Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata Documentation The Nature Conservancy of Nevada December 2007

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata Documentation The Nature Conservancy of Nevada December 2007"

Transcription

1 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata Documentation The Nature Conservancy of Nevada December 2007 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 1/134

2 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata Documentation The Nature Conservancy of Nevada December 2007 Contained within this document are detailed notes regarding GIS work for the Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project. Work includes (a) preparation or manipulation of various GIS datasets, (b) acquisition of LANDFIRE National and Rapid Assessment data, (c) use of the FRCC Mapping Tool and other LANDFIRE software to generate FRCC data, and (c) comparison of FRCC and BpS datasets between LOCAL and LANDFIRE data. Location of data, metadata and other files for this (and related) project on TNC-NV s GIS drive (K:): K:\GIS1\landfire Specifically K:\GIS1\landfire\data K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\NationalData K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\RapidAssessment_Sept2006 K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\test K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap K:\GIS1\landfire\gis_tools K:\GIS1\landfire\maps K:\GIS1\landfire\metadata K:\GIS1\landfire\projects K:\GIS1\landfire\reports K:\GIS1\landfire\training - non-spatial data: refcon tables, cross-walks - GIS data - DVD data of LANDFIRE National Data - CD data of LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment - LANDFIRE data for this App Project - preliminary data for this App Project - LANDFIRE/local data for this App Project - various software tools - PDF maps - documentation - Arc projects - completed product: this document - training documents, exercises; notes Note: Throughout this document, various GIS datasets are described visually through maps; tabularly through Value Attribute Tables (VATs) or Excel spreadsheets; or, textually through properties descriptions. Appendix 3 contains much of this information. Note: This document is a Microsoft Word file. Since created as a Word file, various sections (maps, in particular) are clipboard insertions into the document. In some instances (maps, in particular), the visual/print quality is reduced relative to the original source because of this. Task I: Preparation of key GIS datasets. Methods: Use ESRI s ArcInfo 9.0 Workstation and ArcView ArcMap 9.1. I.1. The local data to compare against the LANDFIRE data are in the UTM Zone 11 NAD27 coordinate system. In order to download the LANDFIRE data (which are Albers NAD83), the raster grid for the project boundary needs to be reprojected (whole project boundary and west-east basins boundary). To accomplish this, a series of data manipulations were performed: a. Copy the 2 grids to keep the originals intact. b. Make the background NoData. c. Resample the 2 grids from 10 meters to 30 m. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 2/134

3 I.1.A. The whole project boundary (WASSUK) and the 2-basins (west-east) boundary (BASINS) were copied using ArcInfo 9.0 Workstation: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\local\FRCC\ WASSUK - whole Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project boundary BASINS - east and west basins for the project boundary Usage: COPY <from_geo_dataset> {to_geo_dataset} {DEFAULT SINGLE DOUBLE} Arc: copy wassuk wassuk2 Arc: copy basins basins2 Descriptions of the 2 original raster grids: WASSUK.VAT Value Count Notes Background Project Area BASINS.VAT Value Count Class_name Basins Notes Background Background Basin - West WEST Project Area Basin - East EAST Project Area Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 3/134

4 Note: There are some weird raster cell slivers in at least 2 south-central portions on the edges of both WASSUK and BASINS. Some of these slivers disappear in WASSUK2 and BASINS2 (after the resampling, etc). Note: There are cell changes that occur in the raster grids as the datasets are manipulated (e.g., resampling, reprojecting). I.1.B. Using ArcMap 9.1, the background raster cells were disappeared. WASSUK and BASINS had Value = 0 for the background (the non-project area). In WASSUK2 and BASINS2, the background in each was converted to NoData using the Reclassify tool (ArcToolbox Spatial Analyst Tools Reclass Reclassify). Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 4/134

5 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 5/134

6 Note: At each step, the resulting grid was renamed WASSUK2 or BASINS2 and the intermediary grid was deleted using Arc:rename and Arc:kill. I.1. C. The original landscape level boundaries, WASSUK and BASINS, are raster grids with a cell size 10m. In order to make WASSUK2 and BASINS2 the same 30m cell size of LANDFIRE data, these grids were resampled using ArcMap s Resample tool (ArcToolbox Data Management Tools Raster Resample). Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 6/134

7 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 7/134

8 Note: At each step, the resulting grid was renamed WASSUK2 or BASINS2 and the intermediary grid was deleted. The final WASSUK2 and BASINS2 project boundaries in UTM Zone 11 NAD27 are described here: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\local\FRCC WASSUK2 BASINS2 WASSUK2.VAT Value Count BASINS2.VAT Value Count Notes West East In a 30 meter raster grid, each cell is 900 m 2 or acres. Acres = (Area in square meters / 10,000) * To determine size of the Wassuk Range project area, Acres = Count * Wassuk Range project area = 346, acres West basins area = 192, acres East basins area = 153, I.2. Reproject the 2 project boundary (landscape level) grids from UTM 11 NAD27 to Albers NAD83. I.2.A. A two-step reprojection was performed: WASSUK2 and BASINS2 were reprojected first from UTM 11 NAD27 to UTM 11 NAD83 and second from UTM11NAD83 to Albers NAD83 (USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic USGS.prj) using ArcMap s Project Raster tool (ArcToolbox Data Management Tools Projections and Transformations Raster Project Raster). (The intermediary data was deleted.) Resultant datasets: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap WASSUK2 BASINS2 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 8/134

9 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 9/134

10 I.2.B. Note: After the reprojection, the WASSUK2 and BASINS2 landscape level grids each had a cell size of meters rather than 30 meters. To deal with this, the two grids were resampled to 30 meters using ArcMap s Resample tool (ArcToolbox Data Management Tools Raster Resample). Resultant datasets final for use as landscape level grids (in the Albers NAD83 coordinate system): K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap WASSUK2B BASINS2B Dataset descriptions are below. Note the difference in cell count between these reprojected grids and their originals. Note the overall shape difference (project boundary) between the two coordinate systems. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 10/134

11 WASSUK2B.VAT Value Count BASINS2B.VAT Value Count Notes West East Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 11/134

12 Task II: Acquire LANDFIRE National Data and LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment data. Methods: Use the LANDFIRE Data Access Tool. From ArcMap 9.1, LANDFIRE National and LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment BPS and SCLASS data were downloaded using the LANDFIRE Data Access Tool (LDAT) The WASSUK2B project boundary (in Albers NAD83) was used as the reference boundary for the data download. The Wassuk Range NV Application Project lies entirely within LANDFIRE Map Zone 12 - Western Great Basin. II.1. Data downloaded 21 August 2007 [most up-to-date?] and assembled using the LDAT: LANDFIRE National Data K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 12/134

13 LANDFIRE National Data: Biophysical Settings (Bps) and Succession Classes (SClass) Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 13/134

14 LANDFIRE National Data: Biophysical Settings (Bps) and Succession Classes (SClass) Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 14/134

15 LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment: Biophysical Settings (PNVG) and Succession Classes (SClass) Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 15/134

16 LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment: Biophysical Settings (PNVG) and Succession Classes (SClass) Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 16/134

17 LANDFIRE BpS and SClass datasets: LANDFIRE National Data K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd BPS_1 (+ BPS_1_attribs.csv) SCLASS_1 (+ SCLASS_1_attribs.csv) LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra RA_PNVG_1 (+ RA_PNVG_1_attribs.csv) RA_SCLS_1 (+ RA_SCLS_1_attribs.csv) Note: Despite attempts otherwise, data downloaded included portions of Map Zone 6 (to the west of the project). II.2. Prepare GIS datasets for use in the FRCC Mapping Tool. II.2.A. Though it is not necessary to clip the BPS and SCLASS layers to the landscape level (WASSUK2B) for use in the FRCC MT, to simplify matters (especially given that the downloads included Map Zone 12 as well as an extraneous bit of Map Zone 6), the datasets were clipped to the project boundary. Using the Spatial Analyst Raster Calculator, each of the BPS and SCLASS datasets for both LANDFIRE National and Rapid Assessment were clipped to the project boundary (analysis mask = WASSUK2B). LANDFIRE National Data Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 17/134

18 Spatial Analyst Options Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 18/134

19 LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment data II.2.B. Because the clipping process removes most of the attribute information associated with the raster grids (everything but the Value and Count fields (and the ObjectID field)), the LANDFIRE Join Attributes tool was used to restore their attributes. The LANDFIRE Join Attributes Tool was used to add back the attribute information to the BPS and SCLASS data layers (for National and Rapid Assessment). The process creates a new grid (renamed *2 for all datasets using Arc:rename). These data layers are the ones to use with the FRCC Mapping Tool. II.2.C. Resultant Datasets: LANDFIRE BPS and SCLASS data (with attributes) clipped to the project boundary (WASSUK2B): LANDFIRE National Data K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd BPS_WR2 SCLASS_WR2 LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra RAPNVG_WR2 RASCLS_WR2 Descriptions of the datasets follow: Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 19/134

20 LANDFIRE National Data Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 20/134

21 BPS_WR2.VAT Value Count Bps_code Bps_model Bps_name Open Water Barren-Rock/Sand/Clay Inter-Mountain Basins Sparsely Vegetated Systems North American Warm Desert Sparsely Vegetated Systems Rocky Mountain Aspen Forest and Woodland Great Basin Pinyon-Juniper Woodland Inter-Mountain Basins Subalpine Limber-Bristlecone Pine Woodland California Montane Jeffrey Pine(-Ponderosa Pine) Woodland Southern Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland Sierra Nevada Subalpine Lodgepole Pine Forest and Woodland Inter-Mountain Basins Curl-leaf Mountain Mahogany Woodland and Shrubland Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Shrubland Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Salt Desert Scrub Mojave Mid-Elevation Mixed Desert Scrub Great Basin Semi-Desert Chaparral Columbia Plateau Low Sagebrush Steppe Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Shrub-Steppe Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Grassland Inter-Mountain Basins Greasewood Flat Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Riparian Systems Rocky Mountain Subalpine/Upper Montane Riparian Systems Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 21/134

22 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 22/134

23 SCLASS_WR2.VAT Value Count Label Descriptio A Succession Class A B Succession Class B C Succession Class C D Succession Class D E Succession Class E UN Uncharacteristic Native Vegetation Cover / Structure / Composition UE Uncharacteristic Exotic Vegetation Water Water Urban Urban Barren Barren Sparsely Vegetated Sparsely Vegetated Agriculture Agriculture Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 23/134

24 LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 24/134

25 RAPNVG_WR2.VAT Value Count Pnvg Pnvg_name Code Display R1ALME Grassland Alpine Meadows Barrens R1PICOcw Forested Sierra Nevada Lodgepole Pine - Cold Wet Upper Montane R1PICOdy Forested Sierra Nevada Lodgepole Pine - Dry Subalpine R2ASMClw Forested Aspen with Conifer--Low to Mid-Elevations R2CHAPmn Shrubland Montane Chaparral R2CRBU Shrubland Creosotebush Shrublands With Grasses R2MGCOws Grassland Mountain Meadow---Mesic to Dry R2MSHBwt Shrubland Mountain Shrubland with Trees R2MTMA Shrubland Curlleaf Mountain Mahogany R2PIJU Woodland Juniper and Pinyon Juniper Steppe Woodland R2PIPO Forested Interior Ponderosa Pine R2SBBB Shrubland Basin Big Sagebrush R2SBDW Shrubland Black and Low Sagebrushes R2SBDWwt Shrubland Black and Low Sagebrushes with Trees R2SBMT Shrubland Mountain Big Sagebrush R2SBMTwc Shrubland Mountain Big Sagebrush with Conifers R2SBWY Shrubland Wyoming Big Sagebrush Semi-Desert R2SBWYwt Shrubland Wyoming Big Sagebrush Semi Desert with Trees R2SDSH Shrubland Salt Desert Shrub RAWater NonVeg Water Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 25/134

