that z z c z U z, and, sup Φ (z) b (3) z: z z c (iii) Calculate δ m (z) according to (3). (iv) Select an arbitrary µ >, and Λ µ and V as specified in Theorem. (v) Compute R µ from (9). (vi) Evaluate T µ (z c ) according to (7). If T µ (z c ) z c, go to step (viii). (vii) Compute max i ((T µ (z c )) i /z ci ) and set the new µ equal to this value. Reevaluate V according to (). (viii) Compute K = K µ according to (). Algorithm, according to Theorem,.finds the feedback matrix K µ of the feedback law () that guarantees an ultimate bound b given by (). This bound b can be proven to be less than or equal to b (the desired ultimate bound) as follows. (T µ(z c)) i denotes the i-th component of T µ(z c). Similarly for z ci.
5 First, notice that the condition V z S B δ m (b z ) in () implies that z z c since z = V V z V V z V S B δ m (b z ) = T µ (b z ) = b z z c. Thus, the supremum of Φ ( ) on z : z z c is greater than or equal to the supremum on z : V z S B δ m (b z ). Then, comparing () and (3) it follows that b b. Remark. The design procedure begins by feedback linearizing the nonlinear plant. Then, eigenvalue/eigenvector assignment is performed, similarly to Kofman et al. (). We stress that the procedure is not just a straightforward application of the latter results since, even after feedback linearization, the perturbations exhibit nonlinear dependence on the state variables. The ultimate bound is hence estimated via the technique developed in Kofman et al. (7a), where the ultimate bound estimate is given by the fixed point of a nonlinear map instead of the simple closedform expression of Kofman et al. (). In addition, the nonlinear coordinate transformation required poses an additional problem, because relationships between bounds on the original and the linear coordinates must be computed. The contribution of this work lies precisely in providing a solution to all these problems. 5. EXAMPLES The dynamics of a synchronous generator on an infinite bus can be expressed by Eq.(), with [ f(x) = p[( + x 3 )sin (x + d) sin d q rx 3 + s[cos(x + d) cosd, g(x) = g (x) = h(x) = h (x) = [ T, where p, q, r, s, d are real parameters and where we consider a bounded perturbation term w(t) w m. The associated nominal plant () is state-feedback-linearizable. The map z = Φ(x), where [ x Φ(x) = p[( + x 3 )sin (x + d) sind q jointly with the feedback functions α(x) = p( + x 3 )cos(x + d) pq sind + q + p sin (x + d) +q( + x 3 ) + rx 3 s[cos(x + d) cosd) and β(x) = p sin(x + d), is such that (5) () are satisfied with [ [ A = A =, B = b =, for all x U x = {x : < x +d < π}. Also, U z = Φ(U x ) = {z : < z + d < π}. The goal is to design the feedback matrix K in () so that the closed-loop system (),() is ultimately bounded to the region x b = [..5. T. We consider the set of parameters p = 3.5, q =, r =.9, s =.57, d = π/, and the perturbation bound w m =.. We next follow Algorithm., Step (i) of Algorithm was performed above. At Step (ii), z c can be chosen in many ways. A possible selection is z c = [ T. (3) Note that z z c z U z. Step (iii) requires the calculation of δ m (z), according to (3), where γ(x) = and θ(x) = w m =.. This computation yields { p sin( z + d)w m if ( z + d) < π/, δ m (z) = pw m otherwise. At Step (iv) we take µ =, and propose the eigenvalue configuration Λ µ = µ diag(, 5, ). For V, we take e,j = for j =,, 3 in (). This choice yields [...5 V =...5. (3)... Step (v) yields R µ = [ T and for Step (vi) we calculate T µ (z c ) = R µ δ m (z c ) = [ T. Since the condition T µ (z c ) z c is not satisfied, we proceed with Step (vii), computing max i ((T µ (z c )) i /z ci ) =.35, setting µ =.35 and recalculating V for this new value of µ. Finally, Step (viii) gives the feedback matrix K µ = [ Theorem ensures that the ultimate bound of the closedloop system (),() with K = K µ is at least as tight as b. We can also employ () to estimate a (possibly) tighter bound. The fixed point b z of map T µ iterated from z c is b z = [ T 3, and then, using () we conclude that x(t) is bounded to b x = [ T 3. Figures and show the region defined in the state space by the bound b x and simulation results for the closed-loop trajectories with zero initial conditions and for different perturbations satisfying Eq.(). For this simulation, several sinusoidal and pulse train perturbations of different frequencies were applied. x 3 x 3 x x b x x Fig.. Ultimate bound region (dashed box) and closedloop trajectories for different perturbations. We observe from the figures that the proposed design procedure achieves relatively tight bounds under a large range of persistent perturbations. Also note from the steps carried out in this example, the systematicity of the approach and the simplicity of the computations involved.
