# Correct Resolution of the Twin Paradox

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

1 Correct Resolution of the Twin Paradox Michael Huemer In the following, I explain the Twin Paradox, which is supposed to be a paradoxical consequence of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR). I give the correct resolution of the paradox, explaining why STR is not inconsistent as it appears at first glance. I also debunk two common, incorrect responses to the paradox. This should help the reader to understand Special Relativity and to see how the theory is coherent. I. Background: Time and Length Dilation According to STR, different intertial reference frames (RF s) can disagree on the time that elapses between two events, as well as on the length of an object. These discrepancies are described by the Lorentz Transformation equations: Here, L 0 is the length an object has in a reference frame in which it is at rest, while L is the length the object has according to a reference frame in which it is moving at velocity v. Similarly, T 0 is the time between some pair of events in a reference frame in which the events take place at the same (spatial) place, whereas T is the time between those events according to a reference frame in which the events are separated by a path of velocity v (that is, the ratio of the spatial distance between the events to the temporal distance between the events is v). c is the speed of light. For example: suppose I m in a spaceship that s traveling at c/2 (half the speed of light) relative to the Earth. Suppose that in my reference frame, I measure my ship to be 100 feet long. So L 0 = 100 ft. Then observers on Earth are going to measure my spaceship to have a length of: Similarly, suppose that I have a clock in my spaceship. At the start of my journey, my clock reads 12:00. My clock measures elapsed time according to my reference frame (i.e., the reference frame 1

2 in which the spaceship is at rest). So when the clock strikes 1:00, 1 hour has passed in my reference frame. So T 0 = 1 hr. However, people on Earth will see the time between these two events (my clock striking 12:00 and my clock striking 1:00) as being: So people on Earth will perceive my spaceship as having shrunk (since it is 87 feet long, whereas it was 100 feet long when it was at rest), and they will perceive my clock as moving slower than normal (because it takes it 69 minutes, instead of 60 minutes, to register the passage of an hour). II. The Twin Paradox Here s a statement of the Twin Paradox, designed to make it seem paradoxical: Suppose that two identical twins start out on Earth, the same age. One of them gets in a spaceship and flies around really fast. Call this one Space Twin. The other twin, Earth Twin, stays on Earth the whole time. Finally, Space Twin comes home and meets up with Earth Twin. When they meet, which one will have aged more? Well, according to Earth Twin, Space Twin was moving around really fast, so Space Twin aged slower (like in the example above), so Space Twin is going to look younger. But according to Space Twin, it was Earth Twin who was moving the whole time (in Space Twin s reference frame, Space Twin was stationary). So Earth Twin was aging slower, so Earth Twin is going to look younger. According to STR, both reference frames are equally valid. But presumably, these answers can t both be true; when they see each other, it s not going to be that each of them looks younger than the other. So it looks as if STR with its time dilation postulate is incoherent. The above thinking is in fact wrong; time dilation is not incoherent. I ll explain why below. But first I want to clear the ground of some fallacious explanations. III. Two Wrong Responses to the Twin Paradox I have heard two wrong responses (or claims about the response) to the twin paradox. First, my high school physics teacher said that the resolution of the twin paradox had to do with General 2

3 Relativity, which was beyond the scope of his class. That s false. General Relativity is Einstein s theory of gravitational phenomena. The Twin Paradox has nothing to do with gravitation, nor has it anything to do with the spacetime curvature postulated in GR. As we ll see in section IV, the resolution of the paradox can be given purely within a flat (Minkowski) spacetime. The second false resolution I have heard is that it is the Space Twin who will have aged slower, because it was he who had to accelerate in order to get up to his great speed. In STR, there is an objective distinction between accelerated and uniform (non-accelerated) motion. So it s an objective fact that Space Twin underwent acceleration while Earth Twin didn t. Therefore, Space Twin is the one who was really going fast, so he ll have aged slower. Now, how many things are wrong with this response? a. The response is profoundly un-relativistic. It supposes that Space Twin is the one who was really moving during his voyage, because he s the one who accelerated. (That s like what Newton says about absolute motion.) In relativity theory, there is no objective fact about who is moving at any given point in time; at any time, any given person or object is moving according to some RF s and stationary according to others, and all inertial RF s are equally legitimate. So the proposed response can t possibly be the resolution of the problem according to STR. b. There is no requirement, in STR, that there be some initial conditions in which everything starts out at relative rest. Thus, we may stipulate that Space Twin does not undergo any acceleration to get up to his great speed instead, suppose that Space Twin and Earth Twin just start out in relative motion. Space Twin is already going at near light speed (relative to Earth) at the start of our story. (Equivalently, Earth Twin is already going at near light speed relative to Space Twin at the start of the story.) c. There is no mechanism in STR for the past history of some state of motion (or of anything else, for that matter) to directly exert causal power on things now. The Lorentz Transformation Equations discussed in section I above, for example, do not in any way make use of any facts about past history to determine the amount of length or time dilation. Nor does anything in General Relativity do so. Nor, in fact, does any modern physical theory allow the past to directly influence the present (once the current state of the world is given, how we got to that state is irrelevant to what will happen next). So even if Space Twin had to undergo acceleration in the past to get to his current speed, that would be irrelevant to what effects his current speed has on him. d. Finally, notice that the Lorentz Equations do not take account of acceleration at all length dilation and time dilation are purely a function of the rest length (L 0 ) and rest time (T 0 ), the velocity v, and the speed of light c. Acceleration plays no role. Nor is this different in 3

