A comparison of Paley-Wiener theorems
|
|
- Adam Bradley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A comparison of Paley-Wiener theorems for groups and symmetric spaces Erik van den Ban Department of Mathematics University of Utrecht International Conference on Integral Geometry, Harmonic Analysis and Representation Theory In honor of Sigurdur Helgason on the occasion of his 80-th birthday Reykjavik, August 18, 2007
2 Outline Paley-Wiener theorems Euclidean space Riemannian symmetric space Spherical Fourier transform Helgason s Paley-Wiener theorems Paley-Wiener theorems for the group Minimal principal series Arthur-Campoli conditions Paley-Wiener theorems for the group Delorme s intertwining conditions Comparison of Paley-Wiener spaces Jets of families of representations Reformulation of conditions The role of the Hecke algebra
3 Euclidean space Setting a : finite dimensional Euclidean space; Fourier transform F : Cc (a) O(a C ), Ff (λ) = f (X)e λ(x) dx; C R (a) := {f C c (a) supp f B(0; R)}. a Definition (Paley-Wiener space) PW R (a) := {ϕ O(a C ) sup(1+ λ )N e R Reλ ϕ(λ) < }. Paley-Wiener theorem F : C R (a) PWR (a) (topol. lin. isom. onto).
4 Euclidean space Setting a : finite dimensional Euclidean space; Fourier transform F : Cc (a) O(a C ), Ff (λ) = f (X)e λ(x) dx; C R (a) := {f C c (a) supp f B(0; R)}. a Definition (Paley-Wiener space) PW R (a) := {ϕ O(a C ) sup(1+ λ )N e R Reλ ϕ(λ) < }. Paley-Wiener theorem F : C R (a) PWR (a) (topol. lin. isom. onto).
5 Euclidean space Setting a : finite dimensional Euclidean space; Fourier transform F : Cc (a) O(a C ), Ff (λ) = f (X)e λ(x) dx; C R (a) := {f C c (a) supp f B(0; R)}. a Definition (Paley-Wiener space) PW R (a) := {ϕ O(a C ) sup(1+ λ )N e R Reλ ϕ(λ) < }. Paley-Wiener theorem F : C R (a) PWR (a) (topol. lin. isom. onto).
6 Non-compact Riemannian symmetric space Setting G semisimple, connected, finite center; K maximal compact; G = KAN Iwasawa decomposition; Σ = Σ(g, a), Σ + positive system; A + positive chamber; W : Weylgroup. Polar decomposition G = K A + K ; C R (K \G/K ) := {f C c (K \G/K ) supp f K exp B(0; R)K };
7 Non-compact Riemannian symmetric space Setting G semisimple, connected, finite center; K maximal compact; G = KAN Iwasawa decomposition; Σ = Σ(g, a), Σ + positive system; A + positive chamber; W : Weylgroup. Polar decomposition G = K A + K ; C R (K \G/K ) := {f C c (K \G/K ) supp f K exp B(0; R)K };
8 Spherical Fourier transform Spherical principal series P = MAN minimal parabolic subgroup π λ := Ind G P (1 λ 1) in Γ L 2(G P C λ+ρ ) K -fixed element: 1 λ (kan) = a λ ρ π λ is realizable in L 2 (K /M) (since G K M P). Definition (Spherical Fourier transform) F : C c (G/K ) K O(a C ) L2 (K /M) K, Ff (λ) = π λ (f )1 λ = G/K f (x) π λ(x)1 λ dx Note F : C c (K \G/K ) O(a C ) C O(a C ).
9 Spherical Fourier transform Spherical principal series P = MAN minimal parabolic subgroup π λ := Ind G P (1 λ 1) in Γ L 2(G P C λ+ρ ) K -fixed element: 1 λ (kan) = a λ ρ π λ is realizable in L 2 (K /M) (since G K M P). Definition (Spherical Fourier transform) F : C c (G/K ) K O(a C ) L2 (K /M) K, Ff (λ) = π λ (f )1 λ = G/K f (x) π λ(x)1 λ dx Note F : C c (K \G/K ) O(a C ) C O(a C ).
10 Spherical Fourier transform Spherical principal series P = MAN minimal parabolic subgroup π λ := Ind G P (1 λ 1) in Γ L 2(G P C λ+ρ ) K -fixed element: 1 λ (kan) = a λ ρ π λ is realizable in L 2 (K /M) (since G K M P). Definition (Spherical Fourier transform) F : C c (G/K ) K O(a C ) L2 (K /M) K, Ff (λ) = π λ (f )1 λ = G/K f (x) π λ(x)1 λ dx Note F : C c (K \G/K ) O(a C ) C O(a C ).
11 Helgason s Paley-Wiener theorems Theorem (Helgason 66, estimates by Gangolli 71) F : C R (K \G/K ) PWR (a) W. Theorem (Helgason 73 ) F : C R (G/K ) K PW R (G/K ). Definition (Paley-Wiener space ) PW R (G/K ) = {ϕ PW R (a) L 2 (K /M) K ϕ(wλ) = A w (λ)ϕ(λ) w W } where A w (λ) End(L 2 (K /M) K ) normalized standard intertwiner (coeffs rational in λ).
12 Helgason s Paley-Wiener theorems Theorem (Helgason 66, estimates by Gangolli 71) F : C R (K \G/K ) PWR (a) W. Theorem (Helgason 73 ) F : C R (G/K ) K PW R (G/K ). Definition (Paley-Wiener space ) PW R (G/K ) = {ϕ PW R (a) L 2 (K /M) K ϕ(wλ) = A w (λ)ϕ(λ) w W } where A w (λ) End(L 2 (K /M) K ) normalized standard intertwiner (coeffs rational in λ).
13 Helgason s Paley-Wiener theorems Theorem (Helgason 66, estimates by Gangolli 71) F : C R (K \G/K ) PWR (a) W. Theorem (Helgason 73 ) F : C R (G/K ) K PW R (G/K ). Definition (Paley-Wiener space ) PW R (G/K ) = {ϕ PW R (a) L 2 (K /M) K ϕ(wλ) = A w (λ)ϕ(λ) w W } where A w (λ) End(L 2 (K /M) K ) normalized standard intertwiner (coeffs rational in λ).
