FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS
|
|
- Silas Stephens
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 271 FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS Eduardo J. Adam * and Jacinto L. Marchetti Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET) Güemes Santa Fe Argentina. s: eadam@intec.unl.edu.ar, jlmach@.ceride.gov.ar Abstract. This paper presents a model based design and adjustment procedure or eedorward controllers that accounts or model uncertainties. It also analyses relevant properties o the eedorward-eedback structure and proposes a combined design method using robust control concepts in the requency domain. This approach allows the inspection o the perormance limits achievable or each particular application. The beneits o the suggested approach are discussed and illustrated through an application example. Keywords: eedorward controller, model-based control, H design. 1. Introduction There are many examples rom dierent engineering areas where an input disturbance has a strong eect on the controlled variable. Classic methods or tuning eedback controllers like Ziegler and Nichols (1942) among others have been used per decades. However, the level o perormance obtained in set-point changes is not always reached in disturbance rejections. Moreover, the combined eedorward-eedback control scheme considers simultaneously both the set-point tracking and the regulation problems. The use o this combined control is usually very common in the process industry: it can be ound in distillation columns (Rix et al., 1997), power plants (Weng and Ray, 1997; Mcaburn and Hughes, 1997), continuous reactors, among other examples. In spite o this, the synthesis o eedorward controllers has not received much attention. Consequently, the eedorward controller design and adjustment still ollows classic approaches (Seborg et al., 1989; Stephanopoulos, 1984). In this work, a method based on H design concepts is proposed which complements the classic design by providing a rational procedure to achieving a realizable controller transer unction. In order to present systematically this work, Section 2 gives the preliminary concepts related to eedorward-eedback control, Section 3 presents main theoretical undaments and includes an application example that reveals the capabilities o the proposed design technique. Finally, in Section 4, the conclusions are presented. 2. Feedorward-Feedback Control Let us start by analyzing the classical eedorward-eedback structure where linear representations with uncertain parameters are assumed or the process system. * To whom all correspondence should be addressed
2 272 Figure 1 shows an sketch o the combined control system where c(s) is the eedback controller, c (s) is the eedorward controller, p d (s) stands or the transer unction between the output y(s) and the exogenous disturbance d(s) and, p(s) is the transer unction between the output and the manipulated variable u(s). From this representation it is clear that p d (s) and p(s) are lineal time invariants (LTI) models representing the real plant. d( s) pd( s) c s ( ) d2( s) rs ( ) w( s) - u( s) c( s) - p( s) d1( s) y( s) Plant Fig. 1. Schematic representation o a eedorward-eedback control scheme. When the eedorward controller is implemented alone, the disturbance eect on the output variable is written as ys ( ) = pd( s) c ( sps ) ( ) ds ( ) (1) but in case that a eedback loop is also used, pd( s) c ( s) p( s) ys ( ) = ds ( ) (2) 1 + pscs ( ) ( ) In both cases, the optimal eedorward controller that minimizes pd c p is, 2 pd() s c() s = (3) ps () and it would lead to preect disturbance compensation in both cases i the c (s) is realizable. However, the expression (3) might result in an improper or unstable transer unction; when this happens c (s) should be chosen such to minimize the eect o the disturbance on the controlled variable Properties o the Feedorward-Feedback Control System Let us assume inputs d(t) and r(t) are bounded signals, i.e., d(t), r(t) L 2 [0, ), where L 2 [0, ) stands or any continuous signals on [0,) that have inite 2-norm (Green and Limebeer, 1995). Deinition 1 (Perect Disturbance Rejection). Feedorward control allows perect disturbance rejection when the controlled variable does not change as consequence o any bounded input disturbance, i.e., yt () = 0 t 0or dt () L2[0, ) and r(t) = 0. (4)