4 General Relativity or any other theory (that is, no other theory gives any modified Lorentz transformations where acceleration appears in the equations). Given that, acceleration can t have anything to do with the solution to the paradox. IV. Correct Resolution of the Paradox There are two cases to consider: In one scenario, the two twins are in uniform motion throughout the story (they neither accelerate nor decelerate, nor change their direction of motion). In another scenario, Space Twin goes off into space for a while, then turns around (deceleration/acceleration) and comes back to Earth. A. The Case of Uniform Motion In the first case, the twins can only have one meeting without accelerating or decelerating, Space Twin will never return to Earth, so the meeting in which they finally see who has aged more will never happen. What does STR say about this scenario? It says that each twin will age slower, as measured by the other twin. How can this be? The secret lies in the relativity of simultaneity. Consider the space-time diagram in Figure 1. In this diagram, line t is the time axis, according to Earth Twin, while s is the space axis (or: a simultaneity slice) according to Earth Twin. Earth Twin thinks that he s always stationary, and thus that he remains on the t axis (he does not change his spatial location his position along s as time passes). He thinks that any path parallel to t is the path of a stationary object (that is, any such path is stationary in his reference frame). Also, Earth Twin would say that all the spacetime points that lie on s are simultaneous with each other, and all of them occur at (say) t = 0. Earth Twin would say that any line parallel to s also marks a collection of spacetime points that are simultaneous with each other. For instance, the horizontal line labeled t = 4 indicates all the spacetime points (or all the events) that occur at time 4. Earth Twin thinks that Space Twin is moving off to the right, on the path labeled t'. Things look different according to Space Twin. Space Twin says that t', not t, is the time axis. He would say that any path parallel to t' is the path of a stationary object. He would say that Earth Twin, who occupies line t, is moving uniformly to the left. Now here s a slightly surprising point: Space Twin s space axis is s', rather than s. (When you tilt your time axis to the right, you have to tilt your space axis toward your time axis. To see why this is true, consider the fact that the speed of light has to be a constant for all reference frames. The speed of light is the ratio of (spatial distance) to (temporal distance) along the path of the light ray. To keep that ratio constant, if you consider an RF whose time axis is tilted to the right, its space axis must be tilted up.) Space Twin would say that all events lying on s' (not the events lying on s) are simultaneous 4

5 Figure 1 with each other. He would likewise say that any line parallel to s' marks off a set of simultaneous spacetime points. For instance, the slanted line labeled t' = 4 represents everything that happens at time 4, according to Space Twin. Now, here s why both twins are aging slower, relative to each other. Consider the point where Earth Twin s clock strikes 4. I have marked this point with an X on the diagram. This is where Earth Twin is when 4 units of time have passed according to his reference frame. Now compare the point where Space Twin s clock strikes 4. This happens on the spaceship (so it s on path t'), and it happens when 4 units of time have passed in Space Twin s reference frame. I ve marked this point with an O. Finally, consider the question: which comes first in time: the X or the O? Well, in Earth Twin s RF, the X comes before the O, because the O appears above the t = 4 line on the diagram. But according to Space Twin s RF, the O comes before the X, because the X appears above the t' = 4 line in the diagram. Both RF s are equally good. So: each twin s clock strikes 4 after the other clock does, as measured by the other twin. 5

6 B. The Two-Meeting Case, from Earth s Reference Frame Now to the puzzling case: what happens if Space Twin comes back to Earth, and meets his brother who will be older at that point? To show precisely what STR predicts about this, we need to fill in some details of the scenario. Let s say that Space Twin took off away from Earth at.5c. Ten years later (as measured from Earth s RF), Space Twin turned around and headed back at.5c, until he got back to Earth. So, on Earth, 20 years elapse while Space Twin is away. Figure 2 shows how things look from Earth s frame of reference. Earth Twin just sits around on the t axis, while Space Twin takes the dotted path labeled. During his trip away from Earth (the first ten years), Space Twin s velocity as measured from Earth is.5c. The time that this half of the trip takes, as measured from Earth, is 10 years. So the Lorentz time dilation equation tells us: Figure 2 Note that I put in 10 for T, because 10 years is the time that that part of the trip takes as measured by a reference frame in which Space Twin is not at rest but is moving at velocity v (remember that that s what we said T stood for in the equation in section I). What we re solving for is T 0, the time that elapses according to a reference frame in which the path is stationary (again, that s what we said T 0 stood for in section I). Now, since Space Twin ages 8.66 years during the first half of his trip (because that s how much time passes in his reference frame), he ll age twice that much in the whole trip, or years. So Earth Twin, having aged 20 years, winds up looking older. 6