14 The group Minimal principal series P = MAN minimal parabolic subgroup; π ξ,λ = Ind G P (ξ λ 1), for ξ M, λ a C, realizable in V (ξ) := {f L 2 (K ) H ξ f (km) = ξ(m) 1 f (k)}. Definition (Minimal Fourier transform) F : C R (G) K K O(a C ) End( ). where End( ) := [ ξ EndV (ξ) ] K K. Ff (λ) ξ := π ξ,λ (f ) End(V (ξ)) K K for f C c (G) K K, ξ M and λ a C,
15 The group Minimal principal series P = MAN minimal parabolic subgroup; π ξ,λ = Ind G P (ξ λ 1), for ξ M, λ a C, realizable in V (ξ) := {f L 2 (K ) H ξ f (km) = ξ(m) 1 f (k)}. Definition (Minimal Fourier transform) F : C R (G) K K O(a C ) End( ). where End( ) := [ ξ EndV (ξ) ] K K. Ff (λ) ξ := π ξ,λ (f ) End(V (ξ)) K K for f C c (G) K K, ξ M and λ a C,
16 Arthur s Paley-Wiener space Definition (Taylor functionals) O(a C ) tayl := {L : a C S(a) supp L finite}. O(a C ) ϕ Lϕ = λ suppl [L λϕ] (λ). Definition (Arthur-Campoli functionals) AC(G, K ) = {L O(a C ) tayl End( ) K K L = 0 on λ (π ξ,λ (x) ξ M)}. PW space PW Arth (G, K ) = {ϕ PW(a) End( ) Lϕ = 0 L AC(G, K )}.
17 Arthur s Paley-Wiener space Definition (Taylor functionals) O(a C ) tayl := {L : a C S(a) supp L finite}. O(a C ) ϕ Lϕ = λ suppl [L λϕ] (λ). Definition (Arthur-Campoli functionals) AC(G, K ) = {L O(a C ) tayl End( ) K K L = 0 on λ (π ξ,λ (x) ξ M)}. PW space PW Arth (G, K ) = {ϕ PW(a) End( ) Lϕ = 0 L AC(G, K )}.
18 Arthur s Paley-Wiener space Definition (Taylor functionals) O(a C ) tayl := {L : a C S(a) supp L finite}. O(a C ) ϕ Lϕ = λ suppl [L λϕ] (λ). Definition (Arthur-Campoli functionals) AC(G, K ) = {L O(a C ) tayl End( ) K K L = 0 on λ (π ξ,λ (x) ξ M)}. PW space PW Arth (G, K ) = {ϕ PW(a) End( ) Lϕ = 0 L AC(G, K )}.
19 PW theorems for the group Theorem (Arthur 82, Campoli for split rank one) F : C c (G, K ) PW Arth (G, K ). History (incomplete!) Helgason 66, 73: G/K (not a special case); Zhelobenko 74: G complex; Delorme 82: one conjugacy class of Cartan; Arthur 82: general G; Delorme-Clozel 84: trace Paley-Wiener theorem; vdb & Schlichtkrull 03: generalization to Cc (G/H) K ; Delorme 04: general G, different formulation & proof; vdb & Schlichtkrull 05: generalization to E (G/H) K.
20 PW theorems for the group Theorem (Arthur 82, Campoli for split rank one) F : C c (G, K ) PW Arth (G, K ). History (incomplete!) Helgason 66, 73: G/K (not a special case); Zhelobenko 74: G complex; Delorme 82: one conjugacy class of Cartan; Arthur 82: general G; Delorme-Clozel 84: trace Paley-Wiener theorem; vdb & Schlichtkrull 03: generalization to Cc (G/H) K ; Delorme 04: general G, different formulation & proof; vdb & Schlichtkrull 05: generalization to E (G/H) K.
21 PW theorems for the group Theorem (Arthur 82, Campoli for split rank one) F : C c (G, K ) PW Arth (G, K ). History (incomplete!) Helgason 66, 73: G/K (not a special case); Zhelobenko 74: G complex; Delorme 82: one conjugacy class of Cartan; Arthur 82: general G; Delorme-Clozel 84: trace Paley-Wiener theorem; vdb & Schlichtkrull 03: generalization to Cc (G/H) K ; Delorme 04: general G, different formulation & proof; vdb & Schlichtkrull 05: generalization to E (G/H) K.
22 Families of representations Differentiation of family λ π ξ,λ holomorphic family of representations; differentiation in a direction η a gives new holomorphic family π (η) ξ,λ ; Set D of data: each datum D D describes sequences of such differentations followed by taking direct sums; datum D yields π (D) representation in V (D) ; ϕ PW(a) End( ) yields ϕ (D) End(V (D) ).
23 Families of representations Differentiation of family λ π ξ,λ holomorphic family of representations; differentiation in a direction η a gives new holomorphic family π (η) ξ,λ ; Set D of data: each datum D D describes sequences of such differentations followed by taking direct sums; datum D yields π (D) representation in V (D) ; ϕ PW(a) End( ) yields ϕ (D) End(V (D) ).
24 Families of representations Differentiation of family λ π ξ,λ holomorphic family of representations; differentiation in a direction η a gives new holomorphic family π (η) ξ,λ ; Set D of data: each datum D D describes sequences of such differentations followed by taking direct sums; datum D yields π (D) representation in V (D) ; ϕ PW(a) End( ) yields ϕ (D) End(V (D) ).
25 Families of representations Differentiation of family λ π ξ,λ holomorphic family of representations; differentiation in a direction η a gives new holomorphic family π (η) ξ,λ ; Set D of data: each datum D D describes sequences of such differentations followed by taking direct sums; datum D yields π (D) representation in V (D) ; ϕ PW(a) End( ) yields ϕ (D) End(V (D) ).
26 Families of representations Differentiation of family λ π ξ,λ holomorphic family of representations; differentiation in a direction η a gives new holomorphic family π (η) ξ,λ ; Set D of data: each datum D D describes sequences of such differentations followed by taking direct sums; datum D yields π (D) representation in V (D) ; ϕ PW(a) End( ) yields ϕ (D) End(V (D) ).
27 Delorme s PW space Definition (Delorme s PW space) PW Del (G, K ) consists of ϕ PW(a) End( ) satisfying the following intertwining relations. For each datum D D and all submodules U j V j V (D), j = 1, 2, (1) ϕ (D) preserves U 1, V 1 and U 2, V 2 ; (2) for all T Hom g,k (V 1 /U 1, V 2 /U 2 ), the following diagram commutes: V 1 /U 1 V 2 /U 2 ϕ (D) V 1 /U 1 ϕ (D) V 2 /U 2 Theorem (Delorme 05) F : C c (G) K K PWDel (G, K ).