3 273 Equation (4) assumes the output variable y(t) is deined as a deviation rom the steady-state value. Note that, eedorward control allows the possibility o perect disturbance rejection while; this is not possible using eedback control neither or regulation nor or tracking problems (Morari and Zairou, 1989). In order to analyze the internal stability o the combined eedorward-eedback control system the ollowing deinition is introduced: Deinition 2 (Internal Stability o the Combined Control System). The system sketched in Fig. 2 is internally stable i the elements o the transer matrix S( pd c p) Scp Sc( pd c p) Sc M = with S : = 1/(1 + cp) (5) pd 0 c 0 rom [d r] T to [y w d 1 d 2 ] T belong to RH, or all bounded d(t) and r(t). Note that requiring internal stability to the eedback loop is not suicient or the combined system. To make sure internal stability it is also necessary that c (s) and p d (s) being stable plants. Furthermore, i this condition is satisied the internal stability o the eedback loop is not aected since; (i) all the input signals to the eedback loop are bounded and (ii) the eedorward controller is not included in the characteristic equation. In order to generalize the analysis, let us assume that this plant can be described by two amilies o models which are deined using the classic multiplicative uncertainty, p p0 Π u : = p: lmu : = lmu( ω), (6) p0 pd pd0 Π d : = pd : lmd : = lmd( ω). (7) pd0 Π u and Π d stand or the amilies, lmu( ω ) and lmd( ω ) are the upper bounds or the multiplicative uncertainty modulus lmu( jω ) and lmd( jω ) respectively. Thus, any member o the amilies o plants Π u and Π d can be represented as ps () = p0 ()(1 s + lmu()) s and pd() s = pd0 ()(1 s + lmd()) s respectively and, p 0 (s) and p d0 (s) are the nominal plants according to the designations in Fig. 1. Then, using the sensitivity unction S = 1/(1 + cp) and substituting p(s) and p d (s) in the expression (2) gives, ys () Ss (){ pd0()1 s[ lmd() s] c sp0()1 s[ lmu() s] } d() s = + +. (8) Based on the right side o this expression, a unctional denoted I is deined as ollows: [ ] [ ] I (): s = p ()1 s + lm () s c () s p ()1 s + lm () s. (9) d 0 d 0 u Note that i, S I γ or all 0 ω < then, according to previous deinition and Eqn. (2), it ensures that, y γ d( jω). It is important to remark that, i) S(s) does not depend o eedorward controller parameters and, ii) an acceptable disturbance attenuation in the output variable is reached i γ << 1. That
4 274 is, the appropriate design o both eedorward and eedback controllers should be such that a γ << 1 be reached. Furthermore, according to the comments ollowing to deinition 2, c(s) should assure stability o the eedback loop and c (s) should be stable. I the nominal plant satisies the perormance objectives, the system reaches the nominal perormance. This idea can be expressed or the eedorward-eedback control loop based on the expression (2) as, WSI p 0 0 1, where denotes the H ininity norm based on the classical deinition, S 0 is the nominal sensitivity unction deined as S 0 : = 1/(1 + cp 0 ), I 0 : = pd 0 c p0 and W p is a weight o the input signal included or a more general ormulation. On the other hand, S I γ is a robust perormance condition or the eedorward-eedback control system i the parameter γ is chosen less than one and the closedloop system is robustly stable. This condition can be ormalized as ollows, WSI p 1. Lemma 1. Let p(s) and p d (s) be plants that belong to the amilies (6) and (7) respectively, then, the eedorward-eedback control system reaches robust perormance i the ollowing condition is satisied: W ( j ω) S ( j ω) I ( j ω) + T ( j ω) lm ( j ω) 1 0 ω <. (10) p 0 0 The proo, given in Adam and Marchetti (2001), starts rom the condition WSI p 1 and consequently each element o the set (6) and (7) satisies Eqn. (10). 