A GLOBAL SLIDING MODE CONTROL WITH PRE-DETERMINED CONVERGENCE TIME DESIGN FOR REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES IN REENTRY PHASE
|
|
- Clinton Ellis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IAA-AAS-DyCoSS-4 -- A GLOBAL SLIDING MODE CONTROL WITH PRE-DETERMINED CONVERGENCE TIME DESIGN FOR REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES IN REENTRY PHASE L. Wang, Y. Z. Sheng, X. D. Liu, and P. L. Lu INTRODUCTION This paper addresses the robust attitude control problem of reusable launch vehicles (RLV) with parametric uncertainties and external disturbances in reentry phase. Based on the feedback-linearized RLV rotational equations of motion, a global sliding mode control (SMC) strategy with a priori stated convergence time is first proposed, which ensures the global robustness of the controlled system. As compared with the existing sliding mode attitude control method, an improved system performance can be obtained in terms of convergence time and robustness. Then, the steady-state error problem caused by the continuous approximation techniques such as the boundary layer method (which is used to alleviate the control chattering) is considered. A disturbance observer (DO) based global SMC strategy is presented to improve the control accuracy. Finally, the validity of the proposed strategies is verified by both theoretical analysis and simulation results for the attitude control problem of X-33 RLV in reentry phase. Reusable launch vehicles (RLV) are designed to perform multiple missions and to be reusable, which will reduce the cost of access to space dramatically. The whole reentry flight is generally separated into three primary phases: Reentry phase (from point A to B), Terminal Area Energy Management (TAEM) phase (from point B to C), and Approaching and Landing phase (from point C to ground). An illustration of the reentry flight trajectory for a RLV is shown in Figure. The flight control of RLV in reentry phase has attracted considerable interest for its critical position in accomplishing the reentry tasks safely. However, the reentry flight control involves attitude maneuvering through a wide range of flight envelope, and suffers from various kinds of external disturbances and modeling uncertainties. These, together with the facts that RLV are characterized by its poorly understood aerodynamic qualities, high nonlinearity and coupling characteristics in both attitude dynamics and kinematics, increase the complexity of the attitude control design. Therefore, in order to achieve accurate and rapid attitude tracking, nonlinear robust control techniques are more suitable than linear control methods, e.g., gain scheduling. Ph.D candidate, School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, and School of Automation, 3 staff, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 8, P. R. China. nicholas33@bit.edu.cn Lecturer, School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, and School of Automation, 3 staff, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 8, P. R. China. Lecturer, School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, and School of Automation, 3 staff, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 8, P. R. China. Professor, School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, and School of Automation, 3 staff, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 8, P. R. China.
2 Figure. Example reentry flight trajectory for a RLV Sliding mode control (SMC), as one of effective robust control algorithms, has been widely used in the reentry attitude controller design due to its attractive features such as easy implementation, insensitivity to parametric uncertainty and external disturbance satisfying the matching condition, and fast dynamic response., 3, 4 In References, 3 and 4, time-scale separation principle and conventional SMC strategy (i.e., the phase plane trajectory of controlled system consists of two parts: the reaching phase and the sliding phase) are combined to develop the attitude controller. Due to the u- tilization of the conventional SMC strategy, the resultant controller can only ensure the asymptotical convergence of tracking errors. The controlled system is still sensitive to the matched lumped uncertainties (including parametric uncertainties and external disturbances) during the reaching phase. Moreover, as reported in Reference 5, the adoption of time-scale separation introduces modeling errors because of the original coupling characteristic of the rotational dynamics and kinematics. In this paper, the robust attitude control problem of RLV in the reentry phase is addressed. As in Reference 5, feedback linearization (FBL) approach is first adopted to handle the inherent nonlinearity and coupling lying in the rotational dynamics and kinematics, by which the use of time-scale separation principle is avoided. Then, by appropriately designing the sliding surface, a global SMC strategy with pre-determined convergence time is developed based on the the feedback-linearized reentry attitude control problem, which eliminates the reaching phase and achieves the global robustness. As a result, the proposed control is superior to the preceding SMC based attitude controller, 3, 4 in terms of convergence time and robustness. Furthermore, the global chattering problem existing in the proposed algorithm is considered. To reduce the steady-state error caused by the continuous approximation techniques such as the boundary layer method, a composite scheme, namely disturbance observer (DO) based global SMC algorithm, is further presented. By incorporating the disturbance observer into the related control design, a more precise tracking performance will be achieved. The effectiveness of the proposed attitude control schemes is verified through the application of them to the attitude control problem of X-33 RLV in reentry phase.
3 PRELIMINARIES Mathematical Model This paper considers the attitude control problem of an unpowered, lifting-body atmospheric RLV in reentry phase. The related rotational equations of motion (i.e., attitude dynamics and kinematics) are described as: 5, 6 I ω + ω Iω = M + M d () Ω = R(Ω)ω + f () where I is the symmetric positive definite inertia matrix and is defined as I xx I xz I = I yy I xz I zz ω = [p, q, r] T is the angular rate vector with p, q, r being the roll, pitch, and yaw rates respectively, the superscript ( ) denotes the skew-symmetric matrix operator on any vector a = [a, a, a 3 ] T such that a 3 a a = a 3 a a a M = [M x, M y, M z ] T is the vector of control moment with M x, M y and M z being the roll, pitch, and yaw moments respectively, M d R 3 denotes the vector of bounded external disturbance moment. Ω = [α, β, µ] T is the aerodynamic angle vector defined as angle of attack, sideslip angle, and bank angle respectively, R(Ω) R 3 3 is defined by: cos α tan β sin α tan β R(Ω) = sin α cos α cos α cos β sin β sin α cos β f = [ f, f, f 3 ] T denotes unknown but bounded smooth vector-function, which is mainly caused by the model simplification procedure. 6 Moreover, the uncertainty on the inertia matrix is taken into account, i.e., I = I + I with I being the nominal inertia matrix and I being the unknown but bounded inertia variation. Based on the above discussion, Eq. () can be rewritten as I ω = ω I ω + M + d (3) where d = I ω ω Iω + M d. It is assumed that d is bounded. For clarity, related arguments of various functions are be ignored in the following content. Feedback Linearization Choosing the control moments M x, M y, M z and the aerodynamics angles α, β, µ as the control inputs and the outputs respectively, the attitude kinematics and dynamics described by Eqs. () and (3) can be expressed as: ẋ = f(x) + 3 g i (x)u i + d i= (4) y i = h i (x), i =,, 3. 3