7 C. The Two-Meeting Case, from Space Twin s Original Reference Frame To see whether the Theory of Relativity is consistent, let s examine how things look from the reference frame in which the Earth is moving to the left at.5c. In this RF, Space Twin starts out stationary while Earth moves away from him at.5c. The Earth is in uniform motion (moving inertially), so it stays at.5c throughout the story, according to this RF. However, at some point Space Twin (again designated by the ) decides he wants to meet up with Earth Twin again, so he fires his rockets and goes extra fast to catch up to the Earth, which has been zooming away all this time. Figure 3, then, is how things look from the standpoint of this RF. Point A is the point where Earth Figure 3 Twin and Space Twin first part ways. Point B is the point where they reunite. Note that there is no reference frame in which Space Twin is at rest throughout the story: he can be moving to the right for the first half of the story then moving to the left for the second half, or he can be stationary at first and then move to the left, or he can be moving to the right at first and then stop. But he cannot be stationary throughout the story, according to any legitimate (inertial) RF. That s because, in relativity, even though there s no objective fact about how fast one is moving at any time, there is an objective fact about whether one accelerates, and at the point at which Space Twin is firing his rockets, he is accelerating (or decelerating) he s either doing it to turn around, or to move to the left to catch up to the Earth, or to slow down and stop so the Earth can catch up to him (this would be in the RF that has Earth and Space Twin both start out moving to the right, and then Space Twin stops). Now, the following, I claim, is what happens according to the reference frame of Figure 3: Earth travels to the left at.5c for 23.1 years. Space Twin sits on his spaceship, stationary, for 8.66 years. Then he fires up his rockets and travels at.8c to the left for years (= 23.1 yrs yrs.), after which he finally catches up to the Earth. 7

8 To see that everything is consistent (or at least the story about who s aging more than whom), let s see how much each twin should age according to this story. How much does Earth Twin age between point A and point B? Note that T is 23.1, because T is the time between A and B according to an RF in which the path between them is not stationary. T 0 is the time between A and B according to an RF in which the path is stationary. The result that T 0 = 20 years is what we want, because we already said (in section B above) that Earth Twin ages 20 years. (Don t get too excited about this, though I got the 23.1 figure in the first place by solving the above equation in reverse.) The real test is to see what happens to Space Twin how much will he age between point A and point B? Well, during the first part of the story, while he s stationary, he ages 8.66 years (there s no time dilation to calculate, since according to this RF, Space Twin is stationary during this time). Now what happens is that during the second part of the story the part where Space Twin is moving to the left at.8c he s going to age extra slowly, so that he ll wind up younger than Earth Twin at the end. Before calculating that, though, you might be wondering where I got the.8c figure. Well, Space Twin is going to catch up to the Earth after 23.1 years. He s already wasted 8.66 years just sitting around. So he s going to have to cover that distance in the remaining years. Now, the spatial distance he has to cover is just the distance that the Earth covers in the 23.1 years that pass between point A and point B. That spatial distance is given by the formula: So Space Twin is going to have to go a distance of 11.55c in years. So his speed will have to be: Now, how much will Space Twin age during this second part of our story? He s going at.8c for years. So the Time Dilation equation tells us: 8

9 Note that once again, we re solving for T 0, since we re interested in how much time passes on the spaceship, according to the RF in which the spaceship is at rest; that gives us how much the people on the ship age. Now, the total amount that Space Twin ages is: aging during first part of story + aging during second part of story = = yrs. This is exactly the amount of aging that was predicted using the first reference frame, in section B above. So the whole story is consistent. Space Twin ages years, while Earth Twin ages 20 years, no matter which reference frame you use. D. The Two-Meeting Case, from Space Twin s Final Reference Frame I mentioned that there s a third reference frame we could use: that s the RF in which Space Twin is stationary in the second half of the story. This RF looks like this (see Figure 4). Here, the calculations are pretty much the same as in section C above, so I won t bother repeating them. Here s what happens according to this third RF: Earth travels to the right at.5c for 23.1 years. At first, Space Twin is traveling to the right at.8c. He does this for years, after which he fires his rockets to stop and let the Earth catch up, which it does after an additional 8.66 years. During the first part of the story, even though Figure 4 9

10 14.44 years pass, Space Twin only ages 8.66 years because he s going so fast (.8c). During the second part of the story, he ages another 8.66 years, for a total of years. Also, although the whole story (between point A and point B) takes 23.1 years, people on Earth only age 20 years due to the fact that they re moving at.5c. And that s it. Whichever of the 3 RF s you choose, you get the same result as to how much Earth Twin ages and how much Space Twin ages even though the RF s disagree about almost everything else (e.g., who was moving at any given point in time, how much time passed between point A and point B, and what the spatial distance between point A and point B is). STR is designed to work this way. Anything that s clearly observable, all the RF s will agree on. How much someone has aged is observable. How much time has really passed, however, is not. That s why STR is designed to make the former invariant (it comes out the same no matter what RF you use), while the latter is not (it varies between reference frames). 10

### Special Theory of Relativity. The Newtonian Electron. Newton vs. Einstein. So if Newtonian Physics is wrong. It is all Relative.