28 Delorme s PW space Definition (Delorme s PW space) PW Del (G, K ) consists of ϕ PW(a) End( ) satisfying the following intertwining relations. For each datum D D and all submodules U j V j V (D), j = 1, 2, (1) ϕ (D) preserves U 1, V 1 and U 2, V 2 ; (2) for all T Hom g,k (V 1 /U 1, V 2 /U 2 ), the following diagram commutes: V 1 /U 1 V 2 /U 2 ϕ (D) V 1 /U 1 ϕ (D) V 2 /U 2 Theorem (Delorme 05) F : C c (G) K K PWDel (G, K ).
29 Delorme s PW space Definition (Delorme s PW space) PW Del (G, K ) consists of ϕ PW(a) End( ) satisfying the following intertwining relations. For each datum D D and all submodules U j V j V (D), j = 1, 2, (1) ϕ (D) preserves U 1, V 1 and U 2, V 2 ; (2) for all T Hom g,k (V 1 /U 1, V 2 /U 2 ), the following diagram commutes: V 1 /U 1 V 2 /U 2 ϕ (D) V 1 /U 1 ϕ (D) V 2 /U 2 Theorem (Delorme 05) F : C c (G) K K PWDel (G, K ).
30 Delorme s PW space Definition (Delorme s PW space) PW Del (G, K ) consists of ϕ PW(a) End( ) satisfying the following intertwining relations. For each datum D D and all submodules U j V j V (D), j = 1, 2, (1) ϕ (D) preserves U 1, V 1 and U 2, V 2 ; (2) for all T Hom g,k (V 1 /U 1, V 2 /U 2 ), the following diagram commutes: V 1 /U 1 V 2 /U 2 ϕ (D) V 1 /U 1 ϕ (D) V 2 /U 2 Theorem (Delorme 05) F : C c (G) K K PWDel (G, K ).
31 Comparison of the Paley-Wiener spaces Natural problem Prove that PW Arth (G, K ) = PW Del (G, K ) without using the Paley-Wiener theorems. Solution: joint work with Sofien Souaifi Involves three key ideas (1) Use jets instead of repeated differentiations 1 ; (2) Reformulate Delorme s intertwining conditions; (3) Use the Hecke algebra (multipl n = convolution) H(G, K ) := E K (G) K K. 1 idea goes back to Casselman
32 Comparison of the Paley-Wiener spaces Natural problem Prove that PW Arth (G, K ) = PW Del (G, K ) without using the Paley-Wiener theorems. Solution: joint work with Sofien Souaifi Involves three key ideas (1) Use jets instead of repeated differentiations 1 ; (2) Reformulate Delorme s intertwining conditions; (3) Use the Hecke algebra (multipl n = convolution) H(G, K ) := E K (G) K K. 1 idea goes back to Casselman
33 Comparison of the Paley-Wiener spaces Natural problem Prove that PW Arth (G, K ) = PW Del (G, K ) without using the Paley-Wiener theorems. Solution: joint work with Sofien Souaifi Involves three key ideas (1) Use jets instead of repeated differentiations 1 ; (2) Reformulate Delorme s intertwining conditions; (3) Use the Hecke algebra (multipl n = convolution) H(G, K ) := E K (G) K K. 1 idea goes back to Casselman
34 Comparison of the Paley-Wiener spaces Natural problem Prove that PW Arth (G, K ) = PW Del (G, K ) without using the Paley-Wiener theorems. Solution: joint work with Sofien Souaifi Involves three key ideas (1) Use jets instead of repeated differentiations 1 ; (2) Reformulate Delorme s intertwining conditions; (3) Use the Hecke algebra (multipl n = convolution) H(G, K ) := E K (G) K K. 1 idea goes back to Casselman
35 Comparison of the Paley-Wiener spaces Natural problem Prove that PW Arth (G, K ) = PW Del (G, K ) without using the Paley-Wiener theorems. Solution: joint work with Sofien Souaifi Involves three key ideas (1) Use jets instead of repeated differentiations 1 ; (2) Reformulate Delorme s intertwining conditions; (3) Use the Hecke algebra (multipl n = convolution) H(G, K ) := E K (G) K K. 1 idea goes back to Casselman
36 Jets of families of representations Jet space O 0 : space of germs at 0 of holomorphic functions on a C ; m 0 O 0 : unique maximal ideal; I m 0 : ideal such that k : m k 0 I m 0. Jet space: O 0 /I (finite dimensional /C). Jets of families O(a C ) ϕ ϕ(i) O(a C ) O 0/I. O(a C ) Hom(V, W ) φ ϕ (I) O(a C ) Hom(O 0/I V, O 0 /I W ). π ξ,λ, V (ξ) π (I) ξ,λ, O 0/I V (ξ).
37 Jets of families of representations Jet space O 0 : space of germs at 0 of holomorphic functions on a C ; m 0 O 0 : unique maximal ideal; I m 0 : ideal such that k : m k 0 I m 0. Jet space: O 0 /I (finite dimensional /C). Jets of families O(a C ) ϕ ϕ(i) O(a C ) O 0/I. O(a C ) Hom(V, W ) φ ϕ (I) O(a C ) Hom(O 0/I V, O 0 /I W ). π ξ,λ, V (ξ) π (I) ξ,λ, O 0/I V (ξ).
38 Jets of families of representations Jet space O 0 : space of germs at 0 of holomorphic functions on a C ; m 0 O 0 : unique maximal ideal; I m 0 : ideal such that k : m k 0 I m 0. Jet space: O 0 /I (finite dimensional /C). Jets of families O(a C ) ϕ ϕ(i) O(a C ) O 0/I. O(a C ) Hom(V, W ) φ ϕ (I) O(a C ) Hom(O 0/I V, O 0 /I W ). π ξ,λ, V (ξ) π (I) ξ,λ, O 0/I V (ξ).
39 Jets of families of representations Jet space O 0 : space of germs at 0 of holomorphic functions on a C ; m 0 O 0 : unique maximal ideal; I m 0 : ideal such that k : m k 0 I m 0. Jet space: O 0 /I (finite dimensional /C). Jets of families O(a C ) ϕ ϕ(i) O(a C ) O 0/I. O(a C ) Hom(V, W ) φ ϕ (I) O(a C ) Hom(O 0/I V, O 0 /I W ). π ξ,λ, V (ξ) π (I) ξ,λ, O 0/I V (ξ).