26 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 26/134

27 RASCLS_WR2.VAT Value Count Display Sclass_nam Sclass A 01: Sclass A B 02: Sclass B C 03: Sclass C D 04: Sclass D E 05: Sclass E U 06: Sclass U Water 07: Water Bare Rock/Sand/Clay 09: Barren Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands 11: Wetland - Herbaceous Low Intensity Residential 12: Low Intensity Residential Commercial/Industrial/Transportation/Quarries/Strip Mines/Gravel Pits 14: Other Developed Agriculture 15: Agriculture Unclassified - Shrubland 17: Unclassified - Shrubland Unclassified - Grasslands/Herbaceous 18: Unclassified - Herbaceous 18 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 27/134

28 Task III: Use the FRCC Mapping Tool to generate fire regime condition class (FRCC) for the Wassuk Range NV Application Project: LANDFIRE National Data, LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment data; LOCAL data. Methods: Use the LANDFIRE FRCC Mapping Tool. Task III.1.A. LOCAL data for the Wassuk Range, Nevada. This work was completed by Louis Provencher (The Nature Conservancy) and Jeff Campbell (Spatial Solutions), the principal investigators for the Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project. The GIS work for the local data, including use of the FRCC Mapping Tool (FRCC MT), was completed by Jeff Campbell. Louis and Jeff can speak to the methodologies, science and GIS involved in the effort to develop local, finest-quality (highest-accuracy) data for BPS, SCLASS, and FRCC for the Wassuk Range. Datasets: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\local\FRCC BASINS BASINS2 WASSUK WASSUK2 BPS SERALU SERALNOU OUT1 OUT2 OUT3 OUT4 - FRCC output: west and east basins (no uncharacteristic) - FRCC output: west and east basins (includes uncharacteristic) - FRCC output: whole project area (no uncharacteristic) - FRCC output: whole project area (includes uncharacteristic) Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 28/134

29 LOCAL Data Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 29/134

30 BPS.VAT Value Count Class_name Bps Background Water Barren/Sparsely Vegetated Roads/Developed Agriculture RM Aspen Forest/Wdld wr GB Pinyon/Juniper Wdld - Dry wr1019d GB Pinyon/Juniper Wdld - Mst wr1019m Limber/Bristlecone Pine wr IMB Mt. Mahogany Wdld/Shr wr IMB Big Sagebrush - Dry wr1080d IMB Big Sagebrush - Mst wr1080m IMB Big Sagebrush - LECI4 wr1080bw MIB Mixed Salt Desert Scrub wr GB Xeric Mixed Sage - ARAR wr1079aa CP Low Sagebrush Steppe-Wsk Rng wr IMB Montane Sagebrush Steppe wr IMB Mixed Semi-Desert Shrub Step wr IMB Greasewood Flat wr IMB Juniper Savanna wr IMB Semi-Desert Grassland wr RM Alpine Montane - Wet Meadow wr1145wm IMB Montane Riparian Systems wr RM SubAlpine/Upper Mont Riparian wr1160 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 30/134

31 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 31/134

32 SERALU.VAT Value Count Class_name Seral Background A a B b C c D d E e A/U u B/U u C/U u D/U u E/U u Water Barren/Sparsely Vegetated Roads/Developed Agriculture Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 32/134

33 LOCAL Data FRCC Results Legend -- FRCC Values: 1 Green; 2 Yellow; 3 Red; 4 Blue Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 33/134

34 FRCC LOCAL Project Area STRATFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 34/134

35 Legend -- FRCC Values: 1 Green; 2 Yellow; 3 Red; 4 Blue Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 35/134

36 FRCC LOCAL East-West Basins STRATFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 36/134

37 Task III.1.B. LANDFIRE National Data Methods: Use the LANDFIRE FRCC Mapping Tool. The LANDFIRE FRCC Mapping Tool was used in concert with ArcMap 9.1 to generate FRCC (Fire Regime Condition Class) data for the Wassuk Range project area and west-east basins areas using National Data (LND). Reference Conditions (a.k.a. historical range of variation for BpS/vegetation) * Used the LFNat_west table in the LFNat_west.mdb database (from LANDFIRE). * Used the FRCC MT to import the LFNat_west table into the REFCON.MDB database. * Renamed the LFNat_west table to the LFNAT_wr table. * Deleted all but Map Zone 12 records from the LFNAT_wr table in the REFCON.MDB. * Set LandscapeLevel = 1 for all records. * For this project, the default FRG (Fire Regime Group) values in REFCON.MDB-LFNAT_WR are used. LFNAT_WR table in the REFCON.MDB used in FRCC MT for project and basins runs with LND. BpS_Model BpS_Name A B C D E U FRG LandscapeLevel Rocky Mountain Aspen Forest and Woodland I Columbia Plateau Western Juniper Woodland and Savanna III Great Basin Pinyon-Juniper Woodland III Inter-Mountain Subalpine Limber-Bristlecone Pine Woodland III Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland I Mediterranean California Mixed Oak Woodland I Mediterranean California Ponderosa-Jeffrey Pine Forest and Woodland I Mediteranean California Subalpine Woodland III Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland I Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodlands I Rocky Mountain Subalpine Limber-Bristlecone Pine Woodland III Sierra Nevada Subalpine Lodgepole Pine Forest and Woodland III Inter-Mountain Basins Aspen-Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland I Inter-Mountain Basins Mountain Mahogany Woodland and Shrubland III Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland III Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Shrubland IV Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Salt Desert Scrub V Mojave Mid-Elevation Desert Scrub V Sonora-Mojave Creosotebush-White Bursage Desert Scrub V Sonora-Mojave Mixed Salt Desert Scrub NA Great Basin Semi-Desert Chaparral IV Mogollon Semi-Desert Chaparral IV Columbia Plateau Low Sagebrush Steppe III Inter-Mountain Basin Big Sagebrush Steppe IV Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe IV Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Semi-Desert Shrub Steppe V Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Grassland IV Rocky Mountain Dry Tundra V Rocky Mountain Subalpine Mesic Meadow II Southern Rocky Mountain Montane- Subalpine Grassland I Inter-Mountain Basins Greasewood Flat V Intermountain Basins Montane Riparian Systems V Rocky Mountain Lower Montane Riparian Systems V Rocky Mountain Subalpine/Upper Montane Riparian Systems III 1 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 37/134

38 * The LND SClass data contain 2 Uncharacteristic classes (UN and UE). These need to be combined into a single U class in order to run the FRCC Mapping Tool. The UN and UE classes were combined into one category using the LANDFIRE/NIFTT FLSC Tool The UN and UE classes in SCLASS_WR2 were combined and the resultant grid (renamed SCLASS_WR2_M to SCLASS_WR3) contains only 1 U class (and no longer contains any classes other than A,B,C,D,E,U). Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 38/134

39 FRCC MT Project Area LND * The WASSUK_LAP_AN83_LND_FRCC_PROJECT.MXD ArcMap project was copied to WRLNDFWR.MXD (10 character rule for length of project name). * Data are in Albers NAD83. * Input Datasets: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\ WASSUK2B K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd\ BPS_WR2 SCLASS_WR3 * Run the FRCC Mapping Tool. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 39/134

40 Output: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd\frcc\wassuk\ STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc * The FRCC MT generated a clean raster (grid name: *_C) for BpS which was then used by the MT to create the FRCC data. In the BPS_WR2_C grid, cells with BpS types which do not match the BpS types in the refcon table are removed. K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd\frcc\wassuk\CleanRasters BPS_WR2_C Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 40/134

41 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 41/134

42 FRCC MT Basins LND * The WASSUK_LAP_AN83_LND_FRCC_BASINS.MXD ArcMap project was copied to WRLNDBAS.MXD. * Data are in Albers NAD83. * Input datasets: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\ BASINS2B K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd\ BPS_WR2 SCLASS_WR3 * Run the FRCC Mapping Tool. * Got the same BpS warning message as in the whole project run. Output: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd\frcc\basins STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 42/134

43 * The FRCC MT generated a clean raster (grid name: *_C) for BpS which was then used by the MT to create the FRCC data. In the BPS_WR2_C grid, cells with BpS types which do not match the BpS types in the refcon table are removed. K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd\frcc\basins\CleanRasters BPS_WR2_C Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 43/134

44 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 44/134

45 Task III.1.C. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Methods: Use the LANDFIRE FRCC Mapping Tool. The LANDFIRE FRCC Mapping Tool was used in concert with ArcMap 9.1 to generate FRCC (Fire Regime Condition Class) data for the Wassuk Range project area and the west-east basins areas using Rapid Assessment (RA or LRA) data. Reference Conditions * Within the REFCON.MDB database, copy-pasted the ra_westus table to the raw_wr Table. * Deleted all PNVG records except for what occurs in the Wassuk Range. Note: In the raw_wr table, there is no RAWater category like in the PNVG grid. * Set LandscapeLevel to 1 for all records. * For this project, the default FRG (Fire Regime Group) values in REFCON.MDB-RAW_WR are used. RAW_WR table in the REFCON.MDB used in FRCC MT for project and basins runs with RA data. BpS_Model Name A B C D E U FRG LandscapeLevel R1ALME Alpine Meadows Barrens R1PICOcw Sierra Nevada Lodgepole Pine - Cold Wet Upper Montane R1PICOdy Sierra Nevada Lodgepole Pine - Dry Subalpine R2ASMClw Aspen with Conifer--Low to Mid-Elevations R2CHAPmn Montane Chaparral R2CRBU Creosotebush Shrublands with Grasses R2MGCOws Mountain Meadow---Mesic to Dry R2MSHBwt Mountain Shrubland with Trees R2MTMA Curlleaf Mountain Mahogany R2PIJU Juniper and Pinyon Juniper Steppe Woodland R2PIPO Interior Ponderosa Pine R2SBBB Basin Big Sagebrush R2SBDW Black and Low Sagebrushes R2SBDWwt Black and Low Sagebrushes with Trees R2SBMT Mountain Big Sagebrush R2SBMTwc Mountain Big Sagebrush with Conifers R2SBWY Wyoming Big Sagebrush Semi-Desert R2SBWYwt Wyoming Big Sagebrush Semi Desert with Trees R2SDSH Salt Desert Shrub Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 45/134

46 FRCC MT Project Area LRA * Copied the WASSUK_LAP_AN83_LRA_FRCC_PROJECT.MXD ArcMap project to WRLRAFWR.MXD (10 character rule for length of project name). * Data are in Albers NAD. * Input datasets: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra RAPNVG_WR2 RASCLS_WR2 K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap WASSUK2B * Run the FRCC MT Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 46/134

47 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 47/134

48 Output: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra\frcc\wassuk STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc * The FRCC MT generated clean rasters (grid name: *_C) for PNVG and SClass which were then used by the MT to create the FRCC data. In the RAPNVG_WR2_C grid, cells with BpS (aka PNVG) types which do not match the BpS types in the refcon table are removed. In the RASCLS_WR2_C grid, cells with SClass other than A,B,C,D,E,U are removed. K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra\frcc\wassuk\CleanRasters RAPNVG_WR2_C RASCLS_WR2_C Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 48/134

