Lecture 5. The Lorentz Transformation
|
|
- Georgia Norton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lecture 5 The Lorentz Transformation We have learned so far about how rates of time vary in different IRFs in motion with respect to each other and also how lengths appear shorter when in motion. What we want to do now is to develop a set of equations that will explicitly relate events in one IRF to a second IRF. This will allow us to quantify more complex events between uniformly moving frames. The Galilean Transformation Before proceeding to the relativistic transformation we review the classical, Galilean, transformations for two reference frames in motion with respect to each other. In both the following and the relativistic scenario we will deal with references frames that are in the standard configuration, that is, the origins coincide at time t = t = 0 and all axes are collinear (x is collinear with x, y with y, and z and z ). Two reference frames, S and S, are in relative motion at constant velocity. From the perspective of frame S, frame S moves in the positive x direction at speed v. (This same scenario will be used for the relativistic derivation). First, the perpendicular directions, y and z, are unaffected by the relative motion since the two frames are at rest with respect to each other along these directions. Thus, we have that y = y and z = z. In classical physics there is a universal time that ticks at the same rate for all observers. Thus in standard configuration we have t = t. For the remaining relation we consider an event, 1, in frame S given by the coordinates (x, y, z, t ). At the time t = t = 0, the position of x and x coincide and as the frame S moves off to the right the origin is measured to be at position x = vt when the event occurs and additional displacement is that observed at time t = 0, i.e. x. Thus when event 1 occurs the position as measured by S is x = x + vt. To complete the connection we note that t = t and this yields the Galilean transformation equations: x = x + vt y = y z = z t = t Thus given a point in the frame S these equations will give the position in S if the frames are in standard configuration (if they are not it is easy to translate the two frames). If we have the inverse scenario given a point in S and want to find it in frame S, we use the inverse Galilean transformation. This is easily found by setting v to v in the above equations and switching primed and unprimed coordinates: x = x - vt y = y z = z t = t Now that the classical result is understood we proceed to the relativistic case. The Lorentz Transformation The problem is the following, given a point in frame S, specified by the coordinates x and t, how does this point map into the frame S. That is, what are the coordinates; x(t,x ) and t(t,x )? (Again noting that perpendicular coordinates are unaffected, y = y, z = z ). To begin, we will examine a spacetime diagram representing the question at hand in frames S (on the left) and S (on the right). The goal is to express the point P, where we are given the x and ct coordinates, in the S frame. 1
2 2 EPGY Special and General Relativity
3 Combining these results we have the full Lorentz transformation, x = (x + vt ) y = y The Lorentz Transformation z = z (given point in S, these give the point in S) t = (t + vx /c 2 ) And just as before, the inverse transformation (if given a point in S) is found by setting v = -v. x = (x - vt) y = y The Inverse Lorentz Transformation z = z (given point in S, these give the point in S ) t = (t - vx/c 2 ) To Boldly Go Where No Object Can Ever Go. You are no doubt familiar with the old television and movie series Star Trek in which the starship Enterprise hurtles through space at speeds far exceeding that of light. We now want to show why this will always remain purely fiction unless we give up a basic philosophical tenet concerning cause and effect. There are several hints we ve already seen telling us that c is the highest speed that can be achieved by anything. Lets examine these results. We saw that time is observed to pass more slowly for moving objects, Explicitly t = t, and if an object travels at c with respect to frame S we see that time appears to stop for the moving object t = t =. It takes an infinite amount of time for the moving clock to tick. Now what happens if v > c? Well then, = 1 v2 c 2 1/ 2 = 1 v 2 c 1 2 1/2, v 2 c 2 > 1 the factor g becomes imaginary. Imaginary numbers can not represent real physical quantities so that t ~ i has no meaning. Similarly the observed length becomes imaginary as well. So we see that special relativity can not incorporate objects which move faster than light. This does not forbid objects traveling faster than c but just says that the theory of special relativity can not describe them. Such objects are called tachyons. In order to prove that objects can t move faster than light we will have to show that it would cause problems. To do this lets devise another gedankenexperiment, this one is a pretty farcical one but will prove the point. (See Box L-1 of your text to see an equivalent scenario involving a Star Trek theme). Our gedankenexperiment posits a alien race of beings who are very large and inhabit deep space. They also enjoy sports, especially American Football which they ve picked up on broadcasts. Owing to their immense size, they have developed their own version with some modifications. First, the size of the playing field is 4 light years long. They also require a large number of referees to establish reference frames to view the action. These creatures all travel 3