3. Feedorward Controller Design 3.1. The Standard Design Problem The eedorward controller can be synthesized according to the ollowing equation: c0 () s = { pd0( s)/ p0( s) } *, (11) where p d0 (s) and p 0 (s) are nominal transer unctions and {} * denotes a polynomial ratio such that it does not include: i) the zeros o p 0 (s) that belong to let hand side plane, ii) the unstable poles o p d0 (s) and iii) positive time delay that might result rom the dierence θ d0 (s) - θ 0 (s) where, θ d0 (s) and θ 0 (s) are the nominal plant delays o p d0 (s) and p 0 (s) respectively. The operation indicated in (11) gives a stable transer unction, in spite o p d0 (s) could be unstable and p 0 (s) could have right hal zeros, but in many cases a non realizable transer unction could result. Hence, a ilter is included in order to obtain realizability. This gives c ( s) = c 0 ( s) ( s), (12) where the ilter is deined as ollows: Deinition 3 (Feedorward Filter). The eedorward ilter (s) is chosen as a rational transer unction, K (): s =, (13) n ( λ s+ 1) with n = δ(ro) pd 0( s)/ p0( s). The unction δ is deined as, δ = δ( RO) : = 1 i RO p d 0( s )/ p 0( s ) < 0 or δ = δ( RO) : = 0 i RO p d 0( s )/ p 0( s ) 0 and, RO[ ] is an operator that computes the relative order o the
5 275 polynomial ratio contained inside the brackets. In other words, it gives the dierence between the denominator polynomial order and the numerator polynomial order Proposed Design Technique Since, c (s) has the gain and the ilter time constant as adjusting parameters, the ollowing optimization problem in the requency domain is proposed: min S I 0 ω < (14) K, λ s.t., K > 0 and λ Example Consider the boiler with natural recirculation modeled by Adam and Marchetti (1999). Adam (1996) demonstrates that or the operative conditions the non-linear dynamic model between level drum and the eed-water can be satisactorily modeled by the linear expression 4 6.1s p0 ( s) = e / s(5.72s + 1). Similarly, the transer unction between the level drum 4 and the steam load is pd 0 ( s) = (75.49s 1) / s(6.88s + 1). According to the eedorward controller design proposed in this paper c ( s ) = K (75.49 s 1) /( λ s + 1). (15) Furthermore, using the extreme plant concept, it is possible to deine the multiplicative uncertainties lm u (s) and lm d (s) according to Eqn. (6) and (7). Thus, any plant ps Π ( ) or u p d() s Π d is included in the Nyquist plane inside the extreme plants s 5 ps ( ) = e / s (1.55 s + 1) or p s d() s = p d0 () s e respectively. Figure 2 shows the S I ( jω ) when a PI eedback controller tuned by the TL method (Tyreus and Luyben, 1992) is used (Adam, 1996). Applying the optimization problem proposed in Section 3, the optimal parameters or the eedorward ilter are 5 K ot = 2.22 and λ = 3.11 and, SI = at requency ω = Figure 3 compares the level control perormance reached when the eedback and the combined scheme are used. For the last case, two eedorward controller are studied, the irst one is tuned by the proposed method and the other one is tuned as a static eedorward controller calculated or s = 0, according to classic textbook. In every case, a PI eedback controller tuned by the TL method was adopted. Clearly, it is observed the improvement reached on the controlled variable when the proposed eedorward controller is used in comparison with the other cases.