49 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 49/134

50 FRCC MT Basins LRA * Copied the WASSUK_LAP_AN83_LRA_FRCC_BASINS.MXD ArcMap project to WRLRABAS.MXD. * Data are in Albers NAD83. * Input datasets: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra RAPNVG_WR2 RASCLS_WR2 K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap BASINS2B * Run the FRCC MT Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 50/134

51 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 51/134

52 Output K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra\frcc\basins STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc * The FRCC MT generated clean rasters (grid name: *_C) for PNVG and SClass which were then used by the MT to create the FRCC data. In the RAPNVG_WR2_C grid, cells with BpS (aka PNVG) types which do not match the BpS types in the refcon table are removed. In the RASCLS_WR2_C grid, cells with SClass other than A,B,C,D,E,U are removed. K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra\frcc\basins\CleanRasters RAPNVG_WR2_C RASCLS_WR2_C Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 52/134

53 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 53/134

54 Task IV: Compare LOCAL BpS and FRCC data with (1) LANDFIRE National Data and (2) LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment data. Methods: ESRI ArcMap 9.1 raster tools and ArcInfo 9.0. The Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project is, fundamentally, a data comparison (or accuracy assessment) between (1) the LOCAL vegetation (or biophysical setting - BpS) and fire regime condition class (FRCC) data and either (2A) the LANDFIRE National or (2B) the LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment BpS and FRCC data. The LOCAL data is the same spatial scale/resolution 30 meters as the LANDFIRE data, but the LOCAL data can be considered the most accurate because of the concentrated work involved in developing the project-scale data, especially the ground-truthing field work. Using ArcMap 9.1 and ArcInfo 9.0, (A) the LOCAL and LANDFIRE BpS data are compared, (B) the LOCAL and LANDFIRE FRCC (stratafrcc) data are compared, and (C) for a given BpS, the FRCC (stratafrcc) LOCAL and LANDFIRE data are compared. In order to compare the LOCAL and LANDFIRE data, (1) the raster grids all need to be in the same coordinate system, (2) the raster grids all need to have the same 30-meter cell size, and (3) all FRCC (strata) grids need all cells within the project boundary to be accounted (FRCC values 1,2,3 as well as non-frcc value 4). Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 54/134

55 Ideally, to ensure highly accurate cell-by-cell comparisons among raster grids, all grids will be perfectly aligned (not simply in the same coordinate system). In other words, when stacked on top of one another, every cell representing a real-life point on the planet will exactly correspond to the same cell (and same reference point) in every other grid. The LANDFIRE grids (at least in their native Albers NAD83) should align with one another. The main issue is aligning the LOCAL and LANDFIRE grids (with every raster being in UTM11 NAD27). Close-up examination of random areas of the grids reveals that the rasters are slightly off relative to one another. Whether or not this will in any way affect BpS/FRCC comparisons is not clear. (Additionally, snapping grids into cell alignment presumes it can be determined which cells correspond among grids not something necessarily easy to determine.) However, TNC believes that the cell alignment issue will not significantly impact grid comparisons for these larger-area Application Projects (see Appendix 1). At this time, the LOCAL and LANDFIRE BpS and FRCC grids have not specifically been adjusted in this manner. Example: LOCAL BpS grid (BPS_LND2) versus LND BpS grid (BPSWR2_LOC) in upper-left corner of Wassuk Range project area; data is UTM 11 NAD27 (on left LOCAL is on top; on right LND is on top). Note: In the comparison of LOCAL BpS with LND BpS, the combined grid (BPS_LC_LND) appears to align with the LOCAL grid (which was the first grid chosen for the Combine) and the LND grid is slightly off. Note: When doing data comparisons using ArcMap s Combine tool, for any given geographic point, any NoData cell in any grid in the Combine results in a NoData cell in the output (which will impact cell counts and other things). Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 55/134

56 Task IV.1. Comparison of LOCAL and LANDFIRE BpS data. The biophysical (vegetation) data developed for the Wassuk Range (i.e., LOCAL data) was compared to the LANDFIRE data (both LND and LRA). Using ArcMap raster tools, a comparison was made to determine how well the LOCAL and LANDFIRE BpS data match on a cell-by-cell basis. In order to compare the different BpS data, some kind of cross-walk was needed. Louis Provencher reviewed the local, LANDFIRE National, and LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment BpSs found in the Wassuk Range NV. The following cross-walk tables were developed. All BpS grids were reclassified in order to be compared, and all grids use the Cross-Walk Code for cell Values. LOCAL BpS cross-walked with LANDFIRE National BpS: CrossWalk LANDFIRE National Data Code LOCAL Data BpS_Model BpS_Name BpS Name [11] Open Water 11 Water [31] Barren-Rock/Sand/Clay Barren/Sparsely Vegetated Roads/Developed Agriculture Inter-Mountain Basins Sparsely Vegetated Systems North American Warm Desert Sparsely Vegetated Systems Rocky Mountain Aspen Forest and Woodland 1011 wr1011 RM Aspen Forest/Wdld Great Basin Pinyon-Juniper Woodland 1019 wr1019d GB Pinyon/Juniper Wdld - Dry wr1019m GB Pinyon/Juniper Wdld - Mst Inter-Mountain Basins Subalpine Limber-Bristlecone Pine Woodland 1020 wr1020 Limber/Bristlecone Pine Mediterranean California Ponderosa-Jeffrey Pine Forest and Woodland S Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodlands Sierra Nevada Subalpine Lodgepole Pine Forest and Woodland Inter-Mountain Basins Curl-leaf Mountain Mahogany Woodland & Shrubland 1062 wr1062 IMB Mt. Mahogany Wdld/Shr Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland 1079 wr1079aa GB Xeric Mixed Sage - ARAR Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Shrubland 1080 wr1080d IMB Big Sagebrush - Dry wr1080m IMB Big Sagebrush - Mst wr1080bw IMB Big Sagebrush - LECI Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Salt Desert Scrub 1081 wr1081 IMB Mixed Salt Desert Scrub Mojave Mid-Elevation Mixed Desert Scrub Great Basin Semi-Desert Chaparral Columbia Plateau Low Sagebrush Steppe 1124 wr1124 CP Low Sagebrush Steppe - Wsk Rng Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe 1126 wr1126 IMB Montane Sagebrush Steppe Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Semi-Desert Shrub Steppe 1127 wr1127 IMB Mixed Semi-Desert Shrub Step Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Grassland 1135 wr1135 IMB Semi-Desert Grassland Inter-Mountain Basins Greasewood Flat 1153 wr1153 IMB Greasewood Flat Intermountain Basins Montane Riparian Systems 1154 wr1154 IMB Montane Riparian Systems Rocky Mountain Subalpine/Upper Montane Riparian Systems 1160 wr1160 RM SubAlpine/Upper Mont Riparian wr1115 IMB Juniper Savanna wr1145wm RM Alpine Montane - Wet Meadow Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 56/134

57 LOCAL BpS cross-walked with LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment BpS: LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Cross-Walk Code LOCAL Data BpS_Model Name BpS Name R1ALME Alpine Meadows Barrens R1PICOcw Sierra Nevada Lodgepole Pine - Cold Wet Upper Montane R1PICOdy Sierra Nevada Lodgepole Pine - Dry Subalpine R2ASMClw Aspen with Conifer--Low to Mid-Elevations 1011 wr1011 RM Aspen Forest/Wdld R2CHAPmn Montane Chaparral R2CRBU Creosotebush Shrublands with Grasses R2MGCOws Mountain Meadow---Mesic to Dry 1145 wr1145wm RM Alpine Montane - Wet Meadow R2MSHBwt Mountain Shrubland with Trees 1126 wr1126 IMB Montane Sagebrush Steppe R2MTMA Curlleaf Mountain Mahogany 1062 wr1062 IMB Mt. Mahogany Wdld/Shr R2PIJU Juniper and Pinyon Juniper Steppe Woodland 1019 wr1019d GB Pinyon/Juniper Wdld - Dry wr1019m GB Pinyon/Juniper Wdld - Mst R2PIPO Interior Ponderosa Pine R2SBBB Basin Big Sagebrush wr1080bw IMB Big Sagebrush - LECI4 R2SBDW Black and Low Sagebrushes 1079 wr1079 GB Xeric Mixed Sage R2SBDWwt Black and Low Sagebrushes with Trees 1079 wr1079 GB Xeric Mixed Sage R2SBMT Mountain Big Sagebrush 1126 wr1126 IMB Montane Sagebrush Steppe R2SBMTwc Mountain Big Sagebrush with Conifers 1126 wr1126 IMB Montane Sagebrush Steppe R2SBWY Wyoming Big Sagebrush Semi-Desert wr1080d IMB Big Sagebrush - Dry R2SBWYwt Wyoming Big Sagebrush Semi Desert with Trees wr1080m IMB Big Sagebrush - Mst R2SDSH Salt Desert Shrub 1081 wr1081 IMB Mixed Salt Desert Scrub RAWater Water 11 Water wr1020 Limber/Bristlecone Pine wr1079aa GB Xeric Mixed Sage - ARAR wr1124 CP Low Sagebrush Steppe - Wsk Rng wr1127 IMB Mixed Semi-Desert Shrub Step wr1153 IMB Greasewood Flat wr1115 IMB Juniper Savanna wr1135 IMB Semi-Desert Grassland wr1154 IMB Montane Riparian Systems wr1160 RM SubAlpine/Upper Mont Riparian Barren/Sparsely Vegetated Roads/Developed Agriculture Notes for both cross-walks: 1. All BpS types (as well as non-bps cells like Water) are accounted for in both local and LANDFIRE data. In other words, all cells are categorized as something; none were converted to NoData. 2. The FRCC MT creates clean BpS grids -- these were not used for BpS map comparisons; the original BpS grids were used. 3. The Cross-Walk Code was designed to help distinguish, at a glance, (a) BpSs which are the same/similar between local and LANDFIRE (or at least were assigned a match) characterized by the four-digit BpS_Code (based upon LND codes even for LRA PNVG/BpS). (b) BpSs which are from LANDFIRE but not local data characterized by BpS_Model (map zone 12 followed by the four-digit BpS_Code) (based upon LND Codes even for LRA PNVG/BpS). (c) BpSs which are from local data but not LANDFIRE characterized by 90 (arbitrary code) followed by the four-digit BpS_Code (based on LND BpS codes even for LRA PNVG/BpS). Note: There is the possibility that there are existing LANDIFRE BpS matching local BpS, but they were Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 57/134

58 not represented in the Wassuk Range. (d) One local BpS (1080) is split into three types, and in the LOCAL LRA cross-walk these three types are maintained and use the BpS_Code followed by an extra digit (10800, 10801, 10802). (e) Non-BpSs from both local and LANDFIRE data were given two-digit codes. Two (11 Water; 31 Barren- Rock/Sand/Clay) use LND-based codes. The rest (e.g., 60 Agriculture) are arbitrary. 4. In BpS_Model (example: Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Shrubland), the first two digits represent Map Zone, the next four digits represent BpS_Code, and the last digit is agency status of BpS. In the cross-walks above, the last digit was not used in any of the Cross-Walk Codes. LOCAL Data preparation: * For comparison with LANDFIRE National Data, the local BPS grid was reclassified with the Cross-Walk Code and named BPS_LND. The Reclassify tool in ArcMap 9.1 was utilized (ArcToolbox Spatial Analyst Tools Reclass Reclassify). The Background (Value 0) was made NoData; whatever cells were NoData remain NoData; the rest of the cells conform to the Local LND cross-walk. * For comparison with LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment, the local BPS grid was reclassified with the Cross-Walk Code and named BPS_LRA. The Reclassify tool in ArcMap 9.1 was utilized. The Background (Value 0) was made NoData; whatever cells were NoData remain NoData; the rest of the cells conform to the Local LRA cross-walk. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 58/134

