Set-Valued Kurzweil Henstock Pettis Integral
|
|
- Marilynn Gibbs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Set-Vlued Anlysis (25) 13: Springer 25 Set-Vlued Kurzweil Henstock Pettis Integrl L. DI PIAZZA 1 nd K. MUSIAŁ 2 1 Deprtment of Mthemtics, University of Plermo, vi Archirfi 34, 9123 Plermo, Itly. e-mil: dipizz@mth.unip.it 2 Institute of Mthemtics, Wrocłw University, Pl. Grunwldzki 2/4, Wrocłw, Polnd. e-mil: musil@mth.uni.wroc.pl (Received: 17 Februry 23; in finl form: 11 November 23) Abstrct. It is shown tht the obvious generliztion of the Pettis integrl of multifunction obtined by replcing the Lebesgue integrbility of the support functions by the Kurzweil Henstock integrbility, produces n integrl which cn be described in cse of multifunctions with (wekly) compct convex vlues in terms of the Pettis set-vlued integrl. Mthemtics Subject Clssifictions (2): Primry: 28B2; secondry: 26A39, 28B5, 46G1, 54C6. Key words: multifunction, Pettis set-vlued integrl, Kurzweil Henstock integrl, Kurzweil Henstock Pettis integrl, support function, selection. 1. Introduction There is bundnt literture deling with Bochner nd Pettis integrtion of Bnch spce-vlued multifunctions (see El Amri nd Hess [5] for further references) of severl types. In prticulr, quite recently Zit [17, 18] nd El Amri nd Hess [5] presented nice chrcteriztion of Pettis integrble multifunctions hving s their vlues convex wekly compct subsets of Bnch spce. The definitions of such integrls involve in some wy the Lebesgue integrbility of the support functions. The theory of integrtion introduced by Lebesgue t the beginning of the twentieth century is powerful tool which, perhps becuse of its bstrct chrcter, does not hve the intuitive ppel of the Riemnn integrl. Besides, s Lebesgue himself observed in his thesis [15], his integrl does not integrte ll unbounded derivtives nd so it does not provide solution for the problem of primitives, i.e. for the problem of recovering function from its derivtive. Moreover the Lebesgue theory does not cover nonbsolutely convergent integrls. In 1957 Kurzweil [14] nd, independently, in 1963 Henstock [9], by simple modifiction of Riemnn s method, gve new definition of integrl, which is more generl thn tht of Lebesgue. The Kurzweil Henstock integrl retins the intuitive ppel of the Riemnn definition, nd, t the sme time, hs the power of Lebesgue s one. Moreover it integrtes ll derivtives. In the lst thirty yers the theory of nonbsolute integrls hs gone on considerbly nd the reserches in this
2 168 L. DI PIAZZA AND K. MUSIAŁ field re still ctive nd fr to be complete (for survey on the subject, we refer to [1]). This is the motivtion to consider, lso in cse of multifunctions, the Kurzweil Henstock integrl for rel vlued functions. In this pper, in prticulr, we study the obvious generliztion of the Pettis integrl of multifunction obtined by replcing the Lebesgue integrbility of the support functions by the Kurzweil Henstock integrbility (we cll such n integrl Kurzweil Henstock Pettis). In Theorem 1 we prove surprising nd unexpected chrcteriztion of the new integrl in terms of the Pettis integrl: the Kurzweil Henstock Pettis integrl is in some wy trnsltion of the Pettis integrl. In cse of mesurble multifunctions with convex wekly compct vlues, the Pettis integrbility of the selections is necessry nd sufficient condition for the Pettis integrbility of the multifunction. We show tht similr chrcteriztion holds true lso in cse of the Kurzweil Henstock Pettis integrbility of multifunctions. 2. Bsic Fcts Let [, 1] be the unit intervl of the rel line equipped with the usul topology nd the Lebesgue mesure. L denotes the fmily of ll Lebesgue mesurble subsets of [, 1] nd if E L, then E denotes its Lebesgue mesure. A prtition P in [,b] [, 1] is collection {(I 1,t 1 ),...,(I p,t p )}, wherei 1,...,I p re nonoverlpping subintervls of [,b] nd t i is point of I i, i = 1,...,p.If p i=1 I i =[,b], we sy tht P is prtition of [,b]. Aguge on [,b] is positive function on [,b]. For given guge δ on [,b], we sy tht prtition {(I 1,t 1 ),...,(I p,t p )} is δ-fine if I i (t i δ(x i ), t i + δ(x i )), i = 1,...,p. DEFINITION 1 ([3, 6]). Let X be ny Bnch spce. A function f : [, 1] X is sid to be Henstock integrble on [,b] [, 1] if there exists w X with the following property: for every ɛ>there exists guge δ on [,b] such tht p f(t i ) I i w <ε, i=1 for ech δ-fine prtition {(I 1,t 1 ),...,(I p,t p )} of [,b].wesetw =: (H ) b f dt. We denote the set of ll Henstock integrble functions on [, 1], tking their vlues in X,byH([, 1],X). In cse when X is the rel line, f is clled Kurzweil Henstock integrble, orsimplykh-integrble nd the spce of ll KH-integrble functions is denoted by KH[, 1]. It is useful to recll some bsic results in the theory of rel vlued KH-integrble functions. The proofs cn be found, for exmple, in [8]. PROPOSITION 1. Let f : [, 1] R be function.