4 and throw the ball at speeds less than the speed of light. One year a young recruit is drafted for one of the teams as a quarterback. He is a very talented player who can throw the football at speeds faster than light, up to 3c. Thinking this will ensure an easy route to the Universe Bowl the team pays the young recruit lots of money. However, on his first play from scrimmage there is a problem, and the young recruit never manages to score a touchdown and becomes washed up within the first year. Let s see if we can determine why he is forced out. Let s examine one play where this team is at the 0 ly line. The young gun receives the hike of the ball, waits an appropriate amount of time, and then hurtles a bomb to the streaking receiver who runs at 0.6 c. The receiver catches the ball at the 3 ly line, runs into the end-zone and scores. The team celebrates until they see one referee throw a flag indicating a penalty. The referee states that more than one ball was used in the play, a 1 ly penalty, in this case, half the distance to the goal. To analyze this play let s plot the worldlines of the quarterback, the receiver, and the ball. Also, let s determine beforehand what the value of the dilation factor will be for the reference frames of the quarterback and the receiver, = 1 = = Let s plot the events in the quarterback s frame. Let s list the events in both frames via the Lorentz transformation equations, QB WR x(ly) t(y) x (ly) t (y) Start of play: Throw ball: Catch ball: With these values we can now plot the play in the wide receiver s frame. Notice the worldline of the football. It travels backwards in this frame! Notice at time t = -0.5 y there are 3 balls! For this is after the catch in the WR frame, before the QB throws the ball, AND the ball is en route to the receiver. 4
5 Notice that to make a call on this play, there needs to be a series of referees all running at the same speed as the receiver. Each referee sees a ball near him, and when they later confer they all say that the ball was in front of them at one particular time. This violates conservation of energy, (there are now 3 balls in existence in this frame as opposed to one in the QB frame). This also violates causality, the result (the WR catching the ball), occurs before the QB throws it. Imagine if this was some kind of gun which shot bullets which traveled faster than c. The WR would get shot before the gun was fired in one frame and after in another. Cause and effect no longer holds. Hence, to preserve causality, no thing (not even information), can travel faster than c. Spacetime Maps In a previous lecture we examined objects traveling faster than c by viewing events in different reference frames. Now we are going to examine spacetime maps in more detail. What we will find is a new, easy, way to examine events in many different reference frames. This method will also display the strange hyperbolic geometry of Lorentz spacetime. To begin, we go back to the example of the rocket ship moving at 0.4c with the light clock in it. Remember that in the rocket frame the emission and absorption of a light pulse occurs at the same spatial location. In the laboratory frame we concluded that the time must run slower in the rocket because of the path traced out by the light pulse is longer. We show the two spacetime diagrams here and remind you that the interval between the two events is the same. 5
6 Alice s frame s 2 = 1m 2 = (ct) 2 (x) 2 =(ct) 2 [1 (x)2 (ct) 2 ] Bob s frame s 2 = 1m 2 = (ct ') 2 = c 2 (3.3ns) 2 =(ct) 2 [1 v2 c ] = 2 (ct) (t) 2 =c 2 (3.6 ns) 2 Now consider a third frame, the super rocket frame, which is traveling in the same direction as the rocket but at 0.8c. In this frame the light pulse of the rocket and laboratory will move in the opposite direction. This being an IRF as well, the interval between these two events (emission and absorption) will be the same. We plot this frame as well. s 2 = 1m 2 = (ct '') 2 (x'') 2 =(ct '') 2 [1 v sr 2 c 2 ] = (ct '') (t '') 2 =c 2 (5.6 ns) 2 By placing these three diagrams within one diagram, since they have the same origin, we begin to notice a pattern, 6
7 We can also plot these events in any other IRF we can think of which moves along the x axis and shares the same origin. Again the interval is 1 m in all of these, By filling these in a line emerges, This line traces out all points which have the interval equaling 1 m with respect to the origin. This line is in the shape of, (the upper half), a hyperbola. The equation for a hyperbola is a 2 = x 2 y 2, where a is the point of closest approach to the origin. (To compare a 2 = x 2 + y 2 is the equation of a circle and 1 = x 2 /a 2 + y 2 /b 2 is the equation for an ellipse). 7
8 What we see is that to describe two events in any frame we can draw the invariant hyperbola to find the interval or event in any other IRF. This plot tells us is what the (x,t) event location will be in various frames. Note that the frame in which the two events occur in the same place, the proper frame, has the shortest time interval between two events. In all other frames, clocks appear to run slower, giving a larger time interval. Just to be complete, if all of these frames are coincident at the reception of the light pulse we could describe these events in all frames using the lower branch of the hyperbola. Now we want to discuss worldlines in more detail. We will stick to objects moving in one dimension for simplicity. Note that at no time does the particle go beyond 45 degrees of slope, that would correspond to faster than light travel. We examine now our light clock traveling in spacetime starting at the origin, heading out some distance, and then returning to the x = 0 point. This is similar to the discussion of the twin paradox before, but now we want to go into more detail about the proper time indicated on the light clock. Each mark indicates one roundtrip of a light pulse for each light clock. In the laboratory frame, the interval between events (two receptions) in the rocket can be found easily as s 2 = (ct ) 2 (x) 2. But since the two events occur at the same place in the rocket we see that this interval is the same as the proper time measured by the rocket s light clock, (or one tick of that clock). Note that the rocket is not always a free float frame, (IRF), since it accelerates at times, (its path is curved). We need to be careful with neighboring events not joined by a straight line; in this interval the frame is accelerating and the principles we ve set up do not need to hold. To get around this we will assume that all of the receptions are close enough together such that they are all connected by straight worldlines. We cut up the path into small segments. When the rocket returns home at event B the light clock will have read off the total proper time elapsed during its journey. To other reference frames, like the lab, this proper time will equal the cumulative interval of all the ticks along the path, i.e. taking the interval between 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, etc. and adding them up. All IRFs will agree on this cumulative interval which equals the elapsed proper time. The only way the lab frame finds the total proper time is to add up these segments separately. Finding the interval between O and B directly will not work. An analogy might suffice here. Consider a car traveling between two cities. The distance traveled by the car can easily be read off of the odometer. To an observer not in the car to measure the distance is not so easy. Simply measuring the distance between the 8