59 * Dataset descriptions for the 10-meter reclassified LOCAL BPS grids: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\local\FRCC BPS_LND.VAT Value Count BPS_LRA.VAT Value Count * Both the cross-walked BPS_LND and BPS_LRA grids were resampled from 10m to 30m. The Resample tool in ArcMap 9.1 was used (ArcToolbox Data Management Tools Raster Resample). Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 59/134

60 The resulting grids BPS_LND2 and BPS_LRA2 are used in the map comparisons. K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\local\FRCC BPS_LND2.VAT Value Count BPS_LRA2.VAT Value Count LANDFIRE National Data preparation * For comparison with the LOCAL data, the LND BPS_WR2 grid was reclassified with the Cross-Walk Code and named BPSWR2_LOC. The ArcMap 9.1 Reclassify tool was used. Whatever cells were NoData remain NoData. * Next, the BPSWR2_LOC grid was reprojected from Albers NAD83 to UTM Zone 11 NAD27 via a two-step process using the ArcMap 9.1 Project Raster tool (ArcToolbox Data Management Tools Projections and Transformations Raster Project Raster). First, the grid was reprojected to UTM11 NAD83, then the intermediary dataset was reprojected to UTM11 NAD27. The intermediary grid (which was deleted) had a cell size of meters (rather than the inputted 30 meters). However, during the second phase of the reprojection process, the cell size became 30 meters. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 60/134

61 The final reprojected dataset was also (re)named BPSWR2_LOC. K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lnd BPSWR2_LOC K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\lnd BPSWR2_LOC Note the differences in cell count between the two reprojected grids. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 61/134

62 BPSWR2_LOC (albers) Value Count BPSWR2_LOC (utm) Value Count LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment data preparation * For comparison with the LOCAL data, the LRA RAPNVG_WR2 grid was reclassified with the Cross-Walk Code and named PNVGWR2_LC. The ArcMap 9.1 Reclassify tool was used. Whatever cells were NoData remain NoData. * The PNVGWR2_LC grid, like the LND data, was reprojected via a two-step process to UTM 11 NAD27. The intermediary grid had a cell size of meters rather than the inputted 30m. However, when reprojected from UTM11 NAD83 to UTM11 NAD27, the resulting grid was 30 meters. The final reprojected LRA BpS grid was also (re)named PNVGWR2_LC. (has/had 2 Count fields???) K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\albersnad83\wassukap\lra PNVGWR2_LC K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\lra PNVGWR2_LC Again, note the difference in cell count between the reprojected and original grids. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 62/134

63 PNVGWR2_LC (albers) Value Count PNVGWR2_LC (utm) Value Count Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 63/134

64 LOCAL LND BpS Comparison How well do the LOCAL BpS and LANDFIRE National BpS compare (i.e., match) on a cell-by-cell basis? To determine this and to have a grid which would display this, the raster grids were Combined in ArcMap 9.1 (ArcToolbox Spatial Analyst Tools Local Combine). The LOCAL LND combined BpS grid: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare BPS_LC_LND BPS_LC_LND represents 237 combinations of LOCAL and LND BpS. The following 13 Values represent cell matches between the LOCAL and NATIONAL BpS: 2, 5, 10, 34, 40, 46, 52, 87, 96, 137, 155, 185, 210. Note: One of above matches is Water. In a cell-to-cell comparison between LOCAL and LND BpS, there is a % match: BPS_LC_LND: cell count of 13 matching Values / total cell count = / = %. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 64/134

65 BPS_LC_LND.VAT Value Count Bps_lnd2 Bpswr2_loc Value Count Bps_lnd2 Bpswr2_loc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 65/134

66 BPS_LC_LND.VAT (continued) Value Count Bps_lnd2 Bpswr2_loc Value Count Bps_lnd2 Bpswr2_loc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 66/134

67 BPS_LC_LND.VAT (continued) Value Count Bps_lnd2 Bpswr2_loc Value Count Bps_lnd2 Bpswr2_loc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 67/134

68 Contingency Table: LOCAL LND BpS Note: Louis developed the contingency table from the grid attribute table. Sum of Count Bps_lnd2 Bpswr2_loc (blank) (blank) Grand Total Grand Total Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 68/134

69 Contingency Table: LOCAL LND BpS (continued) Note: Louis developed the contingency table from the grid attribute table. Sum of Count Bps_lnd2 local Bpswr2_loc (blank) Grand Total % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.021% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.002% 0.000% 0.000% 0.002% 0.002% 0.038% 0.000% 0.000% 0.023% 0.000% 0.003% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.002% 0.029% 0.017% 0.011% 0.022% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.032% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.007% 0.002% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.106% 0.002% 0.000% 0.005% % 0.003% 0.262% 1.091% 2.230% 0.039% 0.000% 1.185% 0.008% 0.000% 0.000% 0.047% 0.007% 0.014% 0.006% % % 0.010% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.045% 0.057% 0.002% 0.175% 0.000% 0.000% 0.048% 0.143% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.001% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.164% 0.025% 0.091% 0.172% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.251% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.002% 0.003% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.010% 0.003% 0.000% 0.001% 3.174% 0.001% 0.023% 4.586% 5.773% 2.637% 0.000% 0.882% 0.011% 0.001% 0.015% 0.122% 0.010% 0.038% 0.003% % % 0.020% 0.005% 0.000% 0.000% 3.959% 0.000% 0.008% 3.880% 7.287% 2.185% 0.000% 1.879% 0.017% 0.001% 0.005% 0.092% 0.003% 0.001% 0.004% % % 0.279% 0.005% 0.159% 0.000% 0.717% 0.000% 0.000% 0.815% 6.428% % 0.000% 0.019% 0.938% 0.171% 0.051% 0.158% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.004% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.018% 0.003% 0.001% 0.471% 0.000% 0.000% 0.098% 0.079% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.008% 0.005% 0.000% 0.002% 2.444% 0.005% 0.083% 1.212% 1.085% 0.195% 0.066% 1.367% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.055% 0.024% 0.021% 0.004% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.007% 0.000% 0.000% 0.013% 0.022% 0.010% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.004% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.028% 0.000% 0.019% 0.000% 0.022% 0.000% 0.000% 0.138% 0.579% 0.641% 0.000% 0.000% 0.111% 0.005% 0.001% 0.101% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.003% 0.002% 0.044% 0.002% 1.284% 0.001% 0.010% 0.110% 0.162% 0.033% 0.000% 0.239% 0.002% 0.015% 0.000% 0.387% 0.010% 0.002% 0.003% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.002% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.049% 0.000% 0.000% 0.027% 0.023% 0.036% 0.002% 0.007% 0.006% 0.000% 0.014% 0.002% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.016% 0.000% 0.000% 0.002% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.010% 0.001% 0.001% 0.006% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.009% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.022% 0.013% 0.003% 0.011% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.023% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.014% 0.000% 0.000% 0.002% 0.003% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % (blank) % 0 Grand Total 0.039% 0.493% 0.025% 0.223% 0.012% % 0.125% 0.495% % % % 0.215% 6.116% 1.119% 0.193% 0.090% 0.978% 0.063% 0.076% 0.020% Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 69/134

70 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 70/134

71 LOCAL LRA BpS Comparison How well do the LOCAL BpS and LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment BpS compare (i.e., match) on a cell-by-cell basis? To determine this and to have a grid which would display this, the raster grids were Combined in ArcMap 9.1 (ArcToolbox Spatial Analyst Tools Local Combine). The LOCAL LRA combined BpS grid: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare BPS_LC_LRA BPS_LC_LRA represents 157 combinations of LOCAL and LRA BpS. The following 8 Values represent cell matches between the LOCAL and Rapid Assessment BpS: 2, 4, 23, 32, 34, 42, 43, 56. Note: One of above matches is Water. In a cell-to-cell comparison between LOCAL and LRA BpS, there is a % match: BPS_LC_LRA: cell count of 8 matching Values / total cell count = / = %. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 71/134

72 BPS_LC_LRA.VAT Value Count Bps_lra2 Pnvgwr2_lc Value Count Bps_lra2 Pnvgwr2_lc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 72/134

73 BPS_LC_LRA.VAT (continued) Value Count Bps_lra2 Pnvgwr2_lc Value Count Bps_lra2 Pnvgwr2_lc Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 73/134

74 Contingency Table: LOCAL LRA BpS Note: Louis developed the contingency table from the grid attribute table. Sum of Count Pnvgwr2_lc LRA Bps_lra (blank) Local (blank) Grand Total Grand Total Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 74/134

75 Contingency Table: LOCAL LRA BpS (continued) Note: Louis developed the contingency table from the grid attribute table. local (blank) Grand Total RA % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.009% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% % % 0.042% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 7.921% 0.034% 0.482% 0.790% 0.089% 0.002% 1.978% 0.314% 0.000% 0.080% 0.001% 0.158% 0.000% 0.008% 0.000% % % 0.008% 0.000% 0.000% 0.006% 4.446% 0.072% 0.300% 0.000% 0.214% 0.000% 0.306% 0.008% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.014% 0.001% % % 0.001% 0.000% 0.005% 0.000% 1.042% 0.001% 0.211% 0.004% 0.671% 0.000% 0.010% 0.120% 0.036% 0.000% 0.060% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% % % 0.201% 0.003% 0.218% 0.000% 0.298% 0.000% 0.378% % 0.000% 0.000% 1.236% 3.880% 0.041% 0.000% 0.000% 0.536% 0.193% 0.497% 0.000% % % 0.077% 0.015% 0.000% 0.006% % 0.355% 5.158% 0.006% 4.776% 0.017% 1.998% 1.507% 0.037% 0.022% 0.015% 0.000% 0.000% 0.078% 0.046% % % 0.002% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.056% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.017% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % % 0.031% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 2.568% 0.000% 5.194% 5.008% 0.007% 0.000% 3.805% 7.039% 0.008% 0.000% 0.000% 0.003% 0.000% 0.363% 0.000% % % 0.005% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.730% 0.000% 0.382% 0.869% 0.000% 0.000% 0.690% 0.226% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.016% 0.000% 0.003% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.063% 0.000% 0.009% 0.000% 0.025% 0.000% 0.000% 0.062% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% % % 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.020% 0.000% 0.009% 0.000% 0.019% 0.000% 0.005% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.001% % % 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.020% 0.032% 0.240% 0.000% 0.114% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.019% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.002% % % 0.108% 0.003% 0.000% 0.000% 0.143% 0.000% 0.053% 1.912% 0.001% 0.000% 0.201% 0.065% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.407% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% % % 0.002% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.191% 0.002% 0.216% 0.000% 0.158% 0.001% 0.004% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.013% % % 0.014% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.318% 0.000% 0.042% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.003% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% % (blank) % <-correct Grand Total 0.039% 0.493% 0.025% 0.223% 0.012% % 0.495% % % 6.116% 0.020% % % 0.123% 0.125% 0.076% 1.119% 0.193% 0.978% 0.063% total cell Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 75/134