3 SET-VALUED KURZWEIL HENSTOCK PETTIS INTEGRAL 169 () If f is Lebesgue integrble on [, 1], then it is lso KH-integrble. (b) If f is KH-integrble on [, 1],thenf is mesurble. (c) If f is KH-integrble on [, 1], thenf is KH-integrble on every subintervl of [, 1]. (d) f is Lebesgue integrble on [, 1] if nd only if both f nd f re KHintegrble. (e) If f = F is derivtive, then f is KH-integrble nd (KH) s f(t)dt = F(s) F(),forechs [, 1]. Throughout this pper X is seprble Bnch spce with dul X. The closed unit bll of X is denoted by B(X ). c(x) denotes the collection of ll nonempty closed convex subsets of X. cwk(x) (resp. cwk(x )) denotes the fmily of ll nonempty convex wekly compct subsets of X (resp. of the bidul X of X), ck(x) (resp. ck(x )) the fmily of ll nonempty convex compct subsets of X (resp. of X )ndcb(x) (resp. cb(x )) the fmily of ll nonempty closed bounded convex subsets of X (resp. of X ). For every C c(x) the support function of C is denoted by s(,c)nd defined on X by s(x,c) = sup{ x,x :x C}, for ech x X.IfC =, s(,c)is identiclly.otherwises(,c)does not tke the vlue. Any mp Γ : [, 1] c(x) is clled multifunction. A multifunction Γ is sid to be mesurble if for ech open subset O of X, the set {t [, 1] :Γ(t) O }is mesurble set. Γ is sid to be sclrly mesurble if for every x X,themps(x,Γ( )) is mesurble. It is known tht in cse of cwk(x)-vlued multifunctions the sclr mesurbility yields the mesurbility (cf. [1], Proposition 2.39). The reverse impliction lwys holds true (cf. [1], Proposition 2.3.2). Γ : [, 1] c(x) is sid to be grph mesurble if the set {(t, x) [, 1] X : x Γ(t)} is member of the product σ -lgebr generted by L nd the Borel subsets of X in the norm topology. In cse of considering of complete probbility spce nd Bnch spce the grph mesurbility of c(x)-vlued multifunction coincides with its mesurbility (cf. [1], Theorem ). Γ is sid to be sclrly integrble (resp. sclrly Kurzweil Henstock integrble) if, for every x X, the function s(x,γ( )) is integrble (resp. Kurzweil Henstock integrble). A function f : [, 1] X is clled selection of Γ if, for every t [, 1], one hs f(t) Γ(t). A selection f is sid to be mesurble if the function f is strongly mesurble (i.e. f is limit of n lmost everywhere convergent sequence of mesurble simple functions). DEFINITION 2. A mesurble multifunction Γ : [, 1] cb(x) is Dunford (respectively Kurzweil Henstock Dunford) integrble or simply D-integrble (resp. KHD-integrble), if it is sclrly integrble (resp. sclrly Kurzweil Henstock integrble) nd for ech nonempty set A L (resp. subintervl [,b] [, 1]), there exists nonempty set W A cb(x ) (resp. W [,b] cb(x )) such tht
4 17 L. DI PIAZZA AND K. MUSIAŁ s(x,w A ) = (L) ( resp. s(x,w [,b] ) = (KH) A s(x, Γ (t)) dt, (1) b ) s(x, Γ (t)) dt for ll x X (L stnds for the Lebesgue integrl). If W A C (resp. W [,b] C), for ech A L (resp. [,b] [, 1]), nd C is subspce of cb(x), thenγ is sid to be Pettis integrble, or simply P -integrble (resp. Kurzweil Henstock Pettis integrble or simply KHP-integrble)inC. We cll W A (resp. W [,b] )thepettis (resp. Kurzweil Henstock Pettis) integrl of Γ over A (resp. [,b])ndwesetw A =: (P ) A Γ(t)dt (resp. W [,b] =: (KHP) b Γ(t)dt). We note tht when multifunction is function f : [, 1] X, then the sets W A nd W [,b] re reduced to vectors in X, the equlities (1) nd (2) turn into x,w A =(L) x f(t)dt, ( resp. x,w [,b] =(KH) A b ) x f(t)dt nd we sy in tht cse tht the function f is Pettis (resp. Kurzweil Henstock Pettis) integrble. It is perhps worth to recll in this plce tht Gmez nd Mendoz [7] proved tht function f : [, 1] X is KHD-integrble if nd only if f is sclrly KH-integrble. An extensive study of Bnch vlued Pettis integrl cn be found in [16]. Given multifunction Γ : [, 1] cb(x) by the symbols S KHP (Γ ) nd S P (Γ ) we denote the fmilies of ll mesurble selections of Γ tht re respectively Kurzweil Henstock Pettis integrble nd Pettis-integrble. It is consequence of [13] tht if X is seprble, then for ech mesurble multifunction Γ : [, 1] cb(x) the fmily of mesurble selections of Γ is not empty. DEFINITION 3. A mesurble multifunction Γ : [, 1] cwk(x) is sid to be Aumnn Kurzweil Henstock Pettis integrble if S KHP (Γ ). Then we define 1 { 1 } (AKHP) Γ(t)dt := (KHP) f(t)dt : f S KHP (Γ ). It is cler tht ech Henstock integrble function is lso KHP-integrble. The reverse impliction is not so obvious. In [7] there is n exmple of KHP-integrble function f : [, 1] c (the uthors sy there on the Denjoy Pettis integrl) which is not Pettis integrble. We re going to show tht sme function is not Henstock integrble. It will follow from this tht the collection of KHP-integrble functions is lrger thn tht of Henstock integrble ones. (2)
5 SET-VALUED KURZWEIL HENSTOCK PETTIS INTEGRAL 171 EXAMPLE 1. Consider sequence of intervls A n =[ n,b n ] [, 1] such tht 1 =, b n < n+1 for ll n N nd lim n b n = 1 nd define f : [, 1] c by ( 1 f(t)= 2 A 2n 1 χ A 2n 1 (t) 1 ) 2 A 2n χ A 2n (t). n=1 The function f is Dunford integrble, (D) [,1] f = nd(d) J f belongs to c for ech subintervl J [, 1] (see [7]). Consequently, f is KHP-integrble in [, 1] nd (KHP) [,1] f =. Let us consider now ny guge δ on [, 1].SetI =[c, 1],wherec>1 δ(1) nd b 2n 1 <c< 2n, for suitble nturl number n. Then, for i = 1,..., 2n 1, let P i ={(Is i,yi s ) : s = 1,...,p i} be δ-fine prtition of [ i,b i ] nd let Pˆ i = {(Js i,zi s ) : s = 1,...,q i} be δ-fine prtition of [b i, i+1 ],fori = 1,...,2n 2, nd of [b 2n 1,c] for i = 2n 1. Moreover ssume tht if zs i = b i or, respectively, zs i = i+1for some indices i nd s then the corresponding intervl Js i stisfies the dditionl condition Js i < 1 4(2n 1) A i or, respectively, Js i < 1 4(2n 1) A i+1. By the construction the fmily P ={(I, 1)} ( i P i) ( ˆ i P i )} is δ-fine prtition of [, 1].Wehve f(t) I (I,t) P = f(1) I + + i=1 1 2 {i:z i s = i+1} 2n 1 p i s=1 {i:z i s =b i} 2n 1 i=1 p i s=1 f(zs i ) J s i f(ys i ) I s i Js i 2 A i f(y i s ) I i s + {i:z i s =b i} {i:z i s = i+1} {i:z i s =b i} f(z i s ) J i s + f(zs i ) J s i J i s 2 A i+1 {i:z i s = i+1} f(z i s ) J i s 1 2 (2n 1 1) 8(2n 1) (2n 1 1) 8(2n 1) = 1 4. So tking into ccount tht (D) [,1] f =, the inequlities show tht f cnnot be H -integrble. It seems to be good plce to put here remrk concerning the problem of primitives for Bnch spce vlued functions. PROPOSITION 2. If f : [, 1] X is wekly differentible, then its wek derivtive f is KHP-integrble nd (KHP) s f (t) dt = f(s) f() for ech s [, 1].
