Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures"

Transcription

1 Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings or mat foundation = 1.4 for soil sites S S = the mapped MCE R short-period spectral response acceleration per ASCE but S S need not exceed 1.5 Seismic Base Shear, V Strength Design force leveli ASCE The seismic base shear in a given direction shall be determined in accordance with the following: FSDS V W ASCE 7 ( ) R where: F = 1.0 for one-story buildings (above grade plane) = 1.1 for two-story buildings (above grade plane) = 1.2 for three-story buildings (above grade plane) R = Response modification factor per ASCE 7 Table (not Table ) W = effective seismic weight per ASCE items 1 to 5 One-Story Building - 1.0S V R DS W Two-Story Building - 1.1S V R DS W Three-Story Building - 1.2S V R DS W NOTE: When using the Simplified Design Procedure of ASCE , it is not necessary to determine the Redundancy Factor ( ) when calculating the earthquake forces on the elements of the structure (e.g., shear walls, braces, columns, etc.) since is not used to determine E h : i.e., E h = Q E ASCE 7 ( ) Vertical Distribution, F x ASCE The force at each level shall be calculated using the following equation: wx Fx V ASCE 7 ( ) W or FSDS Fx wx R Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 1-67

2 Chapter 9 IBC Chapter 23 Wood Table 9.2 Blocked WSP Diaphragms (Ref. 13 Table 4.2A) courtesy, American Wood Council, Leesburg, VA Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 1-131

3 Part 2 Example Problems Solution: A.) N-S DIRECTION: L = 125, d = Maximum Unit (Roof) Diaphragm Shear, r w s = V / L = (35,000 lbs) / 125 = 280 plf V 1 = V 3 = w s L / 2 = (280 plf )(125 ) / 2 = 17,500 lbs roof 1 = 3 = V 1 / d = (17,500 lbs) / 50 = 350 plfi (SD force level) 2. Maximum Unit Wall Shear, w By inspection, the maximum unit wall shear will occur on line 3 (i.e., V 1 = V 3, Σb 3 = 25 < Σb 1 = 30 ) Wall Line 1: V 1 = V / 2 & total shear wall width (i.e., length) - Σb 1 = 30 wall 1 = V 1 / Σb 1 = (17,500 lbs) / 30 = 583 plfi Wall Line 3: V 3 = V / 2 & total shear wall width (i.e., length) - Σb 3 = 25 wall 3 = V 3 / Σb 3 = (17,500 lbs) / 25 = 700 plfi governs (SD force level) (SD force level) 3. Maximum Chord Force on lines A & B, CF max. CF = w s L 2 / 8d = (280 plf )(125 ) 2 / 8(50 ) = 10,940 lbsi (SD force level) 4. Maximum Drag Force, F d Drag Force - Line 1 Drag Force - Line 3 By inspection, the maximum drag force will occur on line 3 - Wall Line 1: roof 1 = 350 plf F d = 1 (10 ) = (350 plf )(10 ) = 3,500 lbs (SD force level) Wall Line 3: roof 3 = 350 plf F d = 3 (25 ) = (350 plf )(25 ) = 8,750 lbs governs (SD force level) 2-32 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

4 Part 2 Example Problems B.) N-S DIRECTION: Diaphragm span = L 1 = L 2 = L / 2 = 62.5, d = Maximum Unit (Roof) Diaphragm Shear, r The addition of the interior shear wall on line 2 will create two diaphragms that span equal amounts (e.g., L 1 = L 2 = L / 2). One diaphragm spans from line 1 to line 2, and the other diaphragm spans from line 2 to line 3. w s = V / L = (35,000 lbs) / 125 = 280 plf V 1 = V 3 = w s (L 1 / 2) = w s (L 2 / 2) = (280 plf )(62.5 ) / 2 = 8,750 lbs roof 1 = 3 = V 1 / d = (8,750 lbs) / 50 = 175 plfi (SD force level) From Part A.1 - roof 1 = 3 = 350 plf 50% reduction in max. unit (roof) diaphragm sheari 2. Maximum Unit Wall Shear, w By inspection, the maximum unit wall shear will occur on line 2 & 3 - Wall Line 1: V 1 = V / 4 & total shear wall length, Σb 1 = 30 wall 1 = V 1 / Σb 1 = (8,750 lbs) / 30 = 291 plfi Wall Line 2: V 2 = V / 2 & total shear wall length, Σb 2 = 50 wall 2 = V 2 / Σb 2 = (17,500 lbs) / 50 = 350 plfi governs (SD force level) (SD force level) Wall Line 3: V 3 = V / 4 & total shear wall length, Σb 3 = 25 wall 3 = V 3 / Σb 3 = (8,750 lbs) / 25 = 350 plfi governs From Part A.2 - wall 3 = 700 plf 50% reduction in max. unit wall sheari (SD force level) 3. Maximum Chord Force on lines A & B, CF max. CF = w s (L 1 ) 2 / 8d = (280 plf )(62.5 ) 2 / 8(50 ) = 2,730 lbsi (SD force level) From Part A.3 - max. chord force CF = 10,940 lbs 4. Maximum Drag Force, F d 75% reduction in maximum chord forcei Drag Force - Line 1 Drag Force - Line 2 Drag Force - Line 3 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 2-33

5 Part 2 Example Problems Problem #16 Given: Single-story Office building S DS = 0.95 Seismic Design Category D Building Frame System o Special reinforced masonry shear walls o Flexible (metal deck) roof diaphragm Roof dead load, D = 16 psf Roof snow load, S = 100 psf 8 masonry wall dead load, W w = 85 psf Plan Wall Section Find: A.) N-S DIRECTION: 1. Design seismic force to diaphragm, w s 2. Unit roof shear on lines A & B, ν r 3. Maximum chord force on lines 1 & 2, CF 4. Drag force diagram on lines A & B, F d B.) E-W DIRECTION: 1. Design seismic force to diaphragm, w s 2. Unit roof shear on lines 1 & 2, ν r 3. Maximum chord force on lines A & B, CF 4. Shear Force to walls 1A & 1B 5. Drag force diagram on lines 1 & 2, F d NOTE: Neglect the wall openings (i.e., dashed lines) shown in the Plan when determining the weight of the masonry walls tributary to the roof diaphragm. Therefore, assume the entire perimeter is surrounded by solid walls, as shown on the Wall Section, with no openings. Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 2-35