4 where x = [p, q, r, α, β, µ] T is the state vector, M = [u, u, u 3 ] T = [M x, M y, M z ] T and y = [y, y, y 3 ] T = [h, h, h 3 ] T = [α, β, µ] T denote the vectors of control input and output respectively, and f (x) f (x) f(x) = f 3 (x) f 4 (x) = f 5 (x) f 6 (x) (I xx I yy +I zz )I xz I pq + (I yy I zz )I zz I xz I qr I xz I yy (r p ) + I zz I xx I yy pr pq + ( I xx+i yy I zz )I xz I qr, p cos α tan β + q r sin α tan β p sin α r cos α p cos α cos β q sin β r sin α cos β (I xx I yy )I xx +Ixz I g (x) = [ I zz I,, I xz I,,, ]T, g (x) = [,,,,, ] T, g 3 (x) = [ I xz I yy I,, I xx,,, ]T I with I = I xx I zz I xz. d = [(I d)t, f T ] T R 6 denotes the system uncertain term. When the FBL technique is applied to Eq. (4), each output y i needs to be differentiated a sufficient number of times until a control input u i appears in the resulting equation. After differentiating each output y i twice, the output dynamics for y is described by ÿ L f ÿ h L g L f h L g L f h L g3 L f h = L f h + L g L f h L g L f h L g3 L f h M + v ÿ 3 L f h 3 L g L f h 3 L g L f h 3 L g3 L f h 3 }{{}}{{} F E =F + EM + v where v = [ v, v, v 3 ] T = RI d + f stands for the lumped uncertainty resulting from the FBL procedure. As the external disturbance, inertia matrix variation and system states are all bounded, it is assumed that v is bounded by an upper bound, i.e., there exists a constant v max R +, such that v < v max with being the vector infinity norm. In view of Eq. (5), the vector relative degree of system (4) is [,, ], and hence the total relative degree (i.e., + + = 6) equals to the order of the system. Moreover, since the sideslip angle β is kept close to during reentry, det(e) = cos β sin β tan β I I yy I I yy I I yy. Therefore, system (4) can be linearized completely without zero dynamics. 7 Define the feedback control law as M = E ( F + v) (6) with v = [v, v, v 3 ] T being the auxiliary control input. Then, by substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (5), the output dynamics of system (4) is transformed into the following decoupled integrator form: (5) ÿ = v + v (7) It should be noted that Eq. (7) can be viewed as three decoupled second-order system and each output y i, i =,, 3, is independently controlled by the corresponding input v i. 4
5 Problem Statement In this paper, the general control design goal is to determine the control moment vector M such that the commanded aerodynamic angle profiles y c = [α c, β c, µ c ] T are robustly tracked with predetermined convergence time in the presence of bounded parametric uncertainties (i.e., inertia variations I), model simplification errors f, and external disturbance torques M d. In the sequel, the proposed global SMC laws are firstly designed in terms of the auxiliary control v, then the control moment M is obtained through Eq. (6). Specifically, the attitude control problem during reentry is to determine the control input v in the global SMC framework for the resultant FBL model in Eq. (7), such that the output vector y tracks the commanded aerodynamic angle profiles y c in finite time. That is, lim e = lim (y y c ) = (8) t t f t tf where e = y y c = [e, e, e 3 ] T is the vector of tracking error, and t f is the pre-determined convergence time. The functional diagram of the proposed global SMC-FBL attitude control design is presented in Figure. Parametric Uncertainties/External Disturbances Attitude Controller Commanded Aerodynamic Angle Profiles Global SMC Strategy FBL Flight States RLV model Figure. Diagram of the global SMC-FBL attitude control design MAIN RESULTS Global SMC Design Based on the FBL model in Eq. (7), a global SMC strategy with pre-determined convergence time is developed in this subsection. Firstly, a novel sliding function S = [s, s, s 3 ] T is designed as S = (ė P (t)) + K(e P (t)) (9) where K = diag(k, k, k 3 ) with its element k i, i =,, 3, being positive constant, P (t) = diag(p (t), p (t), p 3 (t)) with p i (t), i =,, 3, satisfying the following assumption in order to ensure the finite time convergence of the tracking errors. Assumption. The function p i (t), i =,, 3, is finite in interval [, t f ] and satisfies: ) p i (t) C [, ], ṗ i (t), p i (t) L, where C [, ) denotes the set of all rank differentiable continuous functions defined in [, ), and L indicates that the set of all bounded functions in [, ); 5
6 ) p i () = e i () and ṗ i () = ė i () to ensure s i () = ; 3) p i (t) = ṗ i (t) = p i (t) = when t t f. Then, a control law that makes the sliding surface in Eq. (9) attractive should be designed. To this end, the control law is given by v = ÿ c + P (t) K(ė P (t)) ηsgn(s) () where η = diag(η, η, η 3 ) is the switching gain matrix with its elements η i depending on v max, e.g., η i = v max + δ with δ being a small positive constant, sgn( ) is the vector sign function and sgn(s) = [sgn(s ), sgn(s ), sgn(s 3 )] T. Theorem. Suppose that the Assumption is satisfied. Then, for the feedback-linearized attitude control problem of RLV described in Eq. (7), by adopting the sliding surface function defined in Eq. (9) and the corresponding control law in Eq. (), a global sliding mode is achieved. Moreover, the attitude tracking error e is driven to zero at the pre-determined convergence time t f. Proof. Consider the Lyapunov function candidate By taking the time derivative of V, one gets V = ST S () V =S T Ṡ =S T [(ë P (t)) + K(ė P )] =S T [v + v ÿ c P (t) + K(ė P )] () Substituting the control law () into Eq. () yields V =S T ( ηsgn(s) + v) 3 ( η i s i + v s i ) i= 3 ( η i s i + v max s i ) i= δ 3 s i i= (3) Clearly, for any S(t) R 3, V is non-positive and hence V (t) V (). In view of the definition of the sliding surface in Eq. (9) and the Assumption, the initial value of S is zero (i.e., S() = ), which result in V () =. Then, one gets V. On the other hand, it is obvious that V for any S(t) R 3 according to Eq. (). Consequently, it is easy to conclude that V, which implies that S(t), t [, ). That is, a global sliding mode is achieved. Based on the above discussion, S(t) = (ė P (t)) + K(e P (t)) is satisfied for all t [, ). Since the initial values of e P (t) and ė P (t) are both equal to zero according to Assumption, it can be easily concluded that e P (t) = ė P (t) = for all t [, ) provided that the elements of K are positive constants. Therefore, the tracking error e and its derivative ė will both be driven to zero at the previously stated time t f as p i (t) = ṗ i (t) = for t t f. 6
