ON A SPECTRAL ANALOGUE OF THE STRONG MULTIPLICITY ONE THEOREM. 1. Introduction
|
|
- Chastity Elliott
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ON A SPECTRAL ANALOUE OF THE STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE THEOREM CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN Abstract. We prove spectral analogues of the classical strong multiplicity one theorem for newforms. Let Γ 1 and Γ 2 be uniform lattices in a semisimple group. Suppose all but finitely many irreducible unitary representations (resp. spherical) of occur with equal multiplicities in L 2 (Γ 1 \) and L 2 (Γ 2 \). Then L 2 (Γ 1 \) = L 2 (Γ 2 \) as - modules (resp. the spherical spectra of L 2 (Γ 1 \) and L 2 (Γ 2 \) are equal). 1. Introduction The beginnings of the analogy between the spectrum and arithmetic of Riemannian locally symmetric spaces can be attributed to Maass, who defined non-analytic modular forms as eigenfunctions of the Laplacian satisfying suitable modularity and growth conditions. From the viewpoint of elfand, the theory of Maass forms can be re-interpreted in terms of the representation theory of P SL(2, R) on L 2 (Γ\P SL(2, R)) for a lattice Γ in P SL(2, R). Subsequently, the analogy between the spectrum and arithmetic has been extended by the work of A. Selberg, P. Sarnak and T. Sunada amongst others. In this paper, our aim is to establish an analogue in the spectral context of the classical strong multiplicity one theorem for cusp forms. Suppose f and g are newforms for some Hecke congruence subgroup Γ 0 (N) such that the eigenvalues of the Hecke operator at a prime p are equal for all but finitely many primes p. Then the strong multiplicity one theorem of Atkin and Lehner states that f and g are equal (cf. [8, p.125]). Now, let be a semisimple Lie group and Γ be a uniform lattice (a discrete cocompact subgroup) in. Let R Γ be the right regular representation of on L 2 (Γ\) : R Γ (g)(φ)(y) = φ(yg) g, y and φ L 2 (Γ\) 1
2 2 CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN This defines a unitary representation of. It is known ([5, p.23]) that R Γ decomposes discretely as a direct sum of irreducible unitary representations of occurring with finite multiplicities. Let of irreducible unitary representations of. multiplicity of π in R Γ. Ĝ be the set of equivalence classes For π Ĝ, let m(π, Γ) be the Definition 1.1. Let Γ 1 and Γ 2 be uniform lattices in. The lattices Γ 1 and Γ 2 are said to be representation equivalent in if L 2 (Γ 1 \) = L 2 (Γ 2 \) as representations of, i.e. for every π Ĝ, m(π, Γ 1 ) = m(π, Γ 2 ) In this article we prove the following result : Theorem 1.1. Let Γ 1 and Γ 2 be uniform lattices in a semisimple Lie group. Suppose all but finitely many irreducible unitary representations of occur with equal multiplicities in L 2 (Γ 1 \) and L 2 (Γ 2 \). Then the lattices Γ 1 and Γ 2 are representation equivalent in. The proof of Theorem 1.1 uses the Selberg trace formula and fundamental results of Harish Chandra on the character distributions of irreducible unitary representations of ; in particular, we make crucial use of a deep and difficult result of Harish Chandra that the character distribution of an irreducible unitary representation of is given by a locally integrable function on. We now consider an analogue of Theorem 1.1 for the spherical spectrum of uniform lattices. Let K be a maximal compact subgroup of. An irreducible unitary representation π of is said to be spherical if there exists a non-zero vector v π such that π(k) v = v k K. The spherical spectrum Ĝs of is the subset of Ĝ consisting of equivalence classes of irreducible unitary spherical representations of. Theorem 1.2. Suppose Γ 1, Γ 2 are uniform torsion-free lattices in such that m(π, Γ 1 ) = m(π, Γ 2 )
3 SPECTRAL STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE 3 for all but finitely many representations π in Ĝs. Then m(π, Γ 1 ) = m(π, Γ 2 ) for all representations π in Ĝs. We now relate the spherical spectrum with the spectrum of -invariant differential operators on the associated symmetric space X = /K. For a torsion-free uniform lattice Γ in, let X Γ = Γ\/K be the associated compact Riemannian locally symmetric space. The space of smooth functions on X Γ can be considered as the space of smooth functions on X invariant under the action of Γ. Let D(/K) be the algebra of -invariant differential operators on X. For a character λ of D(/K) (i.e. an algebra homomorphism of D(/K) into C), consider the eigenspace of λ, (1) V (λ, Γ) = {f C (X Γ ) : D(f) = λ(d)(f) D D(/K)}. It is known that the space V (λ, Γ) is of finite dimension (see Section 5). Definition 1.2. Let Γ 1 and Γ 2 be torsion-free uniform lattices in. The locally symmetric spaces X Γ1 = Γ 1 \/K and X Γ2 = Γ 2 \/K are said to be compatibly isospectral if dim (V (λ, Γ 1 )) = dim (V (λ, Γ 2 )) for every character λ of D(/K). Remark 1. From the generalized Sunada criterion proved by Berard [1, p.566] and ordon - DeTurck [2], it can be seen that if two uniform lattices in are representation equivalent, then the associated compact locally symmetric Riemannian spaces X Γ1 and X Γ2 are compatibly isospectral. We prove the following result in Section 4 : Theorem 1.3. Let Γ 1 and Γ 2 be as in Theorem 1.2. Suppose dim (V (λ, Γ 1 )) = dim (V (λ, Γ 2 )) for all but finitely many characters λ, then X Γ1 and X Γ2 are compatibly isospectral.
