TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9)."

Transcription

1 TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9) Columns 4-2. Shear walls and core 5. Design of horizontal elements (SAP2000, Ver.16) Design of slabs 5-2. Design of stairs 5-3. Design of beams 6. Design of foundation (SAP2000, Ver.16) Shallow foundation (Raft) 6-2. Deep foundation (Pile cap) 7. Structural drawings list of project.

2 1. DESIGN CRITERIA

3 1-1. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The building's plot is nearly a rectangular shape with dimensions of 21.1 m X m No Minimum required set-back, the building has two neighbours plots The proposed building consists of the following floors: 1- Basement floor - Car parking with 2.7 m height occupying the full plot area. 2- Ground floor - Main lobbies, commercial stores. 3- Nine Typical floors STRUCTURAL SYSTEM: Reinforced concrete slabs supported cast-in-situ Columns and Walls. Raft foundation will be used to support the building. The lateral stability is provided by Cast in-situ frames and/or Core walls DESIGN STANDARD AND CODES: Egyptian code of practice (ECCS , 2010), Design and construction of Concrete Structures. Egyptian code of practice (ECP ), Loading for Buildings. Egyptian code of practice (ECP ), Loading for Buildings.

4 1-4. MATERIALS: CONCRETE: The characteristic concrete cube compressive strength after 28 days shall be as follows: Plain concrete and Blinding = 20 N/mm2 Raft Foundation = 25 N/mm2 Reinforced Slabs and Beams = 25 N/mm2 Cast in-situ Columns and Walls = 25 N/mm2 Own weight of reinforced concrete = 25 KN/m3 Own weight of plain concrete = 22 KN/m STEEL REINFORCEMENT: High yield steel T - Specified characteristic strength F Y = 360 N/mm2 - Minimum elongation on gauge length = 14% 1-5. CONCRETE COVER TO STEEL REINFORCEMENT: Concrete cover to steel reinforcement shall be provided to protect the reinforcement against corrosion and fire. Adopted fire rating requirements: Load bearing walls & columns = 2 hrs. fire rating Floor construction including beams = 2 hrs. fire rating Shafts and stair walls = 2 hrs. fire rating According to fire resistance requirements adopted and as listed in table 3.4 (BS 8110-Part 1:1997): Cast in-situ Beams simply supported = 30 mm Cast in-situ Beams continuous = 25 mm Cast in-situ slabs simply supported = 30 mm Cast in-situ slabs continuous = 25 mm Columns & walls = 30 mm

5 1-6. LOADS: Vertical loads (in excess of self-weight of members): A- Basement: Finishes Services & False ceiling Dead Load Live Load = 1.50 kn/m2 = 0.50 kn/m2 = 4.50 kn/m2 = 5.00 kn/m2 A- Ground: Finishes Services & False ceiling Live Load = 1.50 kn/m2 = 0.50 kn/m2 = 5.00 kn/m2 B- Typical Floors: Finishes Services & False ceiling Live Load = 1.50 kn/m2 = 0.50 kn/m2 = 2.00 kn/m2 C- Stairs loads: Finishes Live Load = 2.00 kn/m2 = 3.00 kn/m2

6 2. LATERAL LOADS

7 2-1.Wind loads F= C K q Where: C=1.3 Where 0.8 for compression+0.5 for suction K= 1.0 for 0-30m, 1.05 for (30-50) Area B (Suburban Exposure) q= 0.5x10-3 V 2 C t C s Where:- Ƥ Air Density =1.25 Kg/m 3 V Wind Velocity =30 m/sec at Tanta C t Earth topography = 1.00 in flat land C s Structure height =1.00 for structures heights no exceed 60m

8 Calculations of wind loads Area B Height of Building = 32.80m Width of Building = 38.70m

9 -2. Seismic Loads Equivalent static load According to the ECP1993 using Equivalent static load- see attached calculation in next calculation -Y-Y Direction -X-X Direction -Overturning Moment

10 Y-Y Direction Base Shear Basic Equiation: Equivalent Static Seismic Loads V = Z. I. K. C. S. W where: Z = Seismic Intensity Factor 0.1 first zone 0.2 second zone Enter value of Z third zone I = Building Importance Factor 1.25 Emergancy buildings: Hospitals, fire stations, Police stations, emergancy centers, communication building Enter value of I 1 1 Other buildings: Residential, commercial, public K = Structural System Coefficient 1.33 depends on lateral load resisting system and its ductility Box using shear walls or braced frames Frames only: 0.67 ductile frames 0.80 non-ductile frames Enter value of K Mixed system (shear walls and frames) where T: C = 1/ [15 sqrt( T )] C < = 0.12 Enter "1" for case (a) or "2" for case (b) 2 Enter No. of floors Calculated "T" = Calculated "C" = Chosen "C" 11 T = 0.1 N Case (a): for building with frames able to carry all the lateral force; where N = number of floors Enter value of H 33 T = 0.09 H / sqrt(b) Case (b): for other systems Enter value of B H = Height of building above foundation level Calculated "T" = Calculated "C" = Chosen "C" B = width of building in the direction of Earthquake S = Soil Coefficient 1.00 Rock, very dense > 15m, mid-dense < 15m above better soil conditions 1.15 Mid-dense or dense > 15m, or loose soil above better soil conditions Enter value of S loose or weak soil > 15m W = Weight of the building Enter weight of each floor in the followig table = Permenant loads; for building with live loads less or equal 500 kg/m2 = Permenant loads + 1/2 LL; for buildings with storage loads > 500 kg/m2

