Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary"

Transcription

1 Bridge Design Spring 2012 Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary 1 / 2 Geometry Material Properties N gird 6 f' c 4 ksi S 8.00 ft b f 0 in f r ksi = 0.37 * SQRT( f' c ) L over 3.25 ft E c 3640 ksi = 1820 * SQRT(f_c) W barrier 1.25 ft f y 60 ksi contin_barrier FALSE cover top 2 in Expos_Fac top 0.75 Loads cover bot 1 in Expos_Fac bot 1 h wear 2 in P wheel -16 k W_out ft = (Ng - 1) * Sg + 2 * Lo W_in ft = W_out - 2 * Wbarrier N_lanes 3 =INT( W_in / 12 ) Flexure Design: OK Overhang Between the Girders h 8 in 8 in with: # 5 3" on the top with: # 5 6" on the top # 5 10" on the bottom # 5 10" on the bottom Ductility: M n k-ft / ft M n OK OK Mu Mu k-ft / ft Ductility: M n OK OK Ductility: Mu M n OK OK Mu T u 4.13 Top Reinforcement Top Reinforcement bar top 5 in bar top 5 s max 42 in s max 13 in OK s top 3 in s top 6 in Bottom Reinforcement Bottom Reinforcement bar bot 5 bar bot 5 s max in s max 12 in OK s bot 10 in s bot 10 in

2 Bridge Design Spring 2012 Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary 2 / 2 Distribution Reinforcement OK bar tdistrib 5 A s_dist in 2 s distrib 14 in A s_dist_req' in 2 Temp. & Shrinkage Reinforcement OK bar_size 4 A s_t&s 0.13 s 18 in A s_t&s_req 0.11 in 2 Calculations: M n : M n : h 8 in h 8 in bar top 5 in 2 =bar top bar top 5 in 2 =bar top bar bot 5 in 2 =bar bot bar bot 5 in 2 =bar bot s top 3 in =s top s top 6 in =s top s bot 10 in =s bot s bot 10 in =s bot cov top 2 in =cover top cov top 2 in =cover top cov bot 1 in =cover bot cov bot 1 in =cover bot P ax 4.13 k P ax 0 k see sheet Calc_fMn M n_ pos k-ft / ft see sheet Calc_fMn M n_ neg k-ft / ft for details M n_ neg k-ft / ft for details 1.2 M cr 9.47 k-ft / ft 1.2 M cr 9.47 k-ft / ft Crack Control Crack Control h 8 in h 8 in bar top 5 bar top 5 bar bot 5 bar bot 5 s top 3 in s top 6 in s bot 10 in s bot 10 in cov top 2 in cov top 2 in cov bot 1 in cov bot 1 in M serv_pos 0.00 k-ft / ft M serv_pos 5.49 k-ft / ft M serv_neg k-ft / ft M serv_neg k-ft / ft s max_top 42.3 in see sheet Calc_fs_serv s max_top 13.1 in see sheet Calc_fs_serv 18.0 for details s max_bot 12 in for details Distribution Reinforcement S eff 8 ft = S g - b f /2/12 A s_dist / A s = MIN( 0.67, 220 / SQRT( S eff ) / 100 ) A s_bar in 2 A s in 2 =A s_bar * 12 / s bot A s_dist_ req'd in 2 / ft = A s * A s_dist / A s bar_size 5 s 14 in A bar 0.31 in 2 A s_dist in 2 / ft = A bar * 12 / s Temperature & Shrinkage Reinforcement A s_t&s_req'd in 2 / ft = 12 * h / ( 2 * (12 * h) * f y ) A s_t&s_req'd 0.11 in 2 / ft = MAX( 0.11, MIN(0.6, A s_t&s_req'd ) )