6 Sj ( ω) I Frequency (rad/sec.) Fig. 2. S I ( jω ) using the PI controller tuned by TL method. 4. Conclusions Fig. 3. Level control using the eedback and eedorward-eedback with static and proposed eedorward controllers. In this work, a study o the eedorward-eedback control coniguration is presented. Under the ramework o the robust control theory, a method is proposed to achieve the realizable eedorward controller by including o a low pass ilter. The adjustment o this ilter is done by a minimization o an objective unctional in the requency domain and based on H design concepts that take into account the model uncertainties. Reerences Adam E. J. (1996). Modelado, Simulación y Control de Generadores de Vapor. Doctoral Thesis, Facultad de Ingeniería Química Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Adam E. J. and Marchetti J. L. (1999). Dynamic Simulation o Large Boilers with Natural Recirculation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23, Adam E. J. and Marchetti J. L. (2001). Diseño de Controladores Feedorward Basándose en Propiedades de Robustez. Submited to RPIC Green M. and Limebeer D. J. N. (1995). Linear Robust Control. Prentice Hall, Inc.. Mcaburn A. and Hughes F. M. (1997). Feedorward Control o Solar Thermal Power Plants. Journal o Solar Energy Engineering, 119, Morari M. and Zairiou E. (1989). Robust Process Control, Prentice Hall, Inc.. Rix A., Löwe K. and Gelbe H. (1997). Feedorward Control o a Binary High Purity Distillation Column. Chem. Eng. Comum., 159, Seborg D. E., Edgar T. F. and Mellichamp D. A. (1989). Process Dynamics and Control. John Wile & Sons New York. Stephanopoulos G. (1984). Chemical Process Control an Introduction to Theory and Practice. Prentice- Hall. Tyreus B. D. and Luyben W. L. (1992). Tuning PI Controllers or Integrator / Dead Time Processes. Chem. Res, 31, Weng C-K. and Ray A. (1997). Robust Wide-Range Control o Stean-Electric Power Plants. IEEE Transaction on Control Systems Technology, 5, 1, Ziegler J. B. and Nichols N. B. (1942 ). Optimum Settings or Automatic Controllers. Trans. ASME, 64, 11,
MULTILOOP CONTROL APPLIED TO INTEGRATOR MIMO. PROCESSES. A Preliminary Study
MULTILOOP CONTROL APPLIED TO INTEGRATOR MIMO PROCESSES. A Preliminary Study Eduardo J. Adam 1,2*, Carlos J. Valsecchi 2 1 Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) (Universidad
More informationROBUST STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF UNSTABLE PROCESS WITH DEAD TIME USING Mu SYNTHESIS
ROBUST STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF UNSTABLE PROCESS WITH DEAD TIME USING Mu SYNTHESIS I. Thirunavukkarasu 1, V. I. George 1, G. Saravana Kumar 1 and A. Ramakalyan 2 1 Department o Instrumentation
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steady-state Steady-state errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationRobust feedback linearization
Robust eedback linearization Hervé Guillard Henri Bourlès Laboratoire d Automatique des Arts et Métiers CNAM/ENSAM 21 rue Pinel 75013 Paris France {herveguillardhenribourles}@parisensamr Keywords: Nonlinear
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationRobust QFT-based PI controller for a feedforward control scheme
Integral-Derivative Control, Ghent, Belgium, May 9-11, 218 ThAT4.4 Robust QFT-based PI controller for a feedforward control scheme Ángeles Hoyo José Carlos Moreno José Luis Guzmán Tore Hägglund Dep. of
More informationA NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN
Copyright 2002 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN Chyi Hwang,1 Chun-Yen Hsiao Department of Chemical Engineering National
More informationPD controller for second order unstable systems with time-delay
Automático, AMCA 215, 43 PD controller for second order unstable systems with time-delay David F. Novella Rodriguez Basilio del Muro Cuéllar Juan Fransisco Márquez Rubio Martin Velasco-Villa Escuela Superior
More informationAADECA 2006 XXº Congreso Argentino de Control Automático ITERATIVE LEARNING CONTROL APPLIED TO NONLINEAR BATCH REACTOR E.J.