40 Reformulation of Delorme s intertwining conditions Direct sums of jets Datum: I O 0, ξ 1,..., ξ n M, µ 1,..., µ n a C ; π (I) ξ,µ := j π (I) ξ j,µ j in j V (ξ j ) (I) ; PW(a) End( ) ϕ ϕ (I) ξ,µ j End(V (ξ j ) (I) ); Definition For V a Harish-Chandra module: End(V ) # := {ϕ End(V ) K K n U < V n : ϕ n (U) U}. Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
41 Reformulation of Delorme s intertwining conditions Direct sums of jets Datum: I O 0, ξ 1,..., ξ n M, µ 1,..., µ n a C ; π (I) ξ,µ := j π (I) ξ j,µ j in j V (ξ j ) (I) ; PW(a) End( ) ϕ ϕ (I) ξ,µ j End(V (ξ j ) (I) ); Definition For V a Harish-Chandra module: End(V ) # := {ϕ End(V ) K K n U < V n : ϕ n (U) U}. Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
42 Reformulation of Delorme s intertwining conditions Direct sums of jets Datum: I O 0, ξ 1,..., ξ n M, µ 1,..., µ n a C ; π (I) ξ,µ := j π (I) ξ j,µ j in j V (ξ j ) (I) ; PW(a) End( ) ϕ ϕ (I) ξ,µ j End(V (ξ j ) (I) ); Definition For V a Harish-Chandra module: End(V ) # := {ϕ End(V ) K K n U < V n : ϕ n (U) U}. Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
43 Reformulation of Delorme s intertwining conditions Direct sums of jets Datum: I O 0, ξ 1,..., ξ n M, µ 1,..., µ n a C ; π (I) ξ,µ := j π (I) ξ j,µ j in j V (ξ j ) (I) ; PW(a) End( ) ϕ ϕ (I) ξ,µ j End(V (ξ j ) (I) ); Definition For V a Harish-Chandra module: End(V ) # := {ϕ End(V ) K K n U < V n : ϕ n (U) U}. Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
44 Reformulation of Delorme s intertwining conditions Direct sums of jets Datum: I O 0, ξ 1,..., ξ n M, µ 1,..., µ n a C ; π (I) ξ,µ := j π (I) ξ j,µ j in j V (ξ j ) (I) ; PW(a) End( ) ϕ ϕ (I) ξ,µ j End(V (ξ j ) (I) ); Definition For V a Harish-Chandra module: End(V ) # := {ϕ End(V ) K K n U < V n : ϕ n (U) U}. Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
45 Reformulation of Arthur-Campoli conditions Definition For (π, V ) a Harish-Chandra module: π(g) = {ψ End(V ) K K g G : ψ, π(g) = 0}. Lemma (Arthur-Campoli conditions) ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Arth (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,λ (G). Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
46 Reformulation of Arthur-Campoli conditions Definition For (π, V ) a Harish-Chandra module: π(g) = {ψ End(V ) K K g G : ψ, π(g) = 0}. Lemma (Arthur-Campoli conditions) ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Arth (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,λ (G). Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
47 Reformulation of Arthur-Campoli conditions Definition For (π, V ) a Harish-Chandra module: π(g) = {ψ End(V ) K K g G : ψ, π(g) = 0}. Lemma (Arthur-Campoli conditions) ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Arth (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,λ (G). Delorme s condition: ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Del (G, K ) if and only if for all data (I, ξ, µ) : ϕ (I) ξ,µ End(V (I) ξ,µ )#.
48 The role of the Hecke algebra Recall Category of Harish-Chandra modules category of finite modules for H(G, K ) (= E K (G) K K U(g) U(k) E (K ) K K ); Theorem (vdb - Souaifi) Let (π, V ) be a Harish-Chandra module. Then End(V ) # = π(h(g, K )); π(g) = π(h(g, K )). Corollary PW Del (G, K ) = PW Arth (G, K ). Proof. For all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ End( j V (ξ j ) (I) ) # ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,µ (G).
49 The role of the Hecke algebra Recall Category of Harish-Chandra modules category of finite modules for H(G, K ) (= E K (G) K K U(g) U(k) E (K ) K K ); Theorem (vdb - Souaifi) Let (π, V ) be a Harish-Chandra module. Then End(V ) # = π(h(g, K )); π(g) = π(h(g, K )). Corollary PW Del (G, K ) = PW Arth (G, K ). Proof. For all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ End( j V (ξ j ) (I) ) # ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,µ (G).
50 The role of the Hecke algebra Recall Category of Harish-Chandra modules category of finite modules for H(G, K ) (= E K (G) K K U(g) U(k) E (K ) K K ); Theorem (vdb - Souaifi) Let (π, V ) be a Harish-Chandra module. Then End(V ) # = π(h(g, K )); π(g) = π(h(g, K )). Corollary PW Del (G, K ) = PW Arth (G, K ). Proof. For all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ End( j V (ξ j ) (I) ) # ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,µ (G).
51 The role of the Hecke algebra Recall Category of Harish-Chandra modules category of finite modules for H(G, K ) (= E K (G) K K U(g) U(k) E (K ) K K ); Theorem (vdb - Souaifi) Let (π, V ) be a Harish-Chandra module. Then End(V ) # = π(h(g, K )); π(g) = π(h(g, K )). Corollary PW Del (G, K ) = PW Arth (G, K ). Proof. For all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ End( j V (ξ j ) (I) ) # ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,µ (G).
52 The role of the Hecke algebra Recall Category of Harish-Chandra modules category of finite modules for H(G, K ) (= E K (G) K K U(g) U(k) E (K ) K K ); Theorem (vdb - Souaifi) Let (π, V ) be a Harish-Chandra module. Then End(V ) # = π(h(g, K )); π(g) = π(h(g, K )). Corollary PW Del (G, K ) = PW Arth (G, K ). Proof. For all data (I, ξ, µ), ϕ (I) ξ,µ End( j V (ξ j ) (I) ) # ϕ (I) ξ,µ π(i) ξ,µ (G).
53 Comparison with Helgason s theorems F(H(G, K )) P(a ) End( ) subalgebra; Theorem (Reformulation of Arthur s) ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Arth (G, K ) iff for all choices λ 1,..., λ n a C, u 1,..., u n S(a ), and ξ 1,..., ξ n M there exists a p F(H(G, K )) such that u j ϕ ξj (λ j ) = u j p ξj (λ j ) ( 1 j n). Lemma (a) F(pr 1 H(G, K ) δ K ) = P(a ) W. (b) F(H(G, K ) δ K ) = {ϕ P(a ) L 2 (K /M) K w W : ϕ(wλ) = A w (λ)ϕ(λ)}. Proof of (b) uses Helgason s thm. Arthur s thm + Lemma = Helgason s thm.