76 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 76/134

77 Task IV.2. Comparison of LOCAL and LANDFIRE FRCC (stratafrcc) data. Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) data were developed for the Wassuk Range using (a) Local, (b) LND and (c) LRA inputs for BpS, SClass, and Reference Conditions at both (i) project and (ii) west & east basins scales/areas. The LANDFIRE FRCC Mapping Tool generated the FRCC data. The FRCC MT creates several different FRCC outputs. Only the STRATAFRCC were used in this analysis. With ArcMap s raster tools, a comparison was made to determine how well the LOCAL and (A) LND or (B) LRA FRCC data match on a cell-by-cell basis. FRCC Values are 1, 2 and 3. Value 4 represents cells that do not have an actual FRCC value. The LOCAL FRCC data contains all 4 Values. The LANDFIRE data created by the FRCC MT only have Values 1,2,3; there are holes where the Value 4 would ostensibly be. (Any other reason to account for the holes; like, for example, the fact that while BPS data typically have valid Values for all cells within a project area, SCLASS data often do not?.) Ideally, all STRATAFRCC data will have Values 1,2,3,4 in order to account for all cells and to perform a more thorough analysis. LOCAL Data Preparation: Local Project * The local STRATFRCC data for the project area has Values 1, 2, 3 and 4. Values 1, 2 and 3 correspond to FRCC 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Value 4 is the non-frcc class (and is called -99 in the STRATFRCC field). In this dataset, Value 4 represents, ostensibly, the non-frcc within the project area, but it also represents the background beyond the project boundary. To deal with this, the grid needs to be clipped to the project boundary. First, the project boundary needed to have its background removed using the Reclassify tool. The 10-meter grid WASSUK thus became WASSUKB by making the background (Value 0) NoData. Next, STRATFRCC was clipped to WASSUKB using the Raster Calculator resulting in STRATFRCCB. So Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 77/134

78 Finally, STRATFRCCB was Resampled to 30 meters and called STRATFRCC3 (see ## note below). The final grid for use in the data comparisons: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\local\FRCC\OUT4 STRATFRCC3 STRATFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc STRATFRCCB.VAT Value Count STRATFRCC3.VAT Value Count ## Note: Originally, the final grid was named STRATFRCC2. However, running the Combine tool with grids having the same name produces bad results. Do NOT Combine grids with the same name. To differentiate among the various STRATFRCC grids used in the data comparisons, sequential numbers (2, 3, etc) were randomly applied to the grid names. Hence, STRATFRCC3 (when there is no STRATFRCC2). Local Basins * The local STRATFRCC has Values 1, 2, 3 and 4. Values 1, 2 and 3 represent FRCC 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Value 4 is the non-frcc class (and is -99 in the STRATFRCC field). In this dataset, Value 4 represents non- FRCC cells as well as the background, so it needs to be clipped to the project boundary. First, STRATFRCC was clipped to WASSUKB using the Raster Calculator resulting in STRATFRCCB. Next, STRATFRCCB was Resampled to 30 meters and named STRATFRCC4. The final grid for use in the data comparisons: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\local\FRCC\OUT2 STRATFRCC4 STRATFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc STRATFRCCB.VAT Value Count STRATFRCC4.VAT Value Count Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 78/134

79 LANDFIRE National data preparation: LND Project * The LND STRATAFRCC dataset for the project area has Values 1, 2 and 3 corresponding to FRCC 1, 2 and 3, respectively. However, the dataset does not contain the Value 4 for non-frcc. To get em back, the grid will be Reclassified so that NoData is changed to Value 4, then the resulting grid will be clipped to the project boundary. Finally, the data needs to be reprojected from Albers NAD83 to UTM Zone 11 NAD27. First, using ArcMap s Reclassify tool, STRATAFRCC NoData cells were changed to Value 4 and the new grid was named STRATFRCCB. Second, STRATFRCCB was clipped to WASSUK2B using the Raster Calculator and the resulting grid was named STRATFRCC2. So STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc STRATFRCCB.VAT Value Count STRATFRCC2.VAT Value Count Finally, STRATFRCC2 was reprojected via a two-step process to UTM11 NAD27 and the final grid was also named STRATFRCC2. Again, the intermediary grid had a cell size of , but in the second phase of reprojection the grid was 30 meters. The final grid for use with map comparisons: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\lnd\frcc\wassuk STRATFRCC2 Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 79/134

80 STRATFRCC2.VAT Value Count LND - Basins The LND STATAFRCC has Values 1, 2 and 3 (corresponding to FRCC 1, 2 and 3, respectively), but it does not contain the non-frcc Value 4. First, using the Reclassify tool, STRATAFRCC NoData cells were changed to Value 4 and the new grid was named STRATFRCCB. Second, STRATFRCCB was clipped to WASSUK2B using the Raster Calculator to create STRATFRCC5. STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc STRATFRCCB.VAT Value Count STRATFRCC5.VAT Value Count Finally, STRATFRCC5 was 2-step reprojected (ArcMap Project Raster) and the output was also named STRATFRCC5. The intermediary dataset had a cell size of meters; the final output had a 30-meter cell size. The final dataset for use in data comparisons: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\lnd\frcc\basins STRATFRCC5 STRATFRCC5.VAT Value Count Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 80/134

81 LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment data preparation: LRA Project * The LRA STRATAFRCC has Values 1, 2 and 3 which correspond to FRCC 1, 2 and 3, respectively. However, the dataset does not include the non-frcc Value 4. Using the Reclassify tool, STRATAFRCC NoData cells were changed to Value 4, and the new grid was named STRATFRCCB. STRATFRCCB was then clipped to WASSUK2B using the Raster Calculator to create STRATFRCC6. STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc STRATFRCCB.VAT Value Count STRATFRCC6.VAT Value Count STRATFRCC6 was reprojected (ArcMap Project Raster) via a 2-step process from Albers NAD83 to UTM 11 NAD27. The reprojected grid was also (re)named STRATFRCC6. The intermediary grid had a cell size of meters even though 30 m was inputted as the cell size. The final grid has a 30m cell. The final grid for data comparison: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\lra\frcc\wassuk STRATFRCC6 STRATFRCC6.VAT Value Count LRA Basins * The LRA STRATAFRCC for the west-east basins area has Values 1, 2 and 3 which represent FRCC 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Since Value 4 (non-frcc) cells are not in this dataset, they needed to be recovered. STRATFRCC was Reclassifed so that NoData cells became Value 4 and the output was named STRATFRCCB. Next, STRATFRCCB was clipped to WASSUK2B to create STRATFRCC7. STRATAFRCC.VAT Value Count Stratafrcc STRATFRCCB.VAT Value Count STRATFRCC7.VAT Value Count Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 81/134

82 Finally, STRATFRCC7 was 2-step reprojected and the output was (re)named STRATFRCC7. Once again, the intermediary dataset (in UTM 11 NAD83) had a cell size of meters. The final dataset for comparisons: K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\lra\frcc\basins STRATFRCC7 STRATFRCC7.VAT Value Count Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 82/134

83 LOCAL LND FRCC Comparison Project Area FRCC The LOCAL STRATFRCC3 and the LND STRATFRCC2 grids for the Wassuk Range project area were compared by generating a new grid with the Combine tool. The new grid was named FC_LC_ND_W (combined LoCal and lnd FrcC for the Wassuk project area). K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare FC_LC_ND_W.VAT FC_LC_ND_W.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc3 Stratfrcc LOCAL LND Project FRCC Contingency Table Note: Louis developed this from the grid table. local FRCC total % 6.89% 29.39% 0.49% 43.85% % 11.53% 12.91% 0.16% 54.28% national FRCC % 0.60% 0.00% 0.01% 0.78% % 0.05% 0.52% 0.13% 1.09% total 37.32% 19.07% 42.82% 0.79% 18.74% <-correct In a cell-to-cell comparison between LOCAL and LND FRCC at the project level, there is a % match: FC_LC_ND_W: cell count of matching Values / total count = / = %. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 83/134

84 Basins Area FRCC The local STRATFRCC4 and the LND STRATFRCC5 for the west-east basins areas were compared by generating a new grid with the Combine tool. The new grid was named FC_LC_ND_B (combined LoCal and lnd FrcC for the Basins areas). K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare FC_LC_ND_B FC_LC_ND_B.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc4 Stratfrcc LOCAL LND Basins FRCC Contingency Table Note: Louis developed this from the grid table. Sum of Count Stratfrcc4 Stratfrcc Grand Total % % % 0.490% % % % 9.828% 0.155% % % 1.931% 0.068% 0.016% 3.149% % 0.379% 0.191% 0.131% 1.093% Grand Total % % % 0.791% % In a cell-to-cell comparison between LOCAL and LND FRCC at the basins level, there is a 20.82% match. FC_LC_ND_B.VAT: cell count of matching Values / total count = / = 20.82%. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 84/134

85 LOCAL LRA FRCC Comparison Project Area FRCC The local STRATFRCC3 and the LRA STRATFRCC6 for the Wassuk Range project area were compared by generating a new grid with the Combine tool. The new grid was named FC_LC_RA_W (combined LoCal and lra FrcC for the Wassuk project area). K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare FC_LC_RA_W FC_LC_RA_W.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc3 Stratfrcc LOCAL LRA Project FRCC Contingency Table Note: Louis developed this from the grid table. Sum of Count Stratfrcc3 local Stratfrcc Grand Total % 6.048% % 0.060% % % % % 0.560% % % 0.150% 2.140% 0.115% 3.053% % 0.042% 0.158% 0.056% 0.600% Grand Total % % % 0.791% % In a cell-to-cell comparison between LOCAL and LRA FRCC at the project level, there is a % match. FC_LC_RA_W: cell count of matching Values / total count = / = %. <- correct Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 85/134

86 Basins Area FRCC The Local STRATFRCC4 and the LRA STRATFRCC7 for the basins areas were compared by creating a new grid with the Combine tool. The new grid was named FC_LC_RA_B (combined LoCal and lra FrcC for the Basins areas). K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare FC_LC_RA_B FC_LC_RA_B.VAT Value Count Stratfrcc4 Stratfrcc LOCAL LRA Basins FRCC Contingency Table Note: Louis developed this from the grid table. Sum of Count Stratfrcc4 local Stratfrcc Grand Total % 7.686% % 0.056% % % % % 0.564% % % 2.406% 0.065% 0.116% 3.370% % 0.101% 0.099% 0.056% 0.600% Grand Total % % % 0.791% % In a cell-to-cell comparison between LOCAL and LRA FRCC at the basins level, there is a % match. FC_LC_RA_B: cell count of matching Values / total count = / = %. <- correct Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 86/134

87 Task IV.3. LOCAL LANDFIRE Joint BpS & FRCC Data Comparisons Data comparison: LOCAL versus LND or LRA. For a given BpS, for those cells which match between LOCAL and LANDFIRE, how well do the FRCC match (at both project and basins scales)? Note: These grid comparisons utilize a Combine of the cross-walked, combined LOCAL-LANDFIRE BpS and the combined LOCAL-LANDIFRE FRCC. The FRCC were generated with separate Local, LND or LRA BpS (and other) inputs. The combined BpS represents the cross-walked BpS rather than the original. The presumption is that the cross-walked BpS is effectively the same as the original BpS; therefore, it is appropriate to use these combined BpS grids in this set of data comparisons. Methodology: Step 1. Use the combined LOCAL-LANDFIRE BpS grid. Local LND: BPS_LC_LND (12 BpS matches not counting Water) Local LRA: BPS_LC_LRA (7 BpS matches not counting Water) Step 2. Reclassify so all cells - except for one BpS and the one Value that is a match - are NoData. Output grid nomenclature: Local LND: BPSCN#### (BPS local-lnd 4-digit bps_code) Local LRA: BPSCR#### (BPS local-lra 4-digit bps_code) Step 3. Combine this BpS grid with the combined LOCAL-LANDFIRE FRCC grid. Local LND (project): FC_LC_ND_W Local LND (basins): FC_LC_ND_B Local LRA (project): FC_LC_RA_W Local LRA (basins): FC_LC_RA_B Step 4. The output grid provides the data comparison: for a given BpS matched between Local and LANDFIRE datasets, how well do the FRCC cells match? Output grid nomenclature: Local LND (project): BFCNW#### (Bps-Frcc local-lnd Wassuk-level 4-digit bps_code) Local LND (basins): BFCNB#### (Bps-Frcc local-lnd Basins-level 4-digit bps_code) Local LRA (project): BFCRW#### (Bps-Frcc local-lra Wassuk-level 4-digit bps_code) Local LRA (basins): BFCRB#### (Bps-Frcc local-lra Basins-level 4-digit bps_code) Output: Local LND (project) K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare\bpsfrcc\local_lnd\wassuk Local LND (basins) K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare\bpsfrcc\local_lnd\basins Local LRA (project) K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare\bpsfrcc\local_lra\wassuk Local LRA (basins) K:\GIS1\landfire\geodata\utm11nad27\wassukap\compare\bpsfrcc\local_lra\basins Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 87/134

88 LOCAL LND Project * Reclassified BPS_LC_LND so that only Value 46 (BpS 1126 matched in LOCAL and LND) remains; the rest are NoData. The new grid is BPSCN1126 (matched BpS 1126 from combined local and lnd). * Combined BPSCN1126 with FC_LC_ND_W (combined LOCAL-LND FRCC at project level). The new grid is BFCNW1126. Wassuk Range NV LANDFIRE Application Project GIS Analysis & Metadata.doc 88/134

Note: This validation is designed to test the accuracy of the mapping process (i.e. the map models) not the accuracy of the map itself.