3 Loads & Moments 1 / 2 S 8.00 ft L over 3.25 ft b f 0.00 in W barrier 1.25 ft Dead Loads: Overhang Between the Girders h slab_over 8 in h slab 8 in A barrier 2.03 sf 293 h wear 2 in x barrier 0.42 ft w slab_over -100 psf = -150 * h slab_over /12 w slab -100 psf = -150 * h slab /12 w wear psf = -145 * h wear /12 w wear psf = -145 * h wear /12 w barrier plf = -150 * A barrier Live Loads: P wheel -16 k Moments: M- (at Ext. Girder) (0.35 L of Ext. Span) (1st Int. Girder) Dead Loads: I slab ft 2 from sheet "Influ_+M" I slab 5.35 ft 2 from sheet "Influ_-M" M slab_over k-ft / ft = w slab_over /1000 * 1/2 * L over ^2 M slab k-ft / ft = I slab * w slab /1000 M slab k-ft / ft = I slab * w slab /1000 M wear k-ft / ft M wear k-ft / ft = I slab * w wear /1000 M wear k-ft / ft = I slab * w wear /1000 =w wear /1000 * 1/2 * (L over - W barrier )^2 I barrier 1.58 ft from sheet "Influ_+M" I barrier ft from sheet "Influ_-M" M barrier k-ft / ft = w barrier /1000 * (L over - x barrier ) M barrier k-ft / ft = I barrier * w barrier /1000 M barrier k-ft / ft = I barrier * w barrier /1000

4 Loads & Moments 2 / 2 M- (at Ext. Girder) (0.35 L of Ext. Span) (1st Int. Girder) Live Loads: One Two One Two x wheel 1.00 ft = L over - W barrier - 1 Truck Trucks Truck Trucks M wheel k-ft = P wheel * x wheel I truck ft, from Sheet "Influ_+M" I truck from sheet "Influ_-M" w 4.58 ft = ( * x wheel )/12 M truck = P wheel * I truck M truck MPF 1.2 MPF MPF M wheel k-ft / ft = M wheel * MPF /w M truck = M truck * MPF M truck = M truck * MPF M truck 28.4 k-ft 1 Truck Controls M truck k-ft 1 Truck Controls M line k-ft / ft w 6.57 ft = ( * S ) /12 w 6.00 ft = ( * S ) /12 M truck k-ft / ft = MIN( M wheel, M line ) M truck 4.33 k-ft / ft = M truck / w M truck k-ft / ft = M truck / w IM 0.33 IM 0.33 IM 0.33 M truck k-ft / ft = M truck * (1 + IM) M truck 5.76 k-ft / ft =M truck * (1 + IM) M truck k-ft / ft =M truck * (1 + IM) Strength I Load Combination: M U k-ft / ft M U k-ft / ft M U k-ft / ft = 1.25 * (M slab_over + M barrier ) * M wear * M truck = 1.25 * M slab * M wear *M barrier * M truck Extreme Event II Load Combination: M collision k / ft from sheet "Barrier" T collision 4.13 k-ft / ft from sheet "Barrier" M U k-ft / ft = 1.25 * (M slab_over + M barrier ) * M wear * 0.5 * M truck + 1 * M collision T U 4.13 k / ft = 1 * T collision Service I Load Combination: k-ft / ft M serv 5.49 k-ft / ft M serv k-ft / ft = M slab_over * + M wear + M truck = M slab * M wear + M barrier + M truck = M slab * M wear + M barrier + M truck

5 Barrier 1 / 4 Area of barrier: in in in^2 in X Y A x_bar A barrier 293 in^2 x_bar 5.08 in ht of barrier H 32 in Extereme Event II Limit State: Strength of slab should be sufficent to resist force Rw at top of barrrier (from ALBDS, Sect. 13) From Table A13.2-1: TL-4 Ft 54 k transverse force on barrier FL 18 k longitudinal force on barrier Fv 4.5 k vertical force on barrier Lt 3.5 ft length of impact force

6 Barrier 2 / 4 2. Mn about vert. axis M w : = avg of +'ve Mn and -'ve Mn Consider equivalent rectangular section of width b and depth h: h width of section b 32 in = H depth of section h 9.16 in = A barrier / H Avg effective depth, d, of Horiz. Rebar: b Bars on Left: distance from distance from h left face right face Bar = 2 + 5/8 + 1/2 * 4/ Bar = 2 + 5/8 + 1/2 * 4/ Bar = 2 + 5/8 + 1/2 * 4/ Avg Bars on Right: distance from distance from h right face left face Bar = 2 + 5/8 + 1/2 * 4/ = h - d_right Bar = 2 + 5/8 + 1/2 * 4/ Bar = * 5/8 + 1/2 * 4/8 4.5 Bar = 4 + 5/8 + 1/2 * 4/ Avg bar_size 4 A bar 0.20 in 2 A s_left_bars 0.60 in 2 = 3 * A bar A s_right_bars 0.80 in 2 = 4 * A bar (comp. on left) (comp. on right) d 5.47 in d 6.96 in d' 2.88 in d' 3.53 in A s 0.80 in 2 =A s_right_bars A s 0.60 in 2 =A s_left_bars A s ' 0.60 in 2 =A s_left_bars A s ' 0.80 in 2 =A s_right_bars b 32 M+ d 5.47 d' 2.88 A s 0.80 A s ' 0.60 M- d 6.96 d' 3.53 A s 0.60 A s ' 0.80 M n See Sheet "Calc_fMn_2" for calculation details M n M w k-ft =( M n+ + ABS( M n- ) ) / 2