Special Theory of Relativity Chapter 26 The Newtonian Electron Newtonian Theory (everything we have done so far in class) can be tested at high speeds by accelerating electrons or other charged particles

### Consequences of special relativity.

PHYS419 Lecture 12 Consequences of special relativity 1 Consequences of special relativity. The length of moving objects. Recall that in special relativity, simultaneity depends on the frame of reference

### Consequences of special relativity.

PHYS419 Lecture 12 Consequences of special relativity 1 Consequences of special relativity. The length of moving objects. Recall that in special relativity, simultaneity depends on the frame of reference

### Absolute motion versus relative motion in Special Relativity is not dealt with properly

Absolute motion versus relative motion in Special Relativity is not dealt with properly Roger J Anderton R.J.Anderton@btinternet.com A great deal has been written about the twin paradox. In this article

### Chapter 26. Relativity

Chapter 26 Relativity Time Dilation The vehicle is moving to the right with speed v A mirror is fixed to the ceiling of the vehicle An observer, O, at rest in this system holds a laser a distance d below

### How to Understand the Twin Paradox

Advances in Sciences and Humanities 2015; 1(3): 55-59 Published online October 20, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ash) doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20150103.12 How to Understand the Twin Paradox

### EPGY Special and General Relativity. Lecture 4B

Lecture 4B In the previous lecture we found that the proper description of the universe is one consisting of a four-dimensional manifold (space) endowed with a Lorentzian metric, (of course we are restricting

### The result is; distances are contracted in the direction of motion.

The result is; distances are contracted in the direction of motion. t = t/(1 v 2 /c 2 ) 0.5 d = d(1- v 2 /c 2 ) 0.5 These are the Lorentz equations. The Twin-Paradox. A woman astronaut is going to fly

### Accelerated Observers

Accelerated Observers In the last few lectures, we ve been discussing the implications that the postulates of special relativity have on the physics of our universe. We ve seen how to compute proper times

### Experimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time

Experimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time Lorentz Transformation Thought Experiment GPS Clock Calculations Pound-Rebka Experiment Triplet Paradox Experiment The Lorentz transformation

### Modern Physics notes Paul Fendley Lecture 34. Born, chapter III (most of which should be review for you), chapter VII

Modern Physics notes Paul Fendley fendley@virginia.edu Lecture 34 General Relativity Born, chapter III (most of which should be review for you), chapter VII Fowler, Remarks on General Relativity Ashby

### Lorentz Transformations and the Twin Paradox By James Carter

Lorentz Transformations and the Twin Paradox By James Carter The Lorentz transformation m = M/ 1-v 2 /c 2 is a principle of measurement that can be classed as one of the laws of physics. (A moving body

### 04. Kinematical Effects 1. Time Dilation

04. Kinematical Effects 1. Time Dilation B D y' S' P x' Consider a "light clock" that defines a reference frame S'. One "tick" of this clock = time for light to travel PBP = t = 2D c. y y' S' x' S-clock

### SPECIAL RELATIVITY: PART TWO Bertrand Wong, Eurotech, S pore,

SPECIAL RELATIVITY: PART TWO Bertrand Wong, Eurotech, S pore, Email: bwong8@singnet.com.sg Abstract According to Einstein s Special Theory of Relativity, the speed of light always remains constant at 186,000

### PHSC 1053: Astronomy Relativity

PHSC 1053: Astronomy Relativity Postulates of Special Relativity The speed of light is constant in a vacuum and will be the same for ALL observers, independent of their motion relative to the each other

### E = mc 2. Inertial Reference Frames. Inertial Reference Frames. The Special Theory of Relativity. Slide 1 / 63. Slide 2 / 63.

Slide 1 / 63 The Special Theory of Relativity E = mc 2 Inertial Reference Frames Slide 2 / 63 Newton's laws are only valid in inertial reference frames: n inertial reference frame is one which is not accelerating

### Theory of Relativity Final Quiz July 11, VERY short answers. Each worth 1 point.

Theory of Relativity Final Quiz July 11, 2012 Name: Below are short questions and problems. Answer to the best of your ability. All equations and constants you need are on a separate sheet. VERY short

### Test 3 results B A. Grades posted in Learn

Test 3 results Grades posted in Learn D C B A End of the Semester approaches - make sure that your test, clicker and homework grades are what you think they should be on Learn F Clicker Question: What

### Physics. Special Relativity

Physics Special Relativity 1 Albert Einstein, the high school dropout and patent office clerk published his ideas on Special Relativity in 1905. 2 Special vs. General Relativity Special Relativity deals

### Announcement. Einstein s Postulates of Relativity: PHYS-3301 Lecture 3. Chapter 2. Sep. 5, Special Relativity

Announcement PHYS-3301 Lecture 3 Sep. 5, 2017 2 Einstein s Postulates of Relativity: Chapter 2 Special Relativity 1. Basic Ideas 6. Velocity Transformation 2. Consequences of Einstein s Postulates 7. Momentum

### Theory of Relativity Final Quiz July 7, VERY short answers. Each worth 1 point.

Theory of Relativity Final Quiz July 7, 2011 Name: Below are short questions and problems. Answer to the best of your ability. All equations and constants you need are on a separate sheet. VERY short answers.

