TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY IN MULTI-STORY STRUCTURES
|
|
- Shana Sullivan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY IN MULTI-STORY STRUCTURES Günay Özmen Konuralp Girgin Yavuz Durgun
2 ABSTRACT In contemporary earthquake-regulations, effects of torsional irregularity are represented by augmenting accidental lateral load eccentricities by a factor which depends on the so called torsional irregularity coefficient. The purpose of this study is first to determine the conditions for excessive torsional irregularity and then to discuss the validity of code provisions. In order to achieve this aim, a parametric investigation is performed on six groups of typical structures with varying structural wall positions and story numbers. It is found that torsional irregularity coefficients increase as the story numbers decrease, i.e. maximum irregularity coefficients occur for single-story structures. They reach maximum values when the asymmetrical structural walls are placed as close as possible to the gravity centers. On the other hand, floor rotations increase in proportion to the story numbers i.e. maximum floor rotations occur for highest story numbers. They attain their maximum values for the structures where the walls are in farthest positions from the gravity centers. It is found that the results obtained for torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations are quite contradictory. A provisional new definition for torsional irregularity coefficient based on floor rotations is proposed. Keywords: Earthquake regulations, torsional irregularity, parametric investigation, floor rotations.
3 CONTENTS Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. CODE PROVISIONS FOR TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY TYPICAL STRUCTURES INVESTIGATION OF TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY COEFFICIENT STRUCTURE GROUP WİTH FIVE AXES Structures Type A with Five Axes All Structure Types with Five Axes STRUCTURE GROUP WİTH SIX AXES Structures Type A with Six Axes All Structure Types with Six Axes STRUCTURE GROUP WİTH SEVEN AXES Structures Type A with Seven Axes All Structure Types with Seven Axes GENERAL EVALUATION INVESTIGATION OF FLOOR ROTATIONS STRUCTURE GROUP WİTH FIVE AXES All Structure Types with Five Axes STRUCTURE GROUP WİTH SIX AXES All Structure Types with Six Axes STRUCTURE GROUP WİTH SEVEN AXES All Structure Types with Seven Axes GENERAL EVALUATION A NEW TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY DEFINITION PROPOSAL CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES... 37
4 1. INTRODUCTION Earthquake field investigations repeatedly confirm that irregular structures suffer more damage than their regular counterparts. Torsional irregularity is one of the most important factors, which produces severe damage (even collapse) for the structures. A large number of studies exist which investigate various aspects of torsional irregularity including Geometric asymmetry, [1], [2], [3], Stiffness distribution, [2], [4], [5], Analysis methods, (static, dynamic, non-linear, pushover, capacity analyses etc.), [6], [7], [8], [9], Comparison and discussion of code provisions, [10], [11], [12], [13] Experimental studies, [14], [15]. Regarding the torsional irregularities, most of the codes have similar provisions which are basically based on principles of the well known standard of IBC09 (UBC97, ASCE7), [16], [17], [18]. A certain number of studies are devoted to the discussion and interpretation of the provisions in UBC97, IBC09 and other seismic codes. Duan and Chandler have proposed an optimized procedure for seismic design of torsionally unbalanced structures, [1]. Ozmen (2002) has investigated geometric and structural aspects of torsional irregularity according to Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC), [2]. Demir et al. have investigated torsional irregularity factors which effect multi storey shear wall-frame systems according to TEC, [3]. Six type structures which have different story numbers, plan views and shear wall locations were analyzed. Ozmen (2004) has determined the structural wall positions which cause excessive torsional irregularity according to TEC and discussed the related code provisions, [4]. Tezcan and Alhan have proposed an increase in the calculated eccentricity in order to ensure an added and inherent safety for the flexible side elements, [5]. Penelis and Kappos have presented a methodology for modeling the inelastic torsional response of buildings in nonlinear static (pushover) analysis, aiming to reproduce the results of inelastic dynamic time history analysis, [6]. Dogangun and Livaoglu have examined the differences in results obtained by Equivalent Seismic Load Method, Mode-Superposition Method and Analysis Method in Time Domain, [7]. They presented some recommendations related to the usage of seismic analysis methods. Jinjie et al. developed a torsion angle capacity spectrum method for the performance-based seismic evaluation of irregular framed structures, [8]. Mahdi and Gharaie have evaluated the seismic behavior of three intermediate moment-resisting concrete space frames with unsymmetrical plan by using pushover analysis, [9]. Cosenza et al. have compared most of the results existing in the literature, suggested proposals of modification and underlined the importance of further studies in order to evaluate a condition of minimum torsional stiffness, [10]. Bosco et al. described a study devoted to define the application limits of an approximated design method about non-regularly asymmetric systems, [11]. They anticipated that to define clear limits is possible in seismic codes for the simplified approaches on irregular structures. Zheng et al. studied the criterion and relative regulations for torsional irregularity in UBC97 and EC8, [12]. The results obtained from the codes were compared and analyzed from the theoretical and practical aspects. Ozhendekci and Polat have introduced a parameter Q which is a ratio of the effective modal masses to be used to define the torsional irregularity of buildings, [13]. The code proposed ratio for the definition of the torsional irregularities is compared with the modified Q ratio. Jeong and Elnashai (2004) have proposed a layering technique, termed Planar Decomposition which furnishes detailed information on the demand and capacity of critical members, [14]. Jeong and Elnashai (2006) have described a local damage index that is sensitive to out-of-plane responses is and presented a method to combine local damage indices, [15]. 1
5 Torsional irregularity which is recognized in most of the seismic design codes, varies depending on a number of factors including Plan geometry, Dimensions and positions of structural elements, Story numbers. The purpose of this study is first to determine the conditions for excessive torsional irregularity and then to discuss the validity of code provisions. In order to achieve this aim, a parametric investigation is performed on six groups of Typical structures with varying structural wall positions and story numbers. axes of typical structure groups is varied between 5, 6 and 7 while story numbers are chosen as 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. All the structures are chosen as symmetrical in plan with respect to horizontal axis X. Hence, the behavior of structures will be examined only for the lateral loading in vertical Y direction only. 2. CODE PROVISIONS FOR TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY The provisions of IBC09 regarding the torsional irregularities are summarized in the following, [15]. Here the accidental lateral load eccentricities of ±5% are amplified by the amplification factor 2 δ A where δ max = the maximum displacement at Level x computed assuming A x = 1, δ avg = the average of the displacements at the extreme points of the structure at Level x computed assuming A x = 1. max x = (2.1) 1.2δ avg Extreme and average displacements at Level x are shown in Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Extreme and average displacements The torsional amplification factor (A x ) shall not be less than 1 and is not required to exceed 3.0. These provisions may be expressed alternatively as follows: Torsional irregularity coefficient η t is defined by 2