9 cities will not give the correct result since the road bends and twists. The only way for the observer to measure the distance the car has traveled is to cut up the path into small segments and add up the distance of the segments. Then the observer will get the same result as the car s odometer. We see that finding the interval between two events can vary if the path or worldline between the two events is curved. Before we only examined IRFs and we saw that there was only one IRF which can have the events occur at the same location. (Assuming that the events are timelike separated). But if we have a worldline which is not straight we will get a different result for the proper time. The proper time for the curved worldline will not equal the proper time for an IRF connecting the same two points. This is the same as in flat space (not spacetime), the shortest distance between two points is a straight line but there are infinitely many longer curved paths which can connect the two points. The same occurs here except the metric throws in a twist. What we see is that the straight worldline has the longest proper time. s 2 = (ct ) 2. Any other frame will require summing the end segments, s 2 = (ct i ) 2 (x i ) 2. Since we are subtracting off the i=start spatial part we see that it will be less than the straight worldline. Again, the straight worldline has the longest proper time. It is important to note that the total proper time along a worldline is an invariant. It has the same value in all IRFs, (since it is essentially the interval). What we see is that if we have a set of identical siblings and all but one sets off on a space journey and they all meet later, the one with the straight worldline, (the one who stays at home), will be the oldest. Consider a particle in deep space and picture its worldline between two events. If no outside forces act on this particle, (it s a free particle) it will not accelerate. Hence in special relativity it will have a straight worldline. Hence it will follow a worldline of maximal aging. This is raised to a principle, The Principle of Maximal Aging. This is not only true in deep space (in an IRF) but also in a region near a gravitating mass. In such regions we will need to use General Relativity to examine systems. This principle provides a bridge between SR and GR. The proper time (cumulative interval) is a fundamental method of comparing different worldlines between events. One last point to make is regarding the stretch factor and IRFs. Remember that we found that the time dilates between two uniform moving frames. t = t Now if one of these is the proper frame (indicating the proper time by ) we see we can define as follows, = t = 1 1 v2 c 2 9 = timeinframe proper time (Again this is for IRFs, if the worldline is curved we will need to cut up the worldline into segments where each segment is approximately an IRF). We can easily find the stretch factor if we know the proper time. Say a rocket goes by and you see 1 second go by on its clock while yours ticks off 3 seconds. Well then = 3s/1s = 3, from which you can invert to find the speed of the other clock. 1 3 = 1 2 1/ 9 = 1 2 v c = 8 = Hence can be used as a measure of speed. 9
10 Transforming Between Frames, Spacelike Separated Events We continue our discussion of spacetime maps and translating between reference frames. Examine the following plot for IRFs all observing the same interval between two events. This line gives all of the timelike separated frames. [The following refers back to the discussion in Box L-1 of your text, pg 108]. Remember back to our discussion of the object moving faster than the speed of light, discussed in Box L-1 of your text. The squared interval between the throw and reception is negative, Lab frame. x = 0 x = 3 ly t = 0 t = 1 ly from which s 2 = c 2 (1 y) 2 (3 ly) 2 = -8 ly 2. This was the same in the shuttle s frame (traveling at 0.6 c), x = 0 x = 3 ly t = 0 t = -1 y from which s 2 = - 8 ly 2. And now consider a frame traveling at 0.3c then, x = 0 x = 8 ly t = 0 t = 0 y from which s 2 = - 8 ly 2. The events occur simultaneously in this frame. We see that for spacelike separated events there is an invariant hyperbola lying outside the light cone along the x axis. And note now that transforming between these frame the temporal order between events can switch. (And for timelike separated events the spatial order can switch). For timelike and spacelike separated events there is a barrier, the speed of light, or the lightlike events. So that the type of separation between events is invariant. (timelike for one, timelike for all). Timelike (interval) 2 + Spacelike (interval) 2 - Lightlike (interval) 2 0 In three dimensions the lightcone creates a barrier, a natural partitioning of spacetime. s 2 = c 2 t 2 - x 2 -y 2 -z 2. Note that spacelike separated events can not be causally related, (no information can pass from one event to the other). 10
EPGY Special and General Relativity. Lecture 4B
Lecture 4B In the previous lecture we found that the proper description of the universe is one consisting of a four-dimensional manifold (space) endowed with a Lorentzian metric, (of course we are restricting
More informationConsequences of special relativity.
PHYS419 Lecture 12 Consequences of special relativity 1 Consequences of special relativity. The length of moving objects. Recall that in special relativity, simultaneity depends on the frame of reference
More informationConsequences of special relativity.