54 Comparison with Helgason s theorems F(H(G, K )) P(a ) End( ) subalgebra; Theorem (Reformulation of Arthur s) ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Arth (G, K ) iff for all choices λ 1,..., λ n a C, u 1,..., u n S(a ), and ξ 1,..., ξ n M there exists a p F(H(G, K )) such that u j ϕ ξj (λ j ) = u j p ξj (λ j ) ( 1 j n). Lemma (a) F(pr 1 H(G, K ) δ K ) = P(a ) W. (b) F(H(G, K ) δ K ) = {ϕ P(a ) L 2 (K /M) K w W : ϕ(wλ) = A w (λ)ϕ(λ)}. Proof of (b) uses Helgason s thm. Arthur s thm + Lemma = Helgason s thm.
55 Comparison with Helgason s theorems F(H(G, K )) P(a ) End( ) subalgebra; Theorem (Reformulation of Arthur s) ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Arth (G, K ) iff for all choices λ 1,..., λ n a C, u 1,..., u n S(a ), and ξ 1,..., ξ n M there exists a p F(H(G, K )) such that u j ϕ ξj (λ j ) = u j p ξj (λ j ) ( 1 j n). Lemma (a) F(pr 1 H(G, K ) δ K ) = P(a ) W. (b) F(H(G, K ) δ K ) = {ϕ P(a ) L 2 (K /M) K w W : ϕ(wλ) = A w (λ)ϕ(λ)}. Proof of (b) uses Helgason s thm. Arthur s thm + Lemma = Helgason s thm.
56 Comparison with Helgason s theorems F(H(G, K )) P(a ) End( ) subalgebra; Theorem (Reformulation of Arthur s) ϕ PW(a) End( ) belongs to PW Arth (G, K ) iff for all choices λ 1,..., λ n a C, u 1,..., u n S(a ), and ξ 1,..., ξ n M there exists a p F(H(G, K )) such that u j ϕ ξj (λ j ) = u j p ξj (λ j ) ( 1 j n). Lemma (a) F(pr 1 H(G, K ) δ K ) = P(a ) W. (b) F(H(G, K ) δ K ) = {ϕ P(a ) L 2 (K /M) K w W : ϕ(wλ) = A w (λ)ϕ(λ)}. Proof of (b) uses Helgason s thm. Arthur s thm + Lemma = Helgason s thm.
57 Dear Siggi Thanks for inspiring us with your beautiful math
58 Happy Birthday!
59 Ann. Math. 1973
60 The Paley-Wiener theorem
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationCusp Forms on Hyperbolic Spaces
Nils Byrial Andersen Aarhus University Denmark joint work with Mogens Flensted-Jensen and Henrik Schlichtkrull Boston, 7 January 2012 Abstract Cusp forms on a group G can be defined as the kernel of certain
More informationC*-Algebras and Group Representations
C*-Algebras and Department of Mathematics Pennsylvania State University EMS Joint Mathematical Weekend University of Copenhagen, February 29, 2008 Outline Summary Mackey pointed out an analogy between
More informationA Paley-Wiener theorem for reductive symmetric spaces
Annals of Mathematics, 164 (2006), 879 909 A Paley-Wiener theorem for reductive symmetric spaces By E. P. van den Ban and H. Schlichtkrull Abstract Let X = G/H be a reductive symmetric space and K a maximal
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II
COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II LECTURES BY JOACHIM SCHWERMER, NOTES BY TONY FENG Contents 1. Review 1 2. Lifting differential forms from the boundary 2 3. Eisenstein
More informationSpherical Inversion on SL n (R)
Jay Jorgenson Serge Lang Spherical Inversion on SL n (R) Springer Contents Acknowledgments Overview Table of the Decompositions ix xi xvii CHAPTER I Iwasawa Decomposition and Positivity 1 1. The Iwasawa
More informationBruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups
Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups Maarten Solleveld Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen joint work with Ralf Meyer 26 November 2013 Starting point Let G be a reductive p-adic
More informationKazhdan-Lusztig polynomials for
Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials for Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trends in Representation Theory January 4, 2012, Boston Outline What are KL polynomials for? How to compute
More informationAbstract. We give a survey of the status of some of the fundamental problems in harmonic
Harmonic analysis on semisimple symmetric spaces A survey of some general results E. P. van den Ban, M. Flensted{Jensen and H. Schlichtkrull Abstract. We give a survey of the status of some of the fundamental
More informationDirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations
Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations Dedicated to Bert Kostant with great admiration Jing-Song Huang, HKUST Kostant Conference MIT, May 28 June 1, 2018 coadjoint orbits of reductive
More informationUncertainty principles for the Schrödinger equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type
Uncertainty principles for the Schrödinger equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type Angela Pasquale Université de Lorraine Joint work with Maddala Sundari Geometric Analysis on Euclidean
More information53'(M) (resp. 8'(M)) consists of all distributions on M (resp. distributions on M
APPLICATIONS OF THE RADON TRANSFORM TO REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS* BY SIGURDUR HELGASON MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Communicated by Lars V. Ahlfors, April 21, 1969 Abstract.-From
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 31 Oct 2008
Cartan Helgason theorem, Poisson transform, and Furstenberg Satake compactifications arxiv:0811.0029v1 [math.rt] 31 Oct 2008 Adam Korányi* Abstract The connections between the objects mentioned in the
More informationGelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions
Gelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions A. Aizenbud Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://math.mit.edu/~aizenr Examples Example (Fourier Series) Examples Example (Fourier Series) L 2 (S 1 ) =
More informationA QUICK PROOF OF HARISH-CHANDRA'S PLANCHEREL THEOREM FOR SPHERICAL FUNCTIONS ON A SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUP
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 63, Number 1, March 1977 A QUICK PROOF OF HARISH-CHANDRA'S PLANCHEREL THEOREM FOR SPHERICAL FUNCTIONS ON A SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUP JONATHAN ROSENBERG1
More information2 T ρ G and W is the Weyl group. The generalization of this approach developed in 50-s by Harish-Chandra and Godement led to the proof of the uniquene
The theory of group representations is in the center of interest of I. Gelfand. I think that this is related to the nature of this domain which combines analysis, algebra and topology in a very intricate
More informationRepresentations with Iwahori-fixed vectors Paul Garrett garrett/ 1. Generic algebras
(February 19, 2005) Representations with Iwahori-fixed vectors Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Generic algebras Strict Iwahori-Hecke algebras Representations with Iwahori-fixed
More informationSEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS
SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS BRIAN COLLIER 1. Outiline The goal is to talk about semisimple Lie groups, mainly noncompact real semisimple Lie groups. This is a very broad subject so we will do our best to be
More informationBranching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.
Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Basic Notions: Jerusalem, March 2010 Birgit Speh Cornell University 1 Let G be a group and V a vector space.
More informationA NOTE ON REAL ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFER AND PSEUDO-COEFFICIENTS
A NOTE ON REAL ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFER AND PSEUDO-COEFFICIENTS D. SHELSTAD 1. I In memory of Roo We gather results about transfer using canonical factors in order to establish some formulas for evaluating
More informationRepresentations of Totally Disconnected Groups
Chapter 5 Representations of Totally Disconnected Groups Abstract In this chapter our goal is to develop enough of the representation theory of locally compact totally disconnected groups (or td groups
More informationPrimitive Ideals and Unitarity
Primitive Ideals and Unitarity Dan Barbasch June 2006 1 The Unitary Dual NOTATION. G is the rational points over F = R or a p-adic field, of a linear connected reductive group. A representation (π, H)
More informationHomogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky
Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Hamburg,14-18 July 2008 1 The talk is based on a joint work with C.Medori and A.Tomassini (Parma) See ArXiv 0806.2272, where also a survey
More informationLecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework
Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework B. Binegar Department of Mathematics Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078, USA Nankai Summer School in Representation Theory and Harmonic
More informationClassification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO
UTMS 2011 8 April 22, 2011 Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs by Toshiyuki Kobayashi and Yoshiki Oshima T UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO GRADUATE SCHOOL OF
More informationA Paley-Wiener theorem for the Bessel Laplace transform (I): the case SU(n, n)/sl(n, C) R +
Journal of Lie Theory?? (??)???? c?? Heldermann Verlag Berlin Version of April 19, 007 A Paley-Wiener theorem for the Bessel Laplace transform (I): the case SU(n, n)/sl(n, C) R + Salem Ben Saïd Abstract.
More informationSubquotients of Minimal Principal Series
Subquotients of Minimal Principal Series ν 1 = ν 2 Sp(4) 0 1 2 ν 2 = 0 Alessandra Pantano, UCI July 2008 1 PART 1 Introduction Preliminary Definitions and Notation 2 Langlands Quotients of Minimal Principal
More informationDifferential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces
Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces Sigurdur Helgason Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume 34 nsffvjl American Mathematical Society l Providence, Rhode Island PREFACE PREFACE TO THE
More informationX-RAY TRANSFORM ON DAMEK-RICCI SPACES. (Communicated by Jan Boman)
Volume X, No. 0X, 00X, X XX Web site: http://www.aimsciences.org X-RAY TRANSFORM ON DAMEK-RICCI SPACES To Jan Boman on his seventy-fifth birthday. François Rouvière Laboratoire J.A. Dieudonné Université
More informationA SIMPLE EXPRESSION FOR THE CASIMIR OPERATOR ON A LIE GROUP
proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 77, Number 3, December 1979 A SIMPLE EXPRESSION FOR THE CASIMIR OPERATOR ON A LIE GROUP MARY F. ANDERSON1 Abstract. The expression for the Casimir
More informationKazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups
Kazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups Binyong Sun (Joint with Jing-Song Huang) Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science Chinese Academy of Sciences IMS, NUS March 28, 2016 Contents
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationAHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations.
AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations. Nate Harman September 16, 2014 1 Introduction and motivation Let k be a locally compact non-discrete field with non-archimedean valuation
More informationEssays on representations of p-adic groups. Smooth representations. π(d)v = ϕ(x)π(x) dx. π(d 1 )π(d 2 )v = ϕ 1 (x)π(x) dx ϕ 2 (y)π(y)v dy
10:29 a.m. September 23, 2006 Essays on representations of p-adic groups Smooth representations Bill Casselman University of British Columbia cass@math.ubc.ca In this chapter I ll define admissible representations
More informationNon separated points in the dual spaces of semi simple Lie groups
1 Non separated points in the dual spaces of semi simple Lie groups Let G be a connected semi simple Lie group with finite center, g its Lie algebra, g c = g R C, G the universal enveloping algebra of
More informationE.P. van den Ban and H. Schlichtkrull. 1 Introduction 2. 2 Notation and preliminaries 7. 3 Normalization of measures The Fourier transform 12
The most-continuous part of the Plancherel decomposition for a reductive symmetric space E.P. van den Ban and H. Schlichtkrull August 9, 1995 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Notation and preliminaries 7 3
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More informationA GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR
A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR M. EMERTON, D. NADLER, AND K. VILONEN 1. Introduction In the paper [BB1], Beilinson and Bernstein used the method of localisation to give a new proof and generalisation of Casselman
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MOONSHINE VERTEX OPERATOR ALGEBRA BY MEANS OF VIRASORO FRAMES. 1. Introduction
A CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MOONSHINE VERTEX OPERATOR ALGEBRA BY MEANS OF VIRASORO FRAMES CHING HUNG LAM AND HIROSHI YAMAUCHI Abstract. In this article, we show that a framed vertex operator algebra V satisfying
More informationLecture 4 Super Lie groups
Lecture 4 Super Lie groups In this lecture we want to take a closer look to supermanifolds with a group structure: Lie supergroups or super Lie groups. As in the ordinary setting, a super Lie group is
More informationUnitarity of non-spherical principal series
Unitarity of non-spherical principal series Alessandra Pantano July 2005 1 Minimal Principal Series G: a real split semisimple Lie group θ: Cartan involution; g = k p: Cartan decomposition of g a: maximal
More informationThe Gelfand-Tsetlin Basis (Too Many Direct Sums, and Also a Graph)
The Gelfand-Tsetlin Basis (Too Many Direct Sums, and Also a Graph) David Grabovsky June 13, 2018 Abstract The symmetric groups S n, consisting of all permutations on a set of n elements, naturally contain
More informationEndoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group
Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group Wen-Wei Li wwli@math.ac.cn Morningside Center of Mathematics January 17, 2012 EANTC The local case: recollections F : local field, char(f ) 2. ψ
More informationHuygens principle and a Paley Wiener type Theorem on Damek Ricci spaces
Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal Working version March 29, 2010 Huygens principle and a Paley Wiener type Theorem on Damek Ricci spaces Francesca Astengo Bianca Di Blasio Abstract. We prove that Huygens
More informationTHE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia
GLASNIK MATEMATIČKI Vol. 5(7)(017), 75 88 THE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia Abstract. Let G be the Lie group SO e(4,1), with maximal compact
More informationReducibility of generic unipotent standard modules
Journal of Lie Theory Volume?? (??)???? c?? Heldermann Verlag 1 Version of March 10, 011 Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules Dan Barbasch and Dan Ciubotaru Abstract. Using Lusztig s geometric
More information33 Idempotents and Characters
33 Idempotents and Characters On this day I was supposed to talk about characters but I spent most of the hour talking about idempotents so I changed the title. An idempotent is defined to be an element
More informationWeyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.
Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine Windsor, October 23, 2008 β ν 1 = ν 2 S α S β ν S β ν S α ν S α S β S α S β ν
More informationGeometry of symmetric R-spaces
Geometry of symmetric R-spaces Makiko Sumi Tanaka Geometry and Analysis on Manifolds A Memorial Symposium for Professor Shoshichi Kobayashi The University of Tokyo May 22 25, 2013 1 Contents 1. Introduction
More informationANALYTIC CONTINUATION OF RESOLVENT KERNELS ON NONCOMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES
ANALYTIC CONTINUATION OF RESOLVENT KERNELS ON NONCOMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES ALEXANDER STROHMAIER Abstract. Let X = G/K be a symmetric space of noncompact type and let be the Laplacian associated with a G-invariant
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS
A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS PAUL E. GUNNELLS AND ERIC SOMMERS ABSTRACT. We give a characterization of the Dynkin elements of a simple Lie algebra. Namely, we prove that one-half of a Dynkin element
More informationCARTAN SUBALGEBRAS AND BIMODULE DECOMPOSITIONS OF II 1 FACTORS.
CARTAN SUBALGEBRAS AND BIMODULE DECOMPOSITIONS OF II 1 FACTORS. SORIN POPA AND DIMITRI SHLYAKHTENKO ABSTRACT. Let A M be a MASA in a II 1 factor M. We describe the von Neumann subalgebra of M generated
More informationFixed Point Theorem and Character Formula
Fixed Point Theorem and Character Formula Hang Wang University of Adelaide Index Theory and Singular Structures Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse 29 May, 2017 Outline Aim: Study representation theory
More informationInduced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations
Induced Representations Frobenius Reciprocity Math G4344, Spring 2012 1 Generalities about Induced Representations For any group G subgroup H, we get a restriction functor Res G H : Rep(G) Rep(H) that
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 5 Oct 2018
INVARIANT DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON SPHERICAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACES WITH OVERGROUPS FANNY KASSEL AND TOSHIYUKI KOBAYASHI arxiv:1810.02803v1 [math.rt] 5 Oct 2018 Abstract. We investigate the structure of the
More informationMAXIMUM REGULARITY OF HUA HARMONIC FUNCTIONS
MAXIMUM REGULARITY OF UA ARMONIC FUNCTIONS P. JAMING 1. The Siegel upper half space 1.1. Setting. On C 2 consider r(z) = Im(z 2 ) z 1 2. The Siegel upper half space and its boundary are given by U ={z
More informationBLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that
More informationOn the Harish-Chandra Embedding
On the Harish-Chandra Embedding The purpose of this note is to link the Cartan and the root decompositions. In addition, it explains how we can view a Hermitian symmetric domain as G C /P where P is a
More informationNotes on the Hermitian Dual
Notes on the Hermitian Dual Jeffrey Adams January 5, 2009 These notes are incomplete as of 12/22/2008. I ll do more on them after the first of the year. 1 Basics Let H be a complex torus, with real points
More informationExercises on chapter 4
Exercises on chapter 4 Always R-algebra means associative, unital R-algebra. (There are other sorts of R-algebra but we won t meet them in this course.) 1. Let A and B be algebras over a field F. (i) Explain
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 9 Dec 2008
SMOOTH FRÉCHET GLOBALIZATIONS OF HARISH-CHANDRA MODULES arxiv:0812.1684v1 [math.rt] 9 Dec 2008 JOSEPH BERNSTEIN AND BERNHARD KRÖTZ Date: December 9, 2008. 1 2 1. Introduction Let G be a linear reductive
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS
REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5. B : V V k
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5 1. Invariant forms Recall that a bilinear form on a vector space V is a map satisfying B : V V k B (cv, dw) = cdb (v, w), B (v 1 + v, w) = B (v 1, w)+b (v, w), B (v, w 1 +
More informationON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT
ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT HUNG YEAN LOKE AND GORDAN SAVIN Abstract. Let g = k s be a Cartan decomposition of a simple complex Lie algebra corresponding to
More informationCartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26
Cartan s Criteria Math 649, 2013 Dan Barbasch February 26 Cartan s Criteria REFERENCES: Humphreys, I.2 and I.3. Definition The Cartan-Killing form of a Lie algebra is the bilinear form B(x, y) := Tr(ad
More informationGeometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture Paul Baum Penn State Representations of Reductive Groups University of Utah, Salt Lake City July 9, 2013 Paul Baum (Penn State) Geometric Structure
More informationON THE STANDARD MODULES CONJECTURE. V. Heiermann and G. Muić
ON THE STANDARD MODULES CONJECTURE V. Heiermann and G. Muić Abstract. Let G be a quasi-split p-adic group. Under the assumption that the local coefficients C defined with respect to -generic tempered representations
More informationALUTHGE ITERATION IN SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUP. 1. Introduction Given 0 < λ < 1, the λ-aluthge transform of X C n n [4]:
Unspecified Journal Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S????-????(XX)0000-0 ALUTHGE ITERATION IN SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUP HUAJUN HUANG AND TIN-YAU TAM Abstract. We extend, in the context of connected noncompact
More informationTHREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5
THREE CASES REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE LECTURE II: DELIGNE-LUSZTIG THEORY AND SOME APPLICATIONS Gerhard Hiss Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik RWTH Aachen University Summer School Finite Simple
More informationWhittaker models and Fourier coeffi cients of automorphic forms
Whittaker models and Fourier coeffi cients of automorphic forms Nolan R. Wallach May 2013 N. Wallach () Whittaker models 5/13 1 / 20 G be a real reductive group with compact center and let K be a maximal
More informationThe Omega-Regular Unitary Dual of the Metaplectic Group of Rank 2
Contemporary Mathematics The Omega-Regular Unitary Dual of the Metaplectic Group of Rank Alessandra Pantano, Annegret Paul, and Susana A. Salamanca-Riba This paper is dedicated to the dear memory of Professor
More information0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r
CHAPTER 4 Representations of finite groups of Lie type Let F q be a finite field of order q and characteristic p. Let G be a finite group of Lie type, that is, G is the F q -rational points of a connected
More informationDavid Vogan. Wilfried Schmid Birthday Conference, May 2013
Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Wilfried Schmid Birthday Conference, May 2013 Outline Standard representations Standard representations restricted to K Associated varieties
More informationA PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach
A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach Abstract. Let (G, K) be a Hermitian symmetric pair and let g and k denote the corresponding complexified
More informationLectures on restrictions of unitary representations of real reductive groups
Lectures on restrictions of unitary representations of real reductive groups Toshiyuki Kobayashi Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University Contents Lecture 1 Reductive Lie groups....................