6 δ max η t =. (2.2) δavg Then a) If η t 1. 2 then torsional irregularity does not exist, i.e. A x = 1; b) If 1.2 < ηt then torsional irregularity exists and eccentricity amplification factor is computed by 2 ηt x = ; (2.3) A 1.2 c) If η t > then η t = (A x = 3.0). In the following investigations the torsional irregularity coefficient η t is considered as the main parameter. 3. TYPICAL STRUCTURES The 6 groups of Typical Structures, which are selected to carry out the parametric study, are chosen as multi-story buildings composed of frames and walls. It has been shown previously that in terms of torsional irregularity, structural stiffness distribution is more effective than geometrical asymmetry, [2]. Hence the typical structures are chosen as having asymmetric walls in a rectangular plan. All structures are composed of m 2 modules. Schematic floor plans of typical structures having 6 axes in direction X, which are designated as types A, B, C, D, E and F, are shown in Figure 3.1. As can be seen in the figure, all the typical structures are symmetrical about axis X. The structural walls in direction Y are on the left edge of the floor plan for structure type A. Structure types B, C, D, E and F are obtained by shifting the centers of gravity of walls by ½, 1, 1½, 2 and 2½ modules, respectively, in direction X. All the wall thicknesses are 25 cm and beam cross sections are cm 2. Column dimensions vary between cm 2 and cm 2. Schematic floor plans of typical structure type A with 5, 6 and 7 axes in Y direction are shown in Figure 3.2. Floor plans of structure types B, C, D, E and F with the same number of axes are organized similarly. 3
7 Figure 3.1: Schematic Floor Plans of Typical Structures with 6 Axes 4
8 Figure 3.2: Schematic floor plans of structure type A with 5, 6 and 7 axes The parametric studies of this study are independent of the magnitude of seismic forces that affect the structure. However, since it is aimed to obtain realistic results, the dimensions of the structural elements are determined by using a preliminary design process. Seismic parameters used in the analyses and designs of typical structures are as follows: MCE Spectral Acceleration Parameters S MS = 0.75g S M1 = 0.33g Site Coefficients F a = 1 F v = 1 Importance Factor I = 1 Response Modification Coefficient R = 7 Schematic elevation of typical structures is shown in Figure 3.3. Story heights for all the typical structures are 4.00 m for lowermost story and 3.00 m for upper stories. 5
9 Figure 3.3: Schematic elevation of typical structures It is assumed that centers of gravity of stories are at the geometric centers of floor plans. Since all the typical structures are symmetrical with respect to axes X, investigations will be carried out only for loadings in direction Y. In lateral load analyses the unfavorable accidental eccentricity of +5% will be considered. Typical structures groups consist of structures with 5, 6 and 7 axes in Y direction. Structure types included in these groups are shown in Table 3.1. Table 3.1: Included structure types axes Types included 5 A, B, C, D 6 A, B, C, D, E, F 7 A, B, C, D, E, F Each group comprises of structures with 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 stories. Thus the total number of investigated structures becomes 96. In the following, the structure groups with 5, 6 and 7 axes will be considered in turn and torsional irregularity properties will be investigated. 6
10 4. INVESTIGATION OF TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY COEFFICIENT In this section, the structure groups with 5, 6 and 7 axes will be considered, the maximum torsional irregularity coefficient for each typical structure will be determined and the results will be discussed STRUCTURE GROUP WITH FIVE AXES In this section seismic analysis of typical structures with 5 axes will be performed and the maximum torsional irregularity coefficients will be determined. Above given seismic parameters will be used in the analyses. Weights of uppermost, intermediate and lowermost stories are 1600 kn, 2120 kn and 2760 kn, respectively. Fundamental period in direction Y and corresponding equivalent lateral forces are computed only for typical structure type A. Lateral loads of same magnitude are used in the analyses of other types in order to obtain a sound comparison. Column, beam and wall dimensions are selected similarly for all typical structures. Floor plans of structure types A, B, C and D with 5 axes are shown in Figures 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4, respectively. Figure 4.1: Floor plan of structure type A with 5 axes 7
11 Figure 4.2: Floor plan of structure type B with 5 axes Figure 4.3: Floor plan of structure type C with 5 axes 8
12 Figure 4.4: Floor plan of structure type D with 5 axes Since the types E and F do not give unfavorable results of torsional irregularity, seismic analyses for these types are not included in the investigation. Cross sections of the columns which are denoted by C1, C2 and C3 in the floor plans are shown in Table 4.1. Total number of stories Table 4.1: Column cross sections (cm cm) Story No. C1 C2 C
13 Structures Type A with Five Axes The details of the seismic analyses performed by using the above given parameters are not shown herein for the sake of brevity. Lateral loads, minimum, average and maximum story displacements, (δ min, δ avg and δ max ) together with torsional irregularity coefficients η t are shown in Tables 4.2 ~ 4.7 for structures with story numbers 1 ~ 10, respectively. Table 4.2: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficient for single story structure Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Table 4.3: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 2-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.4: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 4-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.5: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 6-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max
14 Table 4.6: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 8-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.7: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 10-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max It must be noted that maximum irregularity coefficient for all story numbers occur at lowermost stories. Variation of torsional irregularity coefficient will be discussed after the inspection of other structure types. 11
15 All Structure Types with Five Axes Similar analyses are performed for types B, C and D with 5 axes and torsional irregularity coefficients are computed. As have been mentioned above, lateral loads used in these analyses are the same as those used for structures type A. Maximum torsional irregularity coefficients for all types with 5 axes are shown in Table 4.8. Table 4.8: Maximum torsional irregularity coefficients for structures with 5 axes Structure type stories A B C D Maximum values at each row are shown with bold numerals. Interpretation of the results will be presented in a separate section. 12
16 4.2. STRUCTURE GROUP WITH SIX AXES In this section seismic analysis of typical structures with 6 axes will be performed and the maximum torsional irregularity coefficients will be determined. Here again, above given seismic parameters will be used and equivalent lateral forces are computed only for typical structure type A. Weights of uppermost, intermediate and lowermost stories are 1920 kn, 2780 kn and 3310 kn, respectively. Column, beam and wall dimensions are selected similarly for all typical structures. Floor plans of structure types A, B, C, D, E and F with 6 axes are shown in Figures 4.5 ~ 4.10, respectively. Figure 4.5: Floor plan of structure type A with 6 axes Figure 4.6: Floor plan of structure type B with 6 axes 13
17 Figure 4.7: Floor plan of structure type C with 6 axes Figure 4.8: Floor plan of structure type D with 6 axes 14
18 Figure 4.9: Floor plan of structure type E with 6 axes Figure 4.10: Floor plan of structure type F with 6 axes Cross sections of the columns which are denoted by C1, C2 and C3 in the floor plans are again as shown in Table Structures Type A with Six Axes The details of the seismic analyses performed by using the above given parameters are not shown herein for the sake of brevity. Lateral loads, minimum, average and maximum story displacements, (δ min, δ avg and δ max ) together with torsional irregularity coefficients η t are shown in Tables 4.9 ~ 4.14 for structures with story numbers 1 ~ 10, respectively. Table 4.9: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficient for single story structure Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg )
19 Table 4.10: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficient for 2-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.11: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 4-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.12: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 6-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.13: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 8-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max
20 Table 4.14: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 10-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Here again maximum irregularity coefficient for all story numbers occur at lowermost stories. Variation of torsional irregularity coefficient will be discussed after the inspection of other structure types All Structure Types with Six Axes Similar analyses are performed for types B, C, D, E and F with 6 axes and torsional irregularity coefficients are computed. As have been mentioned above, lateral loads used in these analyses are the same as those used for structures type A. Maximum torsional irregularity coefficients for all types with 6 axes are shown in Table Table 4.15: Maximum torsional irregularity coefficients for structures with 6 axes Structure type stories A B C D E F Maximum values at each row are shown with bold numerals. Interpretation of the results will be presented in a separate section. 17
21 4.3. STRUCTURE GROUP WITH SEVEN AXES In this section seismic analysis of typical structures with 7 axes will be performed and the maximum torsional irregularity coefficients will be determined. Here again, above given seismic parameters will be used and equivalent lateral forces are computed only for typical structure type A. Weights of uppermost, intermediate and lowermost stories are 2240 kn, 3240 kn and 3860 kn, respectively. Column, beam and wall dimensions are selected similarly for all typical structures. Floor plans of structure types A, B, C, D, E and F with 7 axes are shown in Figures 4.11 ~ 4.16, respectively. Figure 4.11: Floor plan of structure type A with 7 axes Figure 4.12: Floor plan of structure type B with 7 axes 18
22 Figure 4.13: Floor plan of structure type C with 7 axes Figure 4.14: Floor plan of structure type D with 7 axes Figure 4.15: Floor plan of structure type E with 7 axes 19
23 Figure 4.16: Floor plan of structure type F with 7 axes Cross sections of the columns which are denoted by C1, C2 and C3 in the floor plans are again as shown in Table Structures Type A with Seven Axes The details of the seismic analyses performed by using the above given parameters are not shown herein for the sake of brevity. Lateral loads, minimum, average and maximum story displacements, (δ min, δ avg and δ max ) together with torsional irregularity coefficients η t are shown in Tables 4.16 ~ 4.21 for structures with story numbers 1 ~ 10, respectively. Table 4.16: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficient for single story structure Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Table 4.17: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 2-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.18: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 4-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max
24 Table 4.19: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 6-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.20: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 8-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Table 4.21: Story displacements and torsional irregularity coefficients for 10-story structure Story No. Lateral load (kn) δ min δ avg δ max η t (δ max /δ avg ) Max Here again maximum irregularity coefficient for all story numbers occur at lowermost stories. Variation of torsional irregularity coefficient will be discussed after the inspection of other structure types. 21
25 All Structure Types with Seven Axes Similar analyses are performed for types B, C, D, E and F with 7 axes and torsional irregularity coefficients are computed. As have been mentioned above, lateral loads used in these analyses are the same as those used for structures type A. Maximum torsional irregularity coefficients for all types with 7 axes are shown in Table Table 4.22: Maximum torsional irregularity coefficients for structures with 7 axes Structure type stories A B C D E F Maximum values at each row are shown with bold numerals. Interpretation of the results will be presented in the following section GENERAL EVALUATION In the preceding sections, seismic analyses of 96 typical structures with varying story numbers and structural wall positions have been performed. Maximum irregularity coefficients shown in Tables 4.8, 4.15 and 4.22 are represented graphically in Figures 4.17, 4.18 and 4.19, respectively. Figure 4.17: Variation of maximum irregularity coefficient for structures with 5 axes 22
26 Figure 4.18: Variation of maximum irregularity coefficient for structures with 6 axes It is observed that Figure 4.19: Variation of maximum irregularity coefficient for structures with 7 axes Maximum irregularity for all types occurs for single stories, Maximum irregularity for all story numbers occurs when the asymmetric walls are placed as close as possible to the gravity centers. 40 of the investigated 96 structures (42%) are subjected to excessive torsional irregularity. According to the code, these structures will be designed as having an irregularity coefficient of η t = (A x = 3.00), [15]. This situation may be considered as being quite peculiar. 23
27 For structures with 5, 6 and 7 axes, the structure types i.e. wall positions corresponding to maximum η t values are shown in Figure Figure 4.20: Structure types corresponding to maximum η t values These wall positions are quite unexpected since they correspond to almost symmetrical arrangements. It is also observed in the preceding investigations that floor rotation angles are somewhat greater for the structures with walls near the floor edges as well as structures with higher number of stories. It is believed that floor rotation angles θ reflect the torsional behavior of the structures more realistically. Therefore, floor rotations of the typical structures should be investigated in detail. In the following, floor rotation angles will be examined and compared with the corresponding torsional irregularity coefficients. 24
28 5. INVESTIGATION OF FLOOR ROTATIONS In the seismic analyses presented in the preceding sections, it is assumed that the floors act as rigid elements in their own planes and the structures undergo a displacement as shown schematically in Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Schematic displacement diagram As can be seen in the figure, all stories undergo a rotation as well as displacements in two directions. In the following, the structure groups with 5, 6 and 7 axes will be considered in turn and these rotations will be examined STRUCTURE GROUP WITH FIVE AXES As an illustrative example of structures with five axes, torsional irregularity coefficients η t and floor rotations θ of the 10-story Type A structure are shown in Table 5.1. Enlarged δ floor displacements are also shown schematically in Figure 5.2. Table 5.1: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations Story No. η t 10 3 θ (δ max /δ ort ) (radian) Max
29 Figure 5.2: Floor displacement diagrams As can be seen by inspecting both Table 5.1 and Figure 5.2, floor rotation angles significantly increase upwards, whereas the torsional irregularity coefficients decrease. It may be concluded that, torsional irregularity coefficients η t do not represent the torsional behavior accurately All Structure Types with Five Axes Torsional irregularity coefficients together with maximum rotation angles for all structure types with five axes are shown in Tables 5.2 ~ 5.5. Table 5.2: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type A stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian)
30 Table 5.3: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type B stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.4: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type C stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.5: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type D stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Maximum floor rotations for all types with 5 axes are shown in Table 5.6. Table 5.6: Maximum floor rotations for structures with 5 axes Structure type stories A B C D Maximum values at each row are shown with bold numerals. Interpretation of the results will be presented in a separate section. 27