7 Remark. It should be pointed out that the proposed sliding surface in Eq. (9) is similar to that in Reference 8. However, there exists large discontinuity (jump) in the control moments when the control algorithm in Reference 8 is used. To avoid this problem, virtual control is introduced in Reference 8, and consequently robust exact finite time convergent differentiator 9 has to be incorporated into the related control design to estimate the missing derivatives of system states. In this paper, the control discontinuity problem is solved by simply adding the condition p i (t t f ) = as shown in the Assumption, which is simpler and more effective than the way used in Reference 8. Remark. With respect to the selection of the function p i (t), i =,, 3, any functions that satisfy Assumption can be adopted. One possible choice of p i (t) is given by: { a 4i t 4 + a 3i t 3 + a i t + a i t + a i t < t f p i (t) =, (4) t t f whose parameters a i, a i, a i, a 3i and a 4i can be determined according to Assumption. Specifically, a i = e i (), a i = ė i (), a i = 3ė i()t f 6e i () t, f DO based Global SMC Design a 3i = 3ė i()t f + 8e i () t 3 f, a 4i = ė i()t f 3e i () t 4. f In real implementation, the discontinuous control laws given in Eq. () may result in control chattering due to imperfections in switching devices. Moreover, due to the global sliding phase feature of the proposed control strategy, the chattering phenomenon exists from the very beginning of the control action. To alleviate the chattering phenomenon, boundary layer technique is used to give a continuous approximation of the discontinuous sign function sgn( ). That is, replace the sign function sgn( ) in Eq. () by saturation function sat(s) = [sat(s ), sat(s ), sat(s 3 )] T, which is defined as follows: sat(s i ) = { si κ i if s i κ i, i =,, 3, (5) sgn(s i ) if s i > κ i where κ i R + denotes the boundary layer thickness. In such a case, the tracking error e will not converge to zero in finite time but rather can only be expected to converge into some small vicinity of the origin depending on the boundary layer thickness κ i in finite time. As a result, the chattering is reduced at the cost of degraded control accuracy and robustness. In order to enhance the control accuracy and system robustness, a DO based global SMC strategy is developed in this subsection, whose structure is illustrated in Figure 3. z is the estimate of the lumped uncertainty v and will be determined below. In the sequel, the following assumption is needed. Assumption. The variables S, v, ÿ c and ė are assumed to be bounded and Lebesgue-measurable respectively, the lumped uncertainty v is times differentiable and bounded, i.e., there exists a constant l i, i =,, 3 such that v i l i. Based on Assumption, the structure of the adopted DO is given in the following lemma. 7
8 Parametric Uncertainties/External Disturbances Attitude Controller Commanded Aerodynamic Angle Profiles DO based Global SMC Strategy FBL Flight States DO RLV model Figure 3. Structure of the DO based global SMC strategy Lemma. 9,, Consider the following DO: ż =χ + v ÿ c p(t) + K(ė ṗ(t)), z s /3 sgn(z s ) χ = γ L /3 z s /3 sgn(z s ) + z, z 3 s 3 /3 sgn(z 3 s 3 ) ż =χ, z χ / sgn(z χ ) χ = γ L / z χ / sgn(z χ ) + z, z 3 χ 3 / sgn(z 3 χ 3 ) sgn(z χ ) ż = γ 3 L sgn(z χ ), sgn(z 3 χ 3 ) (6) where z = [z, z, z 3 ] T, z = [z, z, z 3 ] T, z = [z, z, z 3 ] T, χ = [χ, χ, χ 3 ] T, χ = [χ, χ, χ 3 ] T, γ, γ, γ 3 and L = diag(l, l, l 3 ) are the design parameters of the observer (7). Supposing that Assumption is satisfied and the related parameters l i, γ i, i =,, 3, are chosen properly (e.g., γ i can be chosen recursively as suggested in Reference 9), then in the absence of measurement noise the following equalities are established in finite time: z = S, z = v, z = Proof. The proof is omitted, which is similar to References and. v. (7) According to structure of the DO based global SMC strategy shown in Figure 3, the DO based global SMC algorithm is designed as v = ÿ c + P (t) K(ė P (t)) ηsgn(s) z (8) Where η is selected the same as that in Eq. (), and z is obtained from Eq. (6). 8
9 The closed-loop stability under the DO based global SMC algorithm (8) can be easily proved as the DO is finite-time convergent. Therefore, the proofs is omitted here and next we will focus on the study of the behavior inside the boundary layer of both the global SMC and DO based global SMC algorithms to show the improvement of the DO based global algorithm in control accuracy. For the DO based global SMC algorithm, the time derivative of the sliding function in Eq. (9) is given by Ṡ = ηκ S + v z (9) where κ = diag(κ, κ, κ 3 ). On the other hand, the time derivative of the sliding function (9) controlled by the global SMC algorithm is described as Ṡ = ηκ S + v () Denote the static value of S controlled by the DO based global SMC and the global SMC algorithms as S d and S o, respectively. Then, by letting Ṡ = in Eqs. (9) and (), one gets { S d = η κ( v z ) S o = η κ v () From Eq. (), it is obvious that the static value of S controlled by the DO based global SMC algorithm is much smaller than the global SMC algorithm after the convergence of the DO. In view of the definition of S, small value of S implies a more precise tracking accuracy is achieved. Consequently, an improvement in control accuracy can be provided by the DO based global SMC algorithm. SIMULATION RESULTS Reference Reentry Trajectory Design To achieve the reentry flight of RLV, the Radau Pseudospectral Method (RPM) is used to generate a feasible reference reentry trajectory, in which the used equations of the motion are given by ḣ =V sin γ V cos γ sin χ ϕ = (h + R e ) cos χ V θ = cos γ cos χ (h + R e ) V = D m g sin γ, () γ = mv [L cos µ m(g V ) cos γ] (h + R e ) χ = L sin µ mv cos γ + V cos γ sin χ tan θ (h + R e ) where h is the altitude, ϕ is the latitude, θ is the longitude, V is the velocity, γ is the flight path angle, χ is the heading angle, R e is the radius of earth, g = µ /(h + R e ) is the inverse-square 9
10 gravitational acceleration with µ = (ft 3 /s ), L and D denote the lift and drag forces, respectively, which are given by L = ˆqS ref C L (α), D = ˆqS ref C D (α), where S ref denotes the reference area, and ˆq = ρv denotes the dynamic pressure with ρ being the atmospheric density. The detailed expressions of ρ, C L (α) and C D (α) can be found in Reference 3. When the reentry trajectory design target is set to maximize the cross range, the objective of trajectory design is then to find a control history u = [α, µ] T that minimizes the following cost function: J = θ f. (3) subject to the dynamic model given by Eq.