7 Barrier 3 / 4 2. Mn about long. axis M c : only +'ve M (outside surface in compression) consider equivalent rectangular section of width b and depth h: b 12 in h 9.16 in b bar_size 5 s 9 in assume bar spacing A bar 0.31 in 2 same as bottom bars in slab bar in A s 0.41 in 2 = A bar * 12 / s h (comp. on left) M+ d 6.84 in = h - 2-1/2 * 5/8 d' 2.31 in = 2 + 1/2 * 5/8 A s 0.41 in 2 =A s A s ' 0.41 in 2 =A s b 12 M+ d 6.84 d' 2.31 A s 0.41 A s ' 0.41 M- d 0.00 d' 0.00 A s 0.00 A s ' 0.80 M n M n- #DIV/0! M C k-ft / ft

8 Barrier 4 / 4 3. Check Development Length inclined bar from barrier into slab: f' c 4 ksi f y 60 ksi Tension: L avail 9.8 in = (8-1) * 1.4 8" slab, 1" cover, bar angled at 45 degrees for straight bars L db 15 in 12 in 11.6 in = 1.25 * A bar * f y / SQRT(f' c ) 15 in = 0.4 * bar * f y max: 15 in for hooked bar L db 11.9 in 6 in 5 in = 8 * bar 11.9 in =38* bar /SQRT(f' c ) max: 11.9 in Reduce A s by L avail / (L db for straight bars) A s_reduc 0.27 in 2 = A s * L avail / L db Check Development Length of bars in Compression: L db 11.8 in 11.8 in = 0.63 * bar * f y / SQRT(f' c ) 11.3 in = 0.3 * bar *f y max: 11.8 in M C k-ft / ft with no reduction k-ft / ft with A s = 0.18 in k-ft / ft with A s = 0.18 in 2 and A s ' = 0 use M C 8.07 k-ft / ft (conservative) R W : L c ft = Lt / 2 + SQRT( (Lt /2 )^2 + (8 * H/12 * M w ) / M C ) R W 69.1 k = ( 2 / ( 2*L c - Lt ) ) * ( 8 * M w + M C * L c^2 / (H/12) ) OK, Rw > Ft = 54 k M at base of barrier from Rw, per foot M CT k-ft / ft = -(R W * H/12) / L c T 4.13 k / ft = R W / (L c + 2 * H/12)

9 Calc_fMn 1 / 2 h 8 bar top 5 f' c 4 ksi bar bot s top 6 f r 0.74 ksi =0.37 * SQRT( f' c ) s bot 10 cov top 2 f y 60 ksi cov bot 1 P ax 0 M n_ pos M n_ neg Mcr 9.47 A bar_top 0.31 in 2 A bar_bot 0.31 in 2 A s_top in 2 = A bar_top * 12 / s top A s_bot 0.37 in 2 = A bar_bot * 12 / s bot bar_top in bar_bot in d 6.69 in =h - cov bot - bar_bot / 2 d 5.69 in = h - cov top - bar_top / 2 d' 2.31 in = cov top + bar_top / 2 d' 1.31 in = cov bot + bar_bot / 2 A s 0.37 in 2 = A s_bot A s 0.62 in 2 = A s_top A s ' 0.62 in 2 = A s_top A s ' 0.37 in 2 = A s_bot find y c : Calc. y c from F = * f'c * 12 * 1 * y c - (.003 / y c * (y c - d')) * E s * A s ' + f y A s - P = 0 assuming tensile steel yields Use quadratic formula to solve for y c y = (-b +/- sqrt( b^2-4ac) / (2a) a = * f' c * 12 * 1 a = * f' c * 12 * 1 b -32 = A s * f y - P ax - A s ' * * b 5 = A s * f y - P ax - A s ' * * c 125 =A s ' * * * d' c 42 =A s ' * * * d' y c_try 1.49 in y c_try = ( -b - SQRT( b^2-4 * a * c)) / ( 2 * a) y c 1.49 y c 1.18 Internal Forces: a in = y c * 1 a in s ' = / y c * (y c - d') s ' s = / y c * d s