6 Part 2 Example Problems Solution: Office building = Risk Category II 2012 IBC Table S DS = 0.95 given I e = 1.0 R = 5½ ASCE 7 Table : Risk Category II ASCE 7 Table , item B.16: Building Frame System special reinforced masonry shear walls NOTE: by observation, for a single story building T < T S ASCE 7 (12.8-2) will govern C S Seismic Response Coefficient, C S SDS C S = = ( R Ie) (0.95) ( ) Seismic Base Shear, V = ASCE 7 (12.8-2) V = C S W ASCE 7 (12.8-1) = W use for shear wall design Diaphragm Design Force at Roof, F px F px n Fi i= x = w n px ASCE 7 ( ) w i= x i For a single-story building (i.e., F 1 = V): CSW F p1 = wp1= C S w p1 = w p1 W F p1 0.4 S DS I e w p1 = 0.4 (0.95)(1.0) w p1 = w p1 maximum F p1 0.2 S DS I e w p1 = 0.2 (0.95)(1.0) w p1 = w p1 minimum use for roof diaphragm design A.) N-S DIRECTION: L = 70, d = Design Seismic Force to Diaphragm, w s = f p1 = F p1 /L roof DL + 20% snow exterior walls w s = f p1 = [(16 psf + 20% 100 psf)(40 ) + (85 psf)(14 /2 + 2 )(2 walls)] = 564 plfi 2. Unit Roof Shear on lines A & B, ν r V A = V B = w s L / 2 = (564 plf)(70 /2) = 19,740 lbs Unit roof shear, ν A = ν B = V A / d = (19,740 lbs) / 40 = 494 plfi 3. Maximum Chord Force on lines 1 & 2, CF max. M = w s L 2 / 8 = (564 plf)(70 ) 2 / 8 = 345,450 lb-ft max. CF = (345,450 lb-ft) / 40 = 8,636 lbsi (SD/LRFD force level) (SD/LRFD force level) 2-36 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

7 Part 2 Example Problems 4. Drag Force Diagram on lines A & B, F d roof ν A = ν B = 494 plf Wall Line A: F d = 0 lbs Wall Line B: F d = (494 plf)(20 ) = 9,880 lbs (SD/LRFD force level) Drag Force Line A Drag Force Line B NOTE: The actual design of the collector elements and their connections would need to consider the overstrength factor as required by ASCE for this structure assigned to SDC = D (i.e., design for Ω 0 Q E where Q E is the drag force determined above see p ). B.) E-W DIRECTION: L = 40, d = Design Seismic Force to Diaphragm, w s = f p1 = F p1 /L roof DL + 20% snow exterior walls w s = f p1 = [(16 psf + 20% 100 psf)(70 ) + (85 psf)(14 /2 + 2 )(2 walls)] = 770 plfi 2. Unit Roof Shear on lines 1 & 2, ν r V 1 = V 2 = w s L / 2 = (770 plf)(40 /2) = 15,400 lbs Roof ν 1 = ν 2 = V 1 / d = (15,400 lbs) / 70 = 220 plfi 3. Maximum Chord Force on lines A & B, CF max. M = w s L 2 / 8 = (770 plf)(40 ) 2 / 8 = 154,000 lb-ft max. CF = (154,000 lb-ft) / 70 = 2,200 lbsi (SD/LRFD force level) (SD/LRFD force level) 4. Shear Force to walls 1A & 1B Relative Rigidities: assume cantilever walls, Table D1 - Relative Rigidity of Cantilever Shear Walls / Piers (Appendix D, p. 5-20) Wall 1A: H/D = 14 /11 = 1.27 Table D1 (p. 5-20) R 1A = Wall 1B: H/D = 14 /22 = 0.64 Table D1 (p. 5-20) R 1B = ΣR = R 1A + R 1B = = Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 2-37

8 Part 2 Example Problems NOTE: For the purpose of determining the Drag Force Diagrams in part 5, the force level based on a C S = will continue to be used. BUT, for shear wall design use of C S = would be appropriate, which is equal to (0.173 / 0.190) times the force level being used below. Wall 1A: V 1A = V 1 (R 1A / ΣR) = (15,400 lbs)(0.833 / 4.202) = 3,050 lbsi for drag force (SD/LRFD force level) [ = (3,050 lbs) (0.173 / 0.190) = 2,780 lbs for shear wall design ] Wall 1B: V 1B = V 1 (R 1B / ΣR) = (15,400 lbs)(3.369 / 4.202) = 12,350 lbsi for drag force (SD/LRFD force level) [ = (12,350 lbs) (0.173 / 0.190) = 11,240 lbs for shear wall design ] 5. Drag Force Diagram on lines 1 & 2, F d roof ν 1 = ν 2 = 220 plf Wall Line 1: F d = (220 plf)(11 ) 3,050 lbs = 630 lbs = (220 plf)(31 ) 3,050 lbs = 3,770 lbs max = (220 plf)(53 ) (3,050 lbs + 12,350 lbs) = 3,740 lbs = (220 plf)(70 ) (3,050 lbs + 12,350 lbs) = 0 lbs OK Drag Force Line 1 Wall Line 2: F d = (220 plf)(11 ) = 2,420 lbs = (220 plf)(53 ) 15,400 lbs = 3,740 lbs max = (220 plf)(70 ) 15,400 lbs = 0 lbs OK Drag Force Line 2 See NOTE on p regarding use of Ω 0 Q E for design of collector elements and their connections 2-38 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