(). For achieving this aim, the initial and final conditions are specified as: (h, ϕ, θ, V, γ, χ ) = (6 ft, deg, deg, 56 (ft/s), deg, 9 deg), (h f, V f, γ f ) = (8 ft, 5 (ft/s), 5 deg). (4) where the subscripts and f are the initial and final time instant, respectively. Moreover, the path constraints associated with heating-rate Q, dynamic pressure ˆq, and structural load N are given by: Q Cρ n V n (l + l α + l α + l 3 α 3 ) Btu/ft /s ˆq = ρv 8 lb/ft (5) N L + D /(mg).5 where n =.5, n = 3.7, C = Btu s.7 /ft 3.57 /slug.5 and l =.67, l =., l =.6988, l 3 =.93. Figure 4 shows the generated reentry trajectories, corresponding path constraints and aerodynamic angle profiles. It can be seen that the associated path constraints (i.e., heating-rate Q, dynamic pressure ˆq, and structural load N) are all satisfied. Besides, the generated reentry trajectories and the control variables such as angle of attack α and bank angle µ, all have a relatively smooth change. During the reentry phase, the sideslip angle β is kept to zero to prevent the excessive heat buildup. Attitude Control Simulation Results As this paper mainly focuses on the attitude control of RLV in the reentry phase, the aerodynamic angle profiles generated in the preceding subsection is directly used here as the commanded aerodynamic angle profiles to be tracked. In this subsection, numerical simulations are conducted to compare the effectiveness of the proposed strategies for RLV in the presence of parametric uncertainties and external disturbances. The global SMC algorithm in Eq. () and the DO based global SMC algorithm in Eqs. (8) and (6) are applied to the attitude control problem under study for comparison and referred as GSMC, and DO-GSMC for clarity, respectively. In the simulation, the 6-DOF mathematical model given in Reference 4 is used. The initial system states are: the altitude h() = 6 ft (i.e., the initial radial position is h() + R e ),
11 3 x 5 4 h (ft) φ (deg) 5 θ (deg) 3 x 4 5 V (ft/s) γ (deg) 5 χ (deg) 5 Q (Btu/ft /s) α (deg) ˆq (lb/ft ) β (deg) N µ (deg) Figure 4. System behavior of the simulated RLV. The first two rows are for the generated reentry trajectories, the third row is for the corresponding path constraints, and the last row is for the aerodynamic angle profiles
12 the latitude ϕ() = deg, the longitude θ() = deg, the velocity V () = 56 (ft/s), the flight path angle γ() = deg, the heading angle χ() = 9 deg, the aerodynamic angles Ω() = [,, 65] T deg, the angular rate ω() = [,, ] T (deg/s). The nominal inertia matrix of the X-33 RLV during the reentry phase is given by I = 96 (slug ft ), and the uncertainty is introduced into the inertia matrix by about % of the nominal value. Besides, the form of external disturbance considered in the simulation is given by + sin(πt/5) + sin(πt/5) M d = + sin(πt/5) + sin(πt/5) 5 (lb ft), + sin(πt/5) + sin(πt/5) which is added to each axis directly. Table shows the related control parameters. Table. Related control parameters Controllers Parameters GSMC DO-GSMC Sliding function gain: K diag(,, ) diag(,, ) Pre-determined convergence time: t f (s) Control parameter: η diag(,, 3) diag(,, 3) Control parameter: κ i, i =,, 3.,.,..,.,. DO gain: γ i, i =,, 3 Null 8.4, 4.,. DO gain: L Null diag(.3,.3,.) The simulation results are shown in Figures 5 to 8. Figures 5 and 6 depict the time histories of aerodynamic angles tracking, angular rates and control moments controlled by the GSMC and DO-GSMC algorithms respectively, from which it can be seen that both of the controllers have successfully accomplished the attitude tracking. A detailed comparison of the tracking error responses controlled by those two algorithms are shown in Figure 7, where the local curves of the tracking errors are also provided for a better comparison. It can be seen that the tracking errors are all convergence to zero at t = s, which is consistent with the previously stated convergence time t f. Besides, the tracking accuracy controlled by the DO-GSMC algorithm is higher than that controlled by the GSMC algorithm, which verifies the precision improvement of the DO-GSMC algorithm. Figure 8 demonstrates the comparison of the sliding surface responses controlled by those two algorithms, form which it can also be seen that the magnitudes of S in the DO-GSMC is smaller than that of the GSMC algorithm, even the same boundary layer thicknesses are used. CONCLUSION In this paper, a global SMC strategy with a priori stated convergence time has been proposed to achieve the robust attitude control of RLV in the presence of parametric uncertainties and external disturbances in reentry phase. Moreover, in order to address the steady-state error problem caused by the continuous approximation techniques such as the boundary layer method, a DO is
13 5 x 3 α (deg) 5 β (deg) 5 µ (deg) 4 α c α 5 β c β 6 µ c µ p (deg/s) Mx (lb.ft) x 5 q (deg/s) My (lb.ft) x 5 r (deg/s) Mz (lb.ft).5.5 x 4 Figure 5. The system responses controlled by the GSMC algorithm. The first row represents the time histories of aerodynamic angles tracking, the second row corresponds to the angular rate responses, and the third row is for the control moments. 3
14 5 x 3 α (deg) 5 β (deg) 4 µ (deg) 4 α c α 5 6 β c β 8 6 µ c µ p (deg/s) Mx (lb.ft) x 5 My (lb.ft) q (deg/s) 6 4 x 5 3 r (deg/s) Mz (lb.ft).5.5 x 4 Figure 6. The system responses controlled by the DO-GSMC algorithm. The first row represents the time histories of aerodynamic angles tracking, the second row corresponds to the angular rate responses, and the third row is for the control moments. 4
15 e (deg) e (deg) 4 4 GSMC 6 DO GSMC 8 local curve local curve..5 e (deg) e (deg) 5 x 3 local curve local curve..5 e3 (deg) e3 (deg) 5 5 local curve local curve..5 e (deg).5 e (deg).5 e3 (deg) Figure 7. Comparison of tracking errors, where the first row corresponds to the global curves, the second and third rows represents the local curves. 5
16 5 x 3 GSMC DO GSMC s x 3 s x 3 s Figure 8. Comparison of sliding surface responses. further incorporated into the proposed global SMC strategy to improve the tracking accuracy. The effectiveness of the proposed strategies has been verified from both the theoretical analysis and simulation results. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors acknowledge the financial support from Major State Basic Research Development Program [grant number CB7], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 3734], and Innovative Research Team of Beijing Institute of Technology. REFERENCES [] S. D. Ridder and E. Mooj, Terminal area trajectory planning using the energy-tube concept for reusable launch vehicles, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 68,, pp [] Y. Shtessel, J. McDuffie, M. Jackson, C. Hall, M. Gallaher, D. Krupp, and N. D.Hendrix, Sliding mode control of the X-33 vehicle in launch and re-entry modes, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA [3] Y. Shtessel, C. Tournes, and D. Krupp, Reusable launch vehicle control in sliding modes, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA [4] Y. Shtessel, C. Hall, and M. Jackson, Reusable launch vehicle control in multiple-time-scale slding modes, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 3, No. 6,, pp. 3. [5] W. R. V. Soest, Q. P. Chu, and J. A. Mulder, Combined feedback linearization and constrained model predictive control for entry, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 9, No., 6, pp [6] J. J. Recasens, Q. P. Chu, and J. A. Mulder, Robust model predictive control of a feedback linearization system for a lifting-body re-entry vehicle, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA [7] Nonlinear control systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 3nd ed.,