Note: This validation is designed to test the accuracy of the mapping process (i.e. the map models) not the accuracy of the map itself. Ecological Classes and Criteria for Assigning Fuzzy Set Values Fuzzy set validation assessment is being used to evaluate land cover mapping by comparing the label of reference point to map. The validation

More information

The Nature Conservancy, 1 East First Street, Suite 1007, Reno, Nevada 89509, USA

The Nature Conservancy, 1 East First Street, Suite 1007, Reno, Nevada 89509, USA Page 126 Short Communication Comparing Locally Derived and LANDFIRE Geo-Layers in the Great Basin, USA Louis Provencher *,1, Kori Blankenship 2, Jim Smith 3, Jeff Campbell 4, and Mike Polly 1 1 The Nature

More information

Development of statewide 30 meter winter sage grouse habitat models for Utah

Development of statewide 30 meter winter sage grouse habitat models for Utah Development of statewide 30 meter winter sage grouse habitat models for Utah Ben Crabb, Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Laboratory, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University

More information

Exercise 6: Working with Raster Data in ArcGIS 9.3

Exercise 6: Working with Raster Data in ArcGIS 9.3 Exercise 6: Working with Raster Data in ArcGIS 9.3 Why Spatial Analyst? Grid query Grid algebra Grid statistics Summary by zone Proximity mapping Reclassification Histograms Surface analysis Slope, aspect,

More information

Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage Project (FERC No ) Vegetation Mapping and Habitat Assessment Study Plan

Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage Project (FERC No ) Vegetation Mapping and Habitat Assessment Study Plan March 21, 2018 1.0 Introduction Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage LLC (BCV), a subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp. (ITC), submitted a preliminary permit application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

More information

One of the many strengths of a GIS is that you can stack several data layers on top of each other for visualization or analysis. For example, if you

One of the many strengths of a GIS is that you can stack several data layers on top of each other for visualization or analysis. For example, if you One of the many strengths of a GIS is that you can stack several data layers on top of each other for visualization or analysis. For example, if you overlay a map of the habitat for an endangered species

More information

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources Lesson 2 - Vector Data Coordinate-based data structures commonly used to represent map objects. Each object is represented as a list of X,Y coordinates Examples

More information

Tutorial 8 Raster Data Analysis

Tutorial 8 Raster Data Analysis Objectives Tutorial 8 Raster Data Analysis This tutorial is designed to introduce you to a basic set of raster-based analyses including: 1. Displaying Digital Elevation Model (DEM) 2. Slope calculations

More information

Course overview. Grading and Evaluation. Final project. Where and When? Welcome to REM402 Applied Spatial Analysis in Natural Resources.

Course overview. Grading and Evaluation. Final project. Where and When? Welcome to REM402 Applied Spatial Analysis in Natural Resources. Welcome to REM402 Applied Spatial Analysis in Natural Resources Eva Strand, University of Idaho Map of the Pacific Northwest from http://www.or.blm.gov/gis/ Where and When? Lectures Monday & Wednesday

More information

GIS IN ECOLOGY: ANALYZING RASTER DATA

GIS IN ECOLOGY: ANALYZING RASTER DATA GIS IN ECOLOGY: ANALYZING RASTER DATA Contents Introduction... 2 Raster Tools and Functionality... 2 Data Sources... 3 Tasks... 4 Getting Started... 4 Creating Raster Data... 5 Statistics... 8 Surface

More information

Lesson 9: California Ecosystem and Geography

Lesson 9: California Ecosystem and Geography California Education Standards: Kindergarten, Earth Sciences 3. Earth is composed of land air, and water. As a basis for understanding this concept: b. Students know changes in weather occur from day to

More information

Overlay Analysis II: Using Zonal and Extract Tools to Transfer Raster Values in ArcMap

Overlay Analysis II: Using Zonal and Extract Tools to Transfer Raster Values in ArcMap Overlay Analysis II: Using Zonal and Extract Tools to Transfer Raster Values in ArcMap Created by Patrick Florance and Jonathan Gale, Edited by Catherine Ressijac on March 26, 2018 If you have raster data

More information

GIS IN ECOLOGY: ANALYZING RASTER DATA

GIS IN ECOLOGY: ANALYZING RASTER DATA GIS IN ECOLOGY: ANALYZING RASTER DATA Contents Introduction... 2 Tools and Functionality for Raster Data... 2 Data Sources... 3 Tasks... 4 Getting Started... 4 Creating Raster Data... 5 Summary Statistics...

More information

Lab 7: Cell, Neighborhood, and Zonal Statistics

Lab 7: Cell, Neighborhood, and Zonal Statistics Lab 7: Cell, Neighborhood, and Zonal Statistics Exercise 1: Use the Cell Statistics function to detect change In this exercise, you will use the Spatial Analyst Cell Statistics function to compare the

More information

ANCILLARY DATA VARIABLES

ANCILLARY DATA VARIABLES ANCILLARY DATA VARIABLES PROCESSING INFORMATION AND MODELING USES Version 1.0 1 BACKGROUND The ancillary data component of the project included creation of a core dataset of 58 variables, of which 24 variables

More information

Delineation of high landslide risk areas as a result of land cover, slope, and geology in San Mateo County, California

Delineation of high landslide risk areas as a result of land cover, slope, and geology in San Mateo County, California Delineation of high landslide risk areas as a result of land cover, slope, and geology in San Mateo County, California Introduction Problem Overview This project attempts to delineate the high-risk areas

More information

How to Create Stream Networks using DEM and TauDEM

How to Create Stream Networks using DEM and TauDEM How to Create Stream Networks using DEM and TauDEM Take note: These procedures do not describe all steps. Knowledge of ArcGIS, DEMs, and TauDEM is required. TauDEM software ( http://hydrology.neng.usu.edu/taudem/

More information

Crystal Moncada. California State University San Bernardino. January- July Brett R. Goforth- Department of Geography and Environmental Studies

Crystal Moncada. California State University San Bernardino. January- July Brett R. Goforth- Department of Geography and Environmental Studies A Geographical Information System (GIS) Based Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Mapped on the Harrison Mountain Quadrangle of the Santa Ana River Watershed Crystal Moncada California State University

More information

Data Structures & Database Queries in GIS

Data Structures & Database Queries in GIS Data Structures & Database Queries in GIS Objective In this lab we will show you how to use ArcGIS for analysis of digital elevation models (DEM s), in relationship to Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis

More information

LANDSLIDE HAZARD ANALYSIS AND ITS EFFECT ON ENDANGERED SPECIES HABITATS, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH

LANDSLIDE HAZARD ANALYSIS AND ITS EFFECT ON ENDANGERED SPECIES HABITATS, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH 12/5/2016 LANDSLIDE HAZARD ANALYSIS AND ITS EFFECT ON ENDANGERED SPECIES HABITATS, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH GIS Final Project Ashlyn Murphy Fall 2016 1. Introduction and Problem A well-known geologic hazard

More information

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources. Lesson 9: Scale and Accuracy

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources. Lesson 9: Scale and Accuracy NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources Lesson 9: Scale and Accuracy 1 Map scale Map scale specifies the amount of reduction between the real world and the map The map scale specifies how much the

More information

Tropical Moist Rainforest

Tropical Moist Rainforest Tropical or Lowlatitude Climates: Controlled by equatorial tropical air masses Tropical Moist Rainforest Rainfall is heavy in all months - more than 250 cm. (100 in.). Common temperatures of 27 C (80 F)

More information

A Forest Inventory ESTimation and Analysis tool. Tracey Frescino Paul Patterson Elizabeth Freeman Gretchen Moisen

A Forest Inventory ESTimation and Analysis tool. Tracey Frescino Paul Patterson Elizabeth Freeman Gretchen Moisen A Forest Inventory ESTimation and Analysis tool Tracey Frescino Paul Patterson Elizabeth Freeman Gretchen Moisen FIA s Data and Estimation Tools FIA DataMart - Web-based tool to access FIA database through

More information

Erosion Susceptibility in the area Around the Okanogan Fire Complex, Washington, US

Erosion Susceptibility in the area Around the Okanogan Fire Complex, Washington, US Erosion Susceptibility in the area Around the Okanogan Fire Complex, Washington, US 1. Problem Construct a raster that represents susceptibility to erosion based on lithology, slope, cover type, burned

More information

Welcome to NR502 GIS Applications in Natural Resources. You can take this course for 1 or 2 credits. There is also an option for 3 credits.