6 172 L. DI PIAZZA AND K. MUSIAŁ Proof. The existence of the wek derivtive t point t mens tht there is point f (t) X such tht x f(t + t) x f(t) lim = x f (t) t t for ech x X. This in prticulr mens tht ech x f is differentible nd so by (e) of Proposition 1, x f(s) x f() = (KH) s (x f) (t) dt for every s [, 1]. But by the ssumption, we hve (x f) = x f wht yields x f(s) x f() = (KH) s x f (t) dt nd mens exctly tht f(s) f() = (KHP) s f (t) dt. In the bove proof one my ssume the wek continuity of f everywhere nd the wek differentibility of f nerly everywhere, i.e. except for countble set (cf. [8]). 3. A Chrcteriztion of KHP-Integrble Multifunctions We begin with n esy fct (it is true in more generl cse of c(x) insted of cb(x), but we do not wnt to enter into detils concerning the definition of the Pettis integrl in such cse, see [5]). LEMMA 1. Let G: [, 1] cb(x) be Pettis integrble in cb(x). If the null function is selection of G, then for every mesurble sets A nd B such tht A B we hve W A W B. Proof. Suppose tht x W A \ W B. Then, due to the Hhn Bnch theorem, there is x such tht x (x )>sup x WB x (x). Consequently, (L) s(x, G(t)) dt = s(x,w A) x (x )> sup x (x) A x W B = s(x,w B) = (L) s(x, G(t)) dt B wht contrdicts the nonnegtivity of the support functions of G. Thus W A W B. LEMMA 2. If Γ : [, 1] cwk(x) is KHP-integrble, then ech mesurble selection of Γ is KHP-integrble. Proof. If f is mesurble selection of Γ, then for ech x X nd t [, 1] we hve the inequlity s( x, Γ (t)) x f(t) s(x, Γ (t)). (3)
7 SET-VALUED KURZWEIL HENSTOCK PETTIS INTEGRAL 173 So, if f is mesurble, then the Kurzweil Henstock integrbility of the function x f follows immeditely by the Kurzweil Henstock integrbility of s(x, Γ (t)), for ech x X. Indeed, we get from (3) the inequlities, x f(t)+ s( x, Γ (t)) s(x, Γ (t)) + s( x, Γ (t)). The function s(x,γ( )) + s( x,γ( )) is nonnegtive nd KH-integrble, hence it is Lebesgue integrble (see (d) of Proposition 1). Consequently lso x f( ) + s( x,γ( )) is Lebesgue integrble. Finlly x f(t)=[x f(t)+ s( x, Γ (t))] s( x, Γ (t)) nd so x f KH[, 1]. Hence for ech [,b] [, 1] we hve s( x,w [,b] ) (KH) b x f(t)dt s(x,w [,b] ). Since W [,b] is convex wekly compct, the function x s(x,w [,b] ) is τ(x,x)-continuous, where τ(x,x)is the Mckey topology of X. Consequently the functionl x (KH) b x f(t)dt is lso τ(x,x)-continuous. It follows tht there is x [,b] X such tht (KH) b x f(t)dt = x,x [,b]. LEMMA 3. If ll mesurble selections of mesurble multifunction Γ : [, 1] cwk(x) re KHP-integrble, then for every x X nd every [,b] [, 1], we hve s ( x,(akhp) b ) Γ(t)dt = (KH) b s(x, Γ (t)) dt. Proof. It is enough to prove the ssertion for the unit intervl. If f S KHP (Γ ), then x f(t) s(x, Γ (t)) nd so we get immeditely the inequlity ( 1 ) 1 s x,(akhp) Γ(t)dt (KH) s(x, Γ (t)) dt. To prove the reverse inequlity let us fix x nd ε>. Then set Γ ε (t) := Γ(t) {x X : x (x) s(x, Γ (t)) ε}. One cn esily see tht Γ ε is grph mesurble nd so it is mesurble (cf. [1], Theorem2.1.35).Iff is mesurble selection of Γ ε, then clerly x f(t) s(x, Γ (t)) ε nd further (KH) 1 x f(t)dt (KH ) 1 This completes the proof. s(x, Γ (t)) dt ε.
8 174 L. DI PIAZZA AND K. MUSIAŁ LEMMA 4. If ll mesurble selections of sclrly KH-integrble multifunction Γ : [, 1] cwk(x) re KHP-integrble, then (AKHP) 1 Γ(t)dt is convex wekly compct set. Proof. Notice first tht the sclr KH-integrbility of Γ yields the sclr mesurbility of Γ nd hence its mesurbility (becuse we consider cwk(x)-vlued multifunctions). Let us fix mesurble selection f of Γ nd let G(t) := Γ(t) f(t).bythe ssumption f is KHP-integrble nd so G is lso AKHP-integrble. Let I [,1] := (AKHP) 1 G(t) dt nd let D be countble wek -dense subset of B(X ).Itis enough to prove the convexity nd wek compctness of I [,1]. As the convexity is obvious we will try to prove the wek compctness of I [,1]. To do it tke sequence of points x n I [,1]. Then there exist g n S KHP (G) with x n = (KHP) 1 g n (t) dt. We hve for ech n N, ech t [, 1] nd ech x the inequlities s( x, G(t)) x g n (t) s(x, G(t)) (4) nd the support functions s(x, G(t)) re Lebesgue integrble (becuse they re nonnegtive nd KH-integrble). Consequently lso ech x g n is Lebesgue integrble nd (L) 1 x g n (t) dt (L) 1 s(x, G(t)) dt + (L) 1 s( x, G(t)) dt. Due to the countbility of D nd L 1 -boundedness of ech sequence x g n we cn pply Bukhvlov Loznovskij s theorem [2] to find h n conv{g n,g n+1,...} such tht for ech x D the sequence x h n is.e. convergent to mesurble function h x. (We could pply lso Komlos theorem [11] insted, but the proof of the result of Bukhvlov Loznovskij is much more elementry.) As for ech t nd n we hve h n (t) G(t) nd G(t) is wekly compct there is wek cluster point h(t) G(t) of h n (t). It follows tht there is set N of Lebesgue mesure zero such tht for ech x D nd ech t/ N we hve x h(t) = lim n x h n (t) = h x (t). But s D seprtes points of X nd h n (t) is wekly reltively compct it follows tht for ech t / N the sequence h n (t) is wekly convergent to h(t). The wek mesurbility of h is immedite nd s X is seprble the Pettis theorem yields its strong mesurbility. Moreover, s consequence of the KHP integrbility of ll mesurble selections of Γ nd of the KHP-integrbility of f,we hve h S KHP (G).