10 Calc_fMn 2 / 2 C k = 0.85 * f' c * a * 12 C fs' 47.6 ksi =MAX(-f y, MIN(f y, s ' * 29000) ) fs' 9.9 ksi =MAX(-f y, MIN(f y, * 29000) ) Fs' 29.5 k = fs' * A s ' Fs' 3.7 = fs' * A s ' fs 60.0 =MAX(-f y, MIN(f y, s * ) ) fs 60.0 =MAX(-f y, MIN(f y, s * ) ) T 22.3 k = A s * fs T 37.2 = A s * fs Sum F Sum F dif 0.00 dif 0.00 M n k-ft M n k-ft = -(C * (h/2 - a/2) + Fs' * (h/2 - d') + T * (h/2 - d) )/12 = (C * (h/2 - a/2) + Fs' * (h/2 - d') + T * (h/2 - d) )/ = IF( s <0.002,0.65,IF( s <0.005, * s,0.9)) 0.90 for Strength Limit States 0.90 for Extreme Event Limit State 0.90 M n Ductility: 1.2 M cr 9.47 k-ft = 1.2 * f r * 1/6 * 12 * h^2 / 12

11 Calc_fs_serv 1 / 2 h 8 in f' c 4 ksi bar top 5 in bar bot 5 in 2 f r 0.48 ksi = 0.24 * SQRT( f' c ) s top 6 in s bot 10 in f y 60 ksi cov top 2 in E c 3640 ksi = 1820 * SQRT(f' c ) cov bot 1 in n 7.97 = / E c M serv_pos 5.49 k-ft / ft M serv_neg k-ft / ft e_bot 0.75 s max_top 13.1 ksi e_top 1 s max_bot 12.1 ksi Check if tension in concrete > 0.8 fr: f ct 0.51 ksi = M serv_pos * 12 / (1/6 * 12 * h^2) f ct 0.61 ksi = -M serv_neg * 12 / (1/6 * 12 * h^2) f ct > 0.8 f r TRUE = IF( f ct > 0.8 * f r, TRUE, FALSE ) f ct > 0.8 f r TRUE = IF( f ct > 0.8 * f r, TRUE, FALSE ) find y c : A top_bar 0.31 in 2 A bot_bar 0.31 in 2 A s_top in 2 = A top_bar * 12 / s top A s_bot in 2 = A bot_bar * 12 / s bot bar_top in bar_bot in d 6.69 in =h - cov bot - bar_bot / 2 d 5.69 in = h - cov top - bar_top / 2 d' 2.31 in = cov top + bar_top / 2 d' 1.31 in = cov bot + bar_bot / 2 A s 0.37 in 2 = A s_bot A s in 2 = A s_top A s ' 0.62 in 2 = A s_top A s ' 0.37 in 2 = A s_bot Calc. y c from F = 0-1/2 * K * y c * E c *y c * 12 - K * (y c - d') * E s * A s ' + K * (d - y c ) * E s * A s = 0 divide through by K * E c, let n = E s / E c -1/2 * 12 y c 2 - n * A s ' * (y c - d') + n * A s * (d - y c ) = 0 Use quadratic formula to solve for y c y = (-b +/- sqrt( b^2-4ac) / (2a) a -6.0 = -6 a -6.0 = -6 b -8 = -n * (A s ' + A s ) b -8 = -n * (A s ' + A s ) c 31 = n * (A s ' * d' + A s * d) c 32 = n * (A s ' * d' + A s * d) y c 1.72 in y c 1.74 = ( -b - SQRT( b^2-4 * a * c)) / ( 2 * a) Sum F k = a * y c^2 + b * y c + c Sum F k = a * y c^2 + b * y c + c