ITERATIVE LEARNING CONTROL APPLIED TO NONLINEAR BATCH REACTOR E.J. ADAM (1) Institute of Technological Development for the Chemical Industry (INTEC), CONICET Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL). Güemes
More informationFeedback Linearization
Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, 2015 1 Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2)
More informationIMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration
Computers and Chemical Engineering 28 (2004) 281 290 IMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration Ibrahim Kaya Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
More informationIan G. Horn, Jeffery R. Arulandu, Christopher J. Gombas, Jeremy G. VanAntwerp, and Richard D. Braatz*
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 996, 35, 3437-344 3437 PROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL Improved Filter Design in Internal Model Control Ian G. Horn, Jeffery R. Arulandu, Christopher J. Gombas, Jeremy G. VanAntwerp, and
More informationH-Infinity Controller Design for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor
International Journal of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. ISSN 974-2174 Volume 7, Number 8 (214), pp. 767-772 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com H-Infinity Controller
More informationChapter 7 - Solved Problems
Chapter 7 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 7.1. A continuous time system has transfer function G o (s) given by G o (s) = B o(s) A o (s) = 2 (s 1)(s + 2) = 2 s 2 + s 2 (1) Find a controller of minimal
More informationGIMC-based Fault Detection and Its Application to Magnetic Suspension System
Proceedings o the 7th World Congress The International Federation o Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, Jul 6-, 28 GIC-based Fault Detection and Its Application to agnetic Suspension Sstem Yujiro Nakaso Toru
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 2002-2003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More informationECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27
1/27 ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability Feedback System Consider the feedback system u + G ol (s) y Figure 1: A unity feedback system
More informationA Systematic Approach to Frequency Compensation of the Voltage Loop in Boost PFC Pre- regulators.
A Systematic Approach to Frequency Compensation o the Voltage Loop in oost PFC Pre- regulators. Claudio Adragna, STMicroelectronics, Italy Abstract Venable s -actor method is a systematic procedure that
More informationRobust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming
Robust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming Gorka Galdos, Alireza Karimi and Roland Longchamp Abstract A quadratic programming approach is proposed to tune fixed-order
More information( x) f = where P and Q are polynomials.
9.8 Graphing Rational Functions Lets begin with a deinition. Deinition: Rational Function A rational unction is a unction o the orm ( ) ( ) ( ) P where P and Q are polynomials. Q An eample o a simple rational
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Basic Feedback Analysis & Design
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Basic Feedback Analysis & Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Routh s Stability
More informationCHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING
When I complete this chapter, I want to be able to do the following. Determine the stability of a process without control Determine the stability of a closed-loop feedback control system Use these approaches
More informationRELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationStrong Lyapunov Functions for Systems Satisfying the Conditions of La Salle
06 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 49, NO. 6, JUNE 004 Strong Lyapunov Functions or Systems Satisying the Conditions o La Salle Frédéric Mazenc and Dragan Ne sić Abstract We present a construction
More informationCascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)
Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 213, 1 (4): 16-23, ISSN: 2328-4595 (PRINT), ISSN: 2328-469 (ONLINE) Research Article Cascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) 16 A. O. Ahmed
More informationTHE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS FOR MIMO TD PLANTS WITH THE SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information Control ICIC International c 218 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 14, Number 2, April 218 pp. 387 43 THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD
More informationA DESIGN METHOD FOR SIMPLE REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS WITH SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information Control ICIC International c 202 ISSN 349-498 Volume 8, Number 7(A), July 202 pp. 4883 4899 A DESIGN METHOD FOR SIMPLE REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS
More informationRobust Residual Selection for Fault Detection
Robust Residual Selection or Fault Detection Hamed Khorasgani*, Daniel E Jung**, Gautam Biswas*, Erik Frisk**, and Mattias Krysander** Abstract A number o residual generation methods have been developed