9 Part 2 Example Problems Problem #21 Given: Reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall Soil weight, γ = 110 pcf Allowable soil bearing pressure, q s : o 3,000 psf dead + live load o 4,000 psf total load (including seismic or wind) Sliding friction factor, µ = 0.40 Resisting passive pressure: o K P = 3.18 o Resultant height, y P = D 3 Assume that concrete stem wall is included in static plus seismic pressure (P AE ) Static active pressure coefficient: o K A = o Resultant height, y A = H 3 Static plus seismic active pressure coefficient: o K AE = o Resultant height, y AE = 0. 45H Assume backfill is fully drained (i.e., no hydrostatic pressure). Neglect vertical component of seismic force. Assume static plus seismic active pressure is given at an allowable stress level (ASD) Find: A.) STATIC CONDITION, K A : 1. Sliding factor of safety 2. Overturning factor of safety 3. Maximum soil bearing pressure (at toe) Cantilever Retaining Wall Section B.) STATIC PLUS SEISMIC CONDITION, K AE : 1. Sliding factor of safety 2. Overturning factor of safety 3. Maximum soil bearing pressure (at toe) 2-58 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

10 Part 2 Example Problems B.) STATIC PLUS SEISMIC CONDITION, K AE : Static plus Seismic Active Soil Pressure Total static plus seismic active force, P AE 2 P AE = ½ K AE γ H = ½ (0.538)(110 pcf)(11.25 ) 2 = 3,745 lbs/ft resultant height, y AE = 0.45 H = 0.45 (11.25 ) = 5.06 Total static passive (resisting) force, P P (from part A) P P = 885 lbs/ft resultant height, y P = D 3 = 0.75 Weights (from part A) Resultant weight, R = ΣW = 7,284 lbs/ft 1. Sliding Factor of Safety Sliding force, F S = P AE = 3,745 lbs/ft Resisting force, F R = passive force + friction force = P P + µ ΣW = 885 lbs/ft (7,284 lbs/ft) = 3,799 lbs/ft Sliding factor of safety, FS = F F R S 3,799 = 3,745 = 1.01 < 1.1 NG! NOTE: 2012 IBC , and most Geotechnical reports, permit a one-third increase in the allowable bearing pressure where the alternative basic load combinations of IBC include wind loads (W ) or earthquake loads (E ). Furthermore, IBC exception allows a minimum factor of safety of 1.1 (i.e., FS = 1.5 / 1.33 = 1.1) for retaining wall sliding and overturning where earthquake loads are included. Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 2-61

11 Part 2 Example Problems 2. Overturning Factor of Safety Overturning moment, OTM = P y AE AE = (3,745lbs/ft)(0.45)(11.25 ) = 18,960 lb-ft/ft Resisting moment, (from part A.2) RM = 27,550 lb-ft/ft Overturning factor of safety, FS = RM OTM 27,550 = 18,960 = 1.45 > 1.1 OK 3. Maximum Soil Bearing Pressure ( 27,550 18,960) RM OTM x = = = 1.18 R 7,284 eccentricity from centerline of footing, e = L 2 x = (6.5 )/ = 2.07 Soil Bearing Pressure e = 2.07 > L/6 = 6.5 /6 = 1.08 soil pressure distribution is triangular for a triangular soil pressure distribution, 2R maximum soil pressure, q s = 3x minimum soil pressure, q s = 0 therefore, max. q s = 2 (7,284) = 4,120 psf/ft > 4,000 psf allowable (D + L + seismic) NG! 3 (1.18' ) 2-62 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

12 Part 3 Multiple Choice Problems 4.19 What is the approximate fundamental period (T a ) of a 110 foot tall steel eccentrically braced frame (steel EBF) building? a second b second c second d second 4.20 What is the approximate fundamental period (T a ) of a 5 story building using entirely intermediate steel moment frames (steel IMF), with all story heights greater than 10 feet? a second b second c second d second 4.21 What is the approximate fundamental period (T a ) of a 195 foot tall special steel moment frame (steel SMF) building? a second b second c second d second 4.22 What is the approximate fundamental period (T a ) of a 35 foot tall Dual System building (w/ steel SMF s & reinforced concrete shear walls)? a second b second c second d second 4.23 Given T S = 0.6 second & Seismic Design Category D (SDC = D), which of the following structures would not be permitted the use of the Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) procedure? a. 200 foot tall regular structure with T = 2.4 seconds b. 3-story light-frame irregular structure of Risk Category II c. 150 foot tall structure with T = 2.0 seconds and reentrant corner irregularity d. All of the above e. Both a & c An owner proposes to construct an office building of Seismic Design Category D using steel special concentrically braced frames (SCBF) as the vertical seismic force-resisting elements (in both principal directions). Answer questions 4.24 to What response modification coefficient (R) should be used for seismic design? a. 8 b. 7 c. 6 d. 3¼ Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 3-19