12 Calc_fs_serv 2 / 2 Calc. s max: I trans 95 in 4 I trans 99 in 4 = 1/12 * 12 * y c^ * y c * (y c /2)^2 + n * A s ' * (y c - d')^2 + n * A s * (d - y c )^2 M service 5.49 k-ft / ft M service 6.52 k-ft / ft f ss 27.4 ksi = n * M service * 12 * (d - y c ) / I trans f ss 24.9 ksi = n * M service * 12 * (d - y c ) / I trans e 0.75 = e_bot e 1.00 bar_bot 0.63 in bar_top 0.63 in d c 1.31 in = cov bot + bar_bot / 2 d c 2.31 in = cov top + bar_top / 2 s 1.31 = 1 + d c / (0.7 * (h - d c )) s 1.58 = 1 + d c / (0.7 * (h - d c )) s max_top 12.1 in = 700 * e / ( s * f ss ) - 2 * d c s max_top 13.1 in = 700 * e / ( s * f ss ) - 2 * d c s max_bot 12.1 in = IF( f ct > 0.8 f r, s max_top, 18 ) s max_top 13.1 in = IF( f ct > 0.8 f r, s max_top, 18 )

13 Influ_+M 1 / 2 overhangs 3.25 ft span 8.00 ft I for M due Slab and Barrier: I for M due Wheel Loads: I barrier ft I slab ft 2 one truck two trucks max I x_left_wheel space between trucks 9 ft in ft ft ft ft x_model D_model x I I_1_truck I_2_trucks N edge overhang cg of barrier rail eft-most wheel pos support N N N N n3a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

14 Influ_+M 2 / 2 W_out ft W_in 40 ft min_s 4 ft max_s 24 ft =INT( W_in - ( 2*(overhangs+2) ) ) Slope_L Slope_R _slope E-02 rad 6.70E-02 rad E-01 rad I, ft M, k ft Influence for M at.35l of Ext. Span N E-02 N E-02 N E N E-02 N E-02 N3AL E-02 N3AR E-02 N E-02 N E-02 N E N E N E N E-02 N10L E-02 N10R E-02 N E-02 N E-02 N E-03 N E-04 N E-03 N16 M due 0Wheels at 0.35L 0 of 0Ext. Span0-7.66E-03 N E-03 N E-03 N E N E-03 N E N E-03 N E-03 N E-04 N E-03 N Truck 2.05E-03 N E-03 N Trucks 2.61E-03 N E-03 N E N E-03 N E-04 N E-04

15 Influ_-M 1 / 2 overhangs 3.25 ft span 8.00 ft I for M due Slab and Barrier: I for M due Wheel Loads: I barrier ft I slab ft 2 one truck two trucks max I x_left_wheel space between trucks 4.00 ft in ft ft ft ft X, Model, model x I I_one_truck_two_truck N edge overhang cg of barrier rail eft-most wheel pos support N N N N n3a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

16 Influ_-M 2 / 2 W_out ft W_in 40 ft min_s 4 ft max_s 24 ft =INT( W_in - ( 2*(overhangs+2) ) ) Slope_L Slope_R _slope -1.07E-02 rad 9.31E-03 rad 2.01E-02 rad ks N E-03 N E-03 N E-03 N E-03 N E-03 N3AL E-03 N3AR E-03 N E-03 N E-03 N E N E N E N E-03 N10L E N10R E N E N E-03 N E-03 N E-04 N E-03 N16 0M due Wheels E N E N E-03 N E N E-03 N E N E N E N E-05 N E N E N Truck 8.70E-04 N E N Trucks 8.47E N E N E N E-04 N E-04 N E-05 N E-04 N E-04 I, ft M, k ft Influence for M at 1st Interior Support

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder

More information

Appendix K Design Examples

Appendix K Design Examples Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.

More information

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil) QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================

More information

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement. Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab

More information

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual) 1 / 8 Geometry beam span L 40 ft Steel Wide Flange Beam: beam spacing s beam 10 ft F y 50 ksi construction live load LL construc 20 psf row 148 live load LL 150 psf unit weight of concrete UW conc 145

More information

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2.1 INTRODUCTION A.2.2 DESIGN PARAMETERS 1'-5.0" Detailed example showing sample calculations for design of typical Interior AASHTO Type IV prestressed concrete

More information

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Serviceability Deflection calculation Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning

More information

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.

More information

County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007. For prestr. beams, assume 12" top flange, therefore take 4" from CL Gird.

