Washington State K 12 Facilities Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Final Mitigation Plan

Transcription

1 Washington State K 12 Facilities Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Final Mitigation Plan ESD Meeting, January 2015 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction School Facilities & Organization 1

2 Mitigating 2

3 3

4 Washington s Planning Approach Award: FEMA $1 Million Grant Duration: Fall Involvement: The planning process involves a wide array of stakeholders End Goal: Assist school districts in developing mitigation plans 4

5 Levels of Detail of Work 5

6 Current Project Status Tasks Completed 5 stakeholder planning team meetings Expanded ICOS database for facility information relevant to hazards Collection of facility information for 28 pilot districts Developed planning toolkit Finalized K-12 Mitigation Plan Actively coordinating with planning partners 6

7 7

8 Washington State K 12 Facilities Mitigation Plan: Mission Statement Proactively facilitate and support statewide resources and programs that assist school districts in making K 12 schools in Washington State more disaster resistant and disaster resilient. Developed by stakeholder planning team 8

9 Components of the Washington State K 12 Facilities Hazard Mitigation Plan Summary of public involvement process Assessment of natural hazard risks Goals, objectives, and action items that address the natural hazard risks Implementation plan 9

10 Public Involvement Process Public survey 250+ respondents Five stakeholder planning team meetings held Public comment period 3 months for online submissions at the OSPI website 10

11 Risk Assessment Analyzes six major natural hazards in depth Identifies all K 12 facilities which are in harms way of a given hazard Provides a better understanding of the extent of the damage to K 12 facilities 11

12 Earthquake Ground Motions with a 2% Chance of Being Exceeded in 50 Years Peak Ground Acceleration (% g) Number of Campuses Percent of Campuses Percent of Campuses This Level or Higher 70% to 74% % 1.07% 60% to 70% % 11.21% 50% to 60% % 48.85% 40% to 50% % 68.01% 30% to 40% % 73.62% 25% to 30% % 80.75% 20% to 25% % 89.61% 15% to 20% % 99.63% Less Than15% % % Totals % N/A DRAFT 12

13 Mt. Rainier 13

14 Seismic Loss Estimates for K 12 Schools Scenario Earthquake Total Damage and Losses Total Casualties and Injuries Cascadia Subduction Zone: Interface M9.0 $4,088,461,779 3,227 Cascadia Subduction Zone: Interface M7.2 $1,162,741, Chelan Fault Zone M7.2 $133,797, Cle Elum Seismic Zone M6.8 $77,248, Hite Fault Zone M6.8 $95,481, Latah Fault Zone M5.5 $71,867, Mill Creek Fault Zone M7.0 $124,953, Seattle Fault System M7.2 $5,438,147,217 5,414 Southern Whidbey Island Fault System M7.4 $3,192,001,908 3,073 14

15 Goals Goal 1: Protect Life Safety Goal 2: Protect K 12 School Facilities Goal 3: Enhance Emergency Planning, Disaster Response, and Post-Disaster Recovery Goal 4: Encourage and Facilitate Development of Hazard Mitigation Plans for School Districts 15

16 Planning Partner To Do List Enter district PDM building information into ICOS Develop planning team Populate templates School district information (Chapter 2) Hazard information (ICOS reports) Identify goals and objectives Public Input 16

17 Data Analysis Reports ICOS Database Facility (Populated by school district) Hazard (Prepopulated by OSPI) No district staff time required 17

18 ICOS Hazard Reports Steilacoom Hist Building Anderson Island Elementary School Earthquake Tsunami Volcanic Flood WUI Assessment Not Compl eted None** None** STATE OF WASHINGTON SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DISTRICT PDM TOTAL RISK SUMMARY Assessment Not Compl eted None** Modera te None** None** Very Low Modera te Landslide None** None** Cherryda l e El ementary School Hi gh None** None** Very Low None** None** Chl oe Cl a rk El ementary School Low None** None** Very Low None** None** Pi oneer Mi ddl e School Low None** None** Very Low None** None** Sa l tars Poi nt El ementary School Low None** None** Very Low Modera te None** Steilacoom High School Moderate to High None** None** Very Low None** High 18

19 Template Example 19

20 Typical Mitigation Plan Outline Overview and Context Chapter 1: Introduction Few pieces of information needed Chapter 2: District Profile District needs to provide local information (e.g. enrollment, maps, mission statement, etc.) Chapter 3: Planning Process To be added to throughout planning process Chapter 4: Mission Statement, Goals, Objectives and Action Items Ideally based on planning team (select from menu) Chapter 5: Plan Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Few pieces of information needed

21 Typical Mitigation Plan Outline Hazards Chapter 6: Earthquakes Chapter 7: Floods Chapter 8: Tsunamis Chapter 9: Wildland/Urban Interface Fires Chapter 10: Volcanic Hazards Chapter 11: Landslides Chapter 12: Other Hazards Appendices Only need Chapters that district the has a risk for (see ICOS risk summary report)

22 What good is a report and plan? Federal Funds Specific identifiable projects that meet the highest need to protect life safety SAFER SCHOOL CHILDREN Identify facilities in need of evacuation routes 22

23 Planning Toolkit Pilot Process Completion: Spring 2015 First district plan completed October 2014 Toolkit District Distribution: Expected Late 2015/Early

24 Thank You 24