31 5.2. STRUCTURE GROUP WITH SIX AXES As an illustrative example of structures with six axes, torsional irregularity coefficients η t and floor rotations θ of the 10-story Type A structure are shown in Table 5.7. Floor displacement diagrams are also shown schematically in Figure 5.3. Table 5.7: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations Story No. η t 10 3 θ (δ max /δ ort ) (radian) Max Figure 5.3: Floor displacement diagrams It is seen that for this type also, floor rotation angles increase upwards, while the torsional irregularity coefficients decrease. 28
32 All Structure Types with Six Axes Torsional irregularity coefficients together with maximum rotation angles for all structure types with six axes are shown in Tables 5.8 ~ Table 5.8: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type A stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.9: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type B stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.10: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type C stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.11: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type D stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian)
33 Table 5.12: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type E stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.13: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type F stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Maximum floor rotations for all types with 6 axes are shown in Table Table 5.14: Maximum floor rotations for structures with 6 axes Structure type stories A B C D E F Maximum values at each row are shown with bold numerals. Interpretation of the results will be presented in a separate section. 30
34 5.3. STRUCTURE GROUP WITH SEVEN AXES As an illustrative example of structures with seven axes, torsional irregularity coefficients η t and floor rotations θ of the 10-story Type A structure are shown in Table Floor displacement diagrams are also shown schematically in Figure 5.4. Table 5.15: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations Story No. η t 10 3 θ (δ max /δ ort ) (radian) Max Figure 5.4: Floor displacement diagrams It is seen that for this type also, floor rotation angles increase upwards, while the torsional irregularity coefficients decrease. 31
35 All Structure Types with Seven Axes Torsional irregularity coefficients together with maximum rotation angles for all structure types with seven axes are shown in Tables 5.16 ~ Table 5.16: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type A stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.17: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type B stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.18: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type C stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.19: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type D stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian)
36 Table 5.20: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type E stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Table 5.21: Torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations for Type F stories η t,max 10 3 θ max (radian) Maximum floor rotations for all types with 7 axes are shown in Table Table 5.22: Maximum floor rotations for structures with 7 axes Structure type stories A B C D E F Maximum values at each row are shown with bold numerals. Interpretation of the results will be presented in the following section. 33
37 5.4. GENERAL EVALUATION In the preceding sections, floor rotations resulting from the seismic analyses of 96 typical structures have been presented. Maximum floor rotations shown in Tables 5.6, 5.14 and 5.22 are represented graphically in Figures 5.5, 5.6 and 5.7, respectively. Figure 5.5: Variation of floor rotations for structures with 5 axes Figure 5.6: Variation of floor rotations for structures with 6 axes 34
38 Figure 5.7: Variation of floor rotations for structures with 7 axes It is observed that Maximum irregularity for all types occurs for 10-story structures, Maximum irregularity occurs for Type A structures. It is seen that these observations are quite contradictory with those obtained for torsional irregularity coefficients in Section 4.4. Scattering of floor rotations θ with respect to torsional irregularity coefficients η t is shown in Figure 5.8. Figure 5.8: Scattering of floor rotations with respect to torsional irregularity coefficients 35
39 It is clearly seen that, floor rotations which may be considered as being the real indicator of the torsional behavior, are far from being compatible with the torsional irregularity coefficients. In fact, it can be said that these quantities are inversely proportional to each other. Examination of the above mentioned observations yields the following conclusions: Torsional irregularity coefficients as defined in the regulations do not represent the torsional characteristics of the structures realistically, Code definitions of torsional irregularity coefficients should be completely amended. 6. A NEW TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY DEFINITION PROPOSAL It is asserted in the preceding sections that the torsional behavior of structures is represented more realistically by rotations θ of rigid floors. Hence, the new definition for torsional irregularity coefficient is proposed as η ti = Kθ i (6.1) where θ i denotes the rotation of the i th floor in radians. Considering the structures inspected in this study a preliminary value for the coefficient K may be recommended as K = (6.2) It must be considered natural to impose an upper bound for floor rotations similar to the drift limits existing in the regulations. An appropriate limitation for floor rotations is proposed as 3 θ 1.5. (6.3) i 10 It must be noted that this proposal is only provisional. An amendment of the definition for torsional irregularity coefficient seems to be a necessity but should be determined by using further comprehensive investigations on the subject. 7. CONCLUSIONS In this study a parametric investigation is performed on six groups of structures with varying structural wall positions and story numbers. Findings on lateral load analyses are evaluated and the following conclusions are derived: 1. For all the investigated structures, torsional irregularity coefficients increase as the story numbers decrease, i.e. maximum irregularity coefficients occur for single-story structures. 2. Floor rotations increase in proportion to the story numbers i.e. maximum floor rotations occur for highest story numbers. 3. Torsional irregularity coefficients reach maximum values when the structural walls are placed as close as possible to the gravity centers without coinciding them. 4. Floor rotations attain their maximum values for the structures where the walls are in farthest positions from the gravity centers. 5. It is seen that the results obtained for torsional irregularity coefficients and floor rotations are quite contradictory. 6. Since the floor rotations may be considered as the real representative of the torsional behavior, torsional irregularity coefficients as defined in the regulations should be completely amended. 7. A provisional new definition for torsional irregularity coefficient is proposed. 36