### Avoiding the Block Universe: A Reply to Petkov Peter Bokulich Boston University Draft: 3 Feb. 2006

Avoiding the Block Universe: A Reply to Petkov Peter Bokulich Boston University pbokulic@bu.edu Draft: 3 Feb. 2006 Key Points: 1. Petkov assumes that the standard relativistic interpretations of measurement

### Modern Physics. Light and Relativity

Modern Physics Light and Relativity Electromagnetism In the late 1800 s, Electricity and Magnetism were united as one force: Electromagnetism Electromagnetism In the late 1800 s, Electricity and Magnetism

### Chapter Two. A Logical Absurdity? Common sense is that layer of prejudices laid down in the mind prior to the age of eighteen -A.

6 Chapter Two A Logical Absurdity? Common sense is that layer of prejudices laid down in the mind prior to the age of eighteen -A. Einstein Einstein, like some others before him, notably the renowned physicistmathematician

Bell s spaceship paradox If the two ships start accelerating at the same time, I always see them travelling at the same velocity, and keeping a constant distance... But I said the objects get shorter when

### Special Relativity 1

Special Relativity 1 Special Relativity: A Summary Caitlyn Edwards Dr. Gan Modern Physics November 2017 Special Relativity 2 Abstract The physics of Einstein s theory of special relativity differs dramatically

### Simultaneity And Time Dilation

OpenStax-CNX module: m42531 1 Simultaneity And Time Dilation OpenStax College This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 Abstract Describe simultaneity.

### 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation

Announcement Course webpage http://highenergy.phys.ttu.edu/~slee/2402/ Textbook PHYS-2402 Lecture 4 Jan. 27, 2015 Lecture Notes, HW Assignments, Physics Colloquium, etc.. 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation

### RELATIVITY. Special Relativity

RELATIVITY Special Relativity FROM WARMUP It was all interesting! How important is it for us to know the Galilean transformation equations and the math of the Michelson-Morley experiment? Know the Galilean

### CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1

CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1 2.1 The Apparent Need for Ether 2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3 Einstein s Postulates 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation 2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction

Wallace Hall Academy CfE Higher Physics Unit 1 - Universe Notes Name 1 Newton and Gravity Newton s Thought Experiment Satellite s orbit as an Application of Projectiles Isaac Newton, as well as giving

Paradoxes of special relativity Today we are turning from metaphysics to physics. As we ll see, certain paradoxes about the nature of space and time result not from philosophical speculation, but from

### Special Relativity 05/09/2008. Lecture 14 1

How Fast Are You Moving Right Now? Special Relativity Einstein messes with space and time 0 m/s relative to your chair 400 m/s relative to earth center (rotation) 30,000 m/s relative to the sun (orbit)

### Astronomy 122 Outline

Astronomy 122 Outline This Class (Lecture 19): Black Holes Next Class: The Milkyway Last Nightlab tonight! HW7 due on Friday. Mar Lecture report due in discussion class on April 5 th th. Nightlab report

### Topics: Relativity: What s It All About? Galilean Relativity Einstein s s Principle of Relativity Events and Measurements

Chapter 37. Relativity Topics: Relativity: What s It All About? Galilean Relativity Einstein s s Principle of Relativity Events and Measurements The Relativity of Simultaneity Time Dilation Length g Contraction

### 12:40-2:40 3:00-4:00 PM

Physics 294H l Professor: Joey Huston l email:huston@msu.edu l office: BPS3230 l Homework will be with Mastering Physics (and an average of 1 hand-written problem per week) Help-room hours: 12:40-2:40

### Einstein for Everyone Lecture 4: Paradoxes; Minkowski Spacetime

Einstein for Everyone Lecture 4: Paradoxes; Minkowski Spacetime Dr. Erik Curiel Munich Center For Mathematical Philosophy Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität 1 Velocity Addition 2 Paradoxes 3 Spacetime and

### On the Arbitrary Choice Regarding Which Inertial Reference Frame is "Stationary" and Which is "Moving" in the Special Theory of Relativity

Regarding Which Inertial Reference Frame is "Stationary" and Which is "Moving" in the Special Theory of Relativity Douglas M. Snyder Los Angeles, CA The relativity of simultaneity is central to the special

### Experimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time

Experimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time Measuring the Fitzgerald Contraction Lorentz Transformation Thought Experiment GPS Clock Calculations Pound-Rebka Experiment Triplet Paradox

### Physics 120 Quantum Physics and Beyond Today!

Physics 120 Quantum Physics and Beyond Today! General Relativity Accelerated Frames General Relativity Light in General Relativity Motion and Time in General Relativity Back to Quantum Entanglement? More