6 x3 x x x x x x3 x x 3 Analysis in Applied Control and Automation IMAACA, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 7b. E. Kofman, M. M. Seron, and H. Haimovich. Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for perturbed systems. Automatica,. In Press. S. Oucheriah. Robust tracking and model following of uncertain dynamic delay systems by memoriless linear controllers. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, (7): 73 77, 999. W. E. Schmitendorf and B. R. Barmish. Robust asymptotic tracking for linear systems with unknown parameters. Automatica, :355 3, 9. H. Trinh and M. Aldeen. Output tracking for linear uncertain time-delay systems. IEE Proceedings, Control Theory and Applications, 3():, x x Fig.. Ultimate bound region (dashed box) and closedloop trajectories for different perturbations.. CONCLUSIONS For a class of perturbed feedback-linearizable nonlinear systems, we have presented a systematic design procedure to compute a state feedback control that ensures a prescribed ultimate bound for the closed-loop system states. The procedure utilizes a componentwise bound computation method previously introduced by the authors, and combines nonlinear state-feedback-linearizing control with linear state feedback computed via eigenstructure assignment. The proposed procedure was illustrated on an example of a synchronous generator. Future work will consider the more practical output feedback case, both for linear and nonlinear systems REFERENCES B. R. Barmish, I. R. Petersen, and A. Feuer. Linear ultimate boundedness control of uncertain dynamical systems. Automatica, 9(5):53 53, 93. Y.-Y. Cao and Y.-X. Sun. Robust stabilization of uncertain systems with time-varying multistate delay. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 3():, 99. H. Haimovich. Quantisation issues in feedback control. PhD thesis, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Newcastle, Australia, March. URL haimo. Alberto Isidori. Nonlinear Control Systems. Springer, London, 3rd edition, 995. H. Khalil. Nonlinear Systems. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 3rd edition,. E. Kofman. Non conservative ultimate bound estimation in LTI perturbed systems. Automatica, ():35 3, 5. E. Kofman, H. Haimovich, and M. M. Seron. A systematic method to obtain ultimate bounds for perturbed systems. International Journal of Control, ():7 7, 7a. E. Kofman, M.M. Seron, and H. Haimovich. Robust control design with guaranteed state ultimate bound. In 3rd International Conference on Integrated Modeling and
Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for perturbed systems
Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for perturbed systems Ernesto Kofman a,1 María M Seron b Hernan Haimovich a a CONICET; Departamento de Electrónica, Facultad de Cs Ex, Ing y Agrim, Universidad
More informationDisturbance Decoupling Problem
DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 21 1 Disturbance Decoupling Problem Lecture 4 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 7 The disturbance decoupling problem is a typical example
More informationLevel Crossing Sampling in Feedback Stabilization under Data-Rate Constraints
Level Crossing Sampling in Feedback Stabilization under Data-Rate Constraints Ernesto Kofman and Julio H. Braslavsky ARC Centre for Complex Dynamic Systems and Control The University of Newcastle Callaghan,
More informationFeedback Linearization
Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, 2015 1 Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2)
More informationOutput Feedback and State Feedback. EL2620 Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Observers. Nonlinear Controllers. ẋ = f(x,u), y = h(x)
Output Feedback and State Feedback EL2620 Nonlinear Control Lecture 10 Exact feedback linearization Input-output linearization Lyapunov-based control design methods ẋ = f(x,u) y = h(x) Output feedback:
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 7. Feedback Linearization IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs1/ 1 1 Feedback Linearization Given a nonlinear
More informationRobust feedback linearization
Robust eedback linearization Hervé Guillard Henri Bourlès Laboratoire d Automatique des Arts et Métiers CNAM/ENSAM 21 rue Pinel 75013 Paris France {herveguillardhenribourles}@parisensamr Keywords: Nonlinear
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems
p. 1/5 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 2/5 Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t, x) f(t, x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationControl design using Jordan controllable canonical form
Control design using Jordan controllable canonical form Krishna K Busawon School of Engineering, Ellison Building, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK email: krishnabusawon@unnacuk
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 2 Separation Principle
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 2 Separation Principle High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 2Separation Principle p. 1/4 The Class of Systems ẋ = Ax + Bφ(x,
More informationLyapunov Stability Theory
Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous
More informationSemi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback
2005 American Control Conference June 8-10, 2005. Portland, OR, USA FrC17.5 Semi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback Weiyao Lan, Zhiyong Chen and Jie
More informationA new method to obtain ultimate bounds and convergence rates for perturbed time-delay systems
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBUST AND NONLINEAR ONTROL Int. J. Robust. Nonlinear ontrol 212; 22:187 188 ublished online 21 September 211 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com)..179 SHORT OMMUNIATION
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More informationEvent-based control of input-output linearizable systems
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Event-based control of input-output linearizable systems Christian Stöcker Jan Lunze Institute of Automation and Computer Control, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr.