40 8. REFERENCES [1] Duan, XN., Chandler, AM., An optimized procedure for seismic design of torsionally unbalanced structures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 26:7, (1997), pp [2] Ozmen, G., Structural Aspects of Torsional Irregularity, Fifth International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Istanbul, [3] Demir, A., Demir, D.D., Erdem, R.T., Bagci, M., Torsional irregularity effects of local site classes in multiple storey structures, International journal of research and reviews in applied sciences, (August 2010), pp [4] Ozmen, G., Excessive Torsional Irregularity in Multi-Storey Structures, İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası Teknik Dergi Digest, Vol.15, No.1, (2004), pp [5] Tezcan, S.S., Alhan, C., Parametric analysis of irregular structures under seismic loading according to the new Turkish Earthquake Code, Engineering Structures, 23, (2001), pp [6] Penelis, Gr.G., Kappos, A.J., 3D pushover analysis: the issue of torsion, 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering Paper Reference: 015, (2002). [7] Dogangun, A., Livaoglu, R. Comparison of seismic analysis methods for multistory buildings, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3-8 September, (2006), Paper No [8] Jinjie, M., Qingxuan, S., Qi, Z, Method of performance based seismic evaluation for irregular plane reinforced concrete frame structures, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, Beijing, China, (2008). [9] Mahdi, T., Gharaie, V.S., Plan irregular RC frames: comparison of pushover with nonlinear dynamic analysis, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) Vol. 12, No. 6, (2011), pp [10] Cosenza E., Manfredi G., Realfonzo R., Torsional effects and regularity conditions in RC buildings, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 30 January-4 February, (2000). [11] Bosco, M., Marino, E., Rossi, P.P., Limits of application of simplified design procedures to nonregularly asymmetric buildings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2004), Paper No [12] Zheng, N., Yang, Z., Shi, C., Chang, Z., Analysis of criterion for torsional irregularity of seismic structures, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. August 1-6, (2004), Paper No [13] Ozhendekci, N., Polat, Z., Torsional irregularity of buildings, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Oct , Beijing, China, (2008). [14] Jeong S.H., Elnashai, A.S., Analytical and experimental seismic assessment of irregular RC buildings, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. August 1-6, (2004), Paper No [15] Jeong S.H., Elnashai, A.S., New three-dimensional damage index for RC buildings with planar irregularities, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 9, (September 2006). [16] International Building Code (IBC09), International Code Council (ICC), (2009). [17] UBC97, Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Vol.2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions, USA, (1997). [18] Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, (ASCE7), American Society of Civil Engineers, (2010). 37
TORSIONAL EFFECTS AND REGULARITY CONDITIONS IN RC BUILDINGS
TORSIONAL EFFECTS AND REGULARITY CONDITIONS IN RC BUILDINGS Edoardo COSENZA 1, Gaetano MANFREDI And Roberto REALFONZO 3 SUMMARY Earthquake damages at the perimeter of buildings are often the result of
More informationCOLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES
th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, Paper No. 6 COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES Jaime DE-LA-COLINA, MariCarmen HERNANDEZ
More informationINELASTIC EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO TORSION
INELASTIC EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO TORSION Kyriakos G STATHOPOULOS 1 And Stavros A ANAGNOSTOPOULOS 2 SUMMARY The inelastic seismic torsional response of simple structures is examined
More informationCHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.
CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus
More informationSoil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition
ABSTRACT: Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition G. Dok ve O. Kırtel Res. Assist., Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya University,
More informationCAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 004 Paper No. 653 CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN B. K. Raghu Prasad 1, A. Seetha Ramaiah and A.
More informationA METHOD OF LOAD INCREMENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SECOND-ORDER LIMIT LOAD AND COLLAPSE SAFETY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED STRUCTURES
A METHOD OF LOAD INCREMENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SECOND-ORDER LIMIT LOAD AND COLLAPSE SAFETY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED STRUCTURES Konuralp Girgin (Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Science and Technology,
More informationA Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings
Fawad A. Najam Pennung Warnitchai Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand Email: fawad.ahmed.najam@ait.ac.th A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic
More informationSeismic performance of buildings resting on sloping ground A review
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-issn: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 11, Issue 3 Ver. III (May- Jun. 2014), PP 12-19 Seismic performance of buildings resting on sloping
More information3D PUSHOVER ANALYSIS: THE ISSUE OF TORSION
Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved 12 th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering Paper Reference 015 (quote when citing this paper) 3D PUSHOVER ANALYSIS: THE ISSUE OF TORSION
More informationSEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS
3 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, 4 Paper No. 377 SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS Ramiro VARGAS and Michel BRUNEAU
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationINELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION
INEASTIC SEISMIC DISPACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVAENT INEARIZATION M. S. Günay 1 and H. Sucuoğlu 1 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University,
More informationEarthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept
Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum
More informationCAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 24 Paper No. 2367 CAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM M.UMA MAHESHWARI 1 and A.R.SANTHAKUMAR 2 SUMMARY
More information1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29
1. Background In close collaboration with local partners, Earthquake Damage Analysis Center (EDAC) of Bauhaus Universität Weimar initiated a Turkish German joint research project on Seismic Risk Assessment
More informationLecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationNONLINEAR SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE (SSI) ANALYSIS USING AN EFFICIENT COMPLEX FREQUENCY APPROACH
NONLINEAR SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE (SSI) ANALYSIS USING AN EFFICIENT COMPLEX FREQUENCY APPROACH Dan M. GHIOCEL 1 ABSTRACT The paper introduces a novel approach for modeling nonlinear hysteretic behavior
More informationLecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)
Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake
More informationInelastic shear response of RC coupled structural walls
Inelastic shear response of RC coupled structural walls E. Morariu EDIT Structural, Bucuresti, Rumania. T. Isakovic, N. Eser & M. Fischinger Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana,
More informationROSESCHOOL ANALYSIS OF CODE PROCEDURES FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: ITALIAN SEISMIC CODE, EC8, ATC-40, FEMA356, FEMA440
EUROPEAN SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED STUDIES IN REDUCTION OF SEISMIC RISK ROSESCHOOL ANALYSIS OF CODE PROCEDURES FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: ITALIAN SEISMIC CODE, EC8, ATC-40, FEMA356, FEMA440
More informationSEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES Cem Topkaya Professor of Civil Engineering Middle East Technical University Ankara, Turkey e-mail: ctopkaya@metu.edu.tr Ahmet Kuşyılmaz
More informationNonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER
Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER Adrian DOGARIU European Erasmus Mundus Master Course Sustainable Constructions under Natural Hazards and Catastrophic Events 520121-1-2011-1-CZ-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC Structural
More informationApplication of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames
Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Kawai, N. 1 ABSTRACT Relating to the revision of Building Standard Law of Japan, the application
More informationComparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient
33, Issue (27) 5-23 Journal of Advanced Research in Materials Science Journal homepage: www.akademiabaru.com/arms.html ISSN: 2289-7992 Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed
More informationComparison between Different Shapes of Structure by Response Spectrum Method of Dynamic Analysis
Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 6, 131-138 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojce http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.62012 Comparison between Different Shapes
More informationThe effects of the accidental torsional eccentricity on the seismic behaviour of building structures
The effects of the accidental torsional eccentricity on the seismic behaviour of building structures João Miguel Parece Pereira Raposo October 2014 Civil Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico,
More informationSTATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD
STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706 Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD 1 By the end of today s course You will be able to answer: What are NSA advantages over other structural
More informationSEISMIC PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS BASED ON THE CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD
SEISMIC PERFORMACE ESTIMATIO OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDIGS BASED O THE CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD Tatsuya AZUHATA, Taiki SAITO, Masaharu TAKAYAMA And Katsumi AGAHARA 4 SUMMARY This paper presents the procedure
More informationRESPONSE ANALYSIS STUDY OF A BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING BASED
4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering Taipei, Taiwan October 12-13, 2006 Paper No. 224 RESPONSE ANALYSIS STUDY OF A BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING BASED ON SEISMIC CODES WORLDWIDE Demin Feng 1,
More informationA Nonlinear Static (Pushover) Procedure Consistent with New Zealand Standards
A Nonlinear Static (Pushover) Procedure Consistent with New Zealand Standards B. J. Davidson Compusoft Engineering Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand. 010 NZSEE Conference ABSTRACT: The Nonlinear Static Procedure,
More informationSEISMIC RELIABILITY FUNCTIONS OF MULTISTORY BUILDINGS THEIR SENSITIVITY TO SEVERAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN VARIABLES
October 12-17, 28, Beijing, China SEISMIC RELIABILITY FUNCTIONS OF MULTISTORY BUILDINGS THEIR SENSITIVITY TO SEVERAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN VARIABLES ABSTRACT : O. Díaz-López 1, E. Ismael-Hernández 2 and
More informationA Comparison of Saudi Building Code with 1997 UBC for Provisions of Modal Response Spectrum Analysis Using a Real Building
Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 2017, 6, 98-116 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojer ISSN Online: 2169-9631 ISSN Print: 2169-9623 A Comparison of Saudi Building Code with 1997 UBC for Provisions of Modal
More informationVERIFYING THE LOCATION OF THE OPTIMUM TORSION AXIS OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS USING DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 004 Paper No. 833 VERIFYING THE LOCATION OF THE OPTIMUM TORSION AXIS OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS USING DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
More informationChapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 5.1 GENERAL The equivalent lateral force (ELF) procedure specified in Sec. 5.2 is similar in its basic concept to SEAOC recommendations in 1968, 1973,
More informationESTIMATING PARK-ANG DAMAGE INDEX USING EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS
ESTIMATING PARK-ANG DAMAGE INDEX USING EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS Debarati Datta 1 and Siddhartha Ghosh 2 1 Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India 2 Assistant
More informationDEPENDENCE OF ACCIDENTAL TORSION ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROPERTIES
th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, 4 Paper No. 6 DEPENDENCE OF ACCIDENTAL TORSION ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROPERTIES Julio J. HERNÁNDEZ and Oscar A. LÓPEZ SUMMARY
More informationSTUDY ON MASS IRREGULARITY OF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS
STUDY ON MASS IRREGULARITY OF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS Darshan D 1, Shruthi H K 2, 1MTech student, dept of civil Engineering, EWIT, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 2Asst professor, dept of civil Engineering, EWIT,
More informationA q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e
A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000
More informationDesign of Earthquake-Resistant Structures
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures Basic principles Ioannis N. Psycharis Basic considerations Design earthquake: small
More informationComparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe
Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 66-69 (202) pp 2345-2352 Online available since 202/May/4 at www.scientific.net (202) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:0.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.66-69.2345
More informationCodal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002
Abstract Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 00 Paresh V. Patel Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Nirma Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad 38481 In this article codal provisions of IS 1893
More informationSeismic Vulnerability Assessment of Wood-frame Buildings in Southwestern British Columbia
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Wood-frame Buildings in Southwestern British Columbia K. Goda University of Bristol, United Kingdom G.M. Atkinson University of Western Ontario, Canada ABSTRACT: The
More informationPushover Seismic Analysis of Bridge Structures
Pushover Seismic Analysis of Bridge Structures Bernardo Frère Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Arquitectura e Georrecursos, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal October
More informationPerformance based Engineering
Probability based based Methods in Performance based Engineering Fatemeh Jalayer University of Naples Federico II A RELAXED WORKSHOP ON PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING July 2-4 2009 The characterization
More informationSECANT MODES SUPERPOSITION: A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMES
The 4 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October -7, 008, Beijing, China SECANT ODES SUPERPOSITION: A SIPLIFIED ETHOD FOR SEISIC ASSESSENT OF RC FRAES S. Peloso and A. Pavese Post-doc Researcher,
More informationTHE EFFFCT OF TORSIONAL OSCILLATIONS ON EARTHQUAKE STRESSES
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Vol. 48, pp. 221-229. July 1958 THE EFFFCT OF TORSIONAL OSCILLATIONS ON EARTHQUAKE STRESSES By GEORGE W. HOUSNER and HANNU OUTINEN ABSTRACT A comparison
More information[Hussain, 4(9): September 2017] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor
GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND RESEARCHES SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI STOREYED BUILDING WITH SOFT STOREY Mohammed Irfan Hussain* *Asst. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Chaitanya Institute
More information5.4.3 Centre of stiffness and elastic displacements of the diaphragm
5.4.3 Centre of stiffness and elastic displacements of the diaphragm The current paragraph examines the special case of orthogonal columns in parallel arrangement. The general case is examined in Appendix
More informationNonlinear numerical simulation of RC frame-shear wall system
Nonlinear numerical simulation of RC frame-shear wall system Gang Li 1), Feng Zhang 2), Yu Zhang 3) The Faculty Of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China 116023 1) gli@dlut.edu.cn
More informationUluslararası Çelik ve Alüminyum Yapılar Konferansında (ICSAS 07) Temmuz 2007 de İngiltere nin Oxford kentinde sunulmuştur
Uluslararası Çelik ve Alüminyum Yapılar Konferansında (ICSAS 07) Temmuz 2007 de İngiltere nin Oxford kentinde sunulmuştur FUNDAMENTAL PERIODS OF ECCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES WITH SHEAR LINKS by Nuri
More informationDETERMINATION OF PERFORMANCE POINT IN CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD
ISSN (Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization, Volume 2, Special Issue
More informationInfluence of First Shape Factor in Behaviour of Rubber Bearings Base Isolated Buildings.