County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007. For prestr. beams, assume 12 top flange, therefore take 4 from CL Gird. County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007 SLAB DESIGN EXAMPLE Design: Using AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications - 4 th Ed. and TxDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual 8" Slab

More information

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order: GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on

More information

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0. Example (8.1): Using the ACI Code approximate structural analysis, design for a warehouse, a continuous one-way solid slab supported on beams 4.0 m apart as shown in Figure 1. Assume that the beam webs

More information

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,

More information

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections

More information

***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com

***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com Spreadsheet Title: Last Revision 8/27/2005 ***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com www.designspreadsheets.com email: info@designspreadsheets.com Project I-Girder

More information

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia

More information

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.1-4.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR

More information

Example: 5-panel parallel-chord truss. 8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F yield = 36 ksi F tension = 21 ksi F comp. = 10 ksi. 6 ft.

Example: 5-panel parallel-chord truss. 8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F yield = 36 ksi F tension = 21 ksi F comp. = 10 ksi. 6 ft. CE 331, Spring 2004 Beam Analogy for Designing Trusses 1 / 9 We need to make several decisions in designing trusses. First, we need to choose a truss. Then we need to determine the height of the truss

More information

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages P L/2 L PL/4 MOMNT F b < 1 lastic F b = 2 lastic F b = 3 lastoplastic 4 F b = Plastic hinge Plastic Dr. M.. Haque, P.. (LRFD:

More information

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted Errata posted 8-16-2017 Revisions are shown in red. Question 521, p. 47: Question 521 should read as follows: 521. The W10 22 steel eam (Fy = 50 ksi) shown in the figure is only raced at the center of

More information

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.

More information

Example Stayed beam with two pylons

Example Stayed beam with two pylons Example Stayed beam with two pylons A roof structure is a stayed beam. The roof span is 300 ft. Stay vertical run is 20 ft. The deck is weighs 12 PSF. Beams have a transverse spacing equal to 40 feet.

More information

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS

More information

Attachment K. Supplemental Shear Test Information

Attachment K. Supplemental Shear Test Information Attachment K. Supplemental Shear Test Information Computer Program Due to the iterative nature of shear design following the General Procedure in Article 5.8.3.4.2 of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23

More information

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k E 331, Fall 2004 HW 2.0 Solution 1 / 7 We need to make several decisions when designing a truss. First, we need to determine the truss shape. Then we need to determine the height of the truss and the member

More information

Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design

Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design Version: Aug-10-017 Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design The concrete floor slab system shown below is for an intermediate

More information

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of

More information

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] A typical floor system of a lecture hall is to be designed as a ribbed slab. The joists which are spaced at 400mm are supported by girders. The overall depth of the slab

More information

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil

More information

mportant nstructions to examiners: ) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. ) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may

More information

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss

More information

1/29/2010 Page 2 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 3 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 4 of 65 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 5 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number 09-118 West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn

More information

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Two-way slabs have tension reinforcing spanning in BOTH directions, and may take the general form of one of the following: Types of Two-Way Slab Systems Lecture 7 Page 1 of 13 The

More information

APPENDIX G I-BEAM SUMMARIES 0.6-IN. STRAND G-1

APPENDIX G I-BEAM SUMMARIES 0.6-IN. STRAND G-1 APPENDIX G I-BEAM SUMMARIES.6-IN. STRAND G-1 Concrete Compressive Strength Embedment Length(L e ) Span Failure Mode Maximum Load Maximum Shear Maximum Moment Maximum Deflection attained Rebound after complete

More information

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department

More information

BRIDGE RAIL DESIGN PROCEDURE EMAD BADIEE NASIM UDDIN, CHAIR IAN EDWARD HOSCH LEE MORADI

BRIDGE RAIL DESIGN PROCEDURE EMAD BADIEE NASIM UDDIN, CHAIR IAN EDWARD HOSCH LEE MORADI BRIDGE RAIL DESIGN PROCEDURE by EMAD BADIEE NASIM UDDIN, CHAIR IAN EDWARD HOSCH LEE MORADI A THESIS Submitted to the graduate faculty of The University of Alabama at Birmingham, in partial fulfillment

More information

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections 4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

Two Way Beam Supported Slab

Two Way Beam Supported Slab Two Way Beam Supported Slab Part 2 The following example was done by Mr. Naim Hassan, 3 rd Year 2 nd Semester Student of CE Dept., AUST 16 The following Example was done by Md. Mahmudun Nobe, ID -.01.03.078,

More information

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent

More information

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602 Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded

More information

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS DESIGN STATEMENT THIS GALVANISED STEEL PLATFORM IS ANALYSED USING THE ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN METHOD TO DETERMINE MATERIAL STRENGTH. MEMBER SIZES AND FASTENERS ARE CHOSEN NOT SO MUCH FOR THEIR STRENGTH