13 Part 3 Multiple Choice Problems 6.13 What component amplification factor (a p ) & component response modification factor (R p ) would be appropriate for a boiler attached to a building structure? a. a p = 1 & R p = 2½ b. a p = 2½ & R p = 2½ c. a p = 1 & R p = 6 d. a p = 2½ & R p = When anchoring structural walls to a roof or floor diaphragm assigned to Seismic Design Category D, and where the purlin anchors are provided at a spacing of 4 feet (i.e., 4'-0" o.c.), the design anchorage force (F p ) shall not be less than: a. 280 lbs per anchor b lbs per anchor c. 0.4 S DS K a I e W p d. 0.2 K a I e W p 6.15 Structural walls (e.g., concrete or masonry walls) are required to be designed to resist bending between purlin anchors where the anchor spacing exceeds: a. 4 times the thickness of the wall b. 4 feet c. 6 feet d. None of the above 6.16 Given one-story Police Station with 8 thick concrete exterior walls with weight (W Wall ) of 100 psf & S DS = These structural walls shall be designed to span vertically from foundation to roof level to resist a force normal to the surface of the wall (F p ) equal to: a. 10 psf b. 25 psf c. 37 psf d. 62 psf 6.17 Given one-story County Jail with 8 thick masonry exterior walls with weight (W Wall ) of 85 psf, wall height of 14 feet with 3 foot parapet, a concrete (rigid) roof diaphragm and S DS = Determine the governing wall anchorage force (F p ) at the rigid roof diaphragm that spans 100 feet between shear walls. a. 210 plf b. 380 plf c. 480 plf d. 580 plf 6.18 Given a three-story Office building assigned to Seismic Design Category D with 8 thick masonry exterior walls with weight (W Wall ) of 85 psf, 12 foot story heights, flexible roof and floor diaphragms that span 80 feet between shear walls, and S DS = Determine the governing wall anchorage force (F p ) at the Level 1 (and Level 2) flexible floor diaphragms. a. 210 plf b. 370 plf c. 560 plf d plf 3-40 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

14 Part 3 Multiple Choice Problems 9.27 What is the maximum length-width ratio for the blocked wood structural panel (WSP) horizontal diaphragms (second floor and roof)? a. 2:1 b. 2½:1 c. 3:1 d. 4: Given a structure assigned to Seismic Design Category C with a typical subdiaphragm span of 20 feet, what would be the minimum required depth of each structural subdiaphragm? a b. 8-0 c. 6-8 d What is the minimum seismic design force for structural subdiaphragms that are part of a flexible diaphragm in SDC = C, D, E or F? a. F px L plf b. F x L plf c. 0.2KaIeW p d. 280 plf Given a single-story wood frame Police Station assigned to Seismic Design Category F with wood structural panels used for the flexible roof diaphragm and for the shear walls. The roof diaphragm is to use 19/32 rated sheathing with 10d common nails (3 x ) fastened to 2x nominal framing members, with blocking omitted at intermediate joints. The shear walls are to use 15/32 Structural I sheathing with 10d common nails (3 x ) fastened to 2x nominal framing members. Answer questions 9.30 through What is the allowable unit shear for the roof diaphragm with seismic loads perpendicular to the continuous panel joints? a. 285 plf b. 255 plf c. 215 plf d. 190 plf 9.31 What is the allowable unit shear for a shear wall with 4 o.c. edge nailing, a height (h) of 12-0 and a width (b) of 8-6 resisting seismic loads? a. 310 plf b. 380 plf c. 460 plf d. 510 plf Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE 3-63

15 Part 4 Multiple Choice Solutions Problem Answer Reference / Solution 1.11 c p. 1-5, Earthquake intensity The intensity of an earthquake is based on the damage to structures, the ground surface, and observed effects on people and other features. I & III 1.12 d p. 1-7, Attenuation Attenuation is the decrease in seismic energy received at a site with increasing distance from the earthquake epicenter. Distance to the epicenter 1.13 c p. 1-8, Table 1.3 MMI VI 1.14 d p. 1-4, Earthquake Strength n = M5.0 M3.0 = 2 10 n = (10) 2 = b p. 1-5, Energy Release n = M6.8 M5.8 = 1 32 n = (32) 1 = c p. 1-7, Earthquake intensity Large magnitude and long duration is likely to cause the most damage M7.0 / 30 seconds 1.17 f p. 1-10, Natural Period T 2 W / K g function of weight (W) & stiffness (K) both b & d 1.18 c p. 1-12, Damping ratio = B / B critical actual damping coefficient to critical damping coefficient 1.19 d p. 1-12, T d is slightly greater than T & p. 1-14, Figure spectral acceleration (S a ) and therefore base shear (V) decreases with increasing damping ratio ( ). both a & c 1.20 a p. 1-12, Damping ratio typical ratios of = 2% (flexible steel frame) to 15% (light wood-frame) Plywood shear wall (i.e., light wood-frame) 1.21 c p. 1-10, Table 1.4 K 1 = 12EI/h 3 = 12(29,000 ksi)(200 in 4 ) / (14 ft) 3 (12 in/ft) 3 = kips/in (continued) 4-2 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

16 Part 4 Multiple Choice Solutions Problem Answer Reference / Solution 4.18 a p & ASCE 7-10 p. 56, SD T S 0.58 second S 1.12 DS 4.19 b p & ASCE 7-10 p. 72, x Ta Cthn ASCE 7 (12.8-7) Steel EBF ASCE 7-10 Table C t = 0.03 & x = 0.75 T a = 0.03 (110 ) 0.75 = 1.02 sec Or using Table C1 (p. 5-16) Steel EBF & h n = 110 T a = 1.02 sec T a = 1.02 second 4.20 a p & ASCE 7-10 p. 72, T a = 0.1 N ASCE 7 (12.8-8) Applicable for moment frames (concrete or steel) 12 stories maximum, and with average story height 10 feet DO NOT use Table C1 (p. 5-16) it only applies to ASCE 7 (12.8-7) T a = 0.1 (5 stories) = 0.50 second 4.21 c p & ASCE 7-10 p. 72, x Ta Cthn ASCE 7 (12.8-7) Steel SMF ASCE 7-10 Table C t = & x = 0.8 T a = (195 ) 0.8 = 1.90 sec Or using Table C1 (p. 5-16) Steel MRF & h n = 195 T a = 1.90 sec DO NOT use T a = 0.1 N since the number of stories (or levels) is not given, and it is not known if this steel MRF buidling is 12 stories and whether the average story height 10 feet T a = 1.90 second 4.22 d p & ASCE 7-10 p. 72, x Ta Cthn ASCE 7 (12.8-7) Dual systems (except D.1 - SMF combined w/ steel EBF) ASCE 7-10 Table C t = 0.02 & x = 0.75 T a = 0.02 (35 ) 0.75 = 0.29 sec Or using Table C1 (p. 5-16) Dual Systems & h n = 35 T a = 0.29 sec T a = 0.29 second 4.23 a p & ASCE 7-10 p. 71, Table T S = 3.5 (0.6) = 2.10 seconds SDC = D & T = 2.4 seconds > 3.5 T S Table ELF procedure is noted as NP (not permitted). All others allow use of the ELF procedure. 200 foot tall regular structure with T = 2.4 seconds 4.24 c ASCE 7-10 p. 60, Table , item B.2 - Steel SCBF R = Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