PHYS419 Lecture 12 Consequences of special relativity 1 Consequences of special relativity. The length of moving objects. Recall that in special relativity, simultaneity depends on the frame of reference
More informationCHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1 2.1 The Apparent Need for Ether 2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3 Einstein s Postulates 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation 2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction
More informationWhat is allowed? relativity: physics is the same for all observers so light travels at the same speed for everyone. so what? THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
Relativity, part 2 What is allowed? relativity: physics is the same for all observers so light travels at the same speed for everyone so what? THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA CENTER FOR MATERIALS FOR INFORMATION
More informationCorrect Resolution of the Twin Paradox
Correct Resolution of the Twin Paradox Michael Huemer In the following, I explain the Twin Paradox, which is supposed to be a paradoxical consequence of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR). I give the
More informationPhysics. Special Relativity
Physics Special Relativity 1 Albert Einstein, the high school dropout and patent office clerk published his ideas on Special Relativity in 1905. 2 Special vs. General Relativity Special Relativity deals
More informationTech Notes 4 and 5. Let s prove that invariance of the spacetime interval the hard way. Suppose we begin with the equation
Tech Notes 4 and 5 Tech Notes 4 and 5 Let s prove that invariance of the spacetime interval the hard way. Suppose we begin with the equation (ds) 2 = (dt) 2 (dx) 2. We recall that the coordinate transformations
More informationSpecial Relativity 05/09/2008. Lecture 14 1
How Fast Are You Moving Right Now? Special Relativity Einstein messes with space and time 0 m/s relative to your chair 400 m/s relative to earth center (rotation) 30,000 m/s relative to the sun (orbit)
More informationWhy do we need a new theory?
Lecture 7: General Relativity We now begin our foray into the beautiful, yet sophisticated theory of General Relativity. At first we will explain the need for a new theory and then outline the ideas. We
More informationLecture Notes on Relativity. Last updated 10/1/02 Pages 1 65 Lectures 1 10
Lecture Notes on Relativity Last updated 10/1/02 Pages 1 65 Lectures 1 10 Special Relativity: Introduction Describes physics of fast motion i.e. when objects move relative to each other at very high speeds,
More informationThe Lorentz Transformation
The Lorentz Transformation During the fourth week of the course, we spent some time discussing how the coordinates of two different reference frames were related to each other. Now that we know about the
More informationThe Lorentz Transformations
The Lorentz Transformations Michael Fowler, UVa Physics. /6/08 Problems with the Galilean Transformations We have already seen that Newtonian mechanics is invariant under the Galilean transformations relating
More informationChapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity What are the major ideas of general relativity? Spacetime Special relativity showed that space and time are not absolute. Instead, they are inextricably linked in a four-dimensional
More informationObservations versus Measurements
Observations versus Measurements Pre-Collegiate Institutes Special and General Relativity 2015 In all discussions pertaining to relativity one needs to be careful to distinguish the reference frame from
More informationReview Special Relativity. February 3, Absolutes of Relativity. Key Ideas of Special Relativity. Path of Ball in a Moving Train
February 3, 2009 Review Special Relativity General Relativity Key Ideas of Special Relativity No material object can travel faster than light If you observe something moving near light speed: Its time
More information04. Kinematical Effects 1. Time Dilation
04. Kinematical Effects 1. Time Dilation B D y' S' P x' Consider a "light clock" that defines a reference frame S'. One "tick" of this clock = time for light to travel PBP = t = 2D c. y y' S' x' S-clock
More informationAccelerated Observers
Accelerated Observers In the last few lectures, we ve been discussing the implications that the postulates of special relativity have on the physics of our universe. We ve seen how to compute proper times
More informationLecture 6. Velocity Through Spacetime
Lecture 6 Velocity Through Spacetime Soon, we will want to examine momentum and energy within special relativity but first we need to discuss some properties of velocity. We want to consider now a particle
More information1st Year Relativity - Notes on Lectures 3, 4 & 5
1st Year Relativity - Notes on Lectures 3, 4 & 5 Lecture Three 1. Now lets look at two very important consequences of the LTs, Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and time dilation. We ll start with time dilation.
More informationChapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity. Agenda. Distinguishing Crackpots
Chapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity Agenda Announce: Online Quizzes Observations Extra Credit Lecture Distinguishing Crackpot/Genuine Science Review of Special Relativity General Relativity Distinguishing
More informationSpecial Relativity: Derivations
Special Relativity: Derivations Exploring formulae in special relativity Introduction: Michelson-Morley experiment In the 19 th century, physicists thought that since sound waves travel through air, light
More informationA. B. Lahanas University of Athens, Physics Department, Nuclear and Particle Physics Section, Athens , Greece
SPECIAL RELATIVITY A. B. Lahanas University of Athens, Physics Department, Nuclear and Particle Physics Section, Athens 157 71, Greece Abstract We give an introduction to Einstein s Special Theory of Relativity.