11 Lateral Load Distribution: Entered and Calculated Coefficient: Floor No. Floor Load (W) Height (H) from foundation Wi x Hi Force on each floor Z I K C S W V = Additional force at roof level (Ft) = 0.07 T. V (max V ; = 0 if T <= 0.7) Chosen "T" = Caculated "Ft" = Caculated "0.25 V" = S Ft = 0.00 T < or = 0.7 Over turning moment in Y- Dir Floor No Force on each floor Height (H) from foundation over turning moment total

12 X-X Direction Base Shear Basic Equiation: Equivalent Static Seismic Loads V = Z. I. K. C. S. W where: Z = Seismic Intensity Factor 0.1 first zone 0.2 second zone Enter value of Z third zone I = Building Importance Factor 1.25 Emergancy buildings: Hospitals, fire stations, Police stations, emergancy centers, communication building Enter value of I 1 1 Other buildings: Residential, commercial, public K = Structural System Coefficient 1.33 depends on lateral load resisting system and its ductility Box using shear walls or braced frames Frames only: 0.67 ductile frames 0.80 non-ductile frames Enter value of K Mixed system (shear walls and frames) where T: C = 1/ [15 sqrt( T )] C < = 0.12 Enter "1" for case (a) or "2" for case (b) 2 Enter No. of floors Calculated "T" = Calculated "C" = Chosen "C" 11 T = 0.1 N Case (a): for building with frames able to carry all the lateral force; where N = number of floors Enter value of H 33 T = 0.09 H / sqrt(b) Case (b): for other systems Enter value of B 38.8 H = Height of building above foundation level Calculated "T" = Calculated "C" = Chosen "C" B = width of building in the direction of Earthquake S = Soil Coefficient 1.00 Rock, very dense > 15m, mid-dense < 15m above better soil conditions 1.15 Mid-dense or dense > 15m, or loose soil above better soil conditions Enter value of S loose or weak soil > 15m W = Weight of the building Graduation Enter weight Project of each floor in the followig table = Permenant loads; for building with live loads less or equal 500 kg/m2 = Permenant loads + 1/2 Eng. LL; Magdy for buildings Mahmoud with storage loads > 500 kg/m2

13 Lateral Load Distribution: Entered and Calculated Coefficient: Floor No. Floor Load (W) Height (H) from foundation Wi x Hi Force on each floor Z I K C S W V = Additional force at roof level (Ft) = 0.07 T. V (max V ; = 0 if T <= 0.7) Chosen "T" = Caculated "Ft" = Caculated "0.25 V" = S Ft = 0.00 T < or = 0.7 Over turning moment in X- Dir Floor No Force on each floor Height (H) from foundation over turning moment total

14 Loads At X Direction At Y Direction

15 Response spectrum A- Response spectrum types B- Selected soil type Value of damping coefficient η = 1 Value of a g /g A g /g =0.125

16 C- Response modification factor R- (Reduction factor) R=5 E- Importance Factor Ordinary Residential Building I = 1 F- Modelling Requirements The mathematical model of the physical structure shall include all elements of the lateral force-resisting system. The model shall also include the stiffness and strength of elements, which are significant to the distribution of forces and shall represent the spatial distribution of the mass and stiffness of the structure. In addition, stiffness properties shall consider the effects of cracked sections. A reduction factor of Reduction factor of stiffness properties Beam Ieff/Ig 0.5 Column Ieff/Ig 0.7 Wall Ieff/Ig 0.7 Slabs Ieff/Ig 0.25 Calculated story drift shall not exceed 0.01 times the story height. Calculated Total drift at the final floor shall not exceed H/500, where H is the total Height of Building. G- Total Weight of Building Due to Ordinary Residential Building So W t = D.L L.L

17 The Egyptian code of loads ( )

18

19 Input Data SOIL TYPE A,B,C or D = c ZONE 1,2,3,4,5A or 5B = 2 REDUCTION FACTOR (R) = 5 Total Weight of building (TON)= 9319 TOTAL HEIGHT of building (m)= 32.8 IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1 or 1.2 = 1 T1= SR RESPONSE SPECTRUM CURVE hi Wi (ton) hi wi Fi (ton) Base Monet Summations

20 1.8. LOAD COMBINATIONS Combinations for Lateral Loads Case (1) Case (2) Case (3) P= (1.4 DL+1.6LL) P= 0.8(1.4 DL+1.6 LL+ lateral) P= (0.9DL +1.3 Lateral) E1 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & 0.8 EQx1 E2 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & -0.8 EQx1 E3 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & 0.8 EQx2 E4 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & -0.8 EQx2 E5 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & 0.8 EQY1 E6 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & -0.8 EQY1 E7 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & 0.8 EQY2 E8 = 1.12 D.L. & 1.28 L.L & -0.8 EQY2 E9 = 0.9 D.L. & 1.3 EQX1 E10 = 0.9 D.L. & -1.3 EQX1 E11 = 0.9 D.L. & 1.3 EQX2 E12 = 0.9 D.L. & -1.3 EQX2 E13 = 0.9 D.L. & 1.3 EQY1 E14 = 0.9 D.L. & -1.3 EQY1 E15 = 0.9 D.L. & 1.3 EQY2 E16 = 0.9 D.L. & EQY2 Because of wind is not affected in Egypt We designed under seismic loads only

21 3.3D FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

22

23 Max drift in X Direction= m Max drift in Y Direction= m Allowable Drift D=H/500 =32.8/500 = m Hense, Drift due to Seismic is less than allowabe Safe Drift.