17 [8] B. L. Tian, W. R. Fan, Q. Zong, J. Wang, and F. Wang, Nonlinear robust control fro reusable launch vehicles in reentry phase based on time-varying high order sliding mode, Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 35, 3, pp [9] A. Levant, Higher-order sliding modes, differentiation and output-feedback control, International Journal of Control, Vol. 76, No. 9/, 3, pp [] Y. Shtessel, I. Shkolnikov, and A. Levant, Smooth second-order sliding modes: Missile guidance application, Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 43, 7, pp [] S. Iqbal, C. Edwards, and A. Bhatti, Robust feedback linearization using higher order sliding mode observer, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC), Orlando, FL, USA, -5 December. [] B. L. Tian and Q. Zong, Optimal guidance for reentry vehicle based on indirectlegendre pseudospectral method, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 68,, pp [3] S. Josselyn and I. Ross, Rapid verification method for the trajectory optimization of reentry vehicles, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 3, pp [4] B. L. Tian, Q. Zong, J. Wang, and F. Wang, Quasi-continuous high-order sliding mode controller design for reusable launch vehicles in reentry phase, Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 8, 3, pp [5] K. Bollino, High-fidelity real-time trajectory optimization for reusable launch vehicles, ph.d. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, 6. 7
TERMINAL ATTITUDE-CONSTRAINED GUIDANCE AND CONTROL FOR LUNAR SOFT LANDING
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS2-14 -02-05 TERMINAL ATTITUDE-CONSTRAINED GUIDANCE AND CONTROL FOR LUNAR SOFT LANDING Zheng-Yu Song, Dang-Jun Zhao, and Xin-Guang Lv This work concentrates on a 3-dimensional guidance and
More informationA Novel Finite Time Sliding Mode Control for Robotic Manipulators
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August 24-29, 214 A Novel Finite Time Sliding Mode Control for Robotic Manipulators Yao ZHAO
More informationCHATTERING-FREE SMC WITH UNIDIRECTIONAL AUXILIARY SURFACES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEM WITH STATE CONSTRAINTS. Jian Fu, Qing-Xian Wu and Ze-Hui Mao
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2013 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 9, Number 12, December 2013 pp. 4793 4809 CHATTERING-FREE SMC WITH UNIDIRECTIONAL
More informationINTEGRATED INTERCEPT MISSILE GUIDANCE AND CONTROL WITH TERMINAL ANGLE CONSTRAINT
6th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES INTEGRATED INTERCEPT MISSILE GUIDANCE AND CONTROL WITH TERMINAL ANGLE CONSTRAINT H. S. Shin*, T. W. Hwang**, A. Tsourdos***, B. A. White***, M. J.
More informationChapter 1 Lecture 2. Introduction 2. Topics. Chapter-1
Chapter 1 Lecture 2 Introduction 2 Topics 1.4 Equilibrium of airplane 1.5 Number of equations of motion for airplane in flight 1.5.1 Degrees of freedom 1.5.2 Degrees of freedom for a rigid airplane 1.6
More informationRobot Control Basics CS 685
Robot Control Basics CS 685 Control basics Use some concepts from control theory to understand and learn how to control robots Control Theory general field studies control and understanding of behavior
More informationDesign and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit 15-18 August 25, San Francisco, California AIAA 25-62 Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite
More informationA Model-Free Control System Based on the Sliding Mode Control Method with Applications to Multi-Input-Multi-Output Systems
Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR'17) Toronto, Canada August 21 23, 2017 Paper No. 119 DOI: 10.11159/cdsr17.119 A Model-Free Control System
More informationAutonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective
Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio State University
More informationDynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties Qudrat Khan*, Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,* Qadeer
More informationVisual Feedback Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Micro Satellite using Two Wheels
Visual Feedback Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Micro Satellite using Two Wheels Fuyuto Terui a, Nobutada Sako b, Keisuke Yoshihara c, Toru Yamamoto c, Shinichi Nakasuka b a National Aerospace Laboratory
More informationTRACKING CONTROL VIA ROBUST DYNAMIC SURFACE CONTROL FOR HYPERSONIC VEHICLES WITH INPUT SATURATION AND MISMATCHED UNCERTAINTIES
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 017 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 13, Number 6, December 017 pp. 067 087 TRACKING CONTROL VIA ROBUST DYNAMIC SURFACE
More informationRobust Speed Controller Design for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives Based on Sliding Mode Control
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 88 (2016 ) 867 873 CUE2015-Applied Energy Symposium and Summit 2015: ow carbon cities and urban energy systems Robust Speed Controller
More informationAdaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy
Adaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy Maodeng Li, Wuxing Jing Department of Aerospace Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150001, China
More informationChapter 4 The Equations of Motion
Chapter 4 The Equations of Motion Flight Mechanics and Control AEM 4303 Bérénice Mettler University of Minnesota Feb. 20-27, 2013 (v. 2/26/13) Bérénice Mettler (University of Minnesota) Chapter 4 The Equations
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods in One Framework
Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 4, No. ists3, pp. Pd_5-Pd_, 6 Spacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods in One Framework y Takahiro SASAKI,),
More informationIntroduction to Flight Dynamics
Chapter 1 Introduction to Flight Dynamics Flight dynamics deals principally with the response of aerospace vehicles to perturbations in their flight environments and to control inputs. In order to understand
More informationLecture AC-1. Aircraft Dynamics. Copy right 2003 by Jon at h an H ow
Lecture AC-1 Aircraft Dynamics Copy right 23 by Jon at h an H ow 1 Spring 23 16.61 AC 1 2 Aircraft Dynamics First note that it is possible to develop a very good approximation of a key motion of an aircraft
More informationTrajectory tracking & Path-following control
Cooperative Control of Multiple Robotic Vehicles: Theory and Practice Trajectory tracking & Path-following control EECI Graduate School on Control Supélec, Feb. 21-25, 2011 A word about T Tracking and
More informationThe Role of Zero Dynamics in Aerospace Systems
The Role of Zero Dynamics in Aerospace Systems A Case Study in Control of Hypersonic Vehicles Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University Outline q Issues
More informationMixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies
AAS03-558 Mixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies C. Eugene Skelton II and Christopher D. Hall Department of Aerospace & Ocean Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute
More informationProblem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%)
Problem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%) Consider the kinematic equations: Figure 1: NTNU s research vessel, R/V Gunnerus, and Nomoto model: T ṙ + r = Kδ (1) with T = 22.0 s and K = 0.1 s 1.