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationAdaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 0, OCTOBER 003 87 Adaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization Zhihua Qu Abstract Two classes of partially known
More informationModeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems
Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Dr. Guillaume Ducard Fall 2017 Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control ETH Zurich, Switzerland G. Ducard c 1 / 57 Outline 1 Lecture 13: Linear System - Stability
More informationNonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 19 Perturbed Systems & Input-to-State Stability
p. 1/1 Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 19 Perturbed Systems & Input-to-State Stability p. 2/1 Perturbed Systems: Nonvanishing Perturbation Nominal System: Perturbed System: ẋ = f(x), f(0) = 0 ẋ
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationObserver-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Observer-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory,
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 0.1 Model prerequisites Consider ẋ = f(t, x). We will make the following basic assumptions
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationA Simple Self-triggered Sampler for Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 4th IFAC Conference on Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems ADHS 12 June 6-8, 212. A Simple Self-triggered Sampler for Nonlinear Systems U. Tiberi, K.H. Johansson, ACCESS Linnaeus Center,
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL
International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST),Vol., No., March 01 OUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
More informationOutput Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System
Vol. 0, No. 05, 00, 60-608 Output Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan R & D Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi-Alamathi Road, Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationL 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 WeB1.1 L 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown Dimension
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationOutput Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationApproximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control
Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 Approximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and George A. Rovithakis Department of Electrical
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More informationIMPROVED MPC DESIGN BASED ON SATURATING CONTROL LAWS
IMPROVED MPC DESIGN BASED ON SATURATING CONTROL LAWS D. Limon, J.M. Gomes da Silva Jr., T. Alamo and E.F. Camacho Dpto. de Ingenieria de Sistemas y Automática. Universidad de Sevilla Camino de los Descubrimientos
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationA small-gain type stability criterion for large scale networks of ISS systems
A small-gain type stability criterion for large scale networks of ISS systems Sergey Dashkovskiy Björn Sebastian Rüffer Fabian R. Wirth Abstract We provide a generalized version of the nonlinear small-gain
More informationBIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY
BIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY FRANCESCO NORI Abstract. In this report with discuss the concepts of bounded-input boundedoutput stability (BIBO) and of Lyapunov stability. Examples are given to
More informationMCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory
MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory Reading: SHV Appendix Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE503 p.1/17 Stability in the sense of Lyapunov A
More informationOutput Regulation of the Tigan System
Output Regulation of the Tigan System Dr. V. Sundarapandian Professor (Systems & Control Eng.), Research and Development Centre Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-6 6, Tamil Nadu,
More informationA Systematic Approach to Extremum Seeking Based on Parameter Estimation
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 21 Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA A Systematic Approach to Extremum Seeking Based on Parameter Estimation Dragan Nešić, Alireza Mohammadi
More informationEffects of time quantization and noise in level crossing sampling stabilization
Effects of time quantization and noise in level crossing sampling stabilization Julio H. Braslavsky Ernesto Kofman Flavia Felicioni ARC Centre for Complex Dynamic Systems and Control The University of
More informationSet-based adaptive estimation for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters
Preprints of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes The International Federation of Automatic Control Furama Riverfront, Singapore, July -3, Set-based adaptive estimation for
More informationThe norms can also be characterized in terms of Riccati inequalities.