24 4. DESIGN OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS DESIGN OF COLUMNS DESIGN OF SHEAR WALLS

25 4.1 DESIGN OF COLUMNS C1 (30x50) cm Material Properties: F cu = kg/cm2 E c = kg/cm2 F y = kg/cm2 E s = kg/cm2 Bracing System: Braced in both X and Y directions Geometry: Rectangular column Column Type: Short Column Reinforcement: Confinement: Tied Cover = mm Steel Area: 8 φ 16 Steel Ratio =.77% Min Steel Ratio = 0.60% Max Steel Ratio = 4.00% Stirrups: 2 φ 8 Stirrups Spacing = cm

26 C2 (30x70) cm Material Properties: F cu = kg/cm2 E c = kg/cm2 F y = kg/cm2 E s = kg/cm2 Bracing System: Braced in both X and Y directions Geometry: Rectangular column Column Type: Short Column Reinforcement: Confinement: Tied Cover = mm Steel Area: 12 φ 16 Steel Ratio = 1.15 % Min Steel Ratio = 0.60% Max Steel Ratio = 4.00% Stirrups:3 φ 8 Stirrups Spacing = cm

27 C3 (30x100) cm Material Properties: F cu = kg/cm2 E c = kg/cm2 F y = kg/cm2 E s = kg/cm2 Bracing System: Braced in both X and Y directions Geometry: Rectangular column Column Type: Short Column Reinforcement: Confinement: Tied Cover = mm Steel Area: 14 φ 16 Steel Ratio = 0.94 % Min Steel Ratio = 0.60% Max Steel Ratio = 4.00% Stirrups: 3 φ 8 Stirrups Spacing = cm

28 C4 (30x120) cm Material Properties: F cu = kg/cm2 E c = kg/cm2 F y = kg/cm2 E s = kg/cm2 Bracing System: Braced in both X and Y directions Geometry: Rectangular column Column Type: Short Column Reinforcement: Confinement: Tied Cover = mm Steel Area: 18 φ 16 Steel Ratio =1.01% Min Steel Ratio = 0.60% Max Steel Ratio = 4.00% Stirrups: 3 φ 8 Stirrups Spacing = cm

29 C5 (30x130) cm Material Properties: F cu = kg/cm2 E c = kg/cm2 F y = kg/cm2 E s = kg/cm2 Bracing System: Braced in both X and Y directions Geometry: Rectangular column Column Type: Short Column Reinforcement: Confinement: Tied Cover = mm Steel Area: 20 φ 16 Steel Ratio =1.03% Min Steel Ratio = 0.60% Max Steel Ratio = 4.00% Stirrups: 3 φ 8 Stirrups Spacing = cm

30 C6 (30x150) cm Material Properties: F cu = kg/cm2 E c = kg/cm2 F y = kg/cm2 E s = kg/cm2 Bracing System: Braced in both X and Y directions Geometry: Rectangular column Column Type: Short Column Reinforcement: Confinement: Tied Cover = mm Steel Area: 22 φ 16 Steel Ratio =0.98% Min Steel Ratio = 0.60% Max Steel Ratio = 4.00% Stirrups: 2 φ 8 Stirrups Spacing = cm

31 C7 (40x150) cm Material Properties: F cu = kg/cm2 E c = kg/cm2 F y = kg/cm2 E s = kg/cm2 Bracing System: Braced in both X and Y directions Geometry: Rectangular column Column Type: Short Column Reinforcement: Confinement: Tied Cover = mm Steel Area: 24 φ 16 Steel Ratio =0.80% Min Steel Ratio = 0.60% Max Steel Ratio = 4.00% Stirrups: 2 φ 8 Stirrups Spacing = cm

32 m 6 12 m DESIGN OF SHEAR WALLS AND CORE SW1 (30x308) cm Basic Design Parameters Caption = SW1 Default Concrete Strength, Fc = 250 kg/cm^2 Default Concrete Modulus, Ec = kg/cm^2 Maximum Concrete Strain = in/in Rebar Set = User Default Rebar Yeild Strength, Fy = 3600 kg/cm^2 Default Rebar Modulus, Es = kg/cm^2 Default Cover to Rebars = 2.50 cm Maximum Steel Strain = Infinity Transverse Rebar Type = Ties Total Shapes in Section = 1 Consider Slenderness = No Cross-section Shapes Shape Width Height Conc Fc S/S Curve cm cm kg/cm^2 Rectangular Shape PCA Parabola Rebar Properties Basic Section Properties: Total Width = cm Total Height = cm Center, Xo = 0.00 cm Center, Yo = 0.00 cm X-bar (Right) X-bar (Left) Y-bar (Top) Y-bar (Bot) Transformed Properties: Base Material Area, A Inertia, I33 Inertia, I22 Inertia, I32 Radius, r3 Radius, r2 = cm = cm = cm = cm = fc' = 250 kg/cm^2 = 9,000.0 cm^2 = 6.75E+07 cm^4 = 6.75E+05 cm^4 = 0.00E+00 cm^4 = cm = 8.66 cm 3.08

33 m 6 12 m 8 12 SW2 (30x360) cm Basic Design Parameters Caption = SW2 Default Concrete Strength, Fc = 250 kg/cm^2 Default Concrete Modulus, Ec = kg/cm^2 Maximum Concrete Strain = in/in Rebar Set = user Default Rebar Yeild Strength, Fy = 3600 kg/cm^2 Default Rebar Modulus, Es = kg/cm^2 Default Cover to Rebars = 2.50 cm Maximum Steel Strain = Infinity Transverse Rebar Type = Ties Total Shapes in Section = 1 Consider Slenderness = No Cross-section Shapes Shape Width Height Conc Fc S/S Curve cm cm kg/cm^2 Rectangular Shape PCA Parabola Rebar Properties Basic Section Properties: Total Width = cm Total Height = cm Center, Xo = 0.00 cm Center, Yo = 0.00 cm X-bar (Right) X-bar (Left) Y-bar (Top) Y-bar (Bot) = cm = cm = cm = cm Transformed Properties: Base Material = fc' = 250 kg/cm^2 Area, A Inertia, I33 Inertia, I22 Inertia, I32 Radius, r3 Radius, r2 = 1.08E+04 cm^2 = 1.17E+08 cm^4 = 8.10E+05 cm^4 = 0.00E+00 cm^4 = cm = 8.66 cm 3.60