More informationRobust Nonlinear Design of Three Axes Missile Autopilot via Feedback Linearization
Robust Nonlinear Design of Three Axes Missile Autopilot via Feedback Linearization Abhijit Das, Ranajit Das and Siddhartha Mukhopadhyay, Amit Patra 1 1 Abstract The nonlinearity and coupling of the missile
More informationRobust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft
Robust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft AER1503 Spacecraft Dynamics and Controls II April 24, 2015 Christopher Au Agenda Introduction Model Formulation Controller Designs Simulation Results 2
More informationResearch Article Smooth Sliding Mode Control and Its Application in Ship Boiler Drum Water Level
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 216 Article ID 8516973 7 pages http://dxdoiorg/11155/216/8516973 Research Article Smooth Sliding Mode Control and Its Application in Ship Boiler Drum Water Level
More informationAdaptive Trim and Trajectory Following for a Tilt-Rotor Tricopter Ahmad Ansari, Anna Prach, and Dennis S. Bernstein
7 American Control Conference Sheraton Seattle Hotel May 4 6, 7, Seattle, USA Adaptive Trim and Trajectory Following for a Tilt-Rotor Tricopter Ahmad Ansari, Anna Prach, and Dennis S. Bernstein Abstract
More informationStabilization of Angular Velocity of Asymmetrical Rigid Body. Using Two Constant Torques
Stabilization of Angular Velocity of Asymmetrical Rigid Body Using Two Constant Torques Hirohisa Kojima Associate Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Tokyo Metropolitan University 6-6, Asahigaoka,
More informationHIGHER ORDER SLIDING MODES AND ARBITRARY-ORDER EXACT ROBUST DIFFERENTIATION
HIGHER ORDER SLIDING MODES AND ARBITRARY-ORDER EXACT ROBUST DIFFERENTIATION A. Levant Institute for Industrial Mathematics, 4/24 Yehuda Ha-Nachtom St., Beer-Sheva 843, Israel Fax: +972-7-232 and E-mail:
More informationMulti-layer Flight Control Synthesis and Analysis of a Small-scale UAV Helicopter
Multi-layer Flight Control Synthesis and Analysis of a Small-scale UAV Helicopter Ali Karimoddini, Guowei Cai, Ben M. Chen, Hai Lin and Tong H. Lee Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering,
More informationAircraft Maneuver Regulation: a Receding Horizon Backstepping Approach
Aircraft Maneuver Regulation: a Receding Horizon Backstepping Approach Giuseppe Notarstefano and Ruggero Frezza Abstract Coordinated flight is a nonholonomic constraint that implies no sideslip of an aircraft.
More informationAgile Missile Controller Based on Adaptive Nonlinear Backstepping Control
Agile Missile Controller Based on Adaptive Nonlinear Backstepping Control Chang-Hun Lee, Tae-Hun Kim and Min-Jea Tahk 3 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology(KAIST), Daejeon, 305-70, Korea
More informationSimultaneous-Perturbation-Stochastic-Approximation Algorithm for Parachute Parameter Estimation
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT Vol. 4, No. 5, September October 005 Simultaneous-Perturbation-Stochastic-Approximation Algorithm for Parachute Parameter Estimation Govindarajan Kothandaraman and Mario A. Rotea Purdue
More informationChapter 9. Nonlinear Design Models. Beard & McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft, Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 9, Slide 1
Chapter 9 Nonlinear Design Models Beard & McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft, Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 9, Slide 1 Architecture Destination, obstacles Waypoints Path Definition Airspeed, Altitude,
More informationModeling the 3-DOF Dynamics of an Electrodynamic Maglev Suspension System with a Passive Sled
Modeling the 3-DOF Dynamics of an Electrodynamic Maglev Suspension System with a Passive Sled Jeroen de Boeij 3, Héctor Gutiérrez *1, Rahul Agarwal 2 and Maarten Steinbuch 3 1 Department of Mechanical
More informationLecture 11 Overview of Flight Dynamics I. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 11 Overview of Flight Dynamics I Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Point Mass Dynamics Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor
More informationInvestigation of the Dynamics and Modeling of a Triangular Quadrotor Configuration
Investigation of the Dynamics and Modeling of a Triangular Quadrotor Configuration TONI AXELSSON Master s Thesis at Aerospace Engineering Supervisor: Arne Karlsson Examiner: Arne Karlsson ISSN 1651-7660
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationRobustness Study for Longitudinal and Lateral Dynamics of RLV with Adaptive Backstepping Controller
Robustness Study for Longitudinal and Lateral Dynamics of RLV with Adaptive Backstepping Controller Anoop P R Department of Electrical and Electronics engineering, TKM college of Engineering,Kollam, India
More informationDynamics and Control of Rotorcraft
Dynamics and Control of Rotorcraft Helicopter Aerodynamics and Dynamics Abhishek Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur February 3, 2018 Overview Flight Dynamics Model
More informationChaos suppression of uncertain gyros in a given finite time
Chin. Phys. B Vol. 1, No. 11 1 1155 Chaos suppression of uncertain gyros in a given finite time Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa a and Hasan Pourmahmood Aghababa bc a Electrical Engineering Department, Urmia
More informationTracking Rigid Body Motion Using Thrusters and Momentum. Wheels
JAS 199 Tracking Rigid Body Motion Using Thrusters and Momentum Wheels Christopher D. Hall, Panagiotis Tsiotras, and Haijun Shen Abstract Tracking control laws are developed for a rigid spacecraft using
More informationAdaptive sliding mode backstepping control for near space vehicles considering engine faults
Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics Vol. 9, No., April 018, pp.343 351 Adaptive sliding mode backstepping control for near space vehicles considering engine faults ZHAO Jing 1,4,6,JIANGBin,XIEFei
More informationA Sliding Mode Control based on Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for the Mobile Manipulator
International Core Journal of Engineering Vol.3 No.6 7 ISSN: 44-895 A Sliding Mode Control based on Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for the Mobile Manipulator Yanna Si Information Engineering College Henan
More informationA Blade Element Approach to Modeling Aerodynamic Flight of an Insect-scale Robot
A Blade Element Approach to Modeling Aerodynamic Flight of an Insect-scale Robot Taylor S. Clawson, Sawyer B. Fuller Robert J. Wood, Silvia Ferrari American Control Conference Seattle, WA May 25, 2016
More informationINNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR Z9 REENTRY
INNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR Z9 REENTRY Gregor Martens*, Elena Vellutini**, Irene Cruciani* *ELV, Corso Garibaldi, 34 Colleferro (Italy) **Aizoon, Viale Città d Europa 681, 144, Roma (Italy) Abstract Large
More informationExperimental Results for Almost Global Asymptotic and Locally Exponential Stabilization of the Natural Equilibria of a 3D Pendulum
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 4-6, 26 WeC2. Experimental Results for Almost Global Asymptotic and Locally Exponential Stabilization of the Natural
More informationATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS2-14-07-02 ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS Ozan Tekinalp, * Omer Atas INTRODUCTION Utilization of solar sails for the de-orbiting of satellites is
More informationRobust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators
Robust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators Marcel Bergerman * Yangsheng Xu +,** Yun-Hui Liu ** * Automation Institute Informatics Technology Center Campinas SP Brazil + The Robotics Institute
More informationA THREE-DIMENSIONAL PREDICTIVE ENTRY GUIDANCE APPROACH
AIAA 2-3959 A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PREDICTIVE ENTRY GUIDANCE APPROACH K. D. Mease andd.t.chen Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 S. Tandon, D.H.Young,
More informationControl of Mobile Robots
Control of Mobile Robots Regulation and trajectory tracking Prof. Luca Bascetta (luca.bascetta@polimi.it) Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria Organization and
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 1 Uncertainty and Lyapunov Redesign Consider the system [1]
More informationHover Control for Helicopter Using Neural Network-Based Model Reference Adaptive Controller
Vol.13 No.1, 217 مجلد 13 العدد 217 1 Hover Control for Helicopter Using Neural Network-Based Model Reference Adaptive Controller Abdul-Basset A. Al-Hussein Electrical Engineering Department Basrah University
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationChapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs
Chapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs This Chapter reviews several flight controller designs for unmanned rotorcraft. 1 Flight control systems have been proposed and tested on a wide
More informationQuaternion-Based Tracking Control Law Design For Tracking Mode
A. M. Elbeltagy Egyptian Armed forces Conference on small satellites. 2016 Logan, Utah, USA Paper objectives Introduction Presentation Agenda Spacecraft combined nonlinear model Proposed RW nonlinear attitude
More informationAB-267 DYNAMICS & CONTROL OF FLEXIBLE AIRCRAFT
FLÁIO SILESTRE DYNAMICS & CONTROL OF FLEXIBLE AIRCRAFT LECTURE NOTES LAGRANGIAN MECHANICS APPLIED TO RIGID-BODY DYNAMICS IMAGE CREDITS: BOEING FLÁIO SILESTRE Introduction Lagrangian Mechanics shall be
More informationCONTROL OF ROBOT CAMERA SYSTEM WITH ACTUATOR S DYNAMICS TO TRACK MOVING OBJECT
Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, V.31, N.3 (2015), 255 265 DOI: 10.15625/1813-9663/31/3/6127 CONTROL OF ROBOT CAMERA SYSTEM WITH ACTUATOR S DYNAMICS TO TRACK MOVING OBJECT NGUYEN TIEN KIEM
More informationSUM-OF-SQUARES BASED STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SKID-TO-TURN MISSILES WITH THREE-LOOP AUTOPILOT
SUM-OF-SQUARES BASED STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SKID-TO-TURN MISSILES WITH THREE-LOOP AUTOPILOT Hyuck-Hoon Kwon*, Min-Won Seo*, Dae-Sung Jang*, and Han-Lim Choi *Department of Aerospace Engineering, KAIST,
More informationLyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched Perturbations
5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December -5, Lyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched
More informationUnit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft without velocity measurement
Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel San Diego, CA, USA, December 3-5, 6 Unit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft
More informationAttitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis
AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, & Dynamics Revised Submission, December, 22 Attitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis Jonathan Lawton Raytheon Systems Inc. Tucson, Arizona 85734 Randal W. Beard
More informationCHAPTER 1. Introduction
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Linear geometric control theory was initiated in the beginning of the 1970 s, see for example, [1, 7]. A good summary of the subject is the book by Wonham [17]. The term geometric
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationResearch Article Robust Adaptive Attitude Control for Airbreathing Hypersonic Vehicle with Attitude Constraints and Propulsive Disturbance
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 215 Article ID 29348 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/1.1155/215/29348 Research Article Robust Adaptive Attitude Control for Airbreathing Hypersonic Vehicle with Attitude
More informationVisual Servoing for a Quadrotor UAV in Target Tracking Applications. Marinela Georgieva Popova
Visual Servoing for a Quadrotor UAV in Target Tracking Applications by Marinela Georgieva Popova A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Graduate
More informationVerified High-Order Optimal Control in Space Flight Dynamics
Verified High-Order Optimal Control in Space Flight Dynamics R. Armellin, P. Di Lizia, F. Bernelli-Zazzera K. Makino and M. Berz Fourth International Workshop on Taylor Methods Boca Raton, December 16
More informationFlight Dynamics and Control
Flight Dynamics and Control Lecture 1: Introduction G. Dimitriadis University of Liege Reference material Lecture Notes Flight Dynamics Principles, M.V. Cook, Arnold, 1997 Fundamentals of Airplane Flight
More informationOptimal Control, Guidance and Estimation. Lecture 16. Overview of Flight Dynamics II. Prof. Radhakant Padhi. Prof. Radhakant Padhi
Optimal Control, Guidance and Estimation Lecture 16 Overview of Flight Dynamics II Prof. Radhakant Padhi Dept. of erospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Point Mass Dynamics Prof.
More informationProblem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3 Problem 4 Total
Name Section THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics Engineering Mechanics 12 Final Exam May 5, 2003 8:00 9:50 am (110 minutes) Problem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3 Problem
More informationAdaptive State Estimation Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2018
Adaptive State Estimation Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 218! Nonlinearity of adaptation! Parameter-adaptive filtering! Test for whiteness of the residual!