4 4 CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN If X is of rank one, the algebra D(/K) is the polynomial algebra in the Laplace-Beltrami operator on /K (see [6, p.397]). Hence the eigenvalues of determine the characters of D(/K). Consequently we get : Corollary 1. Let X 1 and X 2 be two locally symmetric Riemannian spaces of rank one and 1, 2 be the Laplace-Beltrami operators acting on the space of smooth functions on X 1 and X 2 respectively. If all but finitely many eigenvalues occur with equal multiplicities in the spectra of 1 and 2, then the spaces are isospectral with respect to the Laplace-Beltrami operators Remark 2. Using an analytic version of the Selberg Trace formula, Corollary 1 has been proved by J. Elstrodt, F. runwald, and J. Mennicke for = P SL(2, R) and = P SL(2, C) ([3, Theorem 3.3, p.203]). 2. Preliminaries 2.1. Representations of semisimple groups. We recall some facts about representations of semisimple groups. Let be a semisimple Lie group with a Haar measure µ. Let π be a unitary representation of on a Hilbert space V. For a compactly supported smooth function f on, define the convolution operator π(f) on V as follows : π(f)(v) = f(g) π(g)v dµ(g)[γ 1 ] [Γ 2 ]. This defines a bounded linear operator on V. We recall the following result from [7, Theorem 10.2; p.334] : Proposition 2.1. Let be a semisimple group and π be an irreducible unitary representation of. Then the convolution operator π(f) is of trace class for every compactly supported smooth function f on. Let π be an irreducible unitary representation of. Let Cc () be the space of compactly supported smooth functions on. Define the character distribution χ π by, χ π (f) = trace (π(f)) f Cc ().
5 SPECTRAL STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE Some results of Harish Chandra. We recall some results of Harish Chandra on the characters of irreducible unitary representations of. Theorem 2.2. [7, Theorem 10.6; p.336] Let {π i } be a finite collection of mutually inequivalent irreducible unitary representations of. Then their characters {χ πi } are linearly independent distributions on C c (). Let L 1 loc () be the space of all complex valued measurable functions f on such that f(g) dµ(g) < for all compact subset C of. C The following deep result of Harish Chandra will be crucially used in the proof of Theorem 1.1. Theorem 2.3. [7, Theorem 10.25; p.356] Let π be an irreducible unitary representation of. The distribution character χ π is given by a locally integrable function h on. i.e. there exists h L 1 loc () such that χ π (f) = f(g) h(g) dµ(g) f Cc () Selberg trace formula for compact quotient. We recall the Selberg trace formula for compact quotient. (For details, see Wallach [9, p ]). Let µ be the normalized -invariant measure on the quotient space Γ\. For a compactly supported smooth function f on, the convolution operator R Γ (f) on L 2 (Γ\) is given by : R Γ (f)(φ)(y) = f(x) φ(yx) dµ(x) φ L 2 (Γ\) and y. [ ] [Γ 1 ] [Γ 2 ] = f(y 1 γx) φ(x) dµ (x). γ Γ Γ\ Since f is a smooth and compactly supported function on and Γ is uniform lattice, the sum K f (y, x) = f(y 1 γx) is a finite sum, and hence it follows γ Γ
6 6 CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN that the operator R Γ (f) is of Hilbert-Schmidt class. The trace of R Γ (f) is defined and it is given by integrating the kernel function K f (y, x), [ ] tr(r Γ (f)) = f(x 1 γx) dµ (x) γ Γ Γ\ Let [γ] (resp. [γ] Γ ) be the conjugacy class of γ in (resp. in Γ). Let [Γ] (resp. [Γ] ) be the set of conjugacy classes in Γ (resp. the -conjugacy classes of elements in Γ). For γ Γ, let γ be the centralizer of γ in. Put Γ γ = Γ γ. It can be seen that Γ γ is a lattice in γ and the quotient Γ γ \ γ is compact. Since γ is unimodular, there exists a -invariant measure on γ \, denoted by d γ x. After normalizing the measures on γ and γ \ appropriately and rearranging the terms on the right hand side of above equation, we get : (2) tr(r Γ (f)) = vol(γ γ \ γ ) f(x 1 γx) d γ x [γ] [Γ] γ\ = a(γ, Γ) O γ (f) [γ] [Γ] where O γ (f) is the orbital integral of f at γ defined by, O γ (f) = f(x 1 γx) d γ x. Here a(γ, Γ) = γ\ [γ ] Γ [γ] vol (Γ γ \ γ ). If γ is not conjugate to an element in Γ, we define a(γ, Γ) = 0. On the other hand, the trace of R Γ (f) on the spectral side can be written as an absolutely convergent series as, (3) tr(r Γ (f)) = m(π, Γ)χ π (f) π Ĝ Hence from (2) and (3), we obtain the Selberg trace formula:
7 SPECTRAL STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE 7 (4) m(π, Γ)χ π (f) = π Ĝ [γ] [Γ] a(γ, Γ) O γ (f). 3. Proof of Theorem Some preliminary lemmas. We first recall some known results about the geometry of conjugacy classes in. Lemma 3.1. Let Γ be a uniform lattice in. Let γ Γ. Then the -conjugacy class [γ] is a closed subset of measure zero in. Proof. Let {gn 1 γg n } n=1 be a sequence of points in [γ] which converges to h in. Since Γ\ is compact, there exists a relatively compact set D of such that = ΓD. Write g n = γ n d n where γ n Γ and d n D. Hence, g 1 n γ g n = d 1 n γ 1 n γ γ n d n. Since D is relatively compact, there is a convergent subsequence of {d n } n=1, which converges to some element d of. Hence we get, Since Γ is discrete, for large n, lim n γ 1 n γ γ n = d 1 hd. γ 1 n γ γ n = d 1 hd. Hence h [γ]. Thus [γ] is closed in. The conjugacy class [γ] is homeomorphic to the homogeneous space γ \. Hence there exists a natural structure of a smooth manifold on it such that it is a submanifold of. Since γ is non trivial (it contains a Cartan subgroup of ), it is of lower dimension than and hence of measure zero with respect to the Haar measure µ on. Lemma 3.2. Let Ω be a relatively compact subset of. Then the set A Ω = { [γ] : γ Γ and [γ] Ω } is finite.