Welcome to NR502 GIS Applications in Natural Resources. You can take this course for 1 or 2 credits. There is also an option for 3 credits. Welcome to NR502 GIS Applications in Natural Resources. You can take this course for 1 or 2 credits. There is also an option for 3 credits. The 1st credit consists of a series of readings, demonstration,

More information

GIS CONCEPTS ARCGIS METHODS AND. 3 rd Edition, July David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University

GIS CONCEPTS ARCGIS METHODS AND. 3 rd Edition, July David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University GIS CONCEPTS AND ARCGIS METHODS 3 rd Edition, July 2007 David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Copyright Copyright 2007 by David M. Theobald. All rights

More information

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT) An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT) Second half yearly report 01-01-2001-06-30-2001 Prepared for Missouri Department of Natural Resources Missouri Department of

More information

Acknowledgments xiii Preface xv. GIS Tutorial 1 Introducing GIS and health applications 1. What is GIS? 2

Acknowledgments xiii Preface xv. GIS Tutorial 1 Introducing GIS and health applications 1. What is GIS? 2 Acknowledgments xiii Preface xv GIS Tutorial 1 Introducing GIS and health applications 1 What is GIS? 2 Spatial data 2 Digital map infrastructure 4 Unique capabilities of GIS 5 Installing ArcView and the

More information

Handling Raster Data for Hydrologic Applications

Handling Raster Data for Hydrologic Applications Handling Raster Data for Hydrologic Applications Prepared by Venkatesh Merwade Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University vmerwade@purdue.edu January 2018 Objective The objective of this exercise

More information

Southern California Earthquake Center

Southern California Earthquake Center Southern California Earthquake Center By: Mark Slothower Geog 406 Final Report Dr. Sun Table of Contents Introduction Page 3 Hypothesis and research questions Page 3 Methods and flowchart Page 4 Data Page

More information

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources Lesson 1 Introduction to GIS Eva Strand, University of Idaho Map of the Pacific Northwest from http://www.or.blm.gov/gis/ Welcome to NR402 GIS Applications in

More information

NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT

NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee SUMMMARY NatureServe version 31 August 2006 INTRODUCTION The United States Federal Geographic

More information

Exercise 6: Using Burn Severity Data to Model Erosion Risk

Exercise 6: Using Burn Severity Data to Model Erosion Risk Exercise 6: Using Burn Severity Data to Model Erosion Risk Document Updated: November 2009 Software Versions: ERDAS Imagine 9.3 and ArcGIS 9.3, Microsoft Office 2007 Introduction A common use of burn severity

More information

Classification of Erosion Susceptibility

Classification of Erosion Susceptibility GEO327G: GIS & GPS Applications in Earth Sciences Classification of Erosion Susceptibility Denali National Park, Alaska Zehao Xue 12 3 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Abstract... 3 2 Introduction... 3 2.1 Universal

More information

Global Patterns Gaston, K.J Nature 405. Benefit Diversity. Threats to Biodiversity

Global Patterns Gaston, K.J Nature 405. Benefit Diversity. Threats to Biodiversity Biodiversity Definitions the variability among living organisms from all sources, including, 'inter alia', terrestrial, marine, and other aquatic ecosystems, and the ecological complexes of which they

More information

Display data in a map-like format so that geographic patterns and interrelationships are visible

Display data in a map-like format so that geographic patterns and interrelationships are visible Vilmaliz Rodríguez Guzmán M.S. Student, Department of Geology University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Reference: James B. Campbell. Introduction to

More information

7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.2 OBJECTIVE

7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.2 OBJECTIVE 7 LAND USE AND LAND COVER 7.1 INTRODUCTION The knowledge of land use and land cover is important for many planning and management activities as it is considered as an essential element for modeling and

More information

Introduction. Project Summary In 2014 multiple local Otsego county agencies, Otsego County Soil and Water

Introduction. Project Summary In 2014 multiple local Otsego county agencies, Otsego County Soil and Water Introduction Project Summary In 2014 multiple local Otsego county agencies, Otsego County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), the Otsego County Planning Department (OPD), and the Otsego County

More information

MERGING (MERGE / MOSAIC) GEOSPATIAL DATA

MERGING (MERGE / MOSAIC) GEOSPATIAL DATA This help guide describes how to merge two or more feature classes (vector) or rasters into one single feature class or raster dataset. The Merge Tool The Merge Tool combines input features from input

More information

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada Proposals are due no later than November 13, 2015. Grant proposal and any questions should be directed to: Shawn Espinosa @ sepsinosa@ndow.org.

More information

Geography 281 Map Making with GIS Project Eight: Comparing Map Projections

Geography 281 Map Making with GIS Project Eight: Comparing Map Projections Geography 281 Map Making with GIS Project Eight: Comparing Map Projections In this activity, you will do a series of projection comparisons using maps at different scales and geographic extents. In this

More information

Exercise 3: GIS data on the World Wide Web

Exercise 3: GIS data on the World Wide Web Exercise 3: GIS data on the World Wide Web These web sites are a few examples of sites that are serving free GIS data. Many other sites exist. Search in Google or other search engine to find GIS data for

More information

remain on the trees all year long) Example: Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada

remain on the trees all year long) Example: Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada Coniferous Forest Temperature: -40 C to 20 C, average summer temperature is 10 C Precipitation: 300 to 900 millimeters of rain per year Vegetation: Coniferous-evergreen trees (trees that produce cones

More information

Case Study: Ecological Integrity of Grasslands in the Apache Highlands Ecoregion

Case Study: Ecological Integrity of Grasslands in the Apache Highlands Ecoregion Standard 9: Screen all target/biodiversity element occurrences for viability or ecological integrity. Case Study: Ecological Integrity of Grasslands in the Apache Highlands Ecoregion Summarized from: Marshall,

More information

Fire Susceptibility Analysis Carson National Forest New Mexico. Can a geographic information system (GIS) be used to analyze the susceptibility of

Fire Susceptibility Analysis Carson National Forest New Mexico. Can a geographic information system (GIS) be used to analyze the susceptibility of 1 David Werth Fire Susceptibility Analysis Carson National Forest New Mexico Can a geographic information system (GIS) be used to analyze the susceptibility of Carson National Forest, New Mexico to forest

More information

Outcrop suitability analysis of blueschists within the Dry Lakes region of the Condrey Mountain Window, North-central Klamaths, Northern California

Outcrop suitability analysis of blueschists within the Dry Lakes region of the Condrey Mountain Window, North-central Klamaths, Northern California Outcrop suitability analysis of blueschists within the Dry Lakes region of the Condrey Mountain Window, North-central Klamaths, Northern California (1) Introduction: This project proposes to assess the

More information

GIS 2010: Coastal Erosion in Mississippi Delta

GIS 2010: Coastal Erosion in Mississippi Delta 1) Introduction Problem overview To what extent do large storm events play in coastal erosion rates, and what is the rate at which coastal erosion is occurring in sediment starved portions of the Mississippi

More information

Lecture 2. A Review: Geographic Information Systems & ArcGIS Basics

Lecture 2. A Review: Geographic Information Systems & ArcGIS Basics Lecture 2 A Review: Geographic Information Systems & ArcGIS Basics GIS Overview Types of Maps Symbolization & Classification Map Elements GIS Data Models Coordinate Systems and Projections Scale Geodatabases

More information

Upper Owyhee Watershed Assessment

Upper Owyhee Watershed Assessment * Owyhee Watershed Council and Scientific Ecological Services The upper Owyhee subbasin is located in parts of three states: the southeastern corner of Oregon, the southwestern corner of Idaho, and north

More information

Identifying Wildfire Risk Areas in Western Washington State

Identifying Wildfire Risk Areas in Western Washington State Identifying Wildfire Risk Areas in Western Washington State Matthew Seto University of Washington Tacoma GIS Certification Program URISA 2015 Undergraduate Geospatial Skills Competition Introduction 2014

More information

FR Exam 2 Substitute Project!!!!!!! 1

FR Exam 2 Substitute Project!!!!!!! 1 FR5131 - Exam 2 Substitute Project!!!!!!! 1 Goal We seek to identify county lands that both protect vernal pools and riparian corridors, and that provide open space and recreation within easy reach of

More information

Final Project: Geodatabase of Mule Mountains Area, southeastern Arizona

Final Project: Geodatabase of Mule Mountains Area, southeastern Arizona R. Aisner 11/24/09 GEO 386G Final Project: Geodatabase of Mule Mountains Area, southeastern Arizona Project goal: Develop a geodatabase with vector and raster data for future data organization and analysis.

More information

Chapter 7 Part III: Biomes

Chapter 7 Part III: Biomes Chapter 7 Part III: Biomes Biomes Biome: the major types of terrestrial ecosystems determined primarily by climate 2 main factors: Temperature and precipitation Depends on latitude or altitude; proximity

More information

J. Lowry a,, R.D. Ramsey

J. Lowry a,, R.D. Ramsey Remote Sensing of Environment 108 (2007) 59 73 www.elsevier.com/locate/rse Mapping moderate-scale land-cover over very large geographic areas within a collaborative framework: A case study of the Southwest

More information

Global Biogeography. Natural Vegetation. Structure and Life-Forms of Plants. Terrestrial Ecosystems-The Biomes

Global Biogeography. Natural Vegetation. Structure and Life-Forms of Plants. Terrestrial Ecosystems-The Biomes Global Biogeography Natural Vegetation Structure and Life-Forms of Plants Terrestrial Ecosystems-The Biomes Natural Vegetation natural vegetation is the plant cover that develops with little or no human

More information

Delineation of Watersheds

Delineation of Watersheds Delineation of Watersheds Adirondack Park, New York by Introduction Problem Watershed boundaries are increasingly being used in land and water management, separating the direction of water flow such that

More information

Distribution Modeling for the Sierra Bighorn Sheep. threatened by predators, specifically mountain lions. Main aim of this research was to find

Distribution Modeling for the Sierra Bighorn Sheep. threatened by predators, specifically mountain lions. Main aim of this research was to find Chontanat Suwan GEOG 408B, Spring 2013 28 April 2013 Distribution Modeling for the Sierra Bighorn Sheep Abstract The Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep is in the list of endangered species which mainly threatened

More information

Introduction to Spatial Data Resources and Analysis for research in Urban Design and Planning

Introduction to Spatial Data Resources and Analysis for research in Urban Design and Planning Introduction to Spatial Data Resources and Analysis for research in Urban Design and Planning 2-day workshop notes 27-28 September 2004 Introductions please put on a name tag to help me know who you are

More information

GIS CONCEPTS ARCGIS METHODS AND. 2 nd Edition, July David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University

GIS CONCEPTS ARCGIS METHODS AND. 2 nd Edition, July David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University GIS CONCEPTS AND ARCGIS METHODS 2 nd Edition, July 2005 David M. Theobald, Ph.D. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University Copyright Copyright 2005 by David M. Theobald. All rights

More information

Midterm Exam. 2) What are three important things to keep in mind when selecting colors for a map? (5)

Midterm Exam. 2) What are three important things to keep in mind when selecting colors for a map? (5) Midterm Exam File Name: LASTNAME_Midterm.pdf Make sure to include your Name, UWNetID, course number, and quarter and year, on the document (points will be deducted if you have not identified your work).

More information

Biomes There are 2 types: Terrestrial Biomes (on land) Aquatic Biomes (in the water)

Biomes There are 2 types: Terrestrial Biomes (on land) Aquatic Biomes (in the water) Biomes There are 2 types: Terrestrial Biomes (on land) Aquatic Biomes (in the water) Terrestrial Biomes Grassland, Desert, and Tundra Biomes: Savanna Temperate grassland Chaparral Desert Tundra Chapter

More information

Geo 327G Semester Project. Landslide Suitability Assessment of Olympic National Park, WA. Fall Shane Lewis

Geo 327G Semester Project. Landslide Suitability Assessment of Olympic National Park, WA. Fall Shane Lewis Geo 327G Semester Project Landslide Suitability Assessment of Olympic National Park, WA Fall 2011 Shane Lewis 1 I. Problem Landslides cause millions of dollars of damage nationally every year, and are

More information

Geographical Information Systems

Geographical Information Systems Geographical Information Systems Geographical Information Systems (GIS) is a relatively new technology that is now prominent in the ecological sciences. This tool allows users to map geographic features

More information

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map Created By: Linda Kersten, 12/20/06 Created For: MTU Introduction to GIS Class (FW 5550) The Huron Creek Watershed Advisory Committee Michigan Technological University,

More information

CHAPTER 1 THE UNITED STATES 2001 NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE

CHAPTER 1 THE UNITED STATES 2001 NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE CHAPTER 1 THE UNITED STATES 2001 NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE Collin Homer*, Jon Dewitz, Joyce Fry, and Nazmul Hossain *U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science

More information

Landscape Design Series 2. Authored by Larry A. Sagers Horticulture Specialist Utah Sate University

Landscape Design Series 2. Authored by Larry A. Sagers Horticulture Specialist Utah Sate University Landscape Design Series 2 Authored by Larry A. Sagers Horticulture Specialist Utah Sate University The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image

More information

Exercie 5 Preparing GIS data for simulation with FARSITE REM407 GIS Applications in Fire Ecology and Management

Exercie 5 Preparing GIS data for simulation with FARSITE REM407 GIS Applications in Fire Ecology and Management Exercie 5 Preparing GIS data for simulation with FARSITE REM407 GIS Applications in Fire Ecology and Management Assignment: Make maps of the Fuelmodel layer and the clipped Canopy cover layer and submit

More information

Alaska, USA. Sam Robbins

Alaska, USA. Sam Robbins Using ArcGIS to determine erosion susceptibility within Denali National Park, Alaska, USA Sam Robbins Introduction Denali National Park is six million acres of wild land with only one road and one road

More information

Spatial Analyst: Multiple Criteria Evaluation Material adapted from FOR 4114 developed by Forestry Associate Professor Steve Prisley

Spatial Analyst: Multiple Criteria Evaluation Material adapted from FOR 4114 developed by Forestry Associate Professor Steve Prisley Spatial Analyst: Multiple Criteria Evaluation Material adapted from FOR 4114 developed by Forestry Associate Professor Steve Prisley Section 1: Data In this exercise we will be working with several types

More information

Suitability Analysis on Second Home Areas Selection in Smithers British Columbia

Suitability Analysis on Second Home Areas Selection in Smithers British Columbia GEOG 613 Term Project Suitability Analysis on Second Home Areas Selection in Smithers British Columbia Zhengzhe He November 2005 Abstract Introduction / background Data Source Data Manipulation Spatial

More information

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2008 There are 4 questions on this exam. Please do all 4.