34 m 6 16 m 8 16 SW3 (30x407) cm Basic Design Parameters Caption = SW3 Default Concrete Strength, Fc = 250 kg/cm^2 Default Concrete Modulus, Ec = kg/cm^2 Maximum Concrete Strain = in/in Rebar Set = User Default Rebar Yeild Strength, Fy = 3600 kg/cm^2 Default Rebar Modulus, Es = kg/cm^2 Default Cover to Rebars = 2.50 cm Maximum Steel Strain = Infinity Transverse Rebar Type = Ties Total Shapes in Section = 1 Consider Slenderness = No Cross-section Shapes Shape Width Height Conc Fc S/S Curve cm cm kg/cm^2 Rectangular Shape PCA Parabola Rebar Properties Basic Section Properties Total Width = cm Total Height = cm Center, Xo = 0.00 cm Center, Yo = 0.00 cm X-bar (Right) X-bar (Left) Y-bar (Top) Y-bar (Bot) Transformed Properties: Base Material = fc' Area, A Inertia, I33 Inertia, I22 Inertia, I32 Radius, r3 Radius, r2 = cm = cm = cm = cm = 250 kg/cm^2 = 1.22E+04 cm^2 = 1.69E+08 cm^4 = 9.16E+05 cm^4 = 0.00E+00 cm^4 = cm = 8.66 cm 4.07

35 m 6 12 m 4 12 SW4 (30x252) cm Basic Design Parameters Caption = SW4 Default Concrete Strength, Fc = 250 kg/cm^2 Default Concrete Modulus, Ec = kg/cm^2 Maximum Concrete Strain = in/in Rebar Set = User Default Rebar Yeild Strength, Fy = 3600 kg/cm^2 Default Rebar Modulus, Es = kg/cm^2 Default Cover to Rebars = 2.50 cm Maximum Steel Strain = Infinity Transverse Rebar Type = Ties Total Shapes in Section = 1 Consider Slenderness = No Cross-section Shapes Shape Width Height Conc Fc S/S Curve cm cm kg/cm^2 Rectangular Shape PCA Parabola Basic Section Properties: Total Width Total Height Center, Xo Center, Yo X-bar (Right) X-bar (Left) Y-bar (Top) Y-bar (Bot) Transformed Properties: Base Material = fc' Area, A Inertia, I33 Inertia, I22 Inertia, I32 Radius, r3 Radius, r2 = cm = cm = 0.00 cm = 0.00 cm = cm = cm = cm = cm = 250 kg/cm^2 = 7,560.0 cm^2 = 4.00E+07 cm^4 = 5.67E+05 cm^4 = 0.00E+00 cm^4 = cm = 8.66 cm 2.52

36 m 6 16 m 8 16 SW5 (30x412) cm Basic Design Parameters Caption = SW5 Default Concrete Strength, Fc = 250 kg/cm^2 Default Concrete Modulus, Ec = kg/cm^2 Maximum Concrete Strain = in/in Rebar Set = User Default Rebar Yeild Strength, Fy = 3600 kg/cm^2 Default Rebar Modulus, Es = kg/cm^2 Default Cover to Rebars = 2.50 cm Maximum Steel Strain = Infinity Transverse Rebar Type = Ties Total Shapes in Section = 1 Consider Slenderness = No Cross-section Shapes Shape Width Height Conc Fc S/S Curve cm cm kg/cm^2 Rectangular Shape PCA Parabola Basic Section Properties: Total Width Total Height Center, Xo Center, Yo X-bar (Right) X-bar (Left) Y-bar (Top) Y-bar (Bot) Transformed Properties: Base Material = fc' Area, A Inertia, I33 Inertia, I22 Inertia, I32 Radius, r3 Radius, r2 = cm = cm = 0.00 cm = 0.00 cm = cm = cm = cm = cm = 250 kg/cm^2 = 1.24E+04 cm^2 = 1.75E+08 cm^4 = 9.27E+05 cm^4 = 0.00E+00 cm^4 = cm = 8.66 cm 4.12

37 CORE Basic Design Parameters Caption = core Default Concrete Strength, Fc = 250 kg/cm^2 Default Concrete Modulus, Ec = kg/cm^2 Maximum Concrete Strain = in/in Rebar Set = User Default Rebar Yeild Strength, Fy = 3600 kg/cm^2 Default Rebar Modulus, Es = kg/cm^2 Default Cover to Rebars = 2.50 cm Maximum Steel Strain = Infinity Transverse Rebar Type = Ties Total Shapes in Section = 1 Consider Slenderness = No Cross-section Shapes Shape Width Height Conc Fc S/S Curve cm cm kg/cm^2 Rectangular Shape PCA Parabola Basic Section Properties: Total Width Total Height Center, Xo Center, Yo X-bar (Right) X-bar (Left) Y-bar (Top) Y-bar (Bot) Transformed Properties: Base Material = fc' Area, A Inertia, I33 Inertia, I22 Inertia, I32 Radius, r3 Radius, r2 = cm = cm = cm = cm = cm = cm = cm = cm = 250 kg/cm^2 = 1.62E+04 cm^2 = 5.55E+07 cm^4 = 2.44E+08 cm^4 = 0.00E+00 cm^4 = cm = cm m 6 18 m 6 12 m 6 12 m