9 SET-VALUED KURZWEIL HENSTOCK PETTIS INTEGRAL 175 Tking into ccount (4) nd the Lebesgue dominted convergence theorem we get for ech x X the reltion 1 1 lim x,(khp) h n (t) dt = lim(l) x h n (t) dt n n 1 = (L) x h(t) dt 1 = x,(khp) h(t) dt. (5) Put now y n = (KHP) 1 h n(t) dt.theny n I [,1], y n conv{x n,x n+1,...} nd the sequence y n is wekly convergent to x = (KHP) 1 h(t) dt. Thus, given n rbitrry sequence of elements x n I [,1] there is convex combintion of points y n conv{x n,x n+1,...} nd x I [,1] such tht y n x wekly. Consequently, the set I [,1] is wekly compct (cf. [12], 24). THEOREM 1. Let Γ : [, 1] cwk(x) be sclrly Kurzweil Henstock integrble multifunction. Then the following conditions re equivlent: (i) Γ is KHP-integrble in cwk(x); (ii) S KHP (Γ ) nd for every f S KHP (Γ ) there exists multifunction G: [, 1] cwk(x) such tht Γ(t)= G(t) + f(t)nd G is Pettis integrble in cwk(x); (iii) there exists f S KHP (Γ ) nd multifunction G: [, 1] cwk(x) such tht Γ(t)= G(t) + f(t)nd G is Pettis integrble in cwk(x); (iv) S KHP (Γ ) nd for every f, h S KHP (Γ ), h f is Pettis integrble; (v) for ll [,b] [, 1], (AKHP) b Γ(t)dt belongs to cwk(x) nd ( b ) b s x,(akhp) Γ(t)dt = (KH) s(x, Γ (t)) dt for ll x X ; (vi) ech mesurble selection of Γ is KHP-integrble. Proof. (i) (ii) Let f S KHP (Γ ) be quite rbitrry (existing by Lemm 2). Define G: [, 1] cwk(x) by setting G(t) := Γ(t) f(t).thens(x, G(t)) for ll x nd t [, 1]. Moreover, s(x, Γ (t)) = s(x, G(t)) + x f(t), (6) nd so KH-integrbility of s(x,γ( )) nd of x f yields the Lebesgue integrbility of s(x,g( )). Thus, we hve for ech x X (L) 1 s(x, G(t)) dt = (KH) 1 s(x, Γ (t)) dt (KH) 1 x f(t)dt
10 176 L. DI PIAZZA AND K. MUSIAŁ 1 = s(x,w [,1] ) (KH) ( = s x,w [,1] (KHP) 1 x f(t)dt ) f(t)dt. And since W [,1] belongs to cwk(x),lsothesetw [,1] (KHP) 1 f(t)dt belongs to cwk(x). Since the zero function is Pettis integrble selection of G nd s(x,g( )) is Lebesgue integrble, it follows from Theorem 3.7 of [5] tht for every E L there is closed convex set C E X such tht (L) s(x, G(t)) dt = s(x,c E ). E But s the set W [,1] (KHP) 1 f(t)dt is wekly compct, we my pply Lemm 1 to get Pettis integrbility of G in cwk(x). (ii) (iv) Let f S KHP (Γ ) nd set G(t) := Γ(t) f(t).nowifh is mesurble selection of Γ then g = h f is mesurble selection of G nd we hve the inequlity s( x, G(t)) x g(t) s(x, G(t)). (7) Hence, for ech E L there is W E cwk(x) such tht s( x,w E ) = (L) s( x, G(t)) dt E (L) x g(t) dt E (L) s(x, G(t)) dt = s(x,w E ). E Since W E is wekly compct its support function is τ(x,x)-continuous. It follows tht x (L) E x g(t) dt is τ(x,x)-continuous. This implies the Pettis integrbility of g. (iv) (ii) Tke n f S KHP (Γ ). Then, by the ssumption, ech mesurble selection g of G = Γ f is Pettis integrble nd so, by Theorem 5.4 of [5], G is Pettis integrble in cwk(x). (ii) (v) Let f S KHP (Γ ) be such tht the multifunction G(t) = Γ(t) f(t) is Pettis integrble in cwk(x). According to Theorem 5.4 of [5] we hve (P ) 1 G(t) dt ={(P ) 1 f(t)dt : f S P (G)}. Since(P ) 1 G(t) dt is convex wekly compct set nd (AKHP) 1 Γ(t)dt = (P ) 1 G(t) dt + (KHP) 1 lso the set (AKHP) 1 Γ(t)dt is convex wekly compct. f(t)dt,
11 SET-VALUED KURZWEIL HENSTOCK PETTIS INTEGRAL 177 Now we prove the second prt of the ssertion. Its proof is similr to the proof of Lemm 3. We tke [,b] =[, 1] for simplicity nd fix x X.Sinces(x, Γ (t)) = s(x, G(t)) + x f(t), by the hypotheses the support function s(x,γ( )) is KH-integrble. Then, tking into ccount tht s(x, G(t)) (KH) 1 x f dt (KH) 1 s(x, Γ (t)) dt for ech f S KHP (Γ ). Hence, ( 1 ) s x,(akhp) Γ(t)dt (KH) 1 s(x, Γ (t)) dt. Tke now n rbitrry ε> nd define new multifunction H : [, 1] cwk(x) by setting for ech t [, 1] H(t) := Γ(t) {x X : x (x) s(x, Γ (t)) ε}. If h is mesurble selection of H, s(x, Γ (t)) ε x h(t) s(x, Γ (t)) nd so (KH) 1 x h dt (KH) 1 s(x, Γ (t)) dt ε. Since h is lso selection of Γ, the ssertion follows. (v) (i), (ii) (iii) nd (iii) (i) re obvious. By Lemm 1 (i) implies (vi) nd (vi) (i) follows from Lemmt 3 nd 4. This completes the proof. Remrk 1. Theorem 1 remins true if cwk(x) is replced by ck(x). The proof requires only obvious chnges. COROLLARY 1. If Γ, G nd f re s in Theorem 1, then the (KHP)-integrl of Γ is trnsltion of the Pettis integrl of G: (KHP) b for ll [,b] [, 1]. Γ(t)dt = (P ) b G(t) dt + (KHP) b f(t)dt Anlysis of the proof of Theorem 1 gives lso the following result: THEOREM 2. Let Γ : [, 1] cb(x) be mesurble nd sclrly KH-integrble multifunction. If S KHP (Γ ), then the following conditions re equivlent: (j) Γ is KHP-integrble in cb(x);
12 178 L. DI PIAZZA AND K. MUSIAŁ (jj) for every f S KHP (Γ ) the multifunction G: [, 1] cb(x), given by G(t) = Γ(t) f(t), is Pettis integrble in cb(x); (jjj) there exists f S KHP (Γ ) such tht the multifunction G: [, 1] cb(x), given by G(t) = Γ(t) f(t), is Pettis integrble in cb(x). We hve then (KHP) b for ll [,b] [, 1]. Γ(t)dt = (P ) b G(t) dt + (KHP) b f(t)dt Without the ssumption S KHP (Γ ) we get only the following: THEOREM 3. Let Γ : [, 1] cb(x) be mesurble nd sclrly KH-integrble multifunction. If Γ is KHP-integrble in cb(x), then for every mesurble selection f of Γ the multifunction G: [, 1] cb(x) given by G(t) = Γ(t) f(t) is Pettis integrble in cb(x). We hve then (KH) b s(x, Γ (t)) dt = (L) b s(x, G(t)) dt + (KH) b x f(t)dt for ll [,b] [, 1] nd ll x X. Proof. Let f be mesurble selection of Γ nd let G be defined in the wy described bove. As mesurble selection of sclrly KH-integrble multifunction is sclrly KH-integrble, we see tht Γ(t)= G(t)+f(t), wheref is sclrly KHintegrble. Since G hs t lest one Bochner integrble selection (the null function), ccording to Corollry 3.8 of [5], for every E L there is D E c(x) with s(x,d E ) = (L) s(x, G(t)) dt E for ll x X. Hence, we hve for every x X s(x,d [,1] ) + (KH) 1 x f(t)dt = (KH) 1 s(x, Γ (t)) dt ±. It follows tht s(x,d [,1] ) ± for ll x X. The Bnch Steinhus theorem yields now D [,1] cb(x). And so pplying Lemm 1 we get tht lso every D E is bounded, proving the Pettis integrbility of G in cb(x). The Theorems 1 nd 2 show tht under suitble ssumptions mesurble nd sclrly (KH)-integrble multifunction is sum of Pettis integrble multifunction nd selection. In cse of cwk(x)-vlued multifunction ll selections of the Pettis integrble component re Pettis integrble. We finish with n exmple showing tht decomposition theorem for Pettis integrble in cwk(x) multifunction G in the form G(t) = H(t) + f(t),where f S P (G) nd ll mesurble selections of H re Bochner integrble, is in generl flse. In prticulr H cnnot be tken integrbly bounded.