More informationThe parameterization of all. of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers
The parameterization stabilizing controllers 89 The parameterization of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada 2, Yuko Tatsumi 3, Non-members ABSTRACT
More informationRobust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering ; (): -7 DOI:.59/j.control.. Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems M. M. Share Pasandand *, H. D. Taghirad Department
More informationThe loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)
Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)
More informationLecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control
ME 233, UC Berkeley, Spring 2014 Xu Chen Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control Big picture review of integral control in PID design example: 0 Es) C s) Ds) + + P s) Y s) where P s)
More informationDesign and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes
Design and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes Emmanuel Edet Technology and Innovation Centre University of Strathclyde 99 George Street Glasgow, United Kingdom emmanuel.edet@strath.ac.uk
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationA Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants
00 ECTI TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY VOL., NO.2 NOVEMBER 2005 A Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants Kou Yamada Nobuaki Matsushima, Non-members
More information9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design
9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design In some feedback schemes we have additional degrees-offreedom outside the feedback path. For example, feed forwarding known disturbance signals or reference signals. In
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationSystems & Signals 315
1 / 15 Systems & Signals 315 Lecture 13: Signals and Linear Systems Dr. Herman A. Engelbrecht Stellenbosch University Dept. E & E Engineering 2 Maart 2009 Outline 2 / 15 1 Signal Transmission through a
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationISA-PID Controller Tuning: A combined min-max / ISE approach
Proceedings of the 26 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Munich, Germany, October 4-6, 26 FrB11.2 ISA-PID Controller Tuning: A combined min-max / ISE approach Ramon Vilanova, Pedro Balaguer
More informationRobust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization
Robust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Alireza Karimi, Gorka Galdos and Roland Longchamp Abstract A new approach for robust fixed-order H controller design by
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationQFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
45-E-PSS-75 QFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi, Roozbeh Izadi-Zamanabadi Department of Control Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark Correspondence
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More informationA new Control Strategy for Trajectory Tracking of Fire Rescue Turntable Ladders
Proceedings o the 17th World Congress The International Federation o Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-11, 28 A new Control Strategy or Trajectory Tracking o Fire Rescue Turntable Ladders N. Zimmert,
More informationUnit 11 - Week 7: Quantitative feedback theory (Part 1/2)
X reviewer3@nptel.iitm.ac.in Courses» Control System Design Announcements Course Ask a Question Progress Mentor FAQ Unit 11 - Week 7: Quantitative feedback theory (Part 1/2) Course outline How to access
More informationStability of Operational amplifiers
Stability o Operational ampliiers Willy Sansen KULeuven, ESAT-MICAS Leuven, Belgium willy.sansen@esat.kuleuven.be Willy Sansen 0-05 05 Table o contents Use o operational ampliiers Stability o 2-stage opamp
More informationCourse Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.
Course Summary Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Unit 3: Time Response Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction Unit 5: Stability Unit 6: Steady-State Error Unit 7: Root Locus Techniques
More informationECE 388 Automatic Control
Lead Compensator and PID Control Associate Prof. Dr. of Mechatronics Engineeering Çankaya University Compulsory Course in Electronic and Communication Engineering Credits (2/2/3) Course Webpage: http://ece388.cankaya.edu.tr
More informationENSC327 Communications Systems 2: Fourier Representations. School of Engineering Science Simon Fraser University
ENSC37 Communications Systems : Fourier Representations School o Engineering Science Simon Fraser University Outline Chap..5: Signal Classiications Fourier Transorm Dirac Delta Function Unit Impulse Fourier
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationAnalog Computing Technique
Analog Computing Technique by obert Paz Chapter Programming Principles and Techniques. Analog Computers and Simulation An analog computer can be used to solve various types o problems. It solves them in
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #14 Wednesday, February 5, 2003 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Chapter 7 Synthesis of SISO Controllers
More informationClosed Loop Identification Of A First Order Plus Dead Time Process Model Under PI Control