38 SW1 SW2

39 SW3 SW4

40 SW5

41 5. DESIGN OF HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS DESIGN OF SLABS DESIGN OF STAIRS DESIGN OF BEAMS

42 5-1-1.Solid Slab (Typical Floors) Thickness of two way slabs =L/35 Simply supported =L/40 Continuous from one side =L/45 Continuous from two sides Take T=12cm for all slabs Check Deflection Allowable deflection = L/250 =3.32/250 =0.013m So actual deflection is < allowable Safe deflection

43 Design of Section Fcu= 25 N/mm^2 Fy= 360 N/mm^2 cover = 20 mm slabs Mu (Kn.m/m') b (mm) t (mm) d (mm) C1 J As (mm^2) As min As choose Rft. safty f 10 safe f 10 safe f 10 safe f 10 safe Use lower mesh in both directions (11, 22) 6ø10 /m`

44 5-2-2.Flat Slab (First Floor) Thickness of slab without drop panel =L/32 External panel =L/36 Internal panel Take T=18cm for all slabs Check Deflection Allowable deflection = L/360 =3.32/360 =0.0092m So actual deflection is.0012 < allowable Safe deflection

45 Design of Section Check Punching Column 1

46 a=c+d/2 = /2=0.38 m b= c+d =1+0.16=1.16 m A net =2* *1.16= 6.83 m2 b0 =1.16+2*0.38=1.92 m Q=Wu *A net =( 0.18* )*6.83= ton qb = Q*103 / b o * d = 5.464*104 / 1920 *160 =0.178 MPa =1.29 MPa qall 0.8(α*d/b ) =1.1 MPa 0.316(a/b +0.5) =2.2 Mpa 1.6 MPa q all = 1.1 MPa q p Safe Punching

47 Column 2

48 a=c+d/2 = =0.46 m b= c+d = =0.86 m A net =2.52*4-0.46*0.86= 9.68 m2 b0 =2*0.86+2*0.46=2.64 m Q=Wu *A net =( 0.18* )*9.68= ton qb = Q*103 / b o * d = 7.744*104 / 2640 *160 =0.183 kg/cm2 =1.29 MPa qall 0.8(α*d/b ) =1.44 MPa 0.316(a/b +0.5) =3.05 Mpa 1.6 MPa q all = 1.1 MPa q p Safe Punching

49 5-1-2.Flat Slab (Ground Floor) Thickness of slab without drop panel =L/32 External panel =L/36 Internal panel Take T=18cm for all slabs Check Deflection Allowable deflection = L/360 =3.32/360 =0.0092m So actual deflection is.0021 < allowable Safe deflection

50 5-2. DESIGN OF STAIRS Using SAP2000 V16

51 MANUAL DESIGN Statically system Concrete dimension L`= = =3.05m T S= for steel 400/600 T S= =13cm Take T S = 15cm Loads Wu=1.5(ts Ɣc +F.c + L.L) W u h =1.5(.2* ) =1.50 t/m 2 W u in =1.5((.2*2.5)/(cos29.4)+.2+.3)=1.61 t/m

52 Straining action Max Moment=6.40 ton.m Design D=ts-cover =20-2=18cm D=C 1 18=C 1 / C 1 =3.9 J=.8 As = cm 2 /m` Use 7Ф16/m`

53 Using Eng M.Zaghlal Program

54 DESIGN OF BEAMS Sec Beam (B1) Input data M U 4.4 t.m f y 3600 Kg/cm 2 Q U 5 t f cu 250 Kg/cm 2 b 12 cm E s 2E+06 Kg/cm 2 t 70 cm d 65 cm * Design of Beams concrete Fcu = 250 kg/cm 2 Steel F y = 3600 kg/cm 2 Sec. Ult. Moment Mu (m.t) Breadth b (cm) Depth t (cm) C1 J As (cm) ɸ Rft. Notes ɸ 12 safe m * Check Of shear in beams Concrete F cu = 300 kg/cm 2 Concrete q all = kg/cm 2 Stirrups F y = 2400 kg/cm Sec. Ult. Shear Breadth Depth q u b (cm) t (cm) Q u (ton) (kg/cm 2 ) As (cm) NO. of Branch ɸ Stirrups Notes ɸ 8 safe

55 0.70 Sec Beam (B2) Input data M U 8.8 t.m f y 3600 Kg/cm 2 Q U 9 t f cu 250 Kg/cm 2 b 12 cm E s 2E+06 Kg/cm 2 t 70 cm d 65 cm * Design of Beams concrete Fcu = 250 kg/cm 2 Steel F y = 3600 kg/cm 2 Sec. Ult. Moment Mu (m.t) Breadth b (cm) Depth t (cm) C1 J As (cm) ɸ Rft. Notes ɸ 12 safe m * Check Of shear in beams Concrete F cu = 250 kg/cm 2 Concrete q all = kg/cm 2 Stirrups F y = 2400 kg/cm Sec. Ult. Shear Breadth Depth q u b (cm) t (cm) Q u (ton) (kg/cm 2 ) As (cm) NO. of Branch ɸ Stirrups Notes ɸ 8 safe

56 0.70 Sec Beam (B3) Input data M U 13 t.m f y 3600 Kg/cm 2 Q U 9 t f cu 250 Kg/cm 2 b 12 cm E s 2E+06 Kg/cm 2 t 70 cm d 65 cm * Design of Beams concrete Fcu = 250 kg/cm 2 Steel F y = 3600 kg/cm 2 Sec. Ult. Moment Mu (m.t) Breadth b (cm) Depth t (cm) C1 J As (cm) ɸ Rft. Notes 2 ɸ 16 2 ɸ 12 safe ( With the same way shear in beam safe at 6 ɸ 8 / m \ ) m