More informationAST1100 Lecture Notes
AST1100 Lecture Notes 9 10 The special theory of relativity: Four vectors and relativistic dynamics 1 Worldlines In the spacetime diagram in figure 1 we see the path of a particle (or any object) through
More informationRelative Motion (a little more than what s in your text, so pay attention)
Lab Activity Relative Motion (a little more than what s in your tet, so pay attention) Relative motion is something we use everyday, but we don t really think about it. For eample, passing a truck on the
More information( ) 2 + v t B = 2 D2 + L 2. = 2D c. t B. & t A. , L = v t B. D = c t A. + v t. = t A. = 2 c. c 2. ( v2 c ) = t. 1 v2. t B 2 = t A.
LECTURE The Theory of Special Relativity [PSR] This principle seems innocuous enough, and it is the entirety of the theory of special relativity and in essence that s it however, there are consequences
More informationTheory of Relativity Final Quiz July 11, VERY short answers. Each worth 1 point.
Theory of Relativity Final Quiz July 11, 2012 Name: Below are short questions and problems. Answer to the best of your ability. All equations and constants you need are on a separate sheet. VERY short
More informationAstronomy 421. Lecture 24: Black Holes
Astronomy 421 Lecture 24: Black Holes 1 Outline General Relativity Equivalence Principle and its Consequences The Schwarzschild Metric The Kerr Metric for rotating black holes Black holes Black hole candidates
More informationQuantum Black Hole and Information. Lecture (1): Acceleration, Horizon, Black Hole
Quantum Black Hole and Information Soo-Jong Rey @ copyright Lecture (1): Acceleration, Horizon, Black Hole [Convention: c = 1. This can always be reinstated from dimensional analysis.] Today, we shall
More informationPhysics 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2008
Physics 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2008 Problem Set # 2 Solutions Problems 1. A Moving Clock (7 points) A clock moves along the x-axis in your reference frame at a speed of 0.80c and reads zero as it
More informationEinstein for Everyone Lecture 4: Paradoxes; Minkowski Spacetime
Einstein for Everyone Lecture 4: Paradoxes; Minkowski Spacetime Dr. Erik Curiel Munich Center For Mathematical Philosophy Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität 1 Velocity Addition 2 Paradoxes 3 Spacetime and
More informationLecture 10: General Relativity I
Lecture 10: General Relativity I! Recap: Special Relativity and the need for a more general theory! The strong equivalence principle! Gravitational time dilation! Curved space-time & Einstein s theory
More information2.6 Invariance of the Interval
2.6 Invariance of the Interval Note. In this section, we define a quantity called the interval between two events which is invariant under a change of spacetime coordinates from one inertial frame to another
More informationLecture 13 Notes: 07 / 20. Invariance of the speed of light
Lecture 13 Notes: 07 / 20 Invariance of the speed of light The Michelson-Morley experiment, among other experiments, showed that the speed of light in vacuum is a universal constant, as predicted by Maxwell's
More informationLecture Outline Chapter 29. Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Lecture Outline Chapter 29 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker Chapter 29 Relativity Units of Chapter 29 The Postulates of Special Relativity The Relativity of Time and Time Dilation The Relativity of
More informationThe spacetime of special relativity
1 The spacetime of special relativity We begin our discussion of the relativistic theory of gravity by reviewing some basic notions underlying the Newtonian and special-relativistic viewpoints of space
More informationTest 3 results B A. Grades posted in Learn
Test 3 results Grades posted in Learn D C B A End of the Semester approaches - make sure that your test, clicker and homework grades are what you think they should be on Learn F Clicker Question: What
More informationIntroduction. Classical vs Modern Physics. Classical Physics: High speeds Small (or very large) distances
Introduction Classical vs Modern Physics High speeds Small (or very large) distances Classical Physics: Conservation laws: energy, momentum (linear & angular), charge Mechanics Newton s laws Electromagnetism
More informationMr Green sees the shorter, straight, green path and Mr. Red sees the longer, curved, red path.
Mr Green sees the shorter, straight, green path and Mr. Red sees the longer, curved, red path. In an accelerated frame, time runs slow compared to a non-accelerated frame. The Equivalence Principle tells
More information8.20 MIT Introduction to Special Relativity IAP 2005 Tentative Outline
8.20 MIT Introduction to Special Relativity IAP 2005 Tentative Outline 1 Main Headings I Introduction and relativity pre Einstein II Einstein s principle of relativity and a new concept of spacetime III
More informationLorentz Transformation x = γ (x vt) y = y z = z t = γ (t vx/c 2 ) where γ 1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2
Lorentz Transformation x = γ (x vt) y = y z = z t = γ (t vx/c 2 ) where γ 1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive x-direction away from earth at speed 0.3c; it leaves earth
More informationClass 5: Equivalence Principle
Class 5: Equivalence Principle In this class we will discuss the conceptual foundations of General Relativity, in which gravity may be associated with the reference frames in which perceive events Class
More informationLecture 4 - Lorentz contraction and the Lorentz transformations
Lecture 4 - Lorentz contraction and the Lorentz transformations E. Daw April 4, 2011 1 The inadequacy of the Galilean transformations In Lecture 1 we learned that two inertial (non-accelerating) observers,
More informationExtra notes on rela,vity. Wade Naylor
Extra notes on rela,vity Wade Naylor Over 105 years since Einstein s Special theory of relativity A. Einstein, 1879-1955 The postulates of special relativity 1. The principle of relativity (Galileo) states
More informationModern Physics. Luis A. Anchordoqui. Department of Physics and Astronomy Lehman College, City University of New York. Lesson IV September 24, 2015
Modern Physics Luis A. Anchordoqui Department of Physics and Astronomy Lehman College, City University of New York Lesson IV September 24, 2015 L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Modern Physics 9-24-2015 1 / 22
More informationThe Philosophy of Physics. Special Relativity and Minkowski Spacetime
The Philosophy of Physics Lecture Five Special Relativity and Minkowski Spacetime Rob Trueman rob.trueman@york.ac.uk University of York Special Relativity a quick refresher Special Relativity and Minkowski
More informationE = mc 2. Inertial Reference Frames. Inertial Reference Frames. The Special Theory of Relativity. Slide 1 / 63. Slide 2 / 63.