8 8 CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN Proof. Let x be such that x 1 γx Ω. As in Lemma 3.1, write x = γ 1.δ where γ 1 Γ and δ D. Hence γ 1 1 γγ 1 DΩD 1 which is relatively compact in. Hence γ 1 1 γγ 1 DΩD 1 Γ which is a finite set. Corollary 2. Let E be the union of the conjugacy classes [γ] such that γ Γ 1 Γ 2. Then E is a closed subset of measure zero in. Proof. By using above two lemmas, it follows that E C is finite for every compact subset C. Hence E is closed in. It is of measure zero since it is a countable union of sets of measure zero Proof of Theorem 1.1. For π Ĝ, let t π = m(π, Γ 1 ) m(π, Γ 2 ). Let f Cc (). Since the series in equation (4) converges absolutely, by comparing equation (4) for Γ 1 and Γ 2, we obtain: π Ĝ t π χ π (f) = By hypothesis, t π = 0 finite subset S of Ĝ such that, (5) π S t π χ π (f) = [γ] [Γ 1 ] [Γ 2 ] (a(γ, Γ 1 ) a(γ, Γ 2 )) O γ (f). for all but finitely many π Ĝ. Hence there exists a [γ] [Γ 1 ] [Γ 2 ] (a(γ, Γ 1 ) a(γ, Γ 2 )) O γ (f). Since S is a finite set, by Harish Chandra s Theorem 2.3, there exists a function φ L 1 loc () such that (6) π S t π.χ π (f) = f(g) φ(g) dµ(g) f C c (). Let E be as in Corollary 2 above. Let g be any point outside E. Since E is closed in, there exists a relatively compact neighborhood U of g such that U E =. Hence, if f C c () is supported on U, we have O γ (f) = 0 γ Γ 1 Γ 2.
9 SPECTRAL STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE 9 Hence from equations (5) and (6) above, we get : f(g) φ(g) dµ(g) = 0, for all smooth compactly supported functions f supported in U. But this means that φ(g) is essentially 0 on U. Since U was a neighborhood of an arbitrary point g outside E, and E is a closed subset of measure zero, we conclude that φ(g) is essentially 0 on. By equation (6) above : t π χ π (f) = 0 f Cc (). π S From the linear independence of characters (Theorem 2.2), we get that t π = 0 for any π S. Hence, m(π, Γ 1 ) = m(π, Γ 2 ) π Ĝ. i.e., the lattices Γ 1 and Γ 2 are representation equivalent in. 4. Proof of Theorem 1.2 We recall the definition and some properties of spherical functions needed in the proof of Theorem 1.2. Definition 4.1. [4, p.399] A complex valued function φ on is called a spherical function if (1) φ(e) = 1. (2) φ(k 1 xk 2 ) = φ(x) k 1, k 2 K and x. (3) φ is a common eigenfunction for all D in the space D(/K) of - invariant differential operators on /K with eigenvalue λ(d): Dφ = λ(d)φ D D(/K). The map D λ(d) defines a algebra homomorphism of D(/K) into C. Denote by Cc (//K) the space of smooth and compactly supported bi-kinvariant functions on. Let π be a spherical unitary representation of. The space π K of K-fixed vectors is one dimensional (cf. Helgason [6, p.416]). Let φ π be the associated
10 10 CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN elementary spherical function defined by φ π (x) = π(x) e π, e π, where e π is a K-fixed vector of the representation space of π such that e π = 1. We have the following proposition: Proposition 4.1. Let π be an irreducible unitary spherical representation of. Then the following hold: (i) The associated elementary spherical functions φ pi are analytic on. (ii) The relationship of the elementary spherical function φ π to character χ π is given by the following equation: χ π (f) = f(g) φ π (g) dg f Cc (//K). (iii) Let {π j : 1 j k} be a finite collection of mutually inequivalent irreducible spherical representations of. The associated elementary spherical functions { φ πj : 1 j k } are linearly independent. Proof. (i) Since the algebra D(/K) contains the Laplace-Beltrami operator which is an elliptic, essentially self adjoint differential operator, it follows that the elementary spherical functions φ π are analytic on. (ii) Let V be the space underlying the representation π. iven f Cc (//K), the image π(f)(v ) of the convolution operator π(f) lands in the space V K of K-invariants. Hence the trace is given by, χ π (f) = trace (π(f)) = π(f)e π, e π = f(g) φ π (g) dg. (iii) The function φ πj is an eigenvector for the character λ πj. Since the representations π j are mutually inequivalent, the homomorphisms λ πj are distinct and hence the corresponding eigenvectors are linearly independent.