More informationON DEGENERATION OF THE SPECTRAL SEQUENCE FOR THE COMPOSITION OF ZUCKERMAN FUNCTORS
ON DEGENERATION OF THE SPECTRAL SEQUENCE FOR THE COMPOSITION OF ZUCKERMAN FUNCTORS Dragan Miličić and Pavle Pandžić Department of Mathematics, University of Utah Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts
More information9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence
9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence 9.1. The functor Lie. The fundamental theorems of Lie concern the correspondence G Lie(G). The work of Lie was essentially local and led to the following fundamental
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9 1. Jordan-Hölder theorem and indecomposable modules Let M be a module satisfying ascending and descending chain conditions (ACC and DCC). In other words every increasing sequence
More informationRestriction of holomorphic Discrete Series to real forms
1 1 Restriction of holomorphic Discrete Series to real forms Jorge A. Vargas FAMAF-CIEM Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 5000 Córdoba (Argentine) e-mail: vargas@@famaf.unc.edu.ar 18 DIC 2000 Abstract Let
More informationHermitian Symmetric Domains
Hermitian Symmetric Domains November 11, 2013 1 The Deligne torus, and Hodge structures Let S be the real algebraic group Res C/R G m. Thus S(R) = C. If V is a finite-dimensional real vector space, the
More informationCHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago
CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0 Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld University of Chicago Some historical comments A geometric approach to representation theory for unipotent
More informationGeometry of Conformal Field Theory
Geometry of Conformal Field Theory Yoshitake HASHIMOTO (Tokyo City University) 2010/07/10 (Sat.) AKB Differential Geometry Seminar Based on a joint work with A. Tsuchiya (IPMU) Contents 0. Introduction
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 6 Mar 2018
SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS ON NORMAL REAL FORM SYMMETRIC SPACES arxiv:803.0206v [math.ap] 6 Mar 208 ANESTIS FOTIADIS AND EFFIE PAPAGEORGIOU Abstract. We prove dispersive and Strichartz estimates for Schrödinger
More informationANALYTIC FAMILIES OF EIGENFUNCTIONS ON A REDUCTIVE SYMMETRIC SPACE
REPRESENTATION THEORY An Electronic Journal of the American Mathematical Society Volume 5, Pages 615 712 (December 12, 2001) S 1088-4165(01)00146-7 ANALYTIC FAMILIES OF EIGENFUNCTIONS ON A REDUCTIVE SYMMETRIC
More informationCuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters
Cuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters Maarten Solleveld Universiteit Nijmegen joint with Anne-Marie Aubert and Ahmed Moussaoui 12 April 2016 Maarten Solleveld Universiteit Nijmegen Cuspidality
More informationBRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 4, Number 1, June 2001, Pages 71 75 BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP HI-JOON CHAE Abstract. A Bruhat-Tits building
More informationFlag Manifolds and Representation Theory. Winter School on Homogeneous Spaces and Geometric Representation Theory
Flag Manifolds and Representation Theory Winter School on Homogeneous Spaces and Geometric Representation Theory Lecture I. Real Groups and Complex Flags 28 February 2012 Joseph A. Wolf University of California
More informationLECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we continue to study the category O 0 and explain some ideas towards the proof of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture. We start by introducing
More informationA Remark on Eisenstein Series
ESI The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria A Remark on Eisenstein Series Erez M. Lapid Vienna, Preprint ESI 1894 (2007) February 25,
More informationDecomposition theorems for triple spaces
Geom Dedicata (2015) 174:145 154 DOI 10.1007/s10711-014-0008-x ORIGINAL PAPER Decomposition theorems for triple spaces Thomas Danielsen Bernhard Krötz Henrik Schlichtkrull Received: 20 December 2012 /
More informationTHE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C)
THE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1. summary Given a reductive Lie algebra g and choice of Cartan subalgebra h, the Harish- Chandra map gives an isomorphism between the center z of
More informationON A SPECTRAL ANALOGUE OF THE STRONG MULTIPLICITY ONE THEOREM. 1. Introduction
ON A SPECTRAL ANALOUE OF THE STRON MULTIPLICITY ONE THEOREM CHANDRASHEEL BHAWAT AND C. S. RAJAN Abstract. We prove spectral analogues of the classical strong multiplicity one theorem for newforms. Let
More informationSingular integrals on NA groups
Singular integrals on NA groups joint work with Alessio Martini and Alessandro Ottazzi Maria Vallarino Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche Politecnico di Torino LMS Midlands Regional Meeting and Workshop
More informationThe Plancherel decomposition for a reductive symmetric space II. Representation theory
The Plancherel decomposition for a reductive symmetric space II. Representation theory E. P. van den Ban and H. Schlichtkrull 29/11-2001, revised 1/10-2004 Abstract We obtain the Plancherel decomposition
More informationA PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM
A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM MAN SHUN JOHN MA 1. Introduction In this short note, we prove the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem. Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra. One basic question in representation
More informationA partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group
A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group joint work with Ahmed Moussaoui and Maarten Solleveld Anne-Marie Aubert Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu - Paris
More informationUnbounded KK-theory and KK-bordisms
Unbounded KK-theory and KK-bordisms joint work with Robin Deeley and Bram Mesland University of Gothenburg 161026 Warzaw 1 Introduction 2 3 4 Introduction In NCG, a noncommutative manifold is a spectral
More informationA Langlands classification for unitary representations
Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 26, 1998 Analysis on Homogeneous Spaces and Representations of Lie Groups pp. 1 26 A Langlands classification for unitary representations David A. Vogan, Jr. Abstract.
More informationQUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS
QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS SAM RASKIN 1. Differential operators on stacks 1.1. We will define a D-module of differential operators on a smooth stack and construct a symbol map when
More information