17 Part 4 Multiple Choice Solutions Problem Answer Reference / Solution Structure B By observation, ASCE 7 (12.8-3) will have to govern for Structure B for V A = V B since T B will have to be much larger than T A to counteract the increase in effective seismic weight between structure A to structure B (i.e., W B = 3 W A ). Therefore, assume ASCE 7 (12.8-3) governs for C S C S-B = S D1 / T B (R / I e ) ASCE 7 (12.8-3) V B = C S-B W B ASCE 7 (12.8-1) Set the base shears equal V A = V B C S-A W A = C S-B W B S DS W A / (R / I e ) = S D1 3W A / T B (R / I e ) W A / (R / I e ) cancel from both sides of the equation S DS = 3 S D1 / T B Solve for T B T B = 3 S D1 / S DS T B = 3 (0.30 ) / 0.73 = 1.23 seconds 1.25 seconds 4.85 b p. 1-63, Structural Separation & ASCE 7-10 p. 77, Cd max M ASCE 7 ( ) Ie Structure 1: C d = 5½ ASCE 7-10 p. 61, Table item C.1 for steel SMF At Level 4 - δ M1 = C d δ max / I e = (5½)(2.1 ) / (1.00) = At Level 7 (roof) - δ M1 = C d δ max / I e = (5½)(3.5 ) / (1.00) = Structure 2: C d = 4 ASCE 7-10 p. 60, Table item B.16 for special masonry SW At Level 4 (roof) - δ M2 = C d δ max / I e = (4)(1.4 ) / (1.00) = 5.60 NOTE: If Structure 1 and Structure 2 are to collide, that collision will occur at Level 4 for both structures, so that will be the level used to determine the required separation. Adjacent buildings on the same property, structural separation - MT 2 2 ASCE 7 ( ) M 1 M ( 11.55") (5.60") = inches 4.86 d p to 64, Structural Separation & ASCE 7-10 p. 77, From Problem Structure 1: At Level 7 (roof) - δ M1 = C d δ max / I e = (5½)(3.5 ) / (1.00) = Where a structure adjoins a property line (not common to a public way), the structure shall be set back from the property line by at least the displacement M of that structure. (continued) 4-24 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

18 Part 4 Multiple Choice Solutions Problem Answer Reference / Solution 9.15 a p , Chord Force Maximum chord force (CF) occurs at the point of largest moment and least diaphragm depth. This maximum moment occurs on lines A & B (East-West loading) at the center of the diaphragm span (i.e., maximum CF = w s L 2 /8d where L is maximum & d is minimum). a 9.16 c p , Wood Structural Panel Diaphragms V 1 = V 5 = w s L / 2 = (350 plf)(120 /2) = 21,000 lbs For ASD, roof 1 = 5 = (0.7 V 1 ) / d = 0.7 (21,000 lbs) / 40 = 370 plf 9.17 c p , Table 9.2 & SDPWS p. 18, Table 4.2A (blocked diaphragms) Load perpendicular to continuous panel joints = CASE 1 (strong direction) 15/32 Structural I w/ 6 o.c. blocked Table 9.2 (4.2A) s = 640 plf ASD = s / 2.0 = (640 plf) / 2.0 = 320 plf < 400 plf NG! 15/32 Structural I w/ 4 o.c. blocked Table 9.2 (4.2A) s = 850 plf ASD = s / 2.0 = (850 plf) / 2.0 = 425 plf > 400 plf OK STOP no need to check 2½ o.c. or 2 o.c. Diaphragm boundary nailing = 4 o.c c p , Drag Force Maximum drag force on line 5 occurs at the left end of the 20 shear wall (i.e., at y ) F 5 = (400 plf)(20 ) = 8,000 lbs = 8 kips 9.19 d p , Wood Structural Panel Shear Walls V 5 = w s L / 2 = (350 plf)(120 /2) = 21,000 lbs ( 0.7 Vmax ) 1.0(0.7)(21,000) For ASD, wall 5 b 20' = 740 plf 9.20 a p , Table 9.5 & SDPWS p. 31, Table 4.3A 15/32 Structural I w/ 10d 6 o.c. s = 680 plf ASD = s / 2.0 = (680 plf) / 2.0 = 340 plf << 850 plf NG! 15/32 Structural I w/ 10d 4 o.c. s = 1020 plf ASD = s / 2.0 = (1020 plf) / 2.0 = 510 plf << 850 plf NG! 15/32 Structural I w/ 10d 3 o.c. s = 1330 plf ASD = s / 2.0 = (1330 plf) / 2.0 = 665 plf << 850 plf NG! 15/32 Structural I w/ 10d 2 o.c. s = 1740 plf ASD = s / 2.0 = (1740 plf) / 2.0 = 870 plf > 850 plf OK shear wall edge nailing = 10d 2 o.c Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No. CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus

More information

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum

More information

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship 2004 Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Abi Aghayere Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/other

More information

Structural Calculations For:

Structural Calculations For: Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA 94551 D031014 Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical

More information

Figure 2.1 Risk Category vs. Ground Motion (Ref Figure C11.5-1) 1-22 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE

Figure 2.1 Risk Category vs. Ground Motion (Ref Figure C11.5-1) 1-22 Steven T. Hiner, MS, SE Chater 2 Organizations, Codes & Standards SDR Workbook 2012 IBC Version While PBSD has yet to be fully develoed, it is exected to be used in future building codes to rovide a methodology to more reliably

More information

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake

More information

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC. ICC ES Report ICC ES () 7 () www.icc es.org Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1 Reissued /1 This report is subject to renewal /. DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: 1 STEEL ING REPORT

More information

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE F-DEK ROOF (ASD) 1-1/2" high x 6" pitch x 36" wide SECTION PROPERTIES GAGE Wd 22 1.63 20 1.98 18 2.62 16 3.30 I D (DEFLECTION) 0.142 0.173 0.228 fy = 40 ksi Sp Sn 0.122 0.135 708 815 905 1211 1329 2365

More information

SEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code

SEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code /5/29 SEAoT State Conference 29 Austin, Texas Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? by Larry Griffis P.E. Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. Seminar Topics ASCE 7 Simplified Wind Provisions ASCE 7 Seismic

More information

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD Architecture 314 Structures I Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake Load Combinations ASD LRFD University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures I Slide 1 of 27

More information

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS U09Y0061A - GaragePlus - RV Storage R1 of 12 1050 North Watery Lane Ph: (435) 919-3100 Brigham City, UT 84302Fax: (435) 919-3101 Page R1 of Date: 3/24/09 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS FOR

More information

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil) QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================

More information

10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax

10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. ATTN: Chris Hanstad 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 27 March 2013 SUBJ: CRL SRS STANDOFF RAILING SYSTEM GLASS BALUSTRADE GUARDS The SRS Standoff Railing System is an engineered

More information

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK HELIODYNE RACK PROJECT: JOB NO: 2008-36 SHEET: DESIGNED BY: WCM DATE: CHECKED BY: SCOPE: KTD DATE: Racking Calculation Report 1 OF 1/22/2011 1/22/2011 17 Structural calculations for HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR

More information

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED Ministry of Municipal Affairs PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED CHANGE NUMBER: SOURCE: B-04-01-15 Ontario-NBC CODE REFERENCE: Division B / 4.1.8.2. Division B / 4.1.8.4.

More information

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS A Thesis in Architectural Engineering by Bradley S. Frederick

More information

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes

More information

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC 0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2657 Reissued 05/2017 This report is subject to renewal 03/2018. DIVISION: 05 00 00 METALS SECTION:

More information

Seismic design of bridges

Seismic design of bridges NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Seismic design of bridges Lecture 3 Ioannis N. Psycharis Capacity design Purpose To design structures of ductile behaviour

More information

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000

More information

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23

More information

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems 2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Structural Building Components Association (SBCA) August 10, 2018 SBCA is an APPROVED

More information

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E.

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E. Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure Gordon Wray, P.E. SEAONC Protective Systems Subcommittee Objectives > Current Unique Code Requirements More sophisticated engineering analysis Geotechnical need

More information

Dr. Mohammed E. Haque, P.E. Lecture Notes

Dr. Mohammed E. Haque, P.E. Lecture Notes nalysis of Selected Determinate Structural Systems Planar Trusses Method of Joints Planar Trusses Method of Sections Pinned Frames with Multi-force Members Retaining Walls OS321Haque 1 Planar Trusses Method

More information

Design of RC Retaining Walls

Design of RC Retaining Walls Lecture - 09 Design of RC Retaining Walls By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Retaining Walls Terms Related to Retaining Walls Types of Retaining

More information

Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls

Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls Advancements Click to edit in Force Master Transfer title stylearound Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Alese Ashuckian, PE, LEED AP Engineered

More information

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings Fawad A. Najam Pennung Warnitchai Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand Email: fawad.ahmed.najam@ait.ac.th A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 3 ANALYSIS METHODS OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BRIDGES 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Loadings for the Analysis

More information

SHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University

SHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University SHEET PILE WALLS Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University Lateral Support In geotechnical engineering, it is often necessary to prevent lateral soil movements. Tie rod Anchor Sheet pile Cantilever retaining

More information

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 1 st. Semester Examination 2004/2005 Academic Session October 2004 EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design Time : 3 hours Instruction to candidates: 1. Ensure that this paper contains

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

Chapter 9: Column Analysis and Design

Chapter 9: Column Analysis and Design Chapter 9: Column Analysis and Design Introduction Columns are usually considered as vertical structural elements, but they can be positioned in any orientation (e.g. diagonal and horizontal compression

More information

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2 PEER/SSC Tall Building Design Case study #2 Typical Plan View at Ground Floor and Below Typical Plan View at 2 nd Floor and Above Code Design Code Design Shear Wall properties Shear wall thickness and

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 07 3.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES LEARNING OUTCOMES Learning outcomes: At the end of this lecture/week the students would be able to: Understand

More information

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics Name: University of California, Berkeley Fall Semester, 2018 Problem 1 (30% weight) Preliminary Examination - Dynamics An undamped SDOF system with mass m and stiffness k is initially at rest and is then

More information

Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 5.1 GENERAL The equivalent lateral force (ELF) procedure specified in Sec. 5.2 is similar in its basic concept to SEAOC recommendations in 1968, 1973,

More information

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 2.5 x 6 Design Span (L):

More information

Problem 7.1 Determine the soil pressure distribution under the footing. Elevation. Plan. M 180 e 1.5 ft P 120. (a) B= L= 8 ft L e 1.5 ft 1.