11 SPECTRAL STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE 11 Now we turn to the geometric aspects of the Selberg trace formula. Let //K denote the collection of orbits under the action of K K acting on by, (7) (k, l)g = k 1 gl k, l K, g. Lemma 4.1. The space Cc (//K) consisting of bi-k-invariant compactly supported smooth functions on separate points on //K. Proof. The orbits of K K being compact are closed subsets of. iven two orbits KxK, KyK choose a compactly supported, smooth function which is positive on KxK and vanishes on KyK. Then, F (g) = f(kgl)dkdl, K K is a bi-k-invariant compactly supported smooth function on which separates the two orbits. Lemma 4.2. Let Γ be a torsion-free uniform lattice in. For a non-trivial element γ Γ, the conjugacy class C γ is disjoint from K. Proof. The group x 1 γx K is discrete and contained in the compact group K, hence finite. Consequently, x 1 γx is of finite order in and hence γ is of finite order. Since Γ is torsion-free, γ is the identity element of. Lemma 4.3. If γ e, then e / KC γ K. Proof. Let x and k, l K be such that kx 1 γxl = e. Then x 1 γx K, which is not possible by Lemma 4.2. Lemma 4.4. There exists an open set B in such that C γ B is empty for all γ Γ 1 Γ 2 and B is stable under K K action on given by equation 7. Proof. Let U be a relatively compact open neighborhood of e in. Let U = KU K. Then U is relatively compact and hence it intersects atmost finitely many conjugacy classes C γ. Since U is K-stable, KC γ K U is non-empty if and only if C γ U is non-empty. Hence, the set E = [KC γ K] U is a K K-stable closed subset of U and e does not belong to E. Choose an open set V U containing e such that E V =. Let B = KV K K c, where K c is the complement of K in. It can be seen that B satisfies the desired property. γ e
12 12 CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN Now we give the proof of Theorem 1.2. Proof. By hypothesis of Theorem 1.2, there exists a finite subset S of Ĝs such that m(π, Γ 1 ) = m(π, Γ 2 ) π / S. Let f Cc (//K). Since f is bi-k-invariant, χ π (f) = 0 if π / Ĝs. Using the Selberg trace formula for f, we get : (8) t π χ π (f) = (a(γ, Γ 1 ) a(γ, Γ 2 )) O γ (f) π S [γ] [Γ 1 ] [Γ 2 ] Let φ = t π φ π. By using proposition 4.1, we get : α S f(g) φ(g) dµ(g) = (a(γ, Γ 1 ) a(γ, Γ 2 )) O γ (f). [γ] [Γ 1 ] [Γ 2 ] Let B be as in the proof of Lemma 4.4. The term on right hand side in above equation vanishes for every function f in Cc (//K) which is supported on B. Hence for such functions f, f(g) φ(g) dµ(g) = 0. By Lemma 4.1, the functions f separate points on B. Hence φ must vanish on the open subset B of. Since φ is analytic, it vanishes on all of. By the linear independence of functions φ π (Proposition 4.1), we conclude that m(π, Γ 1 ) = m(π, Γ 2 ) π Ĝs. 5. Proof of Theorem 1.3 We now proceed to derive Theorem 1.3 from Theorem 1.2. We follow the notation given in the introduction. Let π be an irreducible, unitary, spherical representation of. Let e π be a K-fixed vector of unit length in π. The associated spherical function φ π is an eigenfunction of D(/K) with eigencharacter λ π : D(φ π ) = λ π (D)φ π D D(/K). The main observation is the following proposition:
13 SPECTRAL STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE 13 Proposition 5.1. Let Γ be a torsion-free uniform lattice in. Let π be an irreducible, unitary spherical representation of. Then m(π, Γ) = dim (V (λ π, Γ)). In particular, V (λ π, Γ) is finite dimensional. Conversely, if λ is a character of D(/K) and the dimension of V (λ π, Γ) is positive, then λ = λ π for some spherical representation π of. When = P SL(2, R) this is the duality theorem proved by elfand, raev and Pyatetskii-Shapiro ([5, p.50]), relating the spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami on the upper half plane and the multiplicities of spherical representations of P SL(2, R) occurring in L 2 (Γ\P SL(2, R). We follow their proof. Proof. Let g be the Lie algebra of consisting of left invariant vector fields on. Let U(g) K be the K-invariant subspace of the universal enveloping algebra U(g) under the right action of K on U(g). From [4], we recall the fact that every D D(\K) is given by an element X of U(g) K. Hence it can be seen that D(e π ) is a K-fixed vector for each D D(/K). Since the dimension of the space of K-fixed vectors of π is one, it follows that e π is an eigenvector of D(/K) with respect to the eigencharacter λ π i.e. it lies in the eigenspace in V (λ π, Γ). Therefore, we conclude that m(π, Γ) dim (V (λ π, Γ)). Conversely let f C (X) be an eigenvector of some character λ of D(/K). Since L 2 (Γ\) = m (π, Γ) π π Ĝ we write (9) f = a π v π π Ĝ such that v π π is a vector of unit length. Let W be the space of K-invariants of L 2 (Γ\). Let P W be the orthogonal projection of L 2 (Γ\) onto W. Since f is right invariant under K, P W (f) = f. Hence we get : f = a π P W (v π ) π Ĝ
14 14 CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN The algebra D(/K) is generated by essentially self-adjoint differential operators. Hence, if the character λ π is distinct from λ, there exists an essentially self-adjoint D D(/K) such that λ π (D) λ(d). Hence the eigenvectors v π and f are orthogonal. If π is not a spherical representation, P W (v π ) = 0. Hence the indexing set in equation (9) is restricted to those irreducible unitary spherical representations with character λ π equal to λ. Since the associated spherical functions to inequivalent representations are linearly independent, the characters are distinct. Hence we conclude that there is an unique irreducible unitary spherical representation π of such that λ = λ π. Hence, m(π, Γ) = dim (V (λ π, Γ)). Now we give the proof of Theorem 1.3. Let T be a finite subset of characters of D(/K) such that dim (V (λ, Γ 1 )) = dim (V (λ, Γ 2 )) for all characters λ / T. By above Proposition 5.1, we get that : m(π, Γ 1 ) = m(π, Γ 2 ) for all but finitely many irreducible, unitary spherical representations of. Hence using Theorem 1.2 and Proposition 5.1, we get a proof of Theorem 1.3. Acknowledgement. We thank S. Kudla for raising the question of proving an analogue of the strong multiplicity one theorem in the spectral case during the conference on Modular forms held at Schiermonikvog, Netherlands in Oct The second author thanks the organizers of the conference for the invitation and warm hospitality. References [1] P. Berard. Transplantation et Isospectralite II. J. London Math. Soc., [2] D.DeTurck and C.ordon. Isospectral deformations, II, Trace formulas metrics and potentials. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., [3] J. Elstrodt, F. runwald, and J. Mennicke. Discontinuous groups on threedimensional hyperbolic space: analytic theory and arithmetical approximations. Usp. Mat. Nauk, 1983.