Slide 1 / 63 The Special Theory of Relativity E = mc 2 Inertial Reference Frames Slide 2 / 63 Newton's laws are only valid in inertial reference frames: n inertial reference frame is one which is not accelerating
More information2.1 Einstein s postulates of Special Relativity. (i) There is no ether (there is no absolute system of reference).
Chapter 2 Special Relativity The contradiction brought about by the development of Electromagnetism gave rise to a crisis in the 19th century that Special Relativity resolved. 2.1 Einstein s postulates
More informationwhere = observed wavelength when v = 0
where = observed wavelength when v = 0 called the k-factor and c = speed of light. NOTE: if v > 0, then the source and observer are moving away from each other This is the famous galactic red shift observed
More informationSimultaneity, Time Dilation, and Length Contraction Using Minkowski Diagrams and Lorentz Transformations
Simultaneity, Time Dilation, and Length Contraction Using Minkowski Diagrams and Lorentz Transformations Dr. Russell L. Herman January 25, 2008 (modified: January 17, 2018) Abstract In these notes we present
More informationNotes - Special Relativity
Notes - Special Relativity 1.) The problem that needs to be solved. - Special relativity is an interesting branch of physics. It often deals with looking at how the laws of physics pan out with regards
More informationDisplacement and Velocity
2.2 Displacement and Velocity In the last section, you saw how diagrams allow you to describe motion qualitatively. It is not at all difficult to determine whether an object or person is at rest, speeding
More information3.3 Acceleration An example of acceleration Definition of acceleration Acceleration Figure 3.16: Steeper hills
3.3 Acceleration Constant speed is easy to understand. However, almost nothing moves with constant speed for long. When the driver steps on the gas pedal, the speed of the car increases. When the driver
More informationSpacetime Diagrams and Einstein s Theory For Dummies
1 Spacetime Diagrams and Einstein s Theory For Dummies A Set of Five Lesson Plans for School Teachers Dr. Muhammad Ali Yousuf Assistant Program Manager CTY Summer Programs And Physics and Mathematics Instructor
More informationPhysics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 4. April 3, 2009
Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 4 April 3, 2009 Synchronizing Clocks Sam v Sally After coincidence of their origins at t=0, t = 0 Sam and Sally agree to send light signals to each other after time t
More informationThe Foundations of Special Relativity
The Foundations of Special Relativity 1 Einstein's postulates of SR: 1. The laws of physics are identical in all inertial reference frames (IFs). 2. The speed of light in vacuum, c, is the same in all
More informationGravity and Spacetime: Why do things fall?
Gravity and Spacetime: Why do things fall? A painless introduction to Einstein s theory of space, time and gravity David Blair University of WA Abstract I present a simple description of Einstein s theory
More informationElements of Physics II
Physics 132: Lecture 23 Elements of Physics II Agenda for Today Special Theory of relativity Inertial vs. non-inertial reference frames Postulates of SR Consequences of SR Time dilation Length contraction
More informationMIT Course 8.033, Fall 2006, Relativistic Kinematics Max Tegmark Last revised October
MIT Course 8.33, Fall 6, Relativistic Kinematics Max Tegmark Last revised October 17 6 Topics Lorentz transformations toolbox formula summary inverse composition (v addition) boosts as rotations the invariant
More informationPhysics 2D Lecture Slides Jan 10. Vivek Sharma UCSD Physics
Physics D Lecture Slides Jan 10 Vivek Sharma UCSD Physics Time Dilation Example: Relativistic Doppler Shift Light : velocity c = f λ, f=1/t A source of light S at rest Observer S approches S with velocity
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Physics Out: Friday 29 September 2006 Due: Friday 6 October 2006.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics Physics 8.033 Out: Friday 29 September 2006 Due: Friday 6 October 2006 Problem Set 4 Due: Friday 6 October 2006 at 4:00PM. Please deposit the
More informationI D a. :ntta1 I C a m I. Homework Problems 83. Figure R4.7. M is f v I = V GM/R, where G is the universal gravitational
Homework Problems 83 Event E Event F Brian :ntta1 I C a m I (a) Tram (b) Train Brian I D a ve... itl 11 i 11 i i i Figure R4.7 (a) Event E and (b) event Fin the situation described in problem R4M.3. R4M.3
More informationKinematics of special relativity
Chapter 2 Kinematics of special relativity 2.1 Special Relativity 2.1.1 Principles of Relativity Einstein postulated that there was still Galilean invariance, i. e. all uniformly moving observers had the
More informationChapter 2: Motion in One Dimension
Chapter : Motion in One Dimension Review: velocity can either be constant or changing. What is the mathematical meaning of v avg? The equation of a straight line is y = mx + b. From the definition of average