Problem 7.1 Determine the soil pressure distribution under the footing. Elevation. Plan. M 180 e 1.5 ft P 120. (a) B= L= 8 ft L e 1.5 ft 1. Problem 7.1 Determine the soil pressure distribution under the footing. Elevation Plan M 180 e 1.5 ft P 10 (a) B= L= 8 ft L e 1.5 ft 1.33 ft 6 1 q q P 6 (P e) 180 6 (180) 4.9 kip/ft B L B L 8(8) 8 3 P

More information

New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16

New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16 New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16 Building EERI Seismic Seminar on Safety Next Generation Council Webinar Attenuation Models July 28, 2017 Charlie Kircher Kircher & Associates Palo Alto, California

More information

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth

More information

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,

More information

University of California at Berkeley Structural Engineering Mechanics & Materials Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Spring 2012 Student name : Doctoral Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

More information

Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase

Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase Level II: Section 04 Simplified Method (optional) Section Downloads Section Downloads Handouts & Slides can be printed Version.0 Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase

More information

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002 Abstract Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 00 Paresh V. Patel Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Nirma Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad 38481 In this article codal provisions of IS 1893

More information

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order: GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on

More information

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Two-way slabs have tension reinforcing spanning in BOTH directions, and may take the general form of one of the following: Types of Two-Way Slab Systems Lecture 7 Page 1 of 13 The

More information

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Kawai, N. 1 ABSTRACT Relating to the revision of Building Standard Law of Japan, the application

More information

Trusted SECTION: POST COLUMBIA, PANELS. Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. Copyright 2015

Trusted SECTION: POST COLUMBIA, PANELS. Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. Copyright 2015 0 ICC ES Report ICC ES (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.orgg 000 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1169 Reissued 06/2015 This report is subject to renewal 06/2016. DIVISION: 05 00 00 METALS

More information

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2 1) A two-story building frame is shown below. The mass of the frame is assumed to be lumped at the floor levels and the floor slabs are considered rigid. The floor masses and the story stiffnesses are

More information

2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350)

2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) 2018 WFCM Changes Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council Lori Koch, P.E. Manager,

More information

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity).

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity). HPTER 3 VIRTION THEORY Single egree of Freedom Systems (SOF).. 3- Stiffness, k. 3- Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity). 3-3 Natural Period.. 3-3 Natural Frequency... 3-5 ngular Natural Frequency 3-5 Structural

More information

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified

More information

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder

More information

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B Volume B 3.1.4 Diaphragmatic behaviour In general, when there is eccentric loading at a floor, e.g. imposed by the horizontal seismic action, the in-plane rigidity of the slab forces all the in-plane points

More information

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads Chapter Objectives Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads A Bridge Deck under Bending Action Castellated Beams Post-tensioned Concrete Beam Lateral Distortion of a Beam Due to Lateral Load

More information

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS AASTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN LANE ENTERPRISES, INC. www.lane-enterprises.com Required Backfill and Load Cases: ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS BASIS OF DESIGN Backfill

More information

Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST

Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 2 x 10 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear

More information

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Introduction As we stated in Chapter 3, foundations are considered to be shallow if if [D (3 4)B]. Shallow foundations have several advantages: minimum

More information

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Serviceability Deflection calculation Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning

More information

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318 Sway Column Example PCA Notes on ACI 318 ASDIP Concrete is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com Example 11.2 Slenderness Effects for Columns in a Sway Frame Design columns C1 and C2 in the

More information

An Investigation of the Fundamental Period of Vibration of Irregular Steel Structures THESIS

An Investigation of the Fundamental Period of Vibration of Irregular Steel Structures THESIS An Investigation of the Fundamental Period of Vibration of Irregular Steel Structures THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School

More information

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC ENERGY DIAGRAM ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS INELASTIC WORK DONE HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION DUCTILITY

More information

Special edition paper

Special edition paper Development of New Aseismatic Structure Using Escalators Kazunori Sasaki* Atsushi Hayashi* Hajime Yoshida** Toru Masuda* Aseismatic reinforcement work is often carried out in parallel with improvement

More information

1/29/2010 Page 2 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 3 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 4 of 65 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 5 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number 09-118 West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn

More information

AB Engineering Manual

AB Engineering Manual AB Engineering Manual Allan Block Retaining Walls FOREWORD This manual presents the techniques used by Allan Block in our engineering practice to design retaining walls. It is not intended as a textbook

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction

More information

Dr. Ceasar Hearne. Structural Calculations. Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah

Dr. Ceasar Hearne. Structural Calculations. Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah Dr. Ceasar Hearne Structural Calculations Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah This engineering report is valid only for the aforementioned building located at the address above. This report

More information

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF WOOD DIAPHRAGMS

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF WOOD DIAPHRAGMS FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF WOOD DIAPHRAGMS By Robert H. Falk 1 and Rafii Y. Itani, 2 Member, ASCE ABSTRACT: This report describes a two-dimensional finite element model for analyzing vertical and horizontal

More information

Beam Design - Pine Tree

Beam Design - Pine Tree - Pine Tree 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Southern Pine Grade: SP DSS Size: 2 x 8 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear Span: 11.67 ft. Total

More information

Beam Design - Trotin Project

Beam Design - Trotin Project Beam Design - Trotin Project 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 3.125 x 13.5 Design Span (L): 14.98

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 (80-266-19**) Unit: ZF180 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 115.25 in (Length of curb) wcurb = 84 in (Width of curb)

More information

Beam Design - Awning

Beam Design - Awning Beam Design - Awning 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 4 x 12 Design Span (L): 21.50 ft. Clear Span:

More information

Farquhar Park Aquatic Center. York, PA

Farquhar Park Aquatic Center. York, PA Jason Kukorlo Consultant: March 7, 2010 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary.5 II. III. IV. Acknowledgements..7 Building Design Summary...8 Existing Structural System Overview Foundation.10 Superstructure

More information

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY FLOODWALL DESIGN

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY FLOODWALL DESIGN HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY FLOODWALL DESIGN March 2014Revised March 2015 UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

More information

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 2-1. Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). 4-1.