ISSN (Online) 2347-327 Influence of First Shape Factor in Behaviour of Rubber Bearings Base Isolated Buildings. Luan MURTAJ 1, Enkelejda MURTAJ 1 Pedagogue, Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of
More informationDynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading
Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading Paleti Teja M.Tech (Structural Engineering) Department of Civil Engineering Jogaiah Institute of Technology & Sciences College of Engineering Kalagampudi,
More informationSOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION, WAVE PASSAGE EFFECTS AND ASSYMETRY IN NONLINEAR SOIL RESPONSE
SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION, WAVE PASSAGE EFFECTS AND ASSYMETRY IN NONLINEAR SOIL RESPONSE Mihailo D. Trifunac Civil Eng. Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA E-mail: trifunac@usc.edu
More informationComparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings
Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings Dj. Ladjinovic, A. Raseta, A. Radujkovic & R. Folic University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad,
More informationA STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
A SUDY ON IMPROVEMEN OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS Pu YANG And Yayong WANG SUMMARY he static pushover analysis, POA, is becoming popular as a simplified computer method for seismic performance evaluation of structures.
More informationSeismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses
Seismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses Mehani Youcef (&), Kibboua Abderrahmane, and Chikh Benazouz National Earthquake Engineering Research Center (CGS), Algiers,
More informationANALYSIS OF CRITERION FOR TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY OF SEISMIC STRUCTURES
3 th World Confence on Earthquake Engineing Vancouv, B.C., Canada August -6, 2004 Pap No. 465 ANALYSIS OF CRITERION FOR TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY OF SEISMIC STRUCTURES Nina ZHENG Zhihong YANG 2 Cheng SHI
More informationHand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane
Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane Luan MURTAJ 1, Enkelejda MURTAJ 1 Pedagogue, Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering
More informationPEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2
PEER/SSC Tall Building Design Case study #2 Typical Plan View at Ground Floor and Below Typical Plan View at 2 nd Floor and Above Code Design Code Design Shear Wall properties Shear wall thickness and
More informationVertical acceleration and torsional effects on the dynamic stability and design of C-bent columns
Vertical acceleration and torsional effects on the dynamic stability and design of C-bent columns A. Chen, J.O.C. Lo, C-L. Lee, G.A. MacRae & T.Z. Yeow Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury,
More informationHIERARCHY OF DIFFICULTY CONCEPT: COMPARISON BETWEEN LINEAR AND NON LINEAR ANALYSES ACCORDING TO EC8
HIERARCHY OF DIFFICULTY CONCEPT: COMPARISON BETWEEN LINEAR AND NON LINEAR ANALYSES ACCORDING TO EC8 Gennaro Magliulo 1, Giuseppe Maddaloni 2, Edoardo Cosenza 3 1 Assistant Professor, University of Naples
More informationLecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. Introduction
Introduction In this class we will focus on the structural analysis of framed structures. We will learn about the flexibility method first, and then learn how to use the primary analytical tools associated
More informationINCLUSION OF P EFFECT IN THE ESTIMATION OF HYSTERETIC ENERGY DEMAND BASED ON MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, Paper No. 511, Vol. 47, No. 2-4, June-Dec. 2010, pp. 75 86 INCLUSION OF EFFECT IN THE ESTIMATION OF HYSTERETIC ENERGY DEMAND BASED ON MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS Amarnath
More informationQUALITATIVE COMPARISON OF STATIC PUSHOVER VERSUS INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS CAPACITY CURVES
QUALITATIVE COMPARISON OF STATIC PUSHOVER VERSUS INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS CAPACITY CURVES Michalis Fragiadakis Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, Cyprus Department
More informationSHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 1918 SHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT
More informationBehavior and Modeling of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns
Behavior and Modeling of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns Kenneth J. Elwood University of British Columbia with contributions from Jose Pincheira, Univ of Wisconsin John Wallace, UCLA Questions? What
More informationSHAKING TABLE TESTING OF SYMMETRIC AND ASYMMETRIC THREE-STOREY STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 1248 SHAKING TABLE TESTING OF SYMMETRIC AND ASYMMETRIC THREE-STOREY STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES T. Trombetti
More informationSeismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8
1 Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8 Ioannis P. GIANNOPOULOS 1 Key words: Pushover analysis, FEMA 356, Eurocode 8, seismic assessment, plastic rotation, limit states
More informationANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS
ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING SRUCURE WIH SEBACK SUBJEC O EARHQUAKE GROUND MOIONS 157 Xiaojun ZHANG 1 And John L MEEK SUMMARY he earthquake response behaviour of unframed highrise buildings with setbacks
More informationDegree of coupling in high-rise mixed shear walls structures
Sādhanā Vol. 37, Part 4, August 2012, pp. 481 492. c Indian Academy of Sciences Degree of coupling in high-rise mixed shear walls structures J C D HOENDERKAMP Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven
More informationA New Methodology in Seismic Torsion Design of Building Structures
A New Methodology in Seismic Torsion Design of Building Structures *Han Seon Lee 1) and Kyung Ran Hwang 2) 1), 2) School of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul,
More informationA. Belejo, R. Bento & C. Bhatt Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal 1.INTRODUCTION
Comparison of different computer programs to predict the seismic performance of SPEAR the SPEAR building building by means of by means of Pushover Analysis A. Belejo, R. Bento & C. Bhatt Instituto Superior
More informationEffect of eccentric moments on seismic ratcheting of single-degree-of-freedom structures
Effect of eccentric moments on seismic ratcheting of single-degree-of-freedom structures K.Z. Saif, C.-L. Lee, G.A. MacRae & T.Z. Yeow Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
More informationENVELOPES FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE VECTORS IN NONLINEAR STRUCTURES
ENVEOPES FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE VECTORS IN NONINEAR STRUCTURES Charles MENUN And Armen DER KIUREGHIAN SUMMARY In earthquake engineering, the effects of responses acting simultaneously in a structure must
More informationEvaluation of the Seismic Load Level in Korea based on Global Earthquake Records