Dublin Institute of Technology RROW@DIT Conference papers School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering -6- Closed Loop Identification Of First Order Plus Dead Time Process Model Under PI Control Tony
More informationPID Control. Objectives
PID Control Objectives The objective of this lab is to study basic design issues for proportional-integral-derivative control laws. Emphasis is placed on transient responses and steady-state errors. The
More informationMTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan
MTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan Outline Motivation & Background: H2 Tracking Performance Limits: new paradigm Explicit analytical solutions with examples H2 Regulation
More informationControl of integral processes with dead time Part IV: various issues about PI controllers
Control of integral processes with dead time Part IV: various issues about PI controllers B. Wang, D. Rees and Q.-C. Zhong Abstract: Various issues about integral processes with dead time controlled by
More informationH-infinity Model Reference Controller Design for Magnetic Levitation System
H.I. Ali Control and Systems Engineering Department, University of Technology Baghdad, Iraq 6043@uotechnology.edu.iq H-infinity Model Reference Controller Design for Magnetic Levitation System Abstract-
More information1 Loop Control. 1.1 Open-loop. ISS0065 Control Instrumentation
Lecture 4 ISS0065 Control Instrumentation 1 Loop Control System has a continuous signal (analog) basic notions: open-loop control, close-loop control. 1.1 Open-loop Open-loop / avatud süsteem / открытая
More informationMULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 1, No. 8 (215) 113-1115 School of Engineering, Taylor s University MULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (2-3 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30 Today: Recap
More informationRobust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method
International Journal of Electrical Engineering. ISSN 0974-2158 Volume 7, Number 2 (2014), pp. 257-270 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
More informationChapter 2 Background and Preliminaries
Chapter 2 Background and Preliminaries Abstract In this chapter, fundamental definitions and terminology are given to the reader regarding the closed-loop control system. The analysis of the control loop
More informationTuning Rules for Proportional Resonant Controllers
Tuning Rules for Proportional Resonant Controllers Luís Fernando Alves Pereira and Alexandre Sanfelice Bazanella, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract In this paper we propose a particular structure for resonant
More informationUncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems
Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Outline Nature of uncertainty (models and signals). Physical sources of model uncertainty. Mathematical
More informationH-infinity Vehicle Control Using NonDimensional Perturbation Measures
H-ininity Vehicle Control sing NonDimensional Perturbation Measures Abstract Robust controller design techniques have been applied to the ield o vehicle control to achieve many dierent perormance measures:
More informationLecture 6. Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 6 Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 6 p. 1/73 6.1 General
More informationControl Systems. Root Locus & Pole Assignment. L. Lanari
Control Systems Root Locus & Pole Assignment L. Lanari Outline root-locus definition main rules for hand plotting root locus as a design tool other use of the root locus pole assignment Lanari: CS - Root
More informationChapter 7 Interconnected Systems and Feedback: Well-Posedness, Stability, and Performance 7. Introduction Feedback control is a powerful approach to o
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 7 Interconnected
More information1 An Overview and Brief History of Feedback Control 1. 2 Dynamic Models 23. Contents. Preface. xiii
Contents 1 An Overview and Brief History of Feedback Control 1 A Perspective on Feedback Control 1 Chapter Overview 2 1.1 A Simple Feedback System 3 1.2 A First Analysis of Feedback 6 1.3 Feedback System
More informationreality is complex process
ISS0080 Automation and Process Control Lecture 5 1 Process models the desire to describe reality Model of the process, model simplication, identication. model reality is complex process Replaces the original;
More informationmatic scaling, ii) it can provide or bilateral power amplication / attenuation; iii) it ensures the passivity o the closed loop system with respect to
Passive Control o Bilateral Teleoperated Manipulators Perry Y. Li Department o Mechanical Engineering University o Minnesota 111 Church St. SE Minneapolis MN 55455 pli@me.umn.edu Abstract The control o
More informationImproved cascade control structure for enhanced performance
Improved cascade control structure for enhanced performance Article (Unspecified) Kaya, İbrahim, Tan, Nusret and Atherton, Derek P. (7) Improved cascade control structure for enhanced performance. Journal
More informationIndex. INDEX_p /15/02 3:08 PM Page 765