13 SET-VALUED KURZWEIL HENSTOCK PETTIS INTEGRAL 179 EXAMPLE 2. Let f : [, 1] X be Pettis but not Bochner integrble function (it is well known tht if X is infinite-dimensionl, then there re such functions). We define multifunction G: [, 1] ck(x) by setting G(t) = conv{,f(t)}. Since for every x X we hve s(x, G(t)) =[x f(t)] +, the multifunction G is sclrly integrble nd mesurble. Moreover ll mesurble selections of G re Pettis integrble nd so G itself is Pettis integrble in ck(x) (see [5]). Suppose there is h S P (G) which is not Bochner integrble nd H(t) := G(t) h(t) is such tht ll its mesurble selections re Bochner integrble. We hve H(t) = conv{,f(t)} h(t) = conv{ h(t), f (t) h(t)}. But the function h is non- Bochner integrble selection of H. References 1. Bongiorno, B.: The Henstock Kurzweil integrl, In: Hndbook of Mesure Theory, Vols. I, II, North-Hollnd, Amsterdm, 22, pp Bukhvlov, A. nd Loznovskij, G. J.: On sets closed in mesure in spces of mesurble functions, Trudy Moskov. Mt. Obshch. 34 (1977), (in Russin). 3. Co, S. S.: The Henstock integrl for Bnch-vlued functions, SEA Bull. Mth. 16 (1992), Diestel, J. nd Uhl, J. J.: Vector Mesures, Mth. Surveys 15, El Amri, K. nd Hess, C.: On the Pettis integrl of closed vlued multifunctions, Set-Vlued Anl. 8 (2), Fremlin, D. H.: The Henstock nd McShne integrls of vector-vlued functions, Illinois J. Mth. 38 (1994), Gmez, J. L. nd Mendoz, J.: On Denjoy Dunford nd Denjoy Pettis integrls, Studi Mth. 13 (1998), Gordon, R. A.: The Integrls of Lebesgue, Denjoy, Perron, nd Henstock, Grd. Stud. Mth. 4, Amer. Mth. Soc., Henstock, R.: Theory of Integrtion, Butterworths, London, Hu, S. nd Ppgeorgiou, N. S.: Hndbook of Multivlued Anlysis. Vol. I: Theory, Kluwer Acdemic Publishers, Komlos, J.: A generliztion of problem of Steinhus, Act Mth. Acd. Sc. Hungrice 18 (1967), Köthe, G.: Topologicl Vector Spces I, Springer-Verlg, Kurtowski, K. nd Ryll-Nrdzewski, C.: A generl theorem on selections, Bull. Acd. Polon. Sci. Sèr. Sci. Mth. Astronom. Phys. 13 (1965), Kurzweil, J.: Generlized ordinry differentil equtions nd continuous dependence on prmeter, Czechoslovk Mth. J. 7 (1957), Lebesgue, H., Integrl, longueur, mire, Annli Mt. Pur Applic. 7 (192), Musił, K.: Topics in the theory of Pettis integrtion, Rend. Istit. Mt. Univ. Trieste 23 (1991), Zit, H.: Convergence theorems for Pettis integrble multifunctions, Bull. Polish Acd. Sci. Mth. 45 (1997), Zit, H.: On chrcteriztion of Pettis integrble multifunctions, Bull. Polish Acd. Sci. Mth. 48 (2),
The Bochner Integral and the Weak Property (N)
Int. Journl of Mth. Anlysis, Vol. 8, 2014, no. 19, 901-906 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikri.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ijm.2014.4367 The Bochner Integrl nd the Wek Property (N) Besnik Bush Memetj University
More informationON THE C-INTEGRAL BENEDETTO BONGIORNO
ON THE C-INTEGRAL BENEDETTO BONGIORNO Let F : [, b] R be differentible function nd let f be its derivtive. The problem of recovering F from f is clled problem of primitives. In 1912, the problem of primitives
More informationA PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS USING HAUSDORFF MEASURES
INROADS Rel Anlysis Exchnge Vol. 26(1), 2000/2001, pp. 381 390 Constntin Volintiru, Deprtment of Mthemtics, University of Buchrest, Buchrest, Romni. e-mil: cosv@mt.cs.unibuc.ro A PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL
More informationThe Regulated and Riemann Integrals
Chpter 1 The Regulted nd Riemnn Integrls 1.1 Introduction We will consider severl different pproches to defining the definite integrl f(x) dx of function f(x). These definitions will ll ssign the sme vlue
More informationA product convergence theorem for Henstock Kurzweil integrals
A product convergence theorem for Henstock Kurzweil integrls Prsr Mohnty Erik Tlvil 1 Deprtment of Mthemticl nd Sttisticl Sciences University of Albert Edmonton AB Cnd T6G 2G1 pmohnty@mth.ulbert.c etlvil@mth.ulbert.c
More informationCzechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction
Czechoslovk Mthemticl Journl, 55 (130) (2005), 933 940 ESTIMATES OF THE REMAINDER IN TAYLOR S THEOREM USING THE HENSTOCK-KURZWEIL INTEGRAL, Abbotsford (Received Jnury 22, 2003) Abstrct. When rel-vlued
More informationW. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying
Vitli covers 1 Definition. A Vitli cover of set E R is set V of closed intervls with positive length so tht, for every δ > 0 nd every x E, there is some I V with λ(i ) < δ nd x I. 2 Lemm (Vitli covering)
More informationA Convergence Theorem for the Improper Riemann Integral of Banach Space-valued Functions
Interntionl Journl of Mthemticl Anlysis Vol. 8, 2014, no. 50, 2451-2460 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikri.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ijm.2014.49294 A Convergence Theorem for the Improper Riemnn Integrl of Bnch
More informationReview of Riemann Integral
1 Review of Riemnn Integrl In this chpter we review the definition of Riemnn integrl of bounded function f : [, b] R, nd point out its limittions so s to be convinced of the necessity of more generl integrl.
More informationAdvanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004
Advnced Clculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrls nd Integrbility Professor Dvid Levermore 17 October 2004 1. Definite Integrls In this section we revisit the definite integrl tht you were introduced to when
More informationf(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all
3 Definite Integrl 3.1 Introduction In school one comes cross the definition of the integrl of rel vlued function defined on closed nd bounded intervl [, b] between the limits nd b, i.e., f(x)dx s the
More informationProblem Set 4: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016
Problem Set 4: s Mth 20A: Fll 206 Problem. Let f : X Y be one-to-one, onto mp between metric spces X, Y. () If f is continuous nd X is compct, prove tht f is homeomorphism. Does this result remin true
More informationOn the Continuous Dependence of Solutions of Boundary Value Problems for Delay Differential Equations
Journl of Computtions & Modelling, vol.3, no.4, 2013, 1-10 ISSN: 1792-7625 (print), 1792-8850 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2013 On the Continuous Dependence of Solutions of Boundry Vlue Problems for Dely Differentil
More informationFundamental Theorem of Calculus for Lebesgue Integration
Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus for Lebesgue Integrtion J. J. Kolih The existing proofs of the Fundmentl theorem of clculus for Lebesgue integrtion typiclly rely either on the Vitli Crthéodory theorem on
More informationRegulated functions and the regulated integral
Regulted functions nd the regulted integrl Jordn Bell jordn.bell@gmil.com Deprtment of Mthemtics University of Toronto April 3 2014 1 Regulted functions nd step functions Let = [ b] nd let X be normed
More informationSOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL (1 + µ(f n )) f(x) =. But we don t need the exact bound.) Set
SOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 28 Nottion: N {, 2, 3,...}. (Tht is, N.. Let (X, M be mesurble spce with σ-finite positive mesure µ. Prove tht there is finite positive mesure ν on (X, M such
More informationThe Henstock-Kurzweil integral
fculteit Wiskunde en Ntuurwetenschppen The Henstock-Kurzweil integrl Bchelorthesis Mthemtics June 2014 Student: E. vn Dijk First supervisor: Dr. A.E. Sterk Second supervisor: Prof. dr. A. vn der Schft
More informationA HELLY THEOREM FOR FUNCTIONS WITH VALUES IN METRIC SPACES. 1. Introduction
Ttr Mt. Mth. Publ. 44 (29), 159 168 DOI: 1.2478/v1127-9-56-z t m Mthemticl Publictions A HELLY THEOREM FOR FUNCTIONS WITH VALUES IN METRIC SPACES Miloslv Duchoň Peter Mličký ABSTRACT. We present Helly
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.ho] 16 Dec 2003
rxiv:mth/0312293v2 [mth.ho] 16 Dec 2003 Clssicl Lebesgue Integrtion Theorems for the Riemnn Integrl Josh Isrlowitz 244 Ridge Rd. Rutherford, NJ 07070 jbi2@njit.edu Februry 1, 2008 Abstrct In this pper,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ca] 7 Mar 2012
rxiv:1203.1462v1 [mth.ca] 7 Mr 2012 A simple proof of the Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus for the Lebesgue integrl Mrch, 2012 Rodrigo López Pouso Deprtmento de Análise Mtemátic Fcultde de Mtemátics, Universidde
More informationLecture 1. Functional series. Pointwise and uniform convergence.