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0

More information

Design 1 Calculations

Design 1 Calculations Design 1 Calculations The following calculations are based on the method employed by Java Module A and are consistent with ACI318-99. The values in Fig. 1 below were taken from the Design 1 Example found

More information

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal

More information

twenty one concrete construction: materials & beams ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014

twenty one concrete construction: materials & beams ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014 ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: http:// nisee.berkeley.edu/godden materials & beams Concrete Beams

More information

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection Example: Continuous beam deflection Analyze the short-term and ultimate long-term deflections of end-span of multi-span beam shown below. Ignore comp steel Beam spacing = 3000 mm b eff = 9000/4 = 2250

More information

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE F-DEK ROOF (ASD) 1-1/2" high x 6" pitch x 36" wide SECTION PROPERTIES GAGE Wd 22 1.63 20 1.98 18 2.62 16 3.30 I D (DEFLECTION) 0.142 0.173 0.228 fy = 40 ksi Sp Sn 0.122 0.135 708 815 905 1211 1329 2365

More information

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Introduction A beam is a long, slender structural member that resists loads that are generally applied transverse (perpendicular) to its longitudinal axis.

More information

AASHTO-LRFD LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS

AASHTO-LRFD LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS AASHTO-LRFD LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS By Toorak Zokaie, 1 Member, ASCE ABSTRACT: The live load distribution factors contained in the AASHTO-LRFD Bridge Design Specification present a major

More information

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine

More information

- Rectangular Beam Design -

- Rectangular Beam Design - Semester 1 2016/2017 - Rectangular Beam Design - Department of Structures and Material Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Introduction The purposes

More information

Sub. Code:

Sub. Code: Important Instructions to examiners: ) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. ) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension

More information

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD E mail: tamas.nagy gyorgy@upt.ro Tel: +40 256 403 935 Web: http://www.ct.upt.ro/users/tamasnagygyorgy/index.htm Office: A219 SIMPLE SUPORTED BEAM b = 15 cm h = 30 cm

More information

Samantha Ramirez, MSE

Samantha Ramirez, MSE Samantha Ramirez, MSE Centroids The centroid of an area refers to the point that defines the geometric center for the area. In cases where the area has an axis of symmetry, the centroid will lie along

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-91 (80-266-18**) Unit: YORK ZJ,ZR 180-300 / ZF 210-300 / XP 180-240 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 126.25 in (Length

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 (80-266-19**) Unit: ZF180 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 115.25 in (Length of curb) wcurb = 84 in (Width of curb)

More information

UC Berkeley CE 123 Fall 2017 Instructor: Alan Kren

UC Berkeley CE 123 Fall 2017 Instructor: Alan Kren CE 123 - Reinforced Concrete Midterm Examination No. 2 Instructions: Read these instructions. Do not turn the exam over until instructed to do so. Work all problems. Pace yourself so that you have time

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of Client: ProVent PV1805 Project: CBISC-05 Iso Curb CBISPRS Upper curb rail Unit: YORK ZX 04-07; XX A7; ZY, ZQ, XY, XQ 04-06 Curb Information Hcurb upper = 5.5 in (Height of upper curb rail) Lcurb = 70.375

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0 kn OK Design shear force, V d 4223 kn

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0

More information

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6 Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L

More information

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram - Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Investigate the capacity for the irregular

More information

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis EUROCODES Bridges: Background and applications Dissemination of information for training Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 1 Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis Laurence

More information

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes

More information

Moment Redistribution

Moment Redistribution TIME SAVING DESIGN AID Page 1 of 23 A 3-span continuous beam has center-to-center span lengths of 30 ft-0 in. The beam is 20 in. by 28 in. and all columns are 20 in. by 20 in. In this example, the beam

More information

Chapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W.

Chapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W. Chapter 2 Design for Shear By Richard W. Furlong 2.1 Introduction Shear is the term assigned to forces that act perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of structural elements. Shear forces on beams are

More information

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011 Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011 Latest in Design Methods? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2010 Direct Design Method for Concrete Pipe 1993? LRFD5732FlexuralResistance

More information

Reinforced Concrete Structures

Reinforced Concrete Structures Reinforced Concrete Structures MIM 232E Dr. Haluk Sesigür I.T.U. Faculty of Architecture Structural and Earthquake Engineering WG Ultimate Strength Theory Design of Singly Reinforced Rectangular Beams

More information

Suspended Beam Roof with Pylons

Suspended Beam Roof with Pylons Cable Supported Structures George.Hearn@colorado.edu 25 Suspended Beam Roof with Pylons A roof structure is a suspended beam. The roof span is 200 ft. Main cable sag is 20 ft. Suspender length varies.