More informationSliding Mode Control Strategies for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers
Osaka University March 15, 2018 Sliding Mode Control Strategies for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers Elisabetta Punta CNR-IEIIT, Italy Problem Statement First Case Spacecraft Model Position Dynamics Attitude
More informationEXTREMAL ANALYTICAL CONTROL AND GUIDANCE SOLUTIONS FOR POWERED DESCENT AND PRECISION LANDING. Dilmurat Azimov
EXTREMAL ANALYTICAL CONTROL AND GUIDANCE SOLUTIONS FOR POWERED DESCENT AND PRECISION LANDING Dilmurat Azimov University of Hawaii at Manoa 254 Dole Street, Holmes 22A Phone: (88)-956-2863, E-mail: azimov@hawaii.edu
More informationSATELLITE ATTITUDE TRACKING BY QUATERNION-BASED BACKSTEPPING. Raymond Kristiansen,1 Per Johan Nicklasson,2 Jan Tommy Gravdahl,3
SATELLITE ATTITUDE TRACKING BY QUATERNION-BASED BACKSTEPPING Raymond Kristiansen,1 Per Johan Nicklasson,2 Jan Tommy Gravdahl,3 Department of Space Technology Narvik University College, Norway Department
More informationDisturbance observer based sliding mode control for unmanned helicopter hovering operations in presence of external disturbances
Disturbance observer based sliding mode control for unmanned helicopter hovering operations in presence of external disturbances Ihsan ULLAH 1,2,3, Hai-Long PEI*,1,2,3 *Corresponding author 1 Key Lab of
More informationA. LEVANT School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel,
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO HIGH-ORDER SLIDING MODES A. LEVANT School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel, 2002-2003 1.1 Introduction One of the most important control problems is control
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationPERIODIC signals are commonly experienced in industrial
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 15, NO. 2, MARCH 2007 369 Repetitive Learning Control of Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems Using Quasi-Sliding Mode Xiao-Dong Li, Tommy W. S. Chow,
More informationMCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II
MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II Reading: SHV Ch.8 Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE647 p.1/14 Robust vs. Adaptive
More informationTTK4190 Guidance and Control Exam Suggested Solution Spring 2011
TTK4190 Guidance and Control Exam Suggested Solution Spring 011 Problem 1 A) The weight and buoyancy of the vehicle can be found as follows: W = mg = 15 9.81 = 16.3 N (1) B = 106 4 ( ) 0.6 3 3 π 9.81 =
More information28TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES
8 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF O THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES AUTOPILOT DESIGN FOR AN AGILE MISSILE USING L ADAPTIVE BACKSTEPPING CONTROL Chang-Hun Lee*, Min-Jea Tahk* **, and Byung-Eul Jun*** *KAIST, **KAIST,
More informationInput Constraints Sliding Mode Control Based on RBF Network Compensation Mengya Hou 1,a, Huanqiang Chen 2,b
International Conference on Information Sciences, Machinery, Materials and Energy (ICISMME 5) Input Constraints Sliding Mode Control Based on RBF Network Compensation Mengya Hou,a, Huanqiang Chen,b Jiangxi
More informationA sub-optimal second order sliding mode controller for systems with saturating actuators
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 28 FrB2.5 A sub-optimal second order sliding mode for systems with saturating actuators Antonella Ferrara and Matteo
More informationGUIDANCE AND CONTROL FOR D-SEND#2
GUIDANCE AND CONTROL FOR D-SEND#2 Jun ichiro Kawaguchi, Tetsujiro Ninomiya, Hirokazu Suzuki Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency kawaguchi.junichiroh@jaxa.jp; ninomiya.tetsujiro@jaxa.jp; suzuki.hirokazu@jaxa.jp
More informationFLIGHT DYNAMICS ANALYSIS AND BASIC STABILIZATION STUDY IN EARLY DESIGN STAGES OF THE SAGITTA DEMONSTRATOR UAV
DocumentID: 89 FLIGHT DYNAMICS ANALYSIS AND BASIC STABILIZATION STUDY IN EARLY DESIGN STAGES OF THE SAGITTA DEMONSTRATOR UAV M. Geiser and M. Heller Institute for Advanced Study, Technische Universität
More informationSTABILIZATION FOR A CLASS OF UNCERTAIN MULTI-TIME DELAYS SYSTEM USING SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER. Received April 2010; revised August 2010
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2011 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 7, Number 7(B), July 2011 pp. 4195 4205 STABILIZATION FOR A CLASS OF UNCERTAIN MULTI-TIME
More informationELECTRODYNAMIC magnetic suspension systems (EDS
460 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 41, NO. 1, JANUARY 2005 Mathematical Model of the 5-DOF Sled Dynamics of an Electrodynamic Maglev System With a Passive Sled Jeroen de Boeij, Maarten Steinbuch,
More informationNonlinear Adaptive Flight Control for the X-38 Vehicle
Nonlinear Adaptive Flight Control for the X-38 Vehicle Elmar M. Wallner and Klaus H. Well Institute of Flight Mechanics and Control University of Stuttgart Pfaffenwaldring 7a, 7569 Stuttgart, Germany klaus.well@ifr.uni-stuttgart.de
More informationNonlinear Landing Control for Quadrotor UAVs
Nonlinear Landing Control for Quadrotor UAVs Holger Voos University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten, Mobile Robotics Lab, D-88241 Weingarten Abstract. Quadrotor UAVs are one of the most preferred
More informationRESEARCH ON TRACKING AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEMS
Computing and Informatics, Vol. 3, 13, 193 1311 RESEARCH ON TRACKING AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEMS Junwei Lei, Hongchao Zhao, Jinyong Yu Zuoe Fan, Heng Li, Kehua Li Naval Aeronautical
More informationMEMS Gyroscope Control Systems for Direct Angle Measurements
MEMS Gyroscope Control Systems for Direct Angle Measurements Chien-Yu Chi Mechanical Engineering National Chiao Tung University Hsin-Chu, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 3 Email: chienyu.me93g@nctu.edu.tw Tsung-Lin Chen
More informationAn Evaluation of UAV Path Following Algorithms
213 European Control Conference (ECC) July 17-19, 213, Zürich, Switzerland. An Evaluation of UAV Following Algorithms P.B. Sujit, Srikanth Saripalli, J.B. Sousa Abstract following is the simplest desired
More informationON CHATTERING-FREE DISCRETE-TIME SLIDING MODE CONTROL DESIGN. Seung-Hi Lee
ON CHATTERING-FREE DISCRETE-TIME SLIDING MODE CONTROL DESIGN Seung-Hi Lee Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Suwon, KOREA shl@saitsamsungcokr Abstract: A sliding mode control method is presented
More informationParachute Dynamic Stability and the Effects of Apparent Inertia
Parachute Dynamic Stability and the Effects of Apparent Inertia Jason M. Ginn Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 333 Ian G. Clark Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
More informationAerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Science and Technology 77 218 49 418 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aerospace Science and Technology www.elsevier.com/locate/aescte Two-degree-of-freedom attitude tracking control
More informationQUATERNION FEEDBACK ATTITUDE CONTROL DESIGN: A NONLINEAR H APPROACH
Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 406-4, September 003 406 Brief Paper QUAERNION FEEDBACK AIUDE CONROL DESIGN: A NONLINEAR H APPROACH Long-Life Show, Jyh-Ching Juang, Ying-Wen Jan, and Chen-zung
More informationLectures 25 & 26: Consensus and vehicular formation problems
EE 8235: Lectures 25 & 26 Lectures 25 & 26: Consensus and vehicular formation problems Consensus Make subsystems (agents, nodes) reach agreement Distributed decision making Vehicular formations How does
More informationNear-Hover Dynamics and Attitude Stabilization of an Insect Model
21 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July 2, 21 WeA1.4 Near-Hover Dynamics and Attitude Stabilization of an Insect Model B. Cheng and X. Deng Abstract In this paper,
More informationElectronic Throttle Valve Control Design Based on Sliding Mode Perturbation Estimator
on Sliding Mode Perturbation Estimator Asst. Prof. Dr. Shibly Ahmed Al-Samarraie, Lect. Yasir Khudhair Al-Nadawi, Mustafa Hussein Mishary, Muntadher Mohammed Salih Control & Systems Engineering Department,
More informationCHATTERING REDUCTION OF SLIDING MODE CONTROL BY LOW-PASS FILTERING THE CONTROL SIGNAL
Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 392 398, May 2010 Published online 25 February 2010 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/asjc.195 CHATTERING REDUCTION OF SLIDING
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More information