15 SPECTRAL STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE 15 [4] R. angolli and V.S.Varadarajan. Harmonic Analysis of Spherical Functions on Real Reductive roups. Springer-Verlag, [5] elfand, raev, and Pyatetskii-Shapiro. Representation theory and automorphic functions. W.B.Saunders company, [6] S. Helgason. roups and eometric Analysis. Academic Press, INC, [7] A. W. Knapp. Representation Theory of Semisimple roups: An Overview Based on Examples. Princeton University Press, [8] S. Lang. Introduction to Modular Forms. Springer-Verlag, [9] N. Wallach. On the Selberg Trace formula in the case of compact quotient. Bull.of the American Math.Society, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai , India. address:
Introduction to Selberg Trace Formula.
Introduction to Selberg Trace Formula. Supriya Pisolkar Abstract These are my notes of T.I.F.R. Student Seminar given on 30 th November 2012. In this talk we will first discuss Poisson summation formula
More informationOn Spectrum and Arithmetic
On Spectrum and Arithmetic C. S. Rajan School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai rajan@math.tifr.res.in 11 August 2010 C. S. Rajan (TIFR) On Spectrum and Arithmetic 11 August
More informationCHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups
CHAPTER 6 Representations of compact groups Throughout this chapter, denotes a compact group. 6.1. Examples of compact groups A standard theorem in elementary analysis says that a subset of C m (m a positive
More informationSPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationAn introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109
An introduction to arithmetic groups Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027, China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 June 27, 2006 Plan. 1. Examples of arithmetic groups
More informationBranching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.
Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Basic Notions: Jerusalem, March 2010 Birgit Speh Cornell University 1 Let G be a group and V a vector space.
More informationIntroduction to Representations Theory of Lie Groups
Introduction to Representations Theory of Lie roups Raul omez October 14, 2009 Introduction The purpose of this notes is twofold. The first goal is to give a quick answer to the question What is representation
More informationCommensurability and Representation Equivalent Arithmetic Lattices
C. Bhagwat et al. (2014) Representation Equivalent Arithmetic Lattices, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2014, No. 8, pp. 2017 2036 Advance Access Publication January 7, 2013 doi:10.1093/imrn/rns282
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007
arxiv:0711.2128v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 SUPPORT VARIETIES OF NON-RESTRICTED MODULES OVER LIE ALGEBRAS OF REDUCTIVE GROUPS: CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA ALEXANDER PREMET J. C. Jantzen informed me that the proof
More informationFactorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett garrett/
(February 19, 2005) Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ The result sketched here is of fundamental importance in
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 26 Feb 2009
DISCRETE COMPONENTS OF SOME COMPLEMENTARY SERIES REPRESENTATIONS arxiv:0902.4620v1 [math.rt] 26 Feb 2009 B.SPEH AND T. N. VENKATARAMANA Abstract. We show that the restriction of the complementary reries
More informationOn the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem
On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem Bertram Kostant, MIT Conference on Representations of Reductive Groups Salt Lake City, Utah July 10, 2013
More information14 From modular forms to automorphic representations
14 From modular forms to automorphic representations We fix an even integer k and N > 0 as before. Let f M k (N) be a modular form. We would like to product a function on GL 2 (A Q ) out of it. Recall
More informationLECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori
LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI 1. Maximal Tori By a torus we mean a compact connected abelian Lie group, so a torus is a Lie group that is isomorphic to T n = R n /Z n. Definition 1.1.
More informationBINYONG SUN AND CHEN-BO ZHU
A GENERAL FORM OF GELFAND-KAZHDAN CRITERION BINYONG SUN AND CHEN-BO ZHU Abstract. We formalize the notion of matrix coefficients for distributional vectors in a representation of a real reductive group,
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationMATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS
MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS Steven Sy December 7, 2005 I MATRIX LIE GROUPS Definition: A matrix Lie group is a closed subgroup of Thus if is any sequence of matrices in, and for some, then either
More informationThe Hilbert-Mumford Criterion
The Hilbert-Mumford Criterion Klaus Pommerening Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany January 1987 Last change: April 4, 2017 The notions of stability and related notions apply for actions of algebraic
More informationMAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY
MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations
More informationWeyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.
Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine Windsor, October 23, 2008 β ν 1 = ν 2 S α S β ν S β ν S α ν S α S β S α S β ν
More informationRepresentations Are Everywhere
Representations Are Everywhere Nanghua Xi Member of Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 What is Representation theory Representation is reappearance of some properties or structures of one object on another.
More informationAUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I
AUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I DANIEL LITT The goal of these notes are to take the classical theory of modular/automorphic forms on the upper half plane and reinterpret them, first in terms L 2 (Γ \ SL(2,
More information(www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/harder/manuscripts/buch/), files chap2 to chap
The basic objects in the cohomology theory of arithmetic groups Günter Harder This is an exposition of the basic notions and concepts which are needed to build up the cohomology theory of arithmetic groups
More informationBredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press
1 Introduction Outline Section 3: Topology of 2-orbifolds: Compact group actions Compact group actions Orbit spaces. Tubes and slices. Path-lifting, covering homotopy Locally smooth actions Smooth actions
More informationC*-Algebras and Group Representations
C*-Algebras and Department of Mathematics Pennsylvania State University EMS Joint Mathematical Weekend University of Copenhagen, February 29, 2008 Outline Summary Mackey pointed out an analogy between
More informationARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES
ASIAN J. MATH. c 2008 International Press Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 289 298, September 2008 002 ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES RAUL QUIROGA-BARRANCO Abstract.
More informationCHARACTERISTIC POLYNOMIAL PATTERNS IN DIFFERENCE SETS OF MATRICES
CHARACTERISTIC POLYNOMIAL PATTERNS IN DIFFERENCE SETS OF MATRICES MICHAEL BJÖRKLUND AND ALEXANDER FISH Abstract. We show that for every subset E of positive density in the set of integer squarematrices
More informationAHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations.
AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations. Nate Harman September 16, 2014 1 Introduction and motivation Let k be a locally compact non-discrete field with non-archimedean valuation
More informationSpherical Inversion on SL n (R)
Jay Jorgenson Serge Lang Spherical Inversion on SL n (R) Springer Contents Acknowledgments Overview Table of the Decompositions ix xi xvii CHAPTER I Iwasawa Decomposition and Positivity 1 1. The Iwasawa
More informationRepresentation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom
Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition
More information1. Pseudo-Eisenstein series
(January 4, 202) Spectral Theory for SL 2 (Z)\SL 2 (R)/SO 2 (R) Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Pseudo-Eisenstein series Fourier-Laplace-Mellin transforms Recollection
More informationA PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach
A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach Abstract. Let (G, K) be a Hermitian symmetric pair and let g and k denote the corresponding complexified
More informationA spectral gap property for subgroups of finite covolume in Lie groups
A spectral gap property for subgroups of finite covolume in Lie groups Bachir Bekka and Yves Cornulier Dedicated to the memory of Andrzej Hulanicki Abstract Let G be a real Lie group and H a lattice or,
More informationHUBER S THEOREM FOR HYPERBOLIC ORBISURFACES
HUBER S THEOREM FOR HYPERBOLIC ORBISURFACES EMILY B. DRYDEN AND ALEXANDER STROHMAIER Abstract. We show that for compact orientable hyperbolic orbisurfaces, the Laplace spectrum determines the length spectrum
More informationREGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES
REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES MAKIKO SUMI TANAKA 1. Introduction This article is based on the collaboration with Tadashi Nagano. In the first part of this article we briefly review basic
More informationRepresentations of Totally Disconnected Groups
Chapter 5 Representations of Totally Disconnected Groups Abstract In this chapter our goal is to develop enough of the representation theory of locally compact totally disconnected groups (or td groups
More informationA Crash Course in Topological Groups
A Crash Course in Topological Groups Iian B. Smythe Department of Mathematics Cornell University Olivetti Club November 8, 2011 Iian B. Smythe (Cornell) Topological Groups Nov. 8, 2011 1 / 28 Outline 1
More informationFixed Point Theorem and Character Formula
Fixed Point Theorem and Character Formula Hang Wang University of Adelaide Index Theory and Singular Structures Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse 29 May, 2017 Outline Aim: Study representation theory
More informationIsolated cohomological representations
Isolated cohomological representations p. 1 Isolated cohomological representations and some cohomological applications Nicolas Bergeron E.N.S. Paris (C.N.R.S.) Isolated cohomological representations p.
More informationON RIGIDITY OF ALGEBRAIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS
ON RIGIDITY OF ALGEBRAIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS ALEX CLARK AND ROBBERT FOKKINK Abstract. We study topological rigidity of algebraic dynamical systems. In the first part of this paper we give an algebraic condition
More informationGEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS
GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS ANA BALIBANU DISCUSSED WITH PROFESSOR VICTOR GINZBURG 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to explore the geometry of a Lie algebra g through the action
More informationEssays on representations of p-adic groups. Smooth representations. π(d)v = ϕ(x)π(x) dx. π(d 1 )π(d 2 )v = ϕ 1 (x)π(x) dx ϕ 2 (y)π(y)v dy
10:29 a.m. September 23, 2006 Essays on representations of p-adic groups Smooth representations Bill Casselman University of British Columbia cass@math.ubc.ca In this chapter I ll define admissible representations
More informationEIGENVALUES OF CONGRUENCE COVERS OF GEOMETRICALLY FINITE HYPERBOLIC MANIFOLDS
EIGENVALUES OF CONGRUENCE COVERS OF GEOMETRICALLY FINITE HYPERBOLIC MANIFOLDS HEE OH Abstract. Let G = SO(n, 1) for n 2 and Γ a geometrically finite Zariski dense subgroup of G which is contained in an
More informationTopics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem
Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem 1 Fourier Analysis, a review We ll begin with a short review of simple facts about Fourier analysis, before going on to interpret
More informationarxiv:dg-ga/ v2 15 Dec 1995
arxiv:dg-ga/9512001v2 15 Dec 1995 On the index of Dirac operators on arithmetic quotients Anton Deitmar Math. Inst. d. Univ., INF 288, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany ABSTRACT: Using the Arthur-Selberg trace
More information08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms
(February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops
More informationOn the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms
On the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms Liubomir Chiriac Abstract The generalized Ramanujan Conjecture for unitary cuspidal automorphic representations π on GL 2 posits
More informationGeometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture Paul Baum Penn State Representations of Reductive Groups University of Utah, Salt Lake City July 9, 2013 Paul Baum (Penn State) Geometric Structure
More informationPeter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.