INDEX_p.765-770 11/15/02 3:08 PM Page 765 Index N A Adaptive control, 144 Adiabatic reactors, 465 Algorithm, control, 5 All-pass factorization, 257 All-pass, frequency response, 225 Amplitude, 216 Amplitude
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More information1 Relative degree and local normal forms
THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a
More informationA unified approach for proportional-integral-derivative controller design for time delay processes
Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(4), 583-596 (2015) DOI: 10.1007/s11814-014-0237-6 INVITED REVIEW PAPER INVITED REVIEW PAPER pissn: 0256-1115 eissn: 1975-7220 A unified approach for proportional-integral-derivative
More informationImproved Autotuning Using the Shape Factor from Relay Feedback
Article Subscriber access provided by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV Improved Autotuning Using the Shape Factor from Relay Feedback T. Thyagarajan, and Cheng-Ching Yu Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42 (20), 4425-4440
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationDESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR ph CONTROL
DESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR CONTROL Alex D. Kalafatis Liuping Wang William R. Cluett AspenTech, Toronto, Canada School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne,
More informationCompensatorTuning for Didturbance Rejection Associated with Delayed Double Integrating Processes, Part II: Feedback Lag-lead First-order Compensator
CompensatorTuning for Didturbance Rejection Associated with Delayed Double Integrating Processes, Part II: Feedback Lag-lead First-order Compensator Galal Ali Hassaan Department of Mechanical Design &
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
Open-Loop controller An Open-Loop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, non-linear dynamics and parameter
More informationInternal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems
Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems Asma Mezzi Tunis El Manar University, Automatic Control Research Laboratory, LA.R.A, National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT),
More informationTLT-5200/5206 COMMUNICATION THEORY, Exercise 3, Fall TLT-5200/5206 COMMUNICATION THEORY, Exercise 3, Fall Problem 1.
TLT-5/56 COMMUNICATION THEORY, Exercise 3, Fall Problem. The "random walk" was modelled as a random sequence [ n] where W[i] are binary i.i.d. random variables with P[W[i] = s] = p (orward step with probability
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #11 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Relative Stability: Stability
More informationEECE 460 : Control System Design
EECE 460 : Control System Design SISO Pole Placement Guy A. Dumont UBC EECE January 2011 Guy A. Dumont (UBC EECE) EECE 460: Pole Placement January 2011 1 / 29 Contents 1 Preview 2 Polynomial Pole Placement
More informationChapter 9 Robust Stability in SISO Systems 9. Introduction There are many reasons to use feedback control. As we have seen earlier, with the help of a
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 9 Robust
More informationModel-based PID tuning for high-order processes: when to approximate
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 25 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 25 ThB5. Model-based PID tuning for high-order processes: when to approximate
More informationChapter 6 - Solved Problems
Chapter 6 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 6.. Contributed by - James Welsh, University of Newcastle, Australia. Find suitable values for the PID parameters using the Z-N tuning strategy for the nominal
More informationDisturbance Rejection in Parameter-varying Web-winding Systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Disturbance Rejection in Parameter-varying Web-winding Systems Hua Zhong Lucy Y. Pao Electrical and Computer Engineering
More informationIMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION. K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok
IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok Considering marginal control systems, a useful technique, contributing to the method of multi-stage compensation is suggested. A
More informationA design method for two-degree-of-freedom multi-period repetitive controllers for multiple-input/multiple-output systems
A design method for two-degree-of-freedom multi-period repetitive controllers for multiple-input/multiple-output systems Zhongxiang Chen Kou Yamada Tatsuya Sakanushi Iwanori Murakami Yoshinori Ando Nhan
More informationAdditional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. Closed-Loop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationLow-order feedback-feedforward controller for dead-time processes with measurable disturbances
Preprint, 11th IFAC Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems, including Biosystems Low-order feedback-feedforward controller for dead-time processes with measurable disturbances Carlos Rodríguez
More informationMike Grimble Industrial Control Centre, Strathclyde University, United Kingdom
Copyright 2002 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRAINED PREDICTIVE OUTER-LOOP CONTROLLERS: APPLICATION TO A BOILER CONTROL SYSTEM Fernando Tadeo, Teresa Alvarez
More information