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2008 There are 4 questions on this exam. Please do all 4. Page 1 of 8 Name: GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2008 There are 4 questions on this exam. Please do all 4. 1. Basic Concepts [20 points] Find the letter with the best answer for each term: 1.

More information

The Geodatabase Working with Spatial Analyst. Calculating Elevation and Slope Values for Forested Roads, Streams, and Stands.

The Geodatabase Working with Spatial Analyst. Calculating Elevation and Slope Values for Forested Roads, Streams, and Stands. GIS LAB 7 The Geodatabase Working with Spatial Analyst. Calculating Elevation and Slope Values for Forested Roads, Streams, and Stands. This lab will ask you to work with the Spatial Analyst extension.

More information

Looking at the big picture to plan land treatments

Looking at the big picture to plan land treatments Looking at the big picture to plan land treatments Eva Strand Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management University of Idaho evas@uidaho.edu, http://www.cnr.uidaho.edu/range Why land treatment planning?

More information

Projecting a Gully on Wilson Ranch Meadow, Eldorado National Forest By David Russell and Angelina Lasko Humboldt State University

Projecting a Gully on Wilson Ranch Meadow, Eldorado National Forest By David Russell and Angelina Lasko Humboldt State University Projecting a Gully on Wilson Ranch Meadow, Eldorado National Forest By David Russell and Angelina Lasko Humboldt State University Introduction The purpose of this project is to create a digital elevation

More information

4. GIS Implementation of the TxDOT Hydrology Extensions

4. GIS Implementation of the TxDOT Hydrology Extensions 4. GIS Implementation of the TxDOT Hydrology Extensions A Geographic Information System (GIS) is a computer-assisted system for the capture, storage, retrieval, analysis and display of spatial data. It

More information

Anne Trainor Matt Simon Geog 593 Final Project Report December 8, 2006

Anne Trainor Matt Simon Geog 593 Final Project Report December 8, 2006 Anne Trainor Matt Simon Geog 593 Final Project Report December 8, 2006 INTRODUCTION Habitat fragmentation has led to an increasingly patchy landscape. This has forced land managers to adopt a metapopulation

More information

Map Projections. Displaying the earth on 2 dimensional maps

Map Projections. Displaying the earth on 2 dimensional maps Map Projections Displaying the earth on 2 dimensional maps Map projections Define the spatial relationship between locations on earth and their relative locations on a flat map Are mathematical expressions

More information

LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN THE SOUTHWEST: Historical changes in selected ecosystems of the southwestern United States

LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN THE SOUTHWEST: Historical changes in selected ecosystems of the southwestern United States LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN THE SOUTHWEST: Historical changes in selected ecosystems of the southwestern United States Robert H. Webb U.S. Geological Survey 520 N. Park Avenue Tucson, AZ 85719 rhwebb@usgs.gov

More information

Resolving habitat classification and structure using aerial photography. Michael Wilson Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary

Resolving habitat classification and structure using aerial photography. Michael Wilson Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary Resolving habitat classification and structure using aerial photography Michael Wilson Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary Aerial Photo-interpretation Digitizing features of aerial

More information

Developing Reactivity- and Source-Based Monoterpene Parameterizations for SOA Modeling

Developing Reactivity- and Source-Based Monoterpene Parameterizations for SOA Modeling Kelley Barsanti, Isaac Afreh, Jia Jiang Chemical & Environmental Engineering/CE-CERT Developing Reactivity- and Source-Based Monoterpene Parameterizations for SOA Modeling Overview of SOA Formation 2.

More information

Raster Spatial Analysis Specific Theory

Raster Spatial Analysis Specific Theory RSATheory.doc 1 Raster Spatial Analysis Specific Theory... 1 Spatial resampling... 1 Mosaic... 3 Reclassification... 4 Slicing... 4 Zonal Operations... 5 References... 5 Raster Spatial Analysis Specific

More information

How does the physical environment influence communities and ecosystems? Hoodoos in Cappadocia, Turkey

How does the physical environment influence communities and ecosystems? Hoodoos in Cappadocia, Turkey Biomes of the World How does the physical environment influence communities and ecosystems? Hoodoos in Cappadocia, Turkey ecosystems are shaped by: abiotic factors climate/weather space Rainfall Soil air

More information

Exercise 2: Working with Vector Data in ArcGIS 9.3

Exercise 2: Working with Vector Data in ArcGIS 9.3 Exercise 2: Working with Vector Data in ArcGIS 9.3 There are several tools in ArcGIS 9.3 used for GIS operations on vector data. In this exercise we will use: Analysis Tools in ArcToolbox Overlay Analysis

More information

Chapter 6. Field Trip to Sandia Mountains.

Chapter 6. Field Trip to Sandia Mountains. University of New Mexico Biology 310L Principles of Ecology Lab Manual Page -40 Chapter 6. Field Trip to Sandia Mountains. Outline of activities: 1. Travel to Sandia Mountains 2. Collect forest community

More information

REFERENCING COORDINATE SYSTEMS MAP PROJECTIONS GEOREFERENCING

REFERENCING COORDINATE SYSTEMS MAP PROJECTIONS GEOREFERENCING GIS in Ecology SPATIAL REFERENCING COORDINATE SYSTEMS MAP PROJECTIONS GEOREFERENCING : :1 Where on earth? Early mapmakers recognized the need for a system that could locate features on the earth's surface.

More information

BIOMES. Definition of a Biome. Terrestrial referring to land. Climatically controlled sets of ecosystems. Characterized by distinct vegetation

BIOMES. Definition of a Biome. Terrestrial referring to land. Climatically controlled sets of ecosystems. Characterized by distinct vegetation BIOMES An Introduction to the Biomes of the World Definition of a Biome Terrestrial referring to land Climatically controlled sets of ecosystems Characterized by distinct vegetation 1 In a Biome There

More information

2.1.2 Land cover data

2.1.2 Land cover data 2.1.2 Land cover data Land cover data was used as an approximate measure of the different habitat groupings throughout Britain. Land cover data was obtained from three sources The European Environment

More information

Data Set Projection Checklist

Data Set Projection Checklist 1 of 6 12/20/2012 12:38 PM Data Set Projection Checklist There are two projections/coordinate systems you must worry about: 1. 2. That of your map. You can pick this to be whatever you want, and your GIS

More information

Outline Anatomy of ArcGIS Metadata Data Types Vector Raster Conversion Adding Data Navigation Symbolization Methods Layer Files Editing Help Files

Outline Anatomy of ArcGIS Metadata Data Types Vector Raster Conversion Adding Data Navigation Symbolization Methods Layer Files Editing Help Files UPlan Training Lab Exercise: Introduction to ArcGIS Outline Anatomy of ArcGIS Metadata Data Types Vector Raster Conversion Adding Data Navigation Symbolization Methods Layer Files Editing Help Files Anatomy

More information

GIS Semester Project Working With Water Well Data in Irion County, Texas

GIS Semester Project Working With Water Well Data in Irion County, Texas GIS Semester Project Working With Water Well Data in Irion County, Texas Grant Hawkins Question for the Project Upon picking a random point in Irion county, Texas, to what depth would I have to drill a

More information

Geodatabase Management Pathway

Geodatabase Management Pathway Geodatabase Management Pathway Table of Contents ArcGIS Desktop II: Tools and Functionality 3 ArcGIS Desktop III: GIS Workflows and Analysis 6 Building Geodatabases 8 Data Management in the Multiuser Geodatabase

More information

Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects

Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University PIF CDW St. Louis, MO April 11, 2006 Types of

More information

MODELING LIGHTNING AS AN IGNITION SOURCE OF RANGELAND WILDFIRE IN SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO

MODELING LIGHTNING AS AN IGNITION SOURCE OF RANGELAND WILDFIRE IN SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO MODELING LIGHTNING AS AN IGNITION SOURCE OF RANGELAND WILDFIRE IN SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO Keith T. Weber, Ben McMahan, Paul Johnson, and Glenn Russell GIS Training and Research Center Idaho State University

More information

Georeferencing the Lackawanna Synclinorium using GIS

Georeferencing the Lackawanna Synclinorium using GIS Georeferencing the Lackawanna Synclinorium using GIS Conservation Services, LLC 2/20/2010 Contact: Philip Pass 570.510.1758 Rick Marquardt 570-335-7525 Managing Partners: Conservation Services LLC Author:

More information

Unit 2. United States Physical Geography

Unit 2. United States Physical Geography Unit 2 United States Physical Geography Physical Geography U.S. extends from the Atlantic to Pacific U.S. is the 3rd largest country U.S. has fertile soils, vast forests, and variety of minerals All major

More information

Pages 63 Monday May 01, 2017

Pages 63 Monday May 01, 2017 Pages 6 Notebook check: Biome basics and A Modern Desert Biome Warm up: Copy the graph below, title it Defining factor a biome: temperature and precipitation Pages 6 an based on regarding Learning scale:

More information

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE HABITAT SUITABILITY ANALYSIS IN GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING, USA Jean Edwards

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE HABITAT SUITABILITY ANALYSIS IN GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING, USA Jean Edwards GREATER SAGE-GROUSE HABITAT SUITABILITY ANALYSIS IN GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING, USA Jean Edwards INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) is a large game bird

More information

GET TO KNO W A NATIO NAL

GET TO KNO W A NATIO NAL Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore GET TO KNO W A NATIO NAL PARK W ITH FIEL DSCO PE Explore one of the

More information

GIS INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL

GIS INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL GIS INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL: BEAVER RESTORATION AND ASSESSMENT TOOL (BRAT) CASE STUDY: ESCALANTE RIVER WATERSHED VERSION 1.0 (RELEASE DATE: JANUARY 21, 2013) Prepared by: WILLIAM W. MACFARLANE, Research Associate

More information

Global Land Cover Mapping

Global Land Cover Mapping Global Land Cover Mapping and its application in SDGs Prof. Chen Jun 1, Dr. He Chaoying 2 1 National Geomatics Center of China (NGCC) 2 Ministry of Natural Resources, P.R.China May 30, 2018, Copenhagen

More information