1 Introduction. Lecture 1. Functionl series. Pointwise nd uniform convergence. In this course we study mongst other things Fourier series. The Fourier series for periodic function f(x) with period 2π is
More informationMAA 4212 Improper Integrals
Notes by Dvid Groisser, Copyright c 1995; revised 2002, 2009, 2014 MAA 4212 Improper Integrls The Riemnn integrl, while perfectly well-defined, is too restrictive for mny purposes; there re functions which
More informationFor a continuous function f : [a; b]! R we wish to define the Riemann integral
Supplementry Notes for MM509 Topology II 2. The Riemnn Integrl Andrew Swnn For continuous function f : [; b]! R we wish to define the Riemnn integrl R b f (x) dx nd estblish some of its properties. This
More informationMapping the delta function and other Radon measures
Mpping the delt function nd other Rdon mesures Notes for Mth583A, Fll 2008 November 25, 2008 Rdon mesures Consider continuous function f on the rel line with sclr vlues. It is sid to hve bounded support
More informationThe Banach algebra of functions of bounded variation and the pointwise Helly selection theorem
The Bnch lgebr of functions of bounded vrition nd the pointwise Helly selection theorem Jordn Bell jordn.bell@gmil.com Deprtment of Mthemtics, University of Toronto Jnury, 015 1 BV [, b] Let < b. For f
More informationAdvanced Calculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor David Levermore 11 December 2015
Advnced Clculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor Dvid Levermore 11 December 2015 12. Sequences of Functions We now explore two notions of wht it mens for sequence of functions {f n
More informationRiemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)
Riemnn is the Mnn! (But Lebesgue my besgue to differ.) Leo Livshits My 2, 2008 1 For finite intervls in R We hve seen in clss tht every continuous function f : [, b] R hs the property tht for every ɛ >
More information2 Fundamentals of Functional Analysis
Fchgruppe Angewndte Anlysis und Numerik Dr. Mrtin Gutting 22. October 2015 2 Fundmentls of Functionl Anlysis This short introduction to the bsics of functionl nlysis shll give n overview of the results
More information2 Definitions and Basic Properties of Extended Riemann Stieltjes Integrals
2 Definitions nd Bsic Properties of Extended Riemnn Stieltjes Integrls 2.1 Regulted nd Intervl Functions Regulted functions Let X be Bnch spce, nd let J be nonempty intervl in R, which my be bounded or
More informationRiemann Sums and Riemann Integrals
Riemnn Sums nd Riemnn Integrls Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologicl Sciences nd Deprtment of Mthemticl Sciences Clemson University August 26, 2013 Outline 1 Riemnn Sums 2 Riemnn Integrls 3 Properties
More informationRiemann Sums and Riemann Integrals
Riemnn Sums nd Riemnn Integrls Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologicl Sciences nd Deprtment of Mthemticl Sciences Clemson University August 26, 203 Outline Riemnn Sums Riemnn Integrls Properties Abstrct
More informationDefinite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU. Simona Fišnarová (Mendel University) Definite integral MENDELU 1 / 30
Definite integrl Mthemtics FRDIS MENDELU Simon Fišnrová (Mendel University) Definite integrl MENDELU / Motivtion - re under curve Suppose, for simplicity, tht y = f(x) is nonnegtive nd continuous function
More informationPresentation Problems 5
Presenttion Problems 5 21-355 A For these problems, ssume ll sets re subsets of R unless otherwise specified. 1. Let P nd Q be prtitions of [, b] such tht P Q. Then U(f, P ) U(f, Q) nd L(f, P ) L(f, Q).
More informationAnalytical Methods Exam: Preparatory Exercises
Anlyticl Methods Exm: Preprtory Exercises Question. Wht does it men tht (X, F, µ) is mesure spce? Show tht µ is monotone, tht is: if E F re mesurble sets then µ(e) µ(f). Question. Discuss if ech of the
More informationUNIFORM CONVERGENCE. Contents 1. Uniform Convergence 1 2. Properties of uniform convergence 3
UNIFORM CONVERGENCE Contents 1. Uniform Convergence 1 2. Properties of uniform convergence 3 Suppose f n : Ω R or f n : Ω C is sequence of rel or complex functions, nd f n f s n in some sense. Furthermore,
More informationConvex Sets and Functions
B Convex Sets nd Functions Definition B1 Let L, +, ) be rel liner spce nd let C be subset of L The set C is convex if, for ll x,y C nd ll [, 1], we hve 1 )x+y C In other words, every point on the line
More informationDefinite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU
Definite integrl Mthemtics FRDIS MENDELU Simon Fišnrová Brno 1 Motivtion - re under curve Suppose, for simplicity, tht y = f(x) is nonnegtive nd continuous function defined on [, b]. Wht is the re of the
More informationHENSTOCK-KURZWEIL TYPE INTEGRATION OF RIESZ-SPACE-VALUED FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO WALSH SERIES
Rel Anlysis Exchnge Vol. 29(1), 2003/2004, pp. 419 439 A. Boccuto, Deprtment of Mtemtics nd Informtics, Universit di Perugi, vi Vnvitelli 1, 06123 Perugi, Itly. emil: boccuto@dipmt.unipg.it V. A. Skvortsov,
More informationS. S. Dragomir. 2, we have the inequality. b a
Bull Koren Mth Soc 005 No pp 3 30 SOME COMPANIONS OF OSTROWSKI S INEQUALITY FOR ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS S S Drgomir Abstrct Compnions of Ostrowski s integrl ineulity for bsolutely
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. III.1. Measurable functions. f 1 (
FUNDAMNTALS OF RAL ANALYSIS by Doğn Çömez III. MASURABL FUNCTIONS AND LBSGU INTGRAL III.. Mesurble functions Hving the Lebesgue mesure define, in this chpter, we will identify the collection of functions
More informationMath Solutions to homework 1
Mth 75 - Solutions to homework Cédric De Groote October 5, 07 Problem, prt : This problem explores the reltionship between norms nd inner products Let X be rel vector spce ) Suppose tht is norm on X tht
More informationKRASNOSEL SKII TYPE FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR NONLINEAR EXPANSION
Fixed Point Theory, 13(2012), No. 1, 285-291 http://www.mth.ubbcluj.ro/ nodecj/sfptcj.html KRASNOSEL SKII TYPE FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR NONLINEAR EXPANSION FULI WANG AND FENG WANG School of Mthemtics nd
More information7.2 Riemann Integrable Functions
7.2 Riemnn Integrble Functions Theorem 1. If f : [, b] R is step function, then f R[, b]. Theorem 2. If f : [, b] R is continuous on [, b], then f R[, b]. Theorem 3. If f : [, b] R is bounded nd continuous
More informationUNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE
UNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE 1. Pointwise Convergence of Sequence Let E be set nd Y be metric spce. Consider functions f n : E Y for n = 1, 2,.... We sy tht the sequence
More informationPositive Solutions of Operator Equations on Half-Line
Int. Journl of Mth. Anlysis, Vol. 3, 29, no. 5, 211-22 Positive Solutions of Opertor Equtions on Hlf-Line Bohe Wng 1 School of Mthemtics Shndong Administrtion Institute Jinn, 2514, P.R. Chin sdusuh@163.com
More informationNOTES AND PROBLEMS: INTEGRATION THEORY
NOTES AND PROBLEMS: INTEGRATION THEORY SAMEER CHAVAN Abstrct. These re the lecture notes prepred for prticipnts of AFS-I to be conducted t Kumun University, Almor from 1st to 27th December, 2014. Contents
More informationEntrance Exam, Real Analysis September 1, 2009 Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems. Compute the following and justify your computation: lim