Proceedings of the Tenth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Pacific 6-8 November 215, Sydney, Australia Evaluation of the Seismic Load Level in Korea based on
More informationSHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS
3 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, 24 Paper No. 354 SHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS In-Kil Choi, Young-Sun
More informationDisplacement ductility demand and strength reduction factors for rocking structures
Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures VI 9 Displacement ductility demand and strength reduction factors for rocking structures M. Trueb, Y. Belmouden & P. Lestuzzi ETHZ-Swiss Federal Institute of
More informationResponse of Elastic and Inelastic Structures with Damping Systems to Near-Field and Soft-Soil Ground Motions
3 Response of Elastic and Inelastic Structures with Damping Systems to Near-Field and Soft-Soil Ground Motions Eleni Pavlou Graduate Student, Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering,
More informationRESIDUAL STORY-DRIFT OF WEAK-BEAM PORTAL FRAME WITH SLIP-TYPE RESTORING FORCE CHARACTERISTICS OF COLUMN-BASE SUBJECTED TO GROUND MOTION
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 24 Paper No. 192 RESIDUAL STORY-DRIFT OF WEAK-BEAM PORTAL FRAME WITH SLIP-TYPE RESTORING FORCE CHARACTERISTICS OF COLUMN-BASE
More informationACCELERATION RESPONSE OF RIGID AND FLEXIBLE NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS IN BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO STRONG GROUND MOTIONS
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering ACCELERATION RESPONSE OF RIGID AND FLEXIBLE NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS IN BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO STRONG GROUND MOTIONS A Thesis
More informationA thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering endorsed in Earthquake Engineering
SEISMIC RATCHETING OF RC COLUMNS WITH ECCENTRIC GRAVITY LOADINGS AND NON-SYMMETRIC LATERAL STIFFNESS AND STRENGTH KHALED ZUHAIR M. SAIF A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
More informationINFLUENCE OF FRICTION PENDULUM SYSTEM ON THE RESPONSE OF BASE ISOLATED STRUCTURES
Octoer 12-17, 28, Beijing, China INFLUENCE OF FRICTION PENDULUM SYSTEM ON THE RESPONSE OF BASE ISOLATED STRUCTURES M. Garevski 1 and M. Jovanovic 2 1 Director, Professor, Institute of Earthquake Engineering
More informationCollapse modes of structures under strong motions of earthquake
ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 45, N. 6, December 2002 Collapse modes of structures under strong motions of earthquake Hiroshi Akiyama Real Estate Science, School of Science and Technology, Nihon University,
More informationCombined Effect of Soil Structure Interaction and Infill Wall Stiffness on Building_- A Review
Combined Effect of Soil Structure Interaction and Infill Wall Stiffness on Building_- A Review Prof. Wakchaure M. R a* a Dean & Asso. Professor, Dept.of Civil Engineering, Amrutvahini College of Engineering,
More informationCOMPARATIVE STUDY OF LINEAR-ELASTIC AND NONLINEAR- INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSES OF FLUID-TANK SYSTEMS
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 1127 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LINEAR-ELASTIC AND NONLINEAR- INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSES OF FLUID-TANK SYSTEMS
More informationLecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings
1 Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings Course Instructor: Dr. Carlos E. Ventura, P.Eng. Department of Civil Engineering The University of British Columbia ventura@civil.ubc.ca Short Course for CSCE
More informationIMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC STRUCTURES TO NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTION
IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC STRUCTURES TO NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTION Wilfred D IWAN 1, Ching-Tung HUANG 2 And Andrew C GUYADER 3 SUMMARY Idealized structural models are employed to reveal
More informationINFLUENCE OF EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY MEASURE ON THE PROBABILISTIC EVALUATION OF RC BUILDINGS
INFLUENCE OF EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY MEASURE ON THE PROBABILISTIC EVALUATION OF RC BUILDINGS ABSTRACT: M. Bianchini, P.P. Diotallevi and L. Landi 3 Assistant Lecturer, DISTART, Dept. of Civil Engineering,
More informationChord rotation demand for Effective Catenary Action under Monotonic. Loadings
ICCM015, 14-17 th July, Auckland, NZ Chord rotation demand for Effective Catenary Action under Monotonic Loadings *Meng-Hao Tsai Department of Civil Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science
More informationNonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridges under Earthquakes
6 th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering 11 th International Workshop on Advanced Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology August 1-2, 2015, University of
More informationΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B
Volume B 3.1.4 Diaphragmatic behaviour In general, when there is eccentric loading at a floor, e.g. imposed by the horizontal seismic action, the in-plane rigidity of the slab forces all the in-plane points
More informationStructural behavior of a high-rise RC structure under vertical earthquake motion
Structural behavior of a high-rise RC structure under vertical earthquake motion Selcuk Bas 1), Ilker Kalkan 2) and *Jong-Han Lee 3) 1) Department of Civil Engineering, Bartin University, 74100 Central,
More informationChapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures
Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings
More informationEffects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device
Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device A. Krishnamoorthy Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Manipal
More informationSEISMIC RESPONSE OF BUILDINGS WITH NON-UNIFORM STIFFNESS MODELED AS CANTILEVERED SHEAR BEAMS
10NCEE Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 1-5, 014 Anchorage, Alaska SEISMIC RESPONSE OF BUILDINGS WITH NON-UNIFORM STIFFNESS MODELED AS CANTILEVERED
More informationENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC
ENERGY DIAGRAM ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS INELASTIC WORK DONE HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION DUCTILITY
More informationSimplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E.
Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure Gordon Wray, P.E. SEAONC Protective Systems Subcommittee Objectives > Current Unique Code Requirements More sophisticated engineering analysis Geotechnical need
More informationSeismic resistance of a reinforced concrete building before and after retrofitting Part II: The retrofitted building
Seismic resistance of a reinforced concrete building before and after retrofitting Part II: The retrofitted building M. Marletta, S. Vaccaro & I. Caliò Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More information