### 0 : Einstein s postulates of Special Relativity

Class 2 : The Special Theory of Relativity Recap of Einstein s postulates Time dilation Length contraction Energy and momentum Causality 0 : Einstein s postulates of Special Relativity Consider a group

### Observations versus Measurements

Observations versus Measurements Pre-Collegiate Institutes Special and General Relativity 2015 In all discussions pertaining to relativity one needs to be careful to distinguish the reference frame from

### Lecture 2 - Length Contraction

Lecture 2 - Length Contraction A Puzzle We are all aware that if you jump to the right, your reflection in the mirror will jump left. But if you raise your hand up, your reflection will also raise its

### Extra notes on rela,vity. Wade Naylor

Extra notes on rela,vity Wade Naylor Over 105 years since Einstein s Special theory of relativity A. Einstein, 1879-1955 The postulates of special relativity 1. The principle of relativity (Galileo) states

### Relativity. An explanation of Brownian motion in terms of atoms. An explanation of the photoelectric effect ==> Quantum Theory

Relativity Relativity In 1905 Albert Einstein published five articles in Annalen Der Physik that had a major effect upon our understanding of physics. They included:- An explanation of Brownian motion

### Tech Notes 4 and 5. Let s prove that invariance of the spacetime interval the hard way. Suppose we begin with the equation

Tech Notes 4 and 5 Tech Notes 4 and 5 Let s prove that invariance of the spacetime interval the hard way. Suppose we begin with the equation (ds) 2 = (dt) 2 (dx) 2. We recall that the coordinate transformations

### New problem of twin paradox

New problem of twin paradox Koshun Suto Koshun_suto129@mbr.nifty.com Abstract The famous paradox in special relativity is twin paradox. It is thought that the cause of the time dilation by the watch of

Analyzing the Twin-Paradox Edward G. Lake Independent Researcher July 9, 2018 detect@outlook.com Abstract: Paul Langevin s so-called Twin Paradox, based upon Albert Einstein s Special Theory of Relativity,

### Review Special Relativity. February 3, Absolutes of Relativity. Key Ideas of Special Relativity. Path of Ball in a Moving Train

February 3, 2009 Review Special Relativity General Relativity Key Ideas of Special Relativity No material object can travel faster than light If you observe something moving near light speed: Its time

### 2.3 The Lorentz Transformation Eq.

Announcement Course webpage http://highenergy.phys.ttu.edu/~slee/2402/ Textbook PHYS-2402 Lecture 3 HW1 (due 9/13) Chapter 2 20, 26, 36, 41, 45, 50, 51, 55, 58 Sep. 6, 2016 2.3 The Lorentz Transformation

### Time Dilation and the Twin Paradox Revisited

Richard A. Peters rapwrap44@cox.net Affiliation: None Time Dilation and the Twin Paradox Revisited Abstract Conventionally, time dilation is defined as the decrease in the rate of flow of time in a frame

### Recall from last time

Welcome back to Physics 215 Today s agenda: Relative Motion Special relativity Forces Physics 215 Spring 2017 Lecture 05-1 1 Recall from last time If we want to use (inertial) moving frames of reference,

### ! Exam 2 in this classroom on Friday! 35 Multiple choice questions! Will cover material from Lecture 12 to 22.!

This Class (Lecture 24): Black Holes Are Fun Next Class: Death by Black Hole: Spaghettification Night Obs/Computer labs due in class on Nov 9 th. HW 2 due on the 7 th. Exam 2 on Friday!! Exam 2 in this

### Special Theory of Relativity. A Brief introduction

Special Theory of Relativity A Brief introduction Classical Physics At the end of the 19th century it looked as if Physics was pretty well wrapped up. Newtonian mechanics and the law of Gravitation had

### The Special Theory of relativity

Chapter 1 The Special Theory of relativity 1.1 Pre - relativistic physics The starting point for our work are Newtons laws of motion. These can be stated as follows: Free particles move with constant velocity.

### Lesson 12 Relativity

Lesson 12 Relativity Introduction: Connecting Your Learning Relative motion was studied at the beginning of the course when the simple notion of adding or subtracting velocities made perfect sense. If

### Spacetime diagrams and Bondi s k-calculus

Spacetime diagrams and Bondi s k-calculus Two important consequences of Einstein s 1905 paper on SR: 1. It was immediately apparent that physicists had been taking the assignment and measurement of coordinates

### Class 16. Prof J. Kenney October 31, Relativity

Class 16 Prof J. Kenney October 31, 2016 Relativity Length contraction (moving sticks are shorter) A measuring stick at rest has a length Lo. When it is propelled at velocity v, it has a shorter length

### Appendices. Chapter Appendix A: Qualitative relativity questions

Chapter 6 Appendices Special Relativity, For the Enthusiastic Beginner (Draft version, December 2016) Copyright 2016, David Morin, morin@physics.harvard.edu 6.1 Appendix A: Qualitative relativity questions