More information

TECHNICAL CORRECTION July Process Industry Practices Structural. PIP STE03360 Heat Exchanger and Horizontal Vessel Foundation Design Guide

TECHNICAL CORRECTION July Process Industry Practices Structural. PIP STE03360 Heat Exchanger and Horizontal Vessel Foundation Design Guide TECHNICAL CORRECTION July 2007 Structural Heat Exchanger and Horizontal Vessel Foundation Design Guide PURPOSE AND USE OF PROCESS INDUSTRY PRACTICES In an effort to minimize the cost of process industry

More information

From Table 1 4. DL = [12 lb/ft 2 # in.(6 in.)] (15 ft)(10 ft) = 10,800 lb. LL = (250 lb/ft 2 )(15 ft)(10 ft) = 37,500 lb.

From Table 1 4. DL = [12 lb/ft 2 # in.(6 in.)] (15 ft)(10 ft) = 10,800 lb. LL = (250 lb/ft 2 )(15 ft)(10 ft) = 37,500 lb. 1 1. The floor of a heavy storage warehouse building is made of 6-in.-thick stone concrete. If the floor is a slab having a length of 15 ft and width of 10 ft, determine the resultant force caused by the

More information

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability

More information

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department

More information

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ). Architectural Railing Division C.R.Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 E Vernon Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90058 (T) 800.421.6144 (F) 800.587.7501 www.crlaurence.com 12 JAN 2011 SUBJ: TAPER-LOC SYSTEM DRY-GLAZE LAMINATED

More information

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).

More information

Liquefaction and Foundations

Liquefaction and Foundations Liquefaction and Foundations Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings 26 30 November, 2012 What is Liquefaction? Liquefaction

More information

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20 - Flat trusses require less overall depth than pitched trusses Spans: 40-200 Spacing: 10 to 40 on center - Residential

More information

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads 1 7 SEISMIC LOADS 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads 7.1.1 Seismic load and design earthquake motion (1) For ordinary buildings, seismic load is evaluated using the acceleration response spectrum (see Sec.7.2)

More information

Gravity dam and earthquake

Gravity dam and earthquake Gravity dam and earthquake Tardieu s Dynamic simplified method Patrick LIGNIER, Tractebel Engineering Coyne et Bellier Château des Comtes de Challes 9 octobre 2014 CONTENTS 2 Vulnerability of gravity dam

More information

DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members

DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood embers Welcome to the Lateral Torsional Stability ecourse. 1 Outline Lateral-Torsional Buckling Basic Concept Design ethod Examples In this ecourse,

More information

Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges BORRADOR. Calculations and Discussion

Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges BORRADOR. Calculations and Discussion Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges Check the capacity of a single anchor, 1 in. diameter, F1554 Grade 36 headed bolt with heavy-hex head installed in the top of a foundation without

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-91 (80-266-18**) Unit: YORK ZJ,ZR 180-300 / ZF 210-300 / XP 180-240 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 126.25 in (Length

More information

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics Fall Semester 2017 Problem 1 The simple structure shown below weighs 1,000 kips and has a period of 1.25 sec. It has no viscous damping. It is subjected to the impulsive load shown in the figure. If the

More information

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Introduction A beam is a long, slender structural member that resists loads that are generally applied transverse (perpendicular) to its longitudinal axis.

More information

Dynamic Analysis and Modeling of Wood-framed Shear Walls

Dynamic Analysis and Modeling of Wood-framed Shear Walls Dynamic Analysis and Modeling of Wood-framed Shear Walls Yasumura, M. 1 ABSTRACT Dynamic performance of wood-framed shear walls was analyzed by means of the non-linear earthquake response analysis and

More information

Seismic Loads Based on IBC 2015/ASCE 7-10

Seismic Loads Based on IBC 2015/ASCE 7-10 Seimic Load Baed on IBC 2015/ASCE 7-10 Baed on Section 1613.1 of IBC 2015, Every tructure, and portion thereof, including nontructural component that are permanently attached to tructure and their upport

More information

Allowable Design Stresses (psi)

Allowable Design Stresses (psi) 8 0 0. 2 2 1. 2 3 2 6 w w w. a n t h o n y f o r e s t. c o m 2 Allowable Design Stresses (psi) Power Beam Section Properties and Allowable Capacities 7.0 9.0 9.2 10.9 11.6 13.6 15.6 17.5 11.1 14.1 14.5

More information

Response Modification of Urban Infrastructure. 7 Chapter 7 Rocking Isolation of Foundations. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology

Response Modification of Urban Infrastructure. 7 Chapter 7 Rocking Isolation of Foundations. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology Response Modification of Urban Infrastructure 7 Chapter 7 Rocking Isolation of Foundations Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology Requirements of Foundations in Seismic Design Static Seismic

More information

Lecture 8: Flexibility Method. Example

Lecture 8: Flexibility Method. Example ecture 8: lexibility Method Example The plane frame shown at the left has fixed supports at A and C. The frame is acted upon by the vertical load P as shown. In the analysis account for both flexural and

More information

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29 1. Background In close collaboration with local partners, Earthquake Damage Analysis Center (EDAC) of Bauhaus Universität Weimar initiated a Turkish German joint research project on Seismic Risk Assessment

More information

AB Engineering Manual

AB Engineering Manual AB Engineering Manual Allan Block Retaining Walls This manual presents the techniques used by Allan Block in our engineering practice to design retaining walls. It is not intended as a textbook of soil

More information

QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING

QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING The QUAKE BRAKE TM Seismic Dampening Device. The QUAKE BRAKE TM was Certified NEBS Level 3 Zone Compliant after being tested in accordance

More information