57 0.70 Sec Beam (B4) Input data M U 15 t.m f y 3600 Kg/cm 2 Q U 10 t f cu 250 Kg/cm 2 b 12 cm E s 2E+06 Kg/cm 2 t 70 cm d 65 cm * Design of Beams concrete Fcu = 250 kg/cm 2 Steel F y = 3600 kg/cm 2 Sec. Ult. Moment Mu (m.t) Breadth b (cm) Depth t (cm) C1 J As (cm) ɸ Rft. Notes ɸ 16 safe (With the same way shear in beam safe at 6 ɸ 8 / m \ ) m

58 0.70 Sec Beam (B5) Input data M U 18 t.m f y 3600 Kg/cm 2 Q U 13.8 t f cu 250 Kg/cm 2 b 25 cm E s 2E+06 Kg/cm 2 t 70 cm d 65 cm * Design of Beams concrete Fcu = 250 kg/cm 2 Steel F y = 3600 kg/cm 2 Sec. Ult. Moment Mu (m.t) Breadth b (cm) Depth t (cm) C1 J As (cm) ɸ Rft. Notes ɸ 16 safe m * Check Of shear in beams Concrete F cu = 250 kg/cm 2 Concrete q all = kg/cm 2 Stirrups F y = 2400 kg/cm Sec. Ult. Shear Breadth Depth q u b (cm) t (cm) Q u (ton) (kg/cm 2 ) As (cm) NO. of Branch ɸ Stirrups Notes ɸ 8 safe

59 FINAL DESIGN OF BEAMS * Design of Beams concrete Fcu = 250 kg/cm 2 Steel F y = 3600 kg/cm 2 Sec. Ult. Moment Mu (m.t) Breadth b (cm) Depth t (cm) C1 J As (cm) ɸ R.F.T Notes ɸ 12 safe ɸ 12 safe ɸ 16 2 ɸ 12 safe ɸ 16 safe ɸ 16 safe Sec. * Check Of shear in beams Concrete F cu = 250 kg/cm 2 Concrete q all = kg/cm 2 Stirrups F y = 2400 kg/cm 2 Ult. Shear Breadth Depth q u b (cm) t (cm) Q u (ton) (kg/cm 2 ) As (cm) NO. of Branch ɸ Stirrups Notes ɸ 8 safe ɸ 8 safe ɸ 8 safe ɸ 8 safe ɸ 8 safe

60 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION DESIGN OF RAFT DESIGN OF PILE CAP

61 6-1.SHALLOW FOUNDATION (RAFT) Thickness of Raft Mx=72.25 ton.m D= D= =80.64 cm Take D=110 cm Check Stress under raft due to axial loads only -Get eccentricity Normal= t M x = t.m M y = t.m Y`= M x /N = 11.2 m X`= M y /N =19.28 m e x = = 0.2 m e y = = 0.13 m In order to eliminate eccentricity in Y Direction We took 30cm projection of raft in street in Y Direction so M x = zero -Get Additional moments due to eccentricity M Y = N*e y = *0.2= t.m Drawing showing that

62 11.07 Center of Mass and Center of Area Y X X Y

63 Get Properties of Section Area =821 m2 Iy = m4 0.5 ton / m X =±18.84 m Allowable stress q all = q allnet + ɣs *D F - ɣ p.c * t p.c - ɣ R.c * t R.c L.L = * *.3-2.5* = t/m2 -Actual stress F max = - * x = - - = t/m2 < t/m2 Less than allowable (safe) F min = - + * x = - + = t/m2 < zero No tension stress (safe)

64 6-2.Deep FOUNDATION (Pile Cap) Pile cap Manual Calculations

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).

More information

4.3 Moment Magnification

4.3 Moment Magnification CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column

More information

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000

More information

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Introduction As we stated in Chapter 3, foundations are considered to be shallow if if [D (3 4)B]. Shallow foundations have several advantages: minimum

More information

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23

More information

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes

More information

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake

More information

Rigid and Braced Frames

Rigid and Braced Frames RH 331 Note Set 12.1 F2014abn Rigid and raced Frames Notation: E = modulus of elasticit or Young s modulus F = force component in the direction F = force component in the direction FD = free bod diagram

More information

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent

More information

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed Prepared by : Date : Verified by : Date : Project : Ref Calculation Output Design of RCC Chimney :- 1) Dimensions of Chimney and Forces 200 Unit weight of Fire Brick Lining 19000 N/m3 100 Height of Fire

More information

PROPOSED SATSANG HALL TECHNICAL REPORT

PROPOSED SATSANG HALL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED SATSANG HALL - VERTICAL STRIP V1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

Entrance exam Master Course

Entrance exam Master Course - 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points

More information

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...

More information

spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb

spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb X Z Y spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: 00000-0000000-4-2D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A23.3 - Kt Revised.slb Project: CSA A23.3 - Kt Torsional Stiffness Illustration Frame: Engineer:

More information

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,

More information

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR: MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1 SEMESTER: V 1) Find the least moment of Inertia about the centroidal axes X-X and Y-Y of an unequal angle section 125 mm 75 mm 10 mm as shown in figure 2) Determine

More information

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified

More information

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State

More information

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No. CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus

More information

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602 Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded

More information

Fayoum University. Dr.: Youssef Gomaa Youssef

Fayoum University. Dr.: Youssef Gomaa Youssef Fayoum University Faculty o Engineering Department o Civil Engineering CE 40: Part Shallow Foundation Design Lecture No. (6): Eccentric Footing Dr.: Yousse Gomaa Yousse Eccentric Footing Eccentric ooting:

More information

This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected.