### Solution to the twin paradox. Magnus Axelsson

Solution to the twin paradox Magnus Axelsson 20th November 2008 Problem 1.1 In the Earth frame (which we will refer to as the Laboratory system) the spaceship travels from Earth to Rigel a distance of

### Relativity. Class 16 Prof J. Kenney June 18, boss

Relativity Class 16 Prof J. Kenney June 18, 2018 boss Length contraction (moving sticks are shorter) A measuring stick at rest has a length Lo. When it is propelled at velocity v, it has a shorter length

### Notes - Special Relativity

Notes - Special Relativity 1.) The problem that needs to be solved. - Special relativity is an interesting branch of physics. It often deals with looking at how the laws of physics pan out with regards

### RELATIVITY. Special Relativity

RELATIVITY Special Relativity FROM WARMUP How does special relativity differ from general? Special relativity deals with inertial reference frames. General relativity deals with gravity and acceleration

### PHYSICS - CLUTCH CH 34: SPECIAL RELATIVITY.

!! www.clutchprep.com CONCEPT: INERTIAL REFERENCE FRAMES A reference frame is a coordinate system that you make measurements in, and there are two types: - Inertial reference frames, which move at velocity

### The Philosophy of Physics. Special Relativity and Minkowski Spacetime

The Philosophy of Physics Lecture Five Special Relativity and Minkowski Spacetime Rob Trueman rob.trueman@york.ac.uk University of York Special Relativity a quick refresher Special Relativity and Minkowski

### Relativistic Boats: an explanation of special relativity. Brianna Thorpe, Dr. Michael Dugger

height Relativistic Boats: an explanation of special relativity Brianna Thorpe, Dr. Michael Dugger Time Dilation Relativity is all about your point of view. We are working with the speed of light and some

### Lecture 5. The Lorentz Transformation

Lecture 5 The Lorentz Transformation We have learned so far about how rates of time vary in different IRFs in motion with respect to each other and also how lengths appear shorter when in motion. What

### Lecture Outline Chapter 29. Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Lecture Outline Chapter 29 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker Chapter 29 Relativity Units of Chapter 29 The Postulates of Special Relativity The Relativity of Time and Time Dilation The Relativity of

### What is allowed? relativity: physics is the same for all observers so light travels at the same speed for everyone. so what? THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA

Relativity, part 2 What is allowed? relativity: physics is the same for all observers so light travels at the same speed for everyone so what? THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA CENTER FOR MATERIALS FOR INFORMATION

### The Problem of Slowing Clocks in Relativity Theory

The Problem of Slowing Clocks in Relativity Theory The basic premise of Relativity Theory is that the speed of light ( c ) is a universal constant. Einstein evolved the Special Theory on the assumption

### Elements of Physics II

Physics 132: Lecture 23 Elements of Physics II Agenda for Today Special Theory of relativity Inertial vs. non-inertial reference frames Postulates of SR Consequences of SR Time dilation Length contraction

### PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS (Spring 2002) 1 Substantivalism vs. relationism. Lecture 17: Substantivalism vs. relationism

17.1 432018 PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS (Spring 2002) Lecture 17: Substantivalism vs. relationism Preliminary reading: Sklar, pp. 69-82. We will now try to assess the impact of Relativity Theory on the debate

### Announcements. Muon Lifetime. Lecture 4 Chapter. 2 Special Relativity. SUMMARY Einstein s Postulates of Relativity: EXPERIMENT

Announcements HW1: Ch.2-20, 26, 36, 41, 46, 50, 51, 55, 58, 63, 65 Lab start-up meeting with TA tomorrow (1/26) at 2:00pm at room 301 Lab manual is posted on the course web *** Course Web Page *** http://highenergy.phys.ttu.edu/~slee/2402/

### Time Dilation Re-visualized

Time Dilation Re-visualized Edward G. Lake May 31, 2015 www.ed-lake.com Abstract: Albert Einstein s explanation of Time Dilation [1], along with The Twin Paradox explained by Paul Langevin [2], are re-visualized

### Modern Physics Part 2: Special Relativity

Modern Physics Part 2: Special Relativity Last modified: 23/08/2018 Links Relative Velocity Fluffy and the Tennis Ball Fluffy and the Car Headlights Special Relativity Relative Velocity Example 1 Example

### Chapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity. Agenda. Distinguishing Crackpots

Chapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity Agenda Announce: Online Quizzes Observations Extra Credit Lecture Distinguishing Crackpot/Genuine Science Review of Special Relativity General Relativity Distinguishing

### 1 Intro. 2 Guest Visitor. 3 Rulers

The Equivalence Principle and Foundations of General Relativity K. Arthur Croker Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Hawaii at Manoa http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~kcroker Abstract These are

### Motivation. The Speed of Light. The Speed of Light. In Water Things Look Like This. Introduction to Special and General Relativity

Introduction to Special and General Relativity Motivation: Michelson-Morley Experiment Induction versus Force Law The Basics Events Principles of Relativity Giving up on absolute space and time What Follows

### More Relativity: The Train and The Twins

previous index next More Relativity: The Train and The Twins Michael F owler, UVa Physics, 11/28/07 Einstein s Definition of Common Sense As you can see from the lectures so far, although Einstein s Theory

### Relativity. Transcript.

Relativity Transcript http://quantumspotacademy.org/videos/relativity/ Time, light, mass, energy. These are some of the most fundamental properties in the universe and these are the properties that are

### Twin paradox and Einstein mistake

Twin paradox and Einstein mistake a mathematical approach Based on the book: Logic in the Universe Victor Orsini The Michelson-Morley experiment showed inadvertently that the speed of light is constant.