9 Analysis of stability and H norms Consider the causal, linear, time-invariant system ẋ(t = Ax(t + Bu(t y(t = Cx(t Denote the transfer function G(s := C (si A 1 B. Theorem 85 The following statements
More informationDelay-independent stability via a reset loop
Delay-independent stability via a reset loop S. Tarbouriech & L. Zaccarian (LAAS-CNRS) Joint work with F. Perez Rubio & A. Banos (Universidad de Murcia) L2S Paris, 20-22 November 2012 L2S Paris, 20-22
More information1 Relative degree and local normal forms
THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a
More informationMCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems
MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems Systems of Differential Equations Phase Plane Analysis Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Systems of Nonlinear
More informationEvent-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems
Event-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems Pavankumar Tallapragada Nikhil Chopra Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 2742 MD,
More informationConstrained controllability of semilinear systems with delayed controls
BULLETIN OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES TECHNICAL SCIENCES Vol. 56, No. 4, 28 Constrained controllability of semilinear systems with delayed controls J. KLAMKA Institute of Control Engineering, Silesian
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationQuasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, P.R. China, December 16-18, 2009 FrA11.5 Quasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
More informationOutput feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control
Output feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control Georgia Kaliora, Zhong-Ping Jiang and Alessandro Astolfi Abstract In this note we discuss the problems of
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationSolution of Additional Exercises for Chapter 4
1 1. (1) Try V (x) = 1 (x 1 + x ). Solution of Additional Exercises for Chapter 4 V (x) = x 1 ( x 1 + x ) x = x 1 x + x 1 x In the neighborhood of the origin, the term (x 1 + x ) dominates. Hence, the
More informationOn Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems
On Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems Bao-Zhu Guo 1, Zhi-Liang Zhao 2, 1 Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Academia Sinica, Beijing, 100190, China E-mail:
More informationINRIA Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay Cedex (France) y Dept. of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC USA
Nonlinear Observer Design using Implicit System Descriptions D. von Wissel, R. Nikoukhah, S. L. Campbell y and F. Delebecque INRIA Rocquencourt, 78 Le Chesnay Cedex (France) y Dept. of Mathematics, North
More informationLow Gain Feedback. Properties, Design Methods and Applications. Zongli Lin. July 28, The 32nd Chinese Control Conference
Low Gain Feedback Properties, Design Methods and Applications Zongli Lin University of Virginia Shanghai Jiao Tong University The 32nd Chinese Control Conference July 28, 213 Outline A review of high gain
More informationNonlinear Control Design for Linear Differential Inclusions via Convex Hull Quadratic Lyapunov Functions
Nonlinear Control Design for Linear Differential Inclusions via Convex Hull Quadratic Lyapunov Functions Tingshu Hu Abstract This paper presents a nonlinear control design method for robust stabilization
More informationOn Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems
On Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems arxiv:1206.4240v1 [math.oc] 19 Jun 2012 P. Pepe Abstract In this paper input-to-state practically stabilizing
More informationIntroduction to Geometric Control
Introduction to Geometric Control Relative Degree Consider the square (no of inputs = no of outputs = p) affine control system ẋ = f(x) + g(x)u = f(x) + [ g (x),, g p (x) ] u () h (x) y = h(x) = (2) h
More informationA Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control
A Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control Fernando A. C. C. Fontes 1 and Lalo Magni 2 1 Officina Mathematica, Departamento de Matemática para a Ciência e
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 8 Time Varying and Perturbed Systems
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 8 Time Varying and Perturbed Systems Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t,x) f(t,x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t 0 and all x D, (0 D). The origin
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization
Nonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2011 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 9 1/75
More informationRow and Column Representatives in Qualitative Analysis of Arbitrary Switching Positive Systems
ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Volume 19, Numbers 1-2, 2016, 127 136 Row and Column Representatives in Qualitative Analysis of Arbitrary Switching Positive Systems Octavian PASTRAVANU,
More informationACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationLecture 4. Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability. Eugenio Schuster. Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University.