This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected. COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAME DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced

More information

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes

More information

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6 Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L

More information

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 2002 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN BS 8110-97 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced

More information

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0. Example (8.1): Using the ACI Code approximate structural analysis, design for a warehouse, a continuous one-way solid slab supported on beams 4.0 m apart as shown in Figure 1. Assume that the beam webs

More information

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC ENERGY DIAGRAM ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS INELASTIC WORK DONE HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION DUCTILITY

More information

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department

More information

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete

More information

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections 4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015

More information

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Practical Design to Eurocode 2 Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,

More information

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] A typical floor system of a lecture hall is to be designed as a ribbed slab. The joists which are spaced at 400mm are supported by girders. The overall depth of the slab

More information

USER BULLETIN 3: DETERMINATION OF UNSUPPORTED LENGTH RATIO L/Db

USER BULLETIN 3: DETERMINATION OF UNSUPPORTED LENGTH RATIO L/Db USER BULLETIN 3: DETERMINATION OF UNSUPPORTED LENGTH RATIO L/Db The unsupported length ratio (L/Db) is calculated by the automatic Sectional modeler spreadsheet using Dhakal and Maekawa [1]. This method

More information

Mechanics of Structure

Mechanics of Structure S.Y. Diploma : Sem. III [CE/CS/CR/CV] Mechanics of Structure Time: Hrs.] Prelim Question Paper Solution [Marks : 70 Q.1(a) Attempt any SIX of the following. [1] Q.1(a) Define moment of Inertia. State MI

More information

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A ) Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a

More information

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building

More information

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement. Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab

More information

SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA

SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA (Declared as Deemed-to-be University under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956, Vide notification No.F.9.9/92-U-3 dated 26 th May 1993 of the Govt. of

More information

A Comparative Study on RC Frame Structure Considering Lead Rubber Bearing and Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing

A Comparative Study on RC Frame Structure Considering Lead Rubber Bearing and Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing A Comparative Study on RC Frame Structure Considering Lead Rubber Bearing and Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing Dr. H.M.Somasekharaiah 1, Er. Dharmesh. N 2, Mohammed Ghouse 3 Professor, Department of Civil

More information

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5 As = 736624/(0.5*413.69) = 3562 mm 2 (ADAPT 3569 mm 2, B29, C6) Data Block 27 - Compressive Stresses The initial compressive strength, f ci, is the strength entered in the Material/Concrete input screen.

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 30 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of

More information

DESIGN REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

DESIGN REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS DESIGN OF REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS Contents CHAPTER 1.0 General: 1.1 Symbols 1. Materials 1..1 Cement 1.. Aggregate 1..3 Water 1..4 Admixtures 1..5 Reinforcement CHAPTER.0 Concrete:.1

More information

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder

More information

Bending and Shear in Beams

Bending and Shear in Beams Bending and Shear in Beams Lecture 3 5 th October 017 Contents Lecture 3 What reinforcement is needed to resist M Ed? Bending/ Flexure Section analysis, singly and doubly reinforced Tension reinforcement,

More information

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009)

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009) LECTURE NOTES ON REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009) III B. Tech I semester (Regulation- R16) Mr. Gude Ramakrishna Associate Professor DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF

More information

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings Fawad A. Najam Pennung Warnitchai Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand Email: fawad.ahmed.najam@ait.ac.th A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic

More information

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia DESIGN OF STAIRCASE Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction T N T G N G R h Flight Span, L Landing T = Thread

More information

FLEXIBLE BUILDING BASEMENT WITH MULTICOLUMNS

FLEXIBLE BUILDING BASEMENT WITH MULTICOLUMNS 011 FLEXIBLE BUILDING BASEMENT WITH MULTICOLUMNS Luis CARRILLO-GUTIERR 1 SUMMARY This invention is a passive seismic isolation system, which taking advantage of the resilience and flexibility that characterise

More information

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2 PEER/SSC Tall Building Design Case study #2 Typical Plan View at Ground Floor and Below Typical Plan View at 2 nd Floor and Above Code Design Code Design Shear Wall properties Shear wall thickness and

More information

Beam Design and Deflections

Beam Design and Deflections Beam Design and Deflections tation: a = name for width dimension A = name for area Areq d-adj = area required at allowable stress when shear is adjusted to include self weight Aweb = area of the web of

More information

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major

More information

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials) For updated version, please click on http://ocw.ump.edu.my REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1 Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials) by Dr. Sharifah Maszura Syed Mohsin Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth

More information

EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS

EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS Atsuhiko MACHIDA And Khairy H ABDELKAREEM SUMMARY Nonlinear D FEM was utilized to carry out inelastic

More information

Associate Professor. Tel:

Associate Professor. Tel: DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING IIT DELHI Dr. Suresh Bhalla Associate Professor Tel: 2659-1040 Email: Sbhalla@civil.iitd.ac.in FOUNDATIONS Geotechnical Engineer Structural Engineer Location and depth criteria

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Young s modulus E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Area1=900mm 2 Area2=400mm 2 Area3=625mm

More information

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft. ME 323 - Final Exam Name December 15, 2015 Instructor (circle) PROEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) Krousgrill 11:30AM-12:20PM Ghosh 2:30-3:20PM Gonzalez 12:30-1:20PM Zhao 4:30-5:20PM M (x) y 20 kip ft 0.2

More information

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS Konstantinos CHRISTIDIS 1, Emmanouil VOUGIOUKAS 2 and Konstantinos TREZOS 3 ABSTRACT

More information

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Downloaded from   Downloaded from   / 1 PURWANCHAL UNIVERSITY III SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION-2002 LEVEL : B. E. (Civil) SUBJECT: BEG256CI, Strength of Material Full Marks: 80 TIME: 03:00 hrs Pass marks: 32 Candidates are required to give their

More information

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections

More information

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >.