More information

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified

More information

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by:

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by: 5.11. Under-reinforced Beams (Read Sect. 3.4b oour text) We want the reinforced concrete beams to fail in tension because is not a sudden failure. Therefore, following Figure 5.3, you have to make sure

More information

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams [8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams Page 1 of 28 [8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams [8.1] Bending of Beams (will not be covered in class) [8.2] Bending Strain and Stress [8.3] Shear in Straight

More information

Designer Supplement GSD-1-19 Intermediate Crossframes and Intermediate Diaphragms January 18, 2019

Designer Supplement GSD-1-19 Intermediate Crossframes and Intermediate Diaphragms January 18, 2019 Designer Supplement GSD-1-19 Intermediate Crossframes and Intermediate Diaphragms January 18, 2019 1 Overview The purpose of Standard Bridge Drawing, GSD-1-19, is to address updated design requirements

More information

INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS Paper N 1458 Registration Code: S-H1463506048 INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS N. Takahashi (1) (1) Associate Professor, Tohoku University, ntaka@archi.tohoku.ac.jp

More information

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia DESIGN OF STAIRCASE Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction T N T G N G R h Flight Span, L Landing T = Thread

More information

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5 As = 736624/(0.5*413.69) = 3562 mm 2 (ADAPT 3569 mm 2, B29, C6) Data Block 27 - Compressive Stresses The initial compressive strength, f ci, is the strength entered in the Material/Concrete input screen.

More information

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 2-1. Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). 4-1.

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of

More information

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed Prepared by : Date : Verified by : Date : Project : Ref Calculation Output Design of RCC Chimney :- 1) Dimensions of Chimney and Forces 200 Unit weight of Fire Brick Lining 19000 N/m3 100 Height of Fire

More information

APPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

APPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS APPENIX COMPARISON O CURVE STEEL I-GIRER BRIGE ESIGN SPECIICATIONS (This page is intentionally left blank.) TABLE O CONTENTS LIST O IGURES... -iv LIST O TABLES... -vi 1 OBJECTIVE... -1 METHOOLOGY... -1

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

Mechanics of Materials

Mechanics of Materials Mechanics of Materials Notation: a = acceleration = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) SD = allowable stress design d = diameter of a hole = calculus symbol for differentiation e = change

More information

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups: Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 017 3. Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups: (1) slabs supported on edges of

More information

Column Design. Columns Axial Load and Bending

Column Design. Columns Axial Load and Bending Column Design MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VI Dr. Jason E. Charalambides = = Columns Axial Load and Bending We tend to have this image of columns that we envision

More information

Lap splice length and details of column longitudinal reinforcement at plastic hinge region

Lap splice length and details of column longitudinal reinforcement at plastic hinge region Lap length and details of column longitudinal reinforcement at plastic hinge region Hong-Gun Park 1) and Chul-Goo Kim 2) 1), 2 Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University,

More information

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major

More information

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual (Alberta, Canada) Web: Tel: 1-403-510568 01-01-01 Rev 1.0.0 Page 1 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT... 3.0 QUICK

More information

There are three main types of structure - mass, framed and shells.

There are three main types of structure - mass, framed and shells. STRUCTURES There are three main types of structure - mass, framed and shells. Mass structures perform due to their own weight. An example would be a dam. Frame structures resist loads due to the arrangement

More information

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Reinforced

More information

Performance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns

Performance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Performance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Michael P. Berry Marc O. Eberhard University of Washington Project funded by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center

More information

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola Mechanics of materials branch of mechanics that studies the internal effects of stress and strain in a solid body. stress is associated with the

More information

B U I L D I N G D E S I G N

B U I L D I N G D E S I G N B U I L D I N G D E S I G N 10.1 DESIGN OF SLAB P R I O D E E P C H O W D H U R Y C E @ K 8. 0 1 7 6 9 4 4 1 8 3 DESIGN BY COEFFICIENT METHOD Loads: DL = 150 pc LL = 85 pc Material Properties: c = 3000

More information