and of and Strings JC, 11 June, 2013 and of 1 2 3 4 5 of and of and Idea of 1 Study locally compact Hausdorff topological spaces through their algebras of continuous functions. The product on this algebra
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable
More informationA CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS
UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE ACTA MATHEMATICA, FASCICULUS XLI 2003 A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS by J. Szenthe Abstract. In case of Riemannian manifolds isometric actions admitting submanifolds
More informationMath 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition
Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ Φ, and let B be the unique
More informationDecay to zero of matrix coefficients at Adjoint infinity by Scot Adams
Decay to zero of matrix coefficients at Adjoint infinity by Scot Adams I. Introduction The main theorems below are Theorem 9 and Theorem 11. As far as I know, Theorem 9 represents a slight improvement
More information0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r
CHAPTER 4 Representations of finite groups of Lie type Let F q be a finite field of order q and characteristic p. Let G be a finite group of Lie type, that is, G is the F q -rational points of a connected
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.sp] 12 Feb 2013
EIGENVALUES OF CONGRUENCE COVERS OF GEOMETRICALLY FINITE HYPERBOLIC MANIFOLDS arxiv:1302.2950v1 [math.sp] 12 Feb 2013 HEE OH Abstract. Let G = SO(n,1) for n 2 and Γ a geometrically finite Zariski dense
More informationLECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)
LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is
More informationNon separated points in the dual spaces of semi simple Lie groups
1 Non separated points in the dual spaces of semi simple Lie groups Let G be a connected semi simple Lie group with finite center, g its Lie algebra, g c = g R C, G the universal enveloping algebra of
More informationRepresentations of moderate growth Paul Garrett 1. Constructing norms on groups
(December 31, 2004) Representations of moderate growth Paul Garrett Representations of reductive real Lie groups on Banach spaces, and on the smooth vectors in Banach space representations,
More informationIrreducible subgroups of algebraic groups
Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups Martin W. Liebeck Department of Mathematics Imperial College London SW7 2BZ England Donna M. Testerman Department of Mathematics University of Lausanne Switzerland
More informationOn the Notion of an Automorphic Representation *
On the Notion of an Automorphic Representation * The irreducible representations of a reductive group over a local field can be obtained from the square-integrable representations of Levi factors of parabolic
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM. Hee Oh
ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM Hee Oh Abstract. In this paper, we generalize Margulis s S-arithmeticity theorem to the case when S can be taken as an infinite set of primes. Let R be
More informationA GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR
A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR M. EMERTON, D. NADLER, AND K. VILONEN 1. Introduction In the paper [BB1], Beilinson and Bernstein used the method of localisation to give a new proof and generalisation of Casselman
More informationHighest-weight Theory: Verma Modules
Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,
More informationSTABILITY AND ENDOSCOPY: INFORMAL MOTIVATION. James Arthur University of Toronto
STABILITY AND ENDOSCOPY: INFORMAL MOTIVATION James Arthur University of Toronto The purpose of this note is described in the title. It is an elementary introduction to some of the basic ideas of stability
More informationA Criterion for Flatness of Sections of Adjoint Bundle of a Holomorphic Principal Bundle over a Riemann Surface
Documenta Math. 111 A Criterion for Flatness of Sections of Adjoint Bundle of a Holomorphic Principal Bundle over a Riemann Surface Indranil Biswas Received: August 8, 2013 Communicated by Edward Frenkel
More informationTHE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT
THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT ANKE D. POHL Abstract. Incomplete notes of the talk in the IRTG Student Seminar 07.06.06. This is a draft version and thought for internal use only. The Theorem of the
More informationBruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups
Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups Maarten Solleveld Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen joint work with Ralf Meyer 26 November 2013 Starting point Let G be a reductive p-adic
More informationFundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration
Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration Gérard Laumon CNRS and Université Paris-Sud May 13, 2009 Introduction In this talk I shall mainly report on Ngô Bao Châu s proof of the Langlands-Shelstad Fundamental
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF REDUCTIVE p-adic GROUPS. Under revision March Table of Contents
REPRESENTATIONS OF REDUCTIVE p-adic GROUPS Under revision March 2009 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................. 2 2. Valuations and local fields....................................................