More informationTopics: Relativity: What s It All About? Galilean Relativity Einstein s s Principle of Relativity Events and Measurements
Chapter 37. Relativity Topics: Relativity: What s It All About? Galilean Relativity Einstein s s Principle of Relativity Events and Measurements The Relativity of Simultaneity Time Dilation Length g Contraction
More informationEngineering Physics 1 Dr. Rajdeep Chatterjee Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology-Roorkee
Engineering Physics 1 Dr. Rajdeep Chatterjee Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology-Roorkee Module-07 Lecture-03 Introduction of Special Relativity - II Hello, everybody, so today we come
More informationModern Physics. Third Edition RAYMOND A. SERWAY CLEMENT J. MOSES CURT A. MOYER
Modern Physics Third Edition RAYMOND A. SERWAY CLEMENT J. MOSES CURT A. MOYER 1 RELATIVITY 1.1 Special Relativity 1.2 The Principle of Relativity, The Speed of Light 1.3 The Michelson Morley Experiment,
More informationSpecial relativity, 3. How big is gamma? The Lorentz transformations depend on the factor γ =
Special relativity, 3 A few kinematic consequences of the Lorentz transformations How big is gamma? The Lorentz transformations depend on the factor γ = 1 1 β 2, where β = V c. For macroscopic objects,
More informationSpecial Relativity Lecture
Special Relativity Lecture Prateek Puri August 24, 200 The Lorentz Transformation So far, we have proved length contraction and time dilation only for very specific situations involving light clocks; however,
More informationNewtonian mechanics: kinematics and dynamics Kinematics: mathematical description of motion (Ch 2, Ch 3) Dynamics: how forces affect motion (Ch 4)
July-15-14 10:39 AM Chapter 2 Kinematics in One Dimension Newtonian mechanics: kinematics and dynamics Kinematics: mathematical description of motion (Ch 2, Ch 3) Dynamics: how forces affect motion (Ch
More informationEinstein Toolkit Workshop. Joshua Faber Apr
Einstein Toolkit Workshop Joshua Faber Apr 05 2012 Outline Space, time, and special relativity The metric tensor and geometry Curvature Geodesics Einstein s equations The Stress-energy tensor 3+1 formalisms
More informationThe result is; distances are contracted in the direction of motion.
The result is; distances are contracted in the direction of motion. t = t/(1 v 2 /c 2 ) 0.5 d = d(1- v 2 /c 2 ) 0.5 These are the Lorentz equations. The Twin-Paradox. A woman astronaut is going to fly
More informationClass 1: Special Relativity
Class 1: Special Relativity In this class we will review some important concepts in Special Relativity, that will help us build up to the General theory Class 1: Special Relativity At the end of this session
More informationQ W u e. c t o u m m e P h B. B e. s c i k c s 2. John Harris 1
Q W u e a l n c t o u m m e P h B y a s c i k c s 2 & B e y o n d! Yale Physics 120 3/26/2018 Quantum Physics and Beyond John Harris 1 Physics 120 Reminder: the Rest of the Term Today - Mar 26 Mon Apr
More informationSPECIAL RELATIVITY. Introduction:
SPECIAL RELATIVITY Introduction: When Mr. La Rosa started talking about relativity in class, I first was lost and didn t get the idea. At That time I was thinking of a subject for my project. I thought
More informationSpecial Theory of Relativity Prof. Dr. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
(Refer Slide Time: 00:36) Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Dr. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 7 Examples of Length Contraction and Time Dilation Hello,
More informationMethods of Motion. Honors Physics
Methods of Motion Honors Physics YOU deserve a speeding ticket! I am the LAW around here and the LAW says that the speed limit is 55 miles per hour! Here is the scenario! You wake up late and have 20 minutes
More informationModern Physics Part 2: Special Relativity
Modern Physics Part 2: Special Relativity Last modified: 23/08/2018 Links Relative Velocity Fluffy and the Tennis Ball Fluffy and the Car Headlights Special Relativity Relative Velocity Example 1 Example
More informationA BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL RELATIVITY PART 1: SPECIAL RELATIVITY ARICK SHAO
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL RELATIVITY PART 1: SPECIAL RELATIVITY ARICK SHAO These notes are the first of a pair of brief articles containing an informal introduction to the mathematics behind
More informationRelativity. Overview & Postulates Events Relativity of Simultaneity. Relativity of Time. Relativity of Length Relativistic momentum and energy
Relativity Overview & Postulates Events Relativity of Simultaneity Simultaneity is not absolute Relativity of Time Time is not absolute Relativity of Length Relativistic momentum and energy Relativity
More informationPhysics 2D Lecture Slides Oct 1. Vivek Sharma UCSD Physics
Physics D Lecture Slides Oct 1 Vivek Sharma UCSD Physics Einstein s Special Theory of Relativity Einstein s Postulates of SR The laws ofphysics must be the same in all inertial reference frames The speed
More informationa) An object decreasing speed then increasing speed in the opposite direction.