1. Let n be positive integers. ntrnce xm, Rel Anlysis September 1, 29 Solve exctly 6 out of the 8 problems. Sketch the grph of the function f(x): f(x) = lim e x2n. Compute the following nd justify your
More informationChapter 22. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Version of 24.2.4 Chpter 22 The Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus In this chpter I ddress one of the most importnt properties of the Lebesgue integrl. Given n integrble function f : [,b] R, we cn form its indefinite
More informationMAT612-REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL
MAT612-REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL DR. RITU AGARWAL MALVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, JAIPUR, INDIA-302017 Tble of Contents Contents Tble of Contents 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Prtition
More informationSTUDY GUIDE FOR BASIC EXAM
STUDY GUIDE FOR BASIC EXAM BRYON ARAGAM This is prtil list of theorems tht frequently show up on the bsic exm. In mny cses, you my be sked to directly prove one of these theorems or these vrints. There
More informationAppendix to Notes 8 (a)
Appendix to Notes 8 () 13 Comprison of the Riemnn nd Lebesgue integrls. Recll Let f : [, b] R be bounded. Let D be prtition of [, b] such tht Let D = { = x 0 < x 1
More informationLecture 3 ( ) (translated and slightly adapted from lecture notes by Martin Klazar)
Lecture 3 (5.3.2018) (trnslted nd slightly dpted from lecture notes by Mrtin Klzr) Riemnn integrl Now we define precisely the concept of the re, in prticulr, the re of figure U(, b, f) under the grph of
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ca] 11 Jul 2011
rxiv:1107.1996v1 [mth.ca] 11 Jul 2011 Existence nd computtion of Riemnn Stieltjes integrls through Riemnn integrls July, 2011 Rodrigo López Pouso Deprtmento de Análise Mtemátic Fcultde de Mtemátics, Universidde
More informationS. S. Dragomir. 1. Introduction. In [1], Guessab and Schmeisser have proved among others, the following companion of Ostrowski s inequality:
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS NIŠ) Ser Mth Inform 9 00) 6 SOME COMPANIONS OF OSTROWSKI S INEQUALITY FOR ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS S S Drgomir Dedicted to Prof G Mstroinni for his 65th birthdy
More informationODE: Existence and Uniqueness of a Solution
Mth 22 Fll 213 Jerry Kzdn ODE: Existence nd Uniqueness of Solution The Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus tells us how to solve the ordinry differentil eqution (ODE) du = f(t) dt with initil condition u() =
More information1. On some properties of definite integrals. We prove
This short collection of notes is intended to complement the textbook Anlisi Mtemtic 2 by Crl Mdern, published by Città Studi Editore, [M]. We refer to [M] for nottion nd the logicl stremline of the rguments.
More informationFundamental Theorem of Calculus and Computations on Some Special Henstock-Kurzweil Integrals
Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus nd Computtions on Some Specil Henstock-Kurzweil Integrls Wei-Chi YANG wyng@rdford.edu Deprtment of Mthemtics nd Sttistics Rdford University Rdford, VA 24142 USA DING, Xiofeng
More informationA basic logarithmic inequality, and the logarithmic mean
Notes on Number Theory nd Discrete Mthemtics ISSN 30 532 Vol. 2, 205, No., 3 35 A bsic logrithmic inequlity, nd the logrithmic men József Sándor Deprtment of Mthemtics, Bbeş-Bolyi University Str. Koglnicenu
More informationAN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN NUMERICAL INTEGRATION
Applied Mthemtics E-Notes, 5(005), 53-60 c ISSN 1607-510 Avilble free t mirror sites of http://www.mth.nthu.edu.tw/ men/ AN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN NUMERICAL INTEGRATION
More informationII. Integration and Cauchy s Theorem
MTH6111 Complex Anlysis 2009-10 Lecture Notes c Shun Bullett QMUL 2009 II. Integrtion nd Cuchy s Theorem 1. Pths nd integrtion Wrning Different uthors hve different definitions for terms like pth nd curve.
More informationHomework 4. (1) If f R[a, b], show that f 3 R[a, b]. If f + (x) = max{f(x), 0}, is f + R[a, b]? Justify your answer.
Homework 4 (1) If f R[, b], show tht f 3 R[, b]. If f + (x) = mx{f(x), 0}, is f + R[, b]? Justify your nswer. (2) Let f be continuous function on [, b] tht is strictly positive except finitely mny points
More informationSome estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions
Annls of University of Criov, Mth. Comp. Sci. Ser. Volume 3, 7, Pges 8 87 ISSN: 13-693 Some estimtes on the Hermite-Hdmrd inequlity through qusi-convex functions Dniel Alexndru Ion Abstrct. In this pper
More informationNecessary and Sufficient Conditions for Differentiating Under the Integral Sign
Necessry nd Sufficient Conditions for Differentiting Under the Integrl Sign Erik Tlvil 1. INTRODUCTION. When we hve n integrl tht depends on prmeter, sy F(x f (x, y dy, it is often importnt to know when
More informationProperties of the Riemann Integral
Properties of the Riemnn Integrl Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologicl Sciences nd Deprtment of Mthemticl Sciences Clemson University Februry 15, 2018 Outline 1 Some Infimum nd Supremum Properties 2
More information1 i n x i x i 1. Note that kqk kp k. In addition, if P and Q are partition of [a, b], P Q is finer than both P and Q.
Chpter 6 Integrtion In this chpter we define the integrl. Intuitively, it should be the re under curve. Not surprisingly, fter mny exmples, counter exmples, exceptions, generliztions, the concept of the
More informationMath 324 Course Notes: Brief description
Brief description These re notes for Mth 324, n introductory course in Mesure nd Integrtion. Students re dvised to go through ll sections in detil nd ttempt ll problems. These notes will be modified nd
More informationMath 554 Integration
Mth 554 Integrtion Hndout #9 4/12/96 Defn. A collection of n + 1 distinct points of the intervl [, b] P := {x 0 = < x 1 < < x i 1 < x i < < b =: x n } is clled prtition of the intervl. In this cse, we
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ca] 9 Jun 2011
Men vlue integrl inequlities rxiv:1106.1807v1 [mth.ca] 9 Jun 2011 June, 2011 Rodrigo López Pouso Deprtment of Mthemticl Anlysis Fculty of Mthemtics, University of Sntigo de Compostel, 15782 Sntigo de Compostel,
More informationMATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 19: Riemann sums. Properties of integrals.
MATH 409 Advnced Clculus I Lecture 19: Riemnn sums. Properties of integrls. Drboux sums Let P = {x 0,x 1,...,x n } be prtition of n intervl [,b], where x 0 = < x 1 < < x n = b. Let f : [,b] R be bounded
More informationGeneralized Riemann Integral
Generlized Riemnn Integrl Krel Hrbcek The City College of New York, New York khrbcek@sci.ccny.cuny.edu July 27, 2014 These notes present the theory of generlized Riemnn integrl, due to R. Henstock nd J.
More informationIntegrals along Curves.
Integrls long Curves. 1. Pth integrls. Let : [, b] R n be continuous function nd let be the imge ([, b]) of. We refer to both nd s curve. If we need to distinguish between the two we cll the function the
More informationChapter 4. Lebesgue Integration
4.2. Lebesgue Integrtion 1 Chpter 4. Lebesgue Integrtion Section 4.2. Lebesgue Integrtion Note. Simple functions ply the sme role to Lebesgue integrls s step functions ply to Riemnn integrtion. Definition.