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >. 11 LIMITATION OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO----( ) 1-Nonsway (braced) frames: The ACI Code, Section 6.2.5 recommends the following limitations between short and long columns in braced (nonsway) frames: 1. The

More information

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings

More information

7.2 Design of minaret: Geometry:

7.2 Design of minaret: Geometry: 7. Design of minaret: Geometry: The figure below shows the longitudinal section in the minaret and the cross section will be shown when start calculate the self-weight of each section. Figure 7..1 Longitudinal

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

R13. II B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations, Jan MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, AE, MTE) PART-A

R13. II B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations, Jan MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, AE, MTE) PART-A SET - 1 II B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations, Jan - 2015 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, AE, MTE) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 70 Note: 1. Question Paper consists of two parts (Part-A and Part-B)

More information

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil

More information

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1. C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional

More information

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete cross-section C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient

More information

Assignment 1 - actions

Assignment 1 - actions Assignment 1 - actions b = 1,5 m a = 1 q kn/m 2 Determine action on the beam for verification of the ultimate limit state. Axial distance of the beams is 1 to 2 m, cross section dimensions 0,45 0,20 m

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 25 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of

More information

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 Structure & Loads Determine forces that act on structures causing it to deform, bend, and stretch Forces push/pull on objects Structures are loaded by: > Dead loads permanent

More information

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS Unit 2: Unit code: QCF Level: Credit value: 15 Engineering Science L/601/10 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL COLUMNS 1. Be able to determine the behavioural characteristics of elements of static engineering systems

More information

OP-023. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT

OP-023. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT Page 1 of 9 WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS GSJ Compiled by : Checked by KYW : LSS Approved by : OP-23. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT INTERPRETATION

More information

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular

More information

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum

More information

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of

More information

A Mathematical Formulation to Estimate the Fundamental Period of High-Rise Buildings Including Flexural-Shear Behavior and Structural Interaction

A Mathematical Formulation to Estimate the Fundamental Period of High-Rise Buildings Including Flexural-Shear Behavior and Structural Interaction Journal of Solid Mechanics Vol. 6, No. (014) pp. 1-134 A Mathematical Formulation to Estimate the Fundamental Period of High-Rise Buildings Including Flexural-Shear Behavior and Structural Interaction

More information

Prof. A. Meher Prasad. Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras

Prof. A. Meher Prasad. Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Prof. A. Meher Prasad Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras email: prasadam@iitm.ac.in Dynamic - Loads change with time Nonlinear - Loaded beyond Elastic Limit Type Usual

More information

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile Deep Foundations 2 Load Capacity of a Single Pile All calculations of pile capacity are approximate because it is almost impossible to account for the variability of soil types and the differences in the

More information

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Introduction A beam is a long, slender structural member that resists loads that are generally applied transverse (perpendicular) to its longitudinal axis.

More information

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify

More information

Special edition paper

Special edition paper Development of New Aseismatic Structure Using Escalators Kazunori Sasaki* Atsushi Hayashi* Hajime Yoshida** Toru Masuda* Aseismatic reinforcement work is often carried out in parallel with improvement

More information

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 2.5 x 6 Design Span (L):

More information

999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01

999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01 DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using several methods to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. 1. SAP2000 Nonlinear with axial-moment

More information

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Serviceability Deflection calculation Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning

More information

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION Introduction UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION A foundation is a integral part of the structure which transfer the load of the superstructure to the soil. A foundation is that member which provides support for

More information

An Investigation on the Correlation of Inter-story Drift and Performance Objectives in Conventional RC Frames

An Investigation on the Correlation of Inter-story Drift and Performance Objectives in Conventional RC Frames Available online at www.ijournalse.org Emerging Science Journal Vol., No. 3, June, 18 An Investigation on the Correlation of Inter-story Drift and Performance Objectives in Conventional RC Frames Saeed

More information

Suspended high-rise. Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1

Suspended high-rise. Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Suspended high-rise Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-06 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Suspended high-rise 1 Gravity load path 2 Differential deflection 3 Prestress to

More information

Comparative Study of Strengths of Two-Way Rectangular Continuous Slabs with Two Openings Parallel to Long Side and Short Side

Comparative Study of Strengths of Two-Way Rectangular Continuous Slabs with Two Openings Parallel to Long Side and Short Side Volume 6, No. 2, February 17 9 Comparative Study of Strengths of Two-Way Rectangular Continuous Slabs with Two Openings Parallel to Long Side and Short Side D. Manasa, Assistant Professor, Gayatri Vidya

More information

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310

More information

IVIL.COM, C. English - Arabic. Arrow Assume Assumption Available Average Axes Axial Axis

IVIL.COM, C. English - Arabic. Arrow Assume Assumption Available Average Axes Axial Axis Abrupt Action Accuracy Accurate Advantage Algebra Algebraic Algebraic equation English - Arabic Algebraic expression Algebraic sum Allow Allowable Ambiguous Analyze Analysis f sections Structural analysis

More information

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column: APRIL 2015 DR. Z s CORNER Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications Topics covered in this month s column: PE Exam Specifications (Geotechnical) Transportation (Horizontal Curves)

More information

Only for Reference Page 1 of 18

Only for Reference  Page 1 of 18 Only for Reference www.civilpddc2013.weebly.com Page 1 of 18 Seat No.: Enrolment No. GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY PDDC - SEMESTER II EXAMINATION WINTER 2013 Subject Code: X20603 Date: 26-12-2013 Subject

More information

Earthquake Simulation Tests on a 1:5 Scale 10 - Story RC Residential Building Model

Earthquake Simulation Tests on a 1:5 Scale 10 - Story RC Residential Building Model Earthquake Simulation Tests on a 1:5 Scale 1 - Story RC Residential Building Model H. S. Lee, S. J. Hwang, K. B. Lee, & C. B. Kang Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea S. H. Lee & S. H. Oh Pusan

More information