Lecture 4 Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 4 p. 1/86 Autonomous Systems Consider the autonomous system ẋ
More informationMCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II
MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II Reading: SHV Ch.8 Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE647 p.1/14 Robust vs. Adaptive
More informationAutonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective
Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio State University
More informationStabilization and Passivity-Based Control
DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationEE363 homework 8 solutions
EE363 Prof. S. Boyd EE363 homework 8 solutions 1. Lyapunov condition for passivity. The system described by ẋ = f(x, u), y = g(x), x() =, with u(t), y(t) R m, is said to be passive if t u(τ) T y(τ) dτ
More informationMultiobjective Optimization Applied to Robust H 2 /H State-feedback Control Synthesis
Multiobjective Optimization Applied to Robust H 2 /H State-feedback Control Synthesis Eduardo N. Gonçalves, Reinaldo M. Palhares, and Ricardo H. C. Takahashi Abstract This paper presents an algorithm for
More informationMCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems
MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems Input-Output and Input-State Linearization Zero Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University
More informationStability Analysis Through the Direct Method of Lyapunov in the Oscillation of a Synchronous Machine
Modern Applied Science; Vol. 12, No. 7; 2018 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Stability Analysis Through the Direct Method of Lyapunov in the Oscillation
More informationMathematics for Control Theory
Mathematics for Control Theory Geometric Concepts in Control Involutivity and Frobenius Theorem Exact Linearization Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Reading materials
More informationExact Linearization Of Stochastic Dynamical Systems By State Space Coordinate Transformation And Feedback I g-linearization
Applied Mathematics E-Notes, 3(2003), 99-106 c ISSN 1607-2510 Available free at mirror sites of http://www.math.nthu.edu.tw/ amen/ Exact Linearization Of Stochastic Dynamical Systems By State Space Coordinate
More informationUSING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS TO GENERATE CHAOS: AN INVERSE OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 11, No. 3 (2001) 857 863 c World Scientific Publishing Company USING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS TO GENERATE CHAOS: AN INVERSE OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH
More informationNORMS ON SPACE OF MATRICES
NORMS ON SPACE OF MATRICES. Operator Norms on Space of linear maps Let A be an n n real matrix and x 0 be a vector in R n. We would like to use the Picard iteration method to solve for the following system
More informationRobust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form
Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationStabilization for a Class of Nonlinear Systems: A Fuzzy Logic Approach
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-11, 8 Stabilization for a Class of Nonlinear Systems: A Fuzzy Logic Approach Bernardino Castillo
More informationStabilization of Higher Periodic Orbits of Discrete-time Chaotic Systems
ISSN 749-3889 (print), 749-3897 (online) International Journal of Nonlinear Science Vol.4(27) No.2,pp.8-26 Stabilization of Higher Periodic Orbits of Discrete-time Chaotic Systems Guoliang Cai, Weihuai
More informationROBUST CONSTRAINED REGULATORS FOR UNCERTAIN LINEAR SYSTEMS
ROBUST CONSTRAINED REGULATORS FOR UNCERTAIN LINEAR SYSTEMS Jean-Claude HENNET Eugênio B. CASTELAN Abstract The purpose of this paper is to combine several control requirements in the same regulator design
More informationConvergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems
Convergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems Philippe JOUAN and Saïd NACIRI arxiv:1511.01737v1 [math.oc] 5 Nov 2015 January 23, 2018 Abstract This paper is concerned with the convergence rate of the
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationStability Theory for Nonnegative and Compartmental Dynamical Systems with Time Delay
1 Stability Theory for Nonnegative and Compartmental Dynamical Systems with Time Delay Wassim M. Haddad and VijaySekhar Chellaboina School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
More informationFloor Control (kn) Time (sec) Floor 5. Displacement (mm) Time (sec) Floor 5.
DECENTRALIZED ROBUST H CONTROL OF MECHANICAL STRUCTURES. Introduction L. Bakule and J. Böhm Institute of Information Theory and Automation Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic The results contributed
More informationAn Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems
,,, 323 E-mail: mxsun@zjut.edu.cn :, Lyapunov( ),,.,,,.,,. :,,, An Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems Mingxuan Sun, Chaonan Jiang, Yanwei Li College of Information Engineering,
More information21 Linear State-Space Representations
ME 132, Spring 25, UC Berkeley, A Packard 187 21 Linear State-Space Representations First, let s describe the most general type of dynamic system that we will consider/encounter in this class Systems may
More informationChapter III. Stability of Linear Systems
1 Chapter III Stability of Linear Systems 1. Stability and state transition matrix 2. Time-varying (non-autonomous) systems 3. Time-invariant systems 1 STABILITY AND STATE TRANSITION MATRIX 2 In this chapter,
More informationNon-linear sliding surface: towards high performance robust control
Techset Composition Ltd, Salisbury Doc: {IEE}CTA/Articles/Pagination/CTA20100727.3d www.ietdl.org Published in IET Control Theory and Applications Received on 8th December 2010 Revised on 21st May 2011
More informationFINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez
FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES Danlei Chu Tongwen Chen Horacio J Marquez Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton
More informationOn linear quadratic optimal control of linear time-varying singular systems
On linear quadratic optimal control of linear time-varying singular systems Chi-Jo Wang Department of Electrical Engineering Southern Taiwan University of Technology 1 Nan-Tai Street, Yungkung, Tainan
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationEE363 homework 7 solutions
EE363 Prof. S. Boyd EE363 homework 7 solutions 1. Gain margin for a linear quadratic regulator. Let K be the optimal state feedback gain for the LQR problem with system ẋ = Ax + Bu, state cost matrix Q,
More informationPostface to Model Predictive Control: Theory and Design
Postface to Model Predictive Control: Theory and Design J. B. Rawlings and D. Q. Mayne August 19, 2012 The goal of this postface is to point out and comment upon recent MPC papers and issues pertaining
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More information