Putting it all Together 10.1 Practice Use the kinematics equations to solve the following problems: a) You throw a marble up at the speed of 10 m/s. What is its maximum height? b) You drop a marble from
More informationYour (primed) frame frame
6 Special Relativity 6.1 Galiean Relativity 6.1.1 Spacetime Diagrams We keep seeing the word relativity appear in our discussion. To the person on the street, relativity (normally associated with Einstein)
More informationCommunicating with accelerated observers in Minkowski spacetime
IOP PUBLISHING Eur. J. Phys. 29 (2008) 73 84 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/1/007 Communicating with accelerated observers in Minkowski spacetime F J Flores Philosophy Department,
More informationUnit- 1 Theory of Relativity
Unit- 1 Theory of Relativity Frame of Reference The Michelson-Morley Experiment Einstein s Postulates The Lorentz Transformation Time Dilation and Length Contraction Addition of Velocities Experimental
More informationPhysics Einstein
Physics 200-04 Einstein Poincare and Lorentz: Throughout the last few years of the 19th century, two people were the chief advocates for a radical rethinking of physics in the face of the problems that
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Physics October Quiz 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics Physics 8.033 17 October 2006 Quiz 1 Name: (Last, First) (please print). Recitation number (circle one): 1 2 3 Record all answers and show all
More informationChapter 34: Spacetime and General Relativity
The views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil of experimental physics, and therein lies their strength. They are radical. Henceforth, space by itself, and time by
More informationChapter 1. Relativity 1
Chapter 1 Relativity 1 Classical Relativity inertial vs noninertial reference frames Inertial Reference Frames Galilean transformation: x = x vt; y = y; z = z; t = t u x = u x v; u y = u y ; u z = u z
More informationNotes on Mermin It s About Time. John R. Boccio Professor of Physics Swarthmore College
Notes on Mermin It s About Time John R. Boccio Professor of Physics Swarthmore College August 16, 2010 Contents 1 The Principle of Relativity 1 2 Combining(Small) Velocities 7 3 The Speed of Light 9 4
More informationThe Relativity of Simultaneity
Let me begin with a little homily. In non-technical presentations of the theories of relativity (even the best of them) the austere pictures of world-lines of clocks are sometimes humanized or anthropomorphized
More informationPhysics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 3. January 8, 2010
Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 3 January 8, 2010 Immediate Consequences of Einstein s Postulates: Recap Events that are simultaneous for one Observer are not simultaneous for another Observer in relative
More informationCH 2, Sample Problem 2
Special Relativity CH 2, Sample Problem 2 A river flows at uniform speed v w = 1.0 m/s between parallel shores a distance D = 120 m apart. A kayaker can paddle at 2.0 m/s relative to the water. a) If the
More informationPhysics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 2. Jan. 5, 2010
Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 2 Jan. 5, 2010 Lecture 1: Relativity Describing a Physical Phenomenon Event (s) Observer (s) Frame(s) of reference (the point of View! ) Inertial Frame of Reference Accelerated
More informationGravitation and Cosmology
Lecture : Reading: Ohanian, Ch. ---- all!, Ch 2., 2.2 The principle of relativity The principle of relativity was discovered by Galileo. It states that the laws of nature do not permit experimental measurement
More information5) A stone is thrown straight up. What is its acceleration on the way up? 6) A stone is thrown straight up. What is its acceleration on the way down?
5) A stone is thrown straight up. What is its acceleration on the way up? Answer: 9.8 m/s 2 downward 6) A stone is thrown straight up. What is its acceleration on the way down? Answer: 9.8 m/ s 2 downward
More informationDef. 1. A time travel spacetime is a solution to Einstein's equations that admits closed timelike curves (CTCs).
17. Time Travel 2 Def. 1. A time travel spacetime is a solution to Einstein's equations that admits closed timelike curves (CTCs). Def. 2. A time machine spacetime is a time travel spacetime in which the
More informationModern Physics notes Paul Fendley Lecture 34. Born, chapter III (most of which should be review for you), chapter VII
Modern Physics notes Paul Fendley fendley@virginia.edu Lecture 34 General Relativity Born, chapter III (most of which should be review for you), chapter VII Fowler, Remarks on General Relativity Ashby
More informationLecture 10: General Relativity I
Lecture 10: General Relativity I Einstein Tower Experiment Gravitational redshifting Strong Equivalence Principal Sidney Harris 10/2/13 1 O: RECAP OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY Einstein s postulates Laws of physics
More informationExperimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time
Experimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time Lorentz Transformation Thought Experiment GPS Clock Calculations Pound-Rebka Experiment Triplet Paradox Experiment The Lorentz transformation
More information