More informationAbstract inner product spaces
WEEK 4 Abstrct inner product spces Definition An inner product spce is vector spce V over the rel field R equipped with rule for multiplying vectors, such tht the product of two vectors is sclr, nd the
More informationMath 61CM - Solutions to homework 9
Mth 61CM - Solutions to homework 9 Cédric De Groote November 30 th, 2018 Problem 1: Recll tht the left limit of function f t point c is defined s follows: lim f(x) = l x c if for ny > 0 there exists δ
More informationLecture 3. Limits of Functions and Continuity
Lecture 3 Limits of Functions nd Continuity Audrey Terrs April 26, 21 1 Limits of Functions Notes I m skipping the lst section of Chpter 6 of Lng; the section bout open nd closed sets We cn probbly live
More information1 The Riemann Integral
The Riemnn Integrl. An exmple leding to the notion of integrl (res) We know how to find (i.e. define) the re of rectngle (bse height), tringle ( (sum of res of tringles). But how do we find/define n re
More informationHilbert Spaces. Chapter Inner product spaces
Chpter 4 Hilbert Spces 4.1 Inner product spces In the following we will discuss both complex nd rel vector spces. With L denoting either R or C we recll tht vector spce over L is set E equipped with ddition,
More informationBest Approximation in the 2-norm
Jim Lmbers MAT 77 Fll Semester 1-11 Lecture 1 Notes These notes correspond to Sections 9. nd 9.3 in the text. Best Approximtion in the -norm Suppose tht we wish to obtin function f n (x) tht is liner combintion
More informationASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF INTERMEDIATE POINTS IN CERTAIN MEAN VALUE THEOREMS. II
STUDIA UNIV. BABEŞ BOLYAI, MATHEMATICA, Volume LV, Number 3, September 2010 ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF INTERMEDIATE POINTS IN CERTAIN MEAN VALUE THEOREMS. II TIBERIU TRIF Dedicted to Professor Grigore Ştefn
More informationMath 360: A primitive integral and elementary functions
Mth 360: A primitive integrl nd elementry functions D. DeTurck University of Pennsylvni October 16, 2017 D. DeTurck Mth 360 001 2017C: Integrl/functions 1 / 32 Setup for the integrl prtitions Definition:
More informationON A CONVEXITY PROPERTY. 1. Introduction Most general class of convex functions is defined by the inequality
Krgujevc Journl of Mthemtics Volume 40( (016, Pges 166 171. ON A CONVEXITY PROPERTY SLAVKO SIMIĆ Abstrct. In this rticle we proved n interesting property of the clss of continuous convex functions. This
More informationPrinciples of Real Analysis I Fall VI. Riemann Integration
21-355 Principles of Rel Anlysis I Fll 2004 A. Definitions VI. Riemnn Integrtion Let, b R with < b be given. By prtition of [, b] we men finite set P [, b] with, b P. The set of ll prtitions of [, b] will
More informationMath Advanced Calculus II
Mth 452 - Advnced Clculus II Line Integrls nd Green s Theorem The min gol of this chpter is to prove Stoke s theorem, which is the multivrible version of the fundmentl theorem of clculus. We will be focused
More informationLAPLACE TRANSFORM USING THE HENSTOCK-KURZWEIL INTEGRAL
REVISTA DE LA UNIÓN MATEMÁTICA ARGENTINA Vol. 55, No. 1, 214, Pges 71 81 Published online: June 2, 214 LAPLACE TRANSFORM USING THE HENSTOCK-KURZWEIL INTEGRAL SALVADOR SÁNCHEZ-PERALES AND JESÚS F. TENORIO
More informationg i fφdx dx = x i i=1 is a Hilbert space. We shall, henceforth, abuse notation and write g i f(x) = f
1. Appliction of functionl nlysis to PEs 1.1. Introduction. In this section we give little introduction to prtil differentil equtions. In prticulr we consider the problem u(x) = f(x) x, u(x) = x (1) where
More informationGENERALIZED ABSTRACTED MEAN VALUES
GENERALIZED ABSTRACTED MEAN VALUES FENG QI Abstrct. In this rticle, the uthor introduces the generlized bstrcted men vlues which etend the concepts of most mens with two vribles, nd reserches their bsic
More informationChapter 0. What is the Lebesgue integral about?
Chpter 0. Wht is the Lebesgue integrl bout? The pln is to hve tutoril sheet ech week, most often on Fridy, (to be done during the clss) where you will try to get used to the ides introduced in the previous
More information11 An introduction to Riemann Integration
11 An introduction to Riemnn Integrtion The PROOFS of the stndrd lemms nd theorems concerning the Riemnn Integrl re NEB, nd you will not be sked to reproduce proofs of these in full in the exmintion in
More informationHenstock Kurzweil delta and nabla integrals
Henstock Kurzweil delt nd nbl integrls Alln Peterson nd Bevn Thompson Deprtment of Mthemtics nd Sttistics, University of Nebrsk-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0323 peterso@mth.unl.edu Mthemtics, SPS, The University
More informationFourier series. Preliminary material on inner products. Suppose V is vector space over C and (, )
Fourier series. Preliminry mteril on inner products. Suppose V is vector spce over C nd (, ) is Hermitin inner product on V. This mens, by definition, tht (, ) : V V C nd tht the following four conditions
More informationTheoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature
Theoreticl foundtions of Gussin qudrture 1 Inner product vector spce Definition 1. A vector spce (or liner spce) is set V = {u, v, w,...} in which the following two opertions re defined: (A) Addition of
More informationPROBLEMS AND NOTES: UNIFORM CONVERGENCE AND POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION
PROBLEMS AND NOTES: UNIFORM CONVERGENCE AND POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION SAMEER CHAVAN Abstrct. These re the lecture notes prepred for the prticipnts of IST to be conducted t BP, Pune from 3rd to 15th November,
More informationRiemann Stieltjes Integration - Definition and Existence of Integral
- Definition nd Existence of Integrl Dr. Adity Kushik Directorte of Distnce Eduction Kurukshetr University, Kurukshetr Hryn 136119 Indi. Prtition Riemnn Stieltjes Sums Refinement Definition Given closed
More informationSet Integral Equations in Metric Spaces
Mthemtic Morvic Vol. 13-1 2009, 95 102 Set Integrl Equtions in Metric Spces Ion Tişe Abstrct. Let P cp,cvr n be the fmily of ll nonempty compct, convex subsets of R n. We consider the following set integrl
More informationLecture 1: Introduction to integration theory and bounded variation
Lecture 1: Introduction to integrtion theory nd bounded vrition Wht is this course bout? Integrtion theory. The first question you might hve is why there is nything you need to lern bout integrtion. You
More informationMATH34032: Green s Functions, Integral Equations and the Calculus of Variations 1
MATH34032: Green s Functions, Integrl Equtions nd the Clculus of Vritions 1 Section 1 Function spces nd opertors Here we gives some brief detils nd definitions, prticulrly relting to opertors. For further
More informationWeek 7 Riemann Stieltjes Integration: Lectures 19-21
Week 7 Riemnn Stieltjes Integrtion: Lectures 19-21 Lecture 19 Throughout this section α will denote monotoniclly incresing function on n intervl [, b]. Let f be bounded function on [, b]. Let P = { = 0
More informationAsymptotic behavior of intermediate points in certain mean value theorems. III
Stud. Univ. Bbeş-Bolyi Mth. 59(2014), No. 3, 279 288 Asymptotic behvior of intermedite points in certin men vlue theorems. III Tiberiu Trif Abstrct. The pper is devoted to the study of the symptotic behvior
More informationJournal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics
Journl of Inequlities in Pure nd Applied Mthemtics GENERALIZATIONS OF THE TRAPEZOID INEQUALITIES BASED ON A NEW MEAN VALUE THEOREM FOR THE REMAINDER IN TAYLOR S FORMULA volume 7, issue 3, rticle 90, 006.
More informationp-adic Egyptian Fractions
p-adic Egyptin Frctions Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Trditionl Egyptin Frctions nd Greedy Algorithm 2 3 Set-up 3 4 p-greedy Algorithm 5 5 p-egyptin Trditionl 10 6 Conclusion 1 Introduction An Egyptin frction
More information