More informationRepresentation Theory
Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim
More informationΓ-EXTENSIONS OF THE SPECTRUM OF AN ORBIFOLD
Γ-EXTENSIONS OF THE SPECTRUM OF AN ORBIFOLD CARLA FARSI, EMILY PROCTOR, AND CHRISTOPHER SEATON Abstract. We introduce the Γ-extension of the spectrum of the Laplacian of a Riemannian orbifold, where Γ
More informationLecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework
Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework B. Binegar Department of Mathematics Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078, USA Nankai Summer School in Representation Theory and Harmonic
More informationInduced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations
Induced Representations Frobenius Reciprocity Math G4344, Spring 2012 1 Generalities about Induced Representations For any group G subgroup H, we get a restriction functor Res G H : Rep(G) Rep(H) that
More informationGroup Gradings on Finite Dimensional Lie Algebras
Algebra Colloquium 20 : 4 (2013) 573 578 Algebra Colloquium c 2013 AMSS CAS & SUZHOU UNIV Group Gradings on Finite Dimensional Lie Algebras Dušan Pagon Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University
More informationSYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5
SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5 LIAT KESSLER Let (M, ω) be a connected compact symplectic manifold, T a torus, T M M a Hamiltonian action of T on M, and Φ: M t the assoaciated moment map. Theorem 0.1 (The
More informationMargulis Superrigidity I & II
Margulis Superrigidity I & II Alastair Litterick 1,2 and Yuri Santos Rego 1 Universität Bielefeld 1 and Ruhr-Universität Bochum 2 Block seminar on arithmetic groups and rigidity Universität Bielefeld 22nd
More informationIntertwining integrals on completely solvable Lie groups
s on s on completely solvable Lie June 16, 2011 In this talk I shall explain a topic which interests me in my collaboration with Ali Baklouti and Jean Ludwig. s on In this talk I shall explain a topic
More informationNotes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers
Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop Eric Sommers 17 July 2009 2 Contents 1 Background 5 1.1 Linear algebra......................................... 5 1.1.1
More informationGelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions
Gelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions A. Aizenbud Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://math.mit.edu/~aizenr Examples Example (Fourier Series) Examples Example (Fourier Series) L 2 (S 1 ) =
More informationNotes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.
Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem. Version 0.00 with misprints, The are a few obvious, but important consequences of the theorem of Eli Cartan on the maximal tori. The first one is the observation
More informationMostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and
Mostow Rigidity W. Dison June 17, 2005 0 Introduction Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces We will be concerned with (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and (b) simply connected,
More informationHARTSHORNE EXERCISES
HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY NOTES FOR MATH 4108 SPRING 2012
REPRESENTATION THEORY NOTES FOR MATH 4108 SPRING 2012 JOSEPHINE YU This note will cover introductory material on representation theory, mostly of finite groups. The main references are the books of Serre
More informationSYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction
SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS CRAIG JACKSON 1. Introduction Generally speaking, geometric quantization is a scheme for associating Hilbert spaces
More informationLemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.
Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group
More informationSince G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =
Problem 1 Show that if π is an irreducible representation of a compact lie group G then π is also irreducible. Give an example of a G and π such that π = π, and another for which π π. Is this true for
More informationFORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS
Sairaiji, F. Osaka J. Math. 39 (00), 3 43 FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS FUMIO SAIRAIJI (Received March 4, 000) 1. Introduction Let be an elliptic curve over Q. We denote by ˆ
More informationRaising the Levels of Modular Representations Kenneth A. Ribet
1 Raising the Levels of Modular Representations Kenneth A. Ribet 1 Introduction Let l be a prime number, and let F be an algebraic closure of the prime field F l. Suppose that ρ : Gal(Q/Q) GL(2, F) is
More informationOn lengths on semisimple groups
On lengths on semisimple groups Yves de Cornulier May 21, 2009 Abstract We prove that every length on a simple group over a locally compact field, is either bounded or proper. 1 Introduction Let G be a
More informationParameterizing orbits in flag varieties
Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties W. Ethan Duckworth April 2008 Abstract In this document we parameterize the orbits of certain groups acting on partial flag varieties with finitely many orbits.
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.rt] 1 Jul 1996
SUPERRIGID SUBGROUPS OF SOLVABLE LIE GROUPS DAVE WITTE arxiv:math/9607221v1 [math.rt] 1 Jul 1996 Abstract. Let Γ be a discrete subgroup of a simply connected, solvable Lie group G, such that Ad G Γ has
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II
COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II LECTURES BY JOACHIM SCHWERMER, NOTES BY TONY FENG Contents 1. Review 1 2. Lifting differential forms from the boundary 2 3. Eisenstein
More informationTitle: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on
Title: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on manifolds. Author: Ognjen Milatovic Department Address: Department
More informationON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT
ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT HUNG YEAN LOKE AND GORDAN SAVIN Abstract. Let g = k s be a Cartan decomposition of a simple complex Lie algebra corresponding to
More informationEndoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group
Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group Wen-Wei Li wwli@math.ac.cn Morningside Center of Mathematics January 17, 2012 EANTC The local case: recollections F : local field, char(f ) 2. ψ
More informationDiscrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 15 (2005) 261 267 c 2005 Heldermann Verlag Discrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups Jeffrey D. Adler and Alan Roche Communicated by S. Gindikin Abstract.
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationThe Arthur trace formula and spectral theory on locally symmetric spaces
The Arthur trace formula and spectral theory on locally symmetric spaces Werner Müller University of Bonn Institute of Mathematics Banff, May 19, 2008 Introduction The Selberg trace formula establishes
More informationA bundle-theoretic perspective to Kac Moody groups
A bundle-theoretic perspective to Kac Moody groups Christoph Wockel May 31, 2007 Outline Kac Moody algebras and groups Central extensions and cocycles Cocycles for twisted loop algebras and -groups Computation
More information