### Time Travel. Time Travel to the Future via Special Relativity

Time Travel Time Travel is it possible? In these notes, I go over a few methods of time travel that people have thought of over the years. Time Travel to the Future via Special Relativity Of course time

### Kinematics of special relativity

Chapter 2 Kinematics of special relativity 2.1 Special Relativity 2.1.1 Principles of Relativity Einstein postulated that there was still Galilean invariance, i. e. all uniformly moving observers had the

### Pay close attention... because

Pay close attention... because Galilean Relativity Galilean Relativity I drive past a baseball field traveling north at 25 MPH. A player throws the ball south at a speed (relative to the ground) of 70

The Twin Paradox Resolved James Arnold United States doi: 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n3p1 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n3p1 Abstract The so-called Twin Paradox, wherein a relativistic effect is

### Engineering Physics 1 Dr. Rajdeep Chatterjee Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology-Roorkee

Engineering Physics 1 Dr. Rajdeep Chatterjee Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology-Roorkee Module-07 Lecture-03 Introduction of Special Relativity - II Hello, everybody, so today we come

### SPH4U UNIVERSITY PHYSICS

SPH4U UNIVERSITY PHYSICS REVOLUTIONS IN MODERN PHYSICS:... L (P.580-587) Thought Experiments Einstein s two postulates seem straightforward and do not seem to lead to anything new for mechanics. However,

### PHY100S. PHY100S (K. Strong) - Lecture 15 - Slide 1.

http://www.zamandayolculuk.com/cetinbal/timetravelscience.htm PHY100S Lecture 15 http://www.zamandayolculuk.com/cetinbal/htmldosya1/twinparadox-2.htm PHY100S (K. Strong) - Lecture 15 - Slide 1 Current

6 Special Relativity 6.1 Galiean Relativity 6.1.1 Spacetime Diagrams We keep seeing the word relativity appear in our discussion. To the person on the street, relativity (normally associated with Einstein)

### Chapter 26 Special Theory of Relativity

Chapter 26 Special Theory of Relativity Classical Physics: At the end of the 19 th century, classical physics was well established. It seems that the natural world was very well explained. Newtonian mechanics

### The Philosophy of Physics. Is Space Absolute or Relational?

The Philosophy of Physics Lecture Two Is Space Absolute or Relational? Rob Trueman rob.trueman@york.ac.uk University of York Newton s Absolute Motion and Acceleration Is Space Absolute or Relational? Newton

### 2.1 Einstein s postulates of Special Relativity. (i) There is no ether (there is no absolute system of reference).

Chapter 2 Special Relativity The contradiction brought about by the development of Electromagnetism gave rise to a crisis in the 19th century that Special Relativity resolved. 2.1 Einstein s postulates

### Special relativity, 3. How big is gamma? The Lorentz transformations depend on the factor γ =

Special relativity, 3 A few kinematic consequences of the Lorentz transformations How big is gamma? The Lorentz transformations depend on the factor γ = 1 1 β 2, where β = V c. For macroscopic objects,

### Gravity and Spacetime: Why do things fall?

Gravity and Spacetime: Why do things fall? A painless introduction to Einstein s theory of space, time and gravity David Blair University of WA Abstract I present a simple description of Einstein s theory

### ALBERT EINSTEIN AND THE FABRIC OF TIME by Gevin Giorbran

ALBERT EINSTEIN AND THE FABRIC OF TIME by Gevin Giorbran Surprising as it may be to most non-scientists and even to some scientists, Albert Einstein concluded in his later years that the past, present,

### The Lorentz Transformation

The Lorentz Transformation Karl Stratos 1 The Implications of Self-Contained Worlds It sucks to have an upper bound of light speed on velocity (especially for those who demand space travel). Being able

### Today HW#4 pushed back to 8:00 am Thursday Exam #1 is on Thursday Feb. 11

Today HW#4 pushed back to 8:00 am Thursday Exam #1 is on Thursday Feb. 11 Bring a calculator and a #2 pencil Allowed 1 page notes (front and back) E=mc 2, General Relativity, and exam review ISP209s10

### Two postulates Relativity of simultaneity Time dilation; length contraction Lorentz transformations Doppler effect Relativistic kinematics

Two postulates Relativity of simultaneity Time dilation; length contraction Lorentz transformations Doppler effect Relativistic kinematics Phys 2435: Chap. 37, Pg 1 Two postulates New Topic Phys